Notebookcheck Logo

Vivo X80 Lite

Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable

Vivo X80 Lite
Vivo X80 Lite (X Gamme)
Processeur
MediaTek Dimensity 900 8 x 2 - 2.4 GHz, Cortex-A78 / A55
Carte graphique
Mémoire
8 Go 
Écran
6.44 pouces 20:9, 2404 x 1080 pixel 409 PPP, Capacitive, AMOLED, brillant: oui, HDR, 90 Hz
Disque dur
256GB
Connexions
Lecteur de cartes mémoires: microSD, 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, NFC, Capteurs: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Réseau
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.2, GSM, UMTS, LTE, 5G, Dual SIM, GPS
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 7.8 x 159.2 x 74.2
Batterie
4500 mAh Lithium-Polymère
Système d'exploitation
Android 12
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 64 MPix Triple: 64MP () + 8MP (f/2.2, 16mm, 1/4", 1.12µm) + 2MP (f/2.4)
Appareil photo secondaire: 50 MPix f/2.0
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Clavier: OnScreen
Poids
186 g

 

Pricecompare

Note moyenne: 82.5% - Bon
Moyenne de 2 notes (à partir de 9 critiques)
prix: - %, performances: 64%, équipement: 85%, écran: - % mobilité: 90%, finition: 90%, ergonomie: - %, degré de nuisance: - %

Critiques pour le/la Vivo X80 Lite

Vivo X80 Lite Smartphone Review
Source: OI Spice Tech News Anglais EN→FR
After going through different aspects of the Vivo X80 Lite smartphone, we concluded that this phone is a good option in the mid-range segment. At the same time, you’re getting almost everything that you can expect from a decent mid-tier phone, but at the same time, there’s nothing special about this phone. You will find the same features and perks in other brands with few alterations in the specs. But still, the overall experience would be similar. You can purchase this phone without any doubt, but first, we recommend you compare it to the alternative options. For that, we suggest you look at the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G, as it provides better software updates and a more stable camera experience. Finally, pick the best smartphone according to your requirements.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/03/2022
Vivo X80 Lite 5G Display test
Source: DxOMark Anglais EN→FR
The Vivo X80 Lite 5G has good color fidelity, along with good uniformity for both brightness and color. Its biggest drawback is its readability in low-light conditions, where it exhibits instability — that is, even at the same ambient light level, the display produces different levels of brightness. Further, the device’s high brightness mode lends an unnatural aspect to skin tones in outdoor conditions. Although frame drops are rare when playing videos games, the X80 Lite 5G does not provide a comfortable user experience because it is not very smooth and shows visible aliasing.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/17/2022
Vivo X80 Lite 5G Camera test
Source: DxOMark Anglais EN→FR
In our tests, the Vivo X80 Lite 5G’s photo mode did well in bright light and indoor scenes with limited contrast and little motion in the scene. In these conditions, the camera delivered accurate exposure and a fast autofocus performance. Fine detail was also rendered nicely, thanks to a wide depth of field even on all subjects in group portraits. Noise levels were generally low, but some noise could be noticed in blue skies. In low-contrast scenes, the camera also captured well-stabilized video clips, even with the videographer on the move, but for video, the level of recorded detail was generally low. Things started to fall apart slightly in more difficult conditions, with stronger contrast and/or at lower light levels. In high-contrast scenes, exposure and dynamic range would vary strongly across consecutive shots. As a result, several shots could be required to get a good image. In low light, the video autofocus could act erratically, and noise became quite noticeable. Overall, the Vivo X80 Lite 5G is best suited to portrait and landscape photography in not-too-difficult conditions. In scenes with motion or high contrast levels, strong instabilities make it a lot more difficult to capture a good image.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/17/2022
Vivo X80 Lite 5G Battery test
Source: DxOMark Anglais EN→FR
The Vivo X80 Lite 5G attained an excellent global score thanks to its autonomy in moderate use and in calibrated mode, especially when gaming, streaming music and videos. But when tested on the go, the device struggled to maintain power and had a very low autonomy. The charging performance was decent with the 44W charger. It took slightly more than an hour to fully charge the device. The autonomy recovered after a 5-minute charge was 5 hours and 31 minutes, higher than the average. The Vivo X80 Lite 5G also received an excellent efficiency score. Indeed, the discharge currents were very low overall (except when tested on the go), meaning that the device was well-optimized. The charge efficiency, as well as the adapter efficiency, was excellent, but residual consumption was above average. Compared with devices from the same price range ($400 to $599), the Vivo X80 Lite 5G gets an excellent ranking thanks to a very good autonomy score and one of the best efficiency scores. However, the charging score is below average for this segment.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/17/2022
Google Pixel 7 Camera test
Source: DxOMark Anglais EN→FR
For a device in our High-end segment, the impressive camera performance of the Google Pixel 7 rivaled that of the Ultra-Premium Google Pixel 7 Pro. With both two models having the same primary camera and a nearly the same ultra-wide camera, the major difference in the setup is that the Pixel 7 is not equipped with a tele module like the Pixel 7 Pro. But as our results showed, that didn’t deter from the Pixel 7’s excellent camera experience. In still images, the Pixel 7 delivered nice skin tones and natural white balance in most test conditions. Target exposure was accurate, with a wide dynamic range and nice contrast, making the Google device a great option for portrait photography. The autofocus was fast and accurate, test images showed high levels of detail, and artifacts were well under control, with only some aliasing noticeable. On the downside, some noise was noticeable in the shadow areas of the frame. Zoom performance was where the Pixel 7 lagged behind the Pixel 7 Pro, due to the lack of a dedicated tele lens and a narrower field of view on the ultra-wide camera. In video clips, the Pixel 7 delivered good exposure and a wide dynamic range. The autofocus reacted swiftly and kept moving subjects in focus. Detail was good, especially in bright light, and the stabilization did a good job of keeping things steady. However, temporal noise was visible, especially in HDR and low-light scenes. DXOMARK tests video at the settings that provide the overall best quality. In the case of the Pixel 7, this was 4K resolution at 30 frames per second, with the HDR10+ option disabled.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/16/2022
Vivo X80 Lite Specifications, Pros, and Cons
Source: OI Spice Tech News Anglais EN→FR
The Vivo X80 Lite was released in September 2022 and the phone attained a rough price figure of $433 (Rs 35,390 in India) approx. In terms of specifications, the Vivo X80 Lite smartphone comes with a 6.44-inches AMOLED display with HDR10+ support, 1300 nits peak brightness, and 90Hz refresh rate support. The smartphone is powered by a 6nm MediaTek MT6877 Dimensity 900 chipset and Mali-G68 MC4 GPU. In terms of the storage department, you will receive a single 8GB RAM and 256GB of internal storage. Besides this, the device runs on the latest Android 12 OS with FunTouch 12 user interface. For photography and videography, there are triple rear cameras with a 64MP primary camera with OIS support, 8MP ultrawide, and a 2MP macro lens. Besides this, you get an immersive 50MP selfie lens on this smartphone. Thankfully, both cameras can record 4K videos at 30fps. Sensors on the phone include an accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass sensor, color-changing back panel color, and an Under-display fingerprint sensor. The Li-Po 4500 mAh battery with 44W fast charging is available on the Vivo X80 Lite smartphone. You can pick this smartphone in the Diamond Black and Sunrise Gold color options.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/04/2022
83% Análisis del vivo X80 Lite, un interesante y exclusivo gama media
Source: Computerhoy Espagnol ES→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/04/2022
Notes: Note globale: 83%
Vivo X80 Lite, análisis: destaca por sus selfies y conquista por su diseño
Source: El Español Espagnol ES→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/28/2022
82% Recenze Vivo X80 Lite: chameleon, který nevychytal všechny mouchy
Source: Smartmania.cz CZ→FR
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/13/2022
Notes: Note globale: 82% performances: 64% équipement: 85% mobilité: 90% finition: 90%

