Notebookcheck

Test du Jumper EZbook X3 (N3350, HD 500, FHD) : composants datés pour châssis moyen

Sebastian Jentsch, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch (traduit par Prévots), 05/08/2020

Ne vaut pas qu'on s'y attarde... Bien sûr, un petit niveau d’argent ne vous fournira qu’un portable de petit niveau. La machine de Jumper, qui est vendue bien au-dessous des 300 $, ne brille dans aucun domaine. La faible qualité de construction, les mauvais périphériques d’entrée et les composants lents sont autant de défauts que nous ne souhaitons à personne…

Jumper EZbook X3 (EZbook Gamme)
Processeur
Intel Celeron N3350
Carte graphique
Mémoire
6144 Mo 
, DDR3 SDRAM monocanal
Écran
13.3 pouces 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 166 PPP, PBTB133F006 A, IPS, brillant: non, 60 Hz
Carte mère
Apollo Lake
Disque dur
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 Go 
Connexions
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, Connectique audio: jack, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: micro SD, M.2 2280 SATA sous trappe
Réseau
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.1
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 18 x 315 x 208
Batterie
34.9 Wh, 7516 mAh Lithium-Polymère, Autonomie de la batterie (selon les données du fabricant): 5.5 h
Système d'exploitation
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 32 Bit
Appareil photo
Webcam: 720p
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: stéréo, Clavier: chiclet, Rétroéclairage du clavier: non, 12 Mois Garantie, fanless
Poids
1.264 kg, Alimentation: 152 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Note
Date
Modèle
Poids
Épaisseur
Taille
Résolution
Best Price
68 %
05/20
Jumper EZbook X3
Celeron N3350, HD Graphics 500
1.3 kg18 mm13.3"1920x1080
80 %
08/19
Medion Akoya E4253-30025387
Pentium N5000, UHD Graphics 605
1.4 kg15 mm14"1920x1080
74 %
02/20
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 1-14AST-05
A6-9220e, Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
1.4 kg20.9 mm14"1920x1080
79 %
08/19
Chuwi LapBook Pro
Celeron N4100, UHD Graphics 600
1.4 kg13.4 mm14"1920x1080
75 %
LincPlus P1
Celeron N4000, UHD Graphics 600
1.4 kg16 mm13.3"1920x1080

Comparaison des tailles

327.1 mm 235 mm 20.9 mm 1.4 kg330 mm 219 mm 15 mm 1.4 kg324.2 mm 209 mm 13.4 mm 1.4 kg315 mm 208 mm 18 mm 1.3 kg317 mm 212 mm 16 mm 1.4 kg

Connectivité

Jumper EZbook X3 ports: mini HDMI, USB 3.1 2, audio jack, lecteur de carte.
Jumper EZbook X3 ports: mini HDMI, USB 3.1 2, audio jack, lecteur de carte.
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Subnotebook
  (8 - 186, n=130)
63.3 MB/s ∼100% +160%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 1-14AST-05
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
29.5 MB/s ∼47% +21%
Jumper EZbook X3
 
24.3 MB/s ∼38%
LincPlus P1
 
18.1 MB/s ∼29% -26%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Subnotebook
  (17.7 - 251, n=132)
80 MB/s ∼100% +196%
Medion Akoya E4253-30025387
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
33.9 MB/s ∼42% +26%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 1-14AST-05
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
32 MB/s ∼40% +19%
Jumper EZbook X3
 
