Test de l'Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G732LXS (i9-10980HK, RTX 2080 Super, FHD, 300 Hz) : tout-terrain
Note | Date | Modèle | Poids | Épaisseur | Taille | Résolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
83 % | 08/20 | Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile | 2.9 kg | 26.5 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
86 % | 05/19 | MSI GE75 9SG i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | 2.7 kg | 27.5 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
85 % | 08/19 | HP Omen 17-cb0020ng i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | 3.3 kg | 27 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
85 % | 07/19 | Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | 2.9 kg | 26.2 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
87 % | 07/19 | Eurocom Nightsky RX17 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | 2.9 kg | 29.9 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 |
Top 10
» Le Top 10 des PC portables multimédia
» Le Top 10 des PC portables de jeu
» Le Top 10 des PC portables de jeu légers
» Le Top 10 des ordinateurs portables bureautiques
» Le Top 10 des PC portables bureautiques premium/professionnels
» Le Top 10 des Stations de travail mobiles
» Le Top 10 des Ultraportables
» Le Top 10 des Ultrabooks
» Le Top 10 des Convertibles
» Le Top 10 des Tablettes
» Le Top 10 des Tablettes Windows
» Le Top 10 des Smartphones
» Le Top 10 des PC Portables á moins de 300 euros
» Le Top 10 des PC Portables á moins de 500 euros
» Le Top 25 des meilleurs écrans d'ordinateurs
Networking | |
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
Average of class Gaming (141 - 1670, n=378) | |
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Eurocom Nightsky RX17 | |
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 | |
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng | |
Average of class Gaming (144 - 1645, n=378) | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Eurocom Nightsky RX17 | |
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 |
|
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 82 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 310 cd/m²
Contraste: 756:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.41 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7, calibrated: 1.13
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
94% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 72% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.149
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS LQ173M1JW03 (SHP14DC), IPS, 1920x1080 | MSI GE75 9SG Chi Mei N173HCE-G33, AHVA, 1920x1080 | HP Omen 17-cb0020ng CMN175D, IPS, 1920x1080 | Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 AU Optronics AUO409D, IPS, 1920x1080 | Eurocom Nightsky RX17 BOE NV173FHM-N44, IPS, 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Response Times | -2% | -118% | -31% | -104% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 5.8 (2.4, 3.4) | 7.2 (3.8, 3.4) -24% | 17.6 (8.4, 9.2) -203% | 7.2 (3.6, 3.6) -24% | 16.4 (8.4, 8) -183% |
Response Time Black / White * | 8.4 (4.4, 4) | 6.6 (3.2, 3.4) 21% | 11.2 (6, 5.2) -33% | 11.6 (6.4, 5.2) -38% | 10.4 (6, 4.4) -24% |
PWM Frequency | 26040 (10) | 25510 (44) | 990.1 (99) | ||
Screen | 24% | 26% | -26% | -9% | |
Brightness middle | 310 | 400.7 29% | 360 16% | 297.4 -4% | 298.4 -4% |
Brightness | 311 | 372 20% | 342 10% | 306 -2% | 287 -8% |
Brightness Distribution | 82 | 89 9% | 91 11% | 80 -2% | 90 10% |
Black Level * | 0.41 | 0.34 17% | 0.26 37% | 0.31 24% | 0.3 27% |
Contrast | 756 | 1179 56% | 1385 83% | 959 27% | 995 32% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 2.41 | 1.33 45% | 1.91 21% | 4.08 -69% | 3.58 -49% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 8.59 | 3.51 59% | 4.08 53% | 6.88 20% | 6.29 27% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated * | 1.13 | 1.39 -23% | 0.78 31% | 4 -254% | 2.82 -150% |
Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 4.3 | 1.3 70% | 2.72 37% | 4 7% | 3.1 28% |
Gamma | 2.149 102% | 2.24 98% | 2.37 93% | 2.259 97% | 2.24 98% |
CCT | 7059 92% | 6735 97% | 6692 97% | 7205 90% | 7064 92% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 72 | 58.2 -19% | 60 -17% | 56 -22% | 60.2 -16% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 94 | 92.1 -2% | 96 2% | 86 -9% | 92.7 -1% |
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres) | 11% /
20% | -46% /
4% | -29% /
-27% | -57% /
-24% |
* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances
Temps de réponse de l'écran
↔ Temps de réponse noir à blanc | ||
---|---|---|
