Notebookcheck

Courte critique du PC portable Asus ZenBook 15 UX533 FD (i7-8565U, GTX 1050 Max-Q, FHD)

Mike Wobker, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, T. Hinum (traduit par Prévots), 02/13/2019

Compact et puissant. Avec l’Intel Core i7-8565U et à la Nvidia GTX 1050 Max-Q, l’Asus ZenBook 15 embarque des composants performants dans un châssis très fin. Avec un SSD rapide et 16 Go de RAM, le portable Asus ne laisse rien à désirer. Lisez notre rapport de test pour voir si c’est bien le cas.

Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD (ZenBook 15 Gamme)
Processeur
Intel Core i7-8565U
Carte graphique
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q - 2048 Mo, Processeur: 1000 MHz, Mémoire: 1752 MHz, Boost : 1139 MHz, 398.75, Intel UHD Graphics 620
Mémoire
16384 Mo 
, double canal
Écran
15.6 pouces 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPP, BOE07D8, IPS, brillant: oui
Carte mère
Intel Cannon Lake-U PCH-LP Premium
Disque dur
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, 512 Go 
, 430 Go libres
Carte son
Intel Cannon Lake-LP - cAVS
Connexions
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, Connectique audio: jack 3,5 mm, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: SD
Réseau
Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 18 x 354 x 220
Batterie
73 Wh, 4800 mAh Lithium-Polymère, Autonomie de la batterie (selon les données du fabricant): 16 h
Système d'exploitation
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Appareil photo
Webcam: 0,9 MP, 16:9, 1 280 x 720
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: stéréo, Harman Kardon, Clavier: chiclet, Rétroéclairage du clavier: oui, adaptateur secteur, chiffon de nettoyage, 24 Mois Garantie
Poids
1.6 kg, Alimentation: 383 g
Prix
1 600 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD

