Notebookcheck

Courte critique du smartphone Blackview P10000 Pro

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Tanja Hinum (traduit par JBP), 06/09/2018

Le lapin Duracell au pays des smartphones. Malgré d’énormes batteries, les smartphones venus d’Extrême-Orient peinent souvent à convaincre en ce qui concerne l’autonomie, à cause d’une intégration peu réussie d’Android. Ce n’est pas le cas avec le Blackview P10000 Pro. Celui-ci possède de loin la plus grosse autonomie que nous n’ayons jamais rencontrée sur un smartphone.

Blackview P10000 Pro (P Gamme)
Carte graphique
ARM Mali-G71 MP2
Mémoire
4096 Mo 
Écran
6 pouces 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixel 402 PPP, capacitif, IPS, Sharp, brillant: oui
Disque dur
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 Go 
, 52 Go libres
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, Connectique audio: USB C, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: SDXC, 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: capteur de proximité, boussole, gyroscope, accéléromètre, OTG, Miracast, LED de statut
Réseau
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM : B2 / B3 / B5 / B8 (1 900 / 1 800 / 850 / 900 MHz), WCDMA: B1 / B8 (2 100 / 900 MHz), FDD LTE :B1 / B3 / B7 / B20 (2 100 / 1 800 / 2 600 / 900 / 800 MHz), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 14.7 x 165 x 77
Batterie
11000 mAh Lithium-Polymère, Autonomie de la batterie (selon les données du fabricant): 168 h, Autonomie de la batterie en communication 3G (selon les données du fabricant): 60 h
Système d'exploitation
Android 7.1 Nougat
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 16 MPix 16+0,3 MP
Appareil photo secondaire: 13 MPix 13+0,3 MP
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: Mono, Clavier: virtuel, Rétroéclairage du clavier: oui, adaptateur secteur modulaire, câble USB, adaptateur USB C vers micro USB, coque en silicone, Blackview UI, 12 Mois Garantie, fanless
Poids
298 g, Alimentation: 65 g
Prix
170 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparaison des tailles

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
278 MBit/s ∼100% +175%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=307)
211 MBit/s ∼76% +109%
Ulefone Power 3
Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
106 MBit/s ∼38% +5%
Sony Xperia L2
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 32 GB eMMC Flash
101 MBit/s ∼36% 0%
Blackview P10000 Pro
Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
101 MBit/s ∼36%
HTC Desire 12
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 32 GB eMMC Flash
61.06 MBit/s ∼22% -40%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
53.9 MBit/s ∼19% -47%
Oukitel K10
Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
53.4 MBit/s ∼19% -47%
Huawei P smart
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
51.7 MBit/s ∼19% -49%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
281 MBit/s ∼100% +158%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=307)
207 MBit/s ∼74% +90%
Blackview P10000 Pro
Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
109 MBit/s ∼39%
Ulefone Power 3
Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
99.1 MBit/s ∼35% -9%
Sony Xperia L2
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 32 GB eMMC Flash
92.4 MBit/s ∼33% -15%
HTC Desire 12
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 32 GB eMMC Flash
81.83 MBit/s ∼29% -25%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
55.7 MBit/s ∼20% -49%
Huawei P smart
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
50.3 MBit/s ∼18% -54%
Oukitel K10
Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
29.9 MBit/s ∼11% -73%
GPS Blackview P10000 Pro
GPS Blackview P10000 Pro
GPS Blackview P10000 Pro
GPS Blackview P10000 Pro
GPS Blackview P10000 Pro
GPS Blackview P10000 Pro
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
Blackview P10000 Pro - Détail d'une photo normale.
Détail d'une photo normale.
Blackview P10000 Pro - Zoom x2.
Zoom x2.
Blackview P10000 Pro - Mode HDR.
Mode HDR.
Blackview P10000 Pro - Mode normal.
Mode normal.
Blackview P10000 Pro - Photo avec...
Photo avec...
...effet Bokeh (Blackview P10000 Pro).
...effet Bokeh.

