Sony Xperia X Compact
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable

Appareil photo secondaire: 5 MPix f/2.4, capteur Exmor-R 1/2.3", angle large 25 mm
Price comparison
Moyenne de 53 notes (à partir de 102 critiques)
Critiques pour le/la Sony Xperia X Compact
Compact et endurant mais le haut de gamme, c'est du passé Sony propose à nouveau une version Compact de son smartphone phare cette année. Mais le petit modèle devra faire avec des composants plus lents, désormais. Notre compte-rendu montre en quoi ce n'est pas forcément un problème.
Source: Les Mobiles
 Archive.org version
 Archive.org versionNous sommes évidemment un peu nostalgiques de l’ancienne ligne Compact qui montraient qu’il était possible de proposer un flagship petit format. Nous avons souvent pensé que la sortie de l’iPhone SE aurait eu pour effet de dynamiser la concurrence sur le segment des petits superphones ou les Compact trônaient. Cela a été finalement le contraire : les marques ont préféré faire des concessions sur la fiche technique pour baisser le prix. C’est dommage.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/12/2017
Notes: Note globale: 76%
Source: Top for Phone
 Archive.org version
 Archive.org versionA tel point qu’on ne peut que vous le recommander, sans l’ombre d’une hésitation, en indiquant qu’il s’agit de LA référence.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/02/2017
Source: CNet France
 Archive.org version
 Archive.org versionL’Xperia X Compact est un petit smartphone doté d’un excellent appareil photo. Mais il lui manque quelques éléments de confort comme l’étanchéité.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/16/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.fr
 Archive.org version
 Archive.org versionGrâce à sa taille, ce nouveau Xperia X Compact semble pouvoir trouver son public sans qu'une grande campagne marketing soit nécessaire. Il est évident qu'il succède au Z5 Compact mais la transition est légère. Le processeur de milieu de gamme le bloque dans son évolution. L'appareil a su nous surprendre avec son écran, mais il a aussi su nous décevoir avec l'abandon de l'étanchéité. Son autonomie et sa petite taille l'aideront à gagner le coeur des utilisateurs les moins exigeants en performances.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/24/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Phonandroid
 Archive.org version
 Archive.org versionCe Xperia X Compact nous a moins entousiasmé que son prédécesseur, mais reste un bon smartphone au format 4,6 pouces qui se veut plus acessible que le Xperia Z5 Compact au niveau du prix, quite à faire des concessions sur certains points. Destiné avant tout à ceux qui ne supportent pas les grands écrans et qui ne recherchent pas (ou plus) un mobile haut de gamme.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/16/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Frandroid
 Archive.org version
 Archive.org versionDites voir, faisons un petit bilan de ce qu'on a sous les yeux. Le Xperia X Compact possède une puce moins cotée que celle qui animait le Z5 Compact, un appareil photo à peu près similaire, un écran identique, une interface logicielle inchangée, et si l'on gagne un USB-C, c'est au détriment de l'étanchéité.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 09/16/2016
Source: AndroidPit.fr
 Archive.org version
 Archive.org versionGrâce à sa taille, ce nouveau Compact semble pouvoir trouver son public sans qu'une grande campagne marketing soit nécessaire. Nous ne pouvons pas dire avec certitude que le Xperia X Compact est à la hauteur de la réputation de ses successeurs. Le processeur de milieu de gamme est clairement un point faible, même le Z5 Compact propose mieux alors qu'il est bien plus vieux (et bien moins cher). Apparemment, l'appareil photo est plutôt réussi, c'est peut-être l'argument principal de ce X Compact qui lui permettra de remplacer son prédécesseur.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 09/02/2016
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Techradar
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionSony's X Compact is the best-looking yet in the small range. However, the quest to attract more eyes brought about a few too many sacrifices. Compared to the Z5 Compact, it's a slightly underpowered and fragile offering.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 08/07/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Techradar
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionSony's X Compact is the best-looking yet in the small range. However, the quest to attract more eyes brought about a few too many sacrifices. Compared to the Z5 Compact, it's a slightly underpowered and fragile offering.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/15/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Techradar
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionSony's X Compact is the best-looking yet in the small range. However, the quest to attract more eyes brought about a few too many sacrifices. Compared to the Z5 Compact, it's a slightly underpowered and fragile offering.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/08/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Gadgetspeak
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionHaving recently told you about the larger Xperia XZ here a chance to put the smaller sibling through its paces, like the larger offering both were supplied by Vodafone and with this I got the chance to check their coverage not only in England but also Scotland.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 03/01/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 60% performances: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Laptop Media
