Notebookcheck

Courte critique du smartphone Samsung Galaxy J6+ (2018)

Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduit par Prévots), 03/02/2019

Coloré. Le J6 Plus de Samsung est un smartphone d’entrée de gamme pour ceux qui ne sont pas trop exigeants. La qualité ne souffre pas de ce faible prix, et l’appareil est assez performant pour les applications classiques du quotidien. Voyons ce que l’on peut attendre d’un smartphone à un peu moins de 200 € en ce début 2019.

Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 (Galaxy J Gamme)
Processeur
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
Carte graphique
Qualcomm Adreno 308
Mémoire
3072 Mo 
Écran
6 pouces 18.5:9, 1480 x 720 pixel 274 PPP, capacitif, TFT, brillant: oui
Disque dur
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 Go 
, 23 Go libres
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, Connectique audio: jack 3,5 mm, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: micro SD (jusqu'à 512 Go, FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: accéléromètre, gyroscope, capteur de proximité, boussole
Réseau
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850 / 900 / 1 800 / 1 900), UMTS WCDMA (B1 / B2 / B5 / B8), LTE 4G FDD/TDD (B1 / B3 / B5 / B7 / B8 / B20 / B38 / B40 / B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 7.9 x 161.4 x 76.9
Batterie
3300 mAh Lithium-Ion
Système d'exploitation
Android 8.1 Oreo
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 13 MPix Dual : 13 MP (f/1,9, 28 mm) + 5 MP (f/2,2)
Appareil photo secondaire: 8 MPix f/1,9
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: mono, Clavier: virtuel, Rétroéclairage du clavier: oui, adaptateur secteur USB, câble micro USB, écouteurs stéréos, outil pour carte SIM, Samsung Experience 9.5, 24 Mois Garantie, DAS (tête) : 0,308 W/kg, DAS (corps) : 1,334 W/kg, fanless
Poids
178 g, Alimentation: 44 g
Prix
250 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus

