Acer Aspire S3-951-6646
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable

Price comparison
Moyenne de 15 notes (à partir de 21 critiques)
Critiques pour le/la Acer Aspire S3-951-6646
The first Ultrabook. Designed to directly tackle the MacBook Air for hundreds of dollars less, the Acer Aspire S3 has a lot to live up to. Find out here if this early Ultrabook has what it takes to take the ultrathin category crown away from Apple.
Source: Blogeee
 Archive.org versionAcer m’a fait une bonne surprise il y a quelques jours. Avant de s’envoler vers Berlin et l’IFA, l’équipe de la marque m’a proposé de me prêter pour une poignée d’heures son prototype d’Ultrabook S3. Un engin d’un nouveau genre qui, même si il affiche une diagonale de 13.3″, préfigure une belle mobilité. Un petit aperçu de la bête sous tous les angles avant un test plus complet d’une version série très bientôt.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/05/2011
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: T Break
 EN→FR Archive.org versionOverall, the Asipre S3 is a good machine, however, it does not feel like a new category of a laptop. Yes, it it quite slim and wakes up and connects to your Wi-Fi fast along with offering a decent battery life and decent performance- but that is certainly not something unheard of. I think Intel should have made some more things mandatory for the Ultrabook platform- such as an SSD and a higher resolution screen.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/12/2011
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: PC Authority
 EN→FR Archive.org versionThe Ultrabook has landed and it delivers on the promise of ultra-thin and light computing for a reasonable price.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 12/07/2011
Notes: Note globale: 83% prix: 100% performances: 83% équipement: 83% ergonomie: 83%
Source: PC World
 EN→FR Archive.org versionIn the end, the Acer Aspire S3 attempts to be an affordable, visually attractive, and usable Ultrabook. It only partly meets those goals. The keyboard is mostly good, but the laptop's mediocre audio quality, lack of high-speed USB, shorter-than-average battery life, and modest performance make it less than appealing. Still, if you need a very thin, very light Windows PC for mostly nondemanding office and Web chores, the Aspire S3 may suit you.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 11/17/2011
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Good Gear Guide
 EN→FR Archive.org versionWhile Acer is the first vendor to get its Ultrabook 'out there', the Aspire S3 unfortunately suffers from a lack of features and just feels a little underdone overall. It could use a backlit keyboard, some more connectivity (such as USB 3.0 and Gigabit Ethernet) and we think a solid state drive should be standard for the price you're paying.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/07/2011
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Wired Magazine
 EN→FR Archive.org versionThe bottom line is that with this ultrabook, Acer is at least sending a message that real price competition can exist in this rarefied category of notebooks. Whether that will actually amount to a real price war is still an open question, but if nothing else, this category has at least become one worth watching now.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 10/18/2011
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: PC Mag
 EN→FR Archive.org versionThe Acer Aspire S3 is the first ultrabook we've seen, so it's a bit early to tell where it fits within the overall category. It has some definite high points, like a super thin profile, larger storage capacity, and affordability that is currently unmatched. But it also rang hollow on a few important notes: the build quality simply feels cheap, despite the magnesium lid, and the screen doesn't offer the same resolution offered by competitors. At the moment, the MacBook Air 13-inch or the Editors' Choice Toshiba Portege R835-P50X are stronger choices, but the ultrabook landscape will be changing rapidly, so stay tuned.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/15/2011
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Engadget
 EN→FR Archive.org versionWe wanted to love the Acer Aspire S3, the same way we're rooting for all of these reasonably priced, impossibly skinny, long-lasting laptops that have the potential to give the MacBook Air a run for its money. Indeed, it's priced aggressively -- $200 less than the UX31 and $400 off the 13-inch Air.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/14/2011
Source: CNet
 EN→FR Archive.org versionCall us skeptical (please do, we like it), but the Ultrabook concept always struck us as being a bit suspect. Intel has been pushing for several months the idea of a new class of laptops that are slim and powerful with excellent battery life. The Acer Aspire S3 is the closest you can get to the look and feel of a MacBook Air for less than $1,000, but it requires a few compromises.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/14/2011
Notes: Note globale: 80% performances: 80% mobilité: 70%
Source: Laptop Mag
 EN→FR Archive.org versionPriced at $899, it's clear that Acer is trying to undercut its Ultrabook competitors, but in doing so, it had to make a few sacrifices. For example, the Aspire S3's chassis is plastic, not metal, and it has a mechanical hard drive, not an SSD. It's also missing the little niceties, such as a high-res display and a backlit keyboard. While we might be willing to compromise on those issues, the one area where we can't compromise is battery life, and unfortunately the S3 falls way short in that category. The less-sexy ASUS U36SD is also less than an inch thick, and it offers much better performance and 8 hours of battery life for around the same price as the S3. Or, for just $200 more, you can get ASUS' Zenbook UX31, which has a higher-res screen and a powerful 256GB SSD.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/12/2011
Notes: Note globale: 50%
Source: PC Go - 4/12

Comparaison, , De taille moyenne, Date: 03/01/2012
Notes: Note globale: 68%
Source: ZDNet
 DE→FR Archive.org versionComparaison, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/06/2011
Source: Connect - 1/12

Critique simple, , Longue, Date: 12/01/2011
Notes: Note globale: 80% équipement: 80% ergonomie: 80%
Source: PC Welt
 DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/03/2011
Notes: Note globale: 74% performances: 67% équipement: 71% écran: 74% mobilité: 80% ergonomie: 89% degré de nuisance: 82%
Source: Computerbild - 24/11

Critique simple, , Longue, Date: 11/01/2011
Notes: Note globale: 88% performances: 95% équipement: 83% écran: 87% ergonomie: 83% degré de nuisance: 89%
Source: Notebookcheck
 DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/31/2011
Notes: Note globale: 76% performances: 74% écran: 68% mobilité: 83% finition: 80% ergonomie: 84% degré de nuisance: 88%
Source: ZDNet
 DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/21/2011
Notes: Note globale: 72% prix: 80% performances: 70% mobilité: 60% ergonomie: 80%
Source: 3DNews.ru
 RU→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/17/2011
Source: Hi-Tech Mail
 RU→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/17/2011
Source: Laptop.bg
 BU→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/12/2011
Source: Notegear
 KO→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/15/2011
Commentaire
Intel HD Graphics 3000:
3 GPUs à venir (1er Trimestre 2011) intégrés aux CPU Intel Sandy Bridge (Core ix-2xxx). Les 3000 / 200 correspondent à la puce GT2 avec 12 Execution Units (EUs).
Seuls les vieux jeux peuvent tourner de façon fluide sur ces ordinateurs (S'ils ne sont pas trop gourmands en ressources). Les coeurs à mémoire partagée de cette catégorie ont l'avantage d'être moins chaud et moins gourmand en énergie. Pour le bureau, internet, l'édition de photos, et le montage vidéo ces cartes graphiques n'ont aucune restrictions.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
2467M: Processeur économique en énergie ULV cadencé entre 1.6 et 2.3 GHz avec Turbo Boost. Possède le GPU intégré HD 3000 cadencé à 350 / 1200 MHz avec un contrôleur mémoire DDR3-1333.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.


