Packard Bell dot
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable

Price comparison
Moyenne de 31 notes (à partir de 36 critiques)
Critiques pour le/la Packard Bell dot
Source: V3.co.uk
EN→FR Archive.org versionNetbooks have been growing in size since the first Asus Eee PC hit the streets. The original was almost pocket-sized, with a 7in screen and a processor only powerful enough for simple browsing and office tasks. Packard Bell’s new Dot m/a, available from Tesco Direct, is much more like a notebook in miniature, with an 11.6in widescreen display, 2GB of memory and an unusual combination of processor and graphics chipset. An excellent small notebook let down by poor battery life.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/02/2009
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Channel Web
EN→FR Archive.org versionNetbooks have been growing in size since the first Asus Eee PC hit the streets. The original was almost pocket-sized, with a 7in screen and a processor only powerful enough for simple browsing and office tasks. Packard Bell’s new Dot m/a, available from Tesco Direct, is much more like a notebook in miniature, with an 11.6in widescreen display, 2GB of memory and an unusual combination of processor and graphics chipset. An excellent small notebook let down by poor battery life.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/02/2009
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Computer Active
EN→FR Archive.org versionAn excellent small notebook let down by poor battery life
Good points Light-action, large-key keyboard; more processor power than most; excellent software bundle
Bad points Poor battery life
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 11/02/2009
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: IT Reviews
EN→FR Archive.org versionThe line between netbooks and laptops continues to blur, with screen sizes from 9-inch up to 15-inch in the mix and performance specifications with a similarly wide range. Packard Bell sees its dot s and dot m as mainstream netbooks and the larger of the two, the dot m reviewed here, has an 11.6-inch widescreen LCD and runs on a 1.2GHz, 64-bit Athlon L110 processor with 2GB memory. This is a great little machine, though more a small notebook than an oversized netbook. Vista doesn't hold it back much and the extra memory and strong ATI graphics help with this. However, if you can afford the six-cell battery, go for it, or stay fairly close to a power socket all the time.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/22/2009
Notes: mobilité: 50%
Source: Tech Advisor
EN→FR Archive.org versionBigger than your regular netbook, the Packard Bell dot m/a offers AMD processors and an 11.6in screen. Breaking away from the pack, the Packard Bell dot m/a has a bigger screen and a potentially faster processor, not to mention a graphics chip that can handle simple games if you drop the quality settings. A generous battery pack is always welcome, although actual runtime is reduced here by the inefficient processors, when compared to an Intel chipset.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/12/2009
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 70% équipement: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Reg Hardware
EN→FR Archive.org versionIn its basic form, the dot m/a is let down badly by its farcically poor battery life but if you can lay hands on one with the six-cell battery for a reasonable price then you will have a very nice machine and one that represents decent value for money. A 10.1in screen Samsung netbook like the NC10 or N110 will set you back between £300 and £350, and neither has the hi-res screen or 2GB of memory of the m/a.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/21/2009
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Techradar
EN→FR Archive.org versionWill Packard Bell's smallest netbook offer big performance? The dot s is Packard Bell's 10.1-inch netbook. Unlike its larger brothers, the dot m and dot m/a, it stays safely in known netbook territory by featuring an Intel Atom processor and running Microsoft's Windows XP operating system. As with the dot m, the sample we reviewed was a pre-production unit so we were not able to provide full benchmarking results, such as battery life testing. While the Packard Bell dot s doesn't really bring anything new to the netbook market, it is a well-rounded machine that should be on most people's list of machines to check out before making a purchase. As long as the touchpad issues are rectified, we are big fans.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/27/2009
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Techradar
EN→FR Archive.org versionEssentially the dot m/a, but from an alternate reality. Packard Bell's second 11.6-inch netbook, the dot m, shares exactly the same chassis as the dot m/a, but differs internally by carrying an Intel Atom processor and running Windows XP software. While the keyboard may not reach the standard we expect, all in all, the Packard Bell dot m proves a great netbook. The screen in particular is fantastic and this machine is certainly worth a look.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/26/2009
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Tech Advisor
EN→FR Archive.org versionThe Packard Bell dot s is a netbook with the fastest Intel Atom processor now available. Packard Bell has relaunched itself, now under the wing of Acer, and for the first time has brought two netbook models to the UK. Some wireless options are lacking, and the Packard Bell dot s feels smaller than other 10in netbooks, but the price is competitive when set against some other netbooks with long-life credentials. And don’t forget the red colour option if you want to stand out too.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/17/2009
Notes: Note globale: 70% prix: 70% équipement: 70% finition: 70%
Source: CNet
EN→FR Archive.org versionHold the front page -- it's a netbook without an Intel Atom CPU! The Packard Bell dot m/a, also known in some circles as the Gateway LT3100, does away with the Intel norm in favour of an AMD Athlon L110 CPU. It also plumps for a larger-than-usual 11.6-inch screen and a slightly wider chassis, pushing it dangerously near laptop territory. The Packard Bell dot m/a is a good netbook, particularly for anyone seeking a larger screen than normal. It's slightly bigger than many of its rivals and its battery life is merely average, but it has an excellent keyboard and would make for a great second computer.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/11/2009
Notes: Note globale: 75%
Source: Notebookjournal
DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/25/2010
Notes: Note globale: 90% prix: 90% performances: 50% équipement: 30% écran: 30% mobilité: 90% finition: 90% ergonomie: 70%
Source: Notebookinfo
DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/25/2010
Notes: Note globale: 80% performances: 62% équipement: 94% écran: 75% mobilité: 89% finition: 88%
Source: Mobile News - 1/10

Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longueur inconnue, Date: 01/01/2010
Notes: performances: 80% écran: 60% mobilité: 60%
Source: Computerbild - 26/2009

Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/01/2009
Notes: Note globale: 81% prix: 80%
Source: Minitechnet
DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/28/2009
Notes: Note globale: 80% performances: 80% équipement: 80% écran: 100% mobilité: 80% finition: 100% ergonomie: 60%
Source: Minitechnet
DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/15/2009
Notes: Note globale: 100% performances: 40% équipement: 100% écran: 100% mobilité: 100% finition: 100% ergonomie: 80%
Source: PC Praxis - 10/09

Comparaison, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 09/01/2009
Notes: Note globale: 86% prix: 80%
Source: PC Welt
DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/05/2009
Notes: Note globale: 52% prix: 70% performances: 95% équipement: 52% mobilité: 20% ergonomie: 67%
Source: PC Praxis - 6/09

Comparaison, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 05/01/2009
Notes: Note globale: 90% prix: 80%
Source: Minitechnet
DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/16/2009
Notes: Note globale: 89% performances: 60% équipement: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 100% ergonomie: 80% degré de nuisance: 60%
Source: PC Go - 3/09

Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 02/01/2009
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 90%
Source: PC Praxis - 1/09

Comparaison, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 01/01/2009
Notes: Note globale: 92% prix: 70%
Source: PC Welt
DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/30/2008
Notes: Note globale: 72% prix: 55% performances: 99% équipement: 73% mobilité: 83% ergonomie: 58%
Source: Notebookjournal
DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/05/2008
Notes: Note globale: 90% prix: 80% performances: 70% équipement: 30% écran: 60% mobilité: 70% finition: 70% ergonomie: 70%
Source: Notebook / Organizer / Handy - 1-2/09

Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 12/01/2008
Notes: Note globale: 80% performances: 80% écran: 50% mobilité: 90% degré de nuisance: 80%
Source: MuyComputer
ES→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 04/07/2010
Notes: Note globale: 79%
Source: Pc Tuner
IT→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 02/10/2010
Notes: prix: 80% performances: 80% mobilité: 80%
Source: PC World Italia
IT→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/16/2009
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Computer Totaal
NL→FR Archive.org versionComparaison, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/19/2009
Notes: performances: 60% écran: 80% mobilité: 80%
Source: Hardware.info
NL→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/19/2009
Notes: écran: 80%
Source: PCM
NL→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 06/15/2009
Notes: Note globale: 75% performances: 62% mobilité: 88% ergonomie: 90%
Source: Computer Totaal
NL→FR Archive.org versionComparaison, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 04/23/2009
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Portablegear
NL→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 02/01/2009
Notes: Note globale: 77%
Source: PCM
NL→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 12/29/2008
Notes: Note globale: 70% écran: 40%
Source: Retera
RU→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/14/2010
Notes: Note globale: 50% performances: 58% écran: 41% mobilité: 60% degré de nuisance: 43%
Source: Retera
RU→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/14/2010
Notes: Note globale: 50% performances: 29% écran: 41% mobilité: 60% degré de nuisance: 43%
Commentaire
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950: L’Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 950 est une carte graphique intégrée à la carte mère sur les chipsets Mobile Intel 945GM. c’est une version accélérée de la GMA 900.
Ses cartes graphiques ne sont pas faites pour le jeu. Et même si ils tournent, ce sera avec des erreurs d'affichage et un framerate ignoble. Ce cartes graphique sont totalement incompatible avec les joueurs! les applications de bureau et d'Internet, ne sont pas un problème pour ces cartes graphiques.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
Intel Atom:
Le processeur Intel Atom est un microprocesseur 64-bits pour ordinateurs portables petits et bon marché, les MIDs ou UMPC. La spécialité de la nouvelle architecture est dans le mode d'exécution "in order" (au lieu de l'habituel et plus rapide mode d'exécution "out of order"). Par conséquent, le coût du transistor de la série Atom est beaucoup plus faible, et donc moins cher à produire.
N270: Un processeur pas cher pas puissant mais avec une basse consommation. Mais au Mhz près il est moins puissant que la concurrence.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.




