Notebookcheck

Courte critique du smartphone UleFone Metal

Bonne conception et bon marché Le méconnu constructeur chinois UleFone propose ici un nouvel appareil d'entrée de gamme. Le téléphone n'est pas cher, et pourtant comme son nom le suggère, l'UleFone Metal peut se targuer d'une finition métallique, ainsi que de bonnes caractéristiques techniques.
Marcus Herbrich, Manuel Masiero (traduit par Nicolas L.),
Ulefone Metal
Processeur
Mediatek MT6753 8 x 1.3 GHz, Cortex-A53
Carte graphique
Mémoire
3072 Mo 
Écran
5.00 pouces 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 294 PPP, capacitif, LCD, IPS, brillant: oui
Disque dur
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 Go 
, 11.79 Go libres
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, Connectique audio: audio jack 3,5 mm , Lecteur de cartes mémoires: microSD jusqu'à 128GB, 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: proximité, accéléromètre, boussole, effet Hall, OTG, Miracast
Réseau
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 4.0, 2G: 850/900/1,800/1,900 MHz; 3G: 900/2,100 MHz; LTE: 800/900/1,800/2,100/2,600 MHz, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 9.35 x 143 x 71
Batterie
3050 mAh Lithium-Ion, Sony, Autonomie de la batterie (selon les données du fabricant): 320 h
Système d'exploitation
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 13 MPix f/2.0
Appareil photo secondaire: 5 MPix
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: Mono, Clavier: virtuel, Rétroéclairage du clavier: oui, chargeur modulaire, câble USB , UleFone UI, 12 Mois Garantie, fanless
Poids
155 g, Alimentation: 42 g
Prix
120 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

154.5 mm 76 mm 8.8 mm 199 g145 mm 73.1 mm 9.9 mm 177 g145 mm 72 mm 9.4 mm 152 g144 mm 72 mm 8.8 mm 141 g143 mm 71 mm 9.35 mm 155 g143 mm 72 mm 7.6 mm 125 g140 mm 69.1 mm 7.3 mm 153 g
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
303 MBit/s ∼100% +243%
Ulefone Metal
Mali-T720, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash
88.3 MBit/s ∼29%
TP-Link Neffos C5
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
44.9 MBit/s ∼15% -49%
Wiko Lenny 3
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash
44.8 MBit/s ∼15% -49%
Archos 50e Neon
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 8 GB eMMC Flash
42 MBit/s ∼14% -52%
UHANS S1
Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash
30.4 MBit/s ∼10% -66%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
290 MBit/s ∼100% +297%
Ulefone Metal
Mali-T720, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash
73.1 MBit/s ∼25%
UHANS S1
Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash
50.9 MBit/s ∼18% -30%
TP-Link Neffos C5
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.3 MBit/s ∼17% -33%
Wiko Lenny 3
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.2 MBit/s ∼17% -33%
Archos 50e Neon
Mali-400 MP2, MT6580M, 8 GB eMMC Flash
46 MBit/s ∼16% -37%
GPS Ulefone Metal
GPS Ulefone Metal
GPS Ulefone Metal
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Cliquer pour charger les images
338
cd/m²
317
cd/m²
301
cd/m²
333
cd/m²
312
cd/m²
295
cd/m²
337
cd/m²
310
cd/m²
293
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
LCD
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 338 cd/m² Moyenne: 315.1 cd/m² Minimum: 23.8 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 87 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 312 cd/m²
Contraste: 557:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.56 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.8 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 7.1 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
Gamma: 2.77
Ulefone Metal
IPS, 1280x720, 5.00
Archos 50e Neon
TFT, 854x480, 5.00
Coolpad Porto S
IPS, 1280x720, 5.00
Wiko Lenny 3
IPS, 1280x720, 5.00
UHANS S1
IPS, 1280x720, 5.00
TP-Link Neffos C5
IPS, 1280x720, 5.00
UMI Touch
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.50
Screen
-16%
6%
15%
-8%
23%
18%
66%
Brightness middle
312
443
42%
407
30%
374
20%
525
68%
508
63%
424
36%
554
78%
Brightness
315
430
37%
403
28%
343
9%
471
50%
491
56%
415
32%
552
75%
Brightness Distribution
87
94
8%
92
6%
85
-2%
82
-6%
89
2%
91
5%
96
10%
Black Level *
0.56
0.38
32%
0.5
11%
0.47
16%
0.92
-64%
0.58
-4%
0.54
4%
Contrast
557
1166
109%
814
46%
796
43%
571
3%
876
57%
785
41%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.8
13.9
-104%
7.9
-16%
6
12%
8.6
-26%
7
-3%
6.9
-1%
1.59
77%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
14
29.5
-111%
18.2
-30%
11.9
15%
19.4
-39%
14.1
-1%
10.9
22%
2.56
82%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7.1
17.3
-144%
8.9
-25%
6.7
6%
10.6
-49%
6.1
14%
6.8
4%
2.01
72%
Gamma
2.77 79%
2.93 75%
2.46 89%
2.19 100%
2.34 94%
2.15 102%
1.99 111%
2.01 109%
CCT
7402 88%
22878 28%
8332 78%
8073 81%
9487 69%
8068 81%
8131 80%
6321 103%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
82.12
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.98

