Notebookcheck

Test de l'Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL (i7-10510U, MX250, FHD) : PC portable coloré et robuste

PC portable à la page. Asus propose un Vivobook S14 voyant, dans ne nombreux coloris, mais aussi costaud. De plus, les fonctionnalités sont nombreuses, mais partiellement exclusives mutuellement. Nous allons voir ce que l'appareil a dans le ventre.
Mike Wobker, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch (traduit par Prévots), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Comet Lake Laptop / Notebook Windows
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T (VivoBook S14 S433 Gamme)
Processeur
Intel Core i7-10510U 4 x 1.8 - 4.8 GHz, Comet Lake-U
Carte graphique
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 - 2048 Mo, Processeur: 1519 MHz, Mémoire: 1752 MHz, GP108 A1, NVIDIA 441.45, Intel UHD Graphics 620
Mémoire
16384 Mo 
, double canal
Écran
14.00 pouces 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPP, Chi Mei CMN14D4, IPS, brillant: non
Carte mère
Intel Comet Lake-U PCH-LP Premium
Disque dur
Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H), 512 Go 
, 420 Go libres
Carte son
Intel Comet Lake PCH-LP - cAVS
Connexions
2 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 HDMI, Connectique audio: jack, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: micro SD, 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales
Réseau
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.1
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 16 x 325 x 214
Batterie
50 Wh Lithium-Polymère
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Système d'exploitation
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Appareil photo
Webcam: 0,9 MP, 16:9 (1280 x 720)
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: 2 haut-parleurs, stéréo, Clavier: chiclet, Rétroéclairage du clavier: oui, ASUS Splendid, ASUS Tru2life Video, ASUS AudioWizard, 24 Mois Garantie
Poids
1.4 kg, Alimentation: 203 g
Prix
1100 euros
Liens
Asus Page d'accueil
Asus Section dédiée aux ordinateurs portables
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

, , , , , ,
relation de la recherche.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Note
Date
Modèle
Poids
Épaisseur
Taille
Résolution
Best Price
81 %
08/20
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
i7-10510U, GeForce MX250		1.4 kg16 mm14.00"1920x1080
87 %
06/20
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
R7 4700U, Vega 7		1.2 kg16.55 mm14.00"1920x1080
86 %
05/20
Schenker VIA 14
i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620		1.1 kg16.5 mm14.00"1920x1080
78 %
02/20
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
i7-1065G7, GeForce MX250		1.6 kg18 mm14.00"1920x1080
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T

Port configuration

Côté gauche : entrée secteur, HDMI, 1 USB A 3.2 Gen 1, 1 USB C 3.2 Gen 1, prise jack.
Côté gauche : entrée secteur, HDMI, 1 USB A 3.2 Gen 1, 1 USB C 3.2 Gen 1, prise jack.
Côté droit : lecteur de carte micro SD, 2 USB 2.0.
Côté droit : lecteur de carte micro SD, 2 USB 2.0.
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Multimedia
  (18.1 - 224, n=62, last 2 years)
82.5 MB/s ∼100% +251%
Schenker VIA 14
 
