Notebookcheck

Test du HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng (i7-1065G7, MX250, FHD, 60 Hz) : PC portable élégant polyvalent à l'écran lumineux

Ventilateur trop présent. Avec le Pavilion 14-ce3040ng, HP propose un portable multimédia à 1 000 € basé sur la toute nouvelle architecture Ice Lake d’Intel. Comme ce test va le montrer, ce 14 pouces possède plusieurs défauts facilement corrigeables.
Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (traduit par Prévots),
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Processeur
Intel Core i7-1065G7 4 x 1.3 - 3.9 GHz, Ice Lake U
Carte graphique
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 - 4096 Mo, Processeur: 1519 MHz, Mémoire: 1500 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 441.87, Optimus
Mémoire
16384 Mo 
, SO-DIMM DDR4-3200, mono canal
Écran
14.00 pouces 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPP, AUO543D, IPS, Full HD, 60 Hz, brillant: non
Carte mère
Intel 495 (Ice Lake-U PCH-LP Premium)
Disque dur
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02, 1024 Go 
, SSD NVMe M.2
Carte son
Intel Ice Point-LP PCH - cAVS
Connexions
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 Encoche de Sécurité Kensington, Connectique audio: jack 3,5 mm, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: SD, SDHC, SDXC
Réseau
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 18 x 327 x 226
Batterie
41 Wh Lithium-Ion, 3 cellules
Système d'exploitation
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Appareil photo
Webcam: HD
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: 2.0, Clavier: chiclet, Rétroéclairage du clavier: oui, adaptateur secteur 65 Watt, guide de démarrage rapide, 24 Mois Garantie
Poids
1.55 kg, Alimentation: 222 g
Prix
1000 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Note
Date
Modèle
Poids
Épaisseur
Taille
Résolution
Best Price
78 %
02/20
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
i7-1065G7, GeForce MX250
1.6 kg18 mm14.00"1920x1080
85 %
07/19
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
i5-8265U, GeForce MX250
1.4 kg15.9 mm14.00"1920x1080
84 %
04/19
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
i7-8565U, GeForce MX250
1.8 kg17.95 mm15.60"1920x1080
83 %
08/19
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
i7-8565U, GeForce MX250
1.8 kg18 mm15.60"1920x1080

Appareils du comparatif

363.4 mm 243.5 mm 17.95 mm 1.8 kg357.2 mm 230.3 mm 18 mm 1.8 kg327 mm 226 mm 18 mm 1.6 kg323 mm 227 mm 15.9 mm 1.4 kg
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
82.9 MB/s ∼100% +159%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
69.1 MB/s ∼83% +116%
Average of class Multimedia
  (11.2 - 222, n=211)
62.2 MB/s ∼75% +94%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro UHS-II)
33.3 MB/s ∼40% +4%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
32 MB/s ∼39%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
89.9 MB/s ∼100% +172%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
81.8 MB/s ∼91% +148%
Average of class Multimedia
  (10.2 - 253, n=207)
77.1 MB/s ∼86% +134%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro UHS-II)
35.6 MB/s ∼40% +8%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
33 MB/s ∼37%
359
cd/m²
378
cd/m²
359
cd/m²
375
cd/m²
395
cd/m²
376
cd/m²
378
cd/m²
382
cd/m²
377
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
AUO543D
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 395 cd/m² Moyenne: 375.4 cd/m² Minimum: 28 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 91 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 395 cd/m²
Contraste: 1519:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.92 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7, calibrated: 0.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.69 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
98% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 63% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.78
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
AUO543D, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
NV140FHM-N48, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
BOE NV156FHM-N48, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
LG Philips LP156WFC-SPD1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Response Times
14%
8%
39%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
60.8 (29.2, 31.6)
39.6 (21.6, 18)
35%
45 (23, 22)
26%
24.8 (12.8, 12)
59%
Response Time Black / White *
29.6 (13.2, 16.4)
32 (18, 14)
-8%
33 (18, 15)
-11%
24 (14, 10)
19%
PWM Frequency
352.1 (99)
250 (90)
Screen
-55%
-50%
-69%
Brightness middle
395
316
-20%
278
-30%
262.3
-34%
Brightness
375
301
-20%
271
-28%
250
-33%
Brightness Distribution
91
88
-3%
89
-2%
89
-2%
Black Level *
0.26
0.28
-8%
0.26
-0%
0.43
-65%
Contrast
1519
1129
-26%
1069
-30%
610
-60%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.92
5.3
10%
4.73
20%
5.81
2%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.79
18.5
-89%
8.38
14%
14.7
-50%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
0.91
4.8
-427%
5.17
-468%
5.36
-489%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.69
2.4
64%
2.59
61%
2.8
58%
Gamma
2.78 79%
2.05 107%
2.38 92%
2.15 102%
CCT
7596 86%
6644 98%
6160 106%
7016 93%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
63
37.6
-40%
36
-43%
35.2
-44%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
98
58.3
-41%
58
-41%
55.6
-43%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
-21% / -44%
-21% / -41%
-15% / -52%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
29.6 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 13.2 ms hausse
↘ 16.4 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences relativement élevées, insuffisant pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 71 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (24.3 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
60.8 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 29.2 ms hausse
↘ 31.6 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 96 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (38.6 ms) de tous les appareils testés.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9581 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

