Asus G51J
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable

Price comparison
Moyenne de 7 notes (à partir de 10 critiques)
Critiques pour le/la Asus G51J
Source: CNet
EN→FR Archive.org version3D may have first gained popularity in the cinemas of the 1950s, but -- like it or not -- it's also a part of your future. The technology is enjoying a comeback in the realms of TV, handheld games consoles and now laptops. The Asus G51J 3D is the first laptop to incorporate Nvidia's 3D Vision technology. If you absolutely love the idea of 3D gaming, this proof-of-concept system will work well as a pricey showpiece
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 04/30/2010
Notes: Note globale: 79%
Source: Tech2.in.com
EN→FR Archive.org versionHailing from Asus’ Republic Of Gamers series and equipped with Nvidia’s 3D Vision technology and powerful hardware, the Asus G51J gives a different dimension to gaming, in the true sense. It’s a mean machine with a rich feature set, but can it handle the intensive rendering when it comes to 3D gaming? Let’s find out!
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 04/22/2010
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Techradar
EN→FR Archive.org versionA powerful laptop with decent 3D capabilities, but it comes at a price. Although the technology world's obsession with 3D has waxed and waned over the past few decades, it's now firmly back in fashion. The price tag also seems a little high. If you are keen to try 3D and aren't necessarily bothered about gaming, the Acer Aspire 5738DZG-434G50Mn might be a better, and cheaper, option.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 03/14/2010
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: T3
EN→FR Archive.org versionWhen will 3D make up its mind? One year we’re gracing our faces with blue and red cardboard glasses re-announcing the revolution, the next it seems to have died a death. Ultimately the ASUS G51J succeeds in bringing 3D to the gaming masses, but in our humble opinion the content – as is often the case – has yet to catch up with the technology. Until it does the £1699 price tag seems a little steep, considering there is currently more power available for much less.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 03/04/2010
Notes: prix: 50% performances: 70%
Source: AnandTech
EN→FR Archive.org versionWe've already discussed our thoughts on the UL80Vt and G51J - you can read the details on pages two and three. Both are great laptops, and while we didn't give either the coveted Gold award they are closer than we've come in quite some time. For those that are wondering, anything earning a Bronze Editors' Choice is (at least in my mind) a 90% score; Silver means 93%, and Gold means 95% or higher. Basically, Gold awards are reserved for unequivocal recommendations, and we do have a few minor complaints with both of these laptops, mostly oriented around the LCDs.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/15/2009
Notes: Note globale: 94%
Source: Notebookreview.com
EN→FR Archive.org versionThe ASUS G51J has a few solid improvements over the older G51VX, most notably the shift from the Intel Q9000 to the Intel Core i7-720QM processor. This change shaved roughly 5 seconds off its wPrime score alone. 3DMark06 performance went up as well, but we didn't see that much of a boost in actual gameplay. PCMark05 is also down, but it is hard to say if it was related to hardware or operating system differences. Overall users who are interested in purchasing this notebook should look at one item; the price. With specifications improving or staying equal, ASUS dropped the price $200, from $1,699 to $1,499. The only items lost were the previously included Eee Stick controllers, which were probably not used many users, if any.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/19/2009
Notes: prix: 80% performances: 70%
Source: Notebookjournal
DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/28/2010
Notes: Note globale: 90% prix: 70% performances: 80% équipement: 80% écran: 50% mobilité: 30% finition: 80% ergonomie: 50%
Source: CHW
ES→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/21/2010
Notes: performances: 95% mobilité: 40% finition: 90%
Source: Jambitz
ES→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/08/2009
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Tinh Te
VN→FR Archive.org versionCritique d'utilisateur, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/09/2010
Notes: Note globale: 75%
Commentaire
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M:
La Nvidia GeForce GTX 260M est essentiellement une GeForce 9800M GTX plus rapide en 55nm et basée sur le noyau G92b (et donc pas comparable à la GTX 260 de bureau). Par rapport à la 9800M GTX, la GTX 260M est fabriqué en 55nm et donc un une plus grande fréquence d’horloge.
Ces cartes devraient être capables de faire tourner tout les jeux d'aujourd'hui, mais la plupart d'entre eux uniquement en détails moyens ou faibles et avec des résolution basses. Les plus vieux jeux ou les jeux moins gourmands restent jouables avec de beaux graphismes.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
720QM: Le Core i7-720QM est le Core i7 Quad Core de 2009 le plus lent: entre 1.6 et 2.8 GHz (grâce au mode Turbo). Il a l'avantage sur les logiciels optimisés pour plusieurs processeurs mais un peu moins bon pour les application mono core. Comparé aux autres Core i7 mobile, le 720QM ne possède que 6Mo de cache L3.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.



