Courte critique du PC portable Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 (i5-8250U, UHD 620, FHD, SSD 256 Go, RAM 8 Go)
Top 10
» Le Top 10 des PC portables multimédia
» Le Top 10 des PC portables de jeu
» Le Top 10 des PC portables de jeu légers
» Le Top 10 des ordinateurs portables bureautiques
» Le Top 10 des PC portables bureautiques premium/professionnels
» Le Top 10 des Stations de travail mobiles
» Le Top 10 des Ultraportables
» Le Top 10 des Ultrabooks
» Le Top 10 des Convertibles
» Le Top 10 des Tablettes
» Le Top 10 des Tablettes Windows
» Le Top 10 des Smartphones
» Le Top 10 des PC Portables á moins de 300 euros
» Le Top 10 des PC Portables á moins de 500 euros
» Le Top 25 des meilleurs écrans d'ordinateurs
Connectivité
SDCardreader Transfer Speed | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
HP ProBook 650 G4 3UP57EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Average of class Office (10.2 - 194, n=334) | |
Fujitsu Lifebook E558 E5580MP581DE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Average of class Office (9.5 - 255, n=306) | |
HP ProBook 650 G4 3UP57EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Fujitsu Lifebook E558 E5580MP581DE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
Networking | |
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 | |
HP ProBook 650 G4 3UP57EA | |
Fujitsu Lifebook E558 E5580MP581DE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE | |
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 | |
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook E558 E5580MP581DE | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 | |
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 | |
HP ProBook 650 G4 3UP57EA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE |
|
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 78 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 290 cd/m²
Contraste: 763:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.35 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 3.01 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
86% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 56% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.44
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 TOS508F, , 1920x1080, 15.60 | Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE BOE0700, , 1920x1080, 15.60 | HP ProBook 650 G4 3UP57EA CMN15D3, , 1920x1080, 15.60 | Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 AUO, B156HW01, , 1920x1080, 15.60 | Fujitsu Lifebook E558 E5580MP581DE LG Philips LP156WFB-SPB1, , 1920x1080, 15.60 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Response Times | 109% | -15% | 5% | 18% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 44 (23, 21) | 44 (21, 23) -0% | 31 (14, 17) 30% | 41 (19, 22) 7% | 36 (18, 18) 18% |
Response Time Black / White * | 30 (19, 11) | 31 (17, 14) -3% | 24 (14, 10) 20% | 29 (17, 12) 3% | 25 (15, 10) 17% |
PWM Frequency | 20000 (90) | 86000 (90) 330% | 1000 (90) -95% | ||
Screen | -8% | 6% | 1% | 5% | |
Brightness middle | 290 | 283 -2% | 305 5% | 251 -13% | 231 -20% |
Brightness | 249 | 252 1% | 270 8% | 240 -4% | 227 -9% |
Brightness Distribution | 78 | 75 -4% | 80 3% | 84 8% | 88 13% |
Black Level * | 0.38 | 0.63 -66% | 0.39 -3% | 0.2 47% | 0.16 58% |
Contrast | 763 | 449 -41% | 782 2% | 1255 64% | 1444 89% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 4.35 | 4.02 8% | 3.26 25% | 5.25 -21% | 4.83 -11% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 11.06 | 8.77 21% | 6.84 38% | 10.04 9% | 8.42 24% |
Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 3.01 | 0.8 73% | 1.98 34% | 3.28 -9% | 3.49 -16% |
Gamma | 2.44 90% | 2.35 94% | 2.38 92% | 2.15 102% | 2.54 87% |
CCT | 7198 90% | 6552 99% | 6540 99% | 6502 100% | 6233 104% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 56 | 38 -32% | 40 -29% | 35 -37% | 34 -39% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 86 | 58 -33% | 63 -27% | 55 -36% | 53 -38% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated * | 4.03 | ||||
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres) | 51% /
19% | -5% /
1% | 3% /
2% | 12% /
7% |
* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances
Temps de réponse de l'écran
↔ Temps de réponse noir à blanc | ||
---|---|---|
30 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées | ↗ 19 ms hausse | |
↘ 11 ms chute | ||
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (24.3 ms) de tous les appareils testés. | ||
↔ Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80% | ||
44 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées | ↗ 23 ms hausse | |
↘ 21 ms chute | ||
