Samsung Galaxy A9 2016
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Samsung Galaxy A9 2016 (Galaxy Gamme)
Processeur
Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 8 x 1.8 GHz, Cortex-A72/-A53
Carte graphique
unknown
Écran
6.00 pouces 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel, brillant: oui
Poids
200 g
Price comparison
Note moyenne:
Moyenne de 3 notes (à partir de 4 critiques)
Moyenne de 3 notes (à partir de 4 critiques)
prix: 80%, performances: 87%, équipement: - %, écran: 87% mobilité: 92%, finition: 87%, ergonomie: - %, degré de nuisance: - %
Critiques pour le/la Samsung Galaxy A9 2016
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016) Review
Source: Phone Arena
EN→FR Archive.org version
The Galaxy A9 is an enormous, yet elegant smartphone. Looking across the board, it has no glaring weaknesses – its performance actually reflecting its price point rather well. You're not getting the best of the best here, but rather a very nice smartphone that won't disappoint in any area – it's just very good, not great. I think it's a fair deal, considering you won't be paying top dollar.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/12/2016
Notes: Note globale: 75%
Source: Phone Arena
EN→FR Archive.org versionThe Galaxy A9 is an enormous, yet elegant smartphone. Looking across the board, it has no glaring weaknesses – its performance actually reflecting its price point rather well. You're not getting the best of the best here, but rather a very nice smartphone that won't disappoint in any area – it's just very good, not great. I think it's a fair deal, considering you won't be paying top dollar.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/12/2016
Notes: Note globale: 75%
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016) review
Source: GSM Arena EN→FR Archive.org version
Samsung has put a lot of work into the new Galaxy A series and it's clear it wants to recreate the flagship success of the S and Note phones, except in a more attractive price bracket. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016) will be the face of the series - its size is an instant attention-grabber and its specs are better than the other A models. Sometimes the A9 has slightly better specs, other times the gap is significant. The clearest example is the chipset, it's essentially twice as fast as the S615 used in the A5 and A7 that we tested earlier. Here are our other impressions of the A9, summarized.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/19/2016
Source: GSM Arena
EN→FR Archive.org versionSamsung has put a lot of work into the new Galaxy A series and it's clear it wants to recreate the flagship success of the S and Note phones, except in a more attractive price bracket. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016) will be the face of the series - its size is an instant attention-grabber and its specs are better than the other A models. Sometimes the A9 has slightly better specs, other times the gap is significant. The clearest example is the chipset, it's essentially twice as fast as the S615 used in the A5 and A7 that we tested earlier. Here are our other impressions of the A9, summarized.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 02/19/2016
A premium mid-range smartphone that is a worthy flagship competitor
Source: Android Authority EN→FR Archive.org version
The Samsung Galaxy A9 can be found on Amazon priced at close to the $600 mark, which is quite steep, but given the flagship features this device provides, it does make sense. Available color options include silver, white, gold, and pink gold.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/11/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90% performances: 87% écran: 88% mobilité: 96% finition: 93%
Source: Android Authority
EN→FR Archive.org versionThe Samsung Galaxy A9 can be found on Amazon priced at close to the $600 mark, which is quite steep, but given the flagship features this device provides, it does make sense. Available color options include silver, white, gold, and pink gold.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/11/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90% performances: 87% écran: 88% mobilité: 96% finition: 93%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2016 recensione
Source: Andrea Galeazzi
IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/28/2016
Notes: Note globale: 81% prix: 80% écran: 85% mobilité: 88% finition: 80%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi
IT→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/28/2016
Notes: Note globale: 81% prix: 80% écran: 85% mobilité: 88% finition: 80%
Commentaire
unknown:
Ses cartes graphiques ne sont pas faites pour le jeu. Et même si ils tournent, ce sera avec des erreurs d'affichage et un framerate ignoble. Ce cartes graphique sont totalement incompatible avec les joueurs! les applications de bureau et d'Internet, ne sont pas un problème pour ces cartes graphiques.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
652 MSM8976:
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.