77.5 MB/s ∼94% +230%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
32 MB/s ∼39% +36%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
23.5 MB/s ∼28%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Multimedia
  (23.2 - 217, n=61, last 2 years)
93 MB/s ∼100% +268%
Schenker VIA 14
  (Toshiba Exceria pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
87.1 MB/s ∼94% +244%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
33 MB/s ∼35% +30%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
25.3 MB/s ∼27%
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker VIA 14
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1472 (1403min - 1492max) MBit/s ∼100% +137%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (49.8 - 1775, n=243)
1157 MBit/s ∼79% +86%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
928 MBit/s ∼63% +49%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
660 (642min - 680max) MBit/s ∼45% +6%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
621 (554min - 657max) MBit/s ∼42%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker VIA 14
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1532 (788min - 1670max) MBit/s ∼100% +75%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (136 - 1743, n=243)
1239 MBit/s ∼81% +42%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1070 MBit/s ∼70% +22%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
904 (879min - 923max) MBit/s ∼59% +3%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
875 (787min - 909max) MBit/s ∼57%
010020030040050060070080090010001100120013001400150016008829028828868757957878708878888959098868668958908808638688558758578938558758758779018858908898958839098889178799149209089029038929019049089189239219109079139029028889028999159089017881604161316071574159515151527154213511425145714571542138014411472162316251636167014951426155615391533142415911585157688290288288687579578787088788889590988686689589088086386885587585789385587587587790188589088989588390988891787991492090890290389290190490891892392191090791390290288890289991590890178816041613160715741595151515271542135114251457145715421380144114721623162516361670149514261556153915331424159115851576606595554657609613607614637589614631625630621631654630624624613620620613645630622635641638668669672662665657654660655643665654667663651661653653656652680654660671665649663642655669146414741448148814761472149014761445147614581465147914921469140314671456146414691483148614821483146414841487147914801476Tooltip
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø875 (787-909)
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø904 (879-923)
Schenker VIA 14 Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1506 (788-1670)
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø621 (554-657)
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø660 (642-680)
Schenker VIA 14 Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1471 (1403-1492)
ColorChecker
14.9 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
6 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T: 13.65 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 24.42 ∆E
201
cd/m²		236
cd/m²		238
cd/m²
187
cd/m²		220
cd/m²		217
cd/m²
163
cd/m²		195
cd/m²		177
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
Chi Mei CMN14D4
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 238 cd/m² Moyenne: 203.8 cd/m² Minimum: 12.1 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 68 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 216 cd/m²
Contraste: 1419:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.155 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.23 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6, calibrated: 4.4
ΔE Greyscale 3.77 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
62% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
42.99% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.02% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.55% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.35
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
Chi Mei CMN14D4, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00		Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AU Optronics B140HAN04.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00		Schenker VIA 14
B140HAN06.2, a-Si AHVA-IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14.00		HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
AUO543D, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
Display
-10%
65%
59%
Display P3 Coverage
41.55
37.2
-10%
69.75
68%
66.46
60%
sRGB Coverage
62.02
55.91
-10%
99.59
61%
98.4
59%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
42.99
38.43
-11%
71.57
66%
68.19
59%
Response Times
-13%
-63%
-51%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
34 (16, 18)
41 (19, 22)
-21%
60.8 (28.4, 32.4)
-79%
60.8 (29.2, 31.6)
-79%
Response Time Black / White *
24 (14, 10)
25 (14, 11)
-4%
35.2 (17.2, 18)
-47%
29.6 (13.2, 16.4)
-23%
PWM Frequency
250 (20)
Screen
3%
44%
27%
Brightness middle
220
269
22%
335
52%
395
80%
Brightness
204
244
20%
309
51%
375
84%
Brightness Distribution
68
83
22%
84
24%
91
34%
Black Level *
0.155
0.23
-48%
0.17
-10%
0.26
-68%
Contrast
1419
1170
-18%
1971
39%
1519
7%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.23
4.94
6%
2.3
56%
5.92
-13%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
21.51
20.37
5%
5
77%
9.79
54%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
4.4
5.03
-14%
1
77%
0.91
79%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.77
1.71
55%
3.9
-3%
6.69
-77%
Gamma
2.35 94%
2.52 87%
2.19 100%
2.78 79%
CCT
6666 98%
6535 99%
6556 99%
7596 86%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
40
35
-12%
65.5
64%
63
58%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
62
56
-10%
99.6
61%
98
58%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
-7% / -2%
15% / 35%
12% / 23%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Temps de réponse de l'écran

ℹ
Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
   ↔    Temps de réponse noir à blanc
24 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 14 ms hausse
↘ 10 ms chute
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 37 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont similaires à la moyenne (24 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
   ↔    Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
34 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 16 ms hausse
↘ 18 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 29 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (38.1 ms) de tous les appareils testés.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

ℹ
Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) décelé 250 Hz ≤ 20 Niveau de luminosité

Le rétroéclairage de l'écran scintille à la fréquence de 250 Hz (certainement du fait de l'utilisation d'une MDI - Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) à un niveau de luminosité inférieur ou égal à 20 % . Aucun scintillement ne devrait être perceptible au-dessus de cette valeur.

