Asus G74SX-91079V
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable

Price comparison
Moyenne de 5 notes (à partir de 6 critiques)
Critiques pour le/la Asus G74SX-91079V
G74 reloaded. After already having taken a closer look at a US variant of the Asus benchmark gaming notebook several months ago, we are now providing a review update for the German version somewhat belatedly. Does the G74 still belong among the elite?
Source: Hardwareheaven
EN→FR Archive.org versionFrom the moment we unboxed the G74Sx it was clear that ASUS were aiming to outdo Alienware in the enthusiast laptop marketplace and we were off to a good start with solid feeling chassis, soft touch coating and some futuristic styling (though ASUS prefer Stealth Fighter comparisons).
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/04/2011
Notes: Note globale: 100% prix: 90% performances: 90% finition: 100%
Source: Tech Advisor
EN→FR Archive.org versionThis "mobile" gaming machine really does have everything you need for on-the-go power-computing, even though it weighs almost as much as a lightweight desktop. Asus packs a lot of power into the Asus G74SX, and the system has a fairly svelte body to boot. Now, if only we can get a review model that doesn't have a faulty LED backlight.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 08/23/2011
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Tech2.in.com
EN→FR Archive.org versionFor a price of Rs.1,24,990, the Asus G74SX offers good value when you consider what you’re getting. A similarly spec’d Alienware would cost you about 30K more, so keeping that in mind, Asus offers better value for money. But they’ve still not rectified some basic problems that were present with the earlier models. The main issue is the lack of a physical toggle switch for the 3D mode. I want the choice to switch it on and off when I please, without having to run to the control panel every single time. Also, there’s no way to adjust the depth of the 3D effect while gaming. Finally, Asus gives you plenty of choices and configurations for all the components, leaving aside the most important one, the graphics card. The GTX 560M is a powerful card, no doubt, but it’s not enough for 3D, which is quite clear from the benchmarks. These are a few, but crucial areas, which stops the G74SX from being a clear winner.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/03/2011
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Overclockers.at
DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/28/2011
Source: Notebookcheck
DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/10/2011
Notes: Note globale: 89% performances: 91% écran: 90% mobilité: 56% finition: 90% ergonomie: 85% degré de nuisance: 88%
Source: Notebookjournal
DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/23/2011
Notes: performances: 65% équipement: 30% écran: 100% mobilité: 60% finition: 90% ergonomie: 70%
Commentaire
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M: Successeur de la GeForce GTX 460M basée sur la puce GF116. Les performances sont 13% au dessus de la 460M, avec une consommation comparable.
Ces cartes devraient être capables de faire tourner tout les jeux d'aujourd'hui, mais la plupart d'entre eux uniquement en détails moyens ou faibles et avec des résolution basses. Les plus vieux jeux ou les jeux moins gourmands restent jouables avec de beaux graphismes.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
2630QM:
Puissant Quad-core avec une architecture Sandy Bridge architecture avec une carte graphique intégrée et de la RAM dual-channel DDR3.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.





