Courte critique de la station de travail Fujitsu Celsius H980 (i7-8750H, Quadro P3200, FHD)

Sebastian Bade, 👁 Andreas Osthoff, ✓ Felicitas Krohn (traduit par Prévots), 02/10/2019

Station de travail XXL. Fujitsu a mis à jour sa station de travail Celsius, avec des processeurs Coffee Lake. Le Celsius H980 possède également une carte graphique NVIDIA Quadro P3200. Lisez ce rapport de test pour voir si le fabricant japonais a corrigé les problèmes de refroidissement qui gâchaient le Celsius H970, et comment son successeur se comporte dans les tests.

Exemplaire de test fourni par Fujitsu Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Fujitsu Celsius H980

Processeur

Intel Core i7-8750H

Carte graphique

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 - 6144 Mo, Processeur: 1328 - 1543 MHz, Mémoire: 7012 MHz, GP104, 397.93, Optimus

Mémoire

16384 Mo

, DDR4-2400, double canal, 2 emplacements SO-DIMM sur 4 occupés, 64 Go maximum

Écran

17.3 pouces 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPP, LG Philips, LP173WF4-SPF5, IPS, brillant: non

Carte mère

Intel QM370

Disque dur

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, 512 Go

, 432 Go libres

Connexions

3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, 1 VGA, 3 DisplayPort, 1 Encoche de Sécurité Kensington, Connectique audio: combo jack 3,5 mm, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: SD / SDHC / SDXC, 1 Lecteur de cartes à puce, 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales

Réseau

Intel Ethernet Connection I219-LM (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5

Taille

Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 30 x 418 x 288

Batterie

96 Wh, 6700 mAh Lithium-Ion, Amovible

Système d'exploitation

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Appareil photo

Webcam: 720p

Fonctionnalités additionnelles

Haut-parleurs: stéréos, Clavier: 6 rangs avec rétroéclairage et pavé numérique, Rétroéclairage du clavier: oui, disque de récupération, disque de pilotes, Fujitsu Battery Utility, Microsoft Office (version d'essai), CyberLink YouCam 6, 36 Mois Garantie

Poids

3.493 kg, Alimentation: 1.342 kg

Prix

3 899 Euro

Liens

Fujitsu Page d'accueil

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

voir toutes les spécifications

Comparaison des tailles

Dell Precision 7720 HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA Fujitsu Celsius H980 Fujitsu Celsius H970 Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE

Côté droit : lecteur de carte micro SD, 2 ports Thunderbolt 3, USB A 3.0, DisplayPort, entrée secteur.

Côté gauche : verrou de sécurité Kensington, VGA, 2 x USB A 3.0, 3.5 mm prise jack écouteurs / micro, lecteur de carte à puce.

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	177 MB/s ∼100% +20%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	171 MB/s ∼97% +16%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	148 MB/s ∼84%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	140 MB/s ∼79% -5%
Average of class Workstation (17.2 - 213, n=65)	137 MB/s ∼77% -7%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	203.3 MB/s ∼100% +15%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	202.7 MB/s ∼100% +15%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	176.9 MB/s ∼87%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	175.5 MB/s ∼86% -1%
Average of class Workstation (18.4 - 255, n=64)	171 MB/s ∼84% -3%

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	693 (min: 345, max: 697) MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Intel Wireless-AC 9560	681 (min: 341, max: 686) MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	676 MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Average of class Workstation (292 - 1557, n=53)	659 MBit/s ∼95% -5%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA Intel Wireless-AC 9560	657 MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Dell Precision 7720 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	587 MBit/s ∼85% -15%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA Intel Wireless-AC 9560	679 MBit/s ∼100% +4%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	652 (min: 330, max: 712) MBit/s ∼96%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Intel Wireless-AC 9560	642 (min: 629, max: 650) MBit/s ∼95% -2%
Average of class Workstation (83 - 1642, n=53)	600 MBit/s ∼88% -8%
Dell Precision 7720 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	518 MBit/s ∼76% -21%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	504 MBit/s ∼74% -23%

; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø681 (345-697)

; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø641 (330-712)


396 cd/m²	403 cd/m²	397 cd/m²
393 cd/m²	400 cd/m²	406 cd/m²
374 cd/m²	400 cd/m²	378 cd/m²

Homogénéité de la luminosité

LG Philips, LP173WF4-SPF5

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 406 cd/m² Moyenne: 394.1 cd/m² Minimum: 21.4 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 92 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 401 cd/m²
Contraste: 784:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.51 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.3 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 3.8
ΔE Greyscale 5.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
84.9% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 55.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.17