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionWhen we are talking about Android smartphones, it is difficult to find models with screen size less than 5 inches as the 5.5-inch diagonal is growing ever more popular. We believe that there certainly is a group of users who still prefer more compact devices. These who provide not only comfortable grip with one hand but also the ability to easily operate with this very hand. Usually, when we are discussing a compact smartphone it’s most likely a budget offer. Xperia X Compact, however, is something different.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/21/2017
Source: Tech Smart
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionDespite proving solid in all departments, the X compact has arrived a little late on the scene. It's no fault of the phone, however, but simply a fact that it was released alongside the XZ flagship and is not specced in a similar fashion, as has been the trend for previous versions of Xperia compact devices, like the Z1 and Z1 Compact. As such, instead of users hoping for a smaller version of the XZ top of the range offering, what they actually have is a smaller version of the mid-range X with an improved camera.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/06/2016
Source: GSM Arena
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionTo wrap things up, the Sony Xperia X Compact is a great small smartphone. If you look beyond the specs sheet, this is one of the best small phones you can buy. It has a capable camera that, in good light, would capture photos with unrivaled detail. It's got a top build quality, an excellent screen, a snappy, well-placed fingerprint reader, stereo speakers and a solid processor.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/22/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70% performances: 100% écran: 80% mobilité: 80% finition: 50%
Source: Soycincau
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionThere’s simply no meaningful competition for Sony or the Xperia X Compact right now. They’re king. If you want a “flagship” compact Android phone, your hands are tied because this is really your only real option right now. So either you get something that has a larger screen or prepare to pony up for the X Compact.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/09/2016
Source: Brighthand
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionThe hardware keeps the Sony Xperia X Compact out of the flagship space, but it’s still one of the best devices smaller than five inches on the market. Its long-lasting battery deserves the most praise, and we also like its modern design, attractive display, and decent performance.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/08/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: CNet
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionSony's Xperia X Compact is a small phone with an excellent camera, but it lacks some creature comforts, like waterproofing and, in the US, a fingerprint sensor.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/26/2016
Notes: Note globale: 75% performances: 70% mobilité: 70% finition: 80%
Source: T Break
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionWhether the Sony Xperia X Compact is truly a successor to the previous Xperia Z5 Compact is a very tricky question. The new device does bring in a new appealing design that feels more comfortable to hold, faster fingerprint scanning, better cameras that produce cleaner images, and amazing predictive autofocusing with 5-axis stabilization for videos. Despite having a less powerful processor, the performance of the device is also good.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/12/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90% prix: 85% performances: 85% équipement: 85% finition: 90%
Source: Trusted Reviews
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionThe Sony Xperia X Compact is far from the worst Android phone I've used this year, even if it is one of the ugliest. If you want an Android phone with a display size smaller than 5 inches then it’s probably your only choice. Widen your horizons, however, and there are better choices out there.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/11/2016
Notes: Note globale: 60% prix: 60% performances: 70% écran: 80% mobilité: 80% finition: 50%
Source: Tech Advisor
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionThe Sony Xperia X Compact is an odd little smartphone. On the one hand its build quality, lack of waterproofing and lack of a standout feature make it harder to recommend compared to the older Xperia Z5 Compact. However, if you want a sub-5in Android smartphone with excellent battery life it’s the best current option out there. For all its flaws, we also kept coming back to the phone largely due to its sheer portability. Just don’t buy the blue one.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/06/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70% prix: 70% performances: 70% équipement: 80% finition: 70%
Source: Tom's Guide
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionStill, $500 is a lot to pay for a phone whose camera doesn't perform as well in low light as Sony promises. It's also not as speedy as phones that are cheaper. Overall, we prefer the Honor 8 and OnePlus 3, both of which cost $100 less than the compact Xperia. But if you value battery life in a compact design, Sony's latest phone may fit the bill.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/29/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: PC Mag
