Notebookcheck

Courte critique du PC portable Gigabyte Aero 14 v8 (i7-8750H, GTX 1050 Ti, QHD)

Plus de puissance. Gigabyte met à jour son portable fin de 14 pouces avec un nouveau processeur six cœurs. Découvrez comment cela joue sur les performances, le bruit des ventilateurs, les températures et la consommation énergétique.
Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser, Felicitas Krohn (traduit par JBP), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
, , , , , ,
relation de la recherche.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Gigabyte Aero 14-K8 (Aero 14 Gamme)
Processeur
Intel Core i7-8750H 6 x 2.2 - 4.1 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Carte graphique
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile - 4096 Mo, Processeur: 1493 MHz, Mémoire: 3500 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 388.92, Optimus
Mémoire
16384 Mo 
, DDR4-2 400, simple canal, 1 emplacement sur 2 occupé, 32 Go maximum
Écran
14.00 pouces 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 210 PPP, AU Optronics B140QAN01.5 (AUO1536), IPS, QHD, 60 Hz, X-Rite Pantone, brillant: non
Carte mère
Intel HM370
Disque dur
Crucial MX300 CT525MX300SSD1, 525 Go 
, SSD SATA III. Deux emplacements M.2-2280.
Carte son
Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH
Connexions
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Encoche de Sécurité Kensington, Connectique audio: combo audio, écouteurs et micro, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: SD, SDHC, SDXC, Brightness Sensor
Réseau
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 20 x 335 x 250
Batterie
94.24 Wh Lithium-Polymère
Système d'exploitation
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Appareil photo
Webcam: HD
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: 2.0, Clavier: chiclet, Rétroéclairage du clavier: oui, adaptateur secteur 150 watts, DVD des pilotes, carte de garantie, documentation, adapteur USB RJ45, Adobe Reader XI, MS Office 365 (version d'essai), utilitaires constructeur, 24 Mois Garantie
Poids
1.886 kg, Alimentation: 470 g
Prix
1 800 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

