Asus VivoBook X202E-DH31T
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Asus VivoBook X202E-DH31T (VivoBook X202 Gamme)
Processeur
Intel Core i3-3217U 2 x 1.8 GHz, Ivy Bridge
Carte graphique
Écran
11.60 pouces 16:9, 1366 x 768 pixel, brillant: oui
Poids
1.3 kg
Prix
600 euros
Price comparison
Note moyenne:
Moyenne de 6 notes (à partir de 7 critiques)
Moyenne de 6 notes (à partir de 7 critiques)
prix: - %, performances: 70%, équipement: - %, écran: - % mobilité: 60%, finition: - %, ergonomie: - %, degré de nuisance: - %
Critiques pour le/la Asus VivoBook X202E-DH31T
Asus VivoBook x202 touchscreen netbook review
Source: Tech Advisor
EN→FR Archive.org version
The Asus VivoBook x202 is unique, in that it's the perfect notebook for a very specific demographic: the demographic that wants a small, portable, touchscreen laptop for a relatively cheap price. The VivoBook is just £459, which makes it about half the price of an Ultrabook or a MacBook Air. Since there aren't a ton of ultraportable options at this price point, the VivoBook does have a niche to fill. So, if you're looking for a notebook that you can pop into your purse--and you definitely don't want a tablet--the VivoBook might be worth a look.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 02/07/2013
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Tech Advisor
EN→FR Archive.org versionThe Asus VivoBook x202 is unique, in that it's the perfect notebook for a very specific demographic: the demographic that wants a small, portable, touchscreen laptop for a relatively cheap price. The VivoBook is just £459, which makes it about half the price of an Ultrabook or a MacBook Air. Since there aren't a ton of ultraportable options at this price point, the VivoBook does have a niche to fill. So, if you're looking for a notebook that you can pop into your purse--and you definitely don't want a tablet--the VivoBook might be worth a look.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 02/07/2013
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Asus VivoBook X202E-DH31T Review and Ratings
Source: Computer Shopper EN→FR Archive.org version
The VivoBook X202E certainly isn't without shortcomings. Those who frequently task their laptops with CPU-taxing workloads like video editing and bulk crunching of high-resolution still images should look for a system with a more powerful Core i5 or i7 processor. And those who need long battery life should likewise look for something else.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/31/2013
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Computer Shopper
EN→FR Archive.org versionThe VivoBook X202E certainly isn't without shortcomings. Those who frequently task their laptops with CPU-taxing workloads like video editing and bulk crunching of high-resolution still images should look for a system with a more powerful Core i5 or i7 processor. And those who need long battery life should likewise look for something else.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/31/2013
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Asus VivoBook X202E-DH31T review
Source: IT Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
The new range of hybrid tablets and touchable laptops on the market now may offer better performance and battery life, but the Asus VivoBook X202E-DH31T puts touch capability into an affordable price range, which may make it worthwhile despite the flaws. Compared to other 10- to 12-inch touch-capable Windows 8 laptops, it’s cheap and usable, if not as portable and powerful as leading systems, like the Lenovo IdeaPad Yoga 13.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/26/2013
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: IT Reviews
EN→FR Archive.org versionThe new range of hybrid tablets and touchable laptops on the market now may offer better performance and battery life, but the Asus VivoBook X202E-DH31T puts touch capability into an affordable price range, which may make it worthwhile despite the flaws. Compared to other 10- to 12-inch touch-capable Windows 8 laptops, it’s cheap and usable, if not as portable and powerful as leading systems, like the Lenovo IdeaPad Yoga 13.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/26/2013
Notes: Note globale: 60%
An inexpensive touch-screen Windows 8 laptop
Source: CNet EN→FR Archive.org version