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionThe Sony Xperia X Compact is a capable midrange phone with a good camera, but at $500, it's priced higher than most of its competition, including our Editors' Choice for compact phones, the Apple iPhone SE. For $100 less the SE gets you a more powerful processor, a fingerprint scanner, and Apple's superior app ecosystem. If Apple is out the question, the $400 ZTE Axon 7 also gets you a faster processor and a fingerprint sensor, as well as a much sharper display. But it's significantly larger than the X Compact, and not ideal for one-handed use. That makes the X Compact one of the best compact Android phones you can buy, though you'll get a lot more bang for your buck by going larger.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 09/28/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Expert Reviews
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionEqually, though, the X Compact is a disappointment in other areas. It’s nowhere near as nice a thing as the Z5 Compact, it’s not as quick and it isn’t water-resistant, either. All things told, I still prefer the Z5 Compact, even more so now that the two phones are now on sale for around the same price.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/27/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Recombu
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionSony’s Xperia X Compact isn’t much of an evolution over last year’s Xperia Z5 Compact, offering up pretty much the same performance and battery life while also stripping away water resistance and 4K video recording. Considering it’s about the same price, that means existing owners have no need to upgrade.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/26/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Android Authority
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionThe Xperia X Compact is a great phone, and if you choose to buy one, you certainly won’t be disappointed. However, without a fingerprint sensor (with the US version), or features like dust and water resistance, the $500 price tag is hard to accept, just for the convenience that its size offers. If you are looking for the best value for money, this phone isn’t the one to get, but if you just want a compact phone that doesn’t compromise a whole lot, that’s when you might find this device to be worth every penny.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/26/2016
Notes: Note globale: 84% performances: 90% écran: 80% mobilité: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Techradar
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionSony's X Compact is the best-looking yet in the small range. However, the quest to attract more eyes brought about a few too many sacrifices. Compared to the Z5 Compact, it's a slightly underpowered and fragile offering.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/22/2016
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Android Central
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionThe Xperia X Compact gives you everything you need in terms of screen, performance, battery life — plus a few nice additions like stereo speakers, a slick software experience and Sony's latest camera technology. But this isn't simply a flagship-level phone in a smaller size: you're getting a plastic phone that's also missing a fingerprint sensor and waterproofing. So for as great as the X Compact is, it sits in an odd area — offering you less than other phones, but still commanding a $499 price. You really have to want a small phone to spend that much on the X Compact.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/22/2016
Source: Phone Arena
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionAs far as the competition goes, the X Compact is really in a niche of its own right now. There's the cheaper but similarly sized Samsung Galaxy A3 (2016), which has a 4.7” display, a fancier styling, decent camera, and fine battery life, though considerably less-potent hardware. Looking away from Android, the 4.7” iPhone 6 can be found at a similar price point today, and can actually get you much more phone for the money. In the X Compact's $450-$500 range, however, there is little in Android's small-and-strong category but its predecessor, the Z5 Compact, which happens to be a more powerful handset, at a lower price right now.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/21/2016
Notes: Note globale: 68%
Source: GSM Arena
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionIf you want the compact version of the Xperia X Compact review, here it goes. Sony hasn't given up on the concept of high-powered minis, just toned it down a notch. A few signature features have gone missing, yes, but then again so have the rivals in this admittedly niche category. Price has been adjusted accordingly too, and for those who still find it steep a few months of patience could well be worth it.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 09/17/2016
Source: PC Mag
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionThe Xperia X Compact will be available in the US starting September 25. Pricing has not yet been announced, but the lesser specs in play here will be a lot easier to swallow if they come at a significantly reduced price. Check back soon for more info, as well as a full review when the phone is available.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 09/01/2016
Source: Pocket Lint
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionThe Sony Xperia X Compact is over-shadowed by the devices that have come before it carrying the same name. The Compact was once the de facto choice for those wanting a smaller device that doesn't compromise on the power it offers, for flagship performance.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/01/2016
Source: Stuff TV
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionFrom what we've seen so far, the Xperia X Compact looks set to be the best miniature handset around. It's no surprise really, given Sony's past commitment to cramming in respectable specs into a small-screened device.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 09/01/2016
Source: Trusted Reviews