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
28 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 11 ms hausse
↘ 17 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences relativement élevées, insuffisant pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 60 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (24.3 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
250 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 19 ms hausse
↘ 231 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 100 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (38.6 ms) de tous les appareils testés.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9604 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (Classer selon les valeurs)
Ulefone Metal
27.6 MB/s ∼32%
Archos 50e Neon
18.87 MB/s ∼22% -32%
Wiko Lenny 3
19.59 MB/s ∼22% -29%
UHANS S1
20.71 MB/s ∼24% -25%
TP-Link Neffos C5
18.89 MB/s ∼22% -32%
UMI Touch
21.02 MB/s ∼24% -24%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
50.36 MB/s ∼58% +82%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (Classer selon les valeurs)
Ulefone Metal
49.6 MB/s ∼51%
Archos 50e Neon
35.27 MB/s ∼37% -29%
Wiko Lenny 3
40.59 MB/s ∼42% -18%
UHANS S1
48.15 MB/s ∼50% -3%
TP-Link Neffos C5
39.11 MB/s ∼41% -21%
UMI Touch
42.92 MB/s ∼44% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
76.43 MB/s ∼79% +54%
Random Write 4KB (Classer selon les valeurs)
Ulefone Metal
7.87 MB/s ∼2%
Archos 50e Neon
5.18 MB/s ∼2% -34%
Coolpad Porto S
13.95 MB/s ∼4% +77%
Wiko Lenny 3
6.2 MB/s ∼2% -21%
UHANS S1
12.95 MB/s ∼4% +65%
TP-Link Neffos C5
6.85 MB/s ∼2% -13%
UMI Touch
14.63 MB/s ∼5% +86%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
15.79 MB/s ∼5% +101%
Random Read 4KB (Classer selon les valeurs)
Ulefone Metal
22.18 MB/s ∼6%
Archos 50e Neon
15.29 MB/s ∼4% -31%
Coolpad Porto S
22.52 MB/s ∼6% +2%
Wiko Lenny 3
15.1 MB/s ∼4% -32%
UHANS S1
20.25 MB/s ∼5% -9%
TP-Link Neffos C5
17.16 MB/s ∼5% -23%
UMI Touch
19.88 MB/s ∼5% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
86.71 MB/s ∼24% +291%
Sequential Write 256KB (Classer selon les valeurs)
Ulefone Metal
39.91 MB/s ∼3%
Archos 50e Neon
8.33 MB/s ∼1% -79%
Coolpad Porto S
39.99 MB/s ∼3% 0%
Wiko Lenny 3
11.6 MB/s ∼1% -71%
UHANS S1
74.4 MB/s ∼6% +86%
TP-Link Neffos C5
52.43 MB/s ∼4% +31%
UMI Touch
72.47 MB/s ∼5% +82%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
145.11 MB/s ∼11% +264%
Sequential Read 256KB (Classer selon les valeurs)
Ulefone Metal
228.84 MB/s ∼11%
Archos 50e Neon
130.29 MB/s ∼6% -43%
Coolpad Porto S
168.23 MB/s ∼8% -26%
Wiko Lenny 3
132.5 MB/s ∼7% -42%
UHANS S1
240.77 MB/s ∼12% +5%
TP-Link Neffos C5
145.77 MB/s ∼7% -36%
UMI Touch
219.3 MB/s ∼11% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
487.34 MB/s ∼24% +113%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Ulefone Metal
37103 Points ∼13%
Archos 50e Neon
24509 Points ∼8% -34%
Coolpad Porto S
25415 Points ∼9% -32%
Wiko Lenny 3
25237 Points ∼9% -32%
UHANS S1
39029 Points ∼13% +5%
TP-Link Neffos C5
32681 Points ∼11% -12%
UMI Touch
38617 Points ∼13% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
128749 Points ∼44% +247%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Ulefone Metal
1057 Points ∼20%
Wiko Lenny 3
Points ∼0% -100%
UHANS S1
993 Points ∼19% -6%
TP-Link Neffos C5
