Notebookcheck

Test de l'Asus ROG Zephyrus S15 GX502L (i7-10875H, RTX 2070 Super, FHD, 300 Hz) : le PC de jeu passe à Comet Lake

Cela devient Super. Non seulement le Zephyrus S15 fin d'Asus intègre de meilleurs composants, mais il intègre également une dalle 300 Hz. Dans notre test, nous allons voir si cela est un succès, avec la Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super intégrée.
Mike Wobker, 👁 Florian Glaser (traduit par Prévots), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Processeur
Intel Core i7-10875H 8 x 2.3 - 5.1 GHz, Comet Lake-H
Carte graphique
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile - 8192 Mo, Processeur: 1140 MHz, Mémoire: 1750 MHz, NVIDIA 451.67, Intel UHD Graphics
Mémoire
32768 Mo 
, DDR4 3200 double canal
Écran
15.60 pouces 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPP, B156HAN12.0 (AUOBC8C), IPS, brillant: non, 300 Hz
Carte mère
Intel HM470
Disque dur
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00, 1024 Go 
, 870 Go libres
Carte son
Intel Comet Lake PCH-H - cAVS
Connexions
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Encoche de Sécurité Kensington, Connectique audio: entrée 3,5 mm, sortie 3,5 mm
Réseau
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.1
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 19 x 360 x 252
Batterie
76 Wh Lithium-Ion
Système d'exploitation
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: stéréo, Clavier: chiclet, Rétroéclairage du clavier: oui, adaptateur secteur 240 watts, adaptateur secteur 65 Watt USB C , 24 Mois Garantie
Poids
2.089 kg, Alimentation: 608 g
Prix
2,600 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Note
Date
Modèle
Poids
Épaisseur
Taille
Résolution
Best Price
83 %
10/20
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
2.1 kg19 mm15.60"1920x1080
81 %
06/19
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
2.1 kg19 mm15.60"1920x1080
85 %
08/20
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
2.4 kg23 mm15.60"1920x1080
87 %
09/20
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
2.1 kg17.8 mm15.60"1920x1080
87 %
09/20
Aorus 15G XB
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
2.3 kg25 mm15.60"1920x1080
Asus ROG Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Asus ROG Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Asus ROG Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Asus ROG Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Asus ROG Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Asus ROG Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Asus ROG Zephyrus S15 GX502L

