Test de l'Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G732LXS (i9-10980HK, RTX 2080 Super, FHD, 300 Hz) : tout-terrain

Name: Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
Brand: Asus

Surpuissant mais non sans défauts. Alors que la plupart des PC portables haut de gammes ont un design discret, le Strix Scar 17 cible visuellement les joueurs. La version testée, la G732LXS, peut tenir face aux PC équipés des meilleures cartes graphiques Nvidia. Asus a cependant choisi la version la moins puissante de la RTX 2080 Super.

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (traduit par Prévots), 08/25/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Comet Lake Geforce Gaming Laptop / Notebook

Exemplaire de test fourni par Asus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS (ROG Strix Scar 17 G732 Gamme)

Processeur

Intel Core i9-10980HK 8 x 2.4 - 5.3 GHz, Comet Lake-H

Carte graphique

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile - 8192 Mo, Processeur: 1380 MHz, Mémoire: 1750 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 442.53, Optimus

Mémoire

32768 Mo

, 2x 16 Go SO-DIMM DDR4-3200, double canal, tous les emplacements occupés

Écran

17.30 pouces 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPP, LQ173M1JW03 (SHP14DC), IPS, Full HD, brillant: non, 300 Hz

Carte mère

Intel HM470

Disque dur

2x Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 (RAID 0), 1024 Go

, 3 emplacements M.2 2280 (1 libre)

Carte son

Intel Comet Point PCH - cAVS

Connexions

3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Connectique audio: jack, Keystone

Réseau

Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5

Taille

Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 26.5 x 399 x 293

Batterie

66 Wh Lithium-Polymère

Système d'exploitation

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Appareil photo

Webcam: HD

Fonctionnalités additionnelles

Haut-parleurs: 2.0, Clavier: RVB par touche, Rétroéclairage du clavier: oui, adaptateur secteur 280 watt, Armoury Crate, 24 Mois Garantie

Poids

2.89 kg, Alimentation: 840 g

Prix

3400 EUR

Liens

Asus Page d'accueil
Asus Section dédiée aux ordinateurs portables

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

voir toutes les spécifications

Note	Date	Modèle	Poids	Épaisseur	Taille	Résolution
83 %	08/20	Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile	2.9 kg	26.5 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
86 %	05/19	MSI GE75 9SG i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	2.7 kg	27.5 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
85 %	08/19	HP Omen 17-cb0020ng i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	3.3 kg	27 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
85 %	07/19	Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	2.9 kg	26.2 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
87 %	07/19	Eurocom Nightsky RX17 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	2.9 kg	29.9 mm	17.30"	1920x1080

Size comparison

HP Omen 17-cb0020ng Eurocom Nightsky RX17 Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 MSI GE75 9SG ❌

A l'arrière : USB A 3.0, USB C 3.1 Gen2 (DisplayPort), HDMI, RJ45-LAN, entrée secteur.

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1150 MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Gaming (294 - 1645, n=163, last 2 years)	1062 MBit/s ∼92% -8%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	749 MBit/s ∼65% -35%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi	680 MBit/s ∼59% -41%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17 Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter	634 MBit/s ∼55% -45%
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi	620 MBit/s ∼54% -46%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1270 MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Gaming (140 - 1743, n=163, last 2 years)	1128 MBit/s ∼89% -11%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	675 MBit/s ∼53% -47%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi	661 MBit/s ∼52% -48%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17 Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter	606 MBit/s ∼48% -52%
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi	578 MBit/s ∼46% -54%


328 cd/m²	333 cd/m²	338 cd/m²
309 cd/m²	310 cd/m²	323 cd/m²
281 cd/m²	277 cd/m²	302 cd/m²

Homogénéité de la luminosité

LQ173M1JW03 (SHP14DC)

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 338 cd/m² Moyenne: 311.2 cd/m² Minimum: 16 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 82 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 310 cd/m²
Contraste: 756:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.41 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6, calibrated: 1.13
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
94% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
72% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
71.57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.99% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.98% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.149

