Panasonic Toughbook C1
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable

Price comparison
Moyenne de 7 notes (à partir de 14 critiques)
Critiques pour le/la Panasonic Toughbook C1
Source: Tech Advisor
EN→FR Archive.org versionIf rugged is what you need, then this is the business – but be prepared to pay the higher price. However, if you need something super slim, or that'll forgive you for being a poor typist, then avoid the ToughBook. As an alternative, you can also use it as a tablet with stylus input.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/10/2011
Source: Good Gear Guide
EN→FR Archive.org versionA tablet PC capable of withstanding hard knocks and spilt drinks. We do like the idea of the semi-rugged touchscreen laptop, and this Toughbook certainly has merit, but we'd bolster the configuration somewhat: we'd give it 4GB of RAM and an SSD instead of a mechanical hard drive, and we'd add a few modcons such USB 3.0.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/19/2011
Notes: Note globale: 75%
Source: Tech Advisor
EN→FR Archive.org versionThe Panasonic Toughbook CF-C1 is a convertible tablet PC capable of withstanding hard knocks and spilt drinks alike. We do like the idea of the semi-rugged touchscreen laptop, and the Panasonic Toughbook CF-C1 certainly has merit. In an ideal world, however, we'd bolster the configurations somewhat: we'd give it 4GB of RAM and an SSD instead of a mechanical hard drive, and we'd add a few modcons such USB 3.0 and HDMI.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 04/19/2011
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: IT Reviews
EN→FR Archive.org versionIt's very pricey, but the Panasonic Toughbook CF-C1 is the ideal mobile PC companion for those who need its specialised features - balancing ruggedness with lightness and offering the advantages of both notebooks and tablet PCs with near-continuous battery life.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 03/30/2011
Source: ITNews Australia
EN→FR Archive.org versionConvertible tablets are a niche category, but for in-the-field businesses that require their unique tablet abilities, Panasonic has produced an accomplished example. It’s by no means cheap, but with the usual Toughbook build quality accompanied by two years of accidental damage cover and three years of standard warranty, the CF-C1 could be worth every penny in the long run.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 03/01/2011
Source: PC Authority
EN→FR Archive.org versionConvertible tablets are a niche category, but for in-the-field businesses that require their unique tablet abilities, Panasonic has produced an accomplished example. It’s by no means cheap, but with the usual Toughbook build quality accompanied by two years of accidental damage cover and three years of standard warranty, the CF-C1 should work out to be worth every penny in the long run.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 02/11/2011
Notes: Note globale: 67% prix: 67% performances: 67% équipement: 67% ergonomie: 67%
Source: BCW - Business Computing World
EN→FR Archive.org versionIf your working scenario requires a dedicated tablet the lure of Apple’s iPad is great and becoming greater as time goes on—as long as you’re not tied to Windows. Convertible tablet PCs suit those who need a physical keyboard and tablet features, but the trade-off is weight, bulk and less convenience when using a laptop in tablet mode.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/03/2011
Source: It Pro
EN→FR Archive.org versionThe ToughBook CF-C1 is very much a nice product. If you want a touchscreen computer but don't need to run Windows applications, an iPad would be a better choice. If you want a rugged computer but don't need a touchscreen, one of Panasonic's non-touchscreen ToughBooks would be better value. Even if you want a rugged touchscreen Windows computer, you'll have to put up with some peculiar hardware design choices, such as the cramped keyboard and touchpad. You'll also want to invest in the second battery to get the most out of it.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 12/07/2010
Notes: Note globale: 67%
Source: PC Pro
EN→FR Archive.org versionWith ultraportable weight, plenty of power and some splendid on-the-road features, it's worth the high price
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/22/2010
Notes: Note globale: 83% prix: 67% performances: 83%
Source: Laptop Mag
EN→FR Archive.org versionThe Toughbook C1 impresses with its durability, speed, and comfort. Plus, this ultra-light tablet combines pen and touch input to give workers more flexibility. While you'll have to pay a bit more to get the best endurance, overall this is a killer convertible for those who are hard on their machines.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/19/2010
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Notebookjournal
DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/12/2011
Notes: performances: 80% équipement: 50% écran: 30% mobilité: 50% finition: 80% ergonomie: 50%
Source: Chip.de - 01/11

Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 12/01/2010
Notes: Note globale: 90% performances: 100% équipement: 78% écran: 74% mobilité: 100% ergonomie: 85%
Source: c't - 21/10

Comparaison, , Longue, Date: 10/01/2010
Notes: performances: 60% écran: 90% mobilité: 90% degré de nuisance: 40%
Source: Pc Tuner
IT→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longueur inconnue, Date: 12/21/2010
Commentaire
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics:
Seuls les vieux jeux peuvent tourner de façon fluide sur ces ordinateurs (S'ils ne sont pas trop gourmands en ressources). Les coeurs à mémoire partagée de cette catégorie ont l'avantage d'être moins chaud et moins gourmand en énergie. Pour le bureau, internet, l'édition de photos, et le montage vidéo ces cartes graphiques n'ont aucune restrictions.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
520M: Le Core i5-520M n'as que 3 Mo de cache L3 (comparé au I7-640M) et une fréquence de 2.4 à 2.93 GHz (Turbo Mode). Avec l'Hyperthreading, 4 cores sont gérés simultanément. La carte graphique intégrée (GMA HD 3150) et la RAM DDR3 sont dans le package.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.




