Asus Eee PC T91 MT
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Portable: Asus Eee PC T91 MTProcesseur: Intel Atom Z520
Adaptateur graphique: Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
Ècran: 8.9 pouces, 10:6, 1024x600 pixel, brillant: oui
Poids: 0.97kg
Prix: 500 euro
Moyenne de 16 Notes (depuis les 25 critiques)
Critiques pour Asus Eee PC T91 MT
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Good Gear Guide
EN→FRThe ASUS Eee PC T91 is the first tablet-convertible netbook to hit the market. While it's not perfect a perfect product, the touch-screen interface gives you another way to launch applications and even to write notes. Ultimately the unit is perhaps too cramped and slow for comfortable tablet usage. Tablet PCs came out of the closet in record numbers at the recently concluded CES 2010, but Asus has had one out for a while. The Asus Eee PC T91 doubles up as a netbook and low-cost tablet PC with touch input support on its 8.9in screen.
Critique unique, disponible en ligne, Moyen, Date: 01/15/2010
Note: Note totale: 70%
Source: PC Advisor
EN→FRTablet PCs came out of the closet in record numbers at the recently concluded CES 2010, but Asus had one out for a while. The Asus Eee PC T91 doubles up as a netbook and low-cost tablet PC with touch input support on its 9-inch screen. Asus' experiment with a touch-enabled Eee PC, although commendable, doesn't really fly too well practically. Granted the Asus Eee PC T91's tiny and easy to carry around, but its touch interface isn't quite perfect. The Asus Eee PC T91 is overpriced in terms of features when compared to other Eee PCs on offer.
Critique unique, disponible en ligne, Moyen, Date: 01/13/2010
Note: Note totale: 70%
Source: Notebookreview.com
EN→FRThe new ASUS Eee PC T91 deserves serious praise for being the first budget-priced tablet netbook on the market. The closest direct competition to the T91 is the Fujitsu U820, but with the Fujitsu retailing for more than $1,000 the Eee PC T91 essentially stands alone in the marketplace at half the price. The hardware specs might not seem too impressive at first glance, but if you're in the market for a low-cost tablet this is indeed your only real option priced below $700 without rebates or coupons.
Critique unique, disponible en ligne, Long, Date: 07/15/2009
Note: écran: 50% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Notebookreview.com
EN→FRThe new ASUS Eee PC T91 deserves serious praise for being the first budget-priced tablet netbook on the market. The closest direct competition to the T91 is the Fujitsu U820, but with the Fujitsu retailing for more than $1,000 the Eee PC T91 essentially stands alone in the marketplace at half the price. The hardware specs might not seem too impressive at first glance, but if you're in the market for a low-cost tablet this is indeed your only real option priced below $700 without rebates or coupons.
Critique unique, disponible en ligne, Long, Date: 07/15/2009
Note: prix: 80% écran: 40% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: CNet
EN→FRWe first caught sight of the Asus Eee PC T91 back at CES 2009 in January, and were immediately taken with the idea of combining a small, low-cost Netbook with a touch-screen interface. Seven months later, the final product is here, and it's largely successful for a first attempt at this kind of hybrid. It's a much more flexible way to interact with a Netbook--especially if you're tripped up by the tiny touch pads and keyboards found on most minilaptops. Asus does a good job combining a Netbook and a touch screen in the Eee PC T91, even if the system hits a couple of first-generation snags.
Critique unique, disponible en ligne, Long, Date: 07/15/2009
Note: Note totale: 80% performance: 60% équipement: 90%
Source: Hot Hardware
EN→FRWe were impressed with the battery life (nearly five hours, just as claimed), but we didn't appreciate the non-removable nature of the battery. Also, the trackpad was great, but the keys were cramped due to the small chassis. The display looked washed out and was mushy to the touch, but that's what you get in a resistive touch panel. We loved how small and light the machine was, but we lamented the fact that it really wasn't equipped to handle any task more demanding than typing a Word document, sending an email or engaging in the occasional Skype call.