349 mm 247 mm 25 mm 2.1 kg345 mm 245.1 mm 22.1 mm 1.9 kg345 mm 236 mm 18 mm 1.8 kg335 mm 250 mm 20 mm 1.9 kg335 mm 250 mm 20 mm 1.9 kg
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Gigabyte Aero 14-K8
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
79 MB/s ∼100%
Average of class Multimedia
  (18.1 - 222, n=62, last 2 years)
78.9 MB/s ∼100% 0%
Gigabyte Aero 14-K7
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II))
77 MB/s ∼97% -3%
Schenker XMG P407
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76 MB/s ∼96% -4%
MSI GS43VR 7RE-069US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
19.54 MB/s ∼25% -75%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Multimedia
  (15.9 - 217, n=61, last 2 years)
89.8 MB/s ∼100% +3%
Gigabyte Aero 14-K7
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II))
88 MB/s ∼98% +1%
Schenker XMG P407
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s ∼97% 0%
Gigabyte Aero 14-K8
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s ∼97%
MSI GS43VR 7RE-069US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
19.83 MB/s ∼22% -77%
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Multimedia
  (52 - 1563, n=79, last 2 years)
907 MBit/s ∼100% +127%
MSI GS43VR 7RE-069US
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
582 MBit/s ∼64% +46%
Schenker XMG P407
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
439 MBit/s ∼48% +10%
Gigabyte Aero 14-K8
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
399 MBit/s ∼44%
Gigabyte Aero 14-K7
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
389 MBit/s ∼43% -3%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Multimedia
  (119 - 1490, n=79, last 2 years)
983 MBit/s ∼100% +44%
Gigabyte Aero 14-K8
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
681 MBit/s ∼69%
Gigabyte Aero 14-K7
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
680 MBit/s ∼69% 0%
MSI GS43VR 7RE-069US
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
556 MBit/s ∼57% -18%
Schenker XMG P407
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
480 MBit/s ∼49% -30%
238
cd/m²
258
cd/m²
255
cd/m²
232
cd/m²
256
cd/m²
249
cd/m²
251
cd/m²
254
cd/m²
254
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
AU Optronics B140QAN01.5 (AUO1536)
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 258 cd/m² Moyenne: 249.7 cd/m² Minimum: 8 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 90 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 256 cd/m²
Contraste: 914:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.21 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 1.13 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
96% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
70.26% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.07% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.42
Gigabyte Aero 14-K8
AU Optronics B140QAN01.5 (AUO1536), IPS, 2560x1440
Gigabyte Aero 14-K7
LG Philips LP140QH1-SPF1 (LGD049A), IPS, 2560x1440
Schenker XMG P407
LG Philips LP140WF3-SPD1 (LGD046D), IPS, 1920x1080
MSI GS43VR 7RE-069US
ID: LGD046D, Name: LG Philips LP140WF3-SPD1, IPS, 1920x1080
Razer Blade (2017)
LP140WF3-SPD1, IPS, 1920x1080
Display
-6%
-12%
-8%
Display P3 Coverage
69.07
65.08
-6%
64.47
-7%
66.28
-4%
sRGB Coverage
96
91.2
-5%
82.1
-14%
85.94
-10%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
70.26
65.93
-6%
60.03
-15%
62.84
-11%
Response Times
21%
11%
39%
37%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
47.2 (24, 23.2)
40 (19.6, 20.4)
15%
47 (14, 33)
-0%
31.6 (15.6, 16)
33%
25.2 (18, 17.2)
47%
Response Time Black / White *
34 (19.6, 14.4)
25.2 (13.2, 12)
26%
27 (5, 22)
21%
19.2 (10, 9.2)
44%
24.8 (13.2, 11.6)
27%
PWM Frequency
130 (95)
21190 (99)
21370
Screen
-82%
-82%
-59%
-85%
Brightness middle
256
277
8%
298
16%
306.6
20%
272
6%
Brightness
250
252
1%
282
13%
291
16%
277
11%
Brightness Distribution
90
84
-7%
80
-11%
86
-4%
84
-7%
Black Level *
0.28
0.27
4%
0.27
4%
0.28
-0%
0.26
7%
Contrast
914
1026
12%
1104
21%
1095
20%
1046
14%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.21
4.26
-252%
4.42
-265%
3.9
-222%
4.59
-279%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2.11
8.37
-297%
8.57
-306%
9
-327%
8.49
-302%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.13
4.32
-282%
4.11
-264%
2
-77%
4.28
-279%
Gamma
2.42 91%
2.37 93%
2.5 88%
2.14 103%
2.23 99%
CCT
6422 101%
7298 89%
6329 103%
6626 98%
6848 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
62
59
-5%
54
-13%
56.1
-10%
55
-11%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
96
91
-5%
82
-15%
86.1
-10%
83
-14%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
-22% / -53%
-28% / -56%
-9% / -36%
-24% / -65%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
34 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 19.6 ms hausse
↘ 14.4 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 87 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (24.1 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
47.2 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 24 ms hausse
↘ 23.2 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 75 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (38.3 ms) de tous les appareils testés.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9713 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 151500) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
AS SSD Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark
LatencyMon
Software
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Multimedia
  (41 - 233, n=94, last 2 years)
184 Points ∼100% +5%
Gigabyte Aero 14-K8
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points ∼95%
Gigabyte Aero 14-K7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
162 Points ∼88% -7%
Razer Blade (2017)
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
154 Points ∼84% -12%
MSI GS43VR 7RE-069US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
154 Points ∼84% -12%
Schenker XMG P407
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
149 Points ∼81% -15%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Gigabyte Aero 14-K8
Intel Core i7-8750H
1064 Points ∼100%
Average of class Multimedia
  (125 - 1815, n=103, last 2 years)
917 Points ∼86% -14%
Gigabyte Aero 14-K7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
744 Points ∼70% -30%
Schenker XMG P407
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
738 Points ∼69% -31%
MSI GS43VR 7RE-069US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
732 Points ∼69% -31%
Razer Blade (2017)
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
729 Points ∼69% -31%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Gigabyte Aero 14-K8
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.96 Points ∼100%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.51 - 2.28, n=9, last 2 years)
1.823 Points ∼93% -7%
MSI GS43VR 7RE-069US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.78 Points ∼91% -9%
Gigabyte Aero 14-K7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.71 Points ∼87% -13%
Schenker XMG P407
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.66 Points ∼85% -15%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Gigabyte Aero 14-K8
