Courte critique de la tablette Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro

Name: Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
Brand: Huawei

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Florian Schmitt, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (traduit par JBP), 08/27/2018

Amélioration. Encore plus rapide, LTE par défaut, et stylet inclus : l’Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro est la version supérieure de l’excellente MadiaPad M5 10.8. Dans notre test, nous verrons si cette nouvelle tablette est aussi efficace.

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Comparaison des tailles

Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus Apple iPad 6 2018

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPad 6 2018 A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe	570 MBit/s ∼100% +142%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash	350 MBit/s ∼61% +48%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 PowerVR GX6250, MT8176, 64 GB eMMC Flash	262 MBit/s ∼46% +11%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 PowerVR GX6250, MT8173, 64 GB eMMC Flash	241 MBit/s ∼42% +2%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB eMMC Flash	236 MBit/s ∼41%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash	214 MBit/s ∼38% -9%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPad 6 2018 A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 32 GB NVMe	500 MBit/s ∼100% +110%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash	263 MBit/s ∼53% +11%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 PowerVR GX6250, MT8176, 64 GB eMMC Flash	240 MBit/s ∼48% +1%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB eMMC Flash	238 MBit/s ∼48%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash	237 MBit/s ∼47% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 PowerVR GX6250, MT8173, 64 GB eMMC Flash	227 MBit/s ∼45% -5%

GPS Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro : vue générale.

GPS Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro : verger.

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

Cliquer pour charger les images

Huawei MediaPad M5 Pro

Sony Alpha 77

Apple iPhone X

OnePlus 5T

Cliquer pour charger les images

Huawei MediaPad M5 Pro

Sony Alpha 77

Apple iPhone X

OnePlus 5T

Cliquer pour charger les images

Huawei MediaPad M5 Pro

Sony Alpha 77

Apple iPhone X

OnePlus 5T


374 cd/m²	368 cd/m²	322 cd/m²
382 cd/m²	384 cd/m²	347 cd/m²
366 cd/m²	365 cd/m²	334 cd/m²

Homogénéité de la luminosité

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 384 cd/m² Moyenne: 360.2 cd/m² Minimum: 3.39 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 84 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 384 cd/m²
Contraste: 480:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.8 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.83 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9
ΔE Greyscale 7.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.199

	Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro IPS, 2560x1600, 10.8	Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1	Apple iPad 6 2018 IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7	Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1	Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1	Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 IPS, 2560x1600, 10.8
Screen		22%	55%	52%	40%	60%
Brightness middle	384	340 -11%	530 38%	443 15%	426 11%	382 -1%
Brightness	360	320 -11%	513 43%	428 19%	399 11%	378 5%
Brightness Distribution	84	84 0%	92 10%	94 12%	91 8%	92 10%
Black Level *	0.8	0.19 76%	0.61 24%	0.36 55%	0.38 52%	0.24 70%
Contrast	480	1789 273%	869 81%	1231 156%	1121 134%	1592 232%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	6.83	15 -120%	1.2 82%	3.3 52%	4.5 34%	2.8 59%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	12.7	22.8 -80%	3.2 75%	7.2 43%	7.9 38%	6 53%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	7.5	4 47%	1 87%	2.9 61%	5.2 31%	3.5 53%
Gamma	2.199 ^100%	2.09 ^105%	2.28 ^96%	2.27 ^97%	2.23 ^99%	2.33 ^94%
CCT	8544 ^76%	6940 ^94%	6588 ^99%	6961 ^93%	6875 ^95%	6903 ^94%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

ℹ

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) décelé

250 Hz

≤ 15 Niveau de luminosité

Le rétroéclairage de l'écran scintille à la fréquence de 250 Hz (certainement du fait de l'utilisation d'une MDI - Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) à un niveau de luminosité inférieur ou égal à 15 % . Aucun scintillement ne devrait être perceptible au-dessus de cette valeur.

La fréquence de rafraîchissement de 250 Hz est relativement faible, les personnes les plus sensibles devraient percevoir un scintillement et être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire accrue (avec le niveau de luminosité indiqué)

En comparaison, 50 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 17077 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 2500000) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

ℹ

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.

