Test de l'Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA (i5-210U, UHD 620, FHD) : convertible élégant à petit prix

Name: Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T
Brand: Asus

Miroir, miroir... Après que nous ayons eu une très bonne impression de l'Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD, nous jetons un oeil à son petit frère. Il doit se contenter d'un écran Full HD à la place de l'écran 4K, mais convainc avec un châssis de haute qualité. Nous allons voir ici les autres avantages et inconvénients de l'appareil.

Mike Wobker, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, ✓ Andrea Grüblinger (traduit par Prévots), 07/01/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Touchscreen Windows Convertible / 2-in-1 Comet Lake

Exemplaire de test fourni par Cyberport

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T (ZenBook Flip 14 Gamme)

Processeur

Intel Core i5-10210U 4 x 1.6 - 4.2 GHz, Comet Lake-U

Carte graphique

Intel UHD Graphics 620

Mémoire

8192 Mo

, double canal

Écran

14.00 pouces 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPP, capacitif, AU AUO323D, IPS, brillant: oui

Carte mère

Intel Comet Lake-U PCH-LP Premium

Disque dur

Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1, 512 Go

, 426 Go libres

Connexions

1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, Connectique audio: 3,5 mm, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: micro SD

Réseau

Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0

Taille

Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 18 x 320 x 206

Batterie

50 Wh Lithium-Polymère

Système d'exploitation

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Appareil photo

Webcam: 0,9 MP, 16:9 (1280x720)

Fonctionnalités additionnelles

Haut-parleurs: stéréo 2 x 1 W, Clavier: chiclet, Rétroéclairage du clavier: oui, coque de protection, adaptateur USB vers LAN, McAfee, 24 Mois Garantie

Poids

1.4 kg, Alimentation: 204 g

Prix

950 euros

Liens

Asus Page d'accueil
Asus Section dédiée aux ordinateurs portables

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

voir toutes les spécifications

Note	Date	Modèle	Poids	Épaisseur	Taille	Résolution
85 %	07/20	Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620	1.4 kg	18 mm	14.00"	1920x1080
87 %	04/20	Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T i7-10510U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q	1.9 kg	19.9 mm	15.60"	3840x2160
81 %	02/20	HP Pavilion x360 14-dh1153ng i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620	1.6 kg	20.5 mm	14.00"	1920x1080
88 %	04/20	Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620	1.4 kg	17.6 mm	13.30"	1920x1080

Comparaison des tailles

Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T HP Pavilion x360 14-dh1153ng Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 ❌

Port configuration

Côté gauche : entrée secteur, HDMI, 1 USB A 3.1 Gen 1, 1 USB C 3.1 Gen 1.

Côté droit : bouton de démarrage, jack, 1 USB A 2.0, lecteur de carte micro SD.

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Convertible (10 - 201, n=61, last 2 years)	80.5 MB/s ∼100% +201%
HP Pavilion x360 14-dh1153ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	77.3 MB/s ∼96% +190%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	76.6 MB/s ∼95% +187%
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800	74.4 MB/s ∼92% +179%
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)	26.7 MB/s ∼33%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Convertible (25 - 224, n=55, last 2 years)	97 MB/s ∼100% +253%
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)	85.1 MB/s ∼88% +209%
HP Pavilion x360 14-dh1153ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	83.2 MB/s ∼86% +203%
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)	27.5 MB/s ∼28%

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1383 (1321^min - 1649^max) MBit/s ∼100%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (49.8 - 1775, n=259)	1156 MBit/s ∼84% -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	688 (362^min - 697^max) MBit/s ∼50% -50%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	650 (378^min - 680^max) MBit/s ∼47% -53%
HP Pavilion x360 14-dh1153ng Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	291 (276^min - 329^max) MBit/s ∼21% -79%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1417 (1353^min - 1440^max) MBit/s ∼100%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (136 - 1743, n=259)	1247 MBit/s ∼88% -12%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	888 (626^min - 939^max) MBit/s ∼63% -37%
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	682 (614^min - 703^max) MBit/s ∼48% -52%
HP Pavilion x360 14-dh1153ng Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	262 (248^min - 281^max) MBit/s ∼18% -82%

Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1417 (1353-1440)

Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø888 (626-939)

HP Pavilion x360 14-dh1153ng Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø261 (248-281)

Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 Intel Wireless-AC 9560; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø681 (614-703)

Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1383 (1321-1649)

Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø650 (378-680)

HP Pavilion x360 14-dh1153ng Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø291 (276-329)

Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 Intel Wireless-AC 9560; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø676 (362-697)

ColorChecker Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T: 17.48 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 29.14 ∆E

<a href="https://www.notebookcheck.biz/Test-de-l-Asus-ZenBook-Flip-14-UX463FA-i5-210U-UHD-620-FHD-convertible-elegant-a-petit-prix.470212.0.html">Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T</a> — Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T


294 cd/m²	320 cd/m²	290 cd/m²
272 cd/m²	280 cd/m²	251 cd/m²
305 cd/m²	279 cd/m²	282 cd/m²

Homogénéité de la luminosité

AU AUO323D

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 320 cd/m² Moyenne: 285.9 cd/m² Minimum: 16 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 78 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 280 cd/m²
Contraste: 1346:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.208 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.97 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5, calibrated: 3.42
ΔE Greyscale 2.83 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
85% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
56% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
85.53% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
60.12% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.34

Download Profil ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T AU AUO323D, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00	Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T BOE HF NE156QUM-N64, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60	HP Pavilion x360 14-dh1153ng BOE NV140FHM-N4K, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00	Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 N133HCE-EP2, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30
Display		12%	-33%	13%
Display P3 Coverage	60.12	66.15 10%	39.35 -35%	68.07 13%
sRGB Coverage	85.53	97.16 14%	58.76 -31%	94.67 11%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	61.1	68.32 12%	40.65 -33%	70.24 15%
Response Times		-46%	-20%	-6%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	36 (18, 18)	60 (29, 31) -67%	44 (24, 20) -22%	40 (21.6, 18.4) -11%
Response Time Black / White *	28 (16, 12)	35 (21, 14) -25%	33 (19, 14) -18%	28 (15.6, 12.4) -0%
PWM Frequency			192 (90)	25000 (50)
Screen		16%	-33%	35%
Brightness middle	280	351 25%	248 -11%	340 21%
Brightness	286	335 17%	238 -17%	336 17%
Brightness Distribution	78	87 12%	74 -5%	90 15%
Black Level *	0.208	0.31 -49%	0.235 -13%	0.18 13%
Contrast	1346	1132 -16%	1055 -22%	1889 40%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	3.97	1.74 56%	5.43 -37%	1.3 67%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	8.29	2.76 67%	17.96 -117%	2.8 66%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *	3.42		5.7 -67%	0.7 80%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	2.83	2.22 22%	3.18 -12%	1.9 33%
Gamma	2.34 ^94%	2.35 ^94%	2.56 ^86%	2.15 ^102%
CCT	6556 ^99%	6667 ^97%	6642 ^98%	6735 ^97%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	56	62 11%	37.3 -33%	64.1 14%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	85	97 14%	58.4 -31%	99.6 17%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)		-6% / 7%	-29% / -32%	14% / 26%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Temps de réponse de l'écran

ℹ

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.

↔ Temps de réponse noir à blanc
28 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↗ 16 ms hausse
28 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↘ 12 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences relativement élevées, insuffisant pour le jeu. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 61 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (23.9 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
↔ Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
36 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↗ 18 ms hausse
36 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↘ 18 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 34 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont similaires à la moyenne (37.8 ms) de tous les appareils testés.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

ℹ

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 52 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 15345 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 2500000) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel Core i5-10210U: Ø694 (572.34-716.85)

Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T Intel Core i7-10510U, Intel Core i7-10510U: Ø755 (699.58-835.95)

HP Pavilion x360 14-dh1153ng Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel Core i5-10210U: Ø501 (494.9-546.17)

Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel Core i5-10210U: Ø506 (500.98-533.71)

Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T Intel Core i7-10510U	197 Points ∼100% +21%
Average of class Convertible (47.6 - 243, n=88, last 2 years)	172 Points ∼87% +6%
HP Pavilion x360 14-dh1153ng Intel Core i5-10210U	166 Points ∼84% +2%
Average Intel Core i5-10210U (134 - 174, n=35)	166 Points ∼84% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 Intel Core i5-10210U	164 Points ∼83% +1%
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T Intel Core i5-10210U	163 Points ∼83%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T Intel Core i7-10510U	836 Points ∼100% +17%
Average of class Convertible (90 - 2083, n=94, last 2 years)	721 Points ∼86% +1%
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T Intel Core i5-10210U	715 Points ∼86%
Average Intel Core i5-10210U (320 - 790, n=35)	609 Points ∼73% -15%
HP Pavilion x360 14-dh1153ng Intel Core i5-10210U	546 Points ∼65% -24%
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 Intel Core i5-10210U	515 Points ∼62% -28%

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

163 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

715 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

55.04 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Aide

... en comparaison

PCMark 10
Score
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV512G	4353 Points ∼50% +9%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	4312 Points ∼49% +8%
Average of class Convertible (1154 - 5971, n=82, last 2 years)	4258 Points ∼49% +7%
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1	3995 Points ∼46%
Average Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (3448 - 4353, n=28)	3988 Points ∼45% 0%
HP Pavilion x360 14-dh1153ng UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)	3792 Points ∼43% -5%
Essentials
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV512G	9907 Points ∼86% +24%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	8848 Points ∼77% +10%
Average of class Convertible (3258 - 11505, n=82, last 2 years)	8808 Points ∼77% +10%
Average Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (7172 - 10000, n=28)	8499 Points ∼74% +6%
HP Pavilion x360 14-dh1153ng UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)	8131 Points ∼71% +1%
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1	8011 Points ∼70%
Productivity
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	7151 Points ∼64% +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV512G	6972 Points ∼62% +5%
HP Pavilion x360 14-dh1153ng UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)	6762 Points ∼61% +2%
Average Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (5980 - 7317, n=28)	6663 Points ∼60% 0%
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1	6634 Points ∼59%
Average of class Convertible (1881 - 8653, n=82, last 2 years)	6370 Points ∼57% -4%
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Convertible (681 - 6844, n=82, last 2 years)	3804 Points ∼24% +17%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	3441 Points ∼22% +6%
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1	3257 Points ∼21%
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV512G	3242 Points ∼21% 0%
Average Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2289 - 4463, n=28)	3057 Points ∼20% -6%
HP Pavilion x360 14-dh1153ng UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)	2692 Points ∼17% -17%

PCMark 10 Score		3995 points
Aide

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1	466 μs * ∼100%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

	Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1	Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	HP Pavilion x360 14-dh1153ng Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)	Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV512G	Average Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1	Average of class Convertible
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		98%	107%	101%	23%	62%
Write 4K	54.61	137.8 152%	162.7 198%	172.3 216%	87.6 (54.6 - 108, n=3) 60%	131 (12.9 - 311, n=83, last 2 years) 140%
Read 4K	28.19	44.15 57%	190.5 576%	44.37 57%	40.3 (28.2 - 47.2, n=3) 43%	51.1 (5.32 - 191, n=83, last 2 years) 81%
Write Seq	839.9	2073 147%	450.1 -46%	1492 78%	941 (840 - 993, n=3) 12%	1346 (121 - 4195, n=81, last 2 years) 60%
Read Seq	905	2165 139%	1624 79%	1471 63%	1070 (905 - 1176, n=3) 18%	1557 (256 - 3234, n=81, last 2 years) 72%
Write 4K Q32T1	409.5	431.9 5%	353.5 -14%	483.1 18%	418 (355 - 491, n=3) 2%	382 (15.2 - 803, n=83, last 2 years) -7%
Read 4K Q32T1	292.4	427.7 46%	397.7 36%	550.6 88%	428 (292 - 518, n=3) 46%	389 (17.9 - 849, n=83, last 2 years) 33%
Write Seq Q32T1	1038	2253 117%	936.9 -10%	2950.5 184%	1035 (1033 - 1038, n=3) 0%	1695 (109 - 4931, n=83, last 2 years) 63%
Read Seq Q32T1	1607	3480 117%	2145 33%	3289.4 105%	1629 (1607 - 1644, n=3) 1%	2463 (180 - 7103, n=83, last 2 years) 53%
Write 4K Q8T8				1498.1		742 (122 - 1498, n=9, last 2 years)
Read 4K Q8T8				1530.6		943 (134 - 1531, n=9, last 2 years)
AS SSD		95%	15%	134%	36%	39%
Seq Read	1336.41	2739.08 105%	1240.77 -7%	2719 103%	1398 (1336 - 1454, n=3) 5%	1912 (242 - 4878, n=83, last 2 years) 43%
Seq Write	652.81	1307.15 100%	372.52 -43%	2441 274%	848 (653 - 953, n=3) 30%	1116 (121 - 3660, n=83, last 2 years) 71%
4K Read	26.65	47.43 78%	65.41 145%	51.51 93%	45.1 (26.7 - 54.6, n=3) 69%	46.3 (5.47 - 85.1, n=83, last 2 years) 74%
4K Write	52.67	125.99 139%	114.83 118%	142.79 171%	82.2 (52.7 - 101, n=3) 56%	126 (12.4 - 239, n=83, last 2 years) 139%
4K-64 Read	643.83	1013.4 57%	416.86 -35%	1425.92 121%	852 (644 - 959, n=3) 32%	776 (13.2 - 2827, n=83, last 2 years) 21%
4K-64 Write	482.91	1370.88 184%	515.82 7%	1286.69 166%	654 (483 - 772, n=3) 35%	810 (10.2 - 2349, n=83, last 2 years) 68%
Access Time Read *	0.074	0.082 -11%	0.097 -31%	0.041 45%	0.0417 (0.051 - 0.074, n=3) 44%	0.1024 (0.023 - 0.794, n=83, last 2 years) -38%
Access Time Write *	0.072	0.029 60%	0.045 37%	0.029 60%	0.0533 (0.044 - 0.072, n=3) 26%	0.1354 (0.017 - 1.105, n=83, last 2 years) -88%
Score Read	804	1335 66%	606 -25%	1749 118%	1037 (804 - 1154, n=3) 29%	1013 (51 - 3400, n=83, last 2 years) 26%
Score Write	601	1628 171%	668 11%	1674 179%	821 (601 - 961, n=3) 37%	1048 (35 - 2938, n=83, last 2 years) 74%
Score Total	1786	3582 101%	1567 -12%	4310 141%	2372 (1786 - 2695, n=3) 33%	2551 (117 - 8020, n=83, last 2 years) 43%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)		97% / 96%	61% / 54%	118% / 120%	30% / 30%	51% / 49%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1607 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1038 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 292.4 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 409.5 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 905 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 839.9 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 28.19 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 54.61 MB/s

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10510U	7291 Points ∼100% +293%
Average of class Convertible (429 - 17421, n=87, last 2 years)	4343 Points ∼60% +134%
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-10210U	1855 Points ∼25%
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-10210U	1849 Points ∼25% 0%
HP Pavilion x360 14-dh1153ng Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-10210U	1744 Points ∼24% -6%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (1144 - 2006, n=240)	1741 Points ∼24% -6%

3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10510U	5616 Points ∼100% +337%
Average of class Convertible (311 - 13158, n=84, last 2 years)	3186 Points ∼57% +148%
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-10210U	1333 Points ∼24% +4%
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-10210U	1285 Points ∼23%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (557 - 1444, n=209)	1153 Points ∼21% -10%
HP Pavilion x360 14-dh1153ng Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-10210U	1083 Points ∼19% -16%

3DMark 11 Performance		2079 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		1151 points
Aide

