Notebookcheck

Test de l'Oppo Find X2 Pro : le poids d'un prix astronomique

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Felicitas Krohn (traduit par Prévots), 04/29/2020

Un tueur de Galaxy S20 Ultra ? Si le Find X2 Pro possède un design moderne et des composants du dernier cri, Oppo demande un prix élevé pour son smartphone haut de gamme ; Découvrez dans ce rapport de test de l’Oppo Find X2 Pro si le smartphone Oppo tient la comparaison face aux Galaxy S20 Ultra.

Oppo Find X2 Pro (Find X2 Gamme)
Carte graphique
Mémoire
12288 Mo 
Écran
6.7 pouces 19.8:9, 3168 x 1440 pixel 519 PPP, capacitif, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 6, brillant: oui, HDR, 120 Hz
Disque dur
512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 512 Go 
, 459 Go libres
Connexions
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 0 USB 3.1 Gen2, Connectique audio: USB C, 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: gyroscope, capteur de mouvement, boussole, capteur de proximité, USB OTG, Miracast
Réseau
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.1, GSM : 850 / 900 / 1 800 / 1 900MHz, WCDMA: bandes 1 / 2 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 8 / 19, LTE FDD : bandes 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 7 / 8 / 12 / 13 / 17 / 18 / 19 / 20 / 25 / 26 / 28 / 29 / 32 / 66, LTE TDD : bandes 34 / 38 / 39 / 40 / 41 / 42, NR TDD : n40 / 41 / 77 / 78, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 9.5 x 165.2 x 74.4
Batterie
4260 mAh Lithium-Polymère
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Système d'exploitation
Android 10
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 48 MPix capteur grand-angle : Sony IMX689, 1 / 1,4 pouces. Taille du capteur, ouverture f/1,7, lentille 7P, PDAF omni-directionnel avec tous les pixels, 12-bit True-Capture, mode nuit Ultra 3.0, vidéo Live-HDR; 48 MP ultra-grand-angle, capteur zoom périscope 13
Appareil photo secondaire: 32 MPix ouverture f/2,4, lentille 5 P, amélioration IA, mode nuit intelligent, mode nuit avec algorithme
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: stéréo, Clavier: virtuel, câble USB C, écouteurs, chargeur, guide de démarrage rapide, outil pour carte SIM, verre de protection, étui de protection, ColorOS 7.1, 24 Mois Garantie, A-GPS, Beidou, Glonass, Galileo, DAS : 0,88 W/kg (tête), 1,15 W/kg (corps), fanless, waterproof
Poids
202 g, Alimentation: 145 g
Prix
1199 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Appareils du comparatif

Note
Date
Modèle
Poids
Drive
Taille
Résolution
Best Price
86 %
04/20
Oppo Find X2 Pro
SD 865, Adreno 650
202 g512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.7"3168x1440
89 %
03/20
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11
219 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.9"3200x1440
89 %
04/20
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16
198 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.53"2400x1176
87 %
11/19
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
SD 855+, Adreno 640
206 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.67"3120x1440
Smartphone Oppo Find X2 Pro
Smartphone Oppo Find X2 Pro
Smartphone Oppo Find X2 Pro
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1010 (min: 912, max: 1092) MBit/s ∼100% +34%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
533 (min: 468, max: 602) MBit/s ∼53% -29%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
825 (min: 763, max: 855) MBit/s ∼82% +9%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
754 (min: 346, max: 881) MBit/s ∼75%
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
409 (min: 352, max: 468) MBit/s ∼40% -46%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1368, n=534)
256 MBit/s ∼25% -66%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
966 (min: 923, max: 995) MBit/s ∼100% +90%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
637 (min: 584, max: 715) MBit/s ∼66% +25%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
818 (min: 425, max: 890) MBit/s ∼85% +61%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
509 (min: 264, max: 571) MBit/s ∼53%
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
275 (min: 139, max: 310) MBit/s ∼28% -46%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1544, n=534)
242 MBit/s ∼25% -52%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø753 (346-881)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø509 (264-571)
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Oppo Find X2 Pro
GPS Oppo Find X2 Pro
GPS Oppo Find X2 Pro
GPS Oppo Find X2 Pro
GPS Oppo Find X2 Pro
GPS Oppo Find X2 Pro