Profil ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Fujitsu Celsius H980 LG Philips, LP173WF4-SPF5, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3	Fujitsu Celsius H970 LP173WF4-SPF3, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 17.3	Dell Precision 7720 SHP1446 (LQ173D1), IGZO, 3840x2160, 17.3	Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE LP173WF4_SPF7, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3	HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA AUO B173HW01 V0, , 1920x1080, 17.3
Response Times		1%	-86%	-16%	-17%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	38 (19.2, 18.8)	32 (14.8, 17.2) 16%	60 (26.8, 33.2) -58%	40.8 (22, 18.8) -7%	42.4 (21.2, 21.2) -12%
Response Time Black / White *	23.2 (10, 13.2)	26.4 (14.8, 11.6) -14%	46.4 (28.4, 18) -100%	28.8 (15.6, 13.2) -24%	28.4 (15.6, 12.8) -22%
PWM Frequency	120500 (99)		1020 (20) -99%
Screen		2%	24%	12%	14%
Brightness middle	400	368 -8%	464 16%	338 -15%	335 -16%
Brightness	394	360 -9%	441 12%	317 -20%	326 -17%
Brightness Distribution	92	91 -1%	89 -3%	86 -7%	92 0%
Black Level *	0.51	0.3 41%	0.45 12%	0.28 45%	0.22 57%
Contrast	784	1227 57%	1031 32%	1207 54%	1523 94%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	5.3	6.4 -21%	3.2 40%	4.3 19%	4.7 11%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	9.3	10.1 -9%	6.1 34%	10.2 -10%	8.7 6%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *	3.8			3.7 3%	2.7 29%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	5.5	7.2 -31%	4.2 24%	2.2 60%	6.5 -18%
Gamma	2.17 ^101%	2.02 ^109%	2.01 ^109%	2.17 ^101%	2.23 ^99%
CCT	6686 ^97%	6882 ^94%	6736 ^96%	6621 ^98%	6108 ^106%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	55.8	55.5 -1%	88.1 58%	55.8 0%	58.7 5%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	84.9	84.4 -1%	100 18%	84.7 0%	89.7 6%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)		2% / 2%	-31% / -1%	-2% / 8%	-2% / 9%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Fujitsu Celsius H980 - CalMAN : Échelle de gris - Avant calibrage. — CalMAN : Échelle de gris - Avant calibrage.

Fujitsu Celsius H980 - CalMAN : ColorChecker - Avant calibrage. — CalMAN : ColorChecker - Avant calibrage.

Fujitsu Celsius H980 - CalMAN : saturation - Avant calibrage. — CalMAN : saturation - Avant calibrage.

Fujitsu Celsius H980 - CalMAN : Échelle de gris - Après calibrage. — CalMAN : Échelle de gris - Après calibrage.

Fujitsu Celsius H980 - CalMAN : ColorChecker - Après calibrage. — CalMAN : ColorChecker - Après calibrage.

Fujitsu Celsius H980 - CalMAN : Saturation - Après calibrage. — CalMAN : Saturation - Après calibrage.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

ℹ

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.

↔ Temps de réponse noir à blanc
23.2 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↗ 10 ms hausse
23.2 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↘ 13.2 ms chute
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 33 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont similaires à la moyenne (24.9 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
↔ Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
38 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↗ 19.2 ms hausse
38 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↘ 18.8 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont similaires à la moyenne (39.6 ms) de tous les appareils testés.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

ℹ

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) décelé

120500 Hz

≤ 99 Niveau de luminosité

Le rétroéclairage de l'écran scintille à la fréquence de 120500 Hz (certainement du fait de l'utilisation d'une MDI - Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) à un niveau de luminosité inférieur ou égal à 99 % . Aucun scintillement ne devrait être perceptible au-dessus de cette valeur.

La fréquence de rafraîchissement de 120500 Hz est élevée, la grande majorité des utilisateurs ne devrait pas percevoir de scintillements et être sujette à une fatigue oculaire accrue.

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 13646 (minimum : 43 - maximum : 2500000) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Fujitsu Celsius H980 - Intel Extreme Utility.

Fujitsu Celsius H980 - Intel Extreme Utility (Benchmark).