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Cliquer pour charger les images
527
cd/m²
532
cd/m²
527
cd/m²
530
cd/m²
513
cd/m²
503
cd/m²
490
cd/m²
471
cd/m²
471
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 532 cd/m² Moyenne: 507.1 cd/m² Minimum: 19.22 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 89 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 513 cd/m²
Contraste: 1386:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.5 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 10.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
Gamma: 2.29
Blackview P10000 Pro
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.99
HTC Desire 12
IPS, 1440x720, 5.5
Sony Xperia L2
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.2
Huawei P smart
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.65
Ulefone Power 3
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
Oukitel K10
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
Sony Xperia XZ2
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.7
Screen
18%
28%
-3%
28%
11%
19%
-13%
34%
Brightness middle
513
620
21%
502
-2%
393
-23%
448
-13%
573
12%
494
-4%
561
9%
630
23%
Brightness
507
612
21%
499
-2%
400
-21%
451
-11%
568
12%
485
-4%
541
7%
632
25%
Brightness Distribution
89
96
8%
84
-6%
93
4%
91
2%
89
0%
87
-2%
92
3%
96
8%
Black Level *
0.37
0.57
-54%
0.2
46%
0.55
-49%
0.63
-70%
0.33
11%
0.58
-57%
0.44
-19%
Contrast
1386
1088
-22%
2510
81%
715
-48%
910
-34%
1497
8%
967
-30%
1432
3%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
8.5
3.46
59%
5.4
36%
6.1
28%
2.7
68%
4.2
51%
5.1
40%
10
-18%
1.5
82%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
15.2
7.88
48%
10.8
29%
10.4
32%
9.8
36%
6.4
58%
9.9
35%
16.7
-10%
4.3
72%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
10.6
3.9
63%
6.2
42%
4.8
55%
1.6
85%
4.6
57%
3.5
67%
11.1
-5%
2.1
80%
Gamma
2.29 96%
2.073 106%
2.07 106%
2.01 109%
2.06 107%
2.24 98%
2.16 102%
1.8 122%
2.17 101%
CCT
10204 64%
7230 90%
7660 85%
7432 87%
6557 99%
7157 91%
7253 90%
9689 67%
6513 100%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 53 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 8933 (minimum : 43 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 6 ms hausse
↘ 12 ms chute
L'écran montre de très faibles temps de réponse, parfait pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (25.6 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 19.2 ms hausse
↘ 21.6 ms chute
L'écran montre de très faibles temps de réponse, parfait pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (41 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview P10000 Pro
73697 Points ∼28%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
76178 Points ∼29% +3%
HTC Desire 12
46366 Points ∼17% -37%
Sony Xperia L2
45193 Points ∼17% -39%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
61825 Points ∼23% -16%
Huawei P smart
87688 Points ∼33% +19%
Ulefone Power 3
54192 Points ∼20% -26%
Oukitel K10
54519 Points ∼20% -26%
Sony Xperia XZ2
266981 Points ∼100% +262%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (54192 - 83332, n=6)
71705 Points ∼27% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=170)
118332 Points ∼44% +61%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview P10000 Pro
5054 Points ∼63%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
4905 Points ∼61% -3%
HTC Desire 12
3320 Points ∼41% -34%
Sony Xperia L2
3429 Points ∼42% -32%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
3889 Points ∼48% -23%
Huawei P smart
4874 Points ∼60% -4%
Ulefone Power 3
4770 Points ∼59% -6%
Oukitel K10
4706 Points ∼58% -7%
Sony Xperia XZ2
8069 Points ∼100% +60%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (4622 - 5054, n=5)
4765 Points ∼59% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (3146 - 9868, n=256)
4551 Points ∼56% -10%
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview P10000 Pro
6846 Points ∼73%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
5801 Points ∼62% -15%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
5006 Points ∼54% -27%
Huawei P smart
5817 Points ∼62% -15%
Ulefone Power 3
6344 Points ∼68% -7%
Oukitel K10
6135 Points ∼66% -10%
Sony Xperia XZ2
9319 Points ∼100% +36%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (5909 - 6846, n=6)
6242 Points ∼67% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (6412 - 13531, n=423)
4958 Points ∼53% -28%
BaseMark OS II
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview P10000 Pro
771 Points ∼57%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
722 Points ∼54% -6%
HTC Desire 12
591 Points ∼44% -23%
Sony Xperia L2
