Courte critique du PC portable Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 (i5-8250U, UHD 620, FHD, SSD 256 Go, RAM 8 Go)

Name: Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
Brand: Toshiba

Simple mais moderne. Le Toshiba Tecra A50 est un portable de 15,6 pouces au design élégant et moderne, que Toshiba a équipé de composants récents. Lisez notre rapport de test pour voir à qui il est destiné, et quelles performances on peut en attendre.

Mike Wobker, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch (traduit par Prévots), 12/12/2018 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Windows

Exemplaire de test fourni par Toshiba Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 (Tecra A50 Gamme)

Processeur

Intel Core i5-8250U 4 x 1.6 - 3.4 GHz, Kaby Lake Refresh

Carte graphique

Intel UHD Graphics 620

Mémoire

8192 Mo

, DDR4 SDRAM, mono canal

Écran

15.60 pouces 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPP, TOS508F, IPS, brillant: non

Carte mère

Intel Kaby Lake-U + iHDCP 2.2 Premium PCH

Disque dur

Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ, 256 Go

, Samsung MZNLN256HAJQ-00000, 200 Go libres

Carte son

Conexant CX8400 @ Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio Controller

Connexions

4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 Encoche de Sécurité Kensington, 1 Port pour Station d'accueil, Connectique audio: combo écouteurs et micro jack 3,5 mm, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: SD

Réseau

Intel Ethernet Connection I219-V (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2

Taille

Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 23 x 379 x 258

Batterie

45 Wh, 2800 mAh Lithium-Ion, Amovible

Système d'exploitation

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Appareil photo

Webcam: 2,1 MP, 16:9, 1 920 x 1 080

Fonctionnalités additionnelles

Haut-parleurs: stéréo, Clavier: chiclet, Rétroéclairage du clavier: non, 36 Mois Garantie, TPM 2.0

Poids

2 kg, Alimentation: 220 g

Prix

900 euros

Liens

Toshiba Page d'accueil
Toshiba Section dédiée aux ordinateurs portables

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

voir toutes les spécifications

Comparaison des tailles

Fujitsu Lifebook E558 E5580MP581DE Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 HP ProBook 650 G4 3UP57EA Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE ❌

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP ProBook 650 G4 3UP57EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)	68.1 MB/s ∼100% +185%
Average of class Office (10.2 - 194, n=334)	63.8 MB/s ∼94% +167%
Fujitsu Lifebook E558 E5580MP581DE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	60.6 MB/s ∼89% +154%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	29.7 MB/s ∼44% +24%
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	26.3 MB/s ∼39% +10%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	23.9 MB/s ∼35%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Office (9.5 - 255, n=306)	79.3 MB/s ∼100% +198%
HP ProBook 650 G4 3UP57EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)	78.6 MB/s ∼99% +195%
Fujitsu Lifebook E558 E5580MP581DE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	76.5 MB/s ∼96% +188%
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	29.7 MB/s ∼37% +12%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	26.6 MB/s ∼34%

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 Qualcomm Atheros QCA61x4	612 MBit/s ∼100% +107%
HP ProBook 650 G4 3UP57EA Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	557 MBit/s ∼91% +89%
Fujitsu Lifebook E558 E5580MP581DE Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	527 MBit/s ∼86% +79%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	305 MBit/s ∼50% +3%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter	295 (186^min - 388^max) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Fujitsu Lifebook E558 E5580MP581DE Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	663 MBit/s ∼100% +17%
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 Qualcomm Atheros QCA61x4	657 MBit/s ∼99% +16%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter	568 (553^min - 591^max) MBit/s ∼86%
HP ProBook 650 G4 3UP57EA Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	483 MBit/s ∼73% -15%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	315 MBit/s ∼48% -45%

; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø295 (186-388)

; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø568 (553-591)


260 cd/m²	238 cd/m²	252 cd/m²
252 cd/m²	290 cd/m²	253 cd/m²
227 cd/m²	239 cd/m²	229 cd/m²

Homogénéité de la luminosité

TOS508F

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 290 cd/m² Moyenne: 248.9 cd/m² Minimum: 25 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 78 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 290 cd/m²
Contraste: 763:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.35 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 3.01 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
86% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 56% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.44