Fujitsu Celsius H980 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1034 (1025.75-1058.79)

Fujitsu Celsius H970 Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6: Ø652 (625-675)

Dell Precision 7720 Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6: Ø848 (836.51-852.66)

Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Intel Core i7-8850H, Intel Core i7-8850H; Undervolting: Ø1267 (1252.58-1272.26)

Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Intel Core i7-8850H, Intel Core i7-8850H; Default: Ø1147 (1115.23-1244.83)

HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA Intel Core i7-8850H, Intel Core i7-8850H: Ø1062 (1050.28-1181.65)

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F7W Intel Core i9-9900K	214 Points ∼100% +22%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Intel Core i7-8850H	184 Points ∼86% +5%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA Intel Core i7-8850H	181 Points ∼85% +3%
Dell Precision 7720 Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	179 Points ∼84% +2%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Intel Core i7-8750H	175 Points ∼82%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (163 - 177, n=86)	172 Points ∼80% -2%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	171 Points ∼80% -2%
Average of class Workstation (117 - 214, n=101)	160 Points ∼75% -9%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F7W Intel Core i9-9900K	1623 Points ∼100% +49%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Intel Core i7-8850H	1267 Points ∼78% +16%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Intel Core i7-8850H	1262 Points ∼78% +16%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA Intel Core i7-8850H	1200 Points ∼74% +10%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (863 - 1251, n=93)	1107 Points ∼68% +2%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Intel Core i7-8750H	1090 Points ∼67%
Dell Precision 7720 Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	848 Points ∼52% -22%
Average of class Workstation (260 - 1623, n=104)	774 Points ∼48% -29%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	675 Points ∼42% -38%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F7W Intel Core i9-9900K	2.43 Points ∼100% +22%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Intel Core i7-8750H	1.99 Points ∼82%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (1.89 - 2, n=40)	1.967 Points ∼81% -1%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	1.92 Points ∼79% -4%
Average of class Workstation (1.09 - 2.43, n=90)	1.707 Points ∼70% -14%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Intel Core i7-8850H	1.09 Points ∼45% -45%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Eurocom Tornado F7W Intel Core i9-9900K	17.37 Points ∼100% +38%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Intel Core i7-8850H	13.93 Points ∼80% +10%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Intel Core i7-8750H	12.62 Points ∼73%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (9.54 - 13.5, n=41)	12.2 Points ∼70% -3%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	7.48 Points ∼43% -41%
Average of class Workstation (2.16 - 17.4, n=108)	6.89 Points ∼40% -45%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (8472 - 8665, n=5)	8542 Points ∼100% +1%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Intel Core i7-8750H	8472 Points ∼99%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	8325 Points ∼97% -2%
Average of class Workstation (3552 - 9224, n=73)	6183 Points ∼72% -27%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Intel Core i7-8750H	46384 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (33944 - 46384, n=5)	42290 Points ∼91% -9%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	28617 Points ∼62% -38%
Average of class Workstation (7542 - 46384, n=73)	21641 Points ∼47% -53%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Eurocom Tornado F7W Intel Core i9-9900K	315.56 Points ∼100% +28%
Dell Precision 7720 Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	294.7 Points ∼93% +20%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	279.55 Points ∼89% +14%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA Intel Core i7-8850H	259.9 Points ∼82% +6%
Average of class Workstation (176 - 316, n=47)	255 Points ∼81% +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Intel Core i7-8850H	254.1 Points ∼81% +3%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (205 - 299, n=49)	247 Points ∼78% 0%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Intel Core i7-8750H	245.86 Points ∼78%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Fujitsu Celsius H970 Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	44371 Points ∼100% +30%
Dell Precision 7720 Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	41579 Points ∼94% +22%
Average of class Workstation (14774 - 44780, n=48)	35377 Points ∼80% +4%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA Intel Core i7-8850H	35247 Points ∼79% +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Intel Core i7-8850H	34141 Points ∼77% 0%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (27460 - 44549, n=47)	34108 Points ∼77% 0%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Intel Core i7-8750H	34043 Points ∼77%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Intel Core i7-8850H	1116.8 ms * ∼100% -0%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Intel Core i7-8750H	1113.7 ms * ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (695 - 1272, n=50)	1108 ms * ∼99% +1%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA Intel Core i7-8850H	1070.4 ms * ∼96% +4%
Average of class Workstation (1055 - 2263, n=51)	1069 ms * ∼96% +4%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	870.6 ms * ∼78% +22%
Dell Precision 7720 Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	861.5 ms * ∼77% +23%

Blender 2.79 - ---
Average of class Workstation (276 - 881, n=18)	529 Seconds * ∼100% -19%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (396 - 486, n=6)	456 Seconds * ∼86% -3%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Intel Core i7-8750H	444.4 Seconds * ∼84%
Eurocom Tornado F7W Intel Core i9-9900K	276.1 Seconds * ∼52% +38%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Fujitsu Celsius H980 - Cinebench R10. — Cinebench R10.

Fujitsu Celsius H980 - Cinebench R11.5. — Cinebench R11.5.

Fujitsu Celsius H980 - Cinebench R15. — Cinebench R15.

Fujitsu Celsius H980 - Jetstream 1.1. — Jetstream 1.1.

Fujitsu Celsius H980 - Octane V2. — Octane V2.

