Test de l'Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL (i7-10510U, MX250, FHD) : PC portable coloré et robuste
Note | Date | Modèle | Poids | Épaisseur | Taille | Résolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
81 % | 08/20 | Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T i7-10510U, GeForce MX250 | 1.4 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
87 % | 06/20 | Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ R7 4700U, Vega 7 | 1.2 kg | 16.55 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
86 % | 05/20 | Schenker VIA 14 i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.1 kg | 16.5 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
78 % | 02/20 | HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng i7-1065G7, GeForce MX250 | 1.6 kg | 18 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
Top 10
» Le Top 10 des PC portables multimédia
» Le Top 10 des PC portables de jeu
» Le Top 10 des PC portables de jeu légers
» Le Top 10 des ordinateurs portables bureautiques
» Le Top 10 des PC portables bureautiques premium/professionnels
» Le Top 10 des Stations de travail mobiles
» Le Top 10 des Ultraportables
» Le Top 10 des Ultrabooks
» Le Top 10 des Convertibles
» Le Top 10 des Tablettes
» Le Top 10 des Tablettes Windows
» Le Top 10 des Smartphones
» Le Top 10 des PC Portables á moins de 300 euros
» Le Top 10 des PC Portables á moins de 500 euros
» Le Top 25 des meilleurs écrans d'ordinateurs
Comparaison des tailles
Port configuration
SDCardreader Transfer Speed | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Schenker VIA 14 | |
Average of class Multimedia (11.2 - 222, n=224) | |
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Schenker VIA 14 (Toshiba Exceria pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Multimedia (10.2 - 253, n=220) | |
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) |
Networking | |
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Schenker VIA 14 | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (289 - 1722, n=171) | |
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T | |
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Schenker VIA 14 | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (49.8 - 1775, n=171) | |
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T |

|
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 68 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 216 cd/m²
Contraste: 1419:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.155 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.23 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7, calibrated: 4.4
ΔE Greyscale 3.77 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
62% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 40% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.35
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T Chi Mei CMN14D4, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AU Optronics B140HAN04.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Schenker VIA 14 B140HAN06.2, a-Si AHVA-IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14.00 | HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng AUO543D, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Response Times | -13% | -63% | -51% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 34 (16, 18) | 41 (19, 22) -21% | 60.8 (28.4, 32.4) -79% | 60.8 (29.2, 31.6) -79% |
Response Time Black / White * | 24 (14, 10) | 25 (14, 11) -4% | 35.2 (17.2, 18) -47% | 29.6 (13.2, 16.4) -23% |
PWM Frequency | 250 (20) | |||
Screen | 3% | 44% | 27% | |
Brightness middle | 220 | 269 22% | 335 52% | 395 80% |
Brightness | 204 | 244 20% | 309 51% | 375 84% |
Brightness Distribution | 68 | 83 22% | 84 24% | 91 34% |
Black Level * | 0.155 | 0.23 -48% | 0.17 -10% | 0.26 -68% |
Contrast | 1419 | 1170 -18% | 1971 39% | 1519 7% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 5.23 | 4.94 6% | 2.3 56% | 5.92 -13% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 21.51 | 20.37 5% | 5 77% | 9.79 54% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated * | 4.4 | 5.03 -14% | 1 77% | 0.91 79% |
Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 3.77 | 1.71 55% | 3.9 -3% | 6.69 -77% |
Gamma | 2.35 94% | 2.52 87% | 2.19 100% | 2.78 79% |
CCT | 6666 98% | 6535 99% | 6556 99% | 7596 86% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 40 | 35 -12% | 65.5 64% | 63 58% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 62 | 56 -10% | 99.6 61% | 98 58% |
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres) | -5% /
0% | -10% /
28% | -12% /
15% |
* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances
Temps de réponse de l'écran
↔ Temps de réponse noir à blanc | ||
---|---|---|
24 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées | ↗ 14 ms hausse | |
↘ 10 ms chute | ||
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont similaires à la moyenne (24.3 ms) de tous les appareils testés. | ||
↔ Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80% | ||
34 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées | ↗ 16 ms hausse | |
↘ 18 ms chute | ||
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 28 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (38.6 ms) de tous les appareils testés. |
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) décelé | 250 Hz | ≤ 20 Niveau de luminosité | |
Le rétroéclairage de l'écran scintille à la fréquence de 250 Hz (certainement du fait de l'utilisation d'une MDI - Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) à un niveau de luminosité inférieur ou égal à 20 % . Aucun scintillement ne devrait être perceptible au-dessus de cette valeur. La fréquence de rafraîchissement de 250 Hz est relativement faible, les personnes les plus sensibles devraient percevoir un scintillement et être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire accrue (avec le niveau de luminosité indiqué) En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9686 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active. |