810 Points ∼15% -23%
UMI Touch
1045 Points ∼20% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2002 (1539min) Points ∼38% +89%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Ulefone Metal
243 Points ∼1%
Wiko Lenny 3
Points ∼0% -100%
UHANS S1
248 Points ∼1% +2%
TP-Link Neffos C5
167 Points ∼1% -31%
UMI Touch
241 Points ∼1% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3015 (2895min) Points ∼18% +1141%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Ulefone Metal
293 Points ∼3%
Wiko Lenny 3
Points ∼0% -100%
UHANS S1
298 Points ∼3% +2%
TP-Link Neffos C5
203 Points ∼2% -31%
UMI Touch
291 Points ∼3% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2710 (2421min) Points ∼24% +825%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Ulefone Metal
10371 Points ∼11%
Archos 50e Neon
7848 Points ∼8% -24%
Coolpad Porto S
7413 Points ∼8% -29%
Wiko Lenny 3
7849 Points ∼8% -24%
UHANS S1
10211 Points ∼11% -2%
TP-Link Neffos C5
9291 Points ∼10% -10%
UMI Touch
10368 Points ∼11% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
19610 Points ∼20% +89%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Ulefone Metal
6469 Points ∼1%
Archos 50e Neon
2485 Points ∼0% -62%
Coolpad Porto S
2590 Points ∼0% -60%
Wiko Lenny 3
2476 Points ∼0% -62%
UHANS S1
6705 Points ∼1% +4%
TP-Link Neffos C5
4223 Points ∼1% -35%
UMI Touch
6186 Points ∼1% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
33031 Points ∼5% +411%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Ulefone Metal
7059 Points ∼2%
Archos 50e Neon
2930 Points ∼1% -58%
Coolpad Porto S
3028 Points ∼1% -57%
Wiko Lenny 3
2920 Points ∼1% -59%
UHANS S1
7259 Points ∼3% +3%
TP-Link Neffos C5
4906 Points ∼2% -31%
UMI Touch
6795 Points ∼2% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
28671 Points ∼10% +306%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Ulefone Metal
19 fps ∼0%
Archos 50e Neon
11 fps ∼0% -42%
Coolpad Porto S
8.6 fps ∼0% -55%
Wiko Lenny 3
4.4 fps ∼0% -77%
TP-Link Neffos C5
14 fps ∼0% -26%
UMI Touch
12 fps ∼0% -37%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
81 fps ∼1% +326%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Ulefone Metal
12 fps ∼0%
Archos 50e Neon
4.4 fps ∼0% -63%
Coolpad Porto S
4.8 fps ∼0% -60%
Wiko Lenny 3
8 fps ∼0% -33%
TP-Link Neffos C5
8.3 fps ∼0% -31%
UMI Touch
12 fps ∼0% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
51 fps ∼2% +325%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Ulefone Metal
2.9 fps ∼0%
Coolpad Porto S
3.6 fps ∼0% +24%
Wiko Lenny 3
fps ∼0% -100%
TP-Link Neffos C5
6.1 fps ∼1% +110%
UMI Touch
4.5 fps ∼0% +55%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
38 fps ∼4% +1210%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Ulefone Metal
6.4 fps ∼2%
Coolpad Porto S
1.6 fps ∼0% -75%
Wiko Lenny 3
fps ∼0% -100%
TP-Link Neffos C5
2.8 fps ∼1% -56%
UMI Touch
4.5 fps ∼1% -30%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
27 fps ∼7% +322%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Ulefone Metal
8.9 fps ∼0%
Wiko Lenny 3
fps ∼0% -100%
UMI Touch
2.9 fps ∼0% -67%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
28 fps ∼1% +215%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Ulefone Metal
4.5 fps ∼0%
Wiko Lenny 3
fps ∼0% -100%
UMI Touch
2.9 fps ∼0% -36%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