Comparaison des tailles

358 mm 267 mm 23 mm 2.4 kg356 mm 250 mm 25 mm 2.3 kg360 mm 252 mm 19 mm 2.1 kg360 mm 252 mm 19 mm 2.1 kg355 mm 235 mm 17.8 mm 2.1 kg
Côté gauche : entrée secteur, Gigabit LAN, HDMI, 1 USB 3.1 Gen 2, 1 prise jack micro, prise jack.
Côté gauche : entrée secteur, Gigabit LAN, HDMI, 1 USB 3.1 Gen 2, 1 prise jack micro, prise jack.
Côté droit : 1 Thunderbolt 3 (DP inclus), 2 USB 3.1 Gen 1, verrou de sécurité Kensington.
Côté droit : 1 Thunderbolt 3 (DP inclus), 2 USB 3.1 Gen 1, verrou de sécurité Kensington.
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1670 MBit/s ∼100% +18%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1420 MBit/s ∼85%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1394 (843min - 1528max) MBit/s ∼83% -2%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (289 - 1722, n=151)
1225 MBit/s ∼73% -14%
Aorus 15G XB
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1120 MBit/s ∼67% -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 1670, n=365)
755 MBit/s ∼45% -47%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
680 MBit/s ∼41% -52%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Aorus 15G XB
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1370 MBit/s ∼100% +5%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1310 MBit/s ∼96%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1240 (619min - 1284max) MBit/s ∼91% -5%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1150 MBit/s ∼84% -12%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (49.8 - 1775, n=151)
1099 MBit/s ∼80% -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 1645, n=365)
696 MBit/s ∼51% -47%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
683 MBit/s ∼50% -48%
278
cd/m²
287
cd/m²
274
cd/m²
287
cd/m²
283
cd/m²
286
cd/m²
298
cd/m²
306
cd/m²
298
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
B156HAN12.0 (AUOBC8C)
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 306 cd/m² Moyenne: 288.6 cd/m² Minimum: 14 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 90 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 283 cd/m²
Contraste: 1179:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.26 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7, calibrated: 1.11
ΔE Greyscale 3.4 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
93% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 71% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.228
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
B156HAN12.0 (AUOBC8C), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 15.60
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
AU Optronics B156HAN12.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Aorus 15G XB
Sharp LQ156M1JW03, IGZO, 1920x1080, 15.60
Response Times
29%
-13%
47%
-16%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
14 (6.8, 7.2)
7.2 (3.8, 3.4)
49%
16.4 (6.8, 7.6)
-17%
3.2 (1.4, 1.8)
77%
16 (8.4, 7.6)
-14%
Response Time Black / White *
9.6 (5.2, 4.4)
8.8 (4.4, 4.4)
8%
10.4 (6, 4.4)
-8%
8 (4, 4)
17%
11.2 (6.8, 4.4)
-17%
PWM Frequency
23580 (19)
23580 (24)
Screen
-14%
13%
-13%
8%
Brightness middle
283
286
1%
291
3%
345.4
22%
264
-7%
Brightness
289
275
-5%
278
-4%
342
18%
248
-14%
Brightness Distribution
90
90
0%
91
1%
90
0%
89
-1%
Black Level *
0.24
0.37
-54%
0.25
-4%
0.34
-42%
0.3
-25%
Contrast
1179
773
-34%
1164
-1%
1016
-14%
880
-25%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.26
2.19
3%
1.19
47%
3.18
-41%
1.21
46%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.64
4.4
22%
3.04
46%
6.57
-16%
3.07
46%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.11
2.27
-105%
1.77
-59%
0.92
17%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.4
2.2
35%
1.9
44%
3.8
-12%
1.6
53%
Gamma
2.228 99%
2.41 91%
2.216 99%
2.15 102%
2.192 100%
CCT
7249 90%
6405 101%
7018 93%
7109 91%
6340 103%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
71
59
-17%
70
-1%
64.3
-9%
68
-4%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
93
91
-2%
92
-1%
99
6%
90
-3%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
8% / -8%
0% / 9%
17% / -4%
-4% / 4%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
9.6 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 5.2 ms hausse
↘ 4.4 ms chute
L'écran montre de faibles temps de réponse, un bon écran pour jouer.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (24.4 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
14 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 6.8 ms hausse
↘ 7.2 ms chute
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (38.7 ms) de tous les appareils testés.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9725 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