27 MB/s ∼34%
LincPlus P1
 
27 MB/s ∼34% 0%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Medion Akoya E4253-30025387
Intel Wireless AC 9462
348 (min: 332, max: 353) MBit/s ∼100% +15%
LincPlus P1
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
305 (min: 296, max: 314) MBit/s ∼88% +1%
Average Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
  (54 - 360, n=62)
304 MBit/s ∼87% 0%
Jumper EZbook X3
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
303 (min: 296, max: 313) MBit/s ∼87%
Chuwi LapBook Pro
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
284 (min: 200, max: 301) MBit/s ∼82% -6%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 1-14AST-05
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
258 (min: 160, max: 297) MBit/s ∼74% -15%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Medion Akoya E4253-30025387
Intel Wireless AC 9462
326 (min: 274, max: 361) MBit/s ∼100% +4%
LincPlus P1
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
318 (min: 271, max: 364) MBit/s ∼98% +2%
Jumper EZbook X3
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
312 (min: 251, max: 338) MBit/s ∼96%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 1-14AST-05
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
309 (min: 261, max: 336) MBit/s ∼95% -1%
Chuwi LapBook Pro
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
306 (min: 239, max: 358) MBit/s ∼94% -2%
Average Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
  (48 - 346, n=62)
284 MBit/s ∼87% -9%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370Tooltip
Jumper EZbook X3 Intel Celeron N3350, Intel HD Graphics 500; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø302 (296-313)
Medion Akoya E4253-30025387 Intel Pentium Silver N5000, Intel UHD Graphics 605; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø347 (332-353)
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 1-14AST-05 AMD A6-9220e, AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge); iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø258 (160-297)
Chuwi LapBook Pro Intel Celeron N4100, Intel UHD Graphics 600; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø283 (200-301)
LincPlus P1 Intel Celeron N4000, Intel UHD Graphics 600; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø305 (296-314)
Jumper EZbook X3 Intel Celeron N3350, Intel HD Graphics 500; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø313 (251-338)
Medion Akoya E4253-30025387 Intel Pentium Silver N5000, Intel UHD Graphics 605; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø326 (274-361)
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 1-14AST-05 AMD A6-9220e, AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge); iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø309 (261-336)
Chuwi LapBook Pro Intel Celeron N4100, Intel UHD Graphics 600; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø306 (239-358)
LincPlus P1 Intel Celeron N4000, Intel UHD Graphics 600; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø318 (271-364)
ColorChecker
28.6 ∆E
29.1 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
25.1 ∆E
29.2 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
35.2 ∆E
35.7 ∆E
35.7 ∆E
22.5 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
28.5 ∆E
25.5 ∆E
39.6 ∆E
26.2 ∆E
34 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
25 ∆E
21.5 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Jumper EZbook X3: 25.11 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 39.6 ∆E
204
cd/m²
205
cd/m²
199
cd/m²
206
cd/m²
209
cd/m²
199
cd/m²
203
cd/m²
200
cd/m²
205
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
PBTB133F006 A
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 209 cd/m² Moyenne: 203.3 cd/m² Minimum: 17.4 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 95 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 210 cd/m²
Contraste: 1045:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.43 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9, calibrated: 1.68
ΔE Greyscale 9.81 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
89% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.46
Jumper EZbook X3
PBTB133F006 A, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Medion Akoya E4253-30025387
Chi Mei N140HCA-EAB, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 1-14AST-05
Chi Mei N140HGA-EA1, TN LED, 1920x1080, 14
Chuwi LapBook Pro
BOE CQ HV140FHNM-N61, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
LincPlus P1
LC133LF2L03, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Response Times
-5%
15%
-6%
3%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
34 (22, 12)
42 (23, 19)
-24%
44 (24, 20)
-29%
42 (21, 21)
-24%
36 (20, 16)
-6%
Response Time Black / White *
33 (21, 12)
28 (16, 12)
15%
14 (10, 4)
58%
29 (15, 14)
12%
29 (17, 12)
12%
PWM Frequency
24500 (20)
147 (60)
200 (90)
250 (20)
Screen
-12%
-49%
-9%
4%
