Notebookcheck

Courte critique du PC portable de jeu Gigabyte Sabre 17 (i7-8750H, GTX 1060, FHD)

Christian Hintze, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, ✓ Felicitas Krohn (traduit par Prévots), 11/04/2018

Epée à deux tranchants. Le gros Sabre de 17 pouces de Gigabyte vient avec une promesse, celle de combiner un nouveau processeur hexacœur puissant et une GTX 1060, ce qui en fait un remplaçant d’ordinateur de bureau complet, avec des capacités de jeu sans compromis. Le Sabre 17 tient-il sa promesse, ou s’arrête-t-il à mi-chemin ?

Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8 (Sabre Gamme)
Processeur
Intel Core i7-8750H
Carte graphique
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile - 6144 Mo, Geforce 398.82, Ja, UHD Graphics 630
Mémoire
16384 Mo 
, PC4-19200 DDR4, 1 emplacement
Écran
17.3 pouces 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPP, non, Chi Mei CMN1747, TN, 120 Hz, brillant: non
Carte mère
Intel Cannon Lake HM370
Disque dur
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, 256 Go 
, plus HDD 1 To HGST HTS721010A9E630 7200 tr/min, 190 Go libres
Carte son
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Encoche de Sécurité Kensington, Connectique audio: 1 entrée micro, 1 sortie écouteurs, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: full SD
Réseau
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth Bluetooth V5.0
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 29.9 x 418.5 x 288.7
Batterie
62 Wh, 5500 mAh Lithium-Ion, Amovible
Système d'exploitation
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Appareil photo
Webcam: webcam HD
Appareil photo primaire: 1 MPix 720p
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: stéréo, Clavier: chiclet, Rétroéclairage du clavier: oui, 24 Mois Garantie
Poids
2.929 kg, Alimentation: 809 g
Prix
1 500 Euro
Liens
Gigabyte Page d'accueil
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Top 10
» Le Top 10 des PC portables multimédia 
» Le Top 10 des PC portables de jeu
» Le Top 10 des PC portables de jeu légers
» Le Top 10 des ordinateurs portables bureautiques
» Le Top 10 des PC portables bureautiques premium/professionnels 
» Le Top 10 des Stations de travail mobiles
» Le Top 10 des Ultraportables
» Le Top 10 des Ultrabooks
» Le Top 10 des Convertibles
» Le Top 10 des Tablettes
» Le Top 10 des Tablettes Windows
» Le Top 10 des Smartphones
» Le Top 10 des PC Portables á moins de 300 euros
» Le Top 10 des PC Portables á moins de 500 euros
» Le Top 25 des meilleurs écrans d'ordinateurs