Download Profil ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS LQ173M1JW03 (SHP14DC), IPS, 1920x1080	MSI GE75 9SG Chi Mei N173HCE-G33, AHVA, 1920x1080	HP Omen 17-cb0020ng CMN175D, IPS, 1920x1080	Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 AU Optronics AUO409D, IPS, 1920x1080	Eurocom Nightsky RX17 BOE NV173FHM-N44, IPS, 1920x1080
Display		-10%	-7%	-13%	-6%
Display P3 Coverage	70.98	61.47 -13%	63.73 -10%	61.89 -13%	66.05 -7%
sRGB Coverage	98.99	91.96 -7%	96.01 -3%	86.28 -13%	93.12 -6%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	71.57	63.47 -11%	65.84 -8%	62.86 -12%	67.15 -6%
Response Times		-2%	-118%	-31%	-104%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	5.8 (2.4, 3.4)	7.2 (3.8, 3.4) -24%	17.6 (8.4, 9.2) -203%	7.2 (3.6, 3.6) -24%	16.4 (8.4, 8) -183%
Response Time Black / White *	8.4 (4.4, 4)	6.6 (3.2, 3.4) 21%	11.2 (6, 5.2) -33%	11.6 (6.4, 5.2) -38%	10.4 (6, 4.4) -24%
PWM Frequency		26040 (10)	25510 (44)		990.1 (99)
Screen		24%	26%	-26%	-9%
Brightness middle	310	400.7 29%	360 16%	297.4 -4%	298.4 -4%
Brightness	311	372 20%	342 10%	306 -2%	287 -8%
Brightness Distribution	82	89 9%	91 11%	80 -2%	90 10%
Black Level *	0.41	0.34 17%	0.26 37%	0.31 24%	0.3 27%
Contrast	756	1179 56%	1385 83%	959 27%	995 32%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	2.41	1.33 45%	1.91 21%	4.08 -69%	3.58 -49%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	8.59	3.51 59%	4.08 53%	6.88 20%	6.29 27%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *	1.13	1.39 -23%	0.78 31%	4 -254%	2.82 -150%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	4.3	1.3 70%	2.72 37%	4 7%	3.1 28%
Gamma	2.149 ^102%	2.24 ^98%	2.37 ^93%	2.259 ^97%	2.24 ^98%
CCT	7059 ^92%	6735 ^97%	6692 ^97%	7205 ^90%	7064 ^92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	72	58.2 -19%	60 -17%	56 -22%	60.2 -16%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	94	92.1 -2%	96 2%	86 -9%	92.7 -1%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)		4% / 14%	-33% / 2%	-23% / -24%	-40% / -21%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Temps de réponse de l'écran

ℹ

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.

↔ Temps de réponse noir à blanc
8.4 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↗ 4.4 ms hausse
8.4 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↘ 4 ms chute
L'écran montre de faibles temps de réponse, un bon écran pour jouer. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 10 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (24 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
↔ Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
5.8 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↗ 2.4 ms hausse
5.8 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↘ 3.4 ms chute
L'écran montre de très faibles temps de réponse, parfait pour le jeu. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (38.1 ms) de tous les appareils testés.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

ℹ

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 52 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 14793 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 2500000) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK, Intel Core i9-10980HK: Ø1587 (1552.73-1737.47)

MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H, Intel Core i9-9880H: Ø1619 (1602.44-1728.31)

HP Omen 17-cb0020ng Intel Core i9-9880H, Intel Core i9-9880H: Ø1291 (1278.24-1450)

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK	203 Points ∼100%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng Intel Core i9-9880H	197 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Gaming (108 - 254, n=199, last 2 years)	196 Points ∼97% -3%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	189 Points ∼93% -7%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17 Intel Core i7-9750H	174 Points ∼86% -14%
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 Intel Core i7-9750H	174 Points ∼86% -14%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK	1737 (1552.73^min - 1737.47^max) Points ∼100%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	1721 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Gaming (536 - 2804, n=211, last 2 years)	1498 Points ∼86% -14%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng Intel Core i9-9880H	1450 Points ∼83% -17%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17 Intel Core i7-9750H	1306 Points ∼75% -25%
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 Intel Core i7-9750H	1239 Points ∼71% -29%