Comparaison des tailles

365.8 mm 252.8 mm 20.2 mm 2 kg365 mm 251 mm 18.9 mm 1.9 kg360 mm 254 mm 18.9 mm 2.1 kg355 mm 235 mm 19.9 mm 2 kg354 mm 220 mm 18 mm 1.6 kg
Côté gauche : grille du ventilateur, USB 3.1 Gen 1 port, jack écouteurs / micro.
Côté gauche : grille du ventilateur, USB 3.1 Gen 1 port, jack écouteurs / micro.
Côté droit : lecteur de carte SD, USB 3.1 Gen 1, USB C 3.1 Gen 2, HDMI, entrée secteur.
Côté droit : lecteur de carte SD, USB 3.1 Gen 1, USB C 3.1 Gen 2, HDMI, entrée secteur.
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
152.1 MB/s ∼100% +132%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
75.1 MB/s ∼49% +14%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
65.6 MB/s ∼43%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
64.2 MB/s ∼42% -2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (11.2 - 190, n=174)
57 MB/s ∼37% -13%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
210 MB/s ∼100% +169%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
84.5 MB/s ∼40% +8%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78 MB/s ∼37%
Average of class Multimedia
  (10.2 - 253, n=171)
73.2 MB/s ∼35% -6%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade 15 Base Model
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
666 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
664 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
662 MBit/s ∼99% +2%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
651 (min: 547, max: 681) MBit/s ∼98%
Average of class Multimedia
  (44 - 949, n=135)
498 MBit/s ∼75% -24%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
362 MBit/s ∼54% -44%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade 15 Base Model
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
653 MBit/s ∼100% +1%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
649 MBit/s ∼99% +1%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
644 (min: 499, max: 661) MBit/s ∼99%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
584 MBit/s ∼89% -9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (46.1 - 949, n=134)
476 MBit/s ∼73% -26%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
124 MBit/s ∼19% -81%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø650 (547-681)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø643 (499-661)
323
cd/m²
334
cd/m²
332
cd/m²
294
cd/m²
311
cd/m²
291
cd/m²
281
cd/m²
291
cd/m²
272
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
BOE07D8
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 334 cd/m² Moyenne: 303.2 cd/m² Minimum: 17.1 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 81 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 311 cd/m²
Contraste: 1296:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.1 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 2.48
ΔE Greyscale 4.93 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
88% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 58% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.44
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
BOE07D8, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Razer Blade 15 Base Model
BOE NV156FHM-N61, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS
B156HAK02.0, , 1920x1080, 15.6
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
AUO30EB, , 3840x2160, 15.6
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1, , 3840x2160, 15.6
Response Times
9%
26%
-1%
20%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
45 (21, 24)
39.2 (19.6, 19.6)
13%
33.2 (15.6, 17.6)
26%
56 (26, 30)
-24%
44 (22, 22)
2%
Response Time Black / White *
37 (23, 14)
35.2 (20.4, 14.8)
5%
27.6 (14.8, 12.8)
25%
29 (14, 15)
22%
22.8 (12, 10.8)
38%
PWM Frequency
21190 (99)
Screen
-2%
-26%
7%
3%
Brightness middle
311
273.6
-12%
254.5
-18%
440
41%
357.6
15%
Brightness
303
262
-14%
238
-21%
389
28%
350
16%
Brightness Distribution
81
86
6%
87
7%
83
2%
85
5%
Black Level *
0.24
0.3
-25%
0.27
-13%
0.34
-42%
0.35
-46%
Contrast
1296
912
-30%
943
-27%
1294
0%
1022
-21%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.1
3.22
37%
4.58
10%
5.04
1%
4.12
19%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.91
7.61
15%
17.99
-102%
6.99
22%
9.91
-11%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.48
4.1
-65%
4.34
-75%
2.04
18%
4.23
-71%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.93
1.4
72%
3.3
33%
4.98
-1%
1.8
63%
Gamma
2.44 90%
2.24 98%
2.403 92%
2.48 89%
2.17 101%
CCT
7641 85%
6636 98%
6355 102%
7777 84%
6613 98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
58
56.4
-3%
35
-40%
61
5%
87.5
51%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
88
86.2
-2%
55
-37%
94
7%
100
14%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
4% / -0%
0% / -18%
3% / 6%
12% / 6%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
37 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 23 ms hausse
↘ 14 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 94 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (25 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
45 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 21 ms hausse
↘ 24 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 70 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (39.8 ms) de tous les appareils testés.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9418 (minimum : 43 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930Tooltip
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i7-8565U: Ø704 (683.27-815.1)
Razer Blade 15 Base Model Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø864 (856.88-926.63)
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS Intel Core i7-8650U, Intel Core i7-8650U: Ø482 (448.21-590.42)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
Intel Core i9-8950HK
191 Points ∼100% 0%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Intel Core i7-8565U
191 Points ∼100%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
Intel Core i7-8750H
177 Points ∼93% -7%
Razer Blade 15 Base Model
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points ∼92% -8%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (73.1 - 193, n=44)
171 Points ∼90% -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS
Intel Core i7-8650U
166 Points ∼87% -13%
Average of class Multimedia
  (36 - 201, n=363)
127 Points ∼66% -34%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
Intel Core i7-8750H
1131 Points ∼100% +39%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1074 Points ∼95% +32%
Razer Blade 15 Base Model
Intel Core i7-8750H
923 Points ∼82% +13%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Intel Core i7-8565U
815 Points ∼72%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS
Intel Core i7-8650U
605 Points ∼53% -26%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U
  (361 - 815, n=45)
591 Points ∼52% -27%
Average of class Multimedia
  (73 - 1550, n=379)
484 Points ∼43% -41%
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
23118
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
1803
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
2682
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
7.4 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
0.65 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
20.54 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
119.91 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
815 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
191 Points
Aide
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8950HK, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
5802 Points ∼100% +38%
Razer Blade 15 Base Model
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5417 Points ∼93% +29%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
4920 Points ∼85% +17%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
4204 Points ∼72%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
  (3905 - 4204, n=2)
4055 Points ∼70% -4%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1001 - 7161, n=95)
3721 Points ∼64% -11%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3050 Points ∼53% -27%
Productivity
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8950HK, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
8020 Points ∼100% +17%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
6879 Points ∼86%
Razer Blade 15 Base Model
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
6855 Points ∼85% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6809 Points ∼85% -1%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
6770 Points ∼84% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
  (6120 - 6879, n=2)
6500 Points ∼81% -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1407 - 8020, n=96)
6150 Points ∼77% -11%
Essentials
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8950HK, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
8971 Points ∼100% +9%
Razer Blade 15 Base Model
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
8577 Points ∼96% +4%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
8281 Points ∼92% +1%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
8233 Points ∼92%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7951 Points ∼89% -3%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
  (7378 - 8233, n=2)
7806 Points ∼87% -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2891 - 9829, n=96)
7480 Points ∼83% -9%
Score
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8950HK, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