La fréquence de rafraîchissement de 250 Hz est relativement faible, les personnes les plus sensibles devraient percevoir un scintillement et être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire accrue (avec le niveau de luminosité indiqué)

En comparaison, 52 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 14793 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 2500000) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

055110165220275330385440495550605660715770825880935990642.12588.95535.78575.84564.91565.16569.18563.17568.54558.86567.29580.02575.21582.39567.79564.44575.99561.85546.48555.22547.52554.99557.42564.55554.111035.01931.75935.15936.02931.45935.06924.49934.95932.14930.93931.42915.54914.85922.38928.66931.66931.47932.44932.68931.79932.9932.05929.07932.42907.83922.62931.92932.73930.73929.39923.49927.6929.56932.68930.43929.97930.84935.39933.38932.51722639619607599592584579583578577577571578576569572570571566572573562562564567560568568561558569563564561565562560555560563556568564564559557558562558691626.47624.2625.31627.23626.53624.65626.69624.95624.05625.03624.42624.15628.37628.53623.76624.2627.23611.42592.25596.23625.09624.79625.37628.41624.22622.07622.83623.61627.91624.96626.85624.23627.4625.82624.18624.33625.74625.72625.22624.73625.56627.4626.44625.49623.83627.28625.78623.33627.44Tooltip
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T Intel Core i7-10510U, Intel Core i7-10510U: Ø568 (535.78-642.12)
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Ryzen 7 4700U: Ø932 (907.83-1035.01)
Schenker VIA 14 Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel Core i5-10210U: Ø574 (555-722)
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Core i7-1065G7: Ø625 (592.25-691)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
474 Points ∼100% +5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (311 - 589, n=86, last 2 years)
474 Points ∼100% +5%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
466 Points ∼98% +3%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
Intel Core i7-10510U
451 Points ∼95%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (362 - 497, n=35)
436 Points ∼92% -3%
Schenker VIA 14
Intel Core i5-10210U
395 Points ∼83% -12%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
2401 Points ∼100% +57%
Average of class Multimedia
  (727 - 4352, n=87, last 2 years)
2199 Points ∼92% +44%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
1543 Points ∼64% +1%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
Intel Core i7-10510U
1525 Points ∼64%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (1015 - 1897, n=36)
1410 Points ∼59% -8%
Schenker VIA 14
Intel Core i5-10210U
1150 Points ∼48% -25%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
190 Points ∼100% +7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (126 - 233, n=91, last 2 years)
187 Points ∼98% +5%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
180 Points ∼95% +1%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (113 - 202, n=40)
178 Points ∼94% 0%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
Intel Core i7-10510U
177.6 Points ∼93%
Schenker VIA 14
Intel Core i5-10210U
154 Points ∼81% -13%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
1035 Points ∼100% +61%
Average of class Multimedia
  (334 - 1846, n=102, last 2 years)
948 Points ∼92% +48%
Schenker VIA 14
Intel Core i5-10210U
722 (555min - 722max) Points ∼70% +12%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
691 Points ∼67% +8%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (482 - 856, n=43)
666 Points ∼64% +4%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
Intel Core i7-10510U
642 (535.78min - 642.12max) Points ∼62%
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU
Schenker VIA 14
Intel Core i5-10210U
1004 Seconds * ∼100% -28%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (649 - 1051, n=29)
804 Seconds * ∼80% -3%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
Intel Core i7-10510U
781.8 Seconds * ∼78%
Average of class Multimedia
  (261 - 1439, n=71, last 2 years)
561 Seconds * ∼56% +28%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
523.9 Seconds * ∼52% +33%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Multimedia
  (3406 - 5481, n=70, last 2 years)
4890 MIPS ∼100% +4%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
Intel Core i7-10510U
4681 MIPS ∼96%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (3747 - 4981, n=29)