Critique unique, disponible en ligne, Long, Date: 07/15/2009
Note: performance: 40% mobilité: 80% emissions: 60%
Source: Netbookchoice
EN→FRThe Asus Eee PC T91 convertible netbook officially went on sale in the US today. To mark the occasion, quite a few US publications posted their reviews today. In fact, we counted nine reviews altogether, so for those mulling the decision to lay down $499.99 on this 8.9-inch net tablet, there’s plenty of material to start your research.
Critique unique, disponible en ligne, Court, Date: 07/15/2009
performance: 40%
Source: Laptop Mag
EN→FRThis tablet netbook sets itself apart with an attractive touch interface, but it’s held back by slow performance, a small hard drive, and cramped keyboard. We give credit to ASUS for innovating; the touch features on the ASUS Eee PC T91 definitely break the netbook mold. However, its underpowered processor results in an underwhelming experience; screens take too long to open, and the lack of palm rejection is frustrating. Also, at $499, the Eee PC T91 is $100 more expensive than other netbooks that, while lacking a touchscreen, have larger 10-inch displays, and have batteries that last twice as long. Yes, the T91 is worth a look, but it’s not worth the wait.
Critique unique, disponible en ligne, Long, Date: 07/14/2009
Note: Note totale: 50%
Source: Computer Shopper
EN→FRThe marketing slogan for the Asus Eee PC T91 is "Fun at Your Fingertips," but our time with this netbook/tablet combo turned out to be less than fun for us. Asus based its first netbook tablet on what seems to be a netbook that the company has all but discarded and improved upon many times over. All the quibbles we’ve had with, say, the Eee PC 4G or Eee PC 900, such as the tight resolution, misplaced right Shift key, and slow performance, have reappeared on the T91. The T91 netbook deserves kudos for trying something new with its convertible-tablet design, but its sluggish performance mars the experience.
Critique unique, disponible en ligne, Moyen, Date: 07/01/2009
Note: Note totale: 59%
Source: Pocket Lint
EN→FROn the whole we found this new concept in netbooks and interesting one. Seeing as the usual route for a netbooks evolutionary path would be to become much faster, with greater storage or larger screens this is a welcomed diversion in design that we weren’t expecting to see at all. This could now be a very useful addition to the Eee family of computers of theirs that have already proven themselves in sales. What will be interesting to see is if this will be picked up and adopted by the average user, in addition to the educational market they’re already established in.
80
Critique unique, disponible en ligne, Moyen, Date: 06/03/2009
Note: Note totale: 80%
Source: Techradar
EN→FRThe first Eee PC to ship with a touchscreen interface - and it's great. Overall, we're impressed with what Asus has done here. Since the introduction of the original Eee PC, manufacturers (Asus included) have desperately tried to tweak netbooks to set themselves apart from the crowd. Larger screens, better hard drives, different operating systems, you name it - it's been tried. The problem is, all these tweaks are too subtle to really register. The Asus Eee PC T91 on the other hand genuinely moves things forward. As long Asus can keep pricing to realistic levels, it deserves to have another winner on its hands.
