Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable

Appareil photo secondaire: 12 MPix (f/2.2, FF, Videos @1080p/30fps)
Price comparison
Moyenne de 36 notes (à partir de 73 critiques)
Critiques pour le/la Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
Si vous recherchez un téléphone de milieu de gamme abordable en 2025, il est difficile d'éviter le Galaxy A36. Du moins en ce qui concerne la prise en charge des mises à jour à long terme. Mais la double eSIM et l'étui résistant à l'eau sont également des arguments de vente uniques dans cette gamme de prix. Samsung a-t-il construit le meilleur smartphone à moins de 400 euros ?
Source: L' Eclaireur FNAC

Le Samsung Galaxy A36 est un excellent smartphone de milieu de gamme qui, face à une concurrence féroce, brille essentiellement par sa partie logicielle aboutie et qui bénéficie de surcroît d’une ambitieuse politique de mise à jour. Pour le reste, cette nouvelle génération manque un peu de piquant et peine à véritablement se démarquer de la concurrence… et de l’A35 de l’année dernière. Sa nouvelle mécanique n’est que très légèrement plus performante. Les trois caméras sont identiques et l’écran se montre un peu plus lumineux.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 04/26/2025
Source: Clubic

Le Galaxy A36 succède fort logiquement au Galaxy A35 sorti l’an dernier. Samsung ne s’est pas trop foulé pour le concevoir, puisqu’il est quasiment identique à son prédécesseur en matière de design et d’ergonomie. Étonnamment, il hérite cette année d’un SoC Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 de Qualcomm plutôt que de conserver une puce Samsung Exynos. Ses performances sont tout à fait correctes pour un usage basique, mais nettement moins pour les apps nécessitant une grande puissance de calcul. Ce n’est guère étonnant, vu le positionnement entrée-milieu de gamme de l’appareil. Cela ne l’empêche pas de disposer d’un magnifique écran OLED d’une certification IP67 et d’un emplacement pour carte mémoire microSD. Sa batterie de 5 000 mAh permet de tenir une grosse journée avant de se retrouver à sec et l’on apprécie que la charge rapide 45 watts soit enfin supportée.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/18/2025
Notes: Note globale: 80% performances: 80% écran: 90% mobilité: 70% finition: 80%
Source: Frandroid

Les amélioration du Galaxy A36 par rapport au Galaxy A35 sont assez nombreuses, mais elles sont délivrées par toutes petites touches. Elles concernent le design (bloc optique redessiné), l'écran (0,1 pouces plus grand), la pérennité logicielle (6 années de mises à jour au lieu de 5), la recharge filaire accélérée (mais toujours un peu lente néanmoins) et les fonctions IA (minimalistes). Le changement de processeur n'apporte quant à lui pas grand chose du point de vue des performances (qui demeurent satisfaisantes). Les objectifs photo demeurent les mêmes, avec des résultats moyennement convaincants. En définitive, tout cela forme un smartphone séduisant, mais qui manque quelque peu d'ambition. On a un peu trop l'impression que Samsung se repose sur ses lauriers.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/08/2025
Notes: Note globale: 70% performances: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 70% finition: 70%
Source: Les Numeriques

Avec le Galaxy A36 5G, Samsung parvient encore à proposer un smartphone équilibré, dont l’expérience n’a rien à envier à celle de son cousin Galaxy A56. Affichage réussi, autonomie améliorée par rapport à son prédécesseur, volet photo convaincant, outils d’IA bienvenus… : il se montre fiable et fluide au quotidien, malgré quelques absents (microSD, recharge sans-fil). Sans révolutionner la gamme, l’A36 incarne ce qu’on attend d’un terminal abordable en 2025, à savoir un appareil complet, efficace et taillé pour durer.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/05/2025
Notes: Note globale: 80% performances: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 60% finition: 80% ergonomie: 80%
Critiques dans des langues étrangères
Source: Tech Advisor