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.14 Points ∼100%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1.61 - 17.8, n=9, last 2 years)
9.86 Points ∼81% -19%
Gigabyte Aero 14-K7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.19 Points ∼67% -33%
MSI GS43VR 7RE-069US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.15 Points ∼67% -33%
Schenker XMG P407
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.08 Points ∼67% -33%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970980990100010101020103010401050Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.96 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
12.14 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
175 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1064 Points
Aide
PCMark 10 - Score
MSI GS43VR 7RE-069US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS128G39MNC-3510A
4807 Points ∼100% +1%
Gigabyte Aero 14-K8
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Crucial MX300 CT525MX300SSD1
4750 Points ∼99%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1144 - 6514, n=85, last 2 years)
4664 Points ∼97% -2%
Gigabyte Aero 14-K7
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
4339 Points ∼90% -9%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Schenker XMG P407
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e
4069 Points ∼100% +4%
Gigabyte Aero 14-K7
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
3962 Points ∼97% +2%
Razer Blade (2017)
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
3958 Points ∼97% +2%
MSI GS43VR 7RE-069US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS128G39MNC-3510A
3918 Points ∼96% +1%
Gigabyte Aero 14-K8
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Crucial MX300 CT525MX300SSD1
3894 Points ∼96%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1371 - 5364, n=63, last 2 years)
3793 Points ∼93% -3%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Schenker XMG P407
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e
5234 Points ∼100% +5%
Razer Blade (2017)
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
5008 Points ∼96% +1%
Gigabyte Aero 14-K8
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Crucial MX300 CT525MX300SSD1
4973 Points ∼95%
Gigabyte Aero 14-K7
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
4822 Points ∼92% -3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2594 - 5681, n=62, last 2 years)
4713 Points ∼90% -5%
MSI GS43VR 7RE-069US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS128G39MNC-3510A
4672 Points ∼89% -6%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3894 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4973 points
PCMark 10 Score
4750 points
Aide
Gigabyte Aero 14-K8
Crucial MX300 CT525MX300SSD1
Gigabyte Aero 14-K7
Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL
Schenker XMG P407
Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e
MSI GS43VR 7RE-069US
SK Hynix HFS128G39MNC-3510A
Razer Blade (2017)
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
AS SSD
232%
243%
13%
Seq Read
490.98
2425.01
394%
2606.54
431%
509.04
4%
Seq Write
471.37
1334.99
183%
1313.34
179%
366.57
-22%
4K Read
19.42
48.6
150%
52.99
173%
30.35
56%
4K Write
71.79
121.38
69%
140.93
96%
86.24
20%
Score Read
409
1829
347%
1840
350%
455
11%
Score Write
397
1181
197%
1158
192%
435
10%
Score Total
1020
3894
282%
3879
280%
1126
10%
Crucial MX300 CT525MX300SSD1
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 523.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 483.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 217.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 193.3 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 469.8 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 411.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 25.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 75.96 MB/s
3DMark 11 Performance
9109 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
26663 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
6856 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
2512 points
Aide
0123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GS43VR 7RE-069US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
11979 Points ∼100% +57%
Razer Blade (2017)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
10853 Points ∼91% +42%
Schenker XMG P407
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
8376 Points ∼70% +10%
Gigabyte Aero 14-K8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
7637 Points ∼64%
Gigabyte Aero 14-K7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
7608 Points ∼64% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1065 - 23674, n=90, last 2 years)
6398 Points ∼53% -16%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GS43VR 7RE-069US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
15074 Points ∼100% +64%
Razer Blade (2017)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
13870 Points ∼92% +51%
Schenker XMG P407
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
10402 Points ∼69% +13%
Gigabyte Aero 14-K7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
9716 Points ∼64% +6%
Gigabyte Aero 14-K8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
9181 Points ∼61%
Average of class Multimedia
  (765 - 31866, n=83, last 2 years)
8788 Points ∼58% -4%
Far Cry 5 - 2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T
Gigabyte Aero 14-K8
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H
27 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
  (25 - 27, n=2)
26 fps ∼96% -4%
Kingdom Come: Deliverance - 2560x1440 Ultra High Preset
Gigabyte Aero 14-K8
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H
17.9 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
  (16.9 - 17.9, n=2)
17.4 fps ∼97% -3%
Fortnite - 2560x1440 Epic Preset
Gigabyte Aero 14-K8
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H
34.8 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
  (28.8 - 34.8, n=2)
31.8 fps ∼91% -9%
Star Wars Battlefront 2 - 2560x1440 Ultra Preset
Gigabyte Aero 14-K8
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H
26 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
  (19.5 - 26, n=2)
22.8 fps ∼88% -12%
Need for Speed Payback - 2560x1440 Ultra Preset
Gigabyte Aero 14-K8
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H
34 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
  (30.3 - 34, n=2)
32.2 fps ∼95% -5%
Call of Duty WWII - 2560x1440 Extra / On AA:Filmic T2X SM
Gigabyte Aero 14-K8
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H
39.9 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
  (30.8 - 39.9, n=2)
35.4 fps ∼89% -11%
Assassin´s Creed Origins - 2560x1440 Ultra High Preset
Gigabyte Aero 14-K8
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H
26 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
  (20 - 26, n=2)
23 fps ∼88% -12%
ELEX - 2560x1440 Ultra / On AA:SM AF:16x
Gigabyte Aero 14-K8
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H
21.8 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
  (19.6 - 21.8, n=2)
20.7 fps ∼95% -5%
The Evil Within 2 - 2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:FXAA + T
Gigabyte Aero 14-K8
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H
21.1 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
 
