Asus VivoBook S400CA-UH51

Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable

Price comparison

Critiques pour le/la Asus VivoBook S400CA-UH51

80% Asus VivoBook S400C review
Source: Techradar EN→FR Archive.org version
We are disappointed by a few aspects of the VivoBook S400C: notably the battery life and touchpad gestures, but the overwhelming sense is that the S400C is a very good laptop. It doesn't break the bank and doesn't provide unnecessary expensive hardware. The spec sheet features a decent level of equipment that runs Windows 8 smoothly and should provide you with the power you need. And it's a beautifully appointed laptop for the money. It looks almost like an Ultrabook as well; your friends just won't believe that it was only £500.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 01/20/2013
Notes: Note globale: 80%

80% Asus VivoBook S400CA
Source: Computer Shopper EN→FR Archive.org version
No matter how you feel about Windows 8, it's hard to deny that the operating system is best experienced with a touch screen. The Asus VivoBook S400CA is not only tap- and gesture-ready, but it's the most affordable touch-screen laptop we've seen to date (mid-January 2013). That's not to say the S400CA is perfect, not with its pedestrian display and poor battery life.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 01/18/2013
Notes: Note globale: 80%

80% Asus VivoBook S400CA-UH51
Source: PC Mag EN→FR Archive.org version
Compared to other laptops, the Asus VivoBook S400CA-UH51 comes in with great bang for the buck due to its high-performance processor, large amount of storage, touch screen, and above all its sub $700 price. The VivoBook far outperforms ultrabooks priced at the $899 or above. While it doesn't have the battery life (or pricing) to unseat our budget laptop Editors' Choice, the Acer Aspire V5-571-6891, the VivoBook S400CA-UH51 certainly has the chops to become our new Editors' Choice for entry-level ultrabooks with touch screen. In the ultrabook category, it's worth noting that the mainstream EC costs almost $200 more, where you would expect more battery life to be part of the equation. At the entry level, the Asus simply gives users what they need for a better Windows 8 experience, at a fair price.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 12/27/2012
Notes: Note globale: 80%

80% Asus VivoBook S400CA-UH51
Source: IT Reviews EN→FR Archive.org version
With its touch screen, and reasonable price, the Asus VivoBook S400CA-UH51 is the ultrabook to cut your Windows 8 teeth on. The Asus VivoBook S400CA-UH51 is one of the least expensive ways to get a fully functional Windows 8 ultrabook. It's a touch-screen ultrabook that gets the pricing and feature set right.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/27/2012
Notes: Note globale: 80%

74% Won't be the life of the party
Source: CNet EN→FR Archive.org version
Windows 8 may have one foot solidly planted in the future, but in the present it needs to be a reliable OS for everyday computers, too. You get a decent 14-inch laptop package in the Asus VivoBook, especially given that it has a touch screen, but it doesn't add up to anything particularly impressive that you can't get elsewhere either with better design or for a lower price.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/12/2012
Notes: Note globale: 74% performances: 80% mobilité: 70%

60% ASUS VivoBook S400CA-UH51
Source: Laptop Mag EN→FR Archive.org version
The $699 ASUS VivoBook S400CA-UH51 represents a pretty solid value for students, mainstream users and those who have been waiting to pull the trigger on their first Windows 8 machine. This is the lightest and thinnest Ultrabook we've seen that has a 14-inch touch screen. However, while five hours of battery life isn't terrible, other Windows 8 touch screen notebooks last longer on a charge. We also wish the keyboard had a firmer feel.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/04/2012
Notes: Note globale: 60%

Đánh giá laptop cảm ứng Asus Vivobook S400CA
Source: XT Mobile VN→FR Archive.org version
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 12/05/2012

Commentaire

Intel HD Graphics 4000:

Carte graphique intégrée aux processeurs de la génération Ivy Bridge. Possède des fréquences différentes selon les processeurs (du ULV au quad core de bureau) et donc des performances différentes.

La plupart des jeux pas trop demandants actuels peuvent tourner de façon fluide. soyez prêts à endurer un rendu graphique assez moche à cause de la basse résolution et des détails au minimum. Par ailleurs ces cartes sont suffisantes pour un travail de bureau et le visionnage de vidéos (pas évident pour la vidéo HD).

>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.

3317U:

Processeur Ivy Bridge Dual Core ULV du second trimestre. Il possède une fréquence de 1.7 - 2.6 GHz et un GPU HD 4000 intégré (350 - 1050 MHz). Le TDP est noté à 17 W.

Ordinateurs portables similaires avec les mêmes spécifications techniques

Ordinateurs portables similaires d'autres fabricants