4580 MIPS ∼94% -2%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
4292 MIPS ∼88% -8%
Schenker VIA 14
Intel Core i5-10210U
4282 MIPS ∼88% -9%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Multimedia
  (8984 - 51729, n=70, last 2 years)
27596 MIPS ∼100% +67%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
26652 MIPS ∼97% +62%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (12196 - 21298, n=29)
17635 MIPS ∼64% +7%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
Intel Core i7-10510U
16487 MIPS ∼60%
Schenker VIA 14
Intel Core i5-10210U
15424 MIPS ∼56% -6%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Multimedia
  (813 - 1586, n=66, last 2 years)
1288 Points ∼100% +6%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
Intel Core i7-10510U
1211 Points ∼94%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (977 - 1287, n=29)
1200 Points ∼93% -1%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
1101 Points ∼85% -9%
Schenker VIA 14
Intel Core i5-10210U
1089 Points ∼85% -10%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Multimedia
  (1604 - 8164, n=66, last 2 years)
5199 Points ∼100% +40%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
4792 Points ∼92% +29%
Schenker VIA 14
Intel Core i5-10210U
3831 Points ∼74% +3%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
Intel Core i7-10510U
3721 Points ∼72%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (2474 - 4484, n=29)
3677 Points ∼71% -1%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
7.81 fps ∼100% +70%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1.39 - 14.6, n=68, last 2 years)
7.33 fps ∼94% +59%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
Intel Core i7-10510U
4.6 fps ∼59%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (3.41 - 5.5, n=29)
4.58 fps ∼59% 0%
Schenker VIA 14
Intel Core i5-10210U
3.69 fps ∼47% -20%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
59.83 s * ∼100% -7%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (50.7 - 77.8, n=25)
59 s * ∼99% -6%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
Intel Core i7-10510U
55.76 s * ∼93%
Average of class Multimedia
  (16.5 - 99.2, n=67, last 2 years)
55.2 s * ∼92% +1%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Schenker VIA 14
Intel Core i5-10210U
0.712 sec * ∼100% -12%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U
  (0.637 - 0.81, n=26)
0.681 sec * ∼96% -7%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
Intel Core i7-10510U
0.638 sec * ∼90%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.552 - 1.002, n=67, last 2 years)
0.633 sec * ∼89% +1%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
0.629 sec * ∼88% +1%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
177.6 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
642 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
75.36 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.62 %
Aide
PCMark 10
Score
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
4886 Points ∼56% +24%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3028 - 6706, n=84, last 2 years)
4781 Points ∼54% +22%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
GeForce MX250, i7-1065G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
4289 Points ∼49% +9%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (3861 - 5409, n=11)
4243 Points ∼48% +8%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
3933 Points ∼45%
Schenker VIA 14
UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP1000GM30002
3810 Points ∼43% -3%
Essentials
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
9244 Points ∼80% +11%
Average of class Multimedia
  (6441 - 10539, n=83, last 2 years)
8949 Points ∼78% +8%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
GeForce MX250, i7-1065G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
8912 Points ∼77% +7%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (8021 - 9764, n=11)
8892 Points ∼77% +7%
Schenker VIA 14
UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP1000GM30002
8791 Points ∼76% +6%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
8310 Points ∼72%
Productivity
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
GeForce MX250, i7-1065G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
7433 Points ∼67% +9%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (6625 - 7972, n=11)
7331 Points ∼66% +7%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
7273 Points ∼65% +6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5448 - 9662, n=83, last 2 years)