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (38.5 ms) de tous les appareils testés. |
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) décelé | 20000 Hz | ≤ 90 Niveau de luminosité | |
Le rétroéclairage de l'écran scintille à la fréquence de 20000 Hz (certainement du fait de l'utilisation d'une MDI - Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) à un niveau de luminosité inférieur ou égal à 90 % . Aucun scintillement ne devrait être perceptible au-dessus de cette valeur. La fréquence de rafraîchissement de 20000 Hz est élevée, la grande majorité des utilisateurs ne devrait pas percevoir de scintillements et être sujette à une fatigue oculaire accrue. En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9686 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
HP ProBook 650 G4 3UP57EA | |
Fujitsu Lifebook E558 E5580MP581DE | |
Average Intel Core i5-8250U (81 - 147, n=96) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE | |
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 | |
Average of class Office (20 - 230, n=618) | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
HP ProBook 650 G4 3UP57EA | |
Average Intel Core i5-8250U (320 - 730, n=100) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook E558 E5580MP581DE | |
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE | |
Average of class Office (36 - 1410, n=626) |
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE | |
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2986 - 4458, n=69) | |
HP ProBook 650 G4 3UP57EA | |
Fujitsu Lifebook E558 E5580MP581DE | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 | |
Average of class Office (1169 - 4770, n=465) | |
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3113 points | |
PCMark 10 Score | 3407 points | |
Aide |
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ | Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE | HP ProBook 650 G4 3UP57EA Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 SK hynix SC311 SATA | Fujitsu Lifebook E558 E5580MP581DE Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | Average Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 3% | 87% | -13% | -6% | -2% | 89% | |
Write 4K | 80.14 | 89.72 12% | 48.25 -40% | 80.51 0% | 78.1 (55.4 - 89.7, n=7) -3% | 108 (0.217 - 248, n=233) 35% | |
Read 4K | 32.05 | 30.73 -4% | 23.77 -26% | 26.14 -18% | 26.8 (16.7 - 36.6, n=7) -16% | 37.7 (0.176 - 166, n=233) 18% | |
Write Seq | 505.4 | 158.1 -69% | 385.3 -24% | 444.9 -12% | 356.6 -29% | 439 (384 - 505, n=7) -13% | 907 (21.4 - 3689, n=229) 79% |
Read Seq | 527.9 | 892.2 69% | 1986 276% | 497.5 -6% | 467.1 -12% | 479 (436 - 528, n=7) -9% | 1178 (74 - 4340, n=229) 123% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 204.9 | 162.2 -21% | 339.9 66% | 223.5 9% | 257.2 26% | 244 (205 - 321, n=7) 19% | 306 (0.222 - 701, n=234) 49% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 226.6 | 320.4 41% | 241.7 7% | 171.8 -24% | 243.3 7% | 245 (182 - 340, n=7) 8% | 327 (0.647 - 773, n=234) 44% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 532.7 | 160.2 -70% | 345.2 -35% | 510.9 -4% | 437.4 -18% | 521 (483 - 534, n=7) -2% | 1149 (56.5 - 4396, n=234) 116% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 550.7 | 932.6 69% | 2759 401% | 552.8 0% | 525.5 -5% | 545 (535 - 551, n=7) -1% | 1903 (78.6 - 6804, n=234) 246% |
Write 4K Q8T8 | 4.686 | 310.2 | 826 (4.69 - 2067, n=21) | ||||
Read 4K Q8T8 | 452.5 | 349.5 | 849 (247 - 1525, n=21) | ||||
AS SSD | -195% | 42% | -12% | -4% | 5% | -204% | |
Copy Game MB/s | 286.07 | 231.61 | 234.84 | 324 (236 - 415, n=4) | 392 (17.5 - 3007, n=293) | ||
Copy Program MB/s | 246.73 | 166.43 | 154.55 | 280 (137 - 614, n=4) | 219 (12.8 - 1353, n=293) | ||
Copy ISO MB/s | 369.5 | 301.27 | 302.18 | 497 (285 - 816, n=4) | 633 (21.1 - 3024, n=293) | ||
Score Total | 971 | 262 -73% | 1303 34% | 910 -6% | 841 -13% | 1017 (759 - 1114, n=7) 5% | 1582 (21 - 6629, n=438) 63% |
Score Write | 284 | 179 -37% | 459 62% | 330 16% | 376 32% | 369 (284 - 423, n=7) 30% | 568 (8 - 2668, n=438) 100% |
Score Read | 448 | 55 -88% | 592 32% | 383 -15% | 305 -32% | 425 (305 - 459, n=7) -5% | 678 (6 - 2754, n=438) 51% |
Access Time Write * | 0.046 | 0.045 2% | 0.054 -17% | 0.075 -63% | 0.059 -28% | 0.05 (0.04 - 0.069, n=7) -9% | 0.916 (0.018 - 34.1, n=466) -1891% |
Access Time Read * | 0.129 | 2.127 -1549% | 0.079 39% | 0.142 -10% | 0.093 28% | 0.1037 (0.07 - 0.148, n=7) 20% | 1.275 (0.025 - 32, n=459) -888% |
4K-64 Write | 156.1 | 116.58 -25% | 327.56 110% | 246.99 58% | 270.88 74% | 260 (156 - 314, n=7) 67% | 393 (0.23 - 2280, n=467) 152% |
