Acer Aspire One 721
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable

Price comparison
Moyenne de 7 notes (à partir de 10 critiques)
Critiques pour le/la Acer Aspire One 721
Source: Techradar
EN→FR Archive.org versionWhile it might struggle with more complicated tasks, the solid build quality of the Acer Aspire One 721, plus its thin and light design and low price, make this a good choice as a basic study and work laptop. If you're after a more powerful machine for handling more complicated tasks, then the Lenovo G560 is the better choice.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 07/20/2011
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Liliputing
EN→FR Archive.org versionThe Acer Aspire One 721 isn't the fastest 11.6 inch laptop I've tested. It doesn't have the best graphics performance. And it doesn't have the longest battery life. But it's among the best performing laptops I've tested in its class, which is saying a lot since this machine is so much cheaper than the competition.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/29/2010
Notes: performances: 80% mobilité: 60%
Source: Hardware Central
EN→FR Archive.org versionAs is often the case with products that seem to bridge gaps between existing product lines, the AO721's biggest weakness is that it doesn't quite know what it wants to be. There are manufacturers, after all, who market similarly sized 11.6-inch systems as ultraportable notebooks rather than netbooks. In fact, Acer sells several. So where exactly is the line drawn?
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/22/2010
Notes: Note globale: 73% prix: 60% performances: 80% équipement: 80%
Source: Engadget
EN→FR Archive.org versionThough, if we had to choose we'd go with the 721 -- for $80 more than the 521 you get more than just a secondary machine with its wider screen and keyboard. Of course, if you consistently demand more than four hours of battery life you'll want to go with an Intel ULV laptop, but most of them cost north of $700. And well, that's exactly what AMD's going for -- Acer now has two incredibly affordable and portable laptops that pack more performance than most netbooks and budget ultraportables on the market.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/01/2010
Notes: prix: 90% performances: 80% mobilité: 80%
Source: SFT - 3/11

Comparaison, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 02/01/2011
Notes: Note globale: 93%
Source: SFT - 9/10

Comparaison, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 10/01/2010
Notes: Note globale: 93%
Source: Notebookcheck
DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/05/2010
Notes: Note globale: 86% performances: 66% écran: 78% mobilité: 91% finition: 89% ergonomie: 79% degré de nuisance: 89%
Source: Notebookjournal
DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/04/2010
Notes: Note globale: 70% prix: 90% performances: 90% équipement: 30% écran: 30% mobilité: 30% finition: 50% ergonomie: 50%
Source: c't - 14/10

Comparaison, , Longue, Date: 06/01/2010
Notes: performances: 55% écran: 70% mobilité: 70% degré de nuisance: 90%
Source: Techno Zoom
IT→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 09/10/2010
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 80% performances: 80% mobilité: 80% finition: 70%
Commentaire
ATI Radeon HD 4225:
Seuls les vieux jeux peuvent tourner de façon fluide sur ces ordinateurs (S'ils ne sont pas trop gourmands en ressources). Les coeurs à mémoire partagée de cette catégorie ont l'avantage d'être moins chaud et moins gourmand en énergie. Pour le bureau, internet, l'édition de photos, et le montage vidéo ces cartes graphiques n'ont aucune restrictions.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
K125:
Monocore bas de gamme pour portables pas chers. Plus rapide qu'un Atom 1.6Ghz.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.



