Acer Iconia Tab W500
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable

Price comparison
Moyenne de 12 notes (à partir de 16 critiques)
Critiques pour le/la Acer Iconia Tab W500
Source: Erenumerique
 Archive.org version
 Archive.org versionAlors que l’on attend toujours le gros des tablettes Android, quelques constructeurs se prêtent à un exercice risqué : les tablettes Windows 7. On a déjà vu avec la Eee Slate d’Asus que malgré ses qualités, l’OS de Microsoft n’est pas prévu pour un tel usage. Après un Touch Book Iconia plutôt réussi, Acer s’essaye à un hybride tablette/netbook.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 04/15/2011
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: PC World
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionThe Acer Iconia Tab W500 is great for someone who wants the familiarity of Windows, or who wants to do Windows-based work occasionally. It excels at audio and video playback, but you'll need an SD Card to store that media on because it has limited built-in storage. This tablet is faster than an average netbook, and you can remove the screen and use it as a responsive touch tablet. The main drawbacks are the bulk that comes with the hardware requirements of Windows, and the battery life that is more in line with a regular laptop than with what we've come to expect from ARM-based tablets.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 06/09/2012
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Computer Active
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionThe Acer Iconia Tab W500 is baffling. It tries to bridge the gap between full notebooks – which Acer makes well – and tablets, and fails at both.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/25/2011
Notes: Note globale: 40%
Source: Tech Advisor
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionWith a large proportion of corporate customers, we can see why Acer decided to take a punt on a Windows-based tablet. Unfortunately, a desktop OS just doesn’t cut the mustard here, and bolting on a keyboard only makes matters worse. Look to an Android tablet instead or choose a low-cost laptop if Windows is what you need.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/13/2011
Notes: Note globale: 60% prix: 70% équipement: 60% finition: 60%
Source: Techcentral.my
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionOverall, the Acer Iconia Tab W500 works better as netbook than a Tablet. If you are looking for a lightweight netbook primarily for surfing the Web, the W500 fits the bill nicely.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/11/2011
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Pocket Lint
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionThe Iconia Tab W500 wants to be the best of both worlds; in the end it's one of the nicest Windows tablets we've seen so far (barring the small size of the on-screen keyboard) and that's both praise and complaint. Windows 7 does do touch pretty well, but it's always going to be an afterthought for all but a few apps. There's a lot you can do well with touch on Windows, from browsing to playing all of your media (especially in Windows Media Center which works as well for fingers as it does for a remote control). It's the other apps that you want Windows for in the first place that don't always work well enough with touch. You have the keyboard as a fallback, but that's not quite ergonomic enough to really make this the perfect combo. But if you have a tablet PC with a swivelling keyboard that you long to be able to rip off (and you already know what compromises you'll be making), you'll love the Tab.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/09/2011
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Trusted Reviews
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionThe Acer Iconia W500 is a device that does the tablet cause no good. The keyboard dock is clumsily implemented but without it, using Windows 7 becomes a chore. After a few more passes from Acer's design bods it could have been closer to a winner, but as is it's too bulky to beat rival Android tablets and not convenient enough to worry ultra-portable laptops.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/09/2011
Notes: Note globale: 60% prix: 70% performances: 60% équipement: 80% mobilité: 60% ergonomie: 40%
Source: V3.co.uk
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionThe design flaws together with a total price of £519 to get the dock could put off some users, however the fact that the tablet runs Windows could make it attractive to businesses.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/04/2011
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: It Pro
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionWe could put up with the W500's numerous shortcomings if the battery life was long, but even here the W500 is disappointing. In our light usage web browsing test it lasted just under seven hours. This is long compared to 15in laptops, but most netbooks and some ultra-portable laptops can last as long as ten hours. When playing H.264 video, the battery ran for just under five hours. This might seem impressive at first glance, but it pales in comparison to the iPad 2 which lasted 17 hours in the same test. The bottom line is that you'd need to keep the charger close by when using the W500 just so it doesn't ran out of battery power when you need it most.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 04/08/2011
Notes: Note globale: 33%
Source: PC Pro
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionA poorly executed and expensive attempt to create a hybrid of two popular form factors.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 03/31/2011
Notes: Note globale: 50% prix: 50% performances: 33% équipement: 50% ergonomie: 50%
Source: e-media - 17/11

Comparaison, , Courte, Date: 08/01/2011
Notes: Note globale: 60% prix: 40% écran: 60% mobilité: 20% ergonomie: 80%
Source: Connect - 8/11

Comparaison, , De taille moyenne, Date: 08/01/2011
Notes: Note globale: 50% équipement: 53% mobilité: 12% ergonomie: 59%
Source: Connect - 5/11

Comparaison, , De taille moyenne, Date: 04/01/2011
Notes: équipement: 60%
Source: Hi-Tech Mail
 RU→FR Archive.org version
 RU→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/26/2011
Source: Notebook.cz
 CZ→FR Archive.org version
 CZ→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/26/2011
Commentaire
AMD Radeon HD 6250:
Carte graphique intégrée à la plateforme Ontario pour netbook ( C-50 et C-30) avec décodeur UVD3 mais sans mémoire dédiée.
Seuls les vieux jeux peuvent tourner de façon fluide sur ces ordinateurs (S'ils ne sont pas trop gourmands en ressources). Les coeurs à mémoire partagée de cette catégorie ont l'avantage d'être moins chaud et moins gourmand en énergie. Pour le bureau, internet, l'édition de photos, et le montage vidéo ces cartes graphiques n'ont aucune restrictions.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
C-50:
Dual Core basse consommation avec GPU intégré. Avec une fréquence faible, il est aussi puissant qu'un Atom monocore, mais il a un GPU intégré relativement rapide.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.