Commentaire

ARM Mali-G68 MP4:

Carte graphique intégrée de milieu de gamme avec 4 clusters basés sur l'architecture Valhall. 

La plupart des jeux pas trop demandants actuels peuvent tourner de façon fluide. soyez prêts à endurer un rendu graphique assez moche à cause de la basse résolution et des détails au minimum. Par ailleurs ces cartes sont suffisantes pour un travail de bureau et le visionnage de vidéos (pas évident pour la vidéo HD).


>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.


Dimensity 900:

Le Dimensity 900 est un SoC rapide de milieu de gamme avec un modem 5G intégré. Il comprend deux cœurs ARM Cortex-A78 rapides jusqu'à 2,4 GHz et six cœurs Cortex-A55 économes en énergie jusqu'à 2 GHz.


>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.


6.44": Seuls quelques smartphones possèdent une telle diagonale d’écran. 

Un écran de plus grandes dimensions permettent des résolutions plus élevées, les détails comme la finesse des lettres seront meilleurs. Néanmoins, un écran de plus petite taille est synonyme de consommation énergétique moindre et souvent d’un terminal plus compact, plus léger et plus abordable.
>> Pour en savoir un peu plus sur la finesse des pixels à l'écran, jetez un coup d'œil à notre liste des DPI (PPP, points par pouce).


82.5%: Cette note est moyenne, Car la quantité de portables avec de meilleures notes est à peu près égale avec le nombre de portables avec de moins bonnes notes.


>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre guide d'achat pour les ordinateurs portables.

 

Please share our article, every link counts!

Ordinateurs portables similaires d'autres fabricants et/ou avec un processeur différent

Samsung Galaxy A25 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos Exynos 1280
Ulefone Power Armor 18 Ultra
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050
Ulefone Power Armor 18T Ultra
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050
Doogee V30 Pro
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050
Oppo A2 Pro
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050
Doogee V31 GT
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080
Samsung Galaxy F34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos Exynos 1280
Samsung Galaxy M34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos Exynos 1280
Realme Narzo 60 Pro
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050
Oppo Reno10
Mali-G68 MP4, unknown
Realme 11 Pro
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050
Doogee V30T
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080
Realme 11 Pro+
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 7050
Doogee V Max
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080
Vivo Y100
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900
Vivo iQOO Z7
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920
Samsung Galaxy A34 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080
Doogee V30
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900
Honor 80 SE
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900
Ulefone Power Armor 18T
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900
Infinix Zero 5G 2023
Mali-G68 MP4, unknown
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080
Infinix Zero Ultra
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920
realme 10 Pro+
Mali-G68 MP4, unknown
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro+
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 1080
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900

Ordinateurs portables avec les mêmes diagonale d'écran et/ou poids

Vivo S17
Adreno 642L, Snapdragon SD 778G+ 5G, 6.78", 0.186 kg
Vivo X100
unknown, unknown, 6.78", 0.206 kg
Comparaison des prix
Stefan Hinum (Update: 2023-01-21)