The Samsung Galaxy A36 5G is another solid, affordable mid-ranger that won’t let you down. However, it also won’t excite you in any way. There’s a new breed of mid-range phones that dare to try something different, whether it’s the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro’s telephoto camera and memory-aid button, or the Motorola Edge 60’s unusually robust design and super-bright screen.When taken in this context, the Samsung Galaxy A36 can’t help but feel a little safe and drab. What it does supply is a decent screen, a good camera, solid stamina, and exemplary software support. Whether that’s enough to set your pulse racing is another matter. You have to feel that Samsung should be doing more in performance and design terms.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 06/05/2025
Notes: Note globale: 78%
Source: Mobile Syrup

The Galaxy A36 shows how Samsung has a full-service portfolio in Canada. The handset isn’t for me, I’m a flagship guy, but if you’re not interested in the bells and whistles, this might be for you. My little brother uses his phone to listen to music, make calls and text his friends. This is all he would need. Similarly, my dad doesn’t use his phone often, and I would have no problem recommending this to him either.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 05/29/2025
Source: Gadgetbyte Nepal

So, wrapping up this review, I’d say the Samsung Galaxy A36 is a decent phone with some nice features. But at this price point, it doesn’t really blow me away. If you’re dead set on buying a Samsung phone and don’t want to cross the 50K mark, then sure, go for the A36. But if you’re fine with a non-Samsung phone, then there are better phones in this price range. Like the Nothing Phone (3a) (review), Honor 200 (review), or the CMF Phone 2 Pro (review). In short, the A36 is like ordering a fancy meal that tastes okay but leaves you thinking, “Maybe I should’ve just spent a bit more for the steak.”
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/27/2025
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 75% performances: 70% écran: 85% mobilité: 85% finition: 85%
Source: Nextpit EN

The Galaxy A5X has been one of the best-selling smartphones across the world for years, while cheaper models often receive less attention. This year, the A56 once again proved to be a solid choice in the mid-range in our review. Neither performance, battery, nor camera stood out, but there are no serious weaknesses with it either. In combination with Samsung's excellent update policy, the device retains a clear "Buy" recommendation. However, the Samsung Galaxy A36 has caught up and is almost as good as its big brother. For $100 less, Samsung has made cuts in the right places without compromising its suitability for everyday use. The plastic frame is hardly noticeable in everyday use, especially with a protective cover. The ultra wide-angle camera lags behind that of the A56, but even the more expensive model does not offer outstanding quality in this department.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/20/2025
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Calcalistech

The Galaxy A36 invites the classic question: is the glass half empty or half full? At first glance, its lack of AI features might make it seem like a second-tier device in Samsung’s lineup. However, the A36 has some strong points: solid protection, support for eSIM (still rare at this price level), an excellent display, and overall, it performs its intended role well. That said, it faces stiff competition. At the same price point, other devices offer better water and dust resistance, more storage, faster charging, or more RAM. There are also cheaper phones that match the A36’s feature set. It's unclear whether Samsung's brand name alone will be enough to convince consumers to opt for this more affordable model.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/12/2025
Source: PC Mag

The Samsung Galaxy A36 is a solid update to the A35 with a brighter display, smoother performance, and extended update promises. It also takes cleaner photos and adds a dash of AI. It’s a strong choice if you want a reliable Android phone for under $400. If you're willing to increase your budget by $100, the Pixel 9a offers even better camera quality and advanced AI tools, making it our Editors' Choice winner for midrange Android phones.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/07/2025
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Tom's Guide

Is the Galaxy A36 my favorite budget phone? Not really. While I can see how it can suffice for the basic things, I would still recommend ponying up the extra $100 to get the Pixel 9a — for the extra performance boost, value, and richer AI features. That said, the Galaxy A36 is a well-designed phone that checks off most of the boxes. It’s even better in the battery life department over its predecessor, but it falls short in other areas like its low light camera performance, subpar performance, and the fact that its display compares poorly to other AMOLEDs.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/04/2025
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Techlusive