CPUz - CPU
CPUz - Caches
CPUz - Carte-mère
CPUz - Mémoire vive
HWiNFO
GPUz
0100200300400500600700800900100011001200130014001500160017001800Tooltip
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1627 (1603.72-1663.62)
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1040 (1017.76-1182)
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK, Intel Core i9-10980HK: Ø1610 (1581.15-1708.45)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1366 (1323.8-1373.01)
Aorus 15G XB Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1613 (1597.32-1826.4)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
206 Points ∼100% +7%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (190 - 220, n=31)
204 Points ∼99% +6%
Aorus 15G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
202 Points ∼98% +5%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H
202 Points ∼98% +5%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
192 Points ∼93%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
177 Points ∼86% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 220, n=637)
163 Points ∼79% -15%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Aorus 15G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
1826 Points ∼100% +10%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1708 (1581.15min - 1708.45max) Points ∼94% +3%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
1664 (1603.72min - 1663.62max) Points ∼91%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (1111 - 1833, n=32)
1577 Points ∼86% -5%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H
1373 (1323.8min - 1373.01max) Points ∼75% -17%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
1182 Points ∼65% -29%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2804, n=645)
938 Points ∼51% -44%
Blender 2.79 - BMW27 CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (179 - 901, n=104)
380 Seconds * ∼100% -46%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H
333 Seconds * ∼88% -28%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (259 - 386, n=24)
318 Seconds * ∼84% -22%
Aorus 15G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
284 Seconds * ∼75% -9%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
278 Seconds * ∼73% -7%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
261 Seconds * ∼69%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
47941 MIPS ∼100%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
46976 MIPS ∼98% -2%
Aorus 15G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
46426 MIPS ∼97% -3%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (33674 - 49474, n=25)
43328 MIPS ∼90% -10%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H
38667 MIPS ∼81% -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (3034 - 75612, n=105)
37369 MIPS ∼78% -22%
7z b 4 -mmt1
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
5463 MIPS ∼100% +7%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (5071 - 5780, n=25)
5376 MIPS ∼98% +5%
Aorus 15G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
5319 MIPS ∼97% +4%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H
5285 MIPS ∼97% +3%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
5114 MIPS ∼94%
Average of class Gaming
  (2480 - 5811, n=105)
4954 MIPS ∼91% -3%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (456 - 524, n=26)
489 Points ∼100% +5%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H
488 Points ∼100% +4%
Aorus 15G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
482 Points ∼99% +3%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
476 Points ∼97% +2%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
467 Points ∼96%
Average of class Gaming
  (312 - 524, n=148)
453 Points ∼93% -3%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
430 Points ∼88% -8%
CPU (Multi Core)
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
3907 Points ∼100%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
3843 Points ∼98% -2%
Aorus 15G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
3723 Points ∼95% -5%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (2800 - 4176, n=26)
3532 Points ∼90% -10%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H
3256 Points ∼83% -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (1397 - 6321, n=149)
3027 Points ∼77% -23%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
2507 Points ∼64% -36%
Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Aorus 15G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
8190 Points ∼100% +8%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
8104 Points ∼99% +7%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (6988 - 8620, n=23)
7801 Points ∼95% +3%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
7583 Points ∼93%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H
7345 Points ∼90% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (2783 - 11393, n=88)
6627 Points ∼81% -13%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1352 Points ∼100% +9%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (1233 - 1371, n=23)
1305 Points ∼97% +5%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H
1287 Points ∼95% +4%
Aorus 15G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
1281 Points ∼95% +3%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
1242 Points ∼92%
Average of class Gaming
  (703 - 1428, n=88)
1231 Points ∼91% -1%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
13.5 fps ∼100%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
13 fps ∼96% -4%
Aorus 15G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
12.8 fps ∼95% -5%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (10.1 - 14.1, n=21)
11.9 fps ∼88% -12%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H
11 fps ∼81% -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.7 - 19.8, n=104)
10.3 fps ∼76% -24%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Average of class Gaming
  (23.9 - 95.8, n=80)
56.1 s * ∼100% -19%
Aorus 15G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
55.78 s * ∼99% -18%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
53.4 s * ∼95% -13%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (30.2 - 84.3, n=24)
50.1 s * ∼89% -6%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
47.1 s * ∼84%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H
46.3 s * ∼83% +2%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Average of class Gaming
  (0.531 - 1.088, n=85)
0.613 sec * ∼100% -3%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.597 sec * ∼97%
Aorus 15G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.586 sec * ∼96% +2%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.583 sec * ∼95% +2%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (0.546 - 0.662, n=23)
0.58 sec * ∼95% +3%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
0.564 sec * ∼92% +6%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1664 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
130 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
192 Points
Aide
PCMark 10 - Score
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
6739 Points ∼100% +24%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
6053 Points ∼90% +11%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
  (5447 - 6364, n=4)
5873 Points ∼87% +8%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
5654 Points ∼84% +4%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
5447 Points ∼81%
Aorus 15G XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
5393 Points ∼80% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7511, n=317)
5344 Points ∼79% -2%
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
7107.2 μs * ∼100%
Aorus 15G XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
2364.3 μs * ∼33% +67%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
1768.4 μs * ∼25% +75%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
935.4 μs * ∼13% +87%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
Aorus 15G XB
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
Average WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-11%
15%
12%
7%
2%
Write 4K
127.4
97.04
-24%
158.2
24%
139.8
10%
121.6
-5%
137 (108 - 186, n=6)
8%
Read 4K
46.38
49.58
7%
50.66
9%
48.62
5%
44.37
-4%
44 (36.5 - 50.7, n=6)
-5%
Write Seq
2034
1838
-10%
1790
-12%
2260
11%
2617
29%
2097 (1790 - 2874, n=6)
3%
Read Seq
2172
2421
11%
2469
14%
2135
-2%
1297
-40%
1982 (1615 - 2469, n=6)
-9%
Write 4K Q32T1
413.7
326.9
-21%
503.2
22%
499.3
21%
499
21%
436 (318 - 570, n=6)
5%
Read 4K Q32T1
354
372.9
5%
578.7
63%
551.8
56%
557.2
57%
427 (299 - 579, n=6)
21%
Write Seq Q32T1
3063
1894
-38%
3102
1%
2960
-3%
2978
-3%
3005 (2602 - 3102, n=6)
-2%
Read Seq Q32T1
3396
2828
-17%
3413
1%
3269
-4%
3360
-1%
3245 (2872 - 3413, n=6)
-4%
AS SSD
-18%
33%
-9%
13%
5%
Score Total
4881
2896
-41%
5673
16%
5103
5%
4685
-4%
4558 (3274 - 5673, n=6)
-7%
Score Write
3011
1528
-49%
2586
-14%
2310
-23%
2344
-22%
2370 (1650 - 3011, n=6)
-21%
Score Read
1292
923
-29%
2055
59%
1840
42%
1513
17%
1470 (1107 - 2055, n=6)
14%
Access Time Write *
0.032
0.04
-25%
0.026
19%
0.112
-250%
0.034
-6%
0.0365 (0.026 - 0.068, n=6)
-14%
Access Time Read *
0.057
0.08
-40%
0.05
12%
0.057
-0%
0.063
-11%
0.0567 (0.05 - 0.068, n=6)
1%
4K-64 Write
2797.35
1253
-55%
2188.39
-22%
2004.71
-28%
1961.92
-30%
2064 (1345 - 2797, n=6)
-26%
4K-64 Read
978.12
623.93
-36%
1710.1
75%
1594.37
63%
1284.1
31%
1177 (789 - 1712, n=6)
20%
4K Write
120.47
103.6
-14%
140
16%
96.51
-20%
109.27
-9%
135 (101 - 165, n=6)
12%
4K Read
42.83
48.32
13%
47.33
11%
50.19
17%
49.67
16%
44.6 (41.2 - 48.6, n=6)
4%
Seq Write
927.83
1711.53
84%
2580.63
178%
2092.37
126%
2724.02
194%
1703 (928 - 2620, n=6)
84%
Seq Read
2713.77
2505.83
-8%
2978.71
10%
1956.71
-28%
1794.68
-34%
2486 (1886 - 2979, n=6)
-8%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
-15% / -15%
24% / 25%
2% / -0%
10% / 10%
4% / 4%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3396 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3063 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 354 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 413.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2172 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2034 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 46.38 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 127.4 MB/s