I love the idea of touch-screen Windows 8 laptops dipping down close to $500. There are trade-offs to be sure, in processing power, input device quality, and battery life, and spending another $150 to $200 could make a big difference. But as far as $550 Windows 8 laptops go, the X202E is portable and useful, and worth a look for budget shoppers.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/24/2013
Notes: Note globale: 77% performances: 70% mobilité: 60%
Source: CNet
EN→FR Archive.org versionI love the idea of touch-screen Windows 8 laptops dipping down close to $500. There are trade-offs to be sure, in processing power, input device quality, and battery life, and spending another $150 to $200 could make a big difference. But as far as $550 Windows 8 laptops go, the X202E is portable and useful, and worth a look for budget shoppers.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/24/2013
Notes: Note globale: 77% performances: 70% mobilité: 60%
Asus VivoBook X202E-DH31T
Source: PC Mag EN→FR Archive.org version
The new range of hybrid tablets and touchable laptops on the market now may offer better performance and battery life, but the Asus VivoBook X202E-DH31T puts touch capability into an affordable price range, which may make it worthwhile despite the flaws. Compared to other 10- to 12-inch touch-capable Windows 8 laptops, it's cheap and usable, if not as portable and powerful as leading systems, like the Lenovo IdeaPad Yoga 13. But the price is hard to beat, especially when compared with the budget laptop Editors' Choice Acer Aspire V5-571-6891, which is only $50 less, without touch.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 01/24/2013
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: PC Mag
EN→FR Archive.org versionThe new range of hybrid tablets and touchable laptops on the market now may offer better performance and battery life, but the Asus VivoBook X202E-DH31T puts touch capability into an affordable price range, which may make it worthwhile despite the flaws. Compared to other 10- to 12-inch touch-capable Windows 8 laptops, it's cheap and usable, if not as portable and powerful as leading systems, like the Lenovo IdeaPad Yoga 13. But the price is hard to beat, especially when compared with the budget laptop Editors' Choice Acer Aspire V5-571-6891, which is only $50 less, without touch.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 01/24/2013
Notes: Note globale: 70%
ASUS VivoBook X202E-DH31T
Source: Laptop Mag EN→FR Archive.org version
This entry-level ASUS VivoBook X202E-DH31T provides a solid Windows 8 touch experience in a lightweight design for a tempting $549. Unfortunately, you'll need to bring the power cord with you, as this ultraportable is seriously lacking in battery life. While we don't recommend it either, at least the Acer Aspire V5-571, which also costs $549, offers a more powerful Core i5 processor.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/27/2012
Notes: Note globale: 50%
Source: Laptop Mag
EN→FR Archive.org versionThis entry-level ASUS VivoBook X202E-DH31T provides a solid Windows 8 touch experience in a lightweight design for a tempting $549. Unfortunately, you'll need to bring the power cord with you, as this ultraportable is seriously lacking in battery life. While we don't recommend it either, at least the Acer Aspire V5-571, which also costs $549, offers a more powerful Core i5 processor.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/27/2012
Notes: Note globale: 50%
ASUS VivoBook X202E: недорогой и компактный ноутбук с сенсорным экраном
Source: 3DNews.ru
RU→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/08/2013
Source: 3DNews.ru
RU→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 01/08/2013
Commentaire
Intel HD Graphics 4000:
Carte graphique intégrée aux processeurs de la génération Ivy Bridge. Possède des fréquences différentes selon les processeurs (du ULV au quad core de bureau) et donc des performances différentes.
La plupart des jeux pas trop demandants actuels peuvent tourner de façon fluide. soyez prêts à endurer un rendu graphique assez moche à cause de la basse résolution et des détails au minimum. Par ailleurs ces cartes sont suffisantes pour un travail de bureau et le visionnage de vidéos (pas évident pour la vidéo HD).
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
3217U:
Processeur Ivy-Bridge ULV du deuxième trimestre 2012. Il possède une cadence de 1.8 GHz (sans Turbo Boost) et un GPU HD 4000 (350 - 1050 MHz). Le TDP est à 17 W.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.