After reviewing for more than 20 days, I could say that Samsung Galaxy A36 5G is a solid mid-raneg smartphone with notable improvements over its predecessor. However, the smartphone is not without its flaws and hence it could be better, especially in gaming section and demanding applications. The camera offers an incremental improvement, with few weak spots in low-light. The positive side is that the display offers a vibrant quality and the battery life is excellent. The design feels premium for the price range it belongs. If you are someone who is looking for a smartphone with reliable performance for everyday tasks, then this could be the best option. It offers good camera quality and solid software support and hence it is worth considering keeping the price range in mind.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 04/23/2025
Source: The Mobile Indian

At Rs 32,999, there are phones that offer better performance than the Galaxy A36 5G. However, like the Galaxy A56 5G, what makes the A36 5G stand out is its overall balanced approach. Instead of just chasing raw power, it delivers a well-rounded experience. It might not be a gaming powerhouse, but it handles everyday tasks smoothly, offers a stable software experience, reliable battery life, decent cameras, and a stunning display — all wrapped in a solid build. That’s where the Galaxy A36 5G really shines.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/21/2025
Notes: Note globale: 83% performances: 75% écran: 90% mobilité: 80% finition: 85%
Source: Android Authority

There are brief moments when the A36 5G runs smoother, but those are the exception. That inconsistency doesn’t inspire much confidence, especially when this is how the phone behaves fresh out of the box. Hopefully, this is just a software optimization issue that Samsung can improve in a future update, but the underperformance in CPU benchmarks doesn’t leave me convinced that Samsung made the right choice to switch to a chip that can handle games better, but isn’t working for basic multitasking. If someone outside the US asked me whether to buy the Galaxy A36 5G, the answer would be a firm no. At this price point, you’ll find several better-performing options from brands like OnePlus, Motorola, Xiaomi, realme, and others — many of which offer stronger cameras and snappier performance for the same or even less money.In the US, however, the story’s a bit more complicated.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 04/18/2025
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: NLT

So, should you buy the Samsung Galaxy A36? I think this is a tough question to answer. At the price of RM1,499, I think this is actually quite expensive – particularly because of the Snapdragon 6 Gen 3. If Samsung opted for the Exynos 1480, I’d say it’s a much better deal. I think the biggest reason to buy the Galaxy A36 is because of One UI 7. Even with the Now Brief missing, One UI 7 is superbly powerful thanks to features such as the Modes and Routines and Samsung Wallet.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/31/2025
Source: Yugatech

The Samsung Galaxy A36 5G retails for PHP 19,990 with 6GB RAM and 128GB of storage. There is also a unit with 8GB of RAM and 256GB of storage worth PHP 21,990. For our general consensus - this phone is still a great find! It stays true to what a mid-ranger should be, checking out all the essential boxes. It also gives you a little bit more at less than PHP 20,000. Potential buyers can expect an amazing multimedia consumption setup, good cameras, and an even better battery life. If users are looking for a bit more from Samsung under PHP 26,000, there's a clear alternative. The Samsung Galaxy A56 offers practically the same experience with a better build and more juice under the hood. Interested readers can feel free to check out our published review on the A56.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/31/2025
Source: Phone Arena

See, it's natural for just about anyone to always lust after the most premium and spec'd-out flagships. It's just human nature to be awed by shiny things. However, the Galaxy A36 5G isn't a bad phone just because it's a value offering. It shapes up to be a decent proposition in the sub-$400 category. Yes, it will start at $399 when it hits the shelves on March 26, and that's a fairly attractive price tag for a Galaxy mid-ranger. Some issues that are immediately obvious when you take the phone is the slightly lackluster performance (it doesn't take long for the phone to lag a little) and it's camera, which only has the bare minimum, but for $400, you can't fault Samsung for cutting that many corners. Should you buy the Galaxy A36 5G? If you're on a tight budget, there are certainly worse ways to spend your money.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/31/2025
Notes: Note globale: 57% performances: 82% écran: 70% mobilité: 70% finition: 60%
Source: Tech Advisor