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120113011401150116011701180119012001210122012301240125012601270128012901300131013201330134013501360137013801390140014101420143014401450146014701480149015001510152015301540155015601570158015901600161016201630164016501660167016801690170017101720173017401750176017701780179018001810182018301840185018601870188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020203020402050206020702080209021002110212021302140215021602170218021902200221022202230224022502260227022802290230023102320233023402350236023702380239024002410242024302440245024602470248024902500251025202530254025502560257025802590260026102620263026402650266026702680269027002710272027302740275027602770278027902800281028202830284028502860287028802890290029102920293029402950296029702980299030003010302030303040305030603070308030903100311031203130314031503160317031803190320032103220323032403250326032703280329033003310332033303340335033603370338033903400341034203430Tooltip
: Ø3421 (3225.63-3428.42)
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
8328 Points ∼100% +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
  (7840 - 8657, n=12)
8238 Points ∼99% +1%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
8134 Points ∼98%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
7891 Points ∼95% -3%
Aorus 15G XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
7343 Points ∼88% -10%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
7277 Points ∼87% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (368 - 13013, n=273)
6073 Points ∼73% -25%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
22836 Points ∼100% +4%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
21896 Points ∼96%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
  (18662 - 23042, n=12)
21824 Points ∼96% 0%
Aorus 15G XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
21150 Points ∼93% -3%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
20831 Points ∼91% -5%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
19123 Points ∼84% -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=658)
12424 Points ∼54% -43%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
141778 Points ∼100% +12%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
133326 Points ∼94% +6%
Aorus 15G XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
126747 Points ∼89% 0%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
126287 Points ∼89%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
  (75986 - 141778, n=7)
121959 Points ∼86% -3%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
109473 Points ∼77% -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (5761 - 184578, n=625)
72357 Points ∼51% -43%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
30309 Points ∼100% +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
  (28207 - 31050, n=8)
29416 Points ∼97% +1%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
29174 Points ∼96%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
28678 Points ∼95% -2%
Aorus 15G XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
27715 Points ∼91% -5%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
24267 Points ∼80% -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=734)
14980 Points ∼49% -49%
3DMark 11 Performance
23795 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
48072 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
19416 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
8293 points
Aide
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
  (76.3 - 94.6, n=8)
87.3 fps ∼100% +14%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK
85.1 (71min) fps ∼97% +12%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H
76.3 (64min) fps ∼87%
Aorus 15G XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
75.5 (63min) fps ∼86% -1%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
74 (70min - 78max) fps ∼85% -3%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H
70.2 (58min) fps ∼80% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=426)
54.3 fps ∼62% -29%
Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
  (98 - 112, n=2)
105 fps ∼100% +7%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H
98 fps ∼93%
Average of class Gaming
  (10 - 113, n=62)
74.8 fps ∼71% -24%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK
91.1 (59min) fps ∼100% +14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
  (79.7 - 91.1, n=2)
85.4 fps ∼94% +7%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
83.7 fps ∼92% +5%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H
79.7 fps ∼87%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.8 - 108, n=61)
57.4 fps ∼63% -28%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 high (2/3)
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK
133 (116.7min) fps ∼100% +20%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
127 (110.6min) fps ∼95% +14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
  (111 - 135, n=4)
127 fps ∼95% +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (15.3 - 167, n=90)
113 fps ∼85% +2%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H
111 (95.8min) fps ∼83%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
90 fps ∼100% +15%
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK
87 fps ∼97% +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
  (78.5 - 87, n=4)
83.5 fps ∼93% +6%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H
78.5 fps ∼87%
Average of class Gaming
  (17.2 - 103, n=96)
71 fps ∼79% -10%
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00: Ø75.5 (19-81)
Bas Moyen Élevé Ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 76.3 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 156 136 111 104 fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 79.7 fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 107 89.4 78.5 fps
Far Cry 5 (2018) 98 fps
Doom Eternal (2020) 190.4 fps