8.4 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées | ↗ 4.4 ms hausse | |
↘ 4 ms chute | ||
L'écran montre de faibles temps de réponse, un bon écran pour jouer. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (24.3 ms) de tous les appareils testés. | ||
↔ Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80% | ||
5.8 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées | ↗ 2.4 ms hausse | |
↘ 3.4 ms chute | ||
L'écran montre de très faibles temps de réponse, parfait pour le jeu. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (38.5 ms) de tous les appareils testés. |
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé | |||
En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9686 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Eurocom Nightsky RX17 | |
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 | |
Average of class Gaming (77 - 238, n=654) | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng | |
Eurocom Nightsky RX17 | |
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 | |
Average of class Gaming (196 - 2804, n=662) |
Blender 2.79 - BMW27 CPU | |
Average of class Gaming (179 - 901, n=119) | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS |
7-Zip 18.03 | |
7z b 4 | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
Average of class Gaming (3034 - 75612, n=120) | |
7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
Average of class Gaming (2480 - 5811, n=120) | |
MSI GE75 9SG |
Cinebench R20 | |
CPU (Single Core) | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng | |
Average of class Gaming (312 - 577, n=167) | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
CPU (Multi Core) | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Average of class Gaming (1397 - 6321, n=168) | |
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng |
Geekbench 5.3 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
Average of class Gaming (2783 - 11393, n=103) | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
Average of class Gaming (703 - 1487, n=103) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Average of class Gaming (1.7 - 19.8, n=119) |
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
Average of class Gaming (23.9 - 98.2, n=95) | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS |
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
Average of class Gaming (0.507 - 1.088, n=100) | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS |
* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances
PCMark 10 - Score | |
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Eurocom Nightsky RX17 | |
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
Average of class Gaming (2603 - 7511, n=332) |
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS |
* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS 2x Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 (RAID 0) | MSI GE75 9SG Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | HP Omen 17-cb0020ng 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0) | Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | Eurocom Nightsky RX17 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -7% | 11% | -4% | 31% | |
Write 4K | 125.8 | 116.1 -8% | 103.8 -17% | 130.1 3% | 133 6% |
Read 4K | 52.86 | 44.98 -15% | 41.67 -21% | 56.02 6% | 61.58 16% |
Write Seq | 1795 | 2370 32% | 2639 47% | 2935 64% | |
Read Seq | 2315 | 1465 -37% | 2702 17% | 3118 35% | |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 407.1 | 337.5 -17% | 487.3 20% | 465.7 14% | 571.3 40% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 411.9 | 453.6 10% | 555.1 35% | 546.8 33% | 654.2 59% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 2844 | 2399 -16% | 2967 4% | 1766 -38% | 3296 16% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 3130 | 3087 -1% | 3102 -1% | 1921.7 -39% | 3560 14% |
Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
3DMark 06 Standard | 41873 points | |
3DMark Vantage P Result | 69838 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 27065 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 49644 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 20902 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 9629 points | |
Aide |
3DMark | |
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Eurocom Nightsky RX17 | |
Average of class Gaming (1097 - 6934, n=129) | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng | |
Eurocom Nightsky RX17 | |
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 | |
Average of class Gaming (368 - 13013, n=288) | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng | |
Eurocom Nightsky RX17 | |
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 | |