Blender 2.79 - BMW27 CPU
Average of class Gaming (179 - 633, n=153, last 2 years)	330 Seconds * ∼100% -15%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	293 Seconds * ∼89% -2%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK	286 Seconds * ∼87%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK	5336 MIPS ∼100%
Average of class Gaming (2945 - 6174, n=154, last 2 years)	5188 MIPS ∼97% -3%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	4924 MIPS ∼92% -8%
7z b 4
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	46591 MIPS ∼100% +1%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK	45938 MIPS ∼99%
Average of class Gaming (15146 - 75612, n=154, last 2 years)	43260 MIPS ∼93% -6%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK	489 Points ∼100%
Average of class Gaming (312 - 634, n=188, last 2 years)	484 Points ∼99% -1%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng Intel Core i9-9880H	467 Points ∼96% -4%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	441 Points ∼90% -10%
CPU (Multi Core)
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK	3883 Points ∼100%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	3712 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Gaming (1397 - 6321, n=189, last 2 years)	3504 Points ∼90% -10%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng Intel Core i9-9880H	2953 Points ∼76% -24%

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK	1302 Points ∼100%
Average of class Gaming (703 - 1777, n=149, last 2 years)	1295 Points ∼99% -1%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK	8666 Points ∼100%
Average of class Gaming (2783 - 11393, n=149, last 2 years)	7143 Points ∼82% -18%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK	12.5 fps ∼100%
Average of class Gaming (4.4 - 19.8, n=153, last 2 years)	11.9 fps ∼95% -5%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	11.865 fps ∼95% -5%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Average of class Gaming (23.9 - 98.2, n=141, last 2 years)	54 s * ∼100% -4%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK	51.9 s * ∼96%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Average of class Gaming (0.4907 - 1.088, n=145, last 2 years)	0.587 sec * ∼100% -1%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK	0.581 sec * ∼99%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1737 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

166 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

203 Points

Aide

... en comparaison

PCMark 10 - Score
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)	6558 Points ∼100% +18%
MSI GE75 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	6306 Points ∼96% +13%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)	5982 Points ∼91% +8%
Average of class Gaming (3952 - 7884, n=181, last 2 years)	5936 Points ∼91% +7%
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	5834 Points ∼89% +5%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, 2x Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 (RAID 0)	5556 Points ∼85%

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, 2x Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 (RAID 0)	5066.3 μs * ∼100%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

	Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS 2x Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 (RAID 0)	MSI GE75 9SG Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	HP Omen 17-cb0020ng 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)	Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	Eurocom Nightsky RX17 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		-7%	11%	-4%	31%
Write 4K	125.8	116.1 -8%	103.8 -17%	130.1 3%	133 6%
Read 4K	52.86	44.98 -15%	41.67 -21%	56.02 6%	61.58 16%
Write Seq	1795	2370 32%	2639 47%		2935 64%
Read Seq	2315	1465 -37%	2702 17%		3118 35%
Write 4K Q32T1	407.1	337.5 -17%	487.3 20%	465.7 14%	571.3 40%
Read 4K Q32T1	411.9	453.6 10%	555.1 35%	546.8 33%	654.2 59%
Write Seq Q32T1	2844	2399 -16%	2967 4%	1766 -38%	3296 16%
Read Seq Q32T1	3130	3087 -1%	3102 -1%	1921.7 -39%	3560 14%

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

2x Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 (RAID 0)

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3130 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2844 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 411.9 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 407.1 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 2315 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 1795 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 52.86 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 125.8 MB/s

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

: Ø2797 (2508.82-2829.69)