↔ Temps de réponse noir à blanc
20 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↗ 9 ms hausse
20 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↘ 11 ms chute
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (24.9 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
↔ Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
40 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↗ 21 ms hausse
40 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↘ 19 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 45 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont similaires à la moyenne (39.5 ms) de tous les appareils testés.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro	157445 Points ∼54%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	147305 Points ∼50% -6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (124087 - 157445, n=7)	143408 Points ∼49% -9%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50	78980 Points ∼27% -50%
Average of class Tablet (14200 - 227987, n=67)	69584 Points ∼24% -56%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	63777 Points ∼22% -59%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus	62725 Points ∼21% -60%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro	175581 Points ∼31%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (170015 - 181614, n=4)	174560 Points ∼31% -1%
Apple iPad 6 2018	170921 Points ∼30% -3%
Average of class Tablet (20856 - 566378, n=32)	160864 Points ∼28% -8%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	113687 Points ∼20% -35%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	77717 Points ∼14% -56%

PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (6006 - 6299, n=7)	6136 Points ∼50% +2%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro	6039 Points ∼49%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	5114 Points ∼41% -15%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50	4827 Points ∼39% -20%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus	4626 Points ∼38% -23%
Average of class Tablet (4267 - 9615, n=47)	4339 Points ∼35% -28%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	3678 Points ∼30% -39%
Work performance score
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (6830 - 7403, n=7)	7199 Points ∼37% +5%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro	6830 Points ∼35%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50	5843 Points ∼30% -14%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus	5648 Points ∼29% -17%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	5040 Points ∼26% -26%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	4895 Points ∼25% -28%
Average of class Tablet (1873 - 11644, n=84)	4849 Points ∼25% -29%

BaseMark OS II
Web
Apple iPad 6 2018	1628 Points ∼80% +78%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (913 - 1215, n=7)	1076 Points ∼53% +18%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	1010 Points ∼50% +11%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro	913 Points ∼45%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus	850 Points ∼42% -7%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	811 Points ∼40% -11%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50	803 Points ∼39% -12%
Average of class Tablet (9 - 2034, n=114)	760 Points ∼37% -17%
Graphics
Apple iPad 6 2018	6760 Points ∼23% +196%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (2284 - 4143, n=7)	3731 Points ∼13% +63%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro	2284 Points ∼8%
Average of class Tablet (98 - 28853, n=115)	2245 Points ∼8% -2%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	1602 Points ∼6% -30%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus	1015 Points ∼4% -56%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	833 Points ∼3% -64%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50	701 Points ∼2% -69%
Memory
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (2778 - 4277, n=7)	3512 Points ∼47% +13%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro	3108 Points ∼41%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	2654 Points ∼35% -15%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	1513 Points ∼20% -51%
Apple iPad 6 2018	1334 Points ∼18% -57%
Average of class Tablet (56 - 5617, n=115)	1121 Points ∼15% -64%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus	972 Points ∼13% -69%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50	968 Points ∼13% -69%
System
Apple iPad 6 2018	6820 Points ∼41% +87%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (3572 - 4154, n=7)	3826 Points ∼23% +5%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro	3639 Points ∼22%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus	3214 Points ∼20% -12%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	2838 Points ∼17% -22%
Average of class Tablet (482 - 16467, n=115)	2502 Points ∼15% -31%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	2329 Points ∼14% -36%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50	1957 Points ∼12% -46%
Overall
Apple iPad 6 2018	3163 Points ∼37% +44%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (2204 - 2985, n=7)	2701 Points ∼32% +23%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro	2204 Points ∼26%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	1769 Points ∼21% -20%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	1312 Points ∼16% -40%
Average of class Tablet (150 - 8450, n=114)	1310 Points ∼16% -41%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus	1281 Points ∼15% -42%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50	1016 Points ∼12% -54%

Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	11575 Points ∼26%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (9492 - 11539, n=2)	10516 Points ∼24%
Average of class Tablet (840 - 43802, n=40)	5852 Points ∼13%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus	3235 Points ∼7%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50	3081 Points ∼7%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	1562 Points ∼4%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (6173 - 6527, n=7)	6384 Points ∼11% +3%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro	6173 Points ∼11%
Apple iPad 6 2018	5952 Points ∼10% -4%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	5809 Points ∼10% -6%
Average of class Tablet (1106 - 18041, n=57)	4592 Points ∼8% -26%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus	4323 Points ∼7% -30%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	3305 Points ∼6% -46%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50	2489 Points ∼4% -60%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Apple iPad 6 2018	3499 Points ∼55% +85%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro	1892 Points ∼30%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (1852 - 1899, n=7)	1875 Points ∼30% -1%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	1634 Points ∼26% -14%
Average of class Tablet (429 - 5002, n=57)	1627 Points ∼26% -14%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50	1541 Points ∼24% -19%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	1204 Points ∼19% -36%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus	868 Points ∼14% -54%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	2419 Points ∼49% 0%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro	2416 Points ∼49%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (1679 - 2653, n=7)	2181 Points ∼44% -10%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus	1991 Points ∼41% -18%
Average of class Tablet (729 - 3695, n=63)	1688 Points ∼34% -30%
Apple iPad 6 2018	1439 Points ∼29% -40%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	1363 Points ∼28% -44%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50	843 Points ∼17% -65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Apple iPad 6 2018	3682 Points ∼44% +124%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (1646 - 2798, n=7)	2063 Points ∼25% +25%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro	1646 Points ∼20%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	1504 Points ∼18% -9%
Average of class Tablet (55 - 6128, n=63)	1369 Points ∼16% -17%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50	557 Points ∼7% -66%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	413 Points ∼5% -75%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus	381 Points ∼5% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Apple iPad 6 2018	2735 Points ∼38% +54%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (1747 - 2666, n=7)	2064 Points ∼29% +17%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro	1771 Points ∼25%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	1642 Points ∼23% -7%
Average of class Tablet (70 - 5346, n=65)	1275 Points ∼18% -28%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50	602 Points ∼8% -66%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	489 Points ∼7% -72%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus	464 Points ∼6% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	2445 Points ∼48% +3%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro	2366 Points ∼47%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (1662 - 2555, n=7)	2086 Points ∼41% -12%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus	2031 Points ∼40% -14%
Average of class Tablet (56 - 3678, n=68)	1578 Points ∼31% -33%
Apple iPad 6 2018	1535 Points ∼30% -35%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	1347 Points ∼27% -43%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50	1128 Points ∼22% -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Apple iPad 6 2018	6095 Points ∼53% +155%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (1856 - 2990, n=7)	2496 Points ∼22% +4%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro	2392 Points ∼21%
Average of class Tablet (42 - 10647, n=68)	1917 Points ∼17% -20%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	1719 Points ∼15% -28%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50	884 Points ∼8% -63%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus	731 Points ∼6% -69%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	598 Points ∼5% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Apple iPad 6 2018	3672 Points ∼41% +54%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro	2386 Points ∼27%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (1865 - 2649, n=7)	2374 Points ∼27% -1%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	1840 Points ∼21% -23%
Average of class Tablet (53 - 6997, n=69)	1566 Points ∼18% -34%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50	929 Points ∼10% -61%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus	852 Points ∼10% -64%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	682 Points ∼8% -71%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus	15850 Points ∼18% +10%
Apple iPad 6 2018	15499 Points ∼18% +7%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	15117 Points ∼17% +5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (14456 - 15341, n=6)	15019 Points ∼17% +4%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	14698 Points ∼17% +2%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro	14456 Points ∼17%
Average of class Tablet (3675 - 51374, n=161)	13506 Points ∼16% -7%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50	9729 Points ∼11% -33%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Apple iPad 6 2018	62626 Points ∼12% +79%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	35210 Points ∼7% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (32243 - 38979, n=6)	35199 Points ∼7% 0%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro	35076 Points ∼7%
Average of class Tablet (2109 - 194856, n=161)	20616 Points ∼4% -41%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus	13239 Points ∼2% -62%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	12771 Points ∼2% -64%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50	11719 Points ∼2% -67%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Apple iPad 6 2018	37372 Points ∼16% +40%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (25766 - 28883, n=6)	27083 Points ∼11% +2%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	26875 Points ∼11% +1%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro	26634 Points ∼11%
Average of class Tablet (2411 - 106954, n=162)	16234 Points ∼7% -39%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus	13742 Points ∼6% -48%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	13227 Points ∼6% -50%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50	11209 Points ∼5% -58%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Apple iPad 6 2018	125 fps ∼1% +34%
Apple iPad 6 2018	118 fps ∼1% +27%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	96 fps ∼1% +3%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro	93 fps ∼1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (43 - 93, n=7)	68.4 fps ∼1% -26%
Average of class Tablet (1 - 451, n=184)	33.3 fps ∼0% -64%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus	23 fps ∼0% -75%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	22 fps ∼0% -76%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50	18 fps ∼0% -81%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Apple iPad 6 2018	59.7 fps ∼2% +5%
Apple iPad 6 2018	59 fps ∼2% +4%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro	57 fps ∼2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (40 - 60, n=7)	53.9 fps ∼2% -5%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	40 fps ∼1% -30%
Average of class Tablet (1.1 - 120, n=188)	21.7 fps ∼1% -62%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	21 fps ∼1% -63%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus	20 fps ∼1% -65%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50	17 fps ∼1% -70%

GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Apple iPad 6 2018	62.6 fps ∼10% +53%
Apple iPad 6 2018	58.9 fps ∼9% +44%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	44 fps ∼7% +7%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro	41 fps ∼7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (19 - 41, n=7)	31.7 fps ∼5% -23%
Average of class Tablet (1.6 - 220, n=118)	22.6 fps ∼4% -45%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	9.9 fps ∼2% -76%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus	9.8 fps ∼2% -76%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50	8.5 fps ∼1% -79%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPad 6 2018	40.9 fps ∼11% +51%
Apple iPad 6 2018	40.3 fps ∼11% +49%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (20 - 37, n=7)	28.1 fps ∼8% +4%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro	27 fps ∼7%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	26 fps ∼7% -4%
Average of class Tablet (1.9 - 110, n=124)	15.5 fps ∼4% -43%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	9.5 fps ∼3% -65%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus	9.2 fps ∼3% -66%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50	8.3 fps ∼2% -69%

GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad 6 2018	42.7 fps ∼1% +53%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro	28 fps ∼1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (21 - 28, n=7)	24 fps ∼1% -14%
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 173, n=70)	20.5 fps ∼0% -27%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	18 fps ∼0% -36%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus	6.4 fps ∼0% -77%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50	6 fps ∼0% -79%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	4.9 fps ∼0% -82%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad 6 2018	27.3 fps ∼1% +71%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (12 - 28, n=7)	18.6 fps ∼1% +16%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro	16 fps ∼0%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	15 fps ∼0% -6%
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 95, n=70)	13.2 fps ∼0% -17%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus	6 fps ∼0% -62%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50	5.7 fps ∼0% -64%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	4.7 fps ∼0% -71%

GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad 6 2018	26.8 fps ∼6% +68%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	18 fps ∼4% +13%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro	16 fps ∼4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (15 - 16, n=6)	15.3 fps ∼4% -4%
Average of class Tablet (1.8 - 107, n=46)	14.7 fps ∼3% -8%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus	3.5 fps ∼1% -78%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50	3 fps ∼1% -81%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	2 fps ∼0% -87%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad 6 2018	17.9 fps ∼7% +92%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (9.3 - 16, n=7)	12.2 fps ∼5% +31%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	10 fps ∼4% +8%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro	9.3 fps ∼4%
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 47, n=46)	8.82 fps ∼3% -5%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus	3.3 fps ∼1% -65%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50	3.1 fps ∼1% -67%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	2 fps ∼1% -78%

Légende

Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 Mediatek MT8176, PowerVR GX6250, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Apple iPad 6 2018 Apple A10 Fusion, Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR, 32 GB NVMe

Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 Mediatek MT8173, PowerVR GX6250, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 HiSilicon Kirin 960s, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Average HiSilicon Kirin 960