Profil ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 TOS508F, , 1920x1080, 15.60	Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE BOE0700, , 1920x1080, 15.60	HP ProBook 650 G4 3UP57EA CMN15D3, , 1920x1080, 15.60	Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 AUO, B156HW01, , 1920x1080, 15.60	Fujitsu Lifebook E558 E5580MP581DE LG Philips LP156WFB-SPB1, , 1920x1080, 15.60
Response Times		109%	-15%	5%	18%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	44 (23, 21)	44 (21, 23) -0%	31 (14, 17) 30%	41 (19, 22) 7%	36 (18, 18) 18%
Response Time Black / White *	30 (19, 11)	31 (17, 14) -3%	24 (14, 10) 20%	29 (17, 12) 3%	25 (15, 10) 17%
PWM Frequency	20000 (90)	86000 (90) 330%	1000 (90) -95%
Screen		-8%	6%	1%	5%
Brightness middle	290	283 -2%	305 5%	251 -13%	231 -20%
Brightness	249	252 1%	270 8%	240 -4%	227 -9%
Brightness Distribution	78	75 -4%	80 3%	84 8%	88 13%
Black Level *	0.38	0.63 -66%	0.39 -3%	0.2 47%	0.16 58%
Contrast	763	449 -41%	782 2%	1255 64%	1444 89%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	4.35	4.02 8%	3.26 25%	5.25 -21%	4.83 -11%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	11.06	8.77 21%	6.84 38%	10.04 9%	8.42 24%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	3.01	0.8 73%	1.98 34%	3.28 -9%	3.49 -16%
Gamma	2.44 ^90%	2.35 ^94%	2.38 ^92%	2.15 ^102%	2.54 ^87%
CCT	7198 ^90%	6552 ^99%	6540 ^99%	6502 ^100%	6233 ^104%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	56	38 -32%	40 -29%	35 -37%	34 -39%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	86	58 -33%	63 -27%	55 -36%	53 -38%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *		4.03
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)		51% / 19%	-5% / 1%	3% / 2%	12% / 7%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Temps de réponse de l'écran

ℹ

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.

↔ Temps de réponse noir à blanc
30 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↗ 19 ms hausse
30 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↘ 11 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (24.3 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
↔ Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
44 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↗ 23 ms hausse
44 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↘ 21 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (38.5 ms) de tous les appareils testés.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

ℹ

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) décelé

20000 Hz

≤ 90 Niveau de luminosité

Le rétroéclairage de l'écran scintille à la fréquence de 20000 Hz (certainement du fait de l'utilisation d'une MDI - Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) à un niveau de luminosité inférieur ou égal à 90 % . Aucun scintillement ne devrait être perceptible au-dessus de cette valeur.

La fréquence de rafraîchissement de 20000 Hz est élevée, la grande majorité des utilisateurs ne devrait pas percevoir de scintillements et être sujette à une fatigue oculaire accrue.

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9686 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

: Ø480 (477.83-508.65)

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP ProBook 650 G4 3UP57EA Intel Core i5-8250U	145 Points ∼53% +4%
Fujitsu Lifebook E558 E5580MP581DE Intel Core i5-8250U	143 Points ∼53% +3%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U (81 - 147, n=96)	141 Points ∼52% +1%
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 Intel Core i5-8250U	140 Points ∼51% +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE Intel Core i5-8250U	140 Points ∼51% +1%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 Intel Core i5-8250U	139 Points ∼51%
Average of class Office (20 - 230, n=618)	120 Points ∼44% -14%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP ProBook 650 G4 3UP57EA Intel Core i5-8250U	605 Points ∼13% +19%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U (320 - 730, n=100)	571 Points ∼13% +12%
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 Intel Core i5-8250U	562 Points ∼13% +11%
Fujitsu Lifebook E558 E5580MP581DE Intel Core i5-8250U	548 Points ∼12% +8%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 Intel Core i5-8250U	508 Points ∼11%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE Intel Core i5-8250U	488 Points ∼11% -4%
Average of class Office (36 - 1410, n=626)	389 Points ∼9% -23%