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionBeing someone who's used each iteration of the Xperia Compact over the years, I’m a little disappointed by the latest version. By ditching the theme of presenting high-end specs in a small body, Sony has simply ended up with a small mid-range phone that doesn’t really do anything differently. It isn't water-resistant, it doesn’t have the same specs as the Xperia flagships, and it's truly ugly to boot.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 09/01/2016
Source: Expert Reviews
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionIf you don’t fancy shelling out for a full-priced flagship, your options are a mid-range device from one of the big manufacturers, or grabbing a bargain device from OnePlus or the Nexus ranges. Come October, though, and you’ll also be able to choose the Xperia X Compact. If prices are reasonable, and that camera is as good as Sony claims, this little smartphone could be a shoo-in for one of the best compact phones of 2016.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/01/2016
Source: International Business Times
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionUnlike the metal-backed XZ, the Compact has a glass back which is the same colour as its glass front and metal sides. Despite its smaller size and expected lower cost, the X Compact is still clearly a flagship phone with the looks, performance and camera to match. It has the same 23-megapixel rear camera and the same smart charging technology as the XZ. The processor if the X Compact is the Snapdragon 650, whereas the XZ uses the higher-spec 820.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/01/2016
Source: Android Mag
 DE→FR Archive.org version
 DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/28/2017
Notes: performances: 100% équipement: 100% écran: 80% mobilité: 60% finition: 60%
Source: Cyberbloc
 DE→FR Archive.org version
 DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/26/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Area DVD
 DE→FR Archive.org version
 DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/08/2016
Source: Billiger-telefonieren.de
 DE→FR Archive.org version
 DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/15/2016
Source: Verivox
 DE→FR Archive.org version
 DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/11/2016
Notes: Note globale: 67% équipement: 63% ergonomie: 74%
Source: WinFuture
 DE→FR Archive.org version
 DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/02/2016
Source: Inside Handy
 DE→FR Archive.org version
 DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/02/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Connect - Heft 12/2016

Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 11/01/2016
Source: Smartphone Magazin - Heft 1/2017

Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 11/01/2016
Source: Teltarif
 DE→FR Archive.org version
 DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/17/2016
Notes: Note globale: 87% équipement: 85% finition: 92% ergonomie: 87%
Source: Computerbase
 DE→FR Archive.org version
 DE→FR Archive.org versionComparaison, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/11/2016
Source: PCtipp.ch
 DE→FR Archive.org version
 DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/10/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Futurezone.at
 DE→FR Archive.org version
 DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/08/2016
Source: n-tv
 DE→FR Archive.org version
 DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/05/2016
Source: Android Pit
 DE→FR Archive.org version
 DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/01/2016
Source: e-media - Heft 11/2016

Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 10/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Curved
 DE→FR Archive.org version
 DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/29/2016
Notes: Note globale: 82% performances: 84% écran: 75% mobilité: 84%
Source: Blick
 DE→FR Archive.org version
 DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/27/2016
Source: Chip.de
 DE→FR Archive.org version
 DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/23/2016
Notes: Note globale: 89% prix: 86% performances: 94% équipement: 86% écran: 88% mobilité: 87%
Source: A1 Blog
 DE→FR Archive.org version
 DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/08/2016
Source: Android Pit
 DE→FR Archive.org version
 DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/01/2016
Source: Curved
 DE→FR Archive.org version
 DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/01/2016
Source: Computerbild - Heft 19/2016

Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 08/15/2016
Source: Zona Movilidad
 ES→FR Archive.org version
 ES→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/18/2017
Source: Movil Zona
 ES→FR Archive.org version
 ES→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/04/2016
Notes: Note globale: 75%
Source: Tuexperto
 ES→FR Archive.org version
 ES→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/01/2016
Source: El Androide Libre
 ES→FR Archive.org version
 ES→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/31/2016
Notes: Note globale: 82%
Source: Computerhoy
 ES→FR Archive.org version
 ES→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/22/2016
Notes: Note globale: 81% prix: 70% équipement: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 80% finition: 60%
Source: Andro 4 All
 ES→FR Archive.org version
 ES→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/19/2016
Notes: Note globale: 84%
Source: Techstation.it
 IT→FR Archive.org version
 IT→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 06/12/2017
Source: Ridble
 IT→FR Archive.org version
 IT→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/19/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Batista70Phone
 IT→FR Archive.org version
 IT→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/24/2016