Critique unique, disponible en ligne, Moyen, Date: 05/14/2009
Note: Note totale: 90%
Source: mobile Zeit - 2/10

Critique unique, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 04/01/2010
Note: Note totale: 64%
Source: Netzwelt
DE→FRCritique unique, disponible en ligne, Moyen, Date: 03/26/2010
Note: Note totale: 80% écran: 40% emissions: 80%
Source: SFT - 4/10

Comparaison, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 03/01/2010
Note: Note totale: 88%
Source: PC Games Hardware - 3/10

Comparaison, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 02/01/2010
Note: Note totale: 88% prix: 80%
Source: Notebookcheck
DE→FRCritique unique, disponible en ligne, Long, Date: 12/22/2009
Note: Note totale: 81% performance: 36% écran: 63% mobilité: 94% finition: 84% ergonomie: 84% emissions: 92%
Source: c't - 22/2009

Comparaison, disponible en ligne, Long, Date: 10/01/2009
Note: performance: 30% écran: 50% mobilité: 80% ergonomie: 40% emissions: 90%
Source: HardwareLuxx
DE→FRCritique unique, disponible en ligne, Long, Date: 08/22/2009
Note: écran: 40% mobilité: 80%
Source: Notebookjournal
DE→FRCritique unique, disponible en ligne, Long, Date: 08/11/2009
Note: Note totale: 70% prix: 70% performance: 40% équipement: 30% écran: 40% mobilité: 30% finition: 70% ergonomie: 70%
Source: Notebookjournal
DE→FRCritique unique, disponible en ligne, Long, Date: 07/16/2009
Note: écran: 40%
Source: Notebookcheck
DE→FRCritique unique, , Long, Date: 07/15/2009
Note: écran: 50% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Hispazone
ES→FRCritique unique, disponible en ligne, Moyen, Date: 06/25/2009
Note: performance: 60% mobilité: 80%
Source: Retera
RU→FRCritique unique, disponible en ligne, Long, Date: 01/06/2010
Note: Note totale: 53% performance: 23% écran: 21% mobilité: 78% emissions: 44%
Source: Nonstop Mobil
HU→FRCritique unique, disponible en ligne, Moyen, Date: 07/05/2009
Note: Note totale: 80%
Source: Dinside
NO→FRCritique unique, disponible en ligne, Court, Date: 12/18/2009
Note: Note totale: 50%
Comment
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500: Puce graphique intégrée (embarquée) sur les chipsets UL11L, US15L, et US15W avec un noyau propriétaire PowerVR SGX. Support de DirectX 10.1, mais ne convient pas aux jeux 3D en raison de la faible fréquence d'horloge (100-200 MHz UL11L - US15) et des 4 shaders seulement. Le décodeur vidéo intégré accélère la lecture de vidéos HD (MPEG2, VC-1, AVC).
Ses cartes graphiques ne sont pas faites pour le jeu. Et même si ils tournent, ce sera avec des erreurs d'affichage et un framerate ignoble. Ce cartes graphique sont totalement incompatible avec les joueurs! les applications de bureau et d'Internet, ne sont pas un problème pour ces cartes graphiques.
>> Plus d'informations peuvent être trouvées dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et liste de Benchmarks.
Intel Atom:
Le processeur Intel Atom est un microprocesseur 64-bits pour ordinateurs portables petits et bon marché, les MIDs ou UMPC. La spécialité de la nouvelle architecture est dans le mode d'exécution "in order" (au lieu de l'habituel et plus rapide mode d'exécution "out of order"). Par conséquent, le coût du transistor de la série Atom est beaucoup plus faible, et donc moins cher à produire.
Z520: Processeur mono-core très peu puissant. Avec plus de fonctions (économies d'énergie, VT-x) que la série N des Atoms.
>> Plus d'informations peuvent être trouvées dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.
8.9": Le portable a un format d'affichage très petit et rare pour petit portables.
L'avantage est que le subnotebook peut être de petite dimension et peut être porté facilement. de plus Un petit écran a un avantage, il a besoin de peu de courant, ce qui améliore le temps d'exécution de batterie et en conséquence la mobilité. L'inconvénient est que la lecture des textes est épuisante pour les yeux. Les hautes résolutions sont a proscrire.
>> Pour connaître la finesse de l'écran, jetez un oeil sur notre liste de DPI.
0.97 kg: Ce subnotebook a le poids le plus léger par rapport aux autres ordinateurs portables et peut être porté très facilement.
Asus: ASUSTeK Computer Incorporated, une multinationale taïwanaise, produit des cartes mères, des cartes graphiques, des lecteurs optiques, des PDA, des moniteurs d'ordinateur, des ordinateurs portables, des serveurs, des produits de réseau, les téléphones mobiles, des boîtiers d'ordinateurs, des composants informatiques, et des systèmes de refroidissement d’ordinateur. La société a dégagé des revenus en 2007 atteignant US $ 6,9 milliards. ASUS a également produit des composants pour d'autres fabricants. L'Eee PC a ouvert le boom des netbooks en 2008.
72.06%: La note est mauvaise. La plupart des portables sont mieux notés. Nous ne conseillons pas cet achat.
>> Plus d'informations peuvent être trouvées dans Guide d'achat de portables.