Brightness middle
209
262
25%
245
17%
297
42%
264
26%
Brightness
203
242
19%
226
11%
268
32%
256
26%
Brightness Distribution
95
87
-8%
86
-9%
77
-19%
84
-12%
Black Level *
0.2
0.505
-153%
0.445
-123%
0.625
-213%
0.25
-25%
Contrast
1045
519
-50%
551
-47%
475
-55%
1056
1%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
8.43
5.49
35%
10.75
-28%
5.23
38%
7.36
13%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
14.77
10.63
28%
20.82
-41%
9.53
35%
12.72
14%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.68
5.48
-226%
2.12
-26%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
9.81
4.84
51%
12.85
-31%
6.72
31%
8.74
11%
Gamma
2.46 89%
2.3 96%
2.42 91%
2.38 92%
2.41 91%
CCT
10135 64%
6347 102%
15973 41%
7015 93%
8741 74%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
57
39
-32%
39
-32%
63
11%
62
9%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
89
61
-31%
62
-30%
96
8%
95
7%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
-9% / -10%
-17% / -39%
-8% / -9%
4% / 4%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
33 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 21 ms hausse
↘ 12 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 85 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (24.8 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
34 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 22 ms hausse
↘ 12 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 26 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (39.3 ms) de tous les appareils testés.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 50 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 18192 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 2500000) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Jumper EZBook X3 - CalMAN : échelles de griss.
Jumper EZBook X3 - CalMAN : échelles de griss.
Jumper EZBook X3 - CalMAN : saturation.
Jumper EZBook X3 - CalMAN : saturation.
Jumper EZBook X3 - CalMAN ColorChecker.
Jumper EZBook X3 - CalMAN ColorChecker.
Jumper EZBook X3 - CalMAN : échelles de gris après calibrage.
Jumper EZBook X3 - CalMAN : échelles de gris après calibrage.
Jumper EZBook X3 - CalMAN : saturation après calibrage.
Jumper EZBook X3 - CalMAN : saturation après calibrage.
Jumper EZBook X3 - CalMAN ColorChecker après calibrage.
Jumper EZBook X3 - CalMAN ColorChecker après calibrage.
Jumper EZBook X3 - Espace colorimétrique AdobeRVB 57%.
Jumper EZBook X3 - Espace colorimétrique AdobeRVB 57%.
Jumper EZBook X3 - Espace colorimétrique sRVB 89%.
Jumper EZBook X3 - Espace colorimétrique sRVB 89%.
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260Tooltip
Jumper EZbook X3 Intel Celeron N3350, Intel Celeron N3350: Ø81.8 (81.02-82.28)
Medion Akoya E4253-30025387 Intel Pentium Silver N5000, Intel Pentium Silver N5000: Ø227 (224.67-233.04)
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 1-14AST-05 AMD A6-9220e, AMD A6-9220e: Ø40.5 (32.79-86.07)
Chuwi LapBook Pro Intel Celeron N4100, Intel Celeron N4100: Ø251 (249.39-252.12)
LincPlus P1 Intel Celeron N4000, Intel Celeron N4000: Ø120 (118.17-121.14)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook
  (20 - 185, n=305)
119 Points ∼53% +174%
Medion Akoya E4253-30025387
Intel Pentium Silver N5000
76 Points ∼34% +75%
LincPlus P1
Intel Celeron N4000
70.9 Points ∼32% +63%
Chuwi LapBook Pro
Intel Celeron N4100
69 Points ∼31% +59%
Average Intel Celeron N3350
  (43 - 48, n=9)
45.7 Points ∼20% +5%
Jumper EZbook X3
Intel Celeron N3350
43.4 Points ∼19%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 1-14AST-05
AMD A6-9220e
31 Points ∼14% -29%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook
  (32 - 1051, n=317)
358 Points ∼8% +335%
Chuwi LapBook Pro
Intel Celeron N4100
251 Points ∼6% +205%
Medion Akoya E4253-30025387
Intel Pentium Silver N5000
233 Points ∼5% +183%
LincPlus P1
Intel Celeron N4000
121 (min: 118.17, max: 121.14) Points ∼3% +47%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 1-14AST-05
AMD A6-9220e
86 Points ∼2% +4%
Average Intel Celeron N3350
  (81 - 92, n=9)
85.4 Points ∼2% +4%
Jumper EZbook X3
Intel Celeron N3350
82.3 (min: 81.02, max: 82.28) Points ∼2%
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
82.3 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
13.5 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
43.4 Points
Aide
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Subnotebook
  (405 - 4338, n=116)
2545 Points ∼20% +205%
Medion Akoya E4253-30025387
UHD Graphics 605, Pentium N5000, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1378 Points ∼11% +65%
LincPlus P1
UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4000, 64 GB eMMC Flash
861 Points ∼7% +3%
Jumper EZbook X3
HD Graphics 500, Celeron N3350, 64 GB eMMC Flash
835 Points ∼6%
Average Intel Celeron N3350, Intel HD Graphics 500
  (678 - 835, n=7)
761 Points ∼6% -9%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 1-14AST-05