787 Points ∼58% +2%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
737 Points ∼55% -4%
Huawei P smart
919 Points ∼68% +19%
Ulefone Power 3
829 Points ∼62% +8%
Oukitel K10
700 Points ∼52% -9%
Sony Xperia XZ2
1346 Points ∼100% +75%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (700 - 829, n=6)
771 Points ∼57% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=499)
698 Points ∼52% -9%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview P10000 Pro
931 Points ∼12%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
1017 Points ∼13% +9%
HTC Desire 12
18 Points ∼0% -98%
Sony Xperia L2
386 Points ∼5% -59%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
534 Points ∼7% -43%
Huawei P smart
857 Points ∼11% -8%
Ulefone Power 3
855 Points ∼11% -8%
Oukitel K10
855 Points ∼11% -8%
Sony Xperia XZ2
7868 Points ∼100% +745%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (855 - 931, n=6)
875 Points ∼11% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=499)
1737 Points ∼22% +87%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview P10000 Pro
1596 Points ∼73%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
961 Points ∼44% -40%
HTC Desire 12
984 Points ∼45% -38%
Sony Xperia L2
1121 Points ∼51% -30%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
1249 Points ∼57% -22%
Huawei P smart
1889 Points ∼86% +18%
Ulefone Power 3
1566 Points ∼71% -2%
Oukitel K10
1609 Points ∼73% +1%
Sony Xperia XZ2
2193 Points ∼100% +37%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (1128 - 1609, n=6)
1396 Points ∼64% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=499)
1244 Points ∼57% -22%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview P10000 Pro
3229 Points ∼38%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
3236 Points ∼39% 0%
HTC Desire 12
1526 Points ∼18% -53%
Sony Xperia L2
1498 Points ∼18% -54%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
2218 Points ∼26% -31%
Huawei P smart
3223 Points ∼38% 0%
Ulefone Power 3
2906 Points ∼35% -10%
Oukitel K10
2913 Points ∼35% -10%
Sony Xperia XZ2
8402 Points ∼100% +160%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (2543 - 3229, n=6)
2818 Points ∼34% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=499)
2512 Points ∼30% -22%
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview P10000 Pro
1370 Points ∼37%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
1229 Points ∼33% -10%
HTC Desire 12
637 Points ∼17% -54%
Sony Xperia L2
845 Points ∼23% -38%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
1022 Points ∼27% -25%
Huawei P smart
1480 Points ∼40% +8%
Ulefone Power 3
1340 Points ∼36% -2%
Oukitel K10
1294 Points ∼35% -6%
Sony Xperia XZ2
3738 Points ∼100% +173%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (1201 - 1370, n=6)
1271 Points ∼34% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=503)
1255 Points ∼34% -8%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview P10000 Pro
1469 Points ∼40%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
2038 Points ∼56% +39%
HTC Desire 12
589 Points ∼16% -60%
Sony Xperia L2
950 Points ∼26% -35%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
1727 Points ∼48% +18%
Huawei P smart
1827 Points ∼50% +24%
Ulefone Power 3
1240 Points ∼34% -16%
Oukitel K10
1257 Points ∼35% -14%
Sony Xperia XZ2
3630 Points ∼100% +147%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (1240 - 1594, n=6)
1447 Points ∼40% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2281 - 4216, n=352)
1642 Points ∼45% +12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview P10000 Pro
53 Points ∼1%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
379 Points ∼7% +615%
HTC Desire 12
92 Points ∼2% +74%
Sony Xperia L2
151 Points ∼3% +185%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
185 Points ∼4% +249%
Huawei P smart
256 Points ∼5% +383%
Ulefone Power 3
54 Points ∼1% +2%
Oukitel K10
56 Points ∼1% +6%
Sony Xperia XZ2
5122 Points ∼100% +9564%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (53 - 396, n=6)
216 Points ∼4% +308%
Average of class Smartphone (815 - 5241, n=352)
1186 Points ∼23% +2138%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview P10000 Pro
68 Points ∼1%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
463 Points ∼10% +581%
HTC Desire 12
113 Points ∼2% +66%
Sony Xperia L2
186 Points ∼4% +174%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
231 Points ∼5% +240%
Huawei P smart
316 Points ∼7% +365%
Ulefone Power 3
69 Points ∼1% +1%
Oukitel K10
71 Points ∼2% +4%
Sony Xperia XZ2
4693 Points ∼100% +6801%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (68 - 446, n=6)