Comparaison des tailles

161.4 mm 76.9 mm 7.9 mm 178 g159.8 mm 76.8 mm 7.5 mm 168 g157 mm 75 mm 9.6 mm 204 g152.5 mm 74.8 mm 8 mm 181 g149.5 mm 72.2 mm 7.97 mm 160 g148.2 mm 74.2 mm 8 mm 165 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sharp D10
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
336 (min: 287, max: 344) MBit/s ∼100% +539%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
309 MBit/s ∼92% +487%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash
279 (min: 265, max: 284) MBit/s ∼83% +430%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
251 MBit/s ∼75% +377%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=351)
219 MBit/s ∼65% +316%
Motorola One
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
103 (min: 36, max: 118) MBit/s ∼31% +96%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Adreno 308, 425, 32 GB eMMC Flash
52.6 (min: 42, max: 58) MBit/s ∼16%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
347 MBit/s ∼100% +705%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash
320 (min: 164, max: 362) MBit/s ∼92% +642%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
280 MBit/s ∼81% +550%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=351)
210 MBit/s ∼61% +387%
Sharp D10
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
163 (min: 79, max: 172) MBit/s ∼47% +278%
Motorola One
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
112 (min: 57, max: 117) MBit/s ∼32% +160%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Adreno 308, 425, 32 GB eMMC Flash
43.1 (min: 18, max: 66) MBit/s ∼12%
010203040506070Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø52.1 (42-58)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø43.1 (18-66)
GNSS -  Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus
GNSS - Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus
GNSS -  Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus
GNSS - Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus
GNSS -  Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus
GNSS - Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Cliquer pour charger les images
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus - Mire de test.
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus - Mire de test (détails).
506
cd/m²
507
cd/m²
505
cd/m²
519
cd/m²
512
cd/m²
503
cd/m²
524
cd/m²
497
cd/m²
498
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 524 cd/m² Moyenne: 507.9 cd/m² Minimum: 4.08 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 95 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 512 cd/m²
Contraste: 1829:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.6 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.4
95.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.14
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
TFT, 1480x720, 6
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 6
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Sharp D10
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.9
Motorola One
IPS, 1520x720, 5.9
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
Screen
41%
28%
1%
-2%
24%
Brightness middle
512
570
11%
454
-11%
745
46%
467
-9%
597
17%
Brightness
508
565
11%
463
-9%
723
42%
452
-11%
592
17%
Brightness Distribution
95
93
-2%
86
-9%
89
-6%
87
-8%
92
-3%
Black Level *
0.28
0.6
-114%
0.38
-36%
0.32
-14%
Contrast
1829
1242
-32%
1229
-33%
1866
2%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.6
1.5
73%
2
64%
4.52
19%
5.29
6%
2.4
57%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
11.8
3.6
69%
5.3
55%
9.14
23%
7.71
35%
5.3
55%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
8
1.2
85%
1.7
79%
5.8
27%
5
37%
3.4
57%
Gamma
2.14 103%
2.07 106%
2.1 105%
2.262 97%
2.376 93%
2.2 100%
CCT
7831 83%
6504 100%
6394 102%
7660 85%
7583 86%
7172 91%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 52 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9813 (minimum : 43 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
24.4 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 8.8 ms hausse
↘ 15.6 ms chute
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 38 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont similaires à la moyenne (25.5 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
51.2 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 24.4 ms hausse
↘ 26.8 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 86 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (40.7 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
1411 Points ∼31%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4026 Points ∼87% +185%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP1, 3072
2371 Points ∼51% +68%
Sharp D10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
3728 Points ∼81% +164%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
3592 Points ∼78% +155%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
3621 Points ∼79% +157%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
  (1113 - 1460, n=15)
1352 Points ∼29% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 21070, n=240)
4605 Points ∼100% +226%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
1801 Points ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4429 Points ∼100% +146%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP1, 3072
3777 Points ∼85% +110%
Sharp D10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
4203 Points ∼95% +133%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
4374 Points ∼99% +143%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
4152 Points ∼94% +131%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
  (883 - 1939, n=17)
1752 Points ∼40% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1634 - 11598, n=292)
4432 Points ∼100% +146%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
644 Points ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1525 Points ∼100% +137%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP1, 3072
736 Points ∼48% +14%
Sharp D10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