3DMark 06 Standard		41873 points
3DMark Vantage P Result		69838 points
3DMark 11 Performance		27065 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		49644 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		20902 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		9629 points
Aide

... en comparaison

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GE75 9SG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	24623 Points ∼100% +1%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile	24416 Points ∼99%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	22820 Points ∼93% -7%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	21138 Points ∼86% -13%
Average of class Gaming (1360 - 34993, n=201, last 2 years)	19446 Points ∼79% -20%
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	19230 Points ∼78% -21%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI GE75 9SG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	9754 Points ∼100% +1%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile	9638 Points ∼99%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	9480 Points ∼97% -2%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	8000 Points ∼82% -17%
Average of class Gaming (429 - 13210, n=200, last 2 years)	7453 Points ∼76% -23%
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	7294 Points ∼75% -24%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile	5903 Points ∼100%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	5582 Points ∼95% -5%
MSI GE75 9SG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	5538 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Gaming (1097 - 8032, n=114, last 2 years)	4839 Points ∼82% -18%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	4323 Points ∼73% -27%

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GE75 9SG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	34050 Points ∼100% 0%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile	34021 Points ∼100%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	31826 Points ∼93% -6%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	26752 Points ∼79% -21%
Average of class Gaming (1925 - 43077, n=192, last 2 years)	25603 Points ∼75% -25%
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	24465 Points ∼72% -28%

Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, 2x Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 (RAID 0): Ø91.8 (79-97)

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
MSI GE75 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H	95.3 fps ∼100% +2%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK	93.4 (78^min) fps ∼98%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H	91.7 (76^min) fps ∼96% -2%
Average of class Gaming (24.3 - 123, n=194, last 2 years)	75 fps ∼79% -20%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H	73.8 fps ∼77% -21%
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H	64 fps ∼67% -31%

	Bas	Moyen	Élevé	Ultra	QHD	4K
GTA V (2015)	185	178	164	92.8			fps
The Witcher 3 (2015)		280	178	93.4		66.4	fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	168	154	148	134			fps
Fortnite (2018)		178	171	136	104	52	fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)		124	95.7			42	fps
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018)		144	107	75.3	56.1	33.1	fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	123	105	88.4				fps
Monster Hunter World (2018)		131	119	102	69.1	36	fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)		136	127	121	84	45	fps
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018)		98	85	62	57	38	fps
Hitman 2 (2018)		104	87.8	80	77.7	48.4	fps
Battlefield V (2018)		169	153	142	115	68.7	fps
Darksiders III (2018)		168	143	132	97.2	50.5	fps
Just Cause 4 (2018)		157	120	113	81.2	46	fps
Apex Legends (2019)		144	144	144	131	75.4	fps
Far Cry New Dawn (2019)		116	113	100	90	55	fps
Metro Exodus (2019)		116	90.2	71	55.4	34.9	fps
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019)		178	158	91.6	74.1		fps
The Division 2 (2019)		147	131	102	69	36	fps
Anno 1800 (2019)		122	91.7	50.6	45.3	27.1	fps
Rage 2 (2019)		148	127	127	81.9	40.3	fps
F1 2019 (2019)		224	174	167	130	80	fps
Control (2019)		113	87.6		58.9	29.8	fps
Borderlands 3 (2019)		131	98	88	64.6	35.2	fps
FIFA 20 (2019)		281	267	262	258	227	fps
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019)		109	99	74	57	34	fps
GRID 2019 (2019)		164	120	88.7	72.5	48.8	fps
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019)		145	136	115	83.6	48.3	fps
Need for Speed Heat (2019)		104	91	79.4	75.3	51.3	fps
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019)		121	117	107	86.4	49	fps
Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019)		117	79.8	52.9	42.5	27.6	fps
Escape from Tarkov (2020)		121	121	121	102	49.5	fps
Hunt Showdown (2020)		151	120		83.1	38.4	fps
Doom Eternal (2020)		216	193	191	147	80.8	fps
Gears Tactics (2020)		226	144	106	70.3	38.4	fps
F1 2020 (2020)		235	175	146	119	72	fps

