Notebookcheck

Courte critique du PC portable Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 (i5-8250U, UHD 620, FHD, SSD 256 Go, RAM 8 Go)

Mike Wobker, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch (traduit par Prévots), 12/12/2018

Simple mais moderne. Le Toshiba Tecra A50 est un portable de 15,6 pouces au design élégant et moderne, que Toshiba a équipé de composants récents. Lisez notre rapport de test pour voir à qui il est destiné, et quelles performances on peut en attendre.

Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 (Tecra A50 Gamme)
Carte graphique
Mémoire
8192 Mo 
, DDR4 SDRAM, mono canal
Écran
15.6 pouces 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPP, TOS508F, IPS, brillant: non
Carte mère
Intel Kaby Lake-U + iHDCP 2.2 Premium PCH
Disque dur
Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ, 256 Go 
, Samsung MZNLN256HAJQ-00000, 200 Go libres
Carte son
Conexant CX8400 @ Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Connexions
4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 Encoche de Sécurité Kensington, 1 Port pour Station d'accueil, Connectique audio: combo écouteurs et micro jack 3,5 mm, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: SD
Réseau
Intel Ethernet Connection I219-V (10/100/1000MBit), Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 23 x 379 x 258
Batterie
45 Wh, 2800 mAh Lithium-Ion, Amovible
Système d'exploitation
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Appareil photo
Webcam: 2,1 MP, 16:9, 1 920 x 1 080
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: stéréo, Clavier: chiclet, Rétroéclairage du clavier: non, 36 Mois Garantie, TPM 2.0
Poids
2 kg, Alimentation: 220 g
Prix
900 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110

Comparaison des tailles

379 mm 256 mm 23.9 mm 2 kg381.9 mm 253.1 mm 20.2 mm 2.1 kg379 mm 258 mm 23 mm 2 kg377 mm 257 mm 24 mm 2.2 kg358 mm 244 mm 19 mm 1.9 kg

Connectivité

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP ProBook 650 G4 3UP57EA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
68.1 MB/s ∼100% +185%
Average of class Office
  (10.2 - 191, n=267)
60.7 MB/s ∼89% +154%
Fujitsu Lifebook E558 E5580MP581DE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
60.6 MB/s ∼89% +154%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
29.7 MB/s ∼44% +24%
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26.3 MB/s ∼39% +10%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
23.9 MB/s ∼35%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP ProBook 650 G4 3UP57EA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
78.6 MB/s ∼100% +195%
Average of class Office
  (9.5 - 255, n=242)
77 MB/s ∼98% +189%
Fujitsu Lifebook E558 E5580MP581DE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76.5 MB/s ∼97% +188%
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
29.7 MB/s ∼38% +12%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26.6 MB/s ∼34%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672
Qualcomm Atheros QCA61x4
612 MBit/s ∼100% +107%
HP ProBook 650 G4 3UP57EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
557 MBit/s ∼91% +89%
Fujitsu Lifebook E558 E5580MP581DE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
527 MBit/s ∼86% +79%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
305 MBit/s ∼50% +3%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter
295 (min: 186, max: 388) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Fujitsu Lifebook E558 E5580MP581DE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
