Deutsch
English
Español
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarTest du Lenovo ThinkPad T495s (Ryzen 7 Pro 3700U, Vega 10, FHD) : portable pro AMD efficace, mais ventilateur gênant
Top 10
» Le Top 10 des PC portables multimédia
» Le Top 10 des PC portables de jeu
» Le Top 10 des PC portables de jeu légers
» Le Top 10 des ordinateurs portables bureautiques
» Le Top 10 des PC portables bureautiques premium/professionnels
» Le Top 10 des Stations de travail mobiles
» Le Top 10 des Ultraportables
» Le Top 10 des Ultrabooks
» Le Top 10 des Convertibles
» Le Top 10 des Tablettes
» Le Top 10 des Tablettes Windows
» Le Top 10 des Smartphones
» Le Top 10 des PC Portables á moins de 300 euros
» Le Top 10 des PC Portables á moins de 500 euros
» Le Top 25 des meilleurs écrans d'ordinateurs
| SDCardreader Transfer Speed | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Office (17.7 - 194, n=83, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Office (17.2 - 205, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
| Average of class Office (54.8 - 1775, n=113, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2019-20QE000VGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 | |
| iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
| Average of class Office (60.8 - 1722, n=114, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2019-20QE000VGE | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 87 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 380 cd/m²
Contraste: 1727:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6, calibrated: 1.2
ΔE Greyscale 4.4 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
96.6% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.26% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.76% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.01% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.54
| Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00 B140HAN05.7, , 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00 N140HCG-GQ2, , 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 B140HAN05.7, , 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00 NE140FHM-N61, , 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2019-20QES01L00 LP140WF9_SPF1, , 1920x1080, 14.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | 0% | -1% | -3% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 67.01 | 67 0% | 67.11 0% | 69.28 3% | 64.48 -4% |
| sRGB Coverage | 96.76 | 98.52 2% | 97.56 1% | 92.17 -5% | 95.78 -1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 68.26 | 69.22 1% | 68.5 0% | 67.44 -1% | 65.71 -4% |
| Response Times | 54% | -2% | -22% | 27% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 60.8 (30.8, 30) | 32.4 (16.4, 16) 47% | 61.6 (30.8, 30.8) -1% | 74 (33.6, 40.4) -22% | 44.8 (21.2, 23.6) 26% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 37.6 (19.6, 18) | 15.2 (6.8, 8.4) 60% | 38.8 (21.2, 17.6) -3% | 45.6 (22.8, 22.8) -21% | 27.6 (15.6, 12) 27% |
| PWM Frequency | 26040 (50) | 2451 (50) | |||
| Screen | 8% | 4% | -16% | -9% | |
| Brightness middle | 380 | 420 11% | 391 3% | 418 10% | 381 0% |
| Brightness | 381 | 391 3% | 389 2% | 400 5% | 375 -2% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 88 1% | 87 0% | 88 1% | 94 8% |
| Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.29 -32% | 0.23 -5% | 0.24 -9% | 0.24 -9% |
| Contrast | 1727 | 1448 -16% | 1700 -2% | 1742 1% | 1588 -8% |
| Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 4 | 2.1 47% | 3.4 15% | 4.7 -18% | 4.6 -15% |
| Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 5.7 | 5.5 4% | 4.7 18% | 8.7 -53% | 8.5 -49% |
| Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated * | 1.2 | 0.7 42% | 1.1 8% | 2.1 -75% | 1.2 -0% |
| Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 4.4 | 3.4 23% | 4 9% | 5.9 -34% | 5.1 -16% |
| Gamma | 2.54 87% | 2.22 99% | 2.49 88% | 2.06 107% | 2.52 87% |
| CCT | 6963 93% | 7168 91% | 6809 95% | 7350 88% | 7052 92% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 62.2 | 63.5 2% | 62.4 0% | 59.9 -4% | 60.7 -2% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 96.6 | 98.6 2% | 97.4 1% | 92.1 -5% | 95.7 -1% |
| Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres) | 21% /
12% | 1% /
3% | -13% /
-14% | 5% /
-3% |
* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances
Temps de réponse de l'écran
| ↔ Temps de réponse noir à blanc | ||
|---|---|---|
| 37.6 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées | ↗ 19.6 ms hausse |  |
| ↘ 18 ms chute | ||
| L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 94 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (24 ms) de tous les appareils testés. | ||
| ↔ Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80% | ||
| 60.8 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées | ↗ 30.8 ms hausse |  |
| ↘ 30 ms chute | ||
| L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 95 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (38.1 ms) de tous les appareils testés. | ||
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)
| Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé |  | ||
En comparaison, 52 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 14793 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 2500000) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4161 points | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5077 points | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3762 points | |
Aide | ||
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14API | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00 | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 (2688 - 4165, n=16) | |
| Average of class Office (617 - 11538, n=118, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2019-20QE000VGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14API | |