21.1 fps ∼100% 0%
Middle-earth: Shadow of War - 2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T
Gigabyte Aero 14-K8
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H
22 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
  (20 - 22, n=2)
21 fps ∼95% -5%
Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus - 2560x1440 Extreme Preset AA:SM AF:16x
Gigabyte Aero 14-K8
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H
23.2 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
 
23.2 fps ∼100% 0%
Bas Moyen Élevé UltraQHD
The Witcher 3 (2015) 47.1 26 fps
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) 44 33 fps
The Evil Within 2 (2017) 32.8 30.7 fps
ELEX (2017) 44.9 34.3 21.8 fps
Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus (2017) 49.3 44.3 23.2 fps
Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017) 43 36 26 fps
Call of Duty WWII (2017) 69 53.8 39.9 fps
Need for Speed Payback (2017) 56.3 52.4 34 fps
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) 58.3 41.4 26 fps
Fortnite (2018) 79.2 58 34.8 fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 37.4 24.6 fps
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) 37.5 27.7 17.9 fps
Far Cry 5 (2018) 44 40 27 fps

Degré de la nuisance sonore

Au repos
31 / 32 / 37 dB(A)
Fortement sollicité
50 / 53 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencieux
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
bruyant
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (à 15 cm de distance)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Gigabyte Aero 14-K8
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H
Gigabyte Aero 14-K7
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
Schenker XMG P407
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
MSI GS43VR 7RE-069US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
Razer Blade (2017)
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
Average of class Multimedia
 
Noise
-0%
5%
-5%
6%
14%
off / environment *
30
30
-0%
29
3%
28
7%
28.1 (24 - 30.7, n=81, last 2 years)
6%
Idle Minimum *
31
32
-3%
31
-0%
33
-6%
30
3%
28.7 (24 - 32.4, n=81, last 2 years)
7%
Idle Average *
32
33
-3%
32
-0%
34.5
-8%
30
6%
28.9 (24.4 - 36, n=81, last 2 years)
10%
Idle Maximum *
37
38
-3%
36
3%
35
5%
30
19%
29.9 (24.6 - 41, n=81, last 2 years)
19%
Load Average *
50
46
8%
43
14%
54.2
-8%
51
-2%
38.4 (26.7 - 51, n=81, last 2 years)
23%
Witcher 3 ultra *
46
46
-0%
56.7
-23%
Load Maximum *
53
53
-0%
48
9%
54.2
-2%
51
4%
42.5 (32.3 - 58.8, n=81, last 2 years)
20%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

