Samsung NF310-A01DE
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable

Price comparison
Moyenne de 11 notes (à partir de 14 critiques)
Critiques pour le/la Samsung NF310-A01DE
Shark-Design. If mini, then at least with style. The swinging forms are conspicuous, the case is grippy in the hand, and the matte HD Ready display gives good oversight of the desktop. Does the Dual-Core shark also impress in terms of battery life?
Source: Digital Versus
EN→FR Archive.org versionSamsung has chosen to play the design card to try and stand out in what is an increasingly crowded netbook market and has launched the NF310 Shark. In the netbook category, the NF310 gives decent battery life. It's a shame that Samsung has settled for such a poor quality screen however. The 1015PEM has the same configuration with a much better panel but lower battery life.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/17/2010
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: CNet
EN→FR Archive.org versionSamsung is a laptop maker that's been on a tear lately. Though the company is largely known for its TVs and smartphones, its U.S. assortment of computers has stood out lately for offering a great mix of design, features, and affordability. The curved, eye-catching Samsung NF310 is a bold 10-inch Netbook with some premium features for its price, but in the end it's not different enough to break out of the mold.
Type de critique inconnu, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/15/2010
Notes: Note globale: 70% performances: 70% mobilité: 70%
Source: Techreview Source
EN→FR Archive.org versionNetbooks have become extremely popular among many groups of people, especially the always "on-the-go" folk. The Samsung NF310-A01 is a 10-inch netbook with a dual-core CPU from Intel and has a high-resolution display and extremely long battery life, which are all things that make a great netbook.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 11/19/2010
Notes: Note globale: 80% écran: 80%
Source: Techreview Source
EN→FR Archive.org versionSystem performance is quite admirable, but the 1GB of RAM holds it back slightly. It is fairly easily upgradable yourself to 2GB if you wish to do it, which is probably worth it. Besides that, average computing tasks work very well and were very quick with this netbook. For a low price of around $400, this is a netbook that's definitely worth a good look.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Très courte, Date: 11/19/2010
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: PC Mag
EN→FR Archive.org versionNetbooks are still key products despite claims that the Apple iPad and the rest of the tablet space are eating into sales. Intel recently launched the first dual-core version of its Atom processor for the mobile space. Standing out from the latest batch of dual-core netbooks is the Samsung NF310-A01 ($399.99 street). It comes with a great user experience, a high-resolution screen, and more than seven hours of battery life. Its price, meanwhile, is close to the Toshiba mini NB305-N410 ($340 list, 4.5 stars)—the netbook it replaces as the new Editors' Choice in this category.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 11/17/2010
Notes: Note globale: 90%
Source: Computer Shopper
EN→FR Archive.org versionStanding out in the netbook crowd has become quite the challenge of late, but Samsung still managed to impress us with the sleek design, high resolution, and dual-core Atom processor of its NF310. This slick netbook sports a sharp design, high resolution, and a dual-core CPU. The price-to-performance ratio is good, and anyone looking for a good netbook deal will feel comfortable with this one.
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/01/2010
Notes: Note globale: 80%
Source: Notebookinfo
DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longueur inconnue, Date: 12/19/2010
Notes: Note globale: 66% performances: 41% équipement: 41% écran: 75% mobilité: 81% ergonomie: 75% degré de nuisance: 70%
Source: Computerbild - 26/2010

Comparaison, , Longue, Date: 12/01/2010
Notes: Note globale: 81% performances: 70% équipement: 82% écran: 84% ergonomie: 82% degré de nuisance: 94%
Source: Mobile News - 1/11

Critique simple, , Longueur inconnue, Date: 12/01/2010
Source: Notebookcheck
DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 11/16/2010
Notes: Note globale: 88% performances: 46% écran: 80% mobilité: 97% finition: 84% ergonomie: 85% degré de nuisance: 94%
Source: Notebookjournal
DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/28/2010
Notes: Note globale: 80% prix: 70% performances: 70% équipement: 30% écran: 50% mobilité: 40% finition: 60% ergonomie: 50%
Source: CHW
ES→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 12/20/2010
Source: PCM
NL→FR Archive.org versionType de critique inconnu, disponibles en ligne, Longueur inconnue, Date: 12/02/2010
Source: Hi-Tech Mail
RU→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 12/01/2010
Commentaire
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150: Carte graphique intégrée pour les Intel Atom N4xx CPUs. A peine plus rapide que les GMA 950 et donc pas non plus pour les jeux ou la HD.
Ses cartes graphiques ne sont pas faites pour le jeu. Et même si ils tournent, ce sera avec des erreurs d'affichage et un framerate ignoble. Ce cartes graphique sont totalement incompatible avec les joueurs! les applications de bureau et d'Internet, ne sont pas un problème pour ces cartes graphiques.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
Intel Atom:
Le processeur Intel Atom est un microprocesseur 64-bits pour ordinateurs portables petits et bon marché, les MIDs ou UMPC. La spécialité de la nouvelle architecture est dans le mode d'exécution "in order" (au lieu de l'habituel et plus rapide mode d'exécution "out of order"). Par conséquent, le coût du transistor de la série Atom est beaucoup plus faible, et donc moins cher à produire.
N550:
Dual core Atom avec un TDP de seulement 8.5 Watt. Avec sa fréquence de 1.5 GHz il est plus lent qu'un N465 Atom.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.