Degré de la nuisance sonore

Au repos		33 / 38 / 45 dB(A)
Fortement sollicité		54 / 55 dB(A)

	30 dB silencieux 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) bruyant
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (à 15 cm de distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A)

	Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile	MSI GE75 9SG i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	HP Omen 17-cb0020ng i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	Eurocom Nightsky RX17 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	Average of class Gaming
Noise		9%	3%	8%	10%	11%
off / environment *	25	28.2 -13%	30 -20%	28.2 -13%	28 -12%	27.1 (23 - 31, n=170, last 2 years) -8%
Idle Minimum *	33	30.4 8%	34 -3%	28.2 15%	28 15%	29 (23 - 42, n=170, last 2 years) 12%
Idle Average *	38	30.4 20%	35 8%	28.5 25%	28.4 25%	30.6 (23 - 44, n=170, last 2 years) 19%
Idle Maximum *	45	33.4 26%	36 20%	30 33%	32.9 27%	34.2 (23 - 57, n=170, last 2 years) 24%
Load Average *	54	37.1 31%	51 6%	51.5 5%	45 17%	45 (27.1 - 63, n=170, last 2 years) 17%
Witcher 3 ultra *	50	54.2 -8%	47 6%	55.3 -11%	53.2 -6%
Load Maximum *	55	56.4 -3%	51 7%	55.3 -1%	53.2 3%	53 (40.2 - 66.6, n=170, last 2 years) 4%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

A pleine charge

Au repos/à faible charge

Witcher 3


51 °C	47 °C	59 °C
41 °C	45 °C	49 °C
30 °C	37 °C	33 °C

Maximum: 59 °C
Moyenne: 43.6 °C


52 °C	50 °C	50 °C
49 °C	49 °C	44 °C
31 °C	30 °C	35 °C

Maximum: 52 °C
Moyenne: 43.3 °C

Alimentation (valeur maximale) 56 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 24 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

A pleine charge

Au repos/à faible charge

Witcher 3


30 °C	30 °C	29 °C
30 °C	30 °C	29 °C
26 °C	27 °C	26 °C

Maximum: 30 °C
Moyenne: 28.6 °C


29 °C	28 °C	29 °C
28 °C	29 °C	29 °C
26 °C	26 °C	26 °C

Maximum: 29 °C
Moyenne: 27.8 °C

Alimentation (valeur maximale) 39 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 24 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

A pleine charge

Au repos/à faible charge

Witcher 3


57 °C	59 °C	56 °C
51 °C	52 °C	46 °C
40 °C	39 °C	37 °C

Maximum: 59 °C
Moyenne: 48.6 °C


52 °C	54 °C	53 °C
51 °C	52 °C	51 °C
45 °C	46 °C	46 °C

Maximum: 54 °C
Moyenne: 50 °C

Alimentation (valeur maximale) 57 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 24 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.6 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 59 °C / 138 F, compared to the average of 40 °C / 104 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 42.9 °C / 109 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.6 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.6 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 48.6 °C / 119 F, compared to the device average of 33.6 °C / 92 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-11.1 °C / -20 F).

	Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile	MSI GE75 9SG i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	HP Omen 17-cb0020ng i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	Eurocom Nightsky RX17 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	Average of class Gaming
Heat		-14%	2%	-5%	-5%	0%
Maximum Upper Side *	59	48.8 17%	47 20%	45.2 23%	48.6 18%	47.6 (33.4 - 62, n=171, last 2 years) 19%
Maximum Bottom *	52	52 -0%	54 -4%	52 -0%	46.8 10%	52.4 (32.5 - 69, n=171, last 2 years) -1%
Idle Upper Side *	30	36.2 -21%	32 -7%	33 -10%	35.4 -18%	31.1 (23 - 46, n=171, last 2 years) -4%
Idle Bottom *	29	44.4 -53%	30 -3%	38 -31%	38 -31%	32.9 (24 - 46, n=171, last 2 years) -13%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