257 Points ∼5% +278%
Average of class Smartphone (951 - 4734, n=360)
1134 Points ∼24% +1568%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview P10000 Pro
1456 Points ∼40%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
2058 Points ∼57% +41%
HTC Desire 12
593 Points ∼16% -59%
Sony Xperia L2
920 Points ∼25% -37%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
1685 Points ∼46% +16%
Huawei P smart
1787 Points ∼49% +23%
Ulefone Power 3
1237 Points ∼34% -15%
Oukitel K10
1200 Points ∼33% -18%
Sony Xperia XZ2
3642 Points ∼100% +150%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (1200 - 1575, n=6)
1428 Points ∼39% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 4215, n=384)
1540 Points ∼42% +6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview P10000 Pro
55 Points ∼1%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
732 Points ∼9% +1231%
HTC Desire 12
148 Points ∼2% +169%
Sony Xperia L2
238 Points ∼3% +333%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
277 Points ∼3% +404%
Huawei P smart
229 Points ∼3% +316%
Ulefone Power 3
57 Points ∼1% +4%
Oukitel K10
55 Points ∼1% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ2
8122 Points ∼100% +14667%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (55 - 582, n=6)
318 Points ∼4% +478%
Average of class Smartphone (46 - 8312, n=384)
1632 Points ∼20% +2867%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview P10000 Pro
71 Points ∼1%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
854 Points ∼13% +1103%
HTC Desire 12
178 Points ∼3% +151%
Sony Xperia L2
285 Points ∼4% +301%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
340 Points ∼5% +379%
Huawei P smart
284 Points ∼4% +300%
Ulefone Power 3
72 Points ∼1% +1%
Oukitel K10
70 Points ∼1% -1%
Sony Xperia XZ2
6378 Points ∼100% +8883%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (70 - 676, n=6)
373 Points ∼6% +425%
Average of class Smartphone (58 - 6454, n=392)
1387 Points ∼22% +1854%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview P10000 Pro
7733 Points ∼22%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
15593 Points ∼43% +102%
HTC Desire 12
9856 Points ∼27% +27%
Sony Xperia L2
10937 Points ∼31% +41%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
12605 Points ∼35% +63%
Huawei P smart
14930 Points ∼42% +93%
Ulefone Power 3
Points ∼0% -100%
Oukitel K10
6847 Points ∼19% -11%
Sony Xperia XZ2
35856 Points ∼100% +364%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (7733 - 10988, n=6)
7673 Points ∼21% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (3958 - 37475, n=539)
12880 Points ∼36% +67%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview P10000 Pro
10997 Points ∼14%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
13219 Points ∼16% +20%
HTC Desire 12
3597 Points ∼4% -67%
Sony Xperia L2
5960 Points ∼7% -46%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
7484 Points ∼9% -32%
Huawei P smart
11262 Points ∼14% +2%
Ulefone Power 3
Points ∼0% -100%
Oukitel K10
9862 Points ∼12% -10%
Sony Xperia XZ2
80233 Points ∼100% +630%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (10735 - 11269, n=6)
9011 Points ∼11% -18%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 162695, n=539)
17994 Points ∼22% +64%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview P10000 Pro
10054 Points ∼16%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
13682 Points ∼22% +36%
HTC Desire 12
4188 Points ∼7% -58%
Sony Xperia L2
6631 Points ∼11% -34%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
8227 Points ∼13% -18%
Huawei P smart
11912 Points ∼19% +18%
Ulefone Power 3
Points ∼0% -100%
Oukitel K10
8983 Points ∼14% -11%
Sony Xperia XZ2
62926 Points ∼100% +526%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (10054 - 11148, n=6)
8638 Points ∼14% -14%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=540)
15114 Points ∼24% +50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview P10000 Pro
21 fps ∼14%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
23 fps ∼15% +10%
HTC Desire 12
5.9 fps ∼4% -72%
Sony Xperia L2
11 fps ∼7% -48%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
12 fps ∼8% -43%
Huawei P smart
19 fps ∼13% -10%
Ulefone Power 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Oukitel K10
22 fps ∼15% +5%
Sony Xperia XZ2
150 fps ∼100% +614%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (21 - 22, n=6)
18 fps ∼12% -14%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=564)
31.4 fps ∼21% +50%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview P10000 Pro
20 fps ∼33%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
17 fps ∼28% -15%
HTC Desire 12