663 MBit/s ∼100% +17%
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672
Qualcomm Atheros QCA61x4
657 MBit/s ∼99% +16%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter
568 (min: 553, max: 591) MBit/s ∼86%
HP ProBook 650 G4 3UP57EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
483 MBit/s ∼73% -15%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
315 MBit/s ∼48% -45%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø295 (186-388)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø568 (553-591)
260
cd/m²
238
cd/m²
252
cd/m²
252
cd/m²
290
cd/m²
253
cd/m²
227
cd/m²
239
cd/m²
229
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
TOS508F
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 290 cd/m² Moyenne: 248.9 cd/m² Minimum: 25 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 78 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 290 cd/m²
Contraste: 763:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.35 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 3.01 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
86% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 56% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.44
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
TOS508F, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE
BOE0700, , 1920x1080, 15.6
HP ProBook 650 G4 3UP57EA
CMN15D3, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672
AUO, B156HW01, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Fujitsu Lifebook E558 E5580MP581DE
LG Philips LP156WFB-SPB1, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
109%
-15%
5%
18%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
44 (23, 21)
44 (21, 23)
-0%
31 (14, 17)
30%
41 (19, 22)
7%
36 (18, 18)
18%
Response Time Black / White *
30 (19, 11)
31 (17, 14)
-3%
24 (14, 10)
20%
29 (17, 12)
3%
25 (15, 10)
17%
PWM Frequency
20000 (90)
86000 (90)
330%
1000 (90)
-95%
Screen
-8%
6%
1%
5%
Brightness middle
290
283
-2%
305
5%
251
-13%
231
-20%
Brightness
249
252
1%
270
8%
240
-4%
227
-9%
Brightness Distribution
78
75
-4%
80
3%
84
8%
88
13%
Black Level *
0.38
0.63
-66%
0.39
-3%
0.2
47%
0.16
58%
Contrast
763
449
-41%
782
2%
1255
64%
1444
89%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.35
4.02
8%
3.26
25%
5.25
-21%
4.83
-11%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
11.06
8.77
21%
6.84
38%
10.04
9%
8.42
24%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.01
0.8
73%
1.98
34%
3.28
-9%
3.49
-16%
Gamma
2.44 90%
2.35 94%
2.38 92%
2.15 102%
2.54 87%
CCT
7198 90%
6552 99%
6540 99%
6502 100%
6233 104%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
56
38
-32%
40
-29%
35
-37%
34
-39%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
86
58
-33%
63
-27%
55
-36%
53
-38%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
4.03
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
51% / 19%
-5% / 1%
3% / 2%
12% / 7%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
30 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 19 ms hausse
↘ 11 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (25.1 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
44 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 23 ms hausse
↘ 21 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont similaires à la moyenne (40.1 ms) de tous les appareils testés.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) décelé 20000 Hz ≤ 90 Niveau de luminosité