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge), A6-9220e, 64 GB eMMC Flash
405 Points ∼3% -51%
Productivity
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1014 - 7334, n=116)
5256 Points ∼50% +179%
Medion Akoya E4253-30025387
UHD Graphics 605, Pentium N5000, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2966 Points ∼28% +57%
LincPlus P1
UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4000, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2638 Points ∼25% +40%
Jumper EZbook X3
HD Graphics 500, Celeron N3350, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1885 Points ∼18%
Average Intel Celeron N3350, Intel HD Graphics 500
  (1690 - 1974, n=7)
1842 Points ∼18% -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 1-14AST-05
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge), A6-9220e, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1304 Points ∼13% -31%
Essentials
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2062 - 9664, n=116)
6926 Points ∼60% +144%
Medion Akoya E4253-30025387
UHD Graphics 605, Pentium N5000, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4570 Points ∼40% +61%
LincPlus P1
UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4000, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3889 Points ∼34% +37%
Average Intel Celeron N3350, Intel HD Graphics 500
  (2833 - 3510, n=7)
3160 Points ∼28% +12%
Jumper EZbook X3
HD Graphics 500, Celeron N3350, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2833 Points ∼25%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 1-14AST-05
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge), A6-9220e, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2544 Points ∼22% -10%
Score
Average of class Subnotebook
  (743 - 4609, n=119)
3210 Points ∼40% +172%
Medion Akoya E4253-30025387
UHD Graphics 605, Pentium N5000, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1902 Points ∼23% +61%
LincPlus P1
UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4000, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1482 Points ∼18% +26%
Jumper EZbook X3
HD Graphics 500, Celeron N3350, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1179 Points ∼15%
Average Intel Celeron N3350, Intel HD Graphics 500
  (1102 - 1220, n=7)
1175 Points ∼14% 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 1-14AST-05
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge), A6-9220e, 64 GB eMMC Flash
790 Points ∼10% -33%
Jumper EZbook X3
64 GB eMMC Flash
Medion Akoya E4253-30025387
64 GB eMMC Flash
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 1-14AST-05
64 GB eMMC Flash
Chuwi LapBook Pro
64 GB eMMC Flash
LincPlus P1
64 GB eMMC Flash
Average 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Average of class Subnotebook
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-27%
-50%
-12%
-3%
-10%
821%
Write 4K
19.21
6.435
-67%
4.58
-76%
13.46
-30%
20.32
6%
13.4 (1.95 - 26.9, n=14)
-30%
97.8 (3.23 - 191, n=121)
409%
Read 4K
7.435
5.91
-21%
7.106
-4%
7.071
-5%
10.69
44%
9.42 (4.94 - 19.7, n=14)
27%
64.4 (5.37 - 3738, n=121)
766%
Write Seq
138.8
66.69
-52%
37.33
-73%
105.3
-24%
98.56
-29%
90.3 (27.9 - 150, n=14)
-35%
890 (37.3 - 2730, n=120)
541%
Read Seq
219.8
268.9
22%
143
-35%
235.5
7%
217.7
-1%
194 (74.7 - 271, n=14)
-12%
1158 (142 - 2760, n=120)
427%
Write 4K Q32T1
24.39
7.795
-68%
5.623
-77%
14.68
-40%
23.81
-2%
18.7 (2.17 - 62.9, n=14)
-23%
294 (3.6 - 868, n=121)
1105%
Read 4K Q32T1
22.2
22.76
3%
9.663
-56%
24.31
10%
21.84
-2%
27 (9.66 - 48.6, n=14)
22%
332 (9.66 - 1580, n=121)
1395%
Write Seq Q32T1
122.3
82.99
-32%
41.03
-66%
114.2
-7%
79.55
-35%
87.9 (18.4 - 137, n=14)
-28%
1034 (16.7 - 3007, n=121)
745%
Read Seq Q32T1
147.6
150
2%
128.3
-13%
140.7
-5%
140.8
-5%
150 (68.9 - 259, n=14)
2%
1891 (113 - 3569, n=121)
1181%
AS SSD
-1%
-33%
523%
Score Total
163
163
0%
124 (36 - 225, n=7)
-24%
1407 (28 - 5191, n=269)
763%
Score Write
60
62
3%
42.4 (4 - 92, n=7)
-29%
495 (8 - 2379, n=269)
725%
Score Read
65
64
-2%
52.4 (21 - 88, n=7)
-19%
611 (12 - 2339, n=269)
840%
Access Time Write *
0.621
0.774
-25%
1.318 (0.233 - 3.33, n=7)
-112%
0.855 (0.021 - 30.3, n=332)
-38%
Access Time Read *
0.246
0.23
7%
0.3558 (0.151 - 0.86, n=6)
-45%
0.883 (0.032 - 23, n=327)
-259%
4K-64 Write
22.73
23.41
3%
15.3 (1.16 - 44.5, n=8)
-33%
306 (0.22 - 2105, n=342)
1246%
4K-64 Read
22.45
21.08
-6%
20.6 (6.95 - 40.3, n=8)
-8%
419 (0.41 - 2011, n=342)
1766%
4K Write
22
23.21
6%
17.5 (1.31 - 35.1, n=8)
-20%
64.5 (0.2 - 180, n=342)
193%
4K Read
18.41
19.26
5%
20.9 (5.78 - 78.5, n=8)
14%
26.1 (0.35 - 63.8, n=342)
42%
Seq Write
155.78
151.4
-3%
81.3 (18.5 - 156, n=9)
-48%
514 (14 - 2564, n=343)
230%
Seq Read
246.2
236.1
-4%
160 (74.2 - 290, n=9)
-35%
853 (50.5 - 2934, n=343)
246%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
-27% / -27%
-50% / -50%
-12% / -12%
-2% / -2%
-22% / -23%
672% / 649%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