15 fps ∼0% +233%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Ulefone Metal
4079 Points ∼20%
Archos 50e Neon
2796 Points ∼14% -31%
Coolpad Porto S
2893 Points ∼14% -29%
Wiko Lenny 3
2832 Points ∼14% -31%
UHANS S1
4191 Points ∼21% +3%
TP-Link Neffos C5
3443 Points ∼17% -16%
UMI Touch
3787 Points ∼19% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4660 Points ∼23% +14%
BaseMark OS II
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
Ulefone Metal
10 Points ∼0%
Archos 50e Neon
525 Points ∼26% +5150%
Coolpad Porto S
599 Points ∼29% +5890%
Wiko Lenny 3
632 Points ∼31% +6220%
UHANS S1
640 Points ∼31% +6300%
TP-Link Neffos C5
638 Points ∼31% +6280%
UMI Touch
576 Points ∼28% +5660%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
994 Points ∼49% +9840%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Ulefone Metal
433 Points ∼2%
Archos 50e Neon
138 Points ∼0% -68%
Coolpad Porto S
173 Points ∼1% -60%
Wiko Lenny 3
138 Points ∼0% -68%
UHANS S1
431 Points ∼1% 0%
TP-Link Neffos C5
281 Points ∼1% -35%
UMI Touch
429 Points ∼1% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2203 Points ∼8% +409%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
Ulefone Metal
802 Points ∼9%
Archos 50e Neon
317 Points ∼4% -60%
Coolpad Porto S
467 Points ∼5% -42%
Wiko Lenny 3
293 Points ∼3% -63%
UHANS S1
843 Points ∼9% +5%
TP-Link Neffos C5
991 Points ∼11% +24%
UMI Touch
787 Points ∼9% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2072 Points ∼23% +158%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
Ulefone Metal
1691 Points ∼10%
Archos 50e Neon
990 Points ∼6% -41%
Coolpad Porto S
905 Points ∼5% -46%
Wiko Lenny 3
988 Points ∼6% -42%
UHANS S1
1281 Points ∼8% -24%
TP-Link Neffos C5
1199 Points ∼7% -29%
UMI Touch
1343 Points ∼8% -21%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4080 Points ∼25% +141%
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
Ulefone Metal
273 Points ∼3%
Archos 50e Neon
389 Points ∼5% +42%
Coolpad Porto S
458 Points ∼5% +68%
Wiko Lenny 3
399 Points ∼5% +46%
UHANS S1
807 Points ∼10% +196%
TP-Link Neffos C5
683 Points ∼8% +150%
UMI Touch
717 Points ∼8% +163%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2074 Points ∼25% +660%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Ulefone Metal
13397.3 ms * ∼23%
Archos 50e Neon
15157.3 ms * ∼25% -13%
Coolpad Porto S
32901.1 ms * ∼55% -146%
Wiko Lenny 3
14862.9 ms * ∼25% -11%
UHANS S1
12510.3 ms * ∼21% +7%
TP-Link Neffos C5
12783.4 ms * ∼21% +5%
UMI Touch
13953 ms * ∼23% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2564.1 ms * ∼4% +81%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Ulefone Metal
17.831 Points ∼5%
Archos 50e Neon
14.118 Points ∼4% -21%
Coolpad Porto S
14.168 Points ∼4% -21%
Wiko Lenny 3
14.068 Points ∼4% -21%
UHANS S1
18.415 Points ∼5% +3%
TP-Link Neffos C5
18.209 Points ∼5% +2%
UMI Touch
17.614 Points ∼5% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
75.12 Points ∼19% +321%
Octane V2 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Ulefone Metal
2738 Points ∼5%
Archos 50e Neon
2103 Points ∼4% -23%
Coolpad Porto S
2088 Points ∼4% -24%
Wiko Lenny 3
2133 Points ∼4% -22%
UHANS S1
2972 Points ∼5% +9%
TP-Link Neffos C5
2738 Points ∼5% 0%
UMI Touch
2562 Points ∼4% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
13191 Points ∼22% +382%