5358 Points ∼100% +21%
Razer Blade 15 Base Model
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
4896 Points ∼91% +10%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
4666 Points ∼87% +5%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
4443 Points ∼83%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
  (4020 - 4443, n=2)
4232 Points ∼79% -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1144 - 5469, n=96)
3942 Points ∼74% -11%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3933 Points ∼73% -11%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Razer Blade 15 Base Model
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5395 Points ∼100% 0%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
5381 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
  (4905 - 5381, n=2)
5143 Points ∼95% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5038 Points ∼93% -6%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
4643 Points ∼86% -14%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8950HK, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
4456 Points ∼83% -17%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2213 - 5651, n=278)
4294 Points ∼80% -20%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Razer Blade 15 Base Model
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
4425 Points ∼100% +9%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
4052 Points ∼92%
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
  (3801 - 4052, n=2)
3927 Points ∼89% -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3728 Points ∼84% -8%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8950HK, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
3661 Points ∼83% -10%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
3433 Points ∼78% -15%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1371 - 4693, n=299)
3379 Points ∼76% -17%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4052 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5381 points
Aide
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
Razer Blade 15 Base Model
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
Average WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
22%
-4%
-1%
17%
10%
Write 4K
126.2
112.5
-11%
122.1
-3%
94.81
-25%
125
-1%
134 (98.2 - 191, n=17)
6%
Read 4K
41.2
43.09
5%
44.61
8%
26.45
-36%
44.68
8%
43 (27.6 - 53.1, n=17)
4%
Write Seq
1055
1450
37%
825.7
-22%
1037
-2%
1059
0%
1249 (750 - 1768, n=17)
18%
Read Seq
883.8
1392
58%
810.6
-8%
1280
45%
771.7
-13%
1218 (423 - 1710, n=17)
38%
Write 4K Q32T1
445.5
356.1
-20%
293.9
-34%
277.6
-38%
506.6
14%
403 (258 - 749, n=17)
-10%
Read 4K Q32T1
338.8
406.9
20%
374.8
11%
333.9
-1%
614
81%
404 (229 - 654, n=17)
19%
Write Seq Q32T1
1453
1451
0%
1714
18%
1037
-29%
1763
21%
1511 (1319 - 2544, n=17)
4%
Read Seq Q32T1
1734
3272
89%
1772
2%
3135
81%
2171
25%
1751 (473 - 3433, n=17)
1%
Write 4K Q8T8
1043.5
602 (437 - 768, n=2)
Read 4K Q8T8
913.6
1039 (988 - 1090, n=2)
AS SSD
31%
46%
26%
69%
36%
Copy Game MB/s
1069.77
1129.32
728.25
778 (528 - 1059, n=9)
Copy Program MB/s
495.54
395.41
430.94
376 (236 - 457, n=9)
Copy ISO MB/s
1891.98
2507.07
1045.16
1133 (765 - 1404, n=9)
Score Total
2845
2952
4%
3587
26%
2768
-3%
4065
43%
3235 (2279 - 4334, n=17)
14%
Score Write
1220
1499
23%
1564
28%
1153
-5%
1547
27%
1434 (1075 - 1879, n=17)
18%
Score Read
1075
970
-10%
1336
24%
1120
4%
1679
56%
1191 (721 - 1638, n=17)
11%
Access Time Write *
0.027
0.04
-48%
0.035
-30%
0.056
-107%
0.036
-33%
0.0299 (0.021 - 0.047, n=17)
-11%
Access Time Read *
0.08
0.113
-41%
0.047
41%
0.051
36%
0.04
50%
0.0758 (0.046 - 0.129, n=15)
5%
4K-64 Write
1047.43
1269.69
21%
1325.22
27%
953.17
-9%
1272.75
22%
1179 (871 - 1459, n=17)
13%
4K-64 Read
974.82
748.68
-23%
1139.74
17%
855.74
-12%
1431.02
47%
1009 (647 - 1296, n=17)
4%
4K Write
131.57
92.98
-29%
106.22
-19%
105.36
-20%
100.89
-23%
131 (82.1 - 180, n=17)
0%
4K Read
41.81
40.75
-3%
50.78
21%
19.07
-54%
37.78
-10%
43 (34.5 - 48.3, n=17)
3%
Seq Write
411.81
1366.97
232%
1324.07
222%
948.36
130%
1728.67
320%
1236 (412 - 2407, n=17)
200%
Seq Read
578.98
1802.55
211%
1453.55
151%
2454.1
324%
2098.63
262%
1393 (399 - 2934, n=17)
141%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
27% / 27%
21% / 25%
13% / 15%
43% / 47%
23% / 25%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
Sequential Read: 899.7 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1050 MB/s
512K Read: 451.7 MB/s
512K Write: 791.4 MB/s
4K Read: 39.15 MB/s
4K Write: 115.1 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 300.5 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 412.3 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Razer Blade 15 Base Model
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
14351 Points ∼100% +105%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i9-8950HK
8854 Points ∼62% +26%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
  (6874 - 7385, n=3)
7092 Points ∼49% +1%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8565U
7016 Points ∼49%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
6874 Points ∼48% -2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (352 - 20837, n=632)
2951 Points ∼21% -58%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8650U
1802 Points ∼13% -74%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Razer Blade 15 Base Model
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
11366 Points ∼100% +102%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i9-8950HK
7291 Points ∼64% +30%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
  (5622 - 5792, n=3)
5697 Points ∼50% +1%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
5677 Points ∼50% +1%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8565U
5622 Points ∼49%
Average of class Multimedia
  (337 - 16100, n=406)
2846 Points ∼25% -49%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8650U
1118 Points ∼10% -80%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Razer Blade 15 Base Model
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
81720 Points ∼100% +128%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Intel Core i9-8950HK
43721 Points ∼54% +22%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8565U
35858 Points ∼44%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
  (34926 - 36630, n=3)
35805 Points ∼44% 0%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
34926 Points ∼43% -3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2468 - 77755, n=411)
16818 Points ∼21% -53%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8650U
8948 Points ∼11% -75%
3DMark 06 Standard
9694 points
3DMark 11 Performance
7116 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
17993 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
5209 points
Aide
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Razer Blade 15 Base Model
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
38.5 fps ∼100% +28%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
30 fps ∼78%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
  (18.5 - 30, n=2)
24.3 fps ∼63% -19%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
Intel Core i9-8950HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
24.2 fps ∼63% -19%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2.9 - 80.8, n=95)
19.2 fps ∼50% -36%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
18.5 fps ∼48% -38%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Razer Blade 15 Base Model
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
71.4 fps ∼100% +74%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
Intel Core i9-8950HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
44.6 fps ∼62% +9%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
41 fps ∼57%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
  (34 - 41, n=2)
37.5 fps ∼53% -9%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
34 fps ∼48% -17%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3.8 - 117, n=105)
28.9 fps ∼40% -30%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Razer Blade 15 Base Model
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
134.7 fps ∼100% +125%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
Intel Core i9-8950HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
88.3 fps ∼66% +47%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
60 fps ∼45%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
  (59.3 - 60, n=2)
59.7 fps ∼44% 0%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
59.3 fps ∼44% -1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.2 - 206, n=103)
43.8 fps ∼33% -27%
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Razer Blade 15 Base Model
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
204.9 fps ∼100% +220%
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
103.2 fps ∼50% +61%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
  (64 - 103, n=2)
83.6 fps ∼41% +31%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
64 fps ∼31%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8.9 - 296, n=108)
63.9 fps ∼31% 0%
05101520253035Tooltip
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G; The Witcher 3: Ø27.5 (26-30)
Bas Moyen Élevé Ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 26625215059fps
Thief (2014) 106766638fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 64604130fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 98623629fps