875 Points ∼57% +36%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
878 Points ∼58% +36%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
858 Points ∼56% +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
  (541 - 692, n=17)
654 Points ∼43% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (590 - 4824, n=293)
1301 Points ∼85% +102%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
3243 Points ∼60%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5387 Points ∼100% +66%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP1, 3072
3722 Points ∼69% +15%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
4936 Points ∼92% +52%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
4953 Points ∼92% +53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
  (2829 - 3629, n=17)
3268 Points ∼61% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2828 - 9868, n=303)
4762 Points ∼88% +47%
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
4088 Points ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5625 Points ∼95% +38%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP1, 3072
4920 Points ∼83% +20%
Sharp D10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
5796 Points ∼98% +42%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
5927 Points ∼100% +45%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
5659 Points ∼95% +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
  (4009 - 4813, n=17)
4080 Points ∼69% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3977 - 13531, n=471)
5191 Points ∼88% +27%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
896 Points ∼45%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1871 Points ∼93% +109%
Sharp D10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
1711 Points ∼85% +91%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
2003 Points ∼100% +124%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
1744 Points ∼87% +95%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
  (375 - 911, n=16)
839 Points ∼42% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4493, n=334)
1739 Points ∼87% +94%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
250 Points ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
954 Points ∼46% +282%
Sharp D10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
1325 Points ∼64% +430%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
762 Points ∼37% +205%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
1303 Points ∼63% +421%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
  (118 - 250, n=16)
240 Points ∼12% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=334)
2077 Points ∼100% +731%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
298 Points ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1071 Points ∼61% +259%
Sharp D10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
1395 Points ∼79% +368%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
884 Points ∼50% +197%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
1381 Points ∼78% +363%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
  (145 - 298, n=16)
284 Points ∼16% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 7856, n=335)
1761 Points ∼100% +491%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
899 Points ∼43%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1829 Points ∼87% +103%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP1, 3072
1535 Points ∼73% +71%
Sharp D10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
1743 Points ∼83% +94%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
2091 Points ∼100% +133%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
1757 Points ∼84% +95%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
  (622 - 907, n=17)
865 Points ∼41% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4215, n=428)
1599 Points ∼76% +78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
54 Points ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
845 Points ∼50% +1465%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP1, 3072
278 Points ∼17% +415%
Sharp D10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
1269 Points ∼76% +2250%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
751 Points ∼45% +1291%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
1248 Points ∼74% +2211%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
  (31 - 199, n=17)
56.3 Points ∼3% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 9963, n=428)
1678 Points ∼100% +3007%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
68 Points ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
960 Points ∼67% +1312%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP1, 3072
340 Points ∼24% +400%
Sharp D10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
1351 Points ∼94% +1887%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
876 Points ∼61% +1188%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
1334 Points ∼93% +1862%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
  (39 - 239, n=17)
70.5 Points ∼5% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7166, n=436)
1437 Points ∼100% +2013%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
10416 Points ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
13914 Points ∼88% +34%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP1, 3072
12955 Points ∼82% +24%
Sharp D10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
13090 Points ∼83% +26%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
15762 Points ∼100% +51%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
13217 Points ∼84% +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
  (3958 - 10784, n=17)
9816 Points ∼62% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3958 - 37475, n=587)
13239 Points ∼84% +27%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
5447 Points ∼29%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
15567 Points ∼82% +186%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP1, 3072
7456 Points ∼39% +37%
Sharp D10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