64 GB eMMC Flash
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 147.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 122.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 22.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 24.39 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 219.8 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 138.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 7.435 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 19.21 MB/s
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Subnotebook
  (222 - 3726, n=269)
1131 Points ∼100% +211%
Medion Akoya E4253-30025387
Intel UHD Graphics 605, Intel Pentium Silver N5000
576 Points ∼51% +58%
Chuwi LapBook Pro
Intel UHD Graphics 600, Intel Celeron N4100
430 Points ∼38% +18%
LincPlus P1
Intel UHD Graphics 600, Intel Celeron N4000
386 Points ∼34% +6%
Jumper EZbook X3
Intel HD Graphics 500, Intel Celeron N3350
364 Points ∼32%
Average Intel HD Graphics 500
  (293 - 444, n=8)
356 Points ∼31% -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 1-14AST-05
AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge), AMD A6-9220e
313 Points ∼28% -14%
3DMark Fire Strike Score
349 points
Aide
X-Plane 11.11
1920x1080 med (fps_test=2)
Average of class Subnotebook
  (3.42 - 48.3, n=28)
20.2 fps ∼100% +414%
Chuwi LapBook Pro
Intel Celeron N4100, Intel UHD Graphics 600
5.3 fps ∼26% +35%
Average Intel HD Graphics 500
  (3.93 - 4.7, n=2)
4.32 fps ∼21% +10%
Jumper EZbook X3
Intel Celeron N3350, Intel HD Graphics 500
3.93 fps ∼19%
LincPlus P1
Intel Celeron N4000, Intel UHD Graphics 600
3.42 fps ∼17% -13%
1280x720 low (fps_test=1)
Average of class Subnotebook
  (5.04 - 59.8, n=30)
27.6 fps ∼100% +402%
Chuwi LapBook Pro
Intel Celeron N4100, Intel UHD Graphics 600
7.7 fps ∼28% +40%
Average Intel HD Graphics 500
  (5.3 - 7.6, n=3)
6.13 fps ∼22% +11%
Jumper EZbook X3
Intel Celeron N3350, Intel HD Graphics 500
5.5 fps ∼20%
LincPlus P1
Intel Celeron N4000, Intel UHD Graphics 600
5.04 fps ∼18% -8%
Bas Moyen Élevé Ultra
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 5.5 3.93 3.61 fps
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.531.133.52530.331.330.33133.430.233.44028.52928.55028.428.728.46326.527.126.58025.225.525.210024.524.224.512523.62423.616022.92322.920022.822.422.825021.321.421.331520.320.120.340019.719.319.75001918.81963018.118.518.180017.717.617.710001716.917125016.617.116.6160016.516.516.5200016.616.716.6250016.616.916.6315016.917.216.940001717.317500017.317.717.3630017.617.717.6800017.617.917.61000017.617.817.61250017.917.817.91600018.11818.1SPL29.629.729.6N1.31.31.3median 17.7median 17.8median 17.7Delta21.8230.429.130.429.629.729.63129.73128.425.928.426.825.626.825.624.125.623.522.923.523.423.523.42423.42423.923.223.923.622.323.622.32222.322.22122.221.820.821.821.719.921.720.520.420.520202019.719.419.719.218.719.218.41818.418.217.818.218.117.418.117.61717.617.316.817.31716.71716.916.416.916.816.216.81716.21716.916.116.917.11617.130.830.230.81.31.21.3median 19.2median 18.7median 19.22.42.22.432.833.733.733.831.93434.133.83333.730.931.529.431292928.628.82931.427.527.827.228.626.127.226.426.925.424.924.226.324.524.724.52624.223.824.524.222.421.822.522.4222121.721.320.920.820.22119.719.519.220.419.319.218.519.418.218.618.818.818.218.21818.417.517.717.418.317.217.217.31816.917.41717.616.916.917.117.917.217.216.917.717.517.117.217.917.317.417.418.217.517.517.618.917.717.617.720.317.817.617.820.217.717.817.719.217.817.617.518.617.617.617.518.629.929.929.930.91.31.31.31.5median 