Comparaison des tailles

419 mm 287 mm 32 mm 2.8 kg418.5 mm 288.7 mm 29.9 mm 2.9 kg424 mm 281 mm 22.5 mm 3.1 kg414 mm 279.4 mm 23.9 mm 2.9 kg400 mm 279 mm 27 mm 2.8 kg
Côté gauche : Kensington, entrée secteur, 2 mini DisplayPort, HDMI, USB C (3.1), USB A (3.1).
Côté gauche : Kensington, entrée secteur, 2 mini DisplayPort, HDMI, USB C (3.1), USB A (3.1).
Côté droit : écouteurs, micro, USB-A (2.0), USB-A (3.1), grille de ventilateur.
Côté droit : écouteurs, micro, USB-A (2.0), USB-A (3.1), grille de ventilateur.
A l'arrière : grille de ventilateur.
A l'arrière : grille de ventilateur.
A l'avant : aucune connectivité.
A l'avant : aucune connectivité.
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
84.8 MB/s ∼100% +12%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76 MB/s ∼90%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
69.2 MB/s ∼82% -9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (11.2 - 190, n=194)
59.4 MB/s ∼70% -22%
MSI GP72VR 7RFX
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
25.6 MB/s ∼30% -66%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
90.7 MB/s ∼100% +7%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
84.8 MB/s ∼93%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
83.2 MB/s ∼92% -2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (10.2 - 253, n=190)
75.1 MB/s ∼83% -11%
MSI GP72VR 7RFX
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26.85 MB/s ∼30% -68%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus TUF FX705GM
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
681 MBit/s ∼100% +93%
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
657 MBit/s ∼96% +86%
Average of class Multimedia
  (44 - 1431, n=162)
541 MBit/s ∼79% +53%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
424 MBit/s ∼62% +20%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
353 (min: 343, max: 359) MBit/s ∼52%
MSI GP72VR 7RFX
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
330 MBit/s ∼48% -7%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus TUF FX705GM
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
692 MBit/s ∼100% +111%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
589 MBit/s ∼85% +80%
Average of class Multimedia
  (46.1 - 1563, n=161)
521 MBit/s ∼75% +59%
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
448 MBit/s ∼65% +37%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
328 (min: 311, max: 338) MBit/s ∼47%
MSI GP72VR 7RFX
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
309 (min: 33) MBit/s ∼45% -6%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø353 (343-359)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø328 (311-338)
333
cd/m²		323
cd/m²		336
cd/m²
289
cd/m²		326
cd/m²		286
cd/m²
277
cd/m²		306
cd/m²		302
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
Chi Mei CMN1747
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 336 cd/m² Moyenne: 308.7 cd/m² Minimum: 20.5 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 82 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 327 cd/m²
Contraste: 1207:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 9.11 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9, calibrated: 2.62
ΔE Greyscale 11.17 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 76% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.28
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
Chi Mei CMN1747, , 1920x1080, 17.3		Asus TUF FX705GM
AU Optronics B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), , 1920x1080, 17.3		Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
Chi Mei CMN1747 M173JJE-G32, , 1920x1080, 17.3		Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
ID: AUO169D, Name: AU Optronics B173HAN01.6, , 1920x1080, 17.3		MSI GP72VR 7RFX
CMN1747, , 1920x1080, 17.3
Response Times
-4%
4%
-337%
-53%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
9 (5, 4)
7.4 (3.8, 3.6)
18%
8.8 (4.4, 4.4)
2%
36.8 (19.6, 17.2)
-309%
21.6 (12, 9.6)
-140%
Response Time Black / White *
8 (6, 2)
10 (4.8, 5.2)
-25%
7.4 (5.2, 2.2)
7%
37.2 (21.6, 15.6)
-365%
9.4 (7.6, 1.8)
-18%
PWM Frequency
25000 (20)
25510 (15)
2%
25000 (20)
0%
Screen
18%
10%
13%
-72%
Brightness middle
326
234
-28%
297.8
-9%
367.4
13%
309
-5%
Brightness
309
228
-26%
285
-8%
363
17%
290
-6%
Brightness Distribution
82
85
4%
84
2%
86
5%
88
7%
Black Level *
0.27
0.2
26%
0.33
-22%
0.32
-19%
0.22
19%
Contrast
1207
1170
-3%
902
-25%
1148
-5%
1405
16%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
9.11
2.16
76%
3.68
60%
3.8
58%
7.2
21%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
14.14
3.39
76%
7.71
45%
10.4
26%
12.8
9%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.62
2.02
23%
2.71
-3%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
11.17
2
82%
5
55%
3.5
69%
98
-777%
Gamma
2.28 96%
2.46 89%
2.06 107%
2.18 101%
1.96 112%
CCT
12475 52%
6394 102%
6728 97%
6467 101%
10963 59%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
76
58
-24%
84.77
12%
58.1
-24%
77
1%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
89
-11%
99.97
0%
89.3
-11%
100
0%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
7% / 14%
7% / 8%
-162% / -45%
-63% / -67%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Temps de réponse de l'écran

ℹ
Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
   ↔    Temps de réponse noir à blanc
8 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 6 ms hausse
↘ 2 ms chute
L'écran montre de faibles temps de réponse, un bon écran pour jouer.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (24.8 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
   ↔    Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
9 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 5 ms hausse
↘ 4 ms chute
L'écran montre de faibles temps de réponse, un bon écran pour jouer.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (39.4 ms) de tous les appareils testés.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

ℹ
Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) décelé 25000 Hz ≤ 20 Niveau de luminosité

Le rétroéclairage de l'écran scintille à la fréquence de 25000 Hz (certainement du fait de l'utilisation d'une MDI - Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) à un niveau de luminosité inférieur ou égal à 20 % . Aucun scintillement ne devrait être perceptible au-dessus de cette valeur.