Degré de la nuisance sonore

Au repos
28 / 31 / 36 dB(A)
Fortement sollicité
56 / 57 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencieux
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
bruyant
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (à 15 cm de distance)   environment noise: 25 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.140.638.337.939.62538.537.133.738.337.9314751.640.145.4454031.934.925.829.433.5503031.728.541.9316328.52623.127.630.18027.322.617.816.629.710035.819.51816.535.712530.520.518.516.331.116030.920.619.218.431.120031.722.923.122.632.825032.821.821.516.934.631535.622.619.813.537.940035.922.117.811.937.550037.923.818.311.439.263039.824.319.310.841.180040.323.219.410.441.2100043.125.62211.143.4125044.526.32111.24516004626.621.611.647.220004726.721.611.347.7250046.124.61912.147.5315044.722.517.312.545.1400044.321.115.912.644.7500044.420.115.113.344.7630041.817.614.213.441.6800039.314.313.313.339.11000038.613.614.212.837.11250034.413.113.912.533.81600028.712.513.811.827.5SPL55.935.731.124.956.6N10.32.21.40.610.8median 39.3median 22.1median 18.5median 12.5median 39.2Delta5.32.82.91.45.2hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
 49 °C51 °C50 °C 
 47 °C50 °C46 °C 
 34 °C36 °C37 °C 
Maximum: 51 °C
Moyenne: 44.4 °C
44 °C44 °C42 °C
44 °C44 °C43 °C
41 °C35 °C32 °C
Maximum: 44 °C
Moyenne: 41 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  53 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.4 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 39.8 °C / 104 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 42.6 °C / 109 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37 °C / 98.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-8.2 °C / -14.8 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.944.62538.341.23145.453.24029.435.85041.9356327.634.78016.63710016.544.812516.352.616018.456.820022.657.925016.962.531513.561.740011.961.250011.46863010.870.280010.470.8100011.171.3125011.269.7160011.670.9200011.372.4250012.167.8315012.568.1400012.673.8500013.372.2630013.468.1800013.367.71000012.874.51250012.574.21600011.870.3SPL24.982.9N0.658.3median 12.5median 68.1Delta1.44.843.644.939.640.430.933.83542.828.335.92635.828.642.128.757.423.854.622.957.423.958.52560.92064.219.16417.965.117.372.516.97517.177.818.576.717.874.917.474.117.467.717.676.817.583.317.484.217.279.817.271.617.266.51769.216.863.43090.21.481.4median 17.5median 69.21.86hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus Zephyrus S15 GX502LAsus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 1.2 / 1.4 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 7 / 13 / 25 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 148 / 232 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Aorus 15G XB
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-61%
0%
-31%
-29%
-43%
Idle Minimum *
7
24
-243%
6
14%
14.3
-104%
16
-129%
18.7 (1.9 - 113, n=801)
-167%
Idle Average *
13
27
-108%
14
-8%
22.3
-72%
20
-54%
24.1 (6 - 119, n=801)
-85%
Idle Maximum *
25
33
-32%
25
-0%
36.9
-48%
30
-20%
29.7 (8.3 - 122, n=801)
-19%
Load Average *
148
129
13%
108
27%
118.4
20%
102
31%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=793)
30%
Witcher 3 ultra *
175
176
-1%
195
-11%
153.7
12%
156
11%
Load Maximum *
232
216
7%
280
-21%
220.8
5%
256
-10%
177 (21.9 - 590, n=792)
24%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
Au repos (module WiFi éteint, luminosité au minimum)
8h 40min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
3h 01min
Fortement sollicité (luminosité au maximum)
1h 30min
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, 76 Wh
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 76 Wh
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, 99.99 Wh
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 80 Wh
Aorus 15G XB
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 94 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Autonomie de la batterie
-14%
35%
110%
68%
3%
Reader / Idle
520
353
-32%
454
-13%
579
11%
367 (39 - 1399, n=742)
-29%
WiFi v1.3
181
220
22%
364
101%
380
110%
418
131%
271 (62 - 683, n=467)
50%
Load
90
62
-31%
106
18%
147
63%
80.1 (18 - 243, n=710)
-11%