4K-64 Read | 366.77 | 43.28 -88% | 408.49 11% | 309.7 -16% | 236.03 -36% | 352 (224 - 379, n=7) -4% | 507 (0.34 - 2128, n=467) 38% |
4K Write | 78.8 | 54.93 -30% | 94.94 20% | 47.64 -40% | 71.85 -9% | 70.6 (50.9 - 84.5, n=7) -10% | 81.8 (0.21 - 214, n=467) 4% |
4K Read | 30.36 | 2.25 -93% | 29.81 -2% | 23.71 -22% | 24.6 -19% | 26.8 (14.1 - 32.5, n=7) -12% | 32.6 (0.4 - 112, n=467) 7% |
Seq Write | 493.27 | 78.87 -84% | 362.69 -26% | 356.2 -28% | 333.76 -32% | 392 (246 - 493, n=7) -21% | 615 (41.5 - 3289, n=468) 25% |
Seq Read | 512.88 | 95.9 -81% | 1541.71 201% | 497.48 -3% | 445.03 -13% | 465 (433 - 513, n=7) -9% | 1007 (42.5 - 5533, n=468) 96% |
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres) | -96% /
-125% | 65% /
61% | -13% /
-12% | -5% /
-5% | 2% /
2% | -58% /
-81% |
* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (1235 - 2006, n=234) | |
HP ProBook 650 G4 3UP57EA | |
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook E558 E5580MP581DE | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 | |
Average of class Office (185 - 8296, n=738) |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1804 points | |
Aide |
The Witcher 3 | |
1366x768 The Witcher 3 medium | |
Average of class Office (5.8 - 64.7, n=84) | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (8 - 12.4, n=25) | |
1920x1080 The Witcher 3 high | |
Average of class Office (3.1 - 45.9, n=79) | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (4.2 - 8.8, n=14) | |
1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra | |
Average of class Office (1.9 - 16.4, n=46) | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2.97 - 5.2, n=6) | |
3840x2160 The Witcher 3 4K | |
Average of class Office | |
1024x768 The Witcher 3 low | |
Average of class Office (8.3 - 103, n=128) | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (8.8 - 20.7, n=60) | |
3840x2160 The Witcher 3 4K ultra | |
1920x1080 The Witcher 3 medium 1080p | |
Average of class Office |
Bas | Moyen | Élevé | Ultra | ||
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 18.3 | 11.5 | 8.1 | 4.5 | fps |
Degré de la nuisance sonore
Au repos |
| 31.4 / 31.4 / 31.5 dB(A) |
Fortement sollicité |
| 31.9 / 31.4 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silencieux 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) bruyant |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 36.5 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.5 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 29.4 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.5 °C / 81.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (+0.5 °C / 0.9 F).
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (71.84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (16.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 93% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.48 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Éteint/en veille | ![]() ![]() |
Au repos | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fortement sollicité |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Légende:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing 1.3 | |
HP ProBook 650 G4 3UP57EA | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 | |
Average of class Office (105 - 1124, n=435) | |
Fujitsu Lifebook E558 E5580MP581DE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE | |
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 |
Points positifs
Points négatifs
Le Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 est un solide portable pro de 15 pouces, assez puissant pour tous les logiciels de bureautique classiques. Notre appareil est légèrement moins performant que ce que ses composants permettent, mais il paraît néanmoins réactif au quotidien. Le lecteur DVD en option et la batterie amovible sont des originalités sur un portable moderne,et même si l’autonomie de l’appareil est exécrable, une deuxième batterie peut être utilisée en cas de besoin.
Le Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 est un portable de bureau puissant qui retourne dans le passé avec sa batterie amovible et son lecteur DVD.
Le SSD SATA III de 256 Go est à la traîne par rapport aux concurrents NVMe, mais il s’avère assez rapide pour un usage bureautique. Au final, il y a des portables de bureau plus chics que le Tecra A50, mais c’est un appareil très robuste qui intégrera bien un bureau. Le machine possède des points faibles, comme ses haut-parleurs peu brillants, l’absence de coque de maintenance et son autonomie réduite, mais le Toshiba A50-E-110 sera un appareil fiable pour la plupart des utilisateurs.
L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 - 12/10/2018 v6(old)
Mike Wobker