7209 Points ∼65% +5%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
6845 Points ∼61%
Schenker VIA 14
UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP1000GM30002
6450 Points ∼58% -6%
Digital Content Creation
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
4709 Points ∼30% +62%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2148 - 9415, n=83, last 2 years)
4699 Points ∼30% +62%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
GeForce MX250, i7-1065G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
3233 Points ∼21% +11%
Average Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (2621 - 5547, n=11)
3225 Points ∼21% +11%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
2903 Points ∼19%
Schenker VIA 14
UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP1000GM30002
2649 Points ∼17% -9%
PCMark 10 Score
3933 points
Aide
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Schenker VIA 14
UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP1000GM30002
2339 μs * ∼100% -308%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB
1086.5 μs * ∼46% -90%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
573 μs * ∼24%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)		Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB		Schenker VIA 14
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP1000GM30002		HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02		Average Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
 		Average of class Multimedia
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
13%
74%
63%
-3%
32%
Write 4K
124.9
98.85
-21%
201
61%
181.6
45%
111 (64.8 - 163, n=10)
-11%
140 (55.5 - 263, n=81, last 2 years)
12%
Read 4K
147.9
32.44
-78%
60.17
-59%
57.41
-61%
133 (98 - 191, n=10)
-10%
50.9 (16.2 - 148, n=81, last 2 years)
-66%
Write Seq
753
1582
110%
2471
228%
1982
163%
567 (450 - 994, n=10)
-25%
1670 (214 - 4139, n=80, last 2 years)
122%
Read Seq
1223
1471
20%
2104
72%
1899
55%
1377 (1223 - 1624, n=10)
13%
1742 (435 - 4133, n=80, last 2 years)
42%
Write 4K Q32T1
369.2
375.4
2%
323.6
-12%
509.4
38%
393 (237 - 556, n=10)
6%
422 (158 - 697, n=81, last 2 years)
14%
Read 4K Q32T1
358.1
491.9
37%
551
54%
544.7
52%
367 (287 - 531, n=10)
2%
455 (220 - 767, n=81, last 2 years)
27%
Write Seq Q32T1
1057
1574
49%
3407
222%
3072
191%
1186 (937 - 1320, n=10)
12%
2120 (211 - 5187, n=81, last 2 years)
101%
Read Seq Q32T1
2738
2329
-15%
3475
27%
3281
20%
2474 (2145 - 2738, n=10)
-10%
2842 (390 - 7117, n=81, last 2 years)
4%
AS SSD
37%
215%
166%
4%
83%
Seq Read
957.04
1960.06
105%
2487.9
160%
2762.37
189%
1056 (769 - 1337, n=10)
10%
2040 (341 - 5529, n=81, last 2 years)
113%
Seq Write
353.13
1547.44
338%
2615.01
641%
2493.03
606%
427 (305 - 836, n=10)
21%
1524 (134 - 3886, n=81, last 2 years)
332%
4K Read
62.4
31.56
-49%
72.76
17%
52.09
-17%
65.3 (51.5 - 76, n=10)
5%
47.4 (15.9 - 73.2, n=81, last 2 years)
-24%
4K Write
122.82
116.61
-5%
172.28
40%
147.5
20%
111 (88 - 128, n=10)
-10%
127 (39.9 - 261, n=81, last 2 years)
3%
4K-64 Read
386.2
454.71
18%
2051.94
431%
1473.01
281%
467 (366 - 789, n=10)
21%
1040 (155 - 2209, n=81, last 2 years)
169%
4K-64 Write
605.09
262.07
-57%
1745.72
189%
1456.46
141%
675 (438 - 948, n=10)
12%
1210 (56.6 - 2512, n=81, last 2 years)
100%
Access Time Read *
0.107
0.06
44%
0.094
12%
0.0825 (0.065 - 0.107, n=10)
23%
0.0699 (0.032 - 0.181, n=76, last 2 years)
35%
Access Time Write *
0.046
0.034
26%
0.022
52%
0.03
35%
0.0837 (0.045 - 0.151, n=10)
-82%
0.1223 (0.019 - 1.075, n=81, last 2 years)
-166%
Score Read
544
682
25%
2373
336%
1801
231%
638 (531 - 975, n=10)
17%
1292 (223 - 2825, n=81, last 2 years)
138%
Score Write
763
533
-30%
2180
186%
1853
143%
829 (580 - 1117, n=10)
9%
1489 (136 - 2923, n=81, last 2 years)
95%
Score Total
1581
1552
-2%
5782
266%
4568
189%
1787 (1420 - 2594, n=10)
13%
3425 (490 - 7069, n=81, last 2 years)
117%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
25% / 26%
145% / 156%
115% / 123%
1% / 1%
58% / 61%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2738 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1057 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 358.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 369.2 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1223 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 753 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 147.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 124.9 MB/s