La fréquence de rafraîchissement de 25000 Hz est élevée, la grande majorité des utilisateurs ne devrait pas percevoir de scintillements et être sujette à une fatigue oculaire accrue.

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 18242 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 2500000) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

 
01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120113011401150116011701180119012001210Tooltip
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1041 (976.49-1204.86)
Asus TUF FX705GM Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1022 (992.14-1137)
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø935 (926.78-1026.8)
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus TUF FX705GM
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points ∼100% +3%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (163 - 177, n=86)
172 Points ∼98% +1%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
Intel Core i7-8750H
170 Points ∼97%
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
Intel Core i7-8750H
168 Points ∼96% -1%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
160 Points ∼91% -6%
MSI GP72VR 7RFX
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
158 Points ∼90% -7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (36 - 201, n=396)
131 Points ∼75% -23%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
Intel Core i7-8750H
1239 Points ∼100%
Asus TUF FX705GM
Intel Core i7-8750H
1137 Points ∼92% -8%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (863 - 1251, n=93)
1107 Points ∼89% -11%
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
Intel Core i7-8750H
1015 Points ∼82% -18%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
733 Points ∼59% -41%
MSI GP72VR 7RFX
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
714 Points ∼58% -42%
Average of class Multimedia
  (72.4 - 1550, n=413)
510 Points ∼41% -59%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus TUF FX705GM
Intel Core i7-8750H
2 Points ∼100% 0%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
Intel Core i7-8750H
2 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (1.89 - 2, n=40)
1.967 Points ∼98% -2%
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.92 Points ∼96% -4%
MSI GP72VR 7RFX
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.77 Points ∼89% -11%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.66 Points ∼83% -17%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.39 - 2.28, n=419)
1.297 Points ∼65% -35%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
Intel Core i7-8750H
13.5 Points ∼100%
Asus TUF FX705GM
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.79 Points ∼95% -5%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (9.54 - 13.5, n=41)
12.2 Points ∼90% -10%
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
Intel Core i7-8750H
11.2 Points ∼83% -17%
MSI GP72VR 7RFX
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7.99 Points ∼59% -41%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7.14 Points ∼53% -47%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.59 - 17.6, n=685)
3.77 Points ∼28% -72%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
Intel Core i7-8750H
8594 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (8472 - 8665, n=5)
8542 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1011 - 9435, n=513)
4459 Points ∼52% -48%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
Intel Core i7-8750H
45795 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (33944 - 46384, n=5)
42290 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1968 - 45795, n=513)
12050 Points ∼26% -74%
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
7341 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
45795 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
8594 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
13.5 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
71.59 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
102.11 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1239 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
170 Points
Aide
PCMark 8 | PCMark 10
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
5719 Points ∼100% +7%
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5528 Points ∼97% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
  (5111 - 5731, n=15)
5504 Points ∼96% +3%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
5340 Points ∼93%
MSI GP72VR 7RFX
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5160 Points ∼90% -3%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP
5159 Points ∼90% -3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2213 - 5651, n=299)
4330 Points ∼76% -19%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5371 Points ∼100% +27%
Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
4660 Points ∼87% +10%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
  (4119 - 5371, n=15)
4511 Points ∼84% +7%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
4231 Points ∼79%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP
4207 Points ∼78% -1%
MSI GP72VR 7RFX
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
4075 Points ∼76% -4%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1371 - 4900, n=320)
3393 Points ∼63% -20%
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
6828 Points ∼100% +17%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
  (5452 - 6828, n=14)
6127 Points ∼90% +5%
Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
