Test du Lenovo V155-15API (Ryzen 5 3500U, RX Vega 8, FHD) : portable à petit prix au stockage énorme
Top 10
» Le Top 10 des PC portables multimédia
» Le Top 10 des PC portables de jeu
» Le Top 10 des PC portables de jeu légers
» Le Top 10 des ordinateurs portables bureautiques
» Le Top 10 des PC portables bureautiques premium/professionnels
» Le Top 10 des Stations de travail mobiles
» Le Top 10 des Ultraportables
» Le Top 10 des Ultrabooks
» Le Top 10 des Convertibles
» Le Top 10 des Tablettes
» Le Top 10 des Tablettes Windows
» Le Top 10 des Smartphones
» Le Top 10 des PC Portables á moins de 300 euros
» Le Top 10 des PC Portables á moins de 500 euros
» Le Top 25 des meilleurs écrans d'ordinateurs
Connections
Networking | |
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Chuwi LapBook Plus | |
Lenovo Ideapad L340-17API-81LY0004GE | |
MSI PL62 MX150 7300HQ | |
Lenovo V155-15API | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A | |
HP 250 G7 6HM85ES | |
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A | |
Lenovo V155-15API | |
Lenovo Ideapad L340-17API-81LY0004GE | |
HP 250 G7 6HM85ES | |
Chuwi LapBook Plus | |
MSI PL62 MX150 7300HQ |
|
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 80 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 220 cd/m²
Contraste: 620:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.355 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 10.36 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 12.49 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
57% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 36% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.3
Lenovo V155-15API AUO61ED, , 1920x1080, 15.60 | Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A Chi Mei (CMN15D5), , 1920x1080, 15.60 | Chuwi LapBook Plus BOE NV156QUM-N51, , 3840x2160, 15.60 | HP 250 G7 6HM85ES BOE0687, , 1920x1080, 15.60 | MSI PL62 MX150 7300HQ Chi Mei CMN15D6, , 1920x1080, 15.60 | Lenovo Ideapad L340-17API-81LY0004GE AU Optronics B173RTN02.1, , 1600x900, 17.30 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Response Times | 2% | -36% | 11% | 0% | 13% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 44 (23, 21) | 43.3 (22, 21.3) 2% | 40 (21.2, 18.8) 9% | 41 (22, 19) 7% | 44 (23, 21) -0% | 42 (22, 20) 5% |
Response Time Black / White * | 14 (10, 4) | 13.8 (9.5, 4.3) 1% | 25.2 (14, 11.2) -80% | 12 (7, 5) 14% | 14 (10, 4) -0% | 11 (7, 4) 21% |
PWM Frequency | 25970 (19) | 961.5 (99) | 25000 (90) | 250 (20) | ||
Screen | -14% | 51% | -8% | 7% | 1% | |
Brightness middle | 220 | 246 12% | 360.2 64% | 205 -7% | 227 3% | 230 5% |
Brightness | 200 | 225 13% | 337 69% | 205 3% | 200 0% | 201 1% |
Brightness Distribution | 80 | 81 1% | 82 3% | 88 10% | 82 3% | 78 -2% |
Black Level * | 0.355 | 0.51 -44% | 0.33 7% | 0.52 -46% | 0.46 -30% | 0.46 -30% |
Contrast | 620 | 482 -22% | 1092 76% | 394 -36% | 493 -20% | 500 -19% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 10.36 | 11 -6% | 4.13 60% | 11.15 -8% | 10.88 -5% | 10.36 -0% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 18.91 | 32.4 -71% | 8.15 57% | 19.08 -1% | 18.36 3% | 18.63 1% |
Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 12.49 | 11.6 7% | 5 60% | 12.62 -1% | 12.18 2% | 13.32 -7% |
Gamma | 2.3 96% | 1.91 115% | 2.23 99% | 2.38 92% | 2.58 85% | 2.54 87% |
CCT | 12808 51% | 11807 55% | 7532 86% | 14189 46% | 14446 45% | 14124 46% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 36 | 57.3 59% | 38 6% | 74 106% | 48 33% | |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 57 | 87.8 54% | 59 4% | 63 11% | 74 30% | |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated * | 4.6 | 3.8 | 2.98 | |||
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres) | -6% /
-11% | 8% /
37% | 2% /
-5% | 4% /
6% | 7% /
3% |
* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances
Temps de réponse de l'écran
↔ Temps de réponse noir à blanc | ||
---|---|---|
14 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées | ↗ 10 ms hausse | |
↘ 4 ms chute | ||