If you’re looking for the best value-for-money mid-range phone and don’t mind slightly slower charging, then the Galaxy A35 remains a great budget option. However, if you want the latest AI features, faster charging, and a noticeably brighter display, then the Galaxy A36 is worth the extra cost. The A36 feels more future-proof, thanks to its Qualcomm chip, AI tools, and better long-term usability, making it a better investment overall.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/28/2025
Source: The Indian Express

When it comes to mid-range smartphones, brands like Nothing, OnePlus, and iQOO compete for consumer attention with superior build quality, impressive cameras, and a refined UI. With so many options at their disposal, it has become a tough call for consumers to zero in on a smartphone that is functional yet offers a glint of premium experience. South Korean smartphone maker Samsung recently launched its Galaxy A36 5G, making it the latest device to compete in the mid-range segment.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 03/27/2025
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: GSM Arena

The Galaxy A36 is the most balanced Samsung midranger from the new series with an improved design, more powerful graphics, and faster charging over the Galaxy A35. It has been promised 6 major Android updates, which is a lot. The Galaxy A36 delivered excellent screen brightness, and it is indeed slightly faster to charge. We are happy with its speakers' loudness and quality, and its overall performance is adequate. The battery life is adequate too, though not chart-topping for sure. The disappointment came from the lack of improvement in the camera department and the photo and video quality. The model has been sort of stuck since the Galaxy A34.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/26/2025
Notes: Note globale: 76%
Source: India Today

The Samsung Galaxy A56 is priced at Rs 41,999, while the Galaxy A36 comes in at Rs 32,999. While the Galaxy A36 is a good choice, the A56 offers better overall value, particularly due to its camera performance. Both smartphones deliver smooth day-to-day performance with long battery life and feature water resistance. Both the A56 and A36 are sleek, have large and attractive displays, and have a sturdy build, but if you care about smartphone photography, the A56 just makes a little more sense.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/25/2025
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: 91mobiles

The Galaxy A36 starts at Rs 32,999 for the 8GB+128GB variant, with the top-end 12GB+256GB model priced at Rs 38,999. For what it offers, the A36 holds good value – especially if you prioritise a polished software experience (with AI features) and a premium-looking design. Its cameras are reliable, though low-light performance could have been better. And, as expected from a Samsung device, the multimedia experience remains one of its biggest strengths. Its closest competitors are the Vivo V50 (review) and Redmi Note 14 Pro+ (review). The Vivo V50 has an advantage with higher performance and slightly better cameras, though its software experience isn’t as refined. The Redmi Note 14 Pro+ also offers longer battery life, faster charging, and a more durable build, while its camera performance is on par with the A36.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/18/2025
Notes: Note globale: 78% performances: 70% écran: 80% mobilité: 75% finition: 80%
Source: Think Digit

The Samsung Galaxy A36 5G shines with its flawless display, offering flagship-level brightness and color accuracy, making it ideal for media lovers. It features a refined design, reliable battery life, and a decent camera setup, though performance lags in intensive gaming. Samsung birthed the Galaxy A series line of mid-range smartphones over 10 years ago and has shipped more than 89 million phones since. Samsung has thrown its hat in the ring once again with the Galaxy A36, priced at Rs 32,999 in India. On paper, it promises a lot: a stunning Super AMOLED display, a capable Snapdragon processor, and a powerful triple-camera setup. But is the Galaxy A36 5G just another mid-range device, or does it bring enough to the table to justify its price tag? Let’s see whether Samsung’s latest A series phone is a hit or miss.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/11/2025
Notes: Note globale: 65% prix: 66% performances: 57% finition: 74%
Source: Tech Spurt