6071 Points ∼89% +4%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
5823 Points ∼85%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP
5819 Points ∼85% 0%
MSI GP72VR 7RFX
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5558 Points ∼81% -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1001 - 7161, n=124)
3754 Points ∼55% -36%
Productivity
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
7511 Points ∼100% +5%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
  (6917 - 7592, n=14)
7154 Points ∼95% 0%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
7140 Points ∼95%
Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
7025 Points ∼94% -2%
MSI GP72VR 7RFX
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
6641 Points ∼88% -7%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP
6481 Points ∼86% -9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1407 - 8020, n=125)
6304 Points ∼84% -12%
Essentials
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
8923 Points ∼100% +6%
Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
8791 Points ∼99% +5%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
8400 Points ∼94%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
  (7200 - 9101, n=14)
8386 Points ∼94% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2891 - 10539, n=125)
7748 Points ∼87% -8%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP
7724 Points ∼87% -8%
MSI GP72VR 7RFX
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
7316 Points ∼82% -13%
Score
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5525 Points ∼100% +9%
Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
5169 Points ∼94% +2%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
  (4646 - 5525, n=14)
5132 Points ∼93% +2%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
5049 Points ∼91%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP
4752 Points ∼86% -6%
MSI GP72VR 7RFX
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
4633 Points ∼84% -8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1144 - 5500, n=126)
4044 Points ∼73% -20%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4231 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5340 points
Aide
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7		Asus TUF FX705GM
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G		Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP		Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP		MSI GP72VR 7RFX
Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e		Average Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
9%
2%
-3%
51%
11%
Write 4K
104.7
104.2
0%
87.81
-16%
155.1
48%
186
78%
108 (105 - 110, n=2)
3%
Read 4K
37.39
41.46
11%
38.41
3%
44.22
18%
55.6
49%
38.8 (37.4 - 40.1, n=2)
4%
Write Seq
865.7
1295
50%
1177
36%
311.2
-64%
1599
85%
625 (384 - 866, n=2)
-28%
Read Seq
944.1
1325
40%
867.8
-8%
1247
32%
999.3
6%
733 (522 - 944, n=2)
-22%
Write 4K Q32T1
293.3
282.8
-4%
266.5
-9%
310.3
6%
493.3
68%
465 (293 - 638, n=2)
59%
Read 4K Q32T1
374.3
321.3
-14%
307.1
-18%
551.2
47%
556.2
49%
636 (374 - 898, n=2)
70%
Write Seq Q32T1
1064
1301
22%
1212
14%
311.5
-71%
1674
57%
1109 (1064 - 1154, n=2)
4%
Read Seq Q32T1
2616
1704
-35%
3006
15%
1560
-40%
3083
18%
2504 (2392 - 2616, n=2)
-4%
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
hddimg
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
Sequential Read: 947.2 MB/s
Sequential Write: 881.3 MB/s
512K Read: 556.8 MB/s
512K Write: 597.4 MB/s
4K Read: 7.187 MB/s
4K Write: 84.3 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 342.4 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 255.2 MB/s
3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GP72VR 7RFX
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ
15161 Points ∼100% +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
  (12620 - 15607, n=77)
14692 Points ∼97% +1%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H
14534 Points ∼96%
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H
14528 Points ∼96% 0%
Asus TUF FX705GM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H
13722 Points ∼91% -6%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ
13668 Points ∼90% -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (352 - 20837, n=660)
3132 Points ∼21% -78%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GP72VR 7RFX
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ
11870 Points ∼100% +1%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H
11752 Points ∼99%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
  (10708 - 12298, n=77)
11547 Points ∼97% -2%
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H
11469 Points ∼97% -2%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ
11049 Points ∼93% -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (337 - 16100, n=437)
3026 Points ∼25% -74%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H
81912 Points ∼100% +16%
MSI GP72VR 7RFX
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ
81711 Points ∼100% +16%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ
77354 Points ∼94% +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
  (26770 - 86193, n=68)
71237 Points ∼87% +1%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H
70496 Points ∼86%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2468 - 77755, n=435)
17423 Points ∼21% -75%
3DMark 11 Performance
12678 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
30202 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
10404 points
Aide