| Average of class Office (449 - 8114, n=113, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00 | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 (1567 - 2999, n=15) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2019-20QE000VGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00 | |
| Average of class Office (194 - 2886, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 (578 - 852, n=6) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2019-20QE000VGE | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 3883 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6532 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2187 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 827 points | |
Aide | ||
| Bas | Moyen | Élevé | Ultra | ||
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 106.4 | 22 | fps | ||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 73 | 63 | 36.5 | 33 | fps |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 28.4 | 22 | 19.7 | fps |
Degré de la nuisance sonore
| Au repos |
| 28.9 / 28.9 / 28.9 dB(A) |
| Fortement sollicité |
| 31.5 / 33.8 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silencieux 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) bruyant |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (à 15 cm de distance) environment noise: 28.9 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00 Vega 10, R7 PRO 3700U, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00 Vega 8, R5 PRO 3500U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2019-20QE000VGE UHD Graphics 620, i7-8665U, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G | Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00 GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 3% | -3% | 2% | -5% | |
| off / environment * | 28.9 | 28.4 2% | 29.4 -2% | 28.4 2% | 29.4 -2% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.9 | 28.4 2% | 29.4 -2% | 28.4 2% | 29.4 -2% |
| Idle Average * | 28.9 | 28.4 2% | 29.4 -2% | 28.4 2% | 29.4 -2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 28.9 | 29.4 -2% | 30.9 -7% | 28.6 1% | 29.4 -2% |
| Load Average * | 31.5 | 29.9 5% | 33.3 -6% | 31.5 -0% | 34.7 -10% |
| Load Maximum * | 33.8 | 31.4 7% | 33.3 1% | 33.1 2% | 37.2 -10% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 34.7 |
* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 36.5 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.4 °C / 86.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.9 °C / 82.2 F (-2.5 °C / -4.5 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
| Éteint/en veille | 0.26 / 0.67 Watts |
| Au repos | 4.7 / 7.28 / 9.48 WattsNo related data due to high server load |
| Fortement sollicité |
35.3 / 55.5 WattsNo related data due to high server load |
   
| |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00 R7 PRO 3700U, Vega 10, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00 R5 PRO 3500U, Vega 8, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2019-20QE000VGE i7-8665U, UHD Graphics 620, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G, IPS, 2560x1440, 14.00 | Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 2560x1440, 14.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 11% | -1% | 3% | -15% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.7 | 2.62 44% | 5.1 -9% | 3 36% | 3.4 28% |
| Idle Average * | 7.28 | 5.16 29% | 7.7 -6% | 6.3 13% | 7.5 -3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 9.48 | 8.7 8% | 10.7 -13% | 8.9 6% | 10.8 -14% |
| Load Average * | 35.3 | 40 -13% | 35.8 -1% | 40.8 -16% | 55.4 -57% |
| Load Maximum * | 55.5 | 64 -15% | 43.2 22% | 67.5 -22% | 70.3 -27% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 34 |
* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances
| Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00 R7 PRO 3700U, Vega 10, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T490s-20NYS02A00 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00 R5 PRO 3500U, Vega 8, 50 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2019-20QES01L00 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Autonomie de la batterie | 1% | -13% | -24% | -13% | -21% | |
| H.264 | 750 | 834 11% | 708 -6% | 550 -27% | 688 -8% | 612 (292 - 1204, n=41, last 2 years) -18% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 675 | 607 -10% | 544 -19% | 530 -21% | 562 -17% | 515 (241 - 1124, n=121, last 2 years) -24% |
Points positifs
Points négatifs
Verdict
Avec le ThinkkPad T495s, Lenovo propose un autre très bon portable de bureau, après le ThinkPad T495. Et même si à cause du système de refroidissement limité, il n’est pas possible de tirer pleinement profit du processeur Ryzen 7 Pro, il en va de même pour le T490s avec processeur Intel. Les deux machines sont néanmoins assez puissantes pour toutes les tâches de bureautique. L’autonomie est également très encourageante, le ThinkPad AMD n’étant plus défavorisé à cet égard. Le châssis et le clavier sont identiques sur les deux modèles.
Ce modèle possède néanmoins un gros défaut : son ventilateur produit un bruit très aigu et gênant, par rapport à celui du T490s. Même s’il est souvent désactivé lors d’une utilisation light, Lenovo aurait pu facilement éviter ce problème. L’absence de Thunderbolt 3 ne devrait quant à elle pas gêner trop d’utilisateurs.
Avec le ThinkPad T495s, Lenovo propose une très bonne alternative au ThinkPad T490s Intel, et moins chère. S’il n’y avait pas eu le problème du bruit aigu du ventilateur, le T495s aurait reçu notre total soutien.
Il faut cependant avouer qu’en prenant en compte le prix, le ThinkPad AMD est vraiment une bonne affaire – on peut s’attendre à une économie d’environ 300 €.
Note : à cause du passage à la v7 de notre système de notation, la note du ThinkPad T490s passe de 92 à 89 %. Le fait que le ThinkPad T495s reste derrière, à 88 %, est principalement dû au ventilateur.
L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.
Lenovo ThinkPad T495s-20QKS01E00
-
09/24/2019 v7
Andreas Osthoff
Pricecompare