Which mid-range smartphone you opt for will likely depend on your budget, more than anything else.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/02/2025
Source: Unbox

This means that you’re also getting some of the AI functionality that we’ve been seeing on the new S series as well, like: Circle to Search with Audio, AI Select, and all the photography options we’ve come to know and love. We also got a chance to see their Best Face feature in action as well to make group shots a little easier at family gatherings.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 03/02/2025
Source: NDTV Gadgets

To conclude, the Samsung Galaxy A56 and Samsung Galaxy A36 do bring some interesting features to the table. Whether be it new design language or dependable cameras coupled with six years of OS and security updates, both devices have a lot to offer in this price segment. However, can they survive this tough competition? We will be able to answer this in our upcoming review. So, stay tuned.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 03/02/2025
Source: SuperSaf

Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/02/2025
Source: GSM Arena

We have very little doubt that the Galaxy A36 and A56 will enjoy plenty of mass popularity. As we said, Samsung isn't changing too much and rocking the boat too much, which is understandable. Well, except for the removal of the microSD expansion slots, which is quite a bummer. Samsung Glaxy A36 and Galaxy A56 hands-on review Other than that, we personally enjoy the new design. The new chipsets and better cooling offer a nice performance boost on both phones compared to last year's models, and the thermal management and stability are very impressive. The addition of 45W charging is a nice little bonus. The overall camera quality seems to come with a slight upgrade, though it's a bit early to judge.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/02/2025
Source: The Tech Chap

Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/02/2025
Source: Expert Reviews

These phones aren’t the sexiest devices on God’s green Earth, and there’s nothing really groundbreaking here in terms of new features and design. They are a little improved on the design front, which is nice, but ultimately, they’re not all that much different from last year’s handsets from a hardware point of view. And that’s not a huge problem, of course. We liked these phones last year and we’re likely to like them this year as well. Samsung fans will love them. But we preferred the Nothing Phone (2a) last year and Google’s Pixel 8a delivers longer support and (currently) much lower prices with handsets available from around £330. With new Nothing mid-rangers and the Google Pixel 9A on the horizon, I’d respectfully suggest you hold onto your wallet.
Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 03/01/2025
Source: WinFuture

Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 06/24/2025
Source: PC Welt

Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/16/2025
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Tablet Blog

Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 06/03/2025
Notes: Note globale: 75%
Source: Nextpit Germany

Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/20/2025
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Inside Handy

Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 05/10/2025
Source: PC Welt

Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/29/2025
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Computerbild

Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 04/22/2025
Notes: Note globale: 94%
Source: Computerbild

Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 04/19/2025
Notes: Note globale: 94%
Source: Smartzone

Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/18/2025
Notes: Note globale: 83% performances: 80% écran: 90% mobilité: 80% finition: 85%
Source: Gamestar

Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/11/2025
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Netzwelt

Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 04/04/2025
Notes: Note globale: 84% performances: 70% écran: 78% ergonomie: 91%
Source: Computerhoy

Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/02/2025
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Target HD

Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 04/25/2025
Source: Target HD

Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 04/23/2025
Source: Techprincess IT

Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 04/02/2025
Source: Andrea Galeazzi

Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 04/01/2025
Notes: Note globale: 70% prix: 60% écran: 82% mobilité: 75% finition: 75%
Source: HDblog.it

Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/31/2025
Notes: équipement: 80%
Source: Tutto Android

Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/25/2025
Notes: Note globale: 75%
Source: Evo smart

Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 03/21/2025
Notes: Note globale: 75% écran: 80% mobilité: 80% finition: 70%
Source: Diskidee.nl

Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 05/05/2025
Notes: Note globale: 65%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl

Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 04/25/2025
Notes: Note globale: 75%
Source: PurePC

Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/19/2025
Source: Co Nowego

Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 04/03/2025
Source: Techno Strefa

Comparaison, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/17/2025
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Unite4buy

Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 02/09/2025
Source: Hi-Tech Mail

Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/13/2025
Source: MobilArena HU

Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 04/02/2025
Notes: prix: 70% écran: 80% mobilité: 70% finition: 90%
Source: Zive

Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 04/13/2025
Notes: Note globale: 70%
Source: Viettelstore

Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 04/26/2025
Source: FPT shop

Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 04/18/2025
Source: FPT shop

Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/31/2025
Source: Viettelstore

Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 03/27/2025
Source: FPT shop

Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/25/2025
Source: FPT shop

Travaux pratiques, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/25/2025
Source: Viettelstore

Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 03/21/2025
Source: Viettelstore

Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 03/17/2025
Source: The Gioididong

Travaux pratiques, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 03/12/2025
Source: Jagat Review

Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 03/28/2025
Source: Laptop.bg

Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 04/28/2025
Source: Mobil.se

Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/26/2025
Notes: Note globale: 74% écran: 80%
Source: M3 PC för alla

Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 03/24/2025
Notes: Note globale: 60%
Source: Go4it.ro

Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très longue, Date: 05/09/2025
Source: Computerblog.ro

Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 04/08/2025
Commentaire
Qualcomm Adreno 710:
La plupart des jeux pas trop demandants actuels peuvent tourner de façon fluide. soyez prêts à endurer un rendu graphique assez moche à cause de la basse résolution et des détails au minimum. Par ailleurs ces cartes sont suffisantes pour un travail de bureau et le visionnage de vidéos (pas évident pour la vidéo HD).
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
SD 6 Gen 1: SoC de milieu de gamme avec 8 cœurs Kryo (4x ARM Cortex A78 à 2,4 GHz, 4x ARM Cortex A55 à 1,8 GHz) et un modem 5G (jusqu'à 2900 Mbps en téléchargement). La puce est fabriquée à l'aide du processus moderne 4nm.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.
6.70": Seuls quelques smartphones possèdent une telle diagonale d’écran.
Un écran de plus grandes dimensions permettent des résolutions plus élevées, les détails comme la finesse des lettres seront meilleurs. Néanmoins, un écran de plus petite taille est synonyme de consommation énergétique moindre et souvent d’un terminal plus compact, plus léger et plus abordable.
>> Pour en savoir un peu plus sur la finesse des pixels à l'écran, jetez un coup d'œil à notre liste des DPI (PPP, points par pouce).
Samsung: Le groupe Samsung est le plus grand conglomérat sud-coréen et a été fondé en 1938. Le groupe Samsung employait 489 000 personnes en 2014 et est l'une des plus grandes entreprises au monde en termes de chiffre d'affaires et de force de marché. Le nom Samsung signifie "Trois étoiles" en coréen et représente les trois fils du fondateur de l'entreprise. L'entreprise a été fondée en 1938 en tant qu'épicerie. Avec sa filiale Samsung Electronics, fondée en 1969, Samsung s'est lancé très tôt dans la production d'articles électrotechniques, en se concentrant sur l'électronique grand public et l'électroménager. Les autres branches dans lesquelles la grande entreprise est active comprennent la construction mécanique, l'automobile (Hyundai), l'assurance, le commerce de gros, l'immobilier et les loisirs. Samsung fabrique une large gamme de produits électroniques, notamment des smartphones, des téléviseurs, des appareils électroménagers et des semi-conducteurs. La gamme de smartphones Galaxy de la société est l'une des plus populaires au monde. Samsung est également un acteur majeur de l'industrie des semi-conducteurs, fabriquant des puces de mémoire et des processeurs pour de nombreux autres fabricants d'électronique.
73.86%: La note est mauvaise. La plupart des portables sont mieux notés. Nous ne conseillons pas cet achat.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre guide d'achat pour les ordinateurs portables.