The Witcher 3 framerate graph

010203040Tooltip
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7: Ø29 (2-31)
The Witcher 3 | Rise of the Tomb Raider | Doom
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
41 fps ∼100% +71%
MSI GP72VR 7RFX
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
40 fps ∼98% +67%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
  (24 - 42.3, n=60)
38.6 fps ∼94% +61%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP
38.3 fps ∼93% +60%
Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
36.5 fps ∼89% +52%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
24 fps ∼59%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2.9 - 80.8, n=115)
20.3 fps ∼50% -15%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
  (52.6 - 80.6, n=49)
68 fps ∼100% +26%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP
66.4 fps ∼98% +23%
Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
66.2 fps ∼97% +23%
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
58.78 fps ∼86% +9%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
53.9 fps ∼79%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3.8 - 117, n=124)
30.8 fps ∼45% -43%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
134.3 fps ∼100% +46%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
  (91.7 - 139, n=16)
126 fps ∼94% +37%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
91.7 fps ∼68%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.2 - 206, n=120)
47.2 fps ∼35% -49%
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
200.7 fps ∼100% +53%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
  (130 - 207, n=17)
177 fps ∼88% +35%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
131.3 fps ∼65%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8.9 - 296, n=124)
69.8 fps ∼35% -47%
Rise of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
64 fps ∼100% +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
  (51 - 68.8, n=37)
61.3 fps ∼96% +1%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
60.9 fps ∼95%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP
58.7 fps ∼92% -4%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1.8 - 88, n=83)
25.3 fps ∼40% -58%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
76 fps ∼100% +2%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
74.4 fps ∼98%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
  (65.3 - 82, n=24)
73.3 fps ∼96% -1%
Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP
71.6 fps ∼94% -4%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2.5 - 107, n=102)
27.3 fps ∼36% -63%
1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
140 fps ∼100% +70%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
  (82.2 - 140, n=14)
121 fps ∼86% +47%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
82.2 fps ∼59%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.3 - 160, n=110)
38.2 fps ∼27% -54%
1024x768 Lowest Preset
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
183.8 fps ∼100% +62%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
  (106 - 203, n=15)
153 fps ∼83% +35%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
113.4 fps ∼62%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9.4 - 202, n=107)
58.4 fps ∼32% -49%
Doom
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
  (66 - 103, n=17)
90.5 fps ∼100% +37%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
66 fps ∼73%
Average of class Multimedia
  (12 - 117, n=16)
39.2 fps ∼43% -41%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
  (68.6 - 102, n=6)
91.5 fps ∼100% +33%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
68.6 fps ∼75%
Average of class Multimedia
  (7.9 - 125, n=25)
30.3 fps ∼33% -56%
1920x1080 Medium Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
  (72.3 - 110, n=3)
96.5 fps ∼100% +33%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
72.3 fps ∼75%
Average of class Multimedia
  (27.1 - 127, n=4)
70.1 fps ∼73% -3%
1366x768 Medium Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
  (116 - 146, n=3)
129 fps ∼100% +12%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
115.5 fps ∼90%
Average of class Multimedia
  (12.8 - 134, n=21)
44.5 fps ∼34% -61%
1280x720 Low Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
  (121 - 155, n=3)
136 fps ∼100% +12%
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
121.4 fps ∼89%
Average of class Multimedia
  (16.8 - 138, n=27)
52.4 fps ∼39% -57%
Bas Moyen Élevé Ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 131.3 91.7 53.9 24 fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 113.4 82.2 74.4 60.9 fps
Doom (2016) 121.4 115.5 68.6 66 fps
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7		Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G		Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP		Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP		MSI GP72VR 7RFX
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
Noise
-7%
4%
9%
2%
off / environment *
30.5
29
5%
28.6
6%
28.1
8%
28.3
7%
Idle Minimum *
32.1
32
-0%
29.4
8%
29.5
8%
29.2
9%
Idle Average *
32.1
33
-3%
29.4
8%
29.6
8%
29.2
9%
Idle Maximum *
32.3
44
-36%
33.7
-4%
29.6
8%
37
-15%
Load Average *
42.9
46
-7%
41.2
4%
31.6
26%
43.7
-2%
Load Maximum *
48.8
50
-2%
48.3
1%
51.8
-6%
46.4
5%
Witcher 3 ultra *
48
47.3
46
45.7