Fujitsu Celsius H980 - Mozilla Kraken 1.1. — Mozilla Kraken 1.1.

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit

8472 Points

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

6739

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

35116

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

6561

Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit

6803 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit

46384 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

120.04 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.99 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 32Bit

118.86 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit

11.35 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit

1.78 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

12.62 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

175 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

164.96 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1090 Points

Aide

... en comparaison

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Eurocom Tornado F7W Quadro P5200, 9900K, 3x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)	8122 Points ∼100% +23%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Quadro P3200, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	6622 Points ∼82%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA Quadro P3200	6622 Points ∼82% 0%
Dell Precision 7720 Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	6437 Points ∼79% -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Quadro P3200, 8850H, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA	6058 Points ∼75% -9%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 Quadro P4000, E3-1535M v6, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	5523 Points ∼68% -17%
Average of class Workstation (2329 - 8528, n=44)	5180 Points ∼64% -22%
Productivity
Eurocom Tornado F7W Quadro P5200, 9900K, 3x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)	8307 Points ∼100% +15%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 Quadro P4000, E3-1535M v6, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	7734 Points ∼93% +7%
Dell Precision 7720 Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	7544 Points ∼91% +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Quadro P3200, 8850H, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA	7459 Points ∼90% +4%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Quadro P3200, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	7203 Points ∼87%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA Quadro P3200	7203 Points ∼87% 0%
Average of class Workstation (3998 - 8307, n=44)	7056 Points ∼85% -2%
Essentials
Eurocom Tornado F7W Quadro P5200, 9900K, 3x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)	9847 Points ∼100% +23%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Quadro P3200, 8850H, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA	9121 Points ∼93% +14%
Average of class Workstation (5223 - 9917, n=44)	8575 Points ∼87% +7%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 Quadro P4000, E3-1535M v6, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	8140 Points ∼83% +1%
Dell Precision 7720 Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	8077 Points ∼82% +1%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Quadro P3200, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	8032 Points ∼82%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA Quadro P3200	8032 Points ∼82% 0%
Score
Eurocom Tornado F7W Quadro P5200, 9900K, 3x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)	6255 Points ∼100% +20%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Quadro P3200, 8850H, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA	5335 Points ∼85% +2%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA Quadro P3200, 8850H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G	5287 Points ∼85% +2%
Dell Precision 7720 Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	5248 Points ∼84% +1%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Quadro P3200, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5206 Points ∼83%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA Quadro P3200	5206 Points ∼83% 0%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 Quadro P4000, E3-1535M v6, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	5041 Points ∼81% -3%
Average of class Workstation (2817 - 6255, n=45)	4825 Points ∼77% -7%

PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Quadro P3200, 8850H, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA	5503 Points ∼100% +7%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 Quadro P4000, E3-1535M v6, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	5277 Points ∼96% +3%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA Quadro P3200, 8850H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G	5276 Points ∼96% +3%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Quadro P3200, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5132 Points ∼93%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA Quadro P3200	5132 Points ∼93% 0%
Average of class Workstation (3311 - 5655, n=81)	4829 Points ∼88% -6%
Dell Precision 7720 Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	4460 Points ∼81% -13%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Eurocom Tornado F7W Quadro P5200, 9900K, 3x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)	5130 Points ∼100% +17%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Quadro P3200, 8850H, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA	4550 Points ∼89% +4%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 Quadro P3200, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	4376 Points ∼85%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA Quadro P3200	4376 Points ∼85% 0%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA Quadro P3200, 8850H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G	4332 Points ∼84% -1%
Average of class Workstation (2320 - 5505, n=82)	3975 Points ∼77% -9%
Dell Precision 7720 Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	3772 Points ∼74% -14%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4376 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5132 points
Aide

Fujitsu Celsius H980 - AS SSD. — AS SSD.