Légende

 
Ulefone Metal Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Archos 50e Neon Mediatek MT6580M, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Coolpad Porto S Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Wiko Lenny 3 Mediatek MT6580M, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
UHANS S1 Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
TP-Link Neffos C5 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
UMI Touch Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

 40.7 °C37.4 °C38.6 °C 
 39.8 °C37.4 °C39.7 °C 
 38.6 °C37.1 °C37.9 °C 
Maximum: 40.7 °C
Moyenne: 38.6 °C
36.7 °C37.1 °C37.3 °C
36.8 °C37.4 °C37.5 °C
36.6 °C37.4 °C37.4 °C
Maximum: 37.5 °C
Moyenne: 37.1 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  44.5 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 21.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-350
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2020.622.921.920.62520.721.720.320.73122.32123.622.34022.626.934.422.65021.222.321.921.26317.820.318.917.88017.918.118.617.910022.522.823.922.512534.733.236.134.716016.72617.216.720016.433.215.816.425019.438.919.119.431522.345.519.122.340027.552.717.927.550033.658.319.133.663039.163.216.139.180043.466.515.543.4100042.764.716.442.7125039.26213.739.2160036.8601336.8200034.857.913.934.8250034.558.911.434.5315037.861.110.737.8400039.16310.339.1500041.464.29.841.4630042.7689.442.7800048.271.69.548.21000040.764.99.440.71250030.755.79.630.71600026.850.39.426.8SPL52.876.426.652.8N8.337.30.98.3median 34.8median 58.9median 13.9median 34.8Delta6.79.24.16.737.432.437.432.831.332.828.331.728.343.52643.541.939.441.931.736.231.727.728.627.727.625.427.623.221.323.225.823.325.824.322.524.326.122.426.13521.3354518.44556.417.556.463.117.563.171.917.271.974.616.874.676.117.376.174.517.474.57616.67674.217.374.270.817.670.872.417.672.472.617.772.674.717.474.775.317.775.373.817.973.865.818.165.850.418.150.485.529.885.560.71.360.7median 70.8median 17.7median 70.816.51.616.5383832.43837.530.731.337.531.133.431.731.131.530.62631.537.238.439.437.232.236.236.232.226.529.328.626.526.225.125.426.225.626.321.325.623.530.623.323.520.926.322.520.924.523.922.424.532.321.121.332.34322.618.44356.528.217.556.56336.317.56369.443.517.269.471.44516.871.468.942.817.368.970.642.817.470.670.642.116.670.674.446.417.374.477.450.217.677.476.548.817.676.575.147.417.775.171.944.717.471.969.542.517.769.563.23517.963.255.525.818.155.548.121.718.148.184.857.429.884.855.310.41.355.3median 63.2median 36.3median 17.7median 63.215.49.71.615.435.945.932.435.935.635.831.335.629.329.131.729.328.926.52628.939.938.939.439.929.73536.229.728.126.928.628.123.82725.423.825.926.621.325.928.72423.328.731.923.522.531.940.821.522.440.849.428.921.349.454.13418.454.161.443.217.561.469.149.717.569.173.85417.273.876.958.516.876.974.157.417.374.171.352.317.471.370.95116.670.970.550.317.370.574.955.317.674.973.253.317.673.271.952.317.771.974.154.117.474.174.654.517.774.671.251.817.971.262.443.118.162.452.933.418.152.984.965.829.884.961.318.91.361.3median 70.5median 50.3median 17.7median 70.513.2111.613.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseUlefone MetalArchos 50e NeonUHANS S1Coolpad Porto S
Ulefone Metal audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.6% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Archos 50e Neon audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.51 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 43.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 8.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 90% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

