Asus W7S
Spécifications de l'ordinateur portable
Price comparison
Moyenne de 2 notes (à partir de 7 critiques)
Critiques pour le/la Asus W7S
Source: Laptop Mag
EN→FR Archive.org versionLooking for a 13.3-inch notebook with a great screen and fast performance? Look no further than this four-pound beauty. The Asus W7 platform gets better with each iteration, and the W7S-B1B poses formidable competition to the likes of the Sony SZ Series and most other 13.3-inch thin-and-light notebooks. It combines good looks with an excellent screen, powerful components, and plenty of creature comforts, all for a reasonable $1,699. The 4.3-pound W7S is certainly sleek (view photo gallery). We like its pearl-white finish with brushed-silver accents (a black chassis is also available). In fact, this notebook makes the Apple MacBook, the best-selling 13.3-inch and most famous white portable, look nearly dated. And Asus includes extras you might expect to find only with a pricier machine: two batteries, a Bluetooth mouse (done in the same color scheme as the PC), both a neoprene slip case and a nylon shoulder case, and even an S-Video-to-RCA adapter cable. But our favorite feature is what you don't get: noise. The W7S is wonderfully quiet, even when churning through 3D operations.
4 von 5, Leistung gut, Display gut
Type de critique inconnu, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 08/01/2007
Notes: Note globale: 80% performances: 80% écran: 80%
Source: Star Techcentral
EN→FR Archive.org versionThe Asus W7 has a lot to boast about when it comes to physical beauty. It has nice curves which is good because it doesn't look as boxy and generic as the others. Also the keyboard, despite being a little cramped, has all the keys where they are supposed to be. There's none of that CTRL-and-FN keys-turned-around nonsense that can be found in some notebooks nowadays. I'm glad Asus understands that humans are creatures of habit and would appreciate it if things were moved around less. The neatly arranged ports and drives also add to the beauty of this notebook. For instance, the optical drive is partially hidden from view under the curved design. It also has a glossy screen, which unfortunately, smudges easily so you need to be really careful when touching it. In addition to all that, the notebook also has a small footprint and doesn't take up much space on those round tables meant for three at cafés. To be brutally honest, the Asus W7 did not exactly leave a good impression on me after I started using it. Yes, it is a pretty little thing but there were just too many drawbacks for me.
Display mangelhaft
Critique simple, disponibles en ligne, Courte, Date: 07/31/2007
Notes: écran: 50%
Source: Notebookreview.com
EN→FR Archive.org versionASUS has slowly and steadily gained a reputation for churning out quality yet still affordable laptops. Whilst still establishing its brand in the US market, this Taiwanese company has a bigger presence in the Asian and European regions. For this review I will be looking at the W7S model which is the Santa Rosa update for the 13.3" W7 series. The W7S is advertised in two distinct versions; the white version features an Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 processor whilst the black version has the T7500 along with a bigger hard drive and more RAM. The black version I am reviewing is not the standard version because in the place I bought mine there are many variants of the W7S series, to be specific the model number of this notebook is W7S-3P057. The only difference is that 'Wireless N' is not supported, it comes with a 6-cell battery and it comes preloaded with Vista Home Premium instead of Vista Business.
Display gut, Mobilität gut, Verarbeitung gut, Emissionen mangelhaft
Critique d'utilisateur, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 07/31/2007
Notes: écran: 80% mobilité: 80% finition: 80% degré de nuisance: 50%
Source: Tom's Hardware
DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, De taille moyenne, Date: 04/04/2008
Notes: prix: 50% performances: 70%
Source: Minitechnet
DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 10/29/2007
Notes: prix: 60% performances: 80% écran: 80% mobilité: 60% finition: 80% ergonomie: 60%
Source: Notebookjournal
DE→FR Archive.org versionCritique simple, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 08/15/2007
Notes: Note globale: 80% performances: 100% équipement: 70% écran: 50% mobilité: 30% finition: 90% ergonomie: 30% degré de nuisance: 40%
Source: Hardware.info
NL→FR Archive.org versionComparaison, disponibles en ligne, Longue, Date: 09/20/2007
Notes: mobilité: 80%
Commentaire
NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G: La NVidia GeForce 8400M GT est compatible DirectX 10, elle détrône la GeForce G 7400 et c’est en fait une 8400M GT plus lente. Ses performances sont clairement au dessus de la 7400 on peut jouer à tout les jeux en baissant la résolution Elle est suffisante pour les joueurs occasionnels.
Seuls les vieux jeux peuvent tourner de façon fluide sur ces ordinateurs (S'ils ne sont pas trop gourmands en ressources). Les coeurs à mémoire partagée de cette catégorie ont l'avantage d'être moins chaud et moins gourmand en énergie. Pour le bureau, internet, l'édition de photos, et le montage vidéo ces cartes graphiques n'ont aucune restrictions.
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des cartes graphiques mobiles et ainsi que dans notre liste des Benchmarks affiliés.
Intel Core 2 Duo:
C'est le successeur du Core Duo avec des pipelines 5-20% plus rapides sans consommation supplémentaire. Comme une addition à la conception du core duo là existe un quatrième décodeur, une SSE-unité amplifiée et une unité logique arithmétique additionnelle (ALU). Le core 2 duo pour ordinateurs portables est identique aux processeurs de core 2 duo d'ordinateur de bureau mais les portables fonctionnent avec des tensions inférieures et une vitesse de Frontside. L'exécution des portables également synchronisés est 20-25% inférieure à des ordinateur de bureau en raison de fréquence d’horloge inférieure de Frontside et plus lents de disques durs.
T7300:
>> Plus d'informations sont à trouver dans notre comparaison des processeurs mobiles.