	Fujitsu Celsius H980 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	Fujitsu Celsius H970 Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	Dell Precision 7720 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA	Average Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		33%	15%	8%	13%
Write 4K	111.8	176.1 58%	169.16 51%	101.04 -10%	125 (90.4 - 176, n=60) 12%
Read 4K	32.02	44.53 39%	46.03 44%	45.37 42%	43.7 (28 - 61.3, n=59) 36%
Write Seq	1539	1637 6%	1234.23 -20%	1408.54 -8%	1605 (112 - 2730, n=58) 4%
Read Seq	1252	1714 37%	1853.87 48%	2129.47 70%	1719 (501 - 2665, n=58) 37%
Write 4K Q32T1	355.4	534.1 50%	364.81 3%	320.28 -10%	414 (198 - 1707, n=60) 16%
Read 4K Q32T1	408.7	635.1 55%	551.68 35%	348.3 -15%	414 (230 - 1015, n=60) 1%
Write Seq Q32T1	1912.6	1632 -15%	1087.7 -43%	1529.2 -20%	2083 (1714 - 2994, n=60) 9%
Read Seq Q32T1	2529.9	3310 31%	2582.2 2%	2957 17%	3110 (1772 - 3565, n=60) 23%
Write 4K Q8T8	1772				1264 (369 - 1814, n=13) -29%
Read 4K Q8T8	1021.8				1193 (527 - 1620, n=13) 17%
AS SSD		3%		2%	4%
Copy Game MB/s	690.97	838.78 21%		909.14 32%	1037 (547 - 1639, n=41) 50%
Copy Program MB/s	354.31	297.54 -16%		519.85 47%	454 (206 - 828, n=41) 28%
Copy ISO MB/s	1395.88	1721.74 23%		1545.31 11%	1742 (917 - 3259, n=41) 25%
Score Total	4003	3509 -12%		2305 -42%	3939 (2348 - 5316, n=58) -2%
Score Write	1901	1210 -36%		791 -58%	1776 (147 - 2992, n=58) -7%
Score Read	1363	1557 14%		1044 -23%	1436 (752 - 2125, n=58) 5%
Access Time Write *	0.037	0.048 -30%		0.037 -0%	0.0849 (0.025 - 2.52, n=58) -129%
Access Time Read *	0.053	0.05 6%		0.044 17%	0.0509 (0.029 - 0.103, n=58) 4%
4K-64 Write	1622.32	971.07 -40%		539.68 -67%	1503 (96.2 - 2716, n=58) -7%
4K-64 Read	1208.57	1245.7 3%		703.5 -42%	1190 (530 - 1823, n=58) -2%
4K Write	100.42	78.05 -22%		105.76 5%	111 (1.76 - 142, n=58) 11%
4K Read	46.09	38.88 -16%		46.64 1%	50.2 (31.7 - 61, n=58) 9%
Seq Write	1780.93	1609.28 -10%		1451 -19%	1622 (487 - 2564, n=58) -9%
Seq Read	1082.4	2725.76 152%		2935 171%	1965 (1030 - 2806, n=58) 82%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)		18% / 14%	15% / 15%	5% / 5%	9% / 8%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ

Sequential Read: 1257 MB/s

Sequential Write: 1665 MB/s

512K Read: 811.2 MB/s

512K Write: 1578 MB/s

4K Read: 52.62 MB/s

4K Write: 97.78 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 342.3 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 305.3 MB/s

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	19569 Points ∼100% +16%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	17021 Points ∼87% +1%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	16805 Points ∼86%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (14673 - 17021, n=4)	16233 Points ∼83% -3%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	15433 Points ∼79% -8%
Average of class Workstation (841 - 26465, n=114)	6818 Points ∼35% -59%

3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	4378 Points ∼100% +1%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	4356 Points ∼99%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (3732 - 4378, n=3)	4155 Points ∼95% -5%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	3960 Points ∼90% -9%
Average of class Workstation (566 - 7734, n=34)	3317 Points ∼76% -24%
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	2898 Points ∼66% -33%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	14666 Points ∼100% +17%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	12555 Points ∼86% 0%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	12554 Points ∼86%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	12259 Points ∼84% -2%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (11316 - 12558, n=4)	12246 Points ∼83% -2%
Average of class Workstation (752 - 20913, n=106)	5585 Points ∼38% -56%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	86679 Points ∼100% +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	84059 Points ∼97% +2%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	82300 Points ∼95%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (57501 - 84059, n=4)	76643 Points ∼88% -7%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	53834 Points ∼62% -35%
Average of class Workstation (5836 - 119052, n=106)	34431 Points ∼40% -58%