9.7 fps ∼16% -51%
Sony Xperia L2
19 fps ∼32% -5%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
20 fps ∼33% 0%
Huawei P smart
18 fps ∼30% -10%
Ulefone Power 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Oukitel K10
21 fps ∼35% +5%
Sony Xperia XZ2
60 fps ∼100% +200%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (20 - 34, n=6)
19.5 fps ∼33% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=567)
25 fps ∼42% +25%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview P10000 Pro
11 fps ∼13%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
9.9 fps ∼12% -10%
HTC Desire 12
2.7 fps ∼3% -75%
Sony Xperia L2
4.1 fps ∼5% -63%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
5.1 fps ∼6% -54%
Huawei P smart
8.7 fps ∼11% -21%
Ulefone Power 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Oukitel K10
10 fps ∼12% -9%
Sony Xperia XZ2
82 fps ∼100% +645%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (10 - 11, n=6)
8.5 fps ∼10% -23%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 132, n=486)
16.8 fps ∼20% +53%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview P10000 Pro
10 fps ∼17%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
9.4 fps ∼16% -6%
HTC Desire 12
5.4 fps ∼9% -46%
Sony Xperia L2
8.8 fps ∼15% -12%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
10 fps ∼17% 0%
Huawei P smart
8.3 fps ∼14% -17%
Ulefone Power 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Oukitel K10
10 fps ∼17% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ2
59 fps ∼100% +490%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (10 - 20, n=6)
10 fps ∼17% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=489)
16 fps ∼27% +60%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview P10000 Pro
6.9 fps ∼12%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
6.5 fps ∼11% -6%
HTC Desire 12
1.6 fps ∼3% -77%
Sony Xperia L2
2.6 fps ∼4% -62%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
3.2 fps ∼5% -54%
Huawei P smart
5.3 fps ∼9% -23%
Ulefone Power 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Oukitel K10
6.5 fps ∼11% -6%
Sony Xperia XZ2
60 fps ∼100% +770%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (6.6 - 6.9, n=6)
5.53 fps ∼9% -20%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 88, n=349)
14.3 fps ∼24% +107%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview P10000 Pro
7.1 fps ∼13%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
6.2 fps ∼11% -13%
HTC Desire 12
3.5 fps ∼6% -51%
Sony Xperia L2
6.3 fps ∼11% -11%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
7.4 fps ∼13% +4%
Huawei P smart
5.2 fps ∼9% -27%
Ulefone Power 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Oukitel K10
6.2 fps ∼11% -13%
Sony Xperia XZ2
55 fps ∼100% +675%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (6.3 - 14, n=6)
6.65 fps ∼12% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (9.8 - 110, n=352)
13.9 fps ∼25% +96%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview P10000 Pro
4 fps ∼11%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
3.5 fps ∼10% -12%
HTC Desire 12
0.91 fps ∼3% -77%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
1.9 fps ∼5% -52%
Huawei P smart
3.2 fps ∼9% -20%
Ulefone Power 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Oukitel K10
3.7 fps ∼11% -7%
Sony Xperia XZ2
35 fps ∼100% +775%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (3.5 - 4, n=6)
3.13 fps ∼9% -22%
Average of class Smartphone (6.3 - 54, n=280)
9.86 fps ∼28% +147%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Blackview P10000 Pro
4.1 fps ∼12%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
3.4 fps ∼10% -17%
HTC Desire 12
1.5 fps ∼5% -63%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
3.7 fps ∼11% -10%
Huawei P smart
2.9 fps ∼9% -29%
Ulefone Power 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Oukitel K10
3.6 fps ∼11% -12%
Sony Xperia XZ2
33 fps ∼100% +705%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (3.8 - 7.7, n=6)
3.85 fps ∼12% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 58, n=283)
8.89 fps ∼27% +117%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (Classer selon les valeurs)
Ulefone Power 3
4.99 fps ∼41%
Oukitel K10
5.25 fps ∼43%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (4.99 - 5.25, n=2)
5.12 fps ∼42%
Average of class Smartphone (1.06 - 38.7, n=72)
12.1 fps ∼100%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Ulefone Power 3
242 Points ∼35%
Oukitel K10
242 Points ∼35%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (242 - 242, n=2)
242 Points ∼35%
Average of class Smartphone (36.3 - 2754, n=76)
693 Points ∼100%

