Asus VivoBook S200E-C158H
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable

Price comparison
Moyenne de 8 notes (à partir de 10 critiques)
Critiques pour le/la Asus VivoBook S200E-C158H
Source: Tech Advisor

Our only real complaint about the S200E is the annoyingly reflective screen. Performance and battery life are respectable rather than outstanding, but the S200E offers an attractive, lightweight design and build quality that are rarely seen in laptops costing less than £500.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 08/16/2013
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 80% performances: 80% équipement: 80% finition: 80%
Source: Gadgetspeak

It is 30x20x1.5cm, it weights 1416grams. The 1.5cm thickness is maximum as at the front and back it is only 1cm thick. Finally months after its release I receive a small touch notebook designed for Windows 8. While the 11inch screen may be a little small for some the touch features work well as you will naturally sit with the screen well within reach.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 04/24/2013
Notes: Note globale: 90% prix: 100% performances: 80%
Source: Inside HW

The only real drawback of this model actually has little to do with ASUS. Of course, we’re talking about the operating system, which is far from polished. A bunch of bugs, blue screens, ill-optimised apps and illogical solutions have become Windows 8’s undeniable reality. Whether Microsoft will attempt to fix all these or leave the OS to its fate as they did with Vista remains to be seen.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/04/2013
Source: T3

The Asus is small but heavy, premium but with budget shortfalls - overall, it's a compromise for the price tag. We love the keyboard and design once open, but the lacklustre screen does disappoint. The Acer Aspire S3 is just one example which leaves us considering smaller, cheaper netbooks or budget ultrabooks over this Notebook which tries hard to bring Windows 8 skills at a budget price but falls at crucial hurdles - 3 hour battery life is poor and the weight is unappealing given the screen size. Great price is money is tight, though.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 01/28/2013
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Stuff TV

A good value netbook with the power to handle all but the most specialist of work and play tasks With a whole host of weird and wonderful Win 8 devices hitting the shops, this ultra-portable, ultra-useful, ultra-touchy 11.6in Asus leads the pack. Is this finger-friendly netbook worth it?
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 12/01/2012
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: PC Pro

Despite its flaws, though, we really like this laptop. Asus' VivoBook S200 is compact, attractive and cheap, a combination Ultrabooks have so far abjectly failed to deliver. For just £450, this petite model is a compelling demonstration of how the traditional laptop and the touch features of Windows 8 can live in affordable harmony.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/09/2012
Notes: Note globale: 67% prix: 100% performances: 50% équipement: 67% ergonomie: 67%
Source: Techradar

We're writing this review on it now and simply can't find anything wrong with it at all, which is often not the case with laptops of this size and price. So there you have it. The Asus VivoBook S200 is a brilliant little laptop which offers supreme good looks, slick performance and excellent portability, and all for a highly agreeable price.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/09/2012
Notes: Note globale: 100%
Source: Netzwelt

Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/16/2013
Source: Notegear

Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/23/2012
Notes: Note globale: 91%
Source: Notegear

Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/15/2012
Notes: Note globale: 91%
Commentaire
Intel HD Graphics 4000:
Carte graphique intégrée aux processeurs de la génération Ivy Bridge. Possède des fréquences différentes selon les processeurs (du ULV au quad core de bureau) et donc des performances différentes.
La plupart des jeux pas trop demandants actuels peuvent tourner de façon fluide. soyez prêts à endurer un rendu graphique assez moche à cause de la basse résolution et des détails au minimum. Par ailleurs ces cartes sont suffisantes pour un travail de bureau et le visionnage de vidéos (pas évident pour la vidéo HD).
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
3217U:
Processeur Ivy-Bridge ULV du deuxième trimestre 2012. Il possède une cadence de 1.8 GHz (sans Turbo Boost) et un GPU HD 4000 (350 - 1050 MHz). Le TDP est à 17 W.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.