SPECviewperf 12
1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03)
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	148.39 fps ∼100% +2%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	144.9 fps ∼98%
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	142.34 fps ∼96% -2%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (102 - 148, n=5)	130 fps ∼88% -10%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	117.45 fps ∼79% -19%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	117.07 fps ∼79% -19%
Average of class Workstation (15.6 - 212, n=89)	77.9 fps ∼52% -46%
1900x1060 Siemens NX (snx-02)
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	157.44 fps ∼100% +17%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	134.52 fps ∼85%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	130.1 fps ∼83% -3%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	126.25 fps ∼80% -6%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (108 - 135, n=5)	124 fps ∼79% -8%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	83.11 fps ∼53% -38%
Average of class Workstation (4.87 - 218, n=89)	62.4 fps ∼40% -54%
1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01)
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	68.76 fps ∼100% +16%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	67.16 fps ∼98% +14%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	59.94 fps ∼87% +2%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (58.5 - 59.9, n=5)	59.1 fps ∼86% 0%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	59.05 fps ∼86%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	58.52 fps ∼85% -1%
Average of class Workstation (3.93 - 98.1, n=87)	33.7 fps ∼49% -43%
1900x1060 Medical (medical-01)
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	62.74 fps ∼100% +29%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	48.7 fps ∼78%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	47.28 fps ∼75% -3%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	47.1 fps ∼75% -3%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (43.7 - 48.7, n=5)	46.2 fps ∼74% -5%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	39.4 fps ∼63% -19%
Average of class Workstation (0.99 - 79.4, n=89)	23.7 fps ∼38% -51%
1900x1060 Maya (maya-04)
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	92.73 fps ∼100% +3%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	90.3 fps ∼97%
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	88.79 fps ∼96% -2%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (64.9 - 92.7, n=5)	79.8 fps ∼86% -12%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	77.88 fps ∼84% -14%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	69.43 fps ∼75% -23%
Average of class Workstation (5.4 - 148, n=90)	46.9 fps ∼51% -48%
1900x1060 Energy (energy-01)
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	14.22 fps ∼100% +33%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	10.72 fps ∼75%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	10.61 fps ∼75% -1%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	10.51 fps ∼74% -2%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	10.29 fps ∼72% -4%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (9.04 - 10.7, n=5)	10.2 fps ∼72% -5%
Average of class Workstation (0.06 - 16.9, n=90)	4.88 fps ∼34% -54%
1900x1060 Creo (creo-01)
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	117.15 fps ∼100% +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	112.57 fps ∼96% +3%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	109.47 fps ∼93%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (97.2 - 113, n=5)	106 fps ∼90% -3%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	97.2 fps ∼83% -11%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	97.14 fps ∼83% -11%
Average of class Workstation (14 - 160, n=90)	58.2 fps ∼50% -47%
1900x1060 Catia (catia-04)
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	139.86 fps ∼100% +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	126.84 fps ∼91% +1%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	125.36 fps ∼90%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (105 - 127, n=5)	117 fps ∼84% -7%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	115.22 fps ∼82% -8%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	107.5 fps ∼77% -14%
Average of class Workstation (13.4 - 197, n=90)	63.9 fps ∼46% -49%
1900x1060 3ds Max (3dsmax-05)
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (110 - 110, n=2)	110 fps ∼100% 0%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	109.97 fps ∼100%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	93.62 fps ∼85% -15%
Average of class Workstation (11.4 - 184, n=22)	68.8 fps ∼63% -37%

SPECviewperf 13
Solidworks (sw-04)
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	133.5 fps ∼100% +2%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	131.52 fps ∼99%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (109 - 134, n=4)	121 fps ∼91% -8%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	108.54 fps ∼81% -17%
Average of class Workstation (37.3 - 189, n=25)	99.6 fps ∼75% -24%
Siemens NX (snx-03)
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	243.53 fps ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	238.9 fps ∼98% -2%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (204 - 244, n=4)	229 fps ∼94% -6%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	228.36 fps ∼94% -6%
Average of class Workstation (36.4 - 396, n=25)	174 fps ∼71% -29%
Showcase (showcase-02)
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	59.17 fps ∼100% +1%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	58.85 fps ∼99%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (58.4 - 59.2, n=4)	58.8 fps ∼99% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	58.4 fps ∼99% -1%
Average of class Workstation (12.6 - 97.3, n=25)	49.3 fps ∼83% -16%
Medical (medical-02)
Average of class Workstation (6.8 - 81.3, n=25)	35.7 fps ∼100% +15%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (27.5 - 37.9, n=4)	31.6 fps ∼89% +2%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	30.91 fps ∼87%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	29.9 fps ∼84% -3%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	27.49 fps ∼77% -11%
Maya (maya-05)
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	168.57 fps ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	163.9 fps ∼97% -3%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (148 - 169, n=4)	158 fps ∼94% -6%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	150.25 fps ∼89% -11%
Average of class Workstation (29.4 - 255, n=25)	126 fps ∼75% -25%
Energy (energy-02)
Average of class Workstation (0.72 - 38, n=25)	14.1 fps ∼100% +66%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (8.39 - 25.2, n=4)	12.6 fps ∼89% +48%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	8.5 fps ∼60%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	8.41 fps ∼60% -1%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	8.39 fps ∼60% -1%
Creo (creo-02)
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	165.3 fps ∼100% +4%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	158.84 fps ∼96%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (146 - 165, n=4)	156 fps ∼94% -2%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	146.44 fps ∼89% -8%
Average of class Workstation (27.8 - 248, n=25)	126 fps ∼76% -21%
Catia (catia-05)
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	200.5 fps ∼100% +5%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	190.79 fps ∼95%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (169 - 201, n=4)	185 fps ∼92% -3%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	168.94 fps ∼84% -11%
Average of class Workstation (27.7 - 302, n=25)	141 fps ∼70% -26%
3ds Max (3dsmax-06)
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	107.52 fps ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	105.9 fps ∼98% -2%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (92.5 - 108, n=4)	103 fps ∼96% -4%
Average of class Workstation (20 - 182, n=25)	96.1 fps ∼89% -11%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	92.5 fps ∼86% -14%