Degré de la nuisance sonore

Au repos
30.5 / 30.5 / 30.5 dB(A)
Fortement sollicité
40.8 / 41.8 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencieux
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
bruyant
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (à 15 cm de distance)   environment noise: 30.5 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.133.332.833.12532.332.729.432.33131.932.230.631.94030.329.93030.35028.232.128.828.26327.827.126.127.88027.427.127.627.410026.12825.626.112525.924.924.825.916024.824.323.924.820024.323.722.424.325023.422.421.723.431522.522.921.222.540023.123.220.223.150023.723.519.423.763024.124.718.924.180025.926.217.725.9100029.830.217.729.8125027.929.617.727.9160029.329.417.629.3200030.13117.730.1250030.731.517.530.7315031.433.418.131.440003031.518.230500030.331.618.330.3630027.927.918.627.9800023.423.918.923.41000020.521.21920.51250019.719.91919.71600020.219.619.420.2SPL40.841.930.540.8N3.33.51.33.3median 25.9median 24.9median 18.9median 25.9Delta2.93.41.82.9hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
 42.8 °C47.2 °C43.9 °C 
 37.9 °C44.5 °C31.7 °C 
 30.6 °C27.7 °C29.7 °C 
Maximum: 47.2 °C
Moyenne: 37.3 °C
38.6 °C40.2 °C43.2 °C
32.6 °C38.6 °C37.9 °C
28.7 °C31.1 °C32.4 °C
Maximum: 43.2 °C
Moyenne: 35.9 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  46.3 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 22.7 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 30.9 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.2 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 36.5 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 38.8 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.5 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.9 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.6 °C / 87.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29.1 °C / 84.4 F (-1.5 °C / -2.7 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.932.836.92535.429.435.43142.230.642.24036.53036.55033.828.833.86328.426.128.48027.327.627.310025.825.625.812526.424.826.416028.823.928.820038.822.438.825055.721.755.731564.321.264.340067.620.267.650065.719.465.763066.518.966.580070.517.770.5100070.517.770.5125071.517.771.5160072.917.672.9200073.617.773.6250071.817.571.8315067.518.167.5400070.118.270.1500076.918.376.9630080.318.680.3800078.618.978.61000072.81972.81250076.51976.51600071.719.471.7SPL86.230.586.2N60.91.360.9median 70.5median 18.9median 70.5Delta8.31.88.335.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ZenBook 15 UX533FDApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.33 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.48 / 0.8 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 2.7 / 8 / 10.6 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 74 / 89 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
8565U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Razer Blade 15 Base Model
8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS
8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Toshiba XG5-P KXG50PNV2T04, IPS LED, 3840x2160, 15.6
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
 