Average of class Tablet

Octane V2 | WebXPRT 2015 | JetStream 1.1 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3)	27967 Points ∼100% +136%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro (Chrome 68.0.3440.91)	11854 Points ∼42%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (10016 - 11897, n=7)	10823 Points ∼39% -9%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63)	8897 Points ∼32% -25%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)	8570 Points ∼31% -28%
Average of class Tablet (1238 - 45734, n=178)	6938 Points ∼25% -41%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)	6802 Points ∼24% -43%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus (Chrome 60)	4502 Points ∼16% -62%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3)	200 Points ∼100% +12%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro (Chrome 68.0.3440.91)	178 Points ∼89%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (107 - 184, n=7)	148 Points ∼74% -17%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)	137 Points ∼69% -23%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)	116 Points ∼58% -35%
Average of class Tablet (36 - 386, n=77)	114 Points ∼57% -36%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus (Chrome 60)	93 Points ∼47% -48%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3)	167.2 Points ∼100% +193%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (56.8 - 68.6, n=7)	59.3 Points ∼35% +4%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro (Chrome 68.0.3440.91)	57.007 Points ∼34%
Average of class Tablet (10.9 - 279, n=92)	53 Points ∼32% -7%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63)	47.337 Points ∼28% -17%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)	46.39 Points ∼28% -19%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)	36.127 Points ∼22% -37%
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus (Chrome 60)	25.761 Points ∼15% -55%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus (Chrome 60)	9236.5 ms * ∼100% -158%
Average of class Tablet (603 - 43092, n=189)	9175 ms * ∼99% -157%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)	5947 ms * ∼64% -66%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)	3975.5 ms * ∼43% -11%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63)	3756.1 ms * ∼41% -5%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro (Chrome 68.0.3440.91)	3575.4 ms * ∼39%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 960 (2734 - 3734, n=7)	3226 ms * ∼35% +10%
Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3)	1025.5 ms * ∼11% +71%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

	Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro	Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50	Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus	Amazon Fire HD 10 2017	Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8	Average 64 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		-27%	6%	-14%	70%	37%	-41%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	73.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	56.82 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -22%	61.1 -16%	30.14 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -59%	73.84 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 1%	57.9 (11.2 - 74.7, n=112) -21%	47.2 (14 - 73.8, n=60) -35%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	84.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	80.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -5%	83.9 -1%	55.49 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -35%	85.14 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	76.9 (21.1 - 87.2, n=112) -9%	65.2 (17.6 - 87.7, n=60) -23%
Random Write 4KB	15.35	8.77 -43%	11.8 -23%	9.37 -39%	60.8 296%	25.5 (3.4 - 125, n=127) 66%	7.02 (0.13 - 170, n=211) -54%
Random Read 4KB	27.41	13.7 -50%	37.3 36%	27.72 1%	54.7 100%	55.8 (11.4 - 149, n=127) 104%	20.9 (1.04 - 192, n=211) -24%
Sequential Write 256KB	94.08	92.38 -2%	135.5 44%	147.67 57%	126.8 35%	172 (40 - 254, n=127) 83%	44.4 (2.04 - 522, n=211) -53%
Sequential Read 256KB	278.59	173.7 -38%	270.1 -3%	262.2 -6%	247.8 -11%	274 (95.6 - 704, n=127) -2%	121 (6.75 - 1416, n=211) -57%

Shadow Fight 3
	Paramètres	Valeur
	high	60 fps

Battle Bay
	Paramètres	Valeur
	full resolution	60 fps

... en comparaison [FPS]

A pleine charge

Au repos/à faible charge


33.8 °C	37.1 °C	33.2 °C
33.6 °C	34.6 °C	33.4 °C
34.1 °C	33.4 °C	32.5 °C

Maximum: 37.1 °C
Moyenne: 34 °C


34.5 °C	39.5 °C	36 °C
33.8 °C	35.7 °C	34.9 °C
33.2 °C	34.3 °C	34.4 °C

Maximum: 39.5 °C
Moyenne: 35.1 °C

Alimentation (valeur maximale) 42.2 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 22.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 30.6 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 34.7 °C / 94 F, ranging from 22.2 to 51.8 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 30.6 °C / 87 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple iPad 6 2018 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.9% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consommation énergétique

Éteint/en veille	0.06 / 0.1 Watts
Au repos	3.3 / 4.2 / 7 Watts
Fortement sollicité	10.4 / 13.8 Watts