LuxMark v2.0 64Bit
Room GPUs-only
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	2337 Samples/s ∼100% +7%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	2181 Samples/s ∼93%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (1842 - 2206, n=5)	2052 Samples/s ∼88% -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	1863 Samples/s ∼80% -15%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	1847 Samples/s ∼79% -15%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	1842 Samples/s ∼79% -16%
Average of class Workstation (49 - 2840, n=88)	897 Samples/s ∼38% -59%
Sala GPUs-only
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	4383 Samples/s ∼100%
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	4357 Samples/s ∼99% -1%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (3612 - 4383, n=5)	4038 Samples/s ∼92% -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	3635 Samples/s ∼83% -17%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	3612 Samples/s ∼82% -18%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	3564 Samples/s ∼81% -19%
Average of class Workstation (48 - 5927, n=89)	1688 Samples/s ∼39% -61%

Unigine Heaven 4.0
Extreme Preset OpenGL
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	88.2 fps ∼100% +21%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	73 fps ∼83%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (70.3 - 73, n=3)	71.6 fps ∼81% -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	71.4 fps ∼81% -2%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	70.3 fps ∼80% -4%
Average of class Workstation (6.8 - 107, n=30)	39.3 fps ∼45% -46%
Extreme Preset DX11
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	100.3 fps ∼100% +30%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	77.2 fps ∼77%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	75.7 fps ∼75% -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	75.6 fps ∼75% -2%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (71.4 - 77.2, n=4)	75 fps ∼75% -3%
Average of class Workstation (8.1 - 125, n=39)	43.6 fps ∼43% -44%

Unigine Valley 1.0
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	73.9 fps ∼100% +23%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	63 fps ∼85% +5%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (57.1 - 63, n=3)	60 fps ∼81% 0%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	59.9 fps ∼81%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	57.1 fps ∼77% -5%
Average of class Workstation (6.1 - 94.6, n=42)	32.8 fps ∼44% -45%
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	55.4 fps ∼100% +10%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	50.2 fps ∼91%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	49.7 fps ∼90% -1%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (49.3 - 50.2, n=3)	49.7 fps ∼90% -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	49.3 fps ∼89% -2%
Average of class Workstation (5.6 - 75.8, n=41)	26.8 fps ∼48% -47%

SiSoft Sandra 2016
Image Processing
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	820.96 MPix/s ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	819.22 MPix/s ∼100% 0%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (691 - 830, n=4)	790 MPix/s ∼96% -4%
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	785.7 MPix/s ∼96% -4%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	690.6 MPix/s ∼84% -16%
Average of class Workstation (95.8 - 1240, n=37)	363 MPix/s ∼44% -56%
GP Cryptography (Higher Security AES256+SHA2-512)
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	33.08 GB/s ∼100% +10%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	30.16 GB/s ∼91% +1%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	30 GB/s ∼91%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (28.1 - 30.2, n=4)	29.3 GB/s ∼89% -2%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	28.1 GB/s ∼85% -6%
Average of class Workstation (3.92 - 58, n=37)	15 GB/s ∼45% -50%
GP Financial Analysis (FP High/Double Precision)
Dell Precision 7720 NVIDIA Quadro P5000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	100.48 KOPT/s ∼100% +16%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	86.37 KOPT/s ∼86%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	86.14 KOPT/s ∼86% 0%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (84.5 - 86.6, n=4)	85.9 KOPT/s ∼85% -1%
HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	84.5 KOPT/s ∼84% -2%
Average of class Workstation (11.8 - 111, n=37)	41.4 KOPT/s ∼41% -52%