Le rétroéclairage de l'écran scintille à la fréquence de 20000 Hz (certainement du fait de l'utilisation d'une MDI - Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) à un niveau de luminosité inférieur ou égal à 90 % . Aucun scintillement ne devrait être perceptible au-dessus de cette valeur.

La fréquence de rafraîchissement de 20000 Hz est élevée, la grande majorité des utilisateurs ne devrait pas percevoir de scintillements et être sujette à une fatigue oculaire accrue.

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9461 (minimum : 43 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510Tooltip
: Ø480 (477.83-508.65)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP ProBook 650 G4 3UP57EA
Intel Core i5-8250U
145 Points ∼67% +4%
Fujitsu Lifebook E558 E5580MP581DE
Intel Core i5-8250U
143 Points ∼66% +3%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U
  (81 - 147, n=94)
141 Points ∼65% +1%
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672
Intel Core i5-8250U
140 Points ∼64% +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE
Intel Core i5-8250U
140 Points ∼64% +1%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
Intel Core i5-8250U
139 Points ∼64%
Average of class Office
  (20 - 193, n=519)
111 Points ∼51% -20%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP ProBook 650 G4 3UP57EA
Intel Core i5-8250U
605 Points ∼14% +19%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U
  (320 - 730, n=98)
568 Points ∼13% +12%
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672
Intel Core i5-8250U
557 Points ∼13% +10%
Fujitsu Lifebook E558 E5580MP581DE
Intel Core i5-8250U
548 Points ∼13% +8%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
Intel Core i5-8250U
508 Points ∼12%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE
Intel Core i5-8250U
480 Points ∼11% -6%
Average of class Office
  (36 - 1050, n=527)
338 Points ∼8% -33%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
139 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
508 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
44.52 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Aide
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
HP ProBook 650 G4 3UP57EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
2901 Points ∼26% +4%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
2778 Points ∼25%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2688 - 3082, n=64)
2733 Points ∼24% -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
2723 Points ∼24% -2%
Fujitsu Lifebook E558 E5580MP581DE
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
2677 Points ∼24% -4%
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SK hynix SC311 SATA
2656 Points ∼24% -4%
Average of class Office
  (320 - 3884, n=137)
2607 Points ∼23% -6%
Productivity
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
5777 Points ∼60% +5%
HP ProBook 650 G4 3UP57EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
5763 Points ∼59% +5%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3851 - 6653, n=64)
5730 Points ∼59% +4%
Fujitsu Lifebook E558 E5580MP581DE
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
5600 Points ∼58% +2%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
5505 Points ∼57%
Average of class Office
  (1266 - 7964, n=137)
5425 Points ∼56% -1%
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SK hynix SC311 SATA
4811 Points ∼50% -13%
Essentials
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
8110 Points ∼76% +16%
HP ProBook 650 G4 3UP57EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
7410 Points ∼69% +6%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (5855 - 9289, n=64)
7400 Points ∼69% +5%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
7021 Points ∼66%
Average of class Office
  (2683 - 8992, n=137)
6884 Points ∼65% -2%
Fujitsu Lifebook E558 E5580MP581DE
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
6735 Points ∼63% -4%
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SK hynix SC311 SATA
6349 Points ∼60% -10%
Score
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
3609 Points ∼46% +6%
HP ProBook 650 G4 3UP57EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
3574 Points ∼46% +5%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
3407 Points ∼44%
Fujitsu Lifebook E558 E5580MP581DE
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
3338 Points ∼43% -2%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3407 - 4081, n=64)
3288 Points ∼42% -3%
Average of class Office
  (803 - 4597, n=138)
3219 Points ∼41% -6%
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SK hynix SC311 SATA
2208 Points ∼28% -35%
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
3621 Points ∼59% +16%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2986 - 4458, n=67)
3598 Points ∼59% +16%
HP ProBook 650 G4 3UP57EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
3566 Points ∼59% +15%
Fujitsu Lifebook E558 E5580MP581DE
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
3464 Points ∼57% +11%
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SK hynix SC311 SATA
3370 Points ∼55% +8%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
3113 Points ∼51%
Average of class Office
  (1169 - 4770, n=394)
3048 Points ∼50% -2%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3113 points
Aide
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE
 