Average of class Gaming (385 - 40636, n=673) |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng | |
Eurocom Nightsky RX17 | |
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 | |
Average of class Gaming (513 - 50983, n=742) |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS | |
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng | |
Eurocom Nightsky RX17 | |
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 | |
Average of class Gaming (12.6 - 115, n=442) |
Bas | Moyen | Élevé | Ultra | QHD | 4K | ||
GTA V (2015) | 185 | 178 | 164 | 92.8 | fps | ||
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 280 | 178 | 93.4 | 66.4 | fps | ||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 168 | 154 | 148 | 134 | fps | ||
Fortnite (2018) | 178 | 171 | 136 | 104 | 52 | fps | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 124 | 95.7 | 42 | fps | |||
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) | 144 | 107 | 75.3 | 56.1 | 33.1 | fps | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 123 | 105 | 88.4 | fps | |||
Monster Hunter World (2018) | 131 | 119 | 102 | 69.1 | 36 | fps | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 136 | 127 | 121 | 84 | 45 | fps | |
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018) | 98 | 85 | 62 | 57 | 38 | fps | |
Hitman 2 (2018) | 104 | 87.8 | 80 | 77.7 | 48.4 | fps | |
Battlefield V (2018) | 169 | 153 | 142 | 115 | 68.7 | fps | |
Darksiders III (2018) | 168 | 143 | 132 | 97.2 | 50.5 | fps | |
Just Cause 4 (2018) | 157 | 120 | 113 | 81.2 | 46 | fps | |
Apex Legends (2019) | 144 | 144 | 144 | 131 | 75.4 | fps | |
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 116 | 113 | 100 | 90 | 55 | fps | |
Metro Exodus (2019) | 116 | 90.2 | 71 | 55.4 | 34.9 | fps | |
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) | 178 | 158 | 91.6 | 74.1 | fps | ||
The Division 2 (2019) | 147 | 131 | 102 | 69 | 36 | fps | |
Anno 1800 (2019) | 122 | 91.7 | 50.6 | 45.3 | 27.1 | fps | |
Rage 2 (2019) | 148 | 127 | 127 | 81.9 | 40.3 | fps | |
F1 2019 (2019) | 224 | 174 | 167 | 130 | 80 | fps | |
Control (2019) | 113 | 87.6 | 58.9 | 29.8 | fps | ||
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 131 | 98 | 88 | 64.6 | 35.2 | fps | |
FIFA 20 (2019) | 281 | 267 | 262 | 258 | 227 | fps | |
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) | 109 | 99 | 74 | 57 | 34 | fps | |
GRID 2019 (2019) | 164 | 120 | 88.7 | 72.5 | 48.8 | fps | |
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019) | 145 | 136 | 115 | 83.6 | 48.3 | fps | |
Need for Speed Heat (2019) | 104 | 91 | 79.4 | 75.3 | 51.3 | fps | |
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) | 121 | 117 | 107 | 86.4 | 49 | fps | |
Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019) | 117 | 79.8 | 52.9 | 42.5 | 27.6 | fps | |
Escape from Tarkov (2020) | 121 | 121 | 121 | 102 | 49.5 | fps | |
Hunt Showdown (2020) | 151 | 120 | 83.1 | 38.4 | fps | ||
Doom Eternal (2020) | 216 | 193 | 191 | 147 | 80.8 | fps | |
Gears Tactics (2020) | 226 | 144 | 106 | 70.3 | 38.4 | fps | |
F1 2020 (2020) | 235 | 175 | 146 | 119 | 72 | fps |
Degré de la nuisance sonore
Au repos |
| 33 / 38 / 45 dB(A) |
Fortement sollicité |
| 54 / 55 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silencieux 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) bruyant |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile | MSI GE75 9SG i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | HP Omen 17-cb0020ng i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | Eurocom Nightsky RX17 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 9% | 3% | 8% | 10% | 10% | |
off / environment * | 25 | 28.2 -13% | 30 -20% | 28.2 -13% | 28 -12% | 28.8 (24 - 32, n=431) -15% |
Idle Minimum * | 33 | 30.4 8% | 34 -3% | 28.2 15% | 28 15% | 31.2 (24 - 42, n=854) 5% |
Idle Average * | 38 | 30.4 20% | 35 8% | 28.5 25% | 28.4 25% | 32.4 (24.4 - 46.6, n=854) 15% |
Idle Maximum * | 45 | 33.4 26% | 36 20% | 30 33% | 32.9 27% | 34.6 (24.4 - 57, n=854) 23% |
Load Average * | 54 | 37.1 31% | 51 6% | 51.5 5% | 45 17% | 41.4 (28 - 59, n=855) 23% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 50 | 54.2 -8% | 47 6% | 55.3 -11% | 53.2 -6% | |
Load Maximum * | 55 | 56.4 -3% | 51 7% | 55.3 -1% | 53.2 3% | 48.7 (38.9 - 66.6, n=855) 11% |
* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 59 °C / 138 F, compared to the average of 39.9 °C / 104 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 42.7 °C / 109 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.6 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 48.6 °C / 119 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-11.2 °C / -20.2 F).