ComputeMark v2.1
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	3518 Points ∼100%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (3204 - 3518, n=3)	3311 Points ∼94% -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	3210 Points ∼91% -9%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	2934 Points ∼83% -17%
Average of class Workstation (243 - 6306, n=44)	1948 Points ∼55% -45%
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	2016 Points ∼100%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (1837 - 2016, n=3)	1919 Points ∼95% -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	1837 Points ∼91% -9%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	1767 Points ∼88% -12%
Average of class Workstation (129 - 3664, n=44)	1213 Points ∼60% -40%
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	1983 Points ∼100%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (1821 - 1983, n=3)	1899 Points ∼96% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	1821 Points ∼92% -8%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	1786 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Workstation (139 - 3371, n=44)	1160 Points ∼58% -42%
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	1065 Points ∼100% +17%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	910 Points ∼85%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (892 - 910, n=3)	899 Points ∼84% -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	895 Points ∼84% -2%
Average of class Workstation (72 - 1716, n=44)	622 Points ∼58% -32%
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	1058 Points ∼100% +17%
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	908 Points ∼86%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (891 - 908, n=3)	898 Points ∼85% -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	891 Points ∼84% -2%
Average of class Workstation (65 - 1957, n=44)	642 Points ∼61% -29%
1024x600 Normal, Score
Fujitsu Celsius H980 NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8750H	9335 Points ∼100%
Average NVIDIA Quadro P3200 (8654 - 9335, n=3)	8927 Points ∼96% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE NVIDIA Quadro P3200, Intel Core i7-8850H	8654 Points ∼93% -7%
Fujitsu Celsius H970 NVIDIA Quadro P4000, Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6	8609 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Workstation (388 - 15892, n=46)	5252 Points ∼56% -44%

3DMark 11 Performance		15178 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		90781 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		34178 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		11114 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		5856 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		4593 points
Aide

... en comparaison

	Bas	Moyen	Élevé	Ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	284.9	246.5	231.5	112.3	fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	129.6	121.2	114.7	107.8	fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	182	144	86	73	fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	100	86	72		fps
Far Cry 5 (2018)	120	79	74	70	fps

Degré de la nuisance sonore

Au repos		29.6 / 32.5 / 32.5 dB(A)
Fortement sollicité		34.9 / 49.1 dB(A)

	30 dB silencieux 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) bruyant
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (à 15 cm de distance) environment noise: 29.6 dB(A)

	Fujitsu Celsius H980 Quadro P3200, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	Fujitsu Celsius H970 Quadro P4000, E3-1535M v6, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	Dell Precision 7720 Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Quadro P3200, 8850H, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA	HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA Quadro P3200, 8850H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
Noise		-6%	4%	10%	5%
off / environment *	29.6	30.2 -2%	29.5 -0%	28.6 3%	28.7 3%
Idle Minimum *	29.6	30.2 -2%	29.5 -0%	28.6 3%	28.7 3%
Idle Average *	32.5	32.8 -1%	29.5 9%	28.6 12%	28.7 12%
Idle Maximum *	32.5	32.8 -1%	29.5 9%	28.6 12%	30.9 5%
Load Average *	34.9	47.3 -36%	35 -0%	31.9 9%	37.3 -7%
Load Maximum *	49.1	47.3 4%	47.8 3%	37.7 23%	41.4 16%
Witcher 3 ultra *			41	35.7	41.1

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

A pleine charge

Au repos/à faible charge


40.7 °C	41.8 °C	37.4 °C
33.8 °C	37.3 °C	35.8 °C
23.1 °C	23.6 °C	23.8 °C

Maximum: 41.8 °C
Moyenne: 33 °C


40 °C	46.2 °C	41.9 °C
26.1 °C	35.9 °C	36.1 °C
26.4 °C	22.4 °C	21.8 °C

Maximum: 46.2 °C
Moyenne: 33 °C

Alimentation (valeur maximale) 35.9 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Workstation.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 37.2 °C / 99 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.2 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.1 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 23.8 °C / 74.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (+4 °C / 7.2 F).

	Fujitsu Celsius H980 Quadro P3200, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	Fujitsu Celsius H970 Quadro P4000, E3-1535M v6, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	Dell Precision 7720 Quadro P5000, E3-1535M v6, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE Quadro P3200, 8850H, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA	HP ZBook 17 G5-2ZC48EA Quadro P3200, 8850H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
Heat		-1%	-1%	9%	2%
Maximum Upper Side *	41.8	41.4 1%	42.3 -1%	42.8 -2%	42.9 -3%
Maximum Bottom *	46.2	48.7 -5%	44.9 3%	39.5 15%	46.3 -0%
Idle Upper Side *	25.6	26.2 -2%	26.1 -2%	23.1 10%	24.8 3%
Idle Bottom *	26.6	26.4 1%	27.9 -5%	23.5 12%	24.9 6%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Fujitsu Celsius H980 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (69.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 96% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 19%, worst was 31%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Lenovo ThinkPad P72-20MB000EGE audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (69.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 90% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 19%, worst was 31%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consommation énergétique

Éteint/en veille	0.65 / 0.9 Watts
Au repos	14.8 / 20.4 / 21.5 Watts
Fortement sollicité	98.4 / 213.5 Watts