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Cliquer pour charger les images
ColorChecker
18.9 ∆E
25.7 ∆E
23.1 ∆E
22.4 ∆E
26.4 ∆E
29.9 ∆E
29.8 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
31.6 ∆E
35 ∆E
19.7 ∆E
27.1 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
29.9 ∆E
25.2 ∆E
28.1 ∆E
27.7 ∆E
28.6 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
27.8 ∆E
21.2 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Find X2 Pro: 24.6 ∆E min: 12.31 - max: 34.98 ∆E
ColorChecker
17.8 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
7 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
11 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
6 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Find X2 Pro: 7.81 ∆E min: 2.71 - max: 17.82 ∆E
778
cd/m²
771
cd/m²
773
cd/m²
776
cd/m²
778
cd/m²
778
cd/m²
771
cd/m²
773
cd/m²
777
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 778 cd/m² Moyenne: 775 cd/m² Minimum: 1.97 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 99 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 778 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.4 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9
ΔE Greyscale 5.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26
Oppo Find X2 Pro
AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.7
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3200x1440, 6.9
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
OLED, 2400x1176, 6.53
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.67
Screen
15%
14%
12%
Brightness middle
778
734
-6%
592
-24%
606
-22%
Brightness
775
748
-3%
605
-22%
611
-21%
Brightness Distribution
99
95
-4%
96
-3%
95
-4%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.4
3.2
27%
2.5
43%
3.46
21%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.7
6.8
22%
5.5
37%
5.64
35%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.6
2.7
52%
2.6
54%
2
64%
Gamma
2.26 97%
2.11 104%
2.16 102%
2.258 97%
CCT
7250 90%
6299 103%
6173 105%
6779 96%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) décelé 480.8 Hz ≤ 99 Niveau de luminosité

Le rétroéclairage de l'écran scintille à la fréquence de 480.8 Hz (certainement du fait de l'utilisation d'une MDI - Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) à un niveau de luminosité inférieur ou égal à 99 % . Aucun scintillement ne devrait être perceptible au-dessus de cette valeur.

La fréquence de rafraîchissement de 480.8 Hz est relativement élevée, la grande majorité des utilisateurs ne devrait pas percevLa fréquence de rafraîchissement de 480.8 Hz est relativement élevée, la grande majorité des utilisateurs ne devrait pas percevoir de scintillements et être sujette à une fatigue oculaire accrue.oir de scintillements et être sujette à une fatigue oculaire accrue. Néanmoins certaines personnes pourront toujours percevoir un scintillement.