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Degré de la nuisance sonore

Au repos
32.1 / 32.1 / 32.3 dB(A)
Disque dur
32.4 dB(A)
Fortement sollicité
42.9 / 48.8 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencieux
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
bruyant
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (à 15 cm de distance)   environment noise: 30.5 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.83332.231.631.82535.53129.731.335.53133.532.431.431.133.54033.332.428.929.433.35029.829.829.531.829.86329.433.627.927.529.48027.829.426.326.527.810025.327.5262525.312526.727.625.424.426.716025.426.524.923.625.420026.328.523.222.526.325026.929.422.522.126.931528.732.721.621.628.740028.532.120.820.228.550026.729.720.119.726.763028322018.92880029.934.420.518.229.9100032.136.420.617.832.1125034.238.620.917.734.2160032.536.32117.432.5200032.637.220.317.932.625003337.519.417.933315033.538.820.417.933.5400030.936.119.218.230.9500026.732.218.718.126.7630021.926.618.718.521.9800020.224.518.518.520.21000019.421.918.618.519.4125001919.518.518.3191600019.318.918.518.319.3SPL4347.532.130.543N3.85.41.51.33.8median 26.9median 32median 20.4median 18.5median 26.9Delta3.94.51.61.93.9hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseGigabyte Sabre 17-W8
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7		Asus TUF FX705GM
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G		Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP		Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP		MSI GP72VR 7RFX
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
Heat
-27%
-27%
-8%
-35%
Maximum Upper Side *
35
54
-54%
54.6
-56%
48.2
-38%
53.8
-54%
Maximum Bottom *
34.3
53
-55%
41.2
-20%
43.2
-26%
52.2
-52%
Idle Upper Side *
30.1
30
-0%
35
-16%
25.4
16%
37.2
-24%
Idle Bottom *
30.5
30
2%
35.2
-15%
25.8
15%
34
-11%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

A pleine charge
 32.4 °C34.4 °C26 °C 
 33.6 °C35 °C30.1 °C 
 33.1 °C34.6 °C26.7 °C 
Maximum: 35 °C
Moyenne: 31.8 °C
28.3 °C24.6 °C34.1 °C
31.5 °C34.3 °C32.3 °C
24.7 °C29.6 °C30.5 °C
Maximum: 34.3 °C
Moyenne: 30 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  38.6 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 22.4 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 30.9 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 36.5 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 38.8 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 30.9 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.6 °C / 94.3 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29 °C / 84.2 F (-5.6 °C / -10.1 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.931.631.92532.831.332.83131.931.131.94029.529.429.55029.431.829.46327.527.527.58027.126.527.110025.92525.912526.824.426.81602723.62720024.822.524.825030.822.130.831539.221.639.240047.220.247.250049.119.749.163056.218.956.280064.418.264.4100069.217.869.2125065.117.765.1160063.617.463.6200061.717.961.7250063.317.963.331506917.969400068.118.268.1500059.518.159.563005018.550800046.118.546.11000054.918.554.91250058.318.358.31600051.518.351.5SPL76.530.576.5N32.11.332.1median 54.9median 18.5median 54.9Delta12.31.912.341.644.737.338.431.630.630.536.226.22925.829.726.627.525.129.523.130.721.24023.448.623.253.420.456.119.157.417.859.217.864.416.965.617.764.117.961.217.763.917.366.117.567.417.566.717.566.617.664.117.36217.258.117.155.517.148.817.148.729.976.41.337.8median 17.7median 59.21.77.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseGigabyte Sabre 17-W8Asus TUF FX705GM
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (69.15 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(-) | highs are not linear (15.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (33.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 97% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 94% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Asus TUF FX705GM audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.4 / 0.68 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 9.3 / 14.8 / 22 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 63 / 187 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, TN, 1920x1080, 17.3		Asus TUF FX705GM
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3		Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3		Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3		MSI GP72VR 7RFX
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e, TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3		Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
 		Average of class Multimedia
 
Power Consumption
-26%
-54%
-1%
-31%
-17%
9%
Idle Minimum *
9.3
13
-40%
18.88
-103%
10.6
-14%
17.3
-86%
12.7 (4.9 - 38.3, n=70)
-37%
11.4 (2.1 - 101, n=958)
-23%
Idle Average *
14.8
17
-15%
24.36
-65%
16
-8%
22.5
-52%
17.5 (8.1 - 40.5, n=70)
-18%
15.9 (3 - 122, n=958)
-7%
Idle Maximum *
22
24
-9%
32.27
-47%
16.4
25%
22.5
-2%
21.8 (11.7 - 44.1, n=70)
1%
19.4 (4.6 - 181, n=958)
12%
Load Average *
63
106
-68%
107.74
-71%
75.9
-20%
85.1
-35%
91.7 (14.1 - 163, n=70)
-46%
59.9 (18.5 - 164, n=937)
5%
Load Maximum *
187
179
4%
160.28
14%
163.8
12%
151.3
19%
156 (21.9 - 220, n=69)
17%
78.1 (20.1 - 329, n=942)
58%
Witcher 3 ultra *
151
142
111.2
141.7