Points positifs

+ performances de jeu
+ haut-parleurs
+ finesse du châssis

Points négatifs

- niveau sonore des ventilateurs
- absence de lecteur de carte

Verdict - Autonomie en baisse avec un GPU Super

En test : l'Asus ROG Zephyrus S15 GX502L. Modèle de test fourni par Asus Allemagne.
En test : l'Asus ROG Zephyrus S15 GX502L. Modèle de test fourni par Asus Allemagne.

L'Asus ROG Zephyrus S15 G502L est, sans aucun doute, un puissant PC portable de jeu. La conception fine en fait un appareil mobile si vous êtes prêt à souvent chercher un adaptateur secteur pour le plus petit des deux adaptateurs. En mode jeu, le système de ventilation permet un bon taux d'image, et sans que les ventilateurs ne doivent trop s'exciter.

Avec l'Asus ROG Zephyrus S15, l'on peut jouer sans soucis aux jeux récents au niveau maximum de détails.

Mais cela amène la question de savoir pourquoi les clients potentiels choisiraient ce modèle. Le prédécesseur est disponible à un prix similaire, possède des performances de jeu comparables, et tient un peu plus longtemps sur batterie. Le gain de performances n'est pas très élevé malgré le processeur plus récent, et la RTX 2070 Super à la place de la RTX 2070. Mais ceux qui préfèrent le maximum de performances sur l'autonomie seront pleinement satisfaits du Zephyrus S15.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L - 09/27/2020 v7
Mike Wobker

Châssis
81 / 98 → 82%
Clavier
79%
Dispositif de pointage
75%
Connectivité
65 / 80 → 81%
Poids
62 / 10-66 → 94%
Autonomie
52 / 95 → 55%
Écran
86%
Performances en jeu
95%
Performances dans les applications
92%
Chauffe
82 / 95 → 86%
Nuisance sonore
57 / 90 → 63%
Audio
90%
Moyenne
70%
83%
Gaming - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Test de l'Asus ROG Zephyrus S15 GX502L (i7-10875H, RTX 2070 Super, FHD, 300 Hz) : le PC de jeu passe à Comet Lake
Mike Wobker, 2020-10-13 (Update: 2020-10-13)