En comparaison, 50 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 18192 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 2500000) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
2.4 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 1.2 ms hausse
↘ 1.2 ms chute
L'écran montre de très faibles temps de réponse, parfait pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (24.8 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
2.8 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 1.6 ms hausse
↘ 1.2 ms chute
L'écran montre de très faibles temps de réponse, parfait pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (39.3 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
Geekbench 5.1
Vulkan Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
2641 Points ∼65%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
3804 Points ∼94% +44%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4043 Points ∼100% +53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (2519 - 2659, n=4)
2592 Points ∼64% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (118 - 4043, n=47)
1710 Points ∼42% -35%
OpenCL Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
2960 Points ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4491 Points ∼100% +52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (2829 - 3027, n=4)
2937 Points ∼65% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (272 - 4739, n=45)
1775 Points ∼40% -40%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3360 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
2815 Points ∼84% -16%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3062 Points ∼91% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (3309 - 3360, n=4)
3331 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (782 - 3531, n=59)
2007 Points ∼60% -40%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
911 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
940 Points ∼100% +3%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
781 Points ∼83% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (906 - 911, n=4)
909 Points ∼97% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (145 - 1342, n=59)
576 Points ∼61% -37%
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9491 Points ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
8648 Points ∼71% -9%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
12228 Points ∼100% +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (9443 - 9491, n=2)
9467 Points ∼77% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=341)
4791 Points ∼39% -50%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13279 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
12557 Points ∼95% -5%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
12280 Points ∼92% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (13186 - 13279, n=2)
13233 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 13279, n=404)
4860 Points ∼37% -63%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4278 Points ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4791 Points ∼100% +12%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3898 Points ∼81% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (4261 - 4278, n=2)
4270 Points ∼89% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=404)
1478 Points ∼31% -65%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11387 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
10255 Points ∼90% -10%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10322 Points ∼91% -9%
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
10700 Points ∼94% -6%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10442 Points ∼92% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (10613 - 12330, n=5)
11287 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11690, n=461)
5658 Points ∼50% -50%
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13360 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
14307 Points ∼100% +7%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
13947 Points ∼97% +4%
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
12907 Points ∼90% -3%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
12645 Points ∼88% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (11850 - 13471, n=4)
12956 Points ∼91% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 15193, n=622)
6179 Points ∼43% -54%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3843 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
3201 Points ∼83% -17%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3870 Points ∼100% +1%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
3564 Points ∼92% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (3336 - 3888, n=4)
3724 Points ∼96% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4057, n=123)
2609 Points ∼67% -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8076 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
8659 Points ∼100% +7%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6369 Points ∼74% -21%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6527 Points ∼75% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8076 - 8279, n=4)
8176 Points ∼94% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 8783, n=123)
2830 Points ∼33% -65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6444 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
6280 Points ∼97% -3%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5570 Points ∼86% -14%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5509 Points ∼85% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (6182 - 6618, n=5)
6486 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6618, n=123)
2550 Points ∼39% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5187 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4447 Points ∼80% -14%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5576 Points ∼100% +7%
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
4683 Points ∼84% -10%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4683 Points ∼84% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (5187 - 5506, n=4)
5289 Points ∼95% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5728, n=467)
2109 Points ∼38% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9345 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
9157 Points ∼98% -2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6657 Points ∼71% -29%
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
8006 Points ∼85% -14%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8006 Points ∼85% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (9345 - 9389, n=4)
9367 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9389, n=467)
1976 Points ∼21% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7982 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
7412 Points ∼92% -7%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6382 Points ∼80% -20%
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
6916 Points ∼86% -13%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6916 Points ∼86% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (7957 - 8111, n=5)
8019 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8111, n=468)
1834 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5209 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4436 Points ∼85% -15%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5133 Points ∼99% -1%
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
4604 Points ∼88% -12%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4604 Points ∼88% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (3973 - 5480, n=4)
4736 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5718, n=497)
2019 Points ∼39% -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12573 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
9470 Points ∼75% -25%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7970 Points ∼63% -37%
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
11448 Points ∼91% -9%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
11448 Points ∼91% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (12573 - 12694, n=4)
12633 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=497)
2620 Points ∼21% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9616 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
7563 Points ∼79% -21%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7098 Points ∼74% -26%
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
8605 Points ∼89% -11%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8605 Points ∼89% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8499 - 9807, n=4)
9186 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=497)
2202 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4582 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4267 Points ∼87% -7%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4909 Points ∼100% +7%
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
4519 Points ∼92% -1%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4519 Points ∼92% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (4582 - 4987, n=4)
4819 Points ∼98% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 4987, n=547)
2002 Points ∼41% -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8045 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
8257 Points ∼100% +3%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6478 Points ∼78% -19%