HP Pavilion 14 - CPU-Z.
HP Pavilion 14 - CPU-Z.
HP Pavilion 14 - CPU-Z.
HP Pavilion 14 - CPU-Z.
HP Pavilion 14 - CPU-Z.
HP Pavilion 14 - HWiNFO.
HP Pavilion 14 - GPU-Z.
HP Pavilion 14 - AS SSD Benchmark.
HP Pavilion 14 - CrystalDiskMark.
HP Pavilion 14 - LatencyMon.
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700Tooltip
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Core i7-1065G7: Ø625 (592.25-691)
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel Core i5-8265U: Ø548 (543.22-613.69)
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i7-8565U: Ø470 (467.49-492.88)
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i7-8565U: Ø502 (489.9-680.49)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
190 Points ∼100%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
Intel Core i7-8565U
168 Points ∼88% -12%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
Intel Core i7-8565U
165 Points ∼87% -13%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
Intel Core i5-8265U
152 Points ∼80% -20%
Average of class Multimedia
  (36 - 214, n=416)
134 Points ∼71% -29%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
691 Points ∼100%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
Intel Core i7-8565U
680 Points ∼98% -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
Intel Core i5-8265U
600 (548.41min - 619.74max) Points ∼87% -13%
Average of class Multimedia
  (72.4 - 1815, n=436)
537 Points ∼78% -22%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
Intel Core i7-8565U
493 Points ∼71% -29%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
474 Points ∼100%
Average of class Multimedia
  (62.6 - 543, n=60)
413 Points ∼87% -13%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
Intel Core i5-8265U
401 Points ∼85% -15%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
Intel Core i7-8565U
390 Points ∼82% -18%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Multimedia
  (148 - 4094, n=61)
1923 Points ∼100% +25%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
1543 Points ∼80%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
Intel Core i5-8265U
1367 Points ∼71% -11%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
Intel Core i7-8565U
1035 Points ∼54% -33%
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
691 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
190 Points
Aide
PCMark 10 - Score
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
GeForce MX250, i7-1065G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
4289 Points ∼100%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
4236 Points ∼99% -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
GeForce MX250, i5-8265U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4192 Points ∼98% -2%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
4148 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1144 - 6514, n=145)
4137 Points ∼96% -4%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-22%
-39%
-36%
Write 4K
181.6
157.6
-13%
130.1
-28%
149.9
-17%
Read 4K
57.41
46.39
-19%
27.64
-52%
46.13
-20%
Write Seq
1982
1214
-39%
1438
-27%
969.9
-51%
Read Seq
1899
1295
-32%
1319
-31%
1085
-43%
Write 4K Q32T1
509.4
370.7
-27%
323.3
-37%
460.8
-10%
Read 4K Q32T1
544.7
461.1
-15%
359.9
-34%
410.3
-25%
Write Seq Q32T1
3072
1887.9
-39%
1454
-53%
662.4
-78%
Read Seq Q32T1
3281
3540.2
8%
1740
-47%
1728
-47%
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3281 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3072 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 544.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 509.4 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1899 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1982 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 57.41 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 181.6 MB/s
3DMark 11 Performance
4850 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
1223 points
Aide
05101520Tooltip
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng GeForce MX250, i7-1065G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02: Ø11.2 (7-15)
