Courte critique de la tablette Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
Appareil photo secondaire: 8 MPix f/2,2, focus fixe
Top 10
» Le Top 10 des PC portables multimédia
» Le Top 10 des PC portables de jeu
» Le Top 10 des PC portables de jeu légers
» Le Top 10 des ordinateurs portables bureautiques
» Le Top 10 des PC portables bureautiques premium/professionnels
» Le Top 10 des Stations de travail mobiles
» Le Top 10 des Ultraportables
» Le Top 10 des Ultrabooks
» Le Top 10 des Convertibles
» Le Top 10 des Tablettes
» Le Top 10 des Tablettes Windows
» Le Top 10 des Smartphones
» Le Top 10 des PC Portables á moins de 300 euros
» Le Top 10 des PC Portables á moins de 500 euros
» Le Top 25 des meilleurs écrans d'ordinateurs
Comparaison des tailles
Networking | |
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Apple iPad 6 2018 | |
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus | |
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Apple iPad 6 2018 | |
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus | |
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 |
|
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 84 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 384 cd/m²
Contraste: 480:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.8 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.83 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 7.5 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.199
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro IPS, 2560x1600, 10.80 | Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.10 | Apple iPad 6 2018 IPS, 2048x1536, 9.70 | Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus IPS, 1920x1200, 10.10 | Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.10 | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 IPS, 2560x1600, 10.80 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 22% | 55% | 52% | 40% | 60% | |
Brightness middle | 384 | 340 -11% | 530 38% | 443 15% | 426 11% | 382 -1% |
Brightness | 360 | 320 -11% | 513 43% | 428 19% | 399 11% | 378 5% |
Brightness Distribution | 84 | 84 0% | 92 10% | 94 12% | 91 8% | 92 10% |
Black Level * | 0.8 | 0.19 76% | 0.61 24% | 0.36 55% | 0.38 52% | 0.24 70% |
Contrast | 480 | 1789 273% | 869 81% | 1231 156% | 1121 134% | 1592 232% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 6.83 | 15 -120% | 1.2 82% | 3.3 52% | 4.5 34% | 2.8 59% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 12.7 | 22.8 -80% | 3.2 75% | 7.2 43% | 7.9 38% | 6 53% |
Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 7.5 | 4 47% | 1 87% | 2.9 61% | 5.2 31% | 3.5 53% |
Gamma | 2.199 100% | 2.09 105% | 2.28 96% | 2.27 97% | 2.23 99% | 2.33 94% |
CCT | 8544 76% | 6940 94% | 6588 99% | 6961 93% | 6875 95% | 6903 94% |
* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) décelé | 250 Hz | ≤ 15 Niveau de luminosité | |
Le rétroéclairage de l'écran scintille à la fréquence de 250 Hz (certainement du fait de l'utilisation d'une MDI - Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) à un niveau de luminosité inférieur ou égal à 15 % . Aucun scintillement ne devrait être perceptible au-dessus de cette valeur. La fréquence de rafraîchissement de 250 Hz est relativement faible, les personnes les plus sensibles devraient percevoir un scintillement et être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire accrue (avec le niveau de luminosité indiqué) En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9725 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active. |
Temps de réponse de l'écran
↔ Temps de réponse noir à blanc | ||
---|---|---|
20 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées | ↗ 9 ms hausse | |
↘ 11 ms chute | ||
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (24.4 ms) de tous les appareils testés. | ||
↔ Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80% | ||
40 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées | ↗ 21 ms hausse | |
↘ 19 ms chute | ||
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont similaires à la moyenne (38.7 ms) de tous les appareils testés. |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (124087 - 157445, n=7) | |
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 | |
Average of class Tablet (14200 - 227987, n=67) | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus |
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (170015 - 181614, n=4) | |
Apple iPad 6 2018 | |
Average of class Tablet (20856 - 566378, n=32) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 |
PCMark for Android | |
Work 2.0 performance score | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (6006 - 6299, n=7) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Average of class Tablet (4267 - 12603, n=62) | |
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 | |
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
Work performance score | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (6830 - 7403, n=7) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro | |
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 | |
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus | |
Average of class Tablet (1873 - 14982, n=98) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 |
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 | |
Compute RenderScript Score | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (9492 - 11539, n=2) | |
Average of class Tablet (840 - 43802, n=45) | |
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus | |
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (6173 - 6527, n=7) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro | |
Apple iPad 6 2018 | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Average of class Tablet (1106 - 18041, n=62) | |
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Apple iPad 6 2018 | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (1852 - 1899, n=7) | |
Average of class Tablet (429 - 5002, n=62) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 | |
Apple iPad 6 2018 | |
Apple iPad 6 2018 | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (43 - 93, n=7) | |
Average of class Tablet (1 - 451, n=199) | |
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 | |
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 | |
Apple iPad 6 2018 | |
Apple iPad 6 2018 | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (40 - 60, n=7) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Average of class Tablet (1.1 - 120, n=203) | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus | |
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL | |
Apple iPad 6 2018 | |
Apple iPad 6 2018 | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (19 - 41, n=7) | |
Average of class Tablet (1.6 - 220, n=133) | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus | |
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Apple iPad 6 2018 | |
Apple iPad 6 2018 | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (20 - 37, n=7) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Average of class Tablet (1.9 - 110, n=139) | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus | |
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Apple iPad 6 2018 | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (21 - 28, n=7) | |
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 173, n=85) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus | |
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Apple iPad 6 2018 | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (12 - 28, n=7) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro | |
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 95, n=85) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus | |
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 |
GFXBench | |