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 19 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (24.3 ms) de tous les appareils testés. | ||
↔ Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80% | ||
44 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées | ↗ 23 ms hausse | |
↘ 21 ms chute | ||
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (38.6 ms) de tous les appareils testés. |
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé | |||
En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9700 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
HP 250 G7 6HM85ES | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A | |
Lenovo Ideapad L340-17API-81LY0004GE | |
Lenovo V155-15API | |
MSI PL62 MX150 7300HQ | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3500U (131 - 147, n=18) | |
Average of class Office (20 - 230, n=618) | |
Chuwi LapBook Plus | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo Ideapad L340-17API-81LY0004GE | |
Lenovo V155-15API | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3500U (482 - 682, n=19) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A | |
MSI PL62 MX150 7300HQ | |
HP 250 G7 6HM85ES | |
Average of class Office (36 - 1410, n=626) | |
Chuwi LapBook Plus |
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (3316 - 4235, n=13) | |
Lenovo V155-15API | |
MSI PL62 MX150 7300HQ | |
Lenovo Ideapad L340-17API-81LY0004GE | |
HP 250 G7 6HM85ES | |
Average of class Office (1169 - 4770, n=465) | |
Chuwi LapBook Plus |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3524 points | |
PCMark 10 Score | 3713 points | |
Aide |
Lenovo V155-15API Union Memory RTOTJ128VGD3EYX | Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | Chuwi LapBook Plus Kimtigo KT256GM28S3 | HP 250 G7 6HM85ES WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | MSI PL62 MX150 7300HQ | Lenovo Ideapad L340-17API-81LY0004GE Samsung SSD PM871b MZ7LN256HAJQ | Average Union Memory RTOTJ128VGD3EYX | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 41% | 29% | 335% | -71% | 79% | 0% | 237% | |
Write 4K | 72.36 | 80.93 12% | 58.68 -19% | 179.3 148% | 7.507 -90% | 94.36 30% | 72.4 0% | 108 (0.217 - 248, n=233) 49% |
Read 4K | 27.84 | 28.23 1% | 13.04 -53% | 47.7 71% | 0.419 -98% | 32.45 17% | 27.8 0% | 37.7 (0.176 - 166, n=233) 35% |
Write Seq | 145.1 | 266.3 84% | 395.8 173% | 1265 772% | 113.7 -22% | 482.8 233% | 145 0% | 907 (21.4 - 3689, n=229) 525% |
Read Seq | 496 | 495.5 0% | 455.5 -8% | 1184 139% | 120.4 -76% | 524.4 6% | 496 0% | 1178 (74 - 4340, n=229) 138% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 129.6 | 255 97% | 81.34 -37% | 450.6 248% | 14.96 -88% | 232 79% | 130 0% | 306 (0.222 - 701, n=234) 136% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 200.9 | 288.3 44% | 92.06 -54% | 555.7 177% | 1.3 -99% | 253.6 26% | 201 0% | 327 (0.647 - 773, n=234) 63% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 146.4 | 265.6 81% | 476.8 226% | 1455 894% | 117.7 -20% | 496.5 239% | 146 0% | 1149 (56.5 - 4396, n=234) 685% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 522 | 555.5 6% | 546.5 5% | 1717 229% | 117.2 -78% | 540.3 4% | 522 0% | 1903 (78.6 - 6804, n=234) 265% |
AS SSD | 55% | -34% | 449% | 75% | 0% | 15% | ||
Copy Game MB/s | 169.9 | 161.96 | 528.39 | 184.93 | 392 (17.5 - 3007, n=293) | |||
Copy Program MB/s | 135.85 | 77.72 | 239.94 | 128.08 | 219 (12.8 - 1353, n=293) | |||
Copy ISO MB/s | 213.46 | 464.9 | 764.56 | 282.8 | 633 (21.1 - 3024, n=293) | |||
Score Total | 529 | 979 85% | 479 -9% | 3181 501% | 869 64% | 529 0% | 1582 (21 - 6629, n=438) 199% | |
Score Write | 148 | 295 99% | 195 32% | 1468 892% | 343 132% | 148 0% | 568 (8 - 2668, n=438) 284% | |
Score Read | 258 | 455 76% | 186 -28% | 1131 338% | 342 33% | 258 0% | 678 (6 - 2754, n=438) 163% | |
Access Time Write * | 0.132 | 0.226 -71% | 0.462 -250% | 0.024 82% | 0.061 54% | 0.132 -0% | 0.916 (0.018 - 34.1, n=466) -594% | |
Access Time Read * | 0.118 | 0.101 14% | 0.361 -206% | 0.046 61% | 0.085 28% | 0.118 -0% | 1.275 (0.025 - 32, n=459) -981% | |