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Multimedia
  (142 - 7372, n=99)
1705 Points ∼100% +54%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
1111 Points ∼65% +1%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
1105 Points ∼65%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
1090 Points ∼64% -1%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
3720 Points ∼100% +4%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
3705 Points ∼100% +3%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
3616 Points ∼97% +1%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
3580 Points ∼96%
Average of class Multimedia
  (337 - 19655, n=456)
3188 Points ∼86% -11%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
4942 Points ∼100% +7%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
4756 Points ∼96% +3%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
4633 Points ∼94% 0%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
4614 Points ∼93%
Average of class Multimedia
  (352 - 26292, n=679)
3307 Points ∼67% -28%
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Multimedia
  (3.8 - 138, n=139)
33.3 fps ∼100% +77%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
GeForce MX250, i7-8565U
20.4 fps ∼61% +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
GeForce MX250, i5-8265U
19.8 fps ∼59% +5%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
GeForce MX250, i7-8565U
19.1 fps ∼57% +2%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
GeForce MX250, i7-1065G7
18.8 (15min) fps ∼56%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.2 - 210, n=132)
50.7 fps ∼100% +51%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
GeForce MX250, i7-8565U
37.9 fps ∼75% +13%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
GeForce MX250, i7-8565U
36.8 fps ∼73% +10%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
GeForce MX250, i5-8265U
34.5 fps ∼68% +3%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
GeForce MX250, i7-1065G7
33.5 (26min) fps ∼66%
Bas Moyen Élevé Ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 56.4 33.5 18.8 10.9 fps
Resident Evil 7 (2017) 118 53.9 32.1 27 fps
Prey (2017) 108 46.2 36.4 30.1 fps
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) 64 27 19 15 fps
ELEX (2017) 53.9 25.4 20.6 15.6 fps
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) 79.1 25.4 21.8 18.7 fps
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) 50.7 21.9 18.7 12.7 fps
The Crew 2 (2018) 43.9 20.2 19.5 16.5 fps
Control (2019) 41 14 10.1 fps
Borderlands 3 (2019) 52.9 20.7 13.4 10.2 fps
FIFA 20 (2019) 120 82.4 76.8 62.5 fps
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) 36 19 17 12 fps
GRID 2019 (2019) 65.2 25.2 20.3 11.8 fps
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019) 41.7 23.3 19.4 15.9 fps
Need for Speed Heat (2019) 41.1 20.2 18.4 15.3 fps
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) 29.4 22.5 18.1 fps
Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019) 20.9 15.2 9.8 6.2 fps
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.234.534.132.632.733.62537.543.643.735.836.837.43130.133.53330.129.231.34034.335.432.435.132.835.35039.1323338.627.940.66338.538.140.134.529.438.18035.633.7283427.23510040.228.125.427.725.240.812530.829.126.527.726.83216031.53329.734.22832.220028.727.225.427.623.828.625029.925.124.526.521.730.731528.825.722.322.920.428.640033.425.823.121.119.333.55003325.322.320.719.132.463033.12622.620.817.533.78003426.523.51816.934.110003527.724.417.717.335.2125036.929.326.219.418.436.8160038.930.626.918.217.138.9200039.531.728.617.816.839.7250040.333271816.840.231504128.122.917.916.940.54000392420.717.91739500033.822.419.518.217.333.763003220.418.417.81732800027.11918.318.116.727.11000024.518.618.21816.724.11250023.218.618.218.116.722.51600022.51918.31816.620SPL49.340.336.531.529.749.3N6.53.22.41.71.36.5median 33.1median 26median 23.1median 18.2median 17.3median 33.5Delta4.23.13.232.14.4hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng

Degré de la nuisance sonore

Au repos
31 / 36 / 41 dB(A)
Fortement sollicité
49 / 49 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencieux
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
bruyant
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (à 15 cm de distance)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
i7-1065G7, GeForce MX250
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
i5-8265U, GeForce MX250
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
i7-8565U, GeForce MX250
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
i7-8565U, GeForce MX250
Average of class Multimedia
 
Noise
20%
13%
16%
12%
off / environment *
30
29.3
2%
29.9
-0%
28
7%
30.8 (22 - 304, n=221)
-3%
Idle Minimum *
31
29.3
5%
29.9
4%
28
10%
31.1 (24.6 - 40.1, n=1022)
-0%
Idle Average *
36
29.3
19%
29.9
17%
28
22%
31.9 (24.6 - 42.2, n=1024)
11%
Idle Maximum *
41
29.3
29%
29.9
27%
30
27%
32.5 (24.6 - 47, n=1024)
21%
Load Average *
49
34.4
30%
41.7
15%
41.4
16%
36.5 (28 - 51.8, n=1024)
26%
Witcher 3 ultra *
47
34.4
27%
41.5
12%
Load Maximum *
49
34.9
29%
41.7
15%
41.5
15%
41.9 (32.5 - 62.7, n=1024)
14%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

 42 °C47 °C46 °C 
 32 °C45 °C46 °C 
 27 °C31 °C32 °C 
Maximum: 47 °C
Moyenne: 38.7 °C
46 °C47 °C38 °C
42 °C39 °C29 °C
28 °C26 °C25 °C
Maximum: 47 °C
Moyenne: 35.6 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  45 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 31 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 36.6 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 38.9 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 31 °C / 88 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 31 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29 °C / 84.2 F (-3 °C / -5.4 F).
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
i7-1065G7, GeForce MX250
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
i5-8265U, GeForce MX250
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
i7-8565U, GeForce MX250
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
i7-8565U, GeForce MX250
Average of class Multimedia
 
Heat
5%
-15%
-6%
-6%
Maximum Upper Side *
47
41.8
11%
53.7
-14%
45.4
3%
41.8 (27.2 - 71, n=980)
11%
Maximum Bottom *
47
43.3
8%
56
-19%
40.8
13%
45.1 (28.5 - 82, n=980)
4%
Idle Upper Side *
25
25.1
-0%
28.4
-14%
29.6
-18%
29.6 (21.1 - 40.2, n=831)
-18%
Idle Bottom *
26
25.4
2%
28.9
-11%
31.2
-20%
30.9 (21.5 - 44.4, n=831)
-19%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.730.82536.835.53129.229.74032.836.65027.939.56329.437.38027.235.610025.232.512526.832.51602834.620023.842.725021.75631520.461.440019.367.350019.170.163017.572.580016.967.7100017.369.1125018.472.4160017.176.7200016.873.5250016.872315016.973.240001775.7500017.375.163001773800016.766.61000016.770.11250016.767.91600016.655.3SPL29.785N1.363.7median 17.3median 69.1Delta2.19.432.63028.626.626.826.527.828.124.32823.225.223.52523.232.22135.120.641.121.150.720.653.120.453.620.558.919.861.419.560.318.85718.462.117.561.217.362.516.85716.257.115.956.215.66015.655.115.449.215.241.915.243.61538.714.742.329.370.51.226.6median 17.5median 55.12.48.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Pavilion 14-ce3040ngLenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.2 / 0.7 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 4 / 7 / 10 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 62 / 64 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
i7-1065G7, GeForce MX250
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
i5-8265U, GeForce MX250
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
i7-8565U, GeForce MX250
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
i7-8565U, GeForce MX250
Average of class Multimedia
 