Légende

 
Blackview P10000 Pro Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, ARM Mali-G71 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC Desire 12 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia L2 Mediatek MT6737T, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP1, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P smart HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Ulefone Power 3 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, ARM Mali-G71 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Oukitel K10 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, ARM Mali-G71 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia XZ2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)
89.54 Points ∼100% +401%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=422)
36.7 Points ∼41% +105%
Huawei P smart (Chrome 64)
26.63 Points ∼30% +49%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos (Samsung Browser 5.4)
26.37 Points ∼29% +48%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)
23.097 Points ∼26% +29%
Ulefone Power 3 (Standardbrowser 7.1.1)
22.91 Points ∼26% +28%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (17.9 - 23.1, n=6)
21.4 Points ∼24% +20%
Oukitel K10 (Standard Browser 7.1.1)
19.84 Points ∼22% +11%
Sony Xperia L2
18.363 Points ∼21% +3%
Blackview P10000 Pro (Chrome 66)
17.876 Points ∼20%
HTC Desire 12 (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)
15.791 Points ∼18% -12%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)
16774 Points ∼100% +387%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=558)
5562 Points ∼33% +62%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos (Samsung Browser 5.4)
4968 Points ∼30% +44%
Huawei P smart (Chrome 64)
4497 Points ∼27% +31%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)
4424 Points ∼26% +28%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (3051 - 4233, n=6)
3618 Points ∼22% +5%
Blackview P10000 Pro (Chrome 66)
3443 Points ∼21%
Ulefone Power 3 (Standardbrowser 7.1.1)
3155 Points ∼19% -8%
Oukitel K10 (Standard Browser 7.1.1)
3051 Points ∼18% -11%
Sony Xperia L2
2976 Points ∼18% -14%
HTC Desire 12 (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)
2930 Points ∼17% -15%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Ulefone Power 3 (Standardbrowser 7.1.1)
23714.1 ms * ∼100% -85%
Oukitel K10 (Standard Browser 7.1.1)
22892.5 ms * ∼97% -79%
HTC Desire 12 (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)
17134 ms * ∼72% -34%
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T (11755 - 23714, n=6)
16172 ms * ∼68% -26%
Blackview P10000 Pro (Chrome 66)
12786.8 ms * ∼54%
Sony Xperia L2
12434.9 ms * ∼52% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=578)
11474 ms * ∼48% +10%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)
10895 ms * ∼46% +15%
Huawei P smart (Chrome 64)
9698.2 ms * ∼41% +24%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos (Samsung Browser 5.4)
6784.4 ms * ∼29% +47%
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)
2394.3 ms * ∼10% +81%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Blackview P10000 ProXiaomi Redmi 5 PlusHTC Desire 12Sony Xperia L2Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) DuosHuawei P smartUlefone Power 3Oukitel K10Sony Xperia XZ2Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
28%
-24%
-39%
-31%
29%
41%
38%
86%
18%
-12%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
73.33 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
59.46
-19%
61.06 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-17%
52.77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-28%
44.21 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-40%
72.36 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
71.87 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
74.66 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
30.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-59%
54.3 (14.1 - 74.7, n=68)
-26%
45.6 (3.4 - 87.1, n=319)
-38%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
80.93 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
84.38
4%
81.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