Légende: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro 7500 mAh	Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 6100 mAh	Apple iPad 6 2018 mAh	Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus 7000 mAh	Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 6300 mAh	Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 7500 mAh
Power Consumption		2%	-16%	43%	31%	13%
Idle Minimum *	3.3	3.21 3%	2.2 33%	1.23 63%	1.55 53%	2.01 39%
Idle Average *	4.2	5.97 -42%	7.8 -86%	3.92 7%	4.17 1%	5.4 -29%
Idle Maximum *	7	6.19 12%	7.9 -13%	4.03 42%	4.25 39%	5.44 22%
Load Average *	10.4	9.72 7%	12.6 -21%	5 52%	7.13 31%	8.55 18%
Load Maximum *	13.8	9.97 28%	12.8 7%	7.09 49%	9.63 30%	11.53 16%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie

Au repos (module WiFi éteint, luminosité au minimum)		20h 54min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		11h 10min
En lecture de Big Buck Bunny encodé en H.264 1080p		10h 29min
Fortement sollicité (luminosité au maximum)		3h 40min

	Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro 7500 mAh	Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 6100 mAh	Apple iPad 6 2018 mAh	Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus 7000 mAh	Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 6300 mAh	Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 7500 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie		-34%	-5%	17%	-6%	1%
Reader / Idle	1254	735 -41%		1625 30%	960 -23%	1344 7%
H.264	629			795 26%	585 -7%	702 12%
WiFi v1.3	670	387 -42%	714 7%	647 -3%	542 -19%	648 -3%
Load	220	175 -20%	185 -16%	256 16%	274 25%	196 -11%

Points positifs

+ excellente qualité de construction

+ LTE Cat. 6

+ stockage de 64 Go

+ 4 haut-parleurs

+ Android 8.0

+ écran haute résolution

+ bon appareil photo

+ très rapide

+ stylet digital

+ reste frais

+ bonne autonomie

+ charge rapide

Points négatifs

- pas de jack 3,5 mm

- l'OS prend beaucoup de place

- Wifi pas spécialement rapide

- bloatwares préinstallés

- USB 3.0 avec des vitesses d'USB 2.0

- faible luminosité

- throttling en cas de sollicitations

En test : le Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro. Modèle de test fourni par Huawei Allemagne.

Résolution d’écran 2K élevée, quatre haut-parleurs Harman Kardon, bon appareil photo, bonne autonomie et charge rapide : la MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro possède toutes les qualités de la MediaPad M5 10.8. Et possède en plus trois fonctionnalités supplémentaires bienvenues : un stylet, le LTE par défaut, et un SoC légèrement plus rapide. Par rapport à ce modèle, elle possède également un meilleur GPS, mais son écran est moins bon, avec en particulier une luminosité inférieure.

L’Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro est une tablette coûteuse qui, mis à part son stylet, diffère peu de la MadiaPad M5 10.8 moins chère.

Qui a besoin d’une MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro ? Alors que la MediaPad M5 10.8 est déjà très performante, y a-t-il une vraie raison de choisir la version pro, légèrement plus rapide ? D’autant que le LTE est disponible sur le modèle moins cher, ce qui fait du Mate Pen 2 la principale raison d’un achat. Celui-ci, combiné à l’écran réactif et précis, permet une bonne expérience d’écriture, mais il a un prix : la MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro coûte 100 € de plus que la version la plus chère de la MediaPad M5 10.8.

Quelle que soit la version que vous choisissez, vous ne pouvez faire un mauvais achat. Actuellement, la MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro et la MediaPad M5 10.8 font partie des tablettes Android les plus rapides et les mieux équipées du marché.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro - 2018-08-2208/22/2018 v6^(old)
Manuel Masiero

Châssis

85%

Clavier

71 / 80 → 89%

Dispositif de pointage

93%

Connectivité

48 / 65 → 73%

Poids

83 / 40-88 → 90%

Autonomie

93%

Écran

79%

Performances en jeu

55 / 68 → 81%

Performances dans les applications

59 / 76 → 77%

Chauffe

90%

Nuisance sonore

100%

Audio

76 / 91 → 84%

Appareil photo

68 / 85 → 79%

Moyenne

77%

88%

Tablet - Moyenne compensée

Courte critique de la tablette Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro

Comparaison des tailles

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro audio analysis

Apple iPad 6 2018 audio analysis

Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 audio analysis

Points positifs

Points négatifs

Pricecompare