Power Consumption
12%
1%
-25%
-84%
Idle Minimum *
4
2.74
31%
4.4
-10%
6
-50%
11.3 (2.1 - 101, n=978)
-183%
Idle Average *
7
5.64
19%
6.9
1%
10.3
-47%
15.8 (3 - 122, n=978)
-126%
Idle Maximum *
10
8.4
16%
9.9
1%
10.5
-5%
19.3 (4.6 - 181, n=978)
-93%
Load Average *
62
61.3
1%
55
11%
69.1
-11%
60.2 (18.5 - 164, n=957)
3%
Witcher 3 ultra *
58
49.2
15%
57.8
-0%
Load Maximum *
64
69.4
-8%
63.4
1%
88
-38%
78.6 (20.1 - 329, n=962)
-23%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
Au repos (module WiFi éteint, luminosité au minimum)
11h 34min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
6h 08min
Fortement sollicité (luminosité au maximum)
1h 9min
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
i7-1065G7, GeForce MX250, 41 Wh
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
i5-8265U, GeForce MX250, 48 Wh
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, 48 Wh
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, 42 Wh
Average of class Multimedia
 
Autonomie de la batterie
49%
31%
1%
-3%
Reader / Idle
694
1281
85%
773
11%
655
-6%
428 (73 - 2085, n=918)
-38%
WiFi v1.3
368
505
37%
414
13%
306
-17%
380 (96 - 942, n=296)
3%
Load
69
87
26%
117
70%
86
25%
86.1 (32 - 238, n=925)
25%
H.264
495
388
390 (114 - 1107, n=117)

Points positifs

+ haute qualité (matériaux, construction)
+ contraste et luminosité de l'écran
+ compact
+ léger
+ élégant

Points négatifs

- connectivité
- clavier
- fuites de luminosité
- bruit des ventilateurs
En test : le HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par notebooksbilliger.de.
En test : le HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par notebooksbilliger.de.

Le Pavilion 14-ce3040ng laisse au premier abord une très bonne impression.

Le design élégant, partiellement fait d’aluminium, nous a impressionnés, permettant en outre à l’appareil d’être léger et compact. Cela rend l’appareil particulièrement adapté aux nomades.

Son écran lumineux et bien contrasté est un autre argument, et permet au Pavilion de se démarquer de la concurrence. Mais les périphériques d’entrée, la connectivité, et l’autonomie, ne sont que dans la moyenne.

HP a fait une grosse erreur dans la gestion du ventilateur. Celui-ci atteint 40 dB(A) au ralenti, et presque 50 en cas de sollicitations. De ce fait, nous conseillons d’aller voir ailleurs, à moins que le bruit des ventilateurs ne vous gêne pas.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng - 05/14/2020 v7
Florian Glaser

Châssis
75 / 98 → 77%
Clavier
73%
Dispositif de pointage
81%
Connectivité
52 / 80 → 65%
Poids
68 / 20-72 → 93%
Autonomie
70 / 95 → 73%
Écran
84%
Performances en jeu
62 / 90 → 69%
Performances dans les applications
90 / 90 → 100%
Chauffe
87%
Nuisance sonore
64 / 95 → 67%
Audio
75%
Appareil photo
35 / 85 → 41%
Moyenne
71%
78%
Multimedia - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

HP Pavilion 14
HP Pavilion 14
HP Pavilion 14
HP Pavilion 14
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Test du HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng (i7-1065G7, MX250, FHD, 60 Hz) : PC portable élégant polyvalent à l'écran lumineux
Florian Glaser, 2020-02- 3 (Update: 2020-02- 3)
Alex Alderson
Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - News Editor - @aldersonaj