LG X Screen
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable

Appareil photo secondaire: 8 MPix
Price comparison
Moyenne de 23 notes (à partir de 39 critiques)
Critiques pour le/la LG X Screen
Deux pour une meilleure vue ? Le LG X Screen est équipé de deux écrans pour un petit tarif. Mais quid de cette fonctionnalité au quotidien ?
Source: What Mobile
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionThe LG X Screen is a good handset that comes at a bad time. With an outdated processor and stiff competition, the allure of a second display isn’t really enough to warrant purchase alone. The Lenovo Moto G4 can be had for practically the same price and trumps it in all areas, including screen, camera and processor capabilities. Had LG shipped this with a faster chipset, we’d be inclined to give it a higher score. As it is, there’s better value for money elsewhere.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 10/14/2016
Notes: Note globale: 66% prix: 60% performances: 60% écran: 65% finition: 65%
Source: The Indian Express
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionLG X screen has a stylish form factor, decent camera and is good with multitasking. But I feel LG is asking for a bit too much of a price here for a phone that lacks full HD display and fingerprint scanner. The mid-budget segment is full of options like Moto G4 Plus, LeEco Le 1s and Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 which offer great specifications, including better camera.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 09/12/2016
Source: Expert Reviews
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionThere's a lot to like about the LG X Screen, not least its handy extra screen and decent battery life. However, when the Moto G4 has a better camera, faster performance and a superior main display, the LG X Screen becomes a tough smartphone to recommend, unless you really fancy the idea of having an additional shortcut bar at the top of your screen. The LG X Screen might fill a small niche, then, but in terms of pure value for money, the Moto G4 still wins by a country mile.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 09/06/2016
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Think Digit
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionThe LG X Screen tries to be different from the pack, and even though it is, the lack of processing power, a sub-par camera and weakened battery life makes it inferior to fellow mid-range smartphones like the LeEco Le 2, Xiaomi Redmi Note 3, Moto G4 Plus and Honor 5C.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/23/2016
Notes: Note globale: 61%
Source: NDTV Gadgets
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionAfter spending a good amount of time with the X screen, we wish more manufactures implemented this concept. Having a second screen constantly displaying basic, relevant information is a real boon and the ability to quickly jump between apps and features is a real time-saver. It just would have been a lot better with a OLED panel rather than a LCD one.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/19/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70% prix: 60% performances: 70% écran: 70% mobilité: 90% finition: 80%
Source: NDTV Gadgets
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionWe believe that the biggest challenge for LG's new X screen will be to take on the popular phones in the segment such as the Moto G4 Plus and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 which obviously offer better specifications. We will have to wait to see how well LG's new X screen performs in the Indian market.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 07/21/2016
Source: Techradar
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionIf you're looking for an affordable Android phone with a solid design, strong performance, sterling battery life, and a competent camera, the LG X Screen is a reasonable choice. However, the headline-grabbing second screen is a bit of a gimmick, and its 8MP selfie camera isn't as sharp as you might be hoping.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/22/2016
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Recombu
 EN→FR Archive.org version
 EN→FR Archive.org versionIf it wasn't for the LG X Screen's second display, it would be a pretty bog-standard mid-range mobile. Performance is fine and battery life is about average, while the main 4.93-inch screen is a bit washed out and inferior to rivals like the Galaxy J5. Still, that secondary display is a cool feature that's genuinely useful; but you'll really need to want it to choose the X Screen over other handsets.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 05/13/2016
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Area DVD
 DE→FR Archive.org version
 DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/20/2017
Source: Chip.de
 DE→FR Archive.org version
 DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/07/2016
Notes: Note globale: 69% performances: 80% équipement: 46% écran: 85% mobilité: 60%
Source: Connect - 01/2017

Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 12/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 83%
Source: Stiftung Warentest - Heft 11/2016

Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 10/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 79% mobilité: 69%
Source: Smartphone Magazin - Heft 05/2016

Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 09/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 87%
Source: WinFuture
 DE→FR Archive.org version
 DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/12/2016
Source: Tech Stage
 DE→FR Archive.org version
 DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/15/2016
Source: WinFuture
 DE→FR Archive.org version
 DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/11/2016
Source: PocketPC
 DE→FR Archive.org version
 DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/06/2016
Source: PocketPC
 DE→FR Archive.org version
 DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/06/2016
Source: Connect - Heft 8/2016

Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 07/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 83%
Source: Android Mag
 DE→FR Archive.org version
 DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 06/29/2016
Source: Ubergismo Deutsch
 DE→FR Archive.org version
 DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 06/24/2016
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Android User
 DE→FR Archive.org version
 DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/23/2016
Notes: Note globale: 78% prix: 100% écran: 100% mobilité: 70%
Source: MobiFlip
 DE→FR Archive.org version
 DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/15/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: PC Welt
 DE→FR Archive.org version
 DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/07/2016
Notes: Note globale: 86% performances: 80% équipement: 93% écran: 85% mobilité: 90%
Source: SFT - Heft 7/2016

Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 06/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 88%
Source: Android Pit
 DE→FR Archive.org version
 DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: A1 Blog
 DE→FR Archive.org version
 DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/01/2016
Source: Notebooksbilliger Blog
 DE→FR Archive.org version
 DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/27/2016
Source: Turn On
 DE→FR Archive.org version
 DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/24/2016
Source: Inside Handy
 DE→FR Archive.org version
 DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/23/2016
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Android Magazin - Heft 3/2016

Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 05/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Android Welt - Heft 5/2016

Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 04/01/2016
Source: Smartphone Magazin - Heft 5/2016

Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 04/01/2016
Notes: Note globale: 87%
Source: eTest
 DE→FR Archive.org version
 DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/22/2016
Source: Nieuwe Mobiel.nl
 NL→FR Archive.org version
 NL→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 08/30/2016
Source: Log.com.tr
 TR→FR Archive.org version
 TR→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 08/09/2016
Source: Tek.no
 NO→FR Archive.org version
 NO→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/23/2016
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Techbox
 SK→FR Archive.org version
 SK→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 08/15/2016
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Commentaire
Qualcomm Adreno 306:
Ses cartes graphiques ne sont pas faites pour le jeu. Et même si ils tournent, ce sera avec des erreurs d'affichage et un framerate ignoble. Ce cartes graphique sont totalement incompatible avec les joueurs! les applications de bureau et d'Internet, ne sont pas un problème pour ces cartes graphiques.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
410 MSM8916:
Quad-Core 64-Bit Cortex-A53 avec carte graphique Adreno 306 gravé en 28nm
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.