... en comparaison

Dota 2 Reborn
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	83.2 (69.6^min) fps ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	82 (71.2^min) fps ∼99% -1%
Average of class Convertible (18.3 - 133, n=72, last 2 years)	76.4 fps ∼92% -8%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (45.1 - 90, n=88)	72.1 fps ∼87% -13%
1366x768 med (1/3)
Average of class Convertible (11.9 - 120, n=71, last 2 years)	54 fps ∼100% +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	52.5 (45^min) fps ∼97% +2%
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	51.6 (44.1^min) fps ∼96%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (25.1 - 57.1, n=88)	43.9 fps ∼81% -15%
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Average of class Convertible (5.6 - 111, n=71, last 2 years)	34.2 fps ∼100% +61%
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	21.2 (19.6^min) fps ∼62%
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	20.4 (19^min) fps ∼60% -4%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (12.8 - 23.5, n=88)	19.8 fps ∼58% -7%

	Bas	Moyen	Élevé	Ultra
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	83.2	51.6	21.2	18.7	fps

Degré de la nuisance sonore

Au repos		30.1 / 30.1 / 30.1 dB(A)
Fortement sollicité		30.1 / 32.02 dB(A)

	30 dB silencieux 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) bruyant
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (à 15 cm de distance) environment noise: 30.1 dB(A)

A pleine charge

Au repos/à faible charge


41 °C	39.1 °C	33.9 °C
38.5 °C	36.1 °C	28.1 °C
32.9 °C	29.7 °C	28.8 °C

Maximum: 41 °C
Moyenne: 34.2 °C


36 °C	39.3 °C	40.3 °C
31.7 °C	36.4 °C	37.2 °C
29.4 °C	33.4 °C	33.6 °C

Maximum: 40.3 °C
Moyenne: 35.3 °C

Alimentation (valeur maximale) 42.1 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 24 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.8 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.6 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.9 °C / 91.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.5 °C / 83.3 F (-4.4 °C / -7.9 F).

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.97 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Consommation énergétique

Éteint/en veille	0.35 / 0.52 Watts
Au repos	3.6 / 7.5 / 9.4 Watts
Fortement sollicité	42 / 51 Watts


Légende: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing 1.3
Average of class Convertible (248 - 1141, n=91, last 2 years)	571 min ∼22% +24%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX563FD-A1027T i7-10510U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 71 Wh	566 min ∼21% +23%
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh	461 min ∼17%
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, 46 Wh	459 min ∼17% 0%
HP Pavilion x360 14-dh1153ng i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, 41 Wh	377 min ∼14% -18%

Autonomie


NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		7h 41min

Points positifs

+ design

+ performances WLAN

+ performances multicoeur

Points négatifs

- maintenance

- refroidissement

- autonomie

Verdict

En test : l'Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA. Modèle de test fourni par :

L'Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA possède un châssis haut de gamme. Il est bien construit et visuellement réussi, mais il s'avère également lourd, ce qui est particulièrement visible en mode tablette. Le très bon clavier et l'écran sans MLI convainquent en mode portable, et la connectivité est très complète.

L'Asus ZenBook Flip 14 est plus un PC portable qu'une tablette, et convainc avec un bon rapport performances / prix.

Seuls l'autonomie en berne et l'écran brillant sont à critiquer après nos tests. Un utilisateur lambda ne devrait pas rencontrer de souci avec, avec un contrôle de ventilateur défensif, et des possibilités de maintenance un peu limitées. Ceux qui n'utilisent pas souvent leur convertible en mode tablette, mais qui ne veulent pas non plus d'un PC portable classique, peuvent être séduits.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T - 2020-05-19 05/19/2020 v7
Mike Wobker

Châssis

86 / 98 → 88%

Clavier

84%

Dispositif de pointage

87%

Connectivité

52 / 75 → 69%

Poids

70 / 20-75 → 91%

Autonomie

78%

Écran

80%

Performances en jeu

51 / 78 → 66%

Performances dans les applications

84 / 85 → 98%

Chauffe

92%

Nuisance sonore

99%

Audio

60 / 91 → 66%

Appareil photo

32 / 85 → 38%

Moyenne

73%

85%

Convertible - Moyenne compensée

Linked Articles

Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T (ZenBook Flip 14 Gamme)

Critique

•

Test de l'Asus ZenBook Flip 14...

Critique

•

Courte critique du convertible...

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Stephanie Chamberlain - Translator - 412 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!