70.57 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-13%
72.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-11%
82.26 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
81.82 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
82.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
34.25 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-58%
73.2 (21.1 - 86.9, n=68)
-10%
63.8 (8.2 - 96.5, n=319)
-21%
Random Write 4KB
14.6
7.1
-51%
7.54
-48%
8.99
-38%
9.9
-32%
21.3
46%
21.25
46%
22.88
57%
17
16%
19.8 (3.4 - 87.1, n=78)
36%
16.1 (0.14 - 164, n=607)
10%
Random Read 4KB
29.98
79.5
165%
16.69
-44%
22.32
-26%
24.07
-20%
66.11
121%
61.38
105%
52.15
74%
149.4
398%
50.3 (11.4 - 149, n=78)
68%
38.3 (1.59 - 173, n=607)
28%
Sequential Write 256KB
112.3
194.5
73%
103.77
-8%
52.77
-53%
51.96
-54%
121.07
8%
214.88
91%
213.25
90%
198.7
77%
164 (40 - 246, n=78)
46%
79.9 (2.99 - 246, n=607)
-29%
Sequential Read 256KB
284.33
270
-5%
211.38
-26%
70.57
-75%
204.45
-28%
269.36
-5%
294.58
4%
291.53
3%
679.2
139%
269 (115 - 704, n=78)
-5%
230 (12.1 - 895, n=607)
-19%
 39.1 °C39.1 °C42.1 °C 
 40.1 °C38.8 °C43.2 °C 
 39.5 °C39 °C42.2 °C 
Maximum: 43.2 °C
Moyenne: 40.3 °C
33.9 °C35.9 °C37.6 °C
36 °C36 °C37.7 °C
34.7 °C36.1 °C37.5 °C
Maximum: 37.7 °C
Moyenne: 36.2 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  32.9 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.7 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.241.42532.944.23137.241.24031.739.85039.640.56328.330.88027.329.110026.928.412526.730.21602427.120020.931.425020.938.931519.548.340018.559.250017.565.163017.568.480015.772.2100015.875.6125016.674.3160015.872.9200015.471.7250015.572.531501672400015.880.350001679.9630016.367.9800016.358.11000016.251.91250016.449.21600016.448.3SPL28.686.5N1.163.1median 16.4median 65.1Delta2.114.235.241.232.936.637.235.331.735.739.635.228.328.427.327.326.930.126.729.12427.820.931.520.939.819.54718.554.417.558.817.564.415.769.215.87216.671.715.87215.473.415.573.41675.615.880.8168216.374.116.369.816.26716.475.216.458.728.687.61.164.9median 16.4median 69.22.112.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseBlackview P10000 ProOukitel K10
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Blackview P10000 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Oukitel K10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0 / 0.09 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 0.63 / 2.2 / 2.3 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 3.57 / 5.82 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Blackview P10000 Pro
11000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
4000 mAh
HTC Desire 12
2730 mAh
Sony Xperia L2
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
3000 mAh
Huawei P smart
3000 mAh
Ulefone Power 3
6080 mAh
Oukitel K10
11000 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ2
3180 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-26%
-8%
31%
43%
1%
15%
-6%
-20%
-0%
-3%
Idle Minimum *
0.63
0.7
-11%
1.13
-79%
0.5
21%
0.52
17%
0.62
2%
0.79
-25%
0.89
-41%
0.72
-14%
0.857 (0.63 - 1.08, n=6)
-36%
0.88 (0.2 - 3.4, n=637)
-40%
Idle Average *
2.2
2.8
-27%
2.03
8%
1.12
49%
1.17
47%
1.76
20%
1.82
17%
2.48
-13%
2.21
-0%
2.12 (1.65 - 2.51, n=6)
4%
1.719 (0.6 - 6.2, n=636)
22%
Idle Maximum *
2.3
3.4
-48%
2.05
11%
1.25
46%
1.24
46%
1.87
19%
1.87
19%
2.52
-10%
2.22
3%
2.17 (1.71 - 2.53, n=6)
6%
1.997 (0.74 - 6.6, n=637)
13%
Load Average *
3.57
4.2
-18%
3.68
-3%
2.92
18%
1.66
54%
4.47
-25%
2.7
24%
3.13
12%
4.6
-29%
3.23 (2.7 - 4.28, n=6)
10%
4.04 (0.8 - 10.8, n=631)
-13%
Load Maximum *
5.82
7.2
-24%
4.52
22%
4.66
20%
2.94
49%
6.39
-10%
3.62
38%
4.5
23%
9.34
-60%
4.92 (3.62 - 6.73, n=6)
15%
5.75 (1.2 - 14.2, n=631)
1%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
35h 49min
Blackview P10000 Pro
11000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
4000 mAh
HTC Desire 12
2730 mAh
Sony Xperia L2
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
3000 mAh
Huawei P smart
3000 mAh
Ulefone Power 3
6080 mAh
Oukitel K10
11000 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ2
3180 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie
WiFi v1.3
2149
497
-77%
440
-80%
690
-68%
738
-66%
565
-74%
1376
-36%
1632
-24%
679
-68%