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T | |
Average of class Multimedia (62.6 - 585, n=81) | |
Average Intel Core i7-10510U (362 - 497, n=35) | |
Schenker VIA 14 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
Average of class Multimedia (148 - 4094, n=82) | |
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T | |
Average Intel Core i7-10510U (1015 - 1897, n=36) | |
Schenker VIA 14 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
Average Intel Core i7-10510U (113 - 202, n=40) | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T | |
Schenker VIA 14 | |
Average of class Multimedia (36 - 228, n=436) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
Schenker VIA 14 | |
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-10510U (482 - 856, n=43) | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T | |
Average of class Multimedia (72.4 - 1815, n=459) |
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU | |
Schenker VIA 14 | |
Average of class Multimedia (279 - 8394, n=67) | |
Average Intel Core i7-10510U (649 - 1051, n=29) | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T | |
Average of class Multimedia (1445 - 5412, n=64) | |
Average Intel Core i7-10510U (3747 - 4981, n=29) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
Schenker VIA 14 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
Average of class Multimedia (2492 - 47797, n=64) | |
Average Intel Core i7-10510U (12196 - 21298, n=29) | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T | |
Schenker VIA 14 |
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Average of class Multimedia (207 - 1586, n=55) | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T | |
Average Intel Core i7-10510U (977 - 1287, n=29) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
Schenker VIA 14 |
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Average of class Multimedia (392 - 8053, n=55) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
Schenker VIA 14 | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T | |
Average Intel Core i7-10510U (2474 - 4484, n=29) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
Average of class Multimedia (0.46 - 11.7, n=65) | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T | |
Average Intel Core i7-10510U (3.41 - 5.5, n=29) | |
Schenker VIA 14 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Average of class Multimedia (16.5 - 229, n=53) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
Average Intel Core i7-10510U (50.7 - 77.8, n=25) | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Average of class Multimedia (0.56 - 2.89, n=57) | |
Schenker VIA 14 | |
Average Intel Core i7-10510U (0.637 - 0.81, n=26) | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ |
* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances
PCMark 10 | |
Digital Content Creation | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
Average of class Multimedia (1001 - 9234, n=160) | |
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (2621 - 5547, n=11) | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T | |
Schenker VIA 14 | |
Productivity | |
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (6625 - 7972, n=11) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T | |
Average of class Multimedia (1407 - 8921, n=161) | |
Schenker VIA 14 | |
Essentials | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (8021 - 9764, n=11) | |
Schenker VIA 14 | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T | |
Average of class Multimedia (2891 - 10539, n=161) | |
Score | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (3861 - 5409, n=11) | |
Average of class Multimedia (1144 - 6514, n=162) | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T | |
Schenker VIA 14 |
PCMark 10 Score | 3933 points | |
Aide |
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Schenker VIA 14 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T |
* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H) | Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB | Schenker VIA 14 Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP1000GM30002 | HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 | Average Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H) | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 13% | 74% | 63% | -3% | -6% | |
Write 4K | 124.9 | 98.85 -21% | 201 61% | 181.6 45% | 116 (88 - 163, n=9) -7% | 108 (0.76 - 263, n=168) -14% |
Read 4K | 147.9 | 32.44 -78% | 60.17 -59% | 57.41 -61% | 137 (113 - 191, n=9) -7% | 38 (0.29 - 148, n=168) -74% |
Write Seq | 753 | 1582 110% | 2471 228% | 1982 163% | 520 (450 - 753, n=9) -31% | 1105 (64.8 - 4139, n=167) 47% |
Read Seq | 1223 | 1471 20% | 2104 72% | 1899 55% | 1370 (1223 - 1624, n=9) 12% | 1245 (65.9 - 4133, n=167) 2% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 369.2 | 375.4 2% | 323.6 -12% | 509.4 38% | 388 (237 - 556, n=9) 5% | 334 (0.84 - 1707, n=168) -10% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 358.1 | 491.9 37% | 551 54% | 544.7 52% | 364 (287 - 531, n=9) 2% | 370 (0.417 - 1015, n=168) 3% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 1057 | 1574 49% | 3407 222% | 3072 191% | 1178 (937 - 1320, n=9) 11% | 1356 (65.6 - 5187, n=168) 28% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 2738 | 2329 -15% | 3475 27% | 3281 20% | 2471 (2145 - 2738, n=9) -10% | 2039 (65.7 - 7117, n=168) -26% |
AS SSD | 37% | 215% | 166% | 1% | -484% | |
Score Total | 1581 | 1552 -2% | 5782 266% | 4568 189% | 1755 (1420 - 2594, n=9) 11% | 1817 (20 - 7069, n=280) 15% |
Score Write | 763 | 533 -30% | 2180 186% | 1853 143% | 818 (580 - 1117, n=9) 7% | 708 (7 - 2992, n=280) -7% |
Score Read | 544 | 682 25% | 2373 336% | 1801 231% | 624 (531 - 975, n=9) 15% | 749 (8 - 2825, n=280) 38% |