Notes: Note globale: 76% prix: 50% écran: 80% mobilité: 90% ergonomie: 100%
Source: AndroidPit.it
 IT→FR Archive.org version
 IT→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/17/2016
Notes: Note globale: 85% prix: 75% équipement: 80% écran: 90% mobilité: 80% ergonomie: 80%
Source: HDblog.it
 IT→FR Archive.org version
 IT→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/10/2016
Notes: Note globale: 82%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android
 IT→FR Archive.org version
 IT→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/10/2016
Notes: performances: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 70% finition: 70%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi
 IT→FR Archive.org version
 IT→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/26/2016
Notes: Note globale: 85% prix: 79% écran: 82% mobilité: 82% finition: 86%
Source: AndroidPit.it
 IT→FR Archive.org version
 IT→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/07/2016
Source: Computer Totaal
 NL→FR Archive.org version
 NL→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/21/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: All About Phones
 NL→FR Archive.org version
 NL→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/15/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: GadgetGear.nl
 NL→FR Archive.org version
 NL→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/09/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl
 NL→FR Archive.org version
 NL→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/02/2016
Source: Bright.nl
 NL→FR Archive.org version
 NL→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/23/2016
Source: GadgetGear.nl
 NL→FR Archive.org version
 NL→FR Archive.org versionComparaison, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/02/2016
Source: One Tech
 PL→FR Archive.org version
 PL→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/24/2016
Source: Gry.wm.pl
 PL→FR Archive.org version
 PL→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/19/2016
Source: Komorkomania
 PL→FR Archive.org version
 PL→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/08/2016
Source: Spiders Web
 PL→FR Archive.org version
 PL→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/20/2016
Source: 90 Sekund
 PL→FR Archive.org version
 PL→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/19/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70% performances: 90% équipement: 60% mobilité: 90% finition: 50%
Source: Android.com.pl
 PL→FR Archive.org version
 PL→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 09/28/2016
Source: Spiders Web
 PL→FR Archive.org version
 PL→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/24/2016
Source: Tabletowo
 PL→FR Archive.org version
 PL→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/19/2016
Notes: Note globale: 84% performances: 90% écran: 90% mobilité: 90% finition: 75%
Source: Antyweb
 PL→FR Archive.org version
 PL→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/19/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Hi-Tech Mail
 RU→FR Archive.org version
 RU→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/01/2016
Source: Ferra.ru
 RU→FR Archive.org version
 RU→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/20/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Product Test
 RU→FR Archive.org version
 RU→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/01/2016
Source: Svet Androida
 CZ→FR Archive.org version
 CZ→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/19/2017
Source: CNews.cz
 CZ→FR Archive.org version
 CZ→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 01/31/2017
Source: CZC
 CZ→FR Archive.org version
 CZ→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 11/19/2016
Notes: Note globale: 75%
Source: The Gioididong
 VN→FR Archive.org version
 VN→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/09/2016
Source: Tek.no
 NO→FR Archive.org version
 NO→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/28/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Mere Mobil.dk
 DA→FR Archive.org version
 DA→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/30/2016
Source: Mere Mobil.dk
 DA→FR Archive.org version
 DA→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/30/2016
Source: Mobilsiden.dk
 DA→FR Archive.org version
 DA→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 09/20/2016
Notes: Note globale: 67%
Source: Mobil DK
 DA→FR Archive.org version
 DA→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/19/2016
Notes: Note globale: 84% écran: 80% mobilité: 90% finition: 80%
Source: M3 PC för alla
 SV→FR Archive.org version
 SV→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/23/2016
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Mobil.se
 SV→FR Archive.org version
 SV→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/20/2016
Notes: Note globale: 76% performances: 70%
Source: Techbox
 SK→FR Archive.org version
 SK→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/04/2016
Notes: Note globale: 94%
Commentaire
Qualcomm Adreno 510:
Carte graphique intégrée basée sur l'architecture Adreno 500 tout comme l'Adreno 520 du SoC Qualcomm Snapdragon 820. Les performances devraient être de l'ordre de celles de l'ancien Adreno 330 du Snapdragon 801. Prend en charge les instructions DirectX12, OpenCL 2.0, OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE.
Seuls les vieux jeux peuvent tourner de façon fluide sur ces ordinateurs (S'ils ne sont pas trop gourmands en ressources). Les coeurs à mémoire partagée de cette catégorie ont l'avantage d'être moins chaud et moins gourmand en énergie. Pour le bureau, internet, l'édition de photos, et le montage vidéo ces cartes graphiques n'ont aucune restrictions.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
650 MSM8956: 
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.