MSI GE75 9SG audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consommation énergétique

Éteint/en veille	0.1 / 0.1 Watts
Au repos	16 / 25 / 35 Watts
Fortement sollicité	177 / 280 Watts


Légende: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile	MSI GE75 9SG i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	HP Omen 17-cb0020ng i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	Eurocom Nightsky RX17 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		17%	-9%	9%	18%	23%
Idle Minimum *	16	13.9 13%	26 -63%	18.2 -14%	18.6 -16%	14.4 (1.9 - 62, n=170, last 2 years) 10%
Idle Average *	25	18.8 25%	29 -16%	23 8%	22.6 10%	19.3 (6 - 64, n=170, last 2 years) 23%
Idle Maximum *	35	23.1 34%	38 -9%	33.1 5%	23 34%	28 (8.7 - 69.6, n=170, last 2 years) 20%
Load Average *	177	112.3 37%	106 40%	124.8 29%	93.4 47%	106 (55.1 - 183, n=171, last 2 years) 40%
Witcher 3 ultra *	227	231 -2%	228 -0%	180.8 20%	186.4 18%
Load Maximum *	280	291.5 -4%	287 -3%	263 6%	233.6 17%	217 (124 - 512, n=171, last 2 years) 22%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie

Au repos (module WiFi éteint, luminosité au minimum)		10h 02min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		5h 56min
Fortement sollicité (luminosité au maximum)		1h 29min

	Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, 66 Wh	MSI GE75 9SG i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 65 Wh	HP Omen 17-cb0020ng i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 70 Wh	Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 66 Wh	Eurocom Nightsky RX17 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 62 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Autonomie de la batterie		-17%	-44%	-33%	-49%	-4%
Reader / Idle	602		250 -58%	249 -59%	251 -58%	563 (73 - 1399, n=131, last 2 years) -6%
WiFi v1.3	356	294 -17%	196 -45%	236 -34%	120 -66%	336 (62 - 710, n=175, last 2 years) -6%
Load	89		63 -29%	84 -6%	69 -22%	89.1 (30 - 243, n=143, last 2 years) 0%

Points positifs

+ périphériques d'entrée

+ son

+ écran 300 Hz

Points négatifs

- connectivité

- niveau sonore en cas de sollicitations

- absence de webcam

En test : le ROG Strix Scar 17 G732LXS. Modèle de test fourni par Asus Allemagne.

Avec le Strix Scar 17 G732LXS, Asus propose un PC poratble haut de gamme ultra-puissant, qui souffre malheureusement des défauts typiques de cette catégorie de machines.

In addition to the heat generation, the noise level in 3D operation is also very high. On top of that, the graphics card has only earned its "Super" designation to a limited extent when comparing the performance with other RTX 2080 laptops (keyword TGP). Asus could also improve on the connectivity (no card reader, no Thunderbolt 3).

En plus de la chauffe, le niveau sonore en 3D est également très élevé. De plus, la carte graphique ne mérite pas tout à fait son qualificatif "Super", par rapport à d'autres PC portables avec RTX 2080 (TGP). Asus pourrait également améliorer la connectivité (pas de lecteur de carte ni de Thunderbolt 3).

Cela mis à part, nous avons vraiment apprécié ce 17 pouces. Le Scar 17 devance la plupart de ses concurrents grâce à son écran (300 Hz !), ses périphériques d'entrée, le son et l'autonomie. Cependant, le ratio performances / prix pourrait être meilleur avec un modèle moins cher équipé d'un Core i7-10875H et d'une GeForce RTX 2070 (Super), qui restera également sans doute moins chaud et moins bruyant.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS - 2020-07-12 07/12/2020 v7
Florian Glaser

Châssis

81 / 98 → 83%

Clavier

87%

Dispositif de pointage

88%

Connectivité

62 / 80 → 78%

Poids

57 / 10-66 → 84%