Samsung Q320-Aura P8700

Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable

Price comparison

Critiques pour le/la Samsung Q320-Aura P8700

80% Samsung Q320
Source: Digital Versus EN→FR Archive.org version
According to Samsung, the Q320 “is ideal for style-conscious students or power hungry business users who need to keep in touch on the move.” And with its 13.4” display and black shell, the Q320 is indeed a handsome machine. And with a configuration to match, this notebook is a good, relatively mobile all-around partner. Fully equipped and nicely finished, the Samsung Q320 is a good notebook computer if you want to stay away from the bulkiness of the new 15.6” models. Unfortunately its glossy LCD panel is of poor quality, and its sound is very disappointing. Performance is decent and good enough for all-around use

Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/20/2009
Notes: Note globale: 80%

100% Samsung Q320
Source: PC Pro EN→FR Archive.org version
Samsung's Q320 is a fine example of the increasingly popular 13.3in laptop. It walks the fine line between Apple's minimalism and the attention-seeking gloss of dearer laptops, with the glossy black lid contrasting attractively against a matte-black interior and subtle chrome highlights. Blends portability and finesse with an impressively affordable asking price3
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/02/2009
Notes: Note globale: 100% prix: 100% performances: 83%

80% Samsung Q320 review
Source: Tech Advisor EN→FR Archive.org version
At £670 the Samsung Q320 poses strong competition for other well-equipped 13in notebooks, such as the Dell Studio XPS 13. Samsung's model has a little more muscle than that, but it isn't quite as stylish. Overall, the NP-Q320 is a pretty good value for a general-purpose laptop. This machine is a bit heavier than most 13in models, but it's compact and lightweight enough to carry around all day at school or work, big enough to work on easily, handsome enough not to walk around with in public, and fast enough to be your primary computer. If the screen were better, the Samsung NP-Q320 would be an outstanding bargain.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/14/2009
Notes: Note globale: 80%

77% Samsung NP-Q320
Source: PC World EN→FR Archive.org version
For many people, the pricing sweet spot for the perfect laptop is between $800 and $1000. Full-fledged yet svelte, Samsung's NP-Q320 all-purpose notebook ($949 as of September 10, 2009) has the muscle to serve as your primary work/school/home computer. The laptop is compact and light enough (4.8 pounds) not to break your back, it has a 13.4-inch screen that you don't need to squint at, and it's powerful enough to run most major applications well. Still, this nice all-purpose laptop suffers from a couple of minor usability problems.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/11/2009
Notes: Note globale: 77% performances: 78% équipement: 79%

60% Samsung Q320
Source: Laptop Mag EN→FR Archive.org version
Samsung’s latest 13-inch notebook offers strong performance for the price, but we’d prefer longer battery life. At first glance, Q320 seems like a bargain, because it is significantly less expensive than 13-inch competitors with discrete graphics, such as the Dell Studio XPS 13 ($1,354) and Sony VAIO SR Series ($1,359). Unfortunately, a hefty frame and short battery life make the notebook less portable than we’d like, and multimedia playback could be better. If you’re willing to sacrifice discrete graphics, the Toshiba Satellite U505 ($799) is $130 cheaper. Nevertheless, if you’re looking for copious processing power and good graphics performance in a 13-inch chassis, the Q320 makes a solid choice at a compelling price.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/04/2009
Notes: Note globale: 60%

80% Samsung Q320 review
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version

Samsung's Q320 is a highly portable laptop offering quality and usability without compromises. If you're in the market for a highly portable laptop, whether it's for business or home use, we're confident you'll struggle to find a better machine than the Samsung Q320. Comfortable, well made and surprisingly powerful, it comes highly recommended.

80
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/09/2009
Notes: Note globale: 80%

90% Samsung Q320-Aura P8700
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
This is a well considered and classy step-forward from its predecessor. While the Q310 was overly flashy and slightly gaudy, the Q320 is more restrained and offers a look and feel that surpasses its affordable price. This view can be applied to its feature set and performance as well, making this a stonking bargain that's perfect for anyone who needs a little portability without sacrificing performance.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/19/2009
Notes: Note globale: 90% performances: 80% équipement: 80%

Test Samsung Q320 Notebook
Source: Notebookcheck DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/20/2009
Notes: écran: 40% degré de nuisance: 40%

80% Samsung Q320-Aura P8700 Balin Subnotebook
Source: Minitechnet DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/03/2009
Notes: Note globale: 80% performances: 80% équipement: 80% écran: 60% mobilité: 80% finition: 100% ergonomie: 100%

80% Samsung Q320-Aura P8700 Balin
Source: Notebookjournal DE→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/30/2009
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 70% performances: 60% équipement: 50% écran: 40% mobilité: 70% finition: 90% ergonomie: 70%

85% Samsung Q320
Source: PC World Italia IT→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/21/2009
Notes: Note globale: 85%

Commentaire

NVIDIA GeForce G 105M:

9300M GS cadencée plus rapidement et donc un peu plus rapide. Toujours fabriquée en 65nm. Supporte Hybrid-SLI avec HybridPower et GeForceBoost (en association avec le bon chipset Nvidia).

Seuls les vieux jeux peuvent tourner de façon fluide sur ces ordinateurs (S'ils ne sont pas trop gourmands en ressources). Les coeurs à mémoire partagée de cette catégorie ont l'avantage d'être moins chaud et moins gourmand en énergie. Pour le bureau, internet, l'édition de photos, et le montage vidéo ces cartes graphiques n'ont aucune restrictions.

>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.

Intel Core 2 Duo:

C'est le successeur du Core Duo avec des pipelines 5-20% plus rapides sans consommation supplémentaire. Comme une addition à la conception du core duo là existe un quatrième décodeur, une SSE-unité amplifiée et une unité logique arithmétique additionnelle (ALU). Le core 2 duo pour ordinateurs portables est identique aux processeurs de core 2 duo d'ordinateur de bureau mais les portables fonctionnent avec des tensions inférieures et une vitesse de Frontside. L'exécution des portables également synchronisés est 20-25% inférieure à des ordinateur de bureau en raison de fréquence d’horloge inférieure de Frontside et plus lents de disques durs.

P8700: Un CPU de milieu de gamme avec 3 Mo de cache de niveau 3 et un TDP de 25 Watt.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.

Ordinateurs portables similaires d'autres fabricants et/ou avec un processeur différent

Ordinateurs portables avec les mêmes diagonale d'écran et/ou poids