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

139 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

508 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

44.52 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Aide

... en comparaison

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Office (320 - 5878, n=232)	2943 Points ∼19% +6%
HP ProBook 650 G4 3UP57EA UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G	2901 Points ∼19% +4%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ	2778 Points ∼18%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2613 - 3082, n=67)	2733 Points ∼18% -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U	2723 Points ∼18% -2%
Fujitsu Lifebook E558 E5580MP581DE UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN	2677 Points ∼17% -4%
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK hynix SC311 SATA	2656 Points ∼17% -4%
Productivity
Average of class Office (1266 - 8678, n=232)	5858 Points ∼52% +6%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U	5777 Points ∼52% +5%
HP ProBook 650 G4 3UP57EA UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G	5763 Points ∼52% +5%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (3851 - 6653, n=67)	5725 Points ∼51% +4%
Fujitsu Lifebook E558 E5580MP581DE UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN	5600 Points ∼50% +2%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ	5505 Points ∼49%
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK hynix SC311 SATA	4811 Points ∼43% -13%
Essentials
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U	8110 Points ∼71% +16%
Average of class Office (2683 - 10457, n=232)	7481 Points ∼65% +7%
HP ProBook 650 G4 3UP57EA UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G	7410 Points ∼65% +6%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (5855 - 9289, n=67)	7398 Points ∼65% +5%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ	7021 Points ∼61%
Fujitsu Lifebook E558 E5580MP581DE UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN	6735 Points ∼59% -4%
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK hynix SC311 SATA	6349 Points ∼55% -10%
Score
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U	3609 Points ∼41% +6%
HP ProBook 650 G4 3UP57EA UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G	3574 Points ∼41% +5%
Average of class Office (803 - 5606, n=233)	3564 Points ∼41% +5%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ	3407 Points ∼39%
Fujitsu Lifebook E558 E5580MP581DE UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN	3338 Points ∼38% -2%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (3358 - 4081, n=67)	3296 Points ∼38% -3%
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK hynix SC311 SATA	2208 Points ∼25% -35%

PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U	3621 Points ∼58% +16%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2986 - 4458, n=69)	3584 Points ∼57% +15%
HP ProBook 650 G4 3UP57EA UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G	3566 Points ∼57% +15%
Fujitsu Lifebook E558 E5580MP581DE UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN	3464 Points ∼55% +11%
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK hynix SC311 SATA	3370 Points ∼54% +8%
Average of class Office (1169 - 4770, n=465)	3129 Points ∼50% +1%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ	3113 Points ∼50%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3113 points
PCMark 10 Score		3407 points
Aide

	Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ	Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE	HP ProBook 650 G4 3UP57EA Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G	Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 SK hynix SC311 SATA	Fujitsu Lifebook E558 E5580MP581DE Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN	Average Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ	Average of class Office
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		3%	87%	-13%	-6%	-2%	89%
Write 4K	80.14		89.72 12%	48.25 -40%	80.51 0%	78.1 (55.4 - 89.7, n=7) -3%	108 (0.217 - 248, n=233) 35%
Read 4K	32.05		30.73 -4%	23.77 -26%	26.14 -18%	26.8 (16.7 - 36.6, n=7) -16%	37.7 (0.176 - 166, n=233) 18%
Write Seq	505.4	158.1 -69%	385.3 -24%	444.9 -12%	356.6 -29%	439 (384 - 505, n=7) -13%	907 (21.4 - 3689, n=229) 79%
Read Seq	527.9	892.2 69%	1986 276%	497.5 -6%	467.1 -12%	479 (436 - 528, n=7) -9%	1178 (74 - 4340, n=229) 123%
Write 4K Q32T1	204.9	162.2 -21%	339.9 66%	223.5 9%	257.2 26%	244 (205 - 321, n=7) 19%	306 (0.222 - 701, n=234) 49%
Read 4K Q32T1	226.6	320.4 41%	241.7 7%	171.8 -24%	243.3 7%	245 (182 - 340, n=7) 8%	327 (0.647 - 773, n=234) 44%
Write Seq Q32T1	532.7	160.2 -70%	345.2 -35%	510.9 -4%	437.4 -18%	521 (483 - 534, n=7) -2%	1149 (56.5 - 4396, n=234) 116%
Read Seq Q32T1	550.7	932.6 69%	2759 401%	552.8 0%	525.5 -5%	545 (535 - 551, n=7) -1%	1903 (78.6 - 6804, n=234) 246%
Write 4K Q8T8			4.686	310.2			826 (4.69 - 2067, n=21)
Read 4K Q8T8			452.5	349.5			849 (247 - 1525, n=21)
AS SSD		-195%	42%	-12%	-4%	5%	-204%
Copy Game MB/s			286.07	231.61	234.84	324 (236 - 415, n=4)	392 (17.5 - 3007, n=293)
Copy Program MB/s			246.73	166.43	154.55	280 (137 - 614, n=4)	219 (12.8 - 1353, n=293)
Copy ISO MB/s			369.5	301.27	302.18	497 (285 - 816, n=4)	633 (21.1 - 3024, n=293)
Score Total	971	262 -73%	1303 34%	910 -6%	841 -13%	1017 (759 - 1114, n=7) 5%	1582 (21 - 6629, n=438) 63%
Score Write	284	179 -37%	459 62%	330 16%	376 32%	369 (284 - 423, n=7) 30%	568 (8 - 2668, n=438) 100%
Score Read	448	55 -88%	592 32%	383 -15%	305 -32%	425 (305 - 459, n=7) -5%	678 (6 - 2754, n=438) 51%
Access Time Write *	0.046	0.045 2%	0.054 -17%	0.075 -63%	0.059 -28%	0.05 (0.04 - 0.069, n=7) -9%	0.916 (0.018 - 34.1, n=466) -1891%
Access Time Read *	0.129	2.127 -1549%	0.079 39%	0.142 -10%	0.093 28%	0.1037 (0.07 - 0.148, n=7) 20%	1.275 (0.025 - 32, n=459) -888%
4K-64 Write	156.1	116.58 -25%	327.56 110%	246.99 58%	270.88 74%	260 (156 - 314, n=7) 67%	393 (0.23 - 2280, n=467) 152%
4K-64 Read	366.77	43.28 -88%	408.49 11%	309.7 -16%	236.03 -36%	352 (224 - 379, n=7) -4%	507 (0.34 - 2128, n=467) 38%
4K Write	78.8	54.93 -30%	94.94 20%	47.64 -40%	71.85 -9%	70.6 (50.9 - 84.5, n=7) -10%	81.8 (0.21 - 214, n=467) 4%
4K Read	30.36	2.25 -93%	29.81 -2%	23.71 -22%	24.6 -19%	26.8 (14.1 - 32.5, n=7) -12%	32.6 (0.4 - 112, n=467) 7%
Seq Write	493.27	78.87 -84%	362.69 -26%	356.2 -28%	333.76 -32%	392 (246 - 493, n=7) -21%	615 (41.5 - 3289, n=468) 25%
Seq Read	512.88	95.9 -81%	1541.71 201%	497.48 -3%	445.03 -13%	465 (433 - 513, n=7) -9%	1007 (42.5 - 5533, n=468) 96%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)		-96% / -125%	65% / 61%	-13% / -12%	-5% / -5%	2% / 2%	-58% / -81%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ

Sequential Read: 530.9 MB/s

Sequential Write: 510.8 MB/s

512K Read: 465.5 MB/s

512K Write: 297.3 MB/s

4K Read: 31.45 MB/s

4K Write: 72.25 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 266.6 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 188.6 MB/s

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U	1805 Points ∼100% +8%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (1235 - 2006, n=234)	1743 Points ∼97% +4%
HP ProBook 650 G4 3UP57EA Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U	1686 Points ∼93% +1%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U	1672 Points ∼93%
Fujitsu Lifebook E558 E5580MP581DE Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U	1573 Points ∼87% -6%
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U	1529 Points ∼85% -9%
Average of class Office (185 - 8296, n=738)	1502 Points ∼83% -10%