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
Au repos (module WiFi éteint, luminosité au minimum)
6h 51min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
5h 21min
En lecture de Big Buck Bunny encodé en H.264 1080p
5h 20min
Fortement sollicité (luminosité au maximum)
1h 24min
Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 62 Wh		Asus TUF FX705GM
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 64 Wh		Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 74 Wh		Razer Blade Pro RZ09-0220
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 70 Wh		MSI GP72VR 7RFX
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 41 Wh		Average of class Multimedia
 
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing 1.3
321
272
-15%
213
-34%
419
31%
128
-60%
371 (96 - 942, n=276)
16%
Autonomie de la batterie
-5%
-20%
31%
24%
6%
Reader / Idle
411
380
-8%
320
-22%
721
75%
39
-91%
418 (73 - 2085, n=905)
2%
H.264
320
260
-19%
369 (114 - 1053, n=112)
15%
Load
84
95
13%
70
-17%
72
-14%
201
139%
85.8 (32 - 238, n=909)
2%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
-10% / -7%
-27% / -24%
31% / 31%
-18% / -4%
11% / 9%

Points positifs

+ 2 miniDP + HDMI
+ écran lumineux avec de bons temps de réaction
+ bon processeur
+ silencieux et frais en cas de sollicitations
+ gestion de l'énergie et autonomie

Points négatifs

- plutôt encombrant
- performances WLAN
- écran TN, distribution de la luminosité, couleurs
- performances de jeu inférieures à la moyenne
- très mauvais haut-parleurs
En test : le Gigabyte Sabre 17. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par Gigabyte.
En test : le Gigabyte Sabre 17. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par Gigabyte.

Au final, le Gigabyte Sabre 17 WV8 est un bon appareil de remplacement de PC de bureau, qui peut gérer presque n’importe quelle tâche. Il fait bien les choses, mais déçoit dans un domaine crucial, celui du jeu.

L’écran est clairement conçu pour le jeu, et propose de bons temps de réaction, mais il manque quand même de couleurs vives. Dans presque tous les domaines, les performances de l’appareil sont satisfaisantes - mis à part pour le jeu, dans lequel ses concurrents font mieux. Le Sabre l’emporte sur ses concurrents dans les autres domaines, par exemple dans les tests Cinebench. Sa gestion énergétique est également bonne. Même en cas de sollicitations, le Gigabyte est toujours frais et silencieux. Il gagne des points supplémentaires au niveau de la consommation et de l’autonomie. Sa connectivité abondante pour des écrans externes est également appréciable.

Le Sabre mérite cependant des critiques quand on en arrive au jeu, et au niveau sonore de ses haut-parleurs. Le Sabre 17 paraît perd alors bêtement des points… L’appareil peut être acheté pour environ 1 500 €.

Ceux qui seraient intéressés par un portable économe en énergie remplaçant un PC de bureau pourront être séduits par le Sabre 17. Mais ils ne doivent pas faire une priorité du jeu, sans quoi ils devraient chercher une alternative.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8 - 11/01/2018 v6(old)
Christian Hintze

Châssis
78 / 98 → 79%
Clavier
86%
Dispositif de pointage
78%
Connectivité
70 / 81 → 86%
Poids
57 / 20-67 → 79%
Autonomie
83%
Écran
81%
Performances en jeu
86 / 85 → 100%
Performances dans les applications
94 / 92 → 100%
Chauffe
93%
Nuisance sonore
78 / 95 → 82%
Audio
30%
Appareil photo
45 / 85 → 53%
Moyenne
74%
84%
Multimedia - Moyenne compensée

Linked Articles

Gigabyte Sabre 17-W8 (Sabre Gamme)
Critique
•
Courte critique du PC portable...

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Courte critique du PC portable de jeu Gigabyte Sabre 17 (i7-8750H, GTX 1060, FHD)
Christian Hintze, 2018-11- 4 (Update: 2018-11- 4)