off screen Car Chase Offscreen | |
Apple iPad 6 2018 | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Average of class Tablet (1.8 - 107, n=61) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (15 - 16, n=6) | |
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus | |
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | |
on screen Car Chase Onscreen | |
Apple iPad 6 2018 | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (9.3 - 16, n=7) | |
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 47, n=61) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro | |
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus | |
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro (Chrome 68.0.3440.91) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (10016 - 11897, n=7) | |
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63) | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2) | |
Average of class Tablet (1238 - 58568, n=196) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65) | |
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus (Chrome 60) |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score | |
Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro (Chrome 68.0.3440.91) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (107 - 184, n=7) | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65) | |
Average of class Tablet (36 - 386, n=78) | |
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus (Chrome 60) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3) | |
Average of class Tablet (10.9 - 376, n=111) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (56.8 - 68.6, n=7) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro (Chrome 68.0.3440.91) | |
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63) | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65) | |
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus (Chrome 60) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score | |
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
Average of class Tablet (464 - 43092, n=208) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65) | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2) | |
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro (Chrome 68.0.3440.91) | |
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (2734 - 3734, n=7) | |
Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3) |
* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro | Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 | Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus | Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -27% | 6% | -14% | 70% | 41% | -27% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 73.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | 56.82 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -22% | 61.1 -16% | 30.14 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -59% | 73.84 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 1% | 58.1 (11.2 - 74.7, n=135) -21% | 50.6 (14 - 73.8, n=74) -31% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 84.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | 80.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -5% | 83.9 -1% | 55.49 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -35% | 85.14 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0% | 77.2 (21.1 - 87.2, n=135) -9% | 68.5 (17.6 - 87.7, n=74) -19% |
Random Write 4KB | 15.35 | 8.77 -43% | 11.8 -23% | 9.37 -39% | 60.8 296% | 28 (3.4 - 147, n=153) 82% | 11.8 (0.13 - 262, n=226) -23% |
Random Read 4KB | 27.41 | 13.7 -50% | 37.3 36% | 27.72 1% | 54.7 100% | 56.8 (11.4 - 149, n=153) 107% | 26.1 (1.04 - 230, n=226) -5% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 94.08 | 92.38 -2% | 135.5 44% | 147.67 57% | 126.8 35% | 176 (40 - 254, n=153) 87% | 57.4 (2.04 - 732, n=226) -39% |
Sequential Read 256KB | 278.59 | 173.7 -38% | 270.1 -3% | 262.2 -6% | 247.8 -11% | 273 (95.6 - 704, n=153) -2% | 151 (6.75 - 1789, n=226) -46% |
Shadow Fight 3 | |||
Paramètres | Valeur | ||
high | 60 fps |
Battle Bay | |||
Paramètres | Valeur | ||
full resolution | 60 fps |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 34.6 °C / 94 F, ranging from 22.2 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 30.6 °C / 87 F.
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Apple iPad 6 2018 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.9% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Éteint/en veille | ![]() ![]() |
Au repos | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fortement sollicité |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Légende:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro 7500 mAh | Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 6100 mAh | Apple iPad 6 2018 mAh | Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus 7000 mAh | Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 6300 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 7500 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 2% | -16% | 43% | 31% | 13% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.3 | 3.21 3% | 2.2 33% | 1.23 63% | 1.55 53% | 2.01 39% |
Idle Average * | 4.2 | 5.97 -42% | 7.8 -86% | 3.92 7% | 4.17 1% | 5.4 -29% |
Idle Maximum * | 7 | 6.19 12% | 7.9 -13% | 4.03 42% | 4.25 39% | 5.44 22% |
Load Average * | 10.4 | 9.72 7% | 12.6 -21% | 5 52% | 7.13 31% | 8.55 18% |
Load Maximum * | 13.8 | 9.97 28% | 12.8 7% | 7.09 49% | 9.63 30% | 11.53 16% |
* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro 7500 mAh | Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 6100 mAh | Apple iPad 6 2018 mAh | Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus 7000 mAh | Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 6300 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 7500 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Autonomie de la batterie | -34% | -5% | 17% | -6% | 1% | |
Reader / Idle | 1254 | 735 -41% | 1625 30% | 960 -23% | 1344 7% | |
H.264 | 629 | 795 26% | 585 -7% | 702 12% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 670 | 387 -42% | 714 7% | 647 -3% | 542 -19% | 648 -3% |
Load | 220 | 175 -20% | 185 -16% | 256 16% | 274 25% | 196 -11% |
Points positifs
Points négatifs
Résolution d’écran 2K élevée, quatre haut-parleurs Harman Kardon, bon appareil photo, bonne autonomie et charge rapide : la MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro possède toutes les qualités de la MediaPad M5 10.8. Et possède en plus trois fonctionnalités supplémentaires bienvenues : un stylet, le LTE par défaut, et un SoC légèrement plus rapide. Par rapport à ce modèle, elle possède également un meilleur GPS, mais son écran est moins bon, avec en particulier une luminosité inférieure.
L’Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro est une tablette coûteuse qui, mis à part son stylet, diffère peu de la MadiaPad M5 10.8 moins chère.
Qui a besoin d’une MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro ? Alors que la MediaPad M5 10.8 est déjà très performante, y a-t-il une vraie raison de choisir la version pro, légèrement plus rapide ? D’autant que le LTE est disponible sur le modèle moins cher, ce qui fait du Mate Pen 2 la principale raison d’un achat. Celui-ci, combiné à l’écran réactif et précis, permet une bonne expérience d’écriture, mais il a un prix : la MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro coûte 100 € de plus que la version la plus chère de la MediaPad M5 10.8.
Quelle que soit la version que vous choisissez, vous ne pouvez faire un mauvais achat. Actuellement, la MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro et la MediaPad M5 10.8 font partie des tablettes Android les plus rapides et les mieux équipées du marché.
L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro - 08/22/2018 v6(old)
Manuel Masiero