Access Time Write * | 0.046 | 0.034 26% | 0.022 52% | 0.03 35% | 0.0879 (0.045 - 0.151, n=9) -91% | 1.691 (0.019 - 34, n=308) -3576% |
Access Time Read * | 0.107 | 0.06 44% | 0.094 12% | 0.0829 (0.065 - 0.107, n=9) 23% | 2.08 (0.031 - 33, n=304) -1844% | |
4K-64 Write | 605.09 | 262.07 -57% | 1745.72 189% | 1456.46 141% | 666 (438 - 948, n=9) 10% | 496 (0.27 - 2716, n=314) -18% |
4K-64 Read | 386.2 | 454.71 18% | 2051.94 431% | 1473.01 281% | 456 (366 - 789, n=9) 18% | 547 (0.36 - 2209, n=314) 42% |
4K Write | 122.82 | 116.61 -5% | 172.28 40% | 147.5 20% | 112 (88 - 128, n=9) -9% | 76.6 (0.24 - 233, n=314) -38% |
4K Read | 62.4 | 31.56 -49% | 72.76 17% | 52.09 -17% | 65.7 (51.5 - 76, n=9) 5% | 30.5 (0.23 - 73.2, n=314) -51% |
Seq Write | 353.13 | 1547.44 338% | 2615.01 641% | 2493.03 606% | 402 (305 - 836, n=9) 14% | 712 (29.7 - 3886, n=314) 102% |
Seq Read | 957.04 | 1960.06 105% | 2487.9 160% | 2762.37 189% | 1025 (769 - 1241, n=9) 7% | 1079 (48.7 - 5529, n=314) 13% |
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres) | 25% /
26% | 145% /
156% | 115% /
123% | -1% /
-1% | -245% /
-283% |
* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances
Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T | |
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (3585 - 4942, n=29) | |
Average of class Multimedia (352 - 31866, n=696) | |
Schenker VIA 14 |
3DMark | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Average of class Multimedia (142 - 9323, n=117) | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T | |
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (881 - 1169, n=22) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
Schenker VIA 14 | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T | |
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (2939 - 3885, n=29) | |
Average of class Multimedia (337 - 23674, n=478) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
Schenker VIA 14 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 5022 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3460 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1282 points | |
Aide |
The Witcher 3 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Multimedia (2.9 - 92.1, n=146) | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (9 - 16, n=24) | |
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
Average of class Multimedia (3.8 - 168, n=157) | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (16.3 - 23.1, n=27) | |
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.2 - 243, n=150) | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (30 - 40, n=27) | |
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing | |
Average of class Multimedia (8.9 - 335, n=155) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (47.4 - 70, n=24) | |
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 high (2/3) | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T | |
Average of class Multimedia (15.5 - 139, n=91) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (8.6 - 77.4, n=20) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
Schenker VIA 14 |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
Average of class Multimedia (9.28 - 84.3, n=68) | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (9.8 - 52.6, n=16) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
Schenker VIA 14 |
Bas | Moyen | Élevé | Ultra | ||
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 36 | 21 | 13 | fps | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 102.4 | 90.5 | 71.3 | 63.8 | fps |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 47.7 | 42.8 | 39.3 | fps |
Degré de la nuisance sonore
Au repos |
| 31 / 31 / 31.3 dB(A) |
Fortement sollicité |
| 43.4 / 41.5 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silencieux 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) bruyant |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 36.6 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.8 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 31 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.2 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 31 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.2 °C / 91.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-4.3 °C / -7.8 F).
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.22 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.1% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Éteint/en veille | ![]() ![]() |
Au repos | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fortement sollicité |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Légende:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing 1.3 | |
Schenker VIA 14 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T | |
Average of class Multimedia (96 - 942, n=312) | |
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng |
Points positifs
Points négatifs
Verdict
L'Asus VivoBook S14 s'avère être un PC portable très stable. Ses performances sont plus que suffisantes pour la bureautique, et la Nvidia GeForce MX250 satisfera les joueurs occasionnels. Combinez cela à une bonne autonomie et à un châssis compact, et vous aurez un bon 14 pouces nomade.
L'Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL est un bon appareil polyvalent, qui possède de bonnes performances.
Seuls le lecteur de carte micro SD lent et le clavier, qui est un peu mou, peuvent être critiqués. Le reste est vraiment équilibré pour le prix. Cependant, on pourra être gêné par le léger coil whine quand l'adaptateur est branché, et par la MLI aux niveaux de luminosité les plus faibles. Ceux qui veulent un lecteur d'empreintes digitales devront se passer du pavé numérique - et inversement, ceux qui veulent un pavé numérique devront se passer du lecteur d'empreintes...
L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T - 07/20/2020 v7
Mike Wobker