17.8median 17.7median 17.7median 18.91.61.61.61.633.531.133.530.331.330.333.430.233.428.52928.528.428.728.426.527.126.525.225.525.224.524.224.523.62423.622.92322.922.822.422.821.321.421.320.320.120.319.719.319.71918.81918.118.518.117.717.617.71716.91716.617.116.616.516.516.516.616.716.616.616.916.616.917.216.91717.31717.317.717.317.617.717.617.617.917.617.617.817.617.917.817.918.11818.129.629.729.61.31.31.3median 17.7median 17.8median 17.721.8233.531.133.530.331.330.333.430.233.428.52928.528.428.728.426.527.126.525.225.525.224.524.224.523.62423.622.92322.922.822.422.821.321.421.320.320.120.319.719.319.71918.81918.118.518.117.717.617.71716.91716.617.116.616.516.516.516.616.716.616.616.916.616.917.216.91717.31717.317.717.317.617.717.617.617.917.617.617.817.617.917.817.918.11818.129.629.729.61.31.31.3median 0median 0median 021.82hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseJumper EZbook X3Chuwi LapBook ProLenovo IdeaPad Slim 1-14AST-05LincPlus P1
 24.2 °C37.5 °C40.1 °C 
 24 °C32.7 °C33.6 °C 
 23.2 °C25.7 °C25.9 °C 
Maximum: 40.1 °C
Moyenne: 29.7 °C
40.4 °C39.5 °C24.3 °C
31.5 °C29.7 °C24.7 °C
28.5 °C27.9 °C24.8 °C
Maximum: 40.4 °C
Moyenne: 30.1 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  34 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 21.8 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 30.6 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.8 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22 to 57 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 39.7 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.4 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.6 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.9 °C / 78.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.5 °C / 83.3 F (+2.6 °C / 4.7 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.931.131.92531.331.331.33128.830.228.84030.32930.3502928.7296327.427.127.48026.225.526.210025.324.225.312524.72424.716025.12325.120023.622.423.62502821.42831536.120.136.140042.219.342.250048.218.848.263049.918.549.980062.617.662.6100067.316.967.3125066.217.166.2160061.716.561.7200058.716.758.7250055.516.955.5315054.117.254.1400056.917.356.9500054.217.754.2630053.117.753.1800054.817.954.81000058.817.858.8125006117.8611600050.61850.6SPL72.629.772.6N26.11.326.1median 54.1median 17.8median 54.1Delta9.81.89.831.931.131.931.331.331.328.830.228.830.32930.32928.72927.427.127.426.225.526.225.324.225.324.72424.725.12325.123.622.423.62821.42836.120.136.142.219.342.248.218.848.249.918.549.962.617.662.667.316.967.366.217.166.261.716.561.758.716.758.755.516.955.554.117.254.156.917.356.954.217.754.253.117.753.154.817.954.858.817.858.86117.86150.61850.672.629.772.626.11.326.1median 0median 0median 09.81.89.834.333.934.33631.33636.932.836.932.329.932.332.728.432.732.52932.528.825.628.831.625.431.634.724.434.733.323.833.333.922.733.942.221.842.248.420.448.452.419.452.458.319.158.361.618.561.668.818.268.868.517.668.568.217.668.266.817.266.869.717.269.772.517.372.571.617.471.669.517.669.564.217.764.255.417.855.453.117.853.158.417.858.455.617.755.655.117.855.180.13080.1421.442median 58.3median 17.8median 58.312.21.412.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseJumper EZbook X3Medion Akoya E4253-30025387
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Jumper EZbook X3 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 88% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