Average of class Multimedia
 
Power Consumption
-99%
0%
-46%
-127%
Idle Minimum *
2.7
10.2
-278%
4.7
-74%
6.1
-126%
11.7
-333%
Idle Average *
8
13.2
-65%
7.9
1%
10.2
-28%
18.5
-131%
Idle Maximum *
10.6
17.6
-66%
11.4
-8%
13.4
-26%
22.8
-115%
Load Average *
74
99.5
-34%
47.2
36%
82
-11%
97.5
-32%
Load Maximum *
89
133.3
-50%
48.1
46%
122
-37%
111.1
-25%
Witcher 3 ultra *
113.6
102.9

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
Au repos (module WiFi éteint, luminosité au minimum)
26h 27min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
8h 39min
Fortement sollicité (luminosité au maximum)
2h 51min
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD
8565U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 73 Wh
Razer Blade 15 Base Model
8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 65 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20L9001AUS
8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 56 Wh
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA
8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 96 Wh
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 71 Wh
Average of class Multimedia
 
Autonomie de la batterie
-47%
-51%
-20%
-44%
-31%
Reader / Idle
1587
690
-57%
1027
-35%
842
-47%
WiFi v1.3
519
330
-36%
252
-51%
523
1%
375
-28%
359 (96 - 942, n=246)
-31%
Load
171
87
-49%
128
-25%
76
-56%

Points positifs

+ autonomie
+ gestion sonore et thermique
+ performances
+ également adapté au jeu
+ maintenance

Points négatifs

- écran très sensible aux reflets
En test : l'Asus ZenBook 15. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par Asus Allemagne.
En test : l'Asus ZenBook 15. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par Asus Allemagne.

Dans notre test, l’Asus ZenBook 15 s’avère être un portable très puissant et très mobile, qui peut faire tourner tous les jeux vidéo actuels. Sa finesse, son excellente autonomie et son poids réduit font du portable Asus un appareil parfait pour les nomades. Cependant, ceux qui voudraient utiliser le ZenBook 15 pour le jeu devront le garder branché la plupart du temps.

L’Asus ZenBook 15 est un portable de jeu compact qui peut faire tourner tous les derniers titres. Et son autonomie est excellente.

Avec le ZenBook 15, Asus propose un appareil avec de très bons composants, qui peut répondre aux besoins de la plupart des utilisateurs. Les ports absents peuvent être ajoutés grâce au port USB C 3.1 Gen. 2 et le SSD peut être remplacé, mais il n’y a pas d’autres possibilités d’évolution. Mais vu que notre modèle possède 16 Go de RAM, cela devient moins important. Grâce à la technologie Max-Q de Nvidia, Asus peut garder la température sous contrôle. Il n’y a pas de baisses de performances, au moins durant le jeu.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD - 02/14/2019 v6(old)
Mike Wobker

Châssis
82 / 98 → 83%
Clavier
82%
Dispositif de pointage
82%
Connectivité
48 / 81 → 60%
Poids
68 / 20-67 → 100%
Autonomie
91%
Écran
82%
Performances en jeu
88 / 85 → 100%
Performances dans les applications
92 / 92 → 100%
Chauffe
90%
Nuisance sonore
87 / 95 → 92%
Audio
60%
Appareil photo
45 / 85 → 53%
Moyenne
77%
86%
Multimedia - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Courte critique du PC portable Asus ZenBook 15 UX533 FD (i7-8565U, GTX 1050 Max-Q, FHD)
Mike Wobker, 2019-02-13 (Update: 2019-02-13)