 48 °C50 °C53 °C 
 43 °C45 °C41 °C 
 34 °C35 °C36 °C 
Maximum: 53 °C
Moyenne: 42.8 °C
55 °C59 °C52 °C
51 °C52 °C44 °C
38 °C39 °C38 °C
Maximum: 59 °C
Moyenne: 47.6 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  49 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 31 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 36.6 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 59 °C / 138 F, compared to the average of 39 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.3 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 31 °C / 88 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the device average of 31 °C / 88 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36 °C / 96.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-7.1 °C / -12.8 F).
Gigabyte Aero 14-K8
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H
Gigabyte Aero 14-K7
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
Schenker XMG P407
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
MSI GS43VR 7RE-069US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
Razer Blade (2017)
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
Average of class Multimedia
 
Heat
1%
3%
-15%
0%
Maximum Upper Side *
53
51
4%
49
8%
47.8
10%
44.1 (31.6 - 58.4, n=83, last 2 years)
17%
Maximum Bottom *
59
58
2%
50.8
14%
63.2
-7%
47.4 (34.5 - 72, n=83, last 2 years)
20%
Idle Upper Side *
24
24
-0%
26.3
-10%
29.8
-24%
27.7 (22.4 - 37, n=82, last 2 years)
-15%
Idle Bottom *
24
25
-4%
24.1
-0%
33.2
-38%
29.2 (22.8 - 44, n=82, last 2 years)
-22%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.549.22534.541.43129.832.94037.838.15029.628.86327.927.980293110034.934.512528.439.616025.655.720026.762.425022.867.231520.269.840019.271.250018.468.663017.870.680017.769.110001867.9125017.764.2160017.267.9200017.266.8250017.463.7315017.364.9400017.463.7500017.365.5630017.364.3800017.362.61000017.464.41250017.366.41600017.256.5SPL30.178.5N1.448median 17.7median 64.9Delta2.74.231.633.231.631.73031.735.331.435.330.229.930.230.538.330.529.827.229.833.92633.943.226.443.250.723.850.751.723.451.746.222.546.250.321.150.356.920.456.96219.96261.519.361.560.418.360.465.517.865.568.317.568.365.417.865.46617.6666917.76968.117.768.163.517.863.563.51863.561.718.261.763.318.263.35318.45349.918.449.946.718.346.741.718.441.77730.37738.91.438.9median 61.5median 18.3median 61.57.41.27.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseGigabyte Aero 14-K8Razer Blade (2017) UHD
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Gigabyte Aero 14-K8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 0.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Razer Blade (2017) UHD audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (69.03 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 14% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.3 / 0.6 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 7 / 10 / 13 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 73 / 143 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Gigabyte Aero 14-K8
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H
Gigabyte Aero 14-K7
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
Schenker XMG P407
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ
MSI GS43VR 7RE-069US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
Razer Blade (2017)
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
Average of class Multimedia
 
Power Consumption
-22%
-35%
-15%
-5%
11%
Idle Minimum *
7
9
-29%
10
-43%
9.1
-30%
7.5
-7%
5.82 (2.4 - 28.6, n=81, last 2 years)
17%
Idle Average *
10
14
-40%
15
-50%
11.9
-19%
12.1
-21%
10.2 (3 - 26.5, n=81, last 2 years)
-2%
Idle Maximum *
13
19
-46%
24
-85%
12.2
6%
14.3
-10%
13.7 (4.6 - 42, n=81, last 2 years)
-5%
Load Average *
73
84
-15%
82
-12%
77
-5%
73.5
-1%
65.7 (21.1 - 150, n=81, last 2 years)
10%
Witcher 3 ultra *
96
95
1%
126.4
-32%
108
-13%
Load Maximum *
143
149
-4%
124
13%
153
-7%
110.2
23%
94.2 (20.2 - 235, n=81, last 2 years)
34%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
Au repos (module WiFi éteint, luminosité au minimum)
17h 37min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
11h 02min
Fortement sollicité (luminosité au maximum)
3h 9min
Gigabyte Aero 14-K8
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, 94.24 Wh
Gigabyte Aero 14-K7
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, 94.24 Wh
Schenker XMG P407
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, 45 Wh
MSI GS43VR 7RE-069US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, 61 Wh
Razer Blade (2017)
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, 70 Wh
Average of class Multimedia
 