18635 Points ∼99% +242%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
13382 Points ∼71% +146%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
18472 Points ∼98% +239%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
  (2546 - 5712, n=17)
5304 Points ∼28% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1152 - 162695, n=587)
18882 Points ∼100% +247%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
6093 Points ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
15167 Points ∼89% +149%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP1, 3072
8318 Points ∼49% +37%
Sharp D10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
17032 Points ∼100% +180%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
13847 Points ∼81% +127%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
16972 Points ∼100% +179%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
  (2951 - 6379, n=17)
5871 Points ∼34% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2915 - 77599, n=588)
15829 Points ∼93% +160%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
7.6 fps ∼23%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP1, 3072
12 fps ∼37% +58%
Sharp D10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
30 fps ∼91% +295%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
23 fps ∼70% +203%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
30 fps ∼91% +295%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
  (3.4 - 7.8, n=17)
7.41 fps ∼23% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.1 - 251, n=611)
32.8 fps ∼100% +332%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
13 fps ∼37%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP1, 3072
12 fps ∼34% -8%
Sharp D10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
29 fps ∼83% +123%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
35 fps ∼100% +169%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
28 fps ∼80% +115%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
  (6.4 - 20, n=17)
13.4 fps ∼38% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.9 - 120, n=614)
25.9 fps ∼74% +99%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
2.8 fps ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP1, 3072
5.1 fps ∼29% +82%
Sharp D10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
13 fps ∼73% +364%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
9.9 fps ∼56% +254%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
14 fps ∼79% +400%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
  (1.3 - 2.8, n=16)
2.69 fps ∼15% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.2 - 132, n=532)
17.7 fps ∼100% +532%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
5.5 fps ∼29%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP1, 3072
5.1 fps ∼27% -7%
Sharp D10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
14 fps ∼74% +155%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
19 fps ∼100% +245%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
13 fps ∼68% +136%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
  (3.7 - 11, n=17)
5.94 fps ∼31% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.1 - 115, n=536)
16.7 fps ∼88% +204%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
41483 Points ∼34%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
122826 Points ∼100% +196%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP1, 3072
61811 Points ∼50% +49%
Sharp D10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
90099 Points ∼73% +117%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
65759 Points ∼53% +59%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
89006 Points ∼72% +115%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
  (41483 - 46710, n=11)
39072 Points ∼32% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (41483 - 374820, n=216)
123220 Points ∼100% +197%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
35465 Points ∼40%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
87728 Points ∼100% +147%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP1, 3072
47339 Points ∼54% +33%
Sharp D10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
72035 Points ∼82% +103%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
66291 Points ∼76% +87%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
70346 Points ∼80% +98%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
  (29054 - 39106, n=17)
36278 Points ∼41% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (23275 - 273655, n=431)
80811 Points ∼92% +128%
BaseMark OS II
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
685 Points ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1090 Points ∼100% +59%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP1, 3072
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Sharp D10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
921 Points ∼84% +34%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
860 Points ∼79% +26%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
936 Points ∼86% +37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
  (10 - 802, n=17)
611 Points ∼56% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=544)
715 Points ∼66% +4%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
446 Points ∼25%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1356 Points ∼75% +204%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP1, 3072
533 Points ∼29% +20%
Sharp D10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
1495 Points ∼82% +235%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
1019 Points ∼56% +128%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
1480 Points ∼81% +232%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
  (418 - 447, n=17)
437 Points ∼24% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=544)
1820 Points ∼100% +308%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
643 Points ∼26%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2445 Points ∼100% +280%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP1, 3072