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
7044 Points ∼85% -12%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
7044 Points ∼85% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8045 - 8371, n=4)
8205 Points ∼99% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=547)
1649 Points ∼20% -80%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7012 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
6836 Points ∼96% -3%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6048 Points ∼85% -14%
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
6266 Points ∼88% -11%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6266 Points ∼88% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (7012 - 7190, n=5)
7123 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7190, n=548)
1577 Points ∼22% -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5054 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
3889 Points ∼77% -23%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4900 Points ∼97% -3%
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
4503 Points ∼89% -11%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4503 Points ∼89% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (4196 - 5054, n=4)
4727 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5054, n=589)
1867 Points ∼37% -63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11458 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
11488 Points ∼97% 0%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7671 Points ∼65% -33%
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
10637 Points ∼90% -7%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10637 Points ∼90% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (11371 - 12394, n=4)
11864 Points ∼100% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12394, n=588)
2148 Points ∼18% -81%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8866 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
8010 Points ∼90% -10%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6815 Points ∼77% -23%
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
8165 Points ∼92% -8%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8165 Points ∼92% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8581 - 9123, n=4)
8845 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9123, n=591)
1855 Points ∼21% -79%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
28147 Points ∼65%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
42135 Points ∼97% +50%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
43459 Points ∼100% +54%
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
30561 Points ∼70% +9%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
30561 Points ∼70% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (28147 - 32384, n=3)
30924 Points ∼71% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 46731, n=734)
14873 Points ∼34% -47%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
145567 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
79572 Points ∼54% -45%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
75073 Points ∼51% -48%
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
118129 Points ∼80% -19%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
118129 Points ∼80% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (145567 - 150281, n=3)
148288 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=732)
24244 Points ∼16% -83%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
75632 Points ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
66452 Points ∼83% -12%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
64626 Points ∼80% -15%
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
72173 Points ∼90% -5%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
72173 Points ∼90% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (75632 - 82937, n=3)
80377 Points ∼100% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97290, n=732)
19334 Points ∼24% -74%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
202 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
200 fps ∼99% -1%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
152 fps ∼75% -25%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
185 fps ∼91% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (202 - 206, n=4)
203 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=750)
41.9 fps ∼21% -79%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
119 fps ∼100% +98%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼50% 0%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼50% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (60 - 90, n=4)
75 fps ∼63% +25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=759)
29.7 fps ∼25% -50%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
123 fps ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
100 fps ∼81% -19%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
106 fps ∼85% -14%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
111 fps ∼90% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (122 - 126, n=4)
124 fps ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=654)
24.5 fps ∼20% -80%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
58 fps ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
59 fps ∼80% +2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼82% +3%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
57 fps ∼78% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (58 - 88, n=4)
73.5 fps ∼100% +27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=663)
21 fps ∼29% -64%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
86 fps ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
72 fps ∼83% -16%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
56 fps ∼65% -35%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
79 fps ∼91% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (86 - 88, n=5)
86.8 fps ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=518)
19.8 fps ∼23% -77%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
45 fps ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
58 fps ∼79% +29%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
73 fps ∼100% +62%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
40 fps ∼55% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (45 - 77, n=5)
61.2 fps ∼84% +36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=520)
18.3 fps ∼25% -59%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
18 fps ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
33 fps ∼100% +83%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
26 fps ∼79% +44%
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
17 fps ∼52% -6%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
17 fps ∼52% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (18 - 31, n=5)
25.4 fps ∼77% +41%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=259)
10.7 fps ∼32% -41%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
20 fps ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
22 fps ∼100% +10%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
19 fps ∼86% -5%
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
19 fps ∼86% -5%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
19 fps ∼86% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (20 - 20, n=5)
20 fps ∼91% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 68, n=257)
7.59 fps ∼35% -62%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
28 fps ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
51 fps ∼100% +82%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
40 fps ∼78% +43%
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
25 fps ∼49% -11%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
26 fps ∼51% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (28 - 48, n=5)
39.6 fps ∼78% +41%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=263)
15.9 fps ∼31% -43%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
53 fps ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
56 fps ∼100% +6%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
49 fps ∼88% -8%
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 12288
47 fps ∼84% -11%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
47 fps ∼84% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (53 - 54, n=5)
53.4 fps ∼95% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 165, n=262)
17.9 fps ∼32% -66%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
51 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
50 fps ∼98% -2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
41 fps ∼80% -20%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
48 fps ∼94% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (50 - 51, n=5)
50.4 fps ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=443)
13.4 fps ∼26% -74%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
26 fps ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
44 fps ∼100% +69%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
34 fps ∼77% +31%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
24 fps ∼55% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (26 - 45, n=5)
37.2 fps ∼85% +43%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=447)
12 fps ∼27% -54%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
599843 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
498708 Points ∼83% -17%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