<
Medion Akoya E4253-30025387 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.46 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 1 / 0.85 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 3.3 / 6.4 / 7 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 13.4 / 14 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing 1.3
Medion Akoya E4253-30025387
Pentium N5000, UHD Graphics 605, 41 Wh
555 min ∼21% +18%
Chuwi LapBook Pro
Celeron N4100, UHD Graphics 600, 38 Wh
491 min ∼19% +4%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (206 - 991, n=247)
490 min ∼19% +4%
Jumper EZbook X3
Celeron N3350, HD Graphics 500, 34.9 Wh
472 min ∼18%
LincPlus P1
Celeron N4000, UHD Graphics 600, 34 Wh
370 min ∼14% -22%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 1-14AST-05
A6-9220e, Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge), 35 Wh
339 min ∼13% -28%
Autonomie
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
7h 52min

Points positifs

+ niveau sonore
+ écran anti-reflet
+ deuxième SSD possible

Points négatifs

- robustesse du châssis, qui craque
- périphériques d'entrée
- processeur
- webcam
- luminosité
- absence d'USB C
En test : le Jumper EZbook X3 13,3 pouces.
En test : le Jumper EZbook X3 13,3 pouces.

Le Jumper EZBook X3 est positionné dans le segment le plus bas de gamme possible. Il est actuellement disponible pour 250 € - avec une licence Windows. Sans surprise, le processeur date de 2016. Au moins l’écran IPS Full HD est anti-reflet, et il y a un emplacement M.2 2280 pour augmenter la capacité de stockage.

Alors que se passe-t-il ? Les performances sont juste dépassées par nos tests, et la solidité de la base laisse à désirer, ce qui affecte également les périphériques d’entrée.

Nous ne pouvons en aucun cas recommander ce modèle bon marché. Les concurrents de chez Chuwi, Medion ou LincPlus coûtent un peu plus cher, mais sont plus solides, possèdent de meilleures performances et de meilleurs périphériques d’entrée.

Nous avons là l’un des châssis les plus fragiles et flexibles jamais vu. N’achetez pas cette machine.

Nous pouvons en revanche recommander de choisir le Medion Akoya E4253, équipé d’un Pentium N5000. Ce 14 pouces possède un écran antireflet et s’avère bien plus rapide.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Jumper EZbook X3 - 04/06/2020 v7
Sebastian Jentsch

Châssis
46 / 98 → 47%
Clavier
52%
Dispositif de pointage
57%
Connectivité
33 / 75 → 44%
Poids
72 / 20-75 → 94%
Autonomie
79%
Écran
78%
Performances en jeu
18 / 78 → 22%
Performances dans les applications
45 / 85 → 52%
Chauffe
93%
Nuisance sonore
100%
Audio
56 / 91 → 61%
Appareil photo
20 / 85 → 24%
Moyenne
58%
68%
Subnotebook - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Test du Jumper EZbook X3 (N3350, HD 500, FHD) : composants datés pour châssis moyen
Sebastian Jentsch, 2020-05- 8 (Update: 2020-05- 8)