1265 Points ∼52% +97%
Sharp D10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
1235 Points ∼51% +92%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
1235 Points ∼51% +92%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
1334 Points ∼55% +107%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
  (363 - 1372, n=17)
678 Points ∼28% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 6283, n=544)
1334 Points ∼55% +107%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
1239 Points ∼27%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4506 Points ∼100% +264%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP1, 3072
2368 Points ∼53% +91%
Sharp D10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
3298 Points ∼73% +166%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
3176 Points ∼70% +156%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
3284 Points ∼73% +165%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
  (1043 - 1477, n=17)
1274 Points ∼28% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=544)
2674 Points ∼59% +116%
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 3072
702 Points ∼35%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2009 Points ∼100% +186%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP1, 3072
353 Points ∼18% -50%
Sharp D10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
1539 Points ∼77% +119%
Motorola One
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Adreno 506, 4096
1362 Points ∼68% +94%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
1570 Points ∼78% +124%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
  (207 - 891, n=17)
642 Points ∼32% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=548)
1326 Points ∼66% +89%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
47.986 Points ∼100% +159%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=469)
37.9 Points ∼79% +105%
Sharp D10 (Chrome 70)
27.85 Points ∼58% +50%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)
27.615 Points ∼58% +49%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4)
25.972 Points ∼54% +40%
Motorola One (Chrome 69)
21.317 Points ∼44% +15%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 72)
18.527 Points ∼39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (15.5 - 18.7, n=16)
17.5 Points ∼36% -6%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
9165 Points ∼100% +172%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=605)
5874 Points ∼64% +74%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)
5017 Points ∼55% +49%
Sharp D10 (Chrome 70)
5004 Points ∼55% +48%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4)
4560 Points ∼50% +35%
Motorola One (Chrome 69)
3781 Points ∼41% +12%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 72)
3374 Points ∼37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (2411 - 3374, n=17)
2952 Points ∼32% -13%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 72)
13548.5 ms * ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (10742 - 16192, n=17)
13125 ms * ∼97% +3%
Motorola One (Chrome 69)
12194 ms * ∼90% +10%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=624)
11142 ms * ∼82% +18%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)
10086 ms * ∼74% +26%
Sharp D10 (Chrome 70)
9807.1 ms * ∼72% +28%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4)
6820.9 ms * ∼50% +50%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
4122.8 ms * ∼30% +70%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (24 - 161, n=85)
64.8 Points ∼100% +159%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
57 Points ∼88% +128%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)
37 Points ∼57% +48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (24 - 28, n=5)
26 Points ∼40% +4%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 72)
25 Points ∼39%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
168 Points ∼100% +121%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 362, n=309)
117 Points ∼70% +54%
Motorola One (Chrome 69)
113 Points ∼67% +49%
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus (Chrome 67)
106 Points ∼63% +39%
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 72)
76 Points ∼45%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4)
75 Points ∼45% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (62 - 79, n=8)
71.3 Points ∼42% -6%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Galaxy J7 2017Sharp D10Motorola OneSony Xperia XA2 PlusAverage 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
12%
-25%
22%
94%
12%
-8%
-10%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
61.45 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
64.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
5%
63.86 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
63.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
60.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
67.02 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
9%
47.9 (3.4 - 87.1, n=119)
-22%
47.1 (19.2 - 87.1, n=357)
-23%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
76.63 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
78.15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
76.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
83.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
9%
80.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
5%
86.01 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
12%
66.8 (8.2 - 96.5, n=119)
-13%
65.3 (29.8 - 96.5, n=357)
-15%
Random Write 4KB
12.71
15.45
22%
10.54
-17%
16.79
32%
69.1
444%
10.5
-17%
19 (0.75 - 77.3, n=161)
49%
18.1 (0.14 - 250, n=653)
42%
Random Read 4KB
64.64
83.98
30%
25.86
-60%
47.2
-27%
61.9
-4%
77.43
20%
37.2 (3.59 - 117, n=161)
-42%
41.4 (1.59 - 173, n=653)
-36%
Sequential Write 256KB
95.57
104.87
10%
52.98
-45%
211.5
121%
214.9
125%
146.16
53%
94.8 (14.8 - 189, n=161)
-1%
86.3 (2.99 - 388, n=653)
-10%
Sequential Read 256KB
292.87
295.76
1%
198.47
-32%
280.71
-4%
280.2
-4%
281.06
-4%
231 (25.8 - 452, n=161)
-21%
242 (12.1 - 912, n=653)
-17%