Points positifs

+ très bonne autonomie
+ écran IPS lumineux
+ GPS précis
+ stockage 64 Go

Points négatifs

- mauvais haut-parleur
- grand
- lourd
En test : le Blackview P10000 Pro. Modèle de test fourni par Blackview.
En test : le Blackview P10000 Pro. Modèle de test fourni par Blackview.

Le Blackview P10000 Pro tient sa promesse d’une autonomie énorme. Mais avec sa batterie de 11 000 mAh, le smartphone de 300 g est très encombrant : son châssis de 1,5 cm d’épaisseur peut être rédhibitoire pour bien des acheteurs.

Mais cela mis à part, le Blackview P10000 Pro est équipé d’un écran très bien contrasté, d’un GPS précis, d’un appareil photo tout à fait honnête, et de performances suffisantes. Cependant, le haut-parleur n’est pas très bon, et l’appareil aurait pu être un peu plus fluide.

Par rapport au concurrent principal, l’Oukitel K10, le P10000 Pro est meilleur dans presque tous les domaines (GPS, WLAN, écran, performances). Et il tient presque 500 minutes de plus dans notre test WLAN grâce à sa batterie.

Vu les dimensions du Blackview P10000 Pro et son poids comparable à celui d’une tablette de 7 pouces, il est difficile de recommander l’appareil. Cependant, ceux qui ont besoin d’une autonomie défiant tout concurrence seront pleinement satisfaits du smartphone Blackview.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Blackview P10000 Pro - 05/26/2018 v6
Marcus Herbrich

Châssis
82%
Clavier
69 / 75 → 92%
Dispositif de pointage
89%
Connectivité
43 / 60 → 71%
Poids
86%
Autonomie
100%
Écran
81%
Performances en jeu
19 / 63 → 30%
Performances dans les applications
49 / 70 → 69%
Chauffe
85%
Nuisance sonore
100%
Audio
56 / 91 → 62%
Appareil photo
70%
Moyenne
71%
81%
Smartphone - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Courte critique du smartphone Blackview P10000 Pro
Marcus Herbrich, 2018-06- 9 (Update: 2018-06- 9)