3DMark 11 Performance		1804 points
Aide

... en comparaison

The Witcher 3
1366x768 The Witcher 3 medium
Average of class Office (5.8 - 64.7, n=84)	22.7 fps ∼100%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (8 - 12.4, n=25)	10.3 fps ∼45%
1920x1080 The Witcher 3 high
Average of class Office (3.1 - 45.9, n=79)	14 fps ∼100%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (4.2 - 8.8, n=14)	5.76 fps ∼41%
1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra
Average of class Office (1.9 - 16.4, n=46)	8.6 fps ∼100%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2.97 - 5.2, n=6)	3.38 fps ∼39%
3840x2160 The Witcher 3 4K
Average of class Office	11.7 fps ∼100%
1024x768 The Witcher 3 low
Average of class Office (8.3 - 103, n=128)	30.8 fps ∼100%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (8.8 - 20.7, n=60)	15.7 fps ∼51%
3840x2160 The Witcher 3 4K ultra
1920x1080 The Witcher 3 medium 1080p
Average of class Office	18.3 fps ∼100%

	Bas	Moyen	Élevé	Ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	18.3	11.5	8.1	4.5	fps

Degré de la nuisance sonore

Au repos		31.4 / 31.4 / 31.5 dB(A)
Fortement sollicité		31.9 / 31.4 dB(A)

	30 dB silencieux 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) bruyant
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (à 15 cm de distance) environment noise: 30.6 dB(A)

A pleine charge

Au repos/à faible charge


27.5 °C	40.9 °C	41.5 °C
26.8 °C	35.2 °C	37.6 °C
24.2 °C	27.1 °C	27.5 °C

Maximum: 41.5 °C
Moyenne: 32 °C


40 °C	35.2 °C	27.1 °C
36 °C	28.6 °C	26.1 °C
26 °C	24.3 °C	25 °C

Maximum: 40 °C
Moyenne: 29.8 °C

Alimentation (valeur maximale) 47.6 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 22.8 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 29.4 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 36.5 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.5 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 29.4 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.5 °C / 81.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (+0.5 °C / 0.9 F).

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (71.84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (16.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 93% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.48 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consommation énergétique

Éteint/en veille	0.38 / 0.18 Watts
Au repos	3.8 / 7.7 / 9.3 Watts
Fortement sollicité	31 / 34.6 Watts


Légende: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing 1.3
HP ProBook 650 G4 3UP57EA i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 48 Wh	491 min ∼19% +69%
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 42 Wh	435 min ∼17% +49%
Average of class Office (105 - 1124, n=435)	435 min ∼17% +49%
Fujitsu Lifebook E558 E5580MP581DE i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh	429 min ∼16% +47%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh	350 min ∼13% +20%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh	291 min ∼11%

Autonomie


NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		4h 51min

Points positifs

+ batterie amovible

+ bons périphériques d'entrée

+ lecteur DVD optionnel

Points négatifs

- autonomie réduite

- performances à la traîne

En test : le Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par Toshiba Allemagne.

Le Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 est un solide portable pro de 15 pouces, assez puissant pour tous les logiciels de bureautique classiques. Notre appareil est légèrement moins performant que ce que ses composants permettent, mais il paraît néanmoins réactif au quotidien. Le lecteur DVD en option et la batterie amovible sont des originalités sur un portable moderne,et même si l’autonomie de l’appareil est exécrable, une deuxième batterie peut être utilisée en cas de besoin.

Le Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 est un portable de bureau puissant qui retourne dans le passé avec sa batterie amovible et son lecteur DVD.

Le SSD SATA III de 256 Go est à la traîne par rapport aux concurrents NVMe, mais il s’avère assez rapide pour un usage bureautique. Au final, il y a des portables de bureau plus chics que le Tecra A50, mais c’est un appareil très robuste qui intégrera bien un bureau. Le machine possède des points faibles, comme ses haut-parleurs peu brillants, l’absence de coque de maintenance et son autonomie réduite, mais le Toshiba A50-E-110 sera un appareil fiable pour la plupart des utilisateurs.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 - 2018-12-1012/10/2018 v6^(old)
Mike Wobker

Châssis

83 / 98 → 85%

Clavier

77%

Dispositif de pointage

79%

Connectivité

53 / 80 → 66%

Poids

63 / 20-67 → 91%

Autonomie

81%

Écran

85%

Performances en jeu

44 / 68 → 65%

Performances dans les applications

83 / 92 → 90%

Chauffe

93%

Nuisance sonore

93%

Audio

57%

Appareil photo

43 / 85 → 51%

Moyenne

72%

83%

Office - Moyenne compensée

Linked Articles