Arena of Valor

010203040Tooltip
; min: Ø29.7 (16-32)
; high HD: Ø26.7 (17-31)

Temple Run 2

0102030405060Tooltip
: Ø53.9 (20-60)
 27.8 °C27.4 °C31.9 °C 
 27.8 °C28.4 °C30.8 °C 
 28.7 °C29.7 °C30.6 °C 
Maximum: 31.9 °C
Moyenne: 29.2 °C
27.9 °C27.9 °C27.9 °C
27.6 °C32.1 °C30.4 °C
27.9 °C31.7 °C33.4 °C
Maximum: 33.4 °C
Moyenne: 29.6 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  30.5 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.9 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 35.6 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.6372528.2263124.625.2402119.1502831.16327.225.48025.422.110023.623.312519.2181602027.320016.434.92501742.631516.549.340015.654.450014.360.663012.864.28001467.5100014.668.7125014.269.816001472200014.169.4250014.470.3315014.275.4400014.674.8500014.171.1630014.667.3800014.770.51000015.166.91250014.959.2160001547.8SPL26.683N0.852.5median 14.6median 66.9Delta1.611.836.940.336.538.337.241.337.637.331.736.223.826.624.427.123.624.319.92823.330.918.438.918.242.915.847.714.655.315.557.21358.912.357.212.164.711.968.410.771.710.772.710.571.310.368.910.765.710.566.410.568.810.662.710.659.810.557.610.644.672.461.552.561.424.180.325.514.68.214.50.642.9median 11.9median 58.93.411.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018Sharp D10
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Sharp D10 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.01 / 0.16 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 0.64 / 1.81 / 1.91 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 4.88 / 6.38 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3600 mAh
Sharp D10
2900 mAh
Motorola One
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
3580 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
2%
47%
21%
1%
21%
-21%
-3%
Idle Minimum *
0.64
0.71
-11%
0.39
39%
0.7
-9%
1
-56%
0.35
45%
1.113 (0.54 - 4.02, n=17)
-74%
0.881 (0.2 - 3.4, n=684)
-38%
Idle Average *
1.81
1.36
25%
1.06
41%
1
45%
1.6
12%
1.81
-0%
2.19 (1.2 - 6, n=17)
-21%
1.73 (0.6 - 6.2, n=683)
4%
Idle Maximum *
1.91
1.47
23%
1.08
43%
1.4
27%
2
-5%
1.83
4%
2.55 (1.62 - 6.64, n=17)
-34%
2.01 (0.74 - 6.6, n=684)
-5%
Load Average *
4.88
5.13
-5%
1.82
63%
3.7
24%
3.3
32%
3.31
32%
4.32 (2.9 - 9.6, n=17)
11%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=678)
17%
Load Maximum *
6.38
7.89
-24%
3.21
50%
5.2
18%
5.1
20%
4.97
22%
5.5 (4.3 - 7.34, n=17)
14%
5.84 (1.2 - 14.2, n=678)
8%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
Au repos (module WiFi éteint, luminosité au minimum)
34h 40min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10h 51min
En lecture de Big Buck Bunny encodé en H.264 1080p
11h 46min
Fortement sollicité (luminosité au maximum)
4h 32min
Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017
3600 mAh
Sharp D10
2900 mAh
Motorola One
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia XA2 Plus
3580 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie
-5%
45%
-1%
0%
69%
Reader / Idle
2080
1467
-29%
1950
-6%
1652
-21%
4682
125%
H.264
706
836
18%
1096
55%
769
9%
893
26%
WiFi v1.3
651
605
-7%
904
39%
644
-1%
735
13%
837
29%
Load
272
273
0%
525
93%
268
-1%
529
94%

Points positifs

+ écran tactile
+ appareil photo
+ double SIM et micro SD simultanément
+ qualité de construction

Points négatifs

- performances
- Wifi
- LTE que sur SIM 1
En test : le Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par notebooksbilliger.de.
En test : le Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par notebooksbilliger.de.

Notre test montre que le Samsung Galaxy J6+ est un smartphone robuste et bien conçu, avec un écran tactile honnête, des matériaux premiums et un design moderne. Son faible prix, son autonomie de presque 11h et ses appareils photos corrects renforcent cette bonne première impression.

Cependant, tout ce qui brille n’est pas d’or, et le J6+ souffre de quelques défauts, plus visibles que chez certains concurrents. Les performances suffisent pour des tâches simples, mais même des sites un peu complexes peuvent le pousser dans ses retranchements. Les applis graphiquement exigeantes ne fonctionnent pas du tout, ou il faudra beaucoup de patience. La mémoire est limitée à seulement 32 Go, ce qui est particulièrement réduit vu que les applis ne peuvent pas du tout être installées sur la carte SD. Les concurrents au prix officiel du J6+ à 250 € ne devraient pas s’en soucier, mais avec son prix réel d’environ 180à €, il mérite non seulement que nous nous y attardions, mais aussi que nous le recommandions !

Le Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus propose une qualité de construction premium et une solide configuration interne. Son prix officiel est trop élevé, mais son prix réel en fait une bonne affaire.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Samsung Galaxy J6 Plus 2018 - 02/28/2019 v6
Mike Wobker

Châssis
81%
Clavier
66 / 75 → 88%
Dispositif de pointage
87%
Connectivité
37 / 60 → 61%
Poids
90%
Autonomie
93%
Écran
84%
Performances en jeu
7 / 63 → 10%
Performances dans les applications
38 / 70 → 55%
Chauffe
94%
Nuisance sonore
100%
Audio
76 / 91 → 83%
Appareil photo
66%
Moyenne
71%
80%
Smartphone - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Courte critique du smartphone Samsung Galaxy J6+ (2018)
Mike Wobker, 2019-03- 2 (Update: 2019-03- 2)