UHANS S1 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 37.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (36% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 96% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Coolpad Porto S audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.92 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 37.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 75% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.68 / 0.69 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 1.41 / 2.46 / 2.83 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 5.15 / 7.05 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Ulefone Metal
3050 mAh
Archos 50e Neon
2200 mAh
Coolpad Porto S
2000 mAh
Wiko Lenny 3
2000 mAh
UHANS S1
2200 mAh
TP-Link Neffos C5
2200 mAh
UMI Touch
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3600 mAh
Power Consumption
31%
26%
22%
40%
19%
25%
29%
Idle Minimum *
1.41
0.56
60%
1.16
18%
0.76
46%
0.7
50%
0.72
49%
0.89
37%
0.63
55%
Idle Average *
2.46
1.58
36%
2.21
10%
2.16
12%
1.13
54%
1.87
24%
2
19%
1.1
55%
Idle Maximum *
2.83
1.8
36%
2.24
21%
2.35
17%
1.25
56%
2
29%
2.1
26%
1.56
45%
Load Average *
5.15
5.22
-1%
3.34
35%
4.65
10%
4.39
15%
5.99
-16%
3.87
25%
5.95
-16%
Load Maximum *
7.05
5.34
24%
3.95
44%
5.35
24%
5.43
23%
6.45
9%
5.79
18%
6.7
5%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
6h 43min
Ulefone Metal
3050 mAh
Archos 50e Neon
2200 mAh
Coolpad Porto S
2000 mAh
Wiko Lenny 3
2000 mAh
UHANS S1
2200 mAh
TP-Link Neffos C5
2200 mAh
UMI Touch
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3600 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie
WiFi v1.3
403
498
24%
504
25%
549
36%
309
-23%
453
12%
553
37%
732
82%

Points positifs

+ boîtier en métal
+ scanner d'empreintes digitales
+ dalle IPS
+ 3 GB de RAM
+ performances (entrée de gamme)
+ mémoire eMMC relativement rapide

Points négatifs

- grosse consommation/autonomie moyenne
- luminosité
- contraste
- touches de navigation non rétroéclairées
In review: UleFone Metal. Test model provided by UleFone.

Cet appareil très bon marché créé par UleFone se sort brillamment de notre test, alliant prix bas et performance. La construction, la vitesse d'exécution et l'ensemble de fonctionnalités présentes sont très satisfaisants pour un smartphone d'entrée de gamme.

Le plus gros défaut de l'UleFone Metal est la qualité de sa dalle LCD. L'écran IPS est trop sombre et son contraste est trop faible par rapport à la concurrence. De plus, la consommation d'énergie est trop élevée pour un 5", avec pour conséquence logique une autonomie limitée.

Malgré ses manquements en termes de qualité d'écran et d'autonomie de batterie, l'UleFone Metal est un smartphone d'entrée de gamme intéressant, qui justifie bien un investissement autour de 100€. 

Ceci est une version abrégée du compte-rendu original. Vous pouvez lire la version complète en anglais ici.

Ulefone Metal - 09/23/2016 v5.1(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Châssis
84%
Clavier
60 / 75 → 80%
Dispositif de pointage
86%
Connectivité
40 / 60 → 67%
Poids
92%
Autonomie
89%
Écran
80%
Performances en jeu
19 / 63 → 30%
Performances dans les applications
32 / 70 → 45%
Chauffe
88%
Nuisance sonore
100%
Audio
56 / 91 → 62%
Appareil photo
65%
Moyenne
69%
81%
Smartphone - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Courte critique du smartphone UleFone Metal
Marcus Herbrich, 2016-11- 3 (Update: 2016-11- 3)