HP ProBook 650 G4 3UP57EA
Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672
SK hynix SC311 SATA
Fujitsu Lifebook E558 E5580MP581DE
Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
Average Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
 
Average of class Office
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
3%
87%
-13%
-6%
-1%
56%
Write 4K
80.14
89.72
12%
48.25
-40%
80.51
0%
81.9 (76.5 - 89.7, n=6)
2%
94.3 (0.217 - 204, n=141)
18%
Read 4K
32.05
30.73
-4%
23.77
-26%
26.14
-18%
26 (16.7 - 36.6, n=6)
-19%
32.9 (0.176 - 166, n=141)
3%
Write Seq
505.4
158.1
-69%
385.3
-24%
444.9
-12%
356.6
-29%
435 (384 - 505, n=6)
-14%
680 (21.4 - 1895, n=142)
35%
Read Seq
527.9
892.2
69%
1986
276%
497.5
-6%
467.1
-12%
479 (436 - 528, n=6)
-9%
978 (74 - 2827, n=142)
85%
Write 4K Q32T1
204.9
162.2
-21%
339.9
66%
223.5
9%
257.2
26%
245 (205 - 321, n=6)
20%
264 (0.222 - 701, n=142)
29%
Read 4K Q32T1
226.6
320.4
41%
241.7
7%
171.8
-24%
243.3
7%
256 (213 - 340, n=6)
13%
286 (0.647 - 773, n=142)
26%
Write Seq Q32T1
532.7
160.2
-70%
345.2
-35%
510.9
-4%
437.4
-18%
519 (483 - 534, n=6)
-3%
848 (56.5 - 3280, n=142)
59%
Read Seq Q32T1
550.7
932.6
69%
2759
401%
552.8
0%
525.5
-5%
545 (535 - 551, n=6)
-1%
1598 (78.6 - 3560, n=142)
190%
Write 4K Q8T8
4.686
310.2
807 (4.69 - 2067, n=14)
Read 4K Q8T8
452.5
349.5
858 (247 - 1525, n=14)
AS SSD
-195%
42%
-12%
-4%
4%
-287%
Copy Game MB/s
286.07
231.61
234.84
304 (236 - 415, n=3)
294 (17.5 - 1384, n=230)
Copy Program MB/s
246.73
166.43
154.55
305 (137 - 614, n=3)
175 (12.8 - 538, n=230)
Copy ISO MB/s
369.5
301.27
302.18
478 (285 - 816, n=3)
470 (21.1 - 2625, n=230)
Score Total
971
262
-73%
1303
34%
910
-6%
841
-13%
1006 (759 - 1114, n=6)
4%
1315 (21 - 4952, n=348)
35%
Score Write
284
179
-37%
459
62%
330
16%
376
32%
362 (284 - 423, n=6)
27%
434 (8 - 2668, n=348)
53%
Score Read
448
55
-88%
592
32%
383
-15%
305
-32%
423 (305 - 459, n=6)
-6%
589 (6 - 2251, n=348)
31%
Access Time Write *
0.046
0.045
2%
0.054
-17%
0.075
-63%
0.059
-28%
0.0487 (0.04 - 0.069, n=6)
-6%
1.114 (0.021 - 34.1, n=376)
-2322%
Access Time Read *
0.129
2.127
-1549%
0.079
39%
0.142
-10%
0.093
28%
0.1062 (0.07 - 0.148, n=6)
18%
1.549 (0 - 32, n=373)
-1101%
4K-64 Write
156.1
116.58
-25%
327.56
110%
246.99
58%
270.88
74%
251 (156 - 305, n=6)
61%
282 (0.23 - 2280, n=377)
81%
4K-64 Read
366.77
43.28
-88%
408.49
11%
309.7
-16%
236.03
-36%
349 (224 - 379, n=6)
-5%
437 (0.34 - 2072, n=377)
19%
4K Write
78.8
54.93
-30%
94.94
20%
47.64
-40%
71.85
-9%
72.3 (50.9 - 84.5, n=6)
-8%
73.3 (0.21 - 182, n=377)
-7%
4K Read
30.36
2.25
-93%
29.81
-2%
23.71
-22%
24.6
-19%
26.9 (14.1 - 32.5, n=6)
-11%
29.6 (0.4 - 112, n=377)
-3%
Seq Write
493.27
78.87
-84%
362.69
-26%
356.2
-28%
333.76
-32%
393 (246 - 493, n=6)
-20%
484 (41.5 - 2531, n=378)
-2%
Seq Read
512.88
95.9
-81%
1541.71
201%
497.48
-3%
445.03
-13%
470 (433 - 513, n=6)
-8%
813 (42.5 - 2978, n=378)
59%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
-96% / -125%
65% / 61%
-13% / -12%
-5% / -5%
2% / 2%
-116% / -143%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
Sequential Read: 530.9 MB/s
Sequential Write: 510.8 MB/s
512K Read: 465.5 MB/s
512K Write: 297.3 MB/s
4K Read: 31.45 MB/s
4K Write: 72.25 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 266.6 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 188.6 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1805 Points ∼100% +8%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (1235 - 1979, n=154)
1706 Points ∼95% +2%
HP ProBook 650 G4 3UP57EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1686 Points ∼93% +1%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1672 Points ∼93%
Fujitsu Lifebook E558 E5580MP581DE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1573 Points ∼87% -6%
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1529 Points ∼85% -9%
Average of class Office
  (185 - 5332, n=640)
1289 Points ∼71% -23%
3DMark 11 Performance
1804 points
Aide
Bas Moyen Élevé Ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 18.311.58.14.5fps