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile | MSI GE75 9SG i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | HP Omen 17-cb0020ng i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | Eurocom Nightsky RX17 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -14% | 2% | -5% | -5% | 4% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 59 | 48.8 17% | 47 20% | 45.2 23% | 48.6 18% | 46 (28 - 68.8, n=820) 22% |
Maximum Bottom * | 52 | 52 -0% | 54 -4% | 52 -0% | 46.8 10% | 49.9 (25.9 - 78, n=818) 4% |
Idle Upper Side * | 30 | 36.2 -21% | 32 -7% | 33 -10% | 35.4 -18% | 30.7 (21.6 - 46.8, n=771) -2% |
Idle Bottom * | 29 | 44.4 -53% | 30 -3% | 38 -31% | 38 -31% | 31.8 (21.1 - 50.3, n=769) -10% |
* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
MSI GE75 9SG audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Éteint/en veille | ![]() ![]() |
Au repos | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fortement sollicité |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Légende:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile | MSI GE75 9SG i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | HP Omen 17-cb0020ng i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | Eurocom Nightsky RX17 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 17% | -9% | 9% | 18% | 16% | |
Idle Minimum * | 16 | 13.9 13% | 26 -63% | 18.2 -14% | 18.6 -16% | 18.6 (1.9 - 113, n=814) -16% |
Idle Average * | 25 | 18.8 25% | 29 -16% | 23 8% | 22.6 10% | 24 (6 - 119, n=814) 4% |
Idle Maximum * | 35 | 23.1 34% | 38 -9% | 33.1 5% | 23 34% | 29.7 (8.3 - 122, n=814) 15% |
Load Average * | 177 | 112.3 37% | 106 40% | 124.8 29% | 93.4 47% | 104 (14.1 - 319, n=806) 41% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 227 | 231 -2% | 228 -0% | 180.8 20% | 186.4 18% | |
Load Maximum * | 280 | 291.5 -4% | 287 -3% | 263 6% | 233.6 17% | 178 (21.9 - 590, n=805) 36% |
* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, 66 Wh | MSI GE75 9SG i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 65 Wh | HP Omen 17-cb0020ng i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 70 Wh | Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 66 Wh | Eurocom Nightsky RX17 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 62 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Autonomie de la batterie | -17% | -44% | -33% | -49% | -24% | |
Reader / Idle | 602 | 250 -58% | 249 -59% | 251 -58% | 370 (39 - 1399, n=753) -39% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 356 | 294 -17% | 196 -45% | 236 -34% | 120 -66% | 275 (62 - 683, n=481) -23% |
Load | 89 | 63 -29% | 84 -6% | 69 -22% | 80.2 (18 - 243, n=723) -10% |
Points positifs
Points négatifs
Avec le Strix Scar 17 G732LXS, Asus propose un PC poratble haut de gamme ultra-puissant, qui souffre malheureusement des défauts typiques de cette catégorie de machines.
In addition to the heat generation, the noise level in 3D operation is also very high. On top of that, the graphics card has only earned its "Super" designation to a limited extent when comparing the performance with other RTX 2080 laptops (keyword TGP). Asus could also improve on the connectivity (no card reader, no Thunderbolt 3).
En plus de la chauffe, le niveau sonore en 3D est également très élevé. De plus, la carte graphique ne mérite pas tout à fait son qualificatif "Super", par rapport à d'autres PC portables avec RTX 2080 (TGP). Asus pourrait également améliorer la connectivité (pas de lecteur de carte ni de Thunderbolt 3).
Cela mis à part, nous avons vraiment apprécié ce 17 pouces. Le Scar 17 devance la plupart de ses concurrents grâce à son écran (300 Hz !), ses périphériques d'entrée, le son et l'autonomie. Cependant, le ratio performances / prix pourrait être meilleur avec un modèle moins cher équipé d'un Core i7-10875H et d'une GeForce RTX 2070 (Super), qui restera également sans doute moins chaud et moins bruyant.
L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS - 07/12/2020 v7
Florian Glaser