483224 Points ∼81% -19%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
486654 Points ∼81% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (557310 - 599843, n=5)
580821 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 599843, n=71)
299770 Points ∼50% -50%
Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
29.22 (min: 4.07, max: 95.16) fps ∼65%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
45.28 fps ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.24 - 773, n=73)
29.7 fps ∼66%
Vulkan Medium Native (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
31.12 (min: 11.09, max: 63.1) fps ∼100%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
28.5 fps ∼92%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.57 - 63, n=63)
16.1 fps ∼52%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
33.9 (min: 9.36, max: 74.72) fps ∼76%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
44.62 fps ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.88 - 71.6, n=61)
20.1 fps ∼45%
VRMark - Amber Room (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4988 Score ∼82%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4957 Score ∼82% -1%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4997 Score ∼82% 0%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4986 Score ∼82% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (4988 - 7156, n=2)
6072 Score ∼100% +22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 7156, n=78)
2555 Score ∼42% -49%
BaseMark OS II
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1351 Points ∼92%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
1270 Points ∼87% -6%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
1462 Points ∼100% +8%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
1236 Points ∼85% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (1276 - 1514, n=4)
1409 Points ∼96% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=685)
790 Points ∼54% -42%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11496 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
10781 Points ∼92% -6%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10112 Points ∼87% -12%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10618 Points ∼91% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (11496 - 11842, n=4)
11659 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=685)
2296 Points ∼20% -80%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6350 Points ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4497 Points ∼62% -29%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6130 Points ∼85% -3%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5091 Points ∼70% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (6350 - 7945, n=4)
7246 Points ∼100% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7945, n=685)
1698 Points ∼23% -73%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9555 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
9478 Points ∼96% -1%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
9309 Points ∼94% -3%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
9294 Points ∼94% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (9555 - 10058, n=4)
9856 Points ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=685)
3240 Points ∼33% -66%
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5540 Points ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 12288
4915 Points ∼84% -11%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5389 Points ∼92% -3%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4992 Points ∼85% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (5540 - 6072, n=4)
5839 Points ∼100% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=685)
1637 Points ∼28% -70%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
65.88 Points ∼100% +2%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
64.567 Points ∼98%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (50.9 - 65, n=4)
60.9 Points ∼92% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80)
51.826 Points ∼79% -20%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=148)
38.8 Points ∼59% -40%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
115.49 Points ∼100% +1%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
114.65 Points ∼99%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (109 - 115, n=4)
114 Points ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80)
89.62 Points ∼78% -22%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=580)
45 Points ∼39% -61%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
74.1 runs/min ∼100% +4%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
71 runs/min ∼96%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (56.2 - 71, n=4)
65.9 runs/min ∼89% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80)
63.7 runs/min ∼86% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=133)
42.6 runs/min ∼57% -40%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
119 Points ∼100% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (100 - 118, n=4)
106 Points ∼89% +6%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
100 Points ∼84%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80)
86 Points ∼72% -14%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=211)
68.8 Points ∼58% -31%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
23568 Points ∼100% +3%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
22976 Points ∼97%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (22016 - 23678, n=4)
22876 Points ∼97% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80)
19122 Points ∼81% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=742)
7391 Points ∼31% -68%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (550 - 59466, n=767)
10129 ms * ∼100% -396%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (Chrome 80)
2344.7 ms * ∼23% -15%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
2043.6 ms * ∼20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (1945 - 2104, n=4)
2028 ms * ∼20% +1%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
1962.5 ms * ∼19% +4%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Oppo Find X2 ProSamsung Galaxy S20 UltraHuawei Mate 30 ProOnePlus 7T Pro McLaren EditionAverage 512 GB UFS 3.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
2%
1%
-39%
-17%
-81%
Random Write 4KB
204.98
221.37
8%
259.21
26%
25.5
-88%
166 (34.4 - 259, n=4)
-19%
29.2 (0.14 - 272, n=826)
-86%
Random Read 4KB
202.63
202.43
0%
226.38
12%
168.5
-17%
182 (158 - 203, n=4)
-10%
54 (1.59 - 265, n=826)
-73%
Sequential Write 256KB
728.72
697.08
-4%
401.79
-45%
404.8
-44%
478 (386 - 729, n=4)
-34%
112 (2.99 - 750, n=826)
-85%
Sequential Read 256KB
1605.6
1632.02
2%
1780.5
11%
1489
-7%
1541 (1303 - 1767, n=4)
-4%
310 (12.1 - 1781, n=826)
-81%
PUBG Mobile
01020304050Tooltip
; Balanced: Ø39.9 (37-41)
; HD: Ø39.9 (37-41)
Real Racing 3
0102030405060Tooltip
: Ø59.9 (58-60)
Dead Trigger 2
0102030405060Tooltip
: Ø59.9 (59-60)
 35.4 °C35.4 °C33.9 °C 
 35.6 °C35.7 °C34.2 °C 
 35.6 °C36.1 °C33.6 °C 
Maximum: 36.1 °C
Moyenne: 35.1 °C
30.9 °C32.6 °C33.7 °C
32 °C33.2 °C35 °C
31.3 °C33.7 °C35.4 °C
Maximum: 35.4 °C
Moyenne: 33.1 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  26.5 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.431.62529.623.93129.829.84025.525.45033.232.96326.825.98025.529.710023.727.412519.12916018.948.720017.247.325017.553.83151757.340015.162.15001562.563014.767.580015.571.3100015.572.7125014.773.1160014.574.8200014.674.6250014.576.9315013.776.7400014.776.8500014.574.6630014.570.7800014.565.21000014.864.91250014.955.91600015.550.1SPL26.985.9N0.962.7median 14.9median 65.2Delta1.311.133.431.529.629.329.828.525.526.133.232.126.824.925.523.323.724.319.13318.953.317.250.917.552.81757.515.159.7156414.764.315.565.715.567.314.771.514.575.114.675.714.574.313.775.714.772.314.572.314.569.814.570.614.869.514.962.715.55626.984.40.958.1median 14.9median 65.71.38.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOppo Find X2 ProSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Oppo Find X2 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.03 / 0.45 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 1.47 / 3.43 / 3.52 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 6.2 / 10.63 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Oppo Find X2 Pro
4260 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
5000 mAh
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
4500 mAh
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
4085 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
33%
43%
2%
24%
42%
Idle Minimum *
1.47
0.76
48%
0.87
41%
2.1
-43%
1.164 (0.53 - 2.2, n=8)
21%
0.882 (0.2 - 3.4, n=841)
40%
Idle Average *
3.43
1.91
44%
1.75
49%
3
13%
2.16 (1.19 - 3.43, n=8)
37%
1.747 (0.6 - 6.2, n=840)
49%
Idle Maximum *
3.52
1.96
44%
1.83
48%
3.5
1%
2.37 (1.23 - 3.7, n=8)
33%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=841)
42%
Load Average *
6.2
4.72
24%
3.85
38%
5.3
15%
5.01 (3.5 - 7.4, n=8)
19%
4.09 (0.8 - 10.8, n=835)
34%
Load Maximum *
10.63
10.15
5%
6.64
38%
8.3
22%
9.49 (7.68 - 12.3, n=8)
11%
6.02 (1.2 - 14.2, n=835)
43%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10h 54min
Oppo Find X2 Pro
4260 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
5000 mAh
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
4500 mAh
OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition
4085 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie
WiFi v1.3
654
720
10%
823
26%
912
39%