Degré de la nuisance sonore

Au repos
31.4 / 31.4 / 31.5 dB(A)
Fortement sollicité
31.9 / 31.4 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencieux
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
bruyant
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (à 15 cm de distance)   environment noise: 30.6 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203332.133.931.833253233.633.330.7323133.733.232.832.933.74033.130.331.730.233.15029.63131.53029.66328.226.929.927.828.28027.227.627.827.427.210026.126.326.326.526.112526.726.325.725.826.716024.425.423.925.324.420024.324.323.322.724.325023.122.222.522.723.131522.721.322.22222.740022.321.621.42122.350020.620.320.320.120.663020.220.120.119.820.280019.919.519.518.919.9100020.619.920.518.320.6125021.319.3201821.3160020.819.719.718.120.8200019.618.918.917.919.6250018.918.318.318.118.9315018.518.318.318.118.5400018.418.518.318.318.4500018.718.618.618.418.7630018.818.618.618.618.8800018.918.818.918.818.9100001918.818.918.8191250018.918.718.918.618.91600019.618.920.218.719.6SPL31.931.431.530.931.9N1.51.41.41.31.5median 20.2median 19.5median 20median 18.8median 20.2Delta2.12.22.11.72.1hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseToshiba Tecra A50-E-110
 27.5 °C40.9 °C41.5 °C 
 26.8 °C35.2 °C37.6 °C 
 24.2 °C27.1 °C27.5 °C 
Maximum: 41.5 °C
Moyenne: 32 °C
40 °C35.2 °C27.1 °C
36 °C28.6 °C26.1 °C
26 °C24.3 °C25 °C
Maximum: 40 °C
Moyenne: 29.8 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  47.6 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 22.8 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 29.4 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 36.4 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.5 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 29.4 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.5 °C / 81.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+0.6 °C / 1.1 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.931.830.92531.930.731.93134.932.934.94030.330.230.35031.63031.66328.127.828.18027.727.427.710025.826.525.812525.725.825.716025.325.325.320023.922.723.925023.222.723.231527.32227.340045214550054.620.154.66305519.85580056.618.956.6100054.418.354.4125055.31855.3160071.718.171.7200071.817.971.825006518.165315065.618.165.6400062.518.362.5500058.218.458.2630055.518.655.5800060.318.860.31000058.918.858.91250055.618.655.61600051.418.751.4SPL77.430.977.4N30.71.330.7median 55.3median 18.8median 55.3Delta10.31.710.335.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.433.732.734.133.635.739.230.53237.631.128.732.226.227.42627.126.728.124.835.623.64223.246.822.65622.758.8205319.359.218.771.618.171.21868.617.972.51869.817.967.318.268.518.567.718.669.218.761.518.9601961.419.158.419.458.83180.41.443.2median 19median 601.910.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseToshiba Tecra A50-E-110Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzDell Inspiron 15 5579-9672
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (71.84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (16.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 92% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.48 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.38 / 0.18 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 3.8 / 7.7 / 9.3 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 31 / 34.6 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing 1.3
HP ProBook 650 G4 3UP57EA
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 48 Wh
491 min ∼19% +69%
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 42 Wh
435 min ∼17% +49%
Fujitsu Lifebook E558 E5580MP581DE
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh
429 min ∼16% +47%
Average of class Office
  (105 - 964, n=336)
411 min ∼16% +41%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh
350 min ∼13% +20%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh
291 min ∼11%
Autonomie
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
4h 51min

Points positifs

+ batterie amovible
+ bons périphériques d'entrée
+ lecteur DVD optionnel

Points négatifs

- autonomie réduite
- performances à la traîne
En test : le Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par Toshiba Allemagne.
En test : le Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par Toshiba Allemagne.

Le Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 est un solide portable pro de 15 pouces, assez puissant pour tous les logiciels de bureautique classiques. Notre appareil est légèrement moins performant que ce que ses composants permettent, mais il paraît néanmoins réactif au quotidien. Le lecteur DVD en option et la batterie amovible sont des originalités sur un portable moderne,et même si l’autonomie de l’appareil est exécrable, une deuxième batterie peut être utilisée en cas de besoin.

Le Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 est un portable de bureau puissant qui retourne dans le passé avec sa batterie amovible et son lecteur DVD.

Le SSD SATA III de 256 Go est à la traîne par rapport aux concurrents NVMe, mais il s’avère assez rapide pour un usage bureautique. Au final, il y a des portables de bureau plus chics que le Tecra A50, mais c’est un appareil très robuste qui intégrera bien un bureau. Le machine possède des points faibles, comme ses haut-parleurs peu brillants, l’absence de coque de maintenance et son autonomie réduite, mais le Toshiba A50-E-110 sera un appareil fiable pour la plupart des utilisateurs.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 - 12/10/2018 v6
Mike Wobker

Châssis
83 / 98 → 85%
Clavier
77%
Dispositif de pointage
79%
Connectivité
53 / 80 → 66%
Poids
63 / 20-67 → 91%
Autonomie
81%
Écran
85%
Performances en jeu
44 / 68 → 65%
Performances dans les applications
83 / 92 → 90%
Chauffe
93%
Nuisance sonore
93%
Audio
57%
Appareil photo
43 / 85 → 51%
Moyenne
72%
83%
Office - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Courte critique du PC portable Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 (i5-8250U, UHD 620, FHD, SSD 256 Go, RAM 8 Go)
Mike Wobker, 2018-12-12 (Update: 2018-12-12)