Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable

Appareil photo secondaire: 5 MPix f/2.4
Price comparison
Moyenne de 23 notes (à partir de 35 critiques)
Critiques pour le/la Lenovo Moto E4 Plus
Simple addition. More battery, more RAM, more display - Motorola really means the "Plus" in its Moto E4 Plus. Find out whether these positive aspects outweigh the rather low system performance in our review.
Source: Top for Phone
Archive.org versionAvec ce Moto E4 Plus, le pari de Motorola était de proposer un smartphone à prix serré offrant un grande autonomie. Avec plus de 2 jours, voire 2 jours et demi, on peut affirmer que le pari est réussi.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/16/2018
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: T3
EN→FR Archive.org versionIt’s an E4 with a bigger battery and a comparatively low-res screen. This budget bargain runs for two days.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 04/06/2018
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: T3
EN→FR Archive.org versionIt’s an E4 with a bigger battery and a comparatively low-res screen. This budget bargain runs for two days.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 03/13/2018
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Talk Android
EN→FR Archive.org versionAll that said, the phones work amazingly well. Effectively the hardware in the devices is similar to what flagship phones had about 3 to 4 years ago. Using the phones invoked in me a bit of a sense of time travel as if I had gone back in time and grabbed a smartphone off the shelf. However, buyers today get the benefit of improvements to the Android operating system as well as app developers continuing to streamline and optimize their apps. So although the hardware may feel like a bit of a step back in time, actual operation of the phones leans toward a much smoother, snappier experience.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/14/2017
Source: Techaeris
EN→FR Archive.org versionIf you’re looking for a decent performing budget phone with massive battery life then the Moto e4 Plus is an excellent choice. If camera performance is more important then look elsewhere. If you’re just looking for a basic, decent performing smartphone in general, then this is a good choice. Keep in mind there are lockscreen ads and added Amazon apps you cannot delete.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/24/2017
Notes: Note globale: 88% prix: 90% performances: 85% écran: 85% mobilité: 100% finition: 85%
Source: Tom's Guide
EN→FR Archive.org versionIf you need a phone that rarely sleeps, the Moto E4 Plus’s incredible battery life is hard to pass up, especially for less than $200. The device’s display, camera and performance aren’t the best you can get, not even in a budget phone, but they’re good enough if a lower price tag is more important to you than cutting edge-features.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/03/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Manila Shaker
EN→FR Archive.org versionFor a budget phone, the Moto E4 Plus looks and feels pretty good at emulating a premium phone. Sure, it doesn’t have spectacular features and remains a basic phone at best, but if you’re looking for a phone that will help you last for more than a day, the Moto E4 Plus has enough battery life to help you do so.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/24/2017
Source: Zdnet.com
EN→FR Archive.org versionOverall, the Moto Z2 Force Edition is a solid Android smartphone at a price less than the flagships. There are other compelling smartphones at the same or lower price so you really have to like using one or two Moto Mods to justify the Z2 Force Edition.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/14/2017
Notes: Note globale: 55%
Source: Slashgear
EN→FR Archive.org versionNow that the Moto E4 Plus is ready to roll in the United States, we’ve got an interesting price/value proposition on our hands. Straight from Motorola online this device is available for $179, no strings attached. As such, this device is quite easily one of the best long battery life basic-function smartphones on the market for this price.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/08/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: PC Mag
EN→FR Archive.org versionThe Moto E4 Plus is our low-end battery champ, beating beefy competitors like the LG X Power on endurance. But the added cost of the big battery puts the E4 Plus in a slightly awkward place. At $180 unlocked (or even at $130 on a carrier), it comes very close to the $185 Amazon Prime subsidized entry-level price for the Moto G5 Plus, which has a noticeably better screen and faster processor.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/03/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: The Mobile Indian
EN→FR Archive.org versionTo wrap up, the Moto E4 Plus comes with a metal build, boast some decent cameras and the 5000mAh battery surely looks tempting. On the downside, the phone is powered by an old processor which might affect its overall performance. As for the competition is concerned, the smartphone will compete against, Xiaomi Redmi 4, Lenovo K6 Power, Coolpad Note 5, and Xiaomi Redmi 4.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/17/2017
Source: NDTV Gadgets
EN→FR Archive.org versionAt these prices, the Moto E4 will be competing against the Xiaomi Redmi 4 and Yu Yureka Black, while the Moto E4 Plus will be going up against other smartphones with large battery capacities, including the InFocus Turbo 5, Lenovo K6 Power, and Asus ZenFone 3 Max.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/13/2017
Source: Phone Arena
EN→FR Archive.org versionIt's a tough job to criticize a $180 handset. The Moto E4 Plus' display is certainly not perfect, its camera leaves a lot to be desired, its performance is only good for basic smartphone tasks. But one can justifiably argue that for this price, the Moto E4 does a good job as a basic smartphone.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 06/30/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Tech Stage
DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/21/2017
Source: Chip.de
DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/23/2017
Notes: Note globale: 77%
Source: Android Pit
DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/24/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: El Androide Libre
ES→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 12/25/2017
Notes: Note globale: 65%
Source: Tuexperto
ES→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/28/2017
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget
ES→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 06/25/2017
Source: Tecno User
IT→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 12/12/2017
Notes: Note globale: 79% prix: 85% performances: 80% écran: 70% mobilité: 100% finition: 60%
Source: Tutto Android
IT→FR Archive.org versionComparaison, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 11/28/2017
Notes: Note globale: 73% prix: 80% équipement: 68% écran: 73% mobilité: 93% ergonomie: 68%
Source: Smartphone Italia
IT→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 10/06/2017
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 80% équipement: 70% écran: 70% mobilité: 90% finition: 80% ergonomie: 80%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android
IT→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/14/2017
Notes: performances: 70% écran: 70% mobilité: 70% finition: 70%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi
IT→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 08/02/2017
Notes: Note globale: 76% prix: 85% écran: 75% mobilité: 90% finition: 65%
Source: AndroidWorld.it
IT→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/01/2017
Notes: Note globale: 79% prix: 70% équipement: 75% écran: 75% mobilité: 85% ergonomie: 70%
Source: Diskidee.nl
NL→FR Archive.org versionComparaison, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 10/06/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: GadgetGear.nl
NL→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/04/2017
Notes: Note globale: 100%
Source: All About Phones
NL→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/14/2017
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Antyweb
PL→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 06/22/2018
Source: Mega Obzor
RU→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/18/2017
Source: The Gioididong
VN→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 09/06/2017
Notes: Note globale: 72%
Source: Smartphone.bg
BU→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/04/2017
Source: Smartphone.bg
BU→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 07/19/2017
Source: Mobil.se
SV→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 07/10/2017
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Android Portal
SK→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/09/2017
Notes: Note globale: 65% finition: 60%
Commentaire
ARM Mali-T720 MP2:
Carte graphique pour SoCs ARM. Peut être modulée en 1 - 8 cœurs (T720 MP8) cadencés à 650 MHz (gravure en 28nm). Support des librairies OpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.1, DirectX 11 FL9_3 et Renderscript.
Ses cartes graphiques ne sont pas faites pour le jeu. Et même si ils tournent, ce sera avec des erreurs d'affichage et un framerate ignoble. Ce cartes graphique sont totalement incompatible avec les joueurs! les applications de bureau et d'Internet, ne sont pas un problème pour ces cartes graphiques.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
MT6737:
SoC ARM quad-core 64 bit intégrant quatre cœurs processeurs Cortex-A53 cadencés jusqu'à 1.3 GHz.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.