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

075150225300375450525600675750825900975105011251200127513501425829.651433.821433.891433.891433.891434.871435.151435.51435.571435.771435.771435.771435.771435.771435.771435.771435.771435.981436.191436.191436.761436.761436.761436.761436.761437.181437.451437.451437.451437.451437.61437.661437.661437.661438.441438.441438.651438.651438.651438.651438.651438.651438.651438.651438.861439.071439.91440.531440.531440.95Tooltip
: Ø1425 (829.65-1440.95)
3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Multimedia
  (1678 - 31866, n=82, last 2 years)
9241 Points ∼100% +93%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
4990 Points ∼54% +4%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i7-10510U
4785 Points ∼52%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i7-1065G7
4614 Points ∼50% -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (3585 - 4942, n=29)
4404 Points ∼48% -8%
Schenker VIA 14
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-10210U
1537 Points ∼17% -68%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Multimedia
  (1065 - 23674, n=90, last 2 years)
6621 Points ∼100% +73%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i7-10510U
3819 Points ∼58%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i7-1065G7
3580 Points ∼54% -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (2939 - 3885, n=29)
3531 Points ∼53% -8%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
3134 Points ∼47% -18%
Schenker VIA 14
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-10210U
1230 Points ∼19% -68%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Multimedia
  (300 - 9323, n=74, last 2 years)
2309 Points ∼100% +99%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i7-10510U
1163 Points ∼50%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i7-1065G7
1105 Points ∼48% -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (881 - 1169, n=22)
1070 Points ∼46% -8%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
973 Points ∼42% -16%
Schenker VIA 14
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-10210U
357 Points ∼15% -69%
3DMark 11 Performance
5022 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
3460 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
1282 points
Aide
The Witcher 3 | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Multimedia
  (16 - 342, n=62, last 2 years)
128 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (47.4 - 70, n=24)
60.8 fps ∼48%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
56.4 (37min) fps ∼44%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
51.6 fps ∼40%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Multimedia
  (10.5 - 243, n=63, last 2 years)
81.7 fps ∼100% +127%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
36 fps ∼44%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (30 - 40, n=27)
35.3 fps ∼43% -2%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
33.5 (26min) fps ∼41% -7%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
33.5 fps ∼41% -7%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Multimedia
  (10.1 - 170, n=68, last 2 years)
49.1 fps ∼100% +134%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
21 fps ∼43%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (16.3 - 23.1, n=27)
20.1 fps ∼41% -4%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
18.8 (15min) fps ∼38% -10%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
16.5 fps ∼34% -21%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.9 - 92.1, n=70, last 2 years)
29.6 fps ∼100% +128%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
13 fps ∼44%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (9 - 16, n=24)
11.6 fps ∼39% -11%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
10.9 (8min) fps ∼37% -16%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
10.7 fps ∼36% -18%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 high (2/3)
Average of class Multimedia
  (18.2 - 139, n=75, last 2 years)
83.3 fps ∼100% +17%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
71.3 (62min) fps ∼86%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (8.6 - 77.4, n=20)
61.4 fps ∼74% -14%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
46.4 (41.6min) fps ∼56% -35%
Schenker VIA 14
Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
18.2 (15.8min) fps ∼22% -74%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Multimedia
  (10.3 - 84.6, n=67, last 2 years)
50.5 fps ∼100% +28%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250
39.3 fps ∼78%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250
  (9.8 - 52.6, n=16)
39 fps ∼77% -1%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
24.9 fps ∼49% -37%
Schenker VIA 14
Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
9.6 fps ∼19% -76%
Bas Moyen Élevé Ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 36 21 13 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 102.4 90.5 71.3 63.8 fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 47.7 42.8 39.3 fps