4K-64 Write | 86.77 | 198.18 128% | 137.71 59% | 1190.32 1272% | 236.16 172% | 86.8 0% | 393 (0.23 - 2280, n=467) 353% | |
4K-64 Read | 186.46 | 374.11 101% | 139.41 -25% | 936.89 402% | 262.17 41% | 186 0% | 507 (0.34 - 2128, n=467) 172% | |
4K Write | 47.43 | 71.61 51% | 15.16 -68% | 143.9 203% | 59.84 26% | 47.4 0% | 81.8 (0.21 - 214, n=467) 72% | |
4K Read | 23.55 | 29.29 24% | 7.36 -69% | 46.26 96% | 29.14 24% | 23.6 0% | 32.6 (0.4 - 112, n=467) 38% | |
Seq Write | 135.76 | 254.59 88% | 419.36 209% | 1339.37 887% | 472.22 248% | 136 0% | 615 (41.5 - 3289, n=468) 353% | |
Seq Read | 480.79 | 513.41 7% | 391.5 -19% | 1476.64 207% | 489.89 2% | 481 0% | 1007 (42.5 - 5533, n=468) 109% | |
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres) | 48% /
49% | -3% /
-7% | 392% /
401% | -71% /
-71% | 77% /
77% | 0% /
0% | 126% /
109% |
* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
MSI PL62 MX150 7300HQ | |
Lenovo V155-15API | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (1668 - 4317, n=39) | |
Lenovo Ideapad L340-17API-81LY0004GE | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A | |
HP 250 G7 6HM85ES | |
Average of class Office (185 - 8296, n=738) | |
Chuwi LapBook Plus |
3DMark 11 Performance | 3861 points | |
Aide |
Dota 2 Reborn | |
1920x1080 high (2/3) | |
Lenovo V155-15API | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (26.9 - 47.8, n=24) | |
Average of class Office (5.5 - 88.6, n=113) | |
1366x768 med (1/3) | |
Lenovo V155-15API | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (46.8 - 76.3, n=24) | |
Average of class Office (9.7 - 121, n=121) | |
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest | |
Average of class Office (21.3 - 137, n=121) | |
Lenovo V155-15API | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (56.2 - 97.2, n=24) |
Bas | Moyen | Élevé | Ultra | ||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 70.8 | 61.2 | 38.1 | 35.4 | fps |
Degré de la nuisance sonore
Au repos |
| 29.8 / 29.8 / 29.8 dB(A) |
Fortement sollicité |
| 32.1 / 34.5 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silencieux 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) bruyant |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 36.5 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 29.4 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-7 °C / -12.6 F).
Lenovo V155-15API audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (62.13 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Éteint/en veille | ![]() ![]() |
Au repos | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fortement sollicité |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Légende:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing 1.3 | |
Average of class Office (105 - 1124, n=434) | |
Lenovo Ideapad L340-17API-81LY0004GE | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A | |
HP 250 G7 6HM85ES | |
Lenovo V155-15API | |
MSI PL62 MX150 7300HQ | |
Chuwi LapBook Plus |
Points positifs
Points négatifs
Verdict
Dans nos tests, le Lenovo V155 s’avère être un bon portable pour des exigences peu élevées. Son prix se reflète surtout dans son écran, et dans sa connectique. Les performances sont plus que suffisantes pour la bureautique, et le multimédia. Avec 4 Go de RAM, et 8 Go amovibles, la configuration de mémoire est assez inhabituelle, mais au moins elle s’avère suffisante. Ceux qui peuvent se passer d’un lecteur optique pourront à la place intégrer un gros disque dur.
Le Lenovo V155 est très abordable, et possède de bonnes performances avec son processeur AMD. Cependant son autonomie et son écran pourraient être meilleurs.
Par ailleurs, les périphériques d’entrée sont bons, et le WLAN moyen. Alors que l’autonomie aurait pu être meilleure, on peut quand même tenir quelques heures sans chargeur – il faut ici se souvenir du prix d’environ 500 €, pour lequel le Lenovo V155 propose des performances plutôt bonnes.
L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.
Lenovo V155-15API - 09/19/2019 v7
Mike Wobker