Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable

Appareil photo secondaire: 5 MPix Aperture f/2.0, ASUS PixelEnhancing Technology
Price comparison
Moyenne de 13 notes (à partir de 17 critiques)
Critiques pour le/la Asus ZenFone Max ZC550KL
Le ZenFone Max ? Batterie, batterie et batterie. Asus lance sur le marché un smartphone dans un seul but : le Zenfone Max doit avoir l'autonomie la plus importante jamais vue. Comment ? Sous la forme d'une batterie d'une capacité de 5000 mAh batterie et par des solutions logicielles d'économie d'énergie. La future référence de notre test d'autonomie ?
Source: Hardware Zone
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionOverall, it's a decent and respectable phone, but it's also in competition with the more modern entry-level smartphone from Xiaomi. At just S$299, the Redmi Note 3 is worthy of your consideration as it boasts a higher resolution display, smoother performance, a fast fingerprint sensor and a more premium design for only a little more than what the ZenFone Max commands. But you won't get a phone that lasts anywhere near the ZenFone Max, which is clearly the ultimate in battery life performance.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/12/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 75% performances: 80% équipement: 75% finition: 75% ergonomie: 80%
Source: The Techy
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionThe Zenfone Max improves over its predecessor with a slightly better SOC and options to choose an extra gig of RAM. It still offers the stellar battery life that it stood for but what Asus fails to understand is that it’s 2016 and consumer expectations are skyrocketing! At the price, it competes with phones that perform much better and offer similar battery life. Let’s hope the next iteration is well thought of.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 08/16/2016
Source: Tech2.in.com
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionAs you may have guessed by now, the only feature that we did like about the new Asus Zenfone Max was its battery. We also understand that no other smartphone offers a 5000mAh battery in this segment. So we think that the big battery is the only reason one should go in for it. If battery life is your priority and all you do is make calls, send WhatsApp messages and shoot emails this could be your smartphone.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 06/29/2016
Notes: Note globale: 65% performances: 65% équipement: 70% écran: 65% mobilité: 90% finition: 65%
Source: Think Digit
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionThe Asus Zenfone Max (2016) is a good upgrade over the original smartphone in terms of performance and maintains the commendable battery life, but except that, it is still dragging all its shortcomings from the first iteration.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 06/02/2016
Notes: Note globale: 67%
Source: GSM Arena
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionThe Asus Zenfone Max doesn't make a promise it can't keep. It's a true endurance champ, thanks to a massive 5,000mAh battery and longevity-driven design and hardware choices. The Snapdragon 410 chipset is one such compromise and perhaps the spot on the Max's spec sheet that's decidedly below par. Yet, it may very well be thanks to it that the Zenfone Max scored a 121-hour endurance rating, with some 20 hours of web browsing, and close to 16 hours of video playback. Qualcomm's lower midranger may not be quick, but it sure is frugal.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/30/2016
Source: NDTV Gadgets
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionThe Asus ZenFone Max (2016) is certainly a decent attempt by the company to capitalise on one of its best-selling recent products and infuse new life into it considering the competitors that have launched since January. The phone delivers improved performance to make it a little more capable, while continuing to offer excellent battery life and a good camera. Although battery life isn't up to the same stellar levels as the original, it's still more than enough to set the phone apart.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/27/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70% prix: 70% performances: 70% écran: 70% mobilité: 100% finition: 70%
Source: Techtree.com
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionIf you're looking for a good sturdy phone to talk on for hours and do some basic work on, you couldn't do much better than one like the Zenfone Max that has such a solid battery. Check out the Gionee Marathon as well though.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 05/26/2016
Notes: Note globale: 85%
Source: Techtree.com
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionNow that it's fairly certain phone companies haven't come up with a miracle battery for cellphones, the next best thing is to figure out putting in as large a battery into a mobile as possible without increasing the overall dimensions and weight too much. That's exactly what several companies have started toying with. First the Chinese Gionee, with its Marathon M5, then Lenovo Vibe P1, and now the Asus Zenfone Max.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 05/06/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Think Digit
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionThe phone is okay for basic usage and has good battery backup. If you are looking for a smartphone for multitasking and playing graphics-intensive games, you are better off looking elsewhere.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 02/09/2016
Notes: Note globale: 67%
Source: Connect - Heft 11/2016

Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 10/01/2016
Source: c't - Heft 14/2016

Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 07/01/2016
Source: Connect - Heft 7/2016

Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 06/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 83%
Source: Inside Handy
 DE→FR Archive.org version
 DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/02/2016
Notes: Note globale: 79%
Source: Android Pit
 DE→FR Archive.org version
 DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Allround-PC.com
 DE→FR Archive.org version
 DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/25/2016
Source: Curved
 DE→FR Archive.org version
 DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/21/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Smartphone Magazin - Heft 4/2016

Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 03/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 88% prix: 82%
Commentaire
Qualcomm Adreno 306:
Ses cartes graphiques ne sont pas faites pour le jeu. Et même si ils tournent, ce sera avec des erreurs d'affichage et un framerate ignoble. Ce cartes graphique sont totalement incompatible avec les joueurs! les applications de bureau et d'Internet, ne sont pas un problème pour ces cartes graphiques.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
410 MSM8916:
Quad-Core 64-Bit Cortex-A53 avec carte graphique Adreno 306 gravé en 28nm
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.