Degré de la nuisance sonore

Au repos
31 / 31 / 31.3 dB(A)
Fortement sollicité
43.4 / 41.5 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencieux
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
bruyant
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (à 15 cm de distance)   environment noise: 30.7 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.936.633.732.134.132.92541.337.837.134.133.641.33133.63530.932.433.533.6403133.930.930.730.8315031.134.130.731.13131.16329.232.22928.428.629.28026.83026.328.926.726.810030.329.225.326.12530.312525.428.926.226.92525.416025.324.924.624.123.825.320024.924.52323.523.224.925026.326.82422.223.226.331529.727.222.222.121.829.740026.12520.820.820.326.150027.326.42020.719.727.3630262519.620.719.72680028.227.218.819.818.528.2100030.329.418.919.318.330.3125030.628.818.219.118.130.6160031.530.118.318.918.131.5200033.732.118.218.818.133.7250033.831.918.319.21833.8315033.231.318.318.618.533.2400031.229.118.418.518.531.2500032.53018.418.618.532.5630032.229.418.518.618.632.2800030.127.118.518.618.630.11000024.221.818.618.518.624.21250021.92018.518.51921.91600021.219.418.618.719.221.2SPL43.441.63131.430.943.4N4.43.81.51.61.54.4median 29.7median 27.2median 18.6median 19.2median 18.6median 29.7Delta32.21.61.41.53hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
A pleine charge
 38.5 °C43 °C36.3 °C 
 36.6 °C41.1 °C34 °C 
 33.2 °C30.6 °C31.4 °C 
Maximum: 43 °C
Moyenne: 36.1 °C
40.2 °C44.8 °C40.4 °C
36.5 °C39.4 °C37.6 °C
32.8 °C34.5 °C34.5 °C
Maximum: 44.8 °C
Moyenne: 37.9 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  46.2 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 23.9 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 31 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 36.6 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.8 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 31 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.2 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 31 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.2 °C / 91.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-4.3 °C / -7.8 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.334.133.32530.733.630.73132.233.532.24030.330.830.35031.73131.76328.728.628.78029.226.729.210036.82536.812542.92542.916041.323.841.320034.523.234.525047.223.247.231554.421.854.440062.820.362.850065.919.765.963065.119.765.180066.318.566.3100070.218.370.2125066.918.166.9160064.718.164.7200063.718.163.7250064.61864.6315060.918.560.9400056.418.556.4500059.718.559.7630057.818.657.8800064.118.664.11000063.318.663.31250057.31957.31600060.919.260.9SPL76.330.976.3N38.21.538.2median 60.9median 18.6median 60.9Delta6.61.56.635.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029TApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.22 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.1% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.3 / 0.5 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 2.4 / 4.2 / 7.8 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 57 / 64 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing 1.3
Schenker VIA 14
i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, 73 Wh
843 min ∼32% +64%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ
R7 4700U, Vega 7, 48.85 Wh
715 min ∼27% +39%
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T
i7-10510U, GeForce MX250, 50 Wh
514 min ∼19%
Average of class Multimedia
  (198 - 912, n=83, last 2 years)
513 min ∼19% 0%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
i7-1065G7, GeForce MX250, 41 Wh
368 min ∼14% -28%
Autonomie
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
8h 34min

Points positifs

+ robustesse du châssis
+ polyvalent
+ autonomie

Points négatifs

- vitesse du lecteur de carte micro SD
- luminosité de l'écran
- léger coil whine

Verdict

En test : l'Asus VivoBook S14. Modèle de test fourni par : Asus Allemagne.
En test : l'Asus VivoBook S14. Modèle de test fourni par : Asus Allemagne.

L'Asus VivoBook S14 s'avère être un PC portable très stable. Ses performances sont plus que suffisantes pour la bureautique, et la Nvidia GeForce MX250 satisfera les joueurs occasionnels. Combinez cela à une bonne autonomie et à un châssis compact, et vous aurez un bon 14 pouces nomade.

L'Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL est un bon appareil polyvalent, qui possède de bonnes performances.

Seuls le lecteur de carte micro SD lent et le clavier, qui est un peu mou, peuvent être critiqués. Le reste est vraiment équilibré pour le prix. Cependant, on pourra être gêné par le léger coil whine quand l'adaptateur est branché, et par la MLI aux niveaux de luminosité les plus faibles. Ceux qui veulent un lecteur d'empreintes digitales devront se passer du pavé numérique - et inversement, ceux qui veulent un pavé numérique devront se passer du lecteur d'empreintes...

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL-EB029T - 07/20/2020 v7
Mike Wobker

Châssis
85 / 98 → 87%
Clavier
77%
Dispositif de pointage
87%
Connectivité
51 / 80 → 64%
Poids
70 / 20-72 → 97%
Autonomie
83 / 95 → 87%
Écran
79%
Performances en jeu
64 / 90 → 71%
Performances dans les applications
85 / 90 → 94%
Chauffe
90%
Nuisance sonore
85 / 95 → 89%
Audio
59%
Appareil photo
32 / 85 → 37%
Moyenne
73%
81%
Multimedia - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Stephanie Chamberlain
Editor of the original article: Stephanie Chamberlain - Translator - 372 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020
contact me via: LinkedIn
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Test de l'Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL (i7-10510U, MX250, FHD) : PC portable coloré et robuste
Mike Wobker, 2020-08-28 (Update: 2020-08-28)