Points positifs

+ design
+ qualité de construction
+ nombre de bandes LTE
+ vitesse du stockage et du SoC
+ écran OLED lumineux 120 Hz

Points négatifs

- appareils photo
- stockage non extensible
- absence de charge sans-fil
- autonomie
- calibrage
- absence de 120 Hz en jeu

Verdict

En test : l'Oppo Find X2 Pro. Modèle de test fourni par Oppo Allemagne.
En test : l'Oppo Find X2 Pro. Modèle de test fourni par Oppo Allemagne.

Avec le Find X2 Pro, le fabricant chinois a réussi à créer un smartphone très élégant. Alors que les versions en cuir artificiel paraissent un peu bon marché, ils pourront en satisfaire certains – c’est une question de goût. Mais ce qui semble être plus un retour en arrière au regard du design est l’écran avec un trou plutôt que le look "propre" du prédécesseur, avec son appareil photo rétractable.

Le Find X2 Pro est un excellent smartphone, mais son prix laisse songeur, pour un fabricant qui n’est pas vraiment connu dans nombre de pays…

En ce qui concerne les composants, il y a peu de compromis, même si certains pourront se plaindre de l’absence de LED de statut, de charge sans-fil et de port jack. Les restrictions logicielles de ColorOS et une limitation à 60 Hz dans les jeux (et dans d’autres applis) sont également regrettables.

On peut ainsi dire que le prix du Find X2 Pro est trop élevé, d’autant que ses appareils photo ne sont pas non plus du meilleur niveau.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Oppo Find X2 Pro - 03/26/2020 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Châssis
91%
Clavier
67 / 75 → 89%
Dispositif de pointage
93%
Connectivité
53 / 70 → 75%
Poids
88%
Autonomie
89%
Écran
85%
Performances en jeu
61 / 64 → 95%
Performances dans les applications
81 / 86 → 95%
Chauffe
91%
Nuisance sonore
100%
Audio
72 / 90 → 80%
Appareil photo
72%
Moyenne
80%
86%
Smartphone - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Test de l'Oppo Find X2 Pro : le poids d'un prix astronomique
Marcus Herbrich, 2020-04-29 (Update: 2020-04-29)