Autonomie de la batterie
-17%
-58%
-60%
-18%
-21%
Reader / Idle
1057
955
-10%
443
-58%
537
-49%
1120 (274 - 2407, n=51, last 2 years)
6%
WiFi v1.3
662
536
-19%
241
-64%
173
-74%
545
-18%
503 (198 - 912, n=84, last 2 years)
-24%
Load
189
146
-23%
92
-51%
79
-58%
106 (41 - 265, n=66, last 2 years)
-44%
H.264
470
213
654 (284 - 1122, n=26, last 2 years)

Points positifs

+ certification X-Rite Pantone
+ châssis fin et léger
+ matériaux du châssis premium
+ excellentes finitions
+ bonne autonomie
+ design sobre
+ utilitaires constructeur pratiques
+ Thunderbolt 3

Points négatifs

- pas de bordures d'écran étroites comme sur l'Aero 15
- temps de réponse moyens de l'écran
- ventilateurs bruyants en cas de sollicitations
The Aero 14 v8, test device courtesy of Gigabyte Germany.
The Aero 14 v8, test device courtesy of Gigabyte Germany.

Le Gigabyte Aero 14 de 2018 est un impressionnant appareil tout-en-un. Il possède un châssis élégant, robuste et fin, et intègre des composants assez puissants pour un usage professionnel ou personnel.

L’Aero 14 gère cet équilibre mieux qu’aucun autre. La combinaison d’un Core i7-8750H et d’une GeForce GTX 1050 Ti signifie que l’Aero 14 peut être très bruyant en cas de sollicitations. Heureusement, Gigabyte propose différentes modes de ventilation, qui permettent à l’Aero 14 de rester silencieux au ralenti et lors de tâches simples.

L’appareil ne possède pas non plus d’inconvénient majeur. Alors que les temps de réponse de l’écran pourraient être meilleurs, l’Aero 14 est conçu avec autre chose que le jeu en tête. La résolution élevée et la précision des couleurs certifiée X-Rite Pantone montrent que Gigabyte cible également le secteur professionnel. Le Thunderbolt 3 est aussi de la partie, et les haut-parleurs satisferont beaucoup d’utilisateurs.

Le plus gros point fort de l’appareil est son autonomie, qui fait du Gigabyte Aero un appareil polyvalent.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Gigabyte Aero 14-K8 - 05/14/2020 v7
Florian Glaser

Châssis
81 / 98 → 83%
Clavier
81%
Dispositif de pointage
81%
Connectivité
63 / 80 → 78%
Poids
64 / 20-72 → 85%
Autonomie
89 / 95 → 93%
Écran
90%
Performances en jeu
78 / 90 → 87%
Performances dans les applications
86 / 90 → 95%
Chauffe
81%
Nuisance sonore
66 / 95 → 69%
Audio
75%
Appareil photo
50 / 85 → 59%
Moyenne
76%
84%
Multimedia - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Gigabyte Aero 14
Gigabyte Aero 14
Gigabyte Aero 14
Gigabyte Aero 14
Gigabyte Aero 14
Gigabyte Aero 14
Gigabyte Aero 14
Alex Alderson
Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - Senior Tech Writer - 3621 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018
contact me via: @aldersonaj
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Courte critique du PC portable Gigabyte Aero 14 v8 (i7-8750H, GTX 1050 Ti, QHD)
Florian Glaser, 2018-04-26 (Update: 2018-04-26)