Notebookcheck

Test de l'Oppo Find X2 Neo : le mélange des modèles chez Oppo

Le clone. Le Find X2 Neo est presque identique à un autre modèle d'Oppo. Les deux sont visuellement réussis et possèdent des composants du milieu de gamme, et un prix ambitieux. Découvrez dans ce rapport comment le smartphone Oppo se comporte.
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Felicitas Krohn (traduit par Prévots), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Oppo Find X2 Neo (Find X2 Gamme)
Processeur
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 475 Gold / Silver
Carte graphique
Mémoire
12288 Mo 
Écran
6.50 pouces 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 405 PPP, capacitif, OLED, brillant: oui, HDR, 90 Hz
Disque dur
256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 256 Go 
, 225 Go libres
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, 0 USB 3.1 Gen2, Connectique audio: USB C, 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: capteur géomagnétique, capteur de proximité, accéléromètre, gyroscope, USB OTG, Miracast
Réseau
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G : GSM 850 / 900 / 1 800 / 1 900 MHz ; 3G : WCDMA 1 / 2 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 8 / 19; 4G : TD-LTE 38 / 39 / 40 / 41 LTE-FDD 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 7 / 8 / 12 / 17 / 18 / 19 / 20 / 26 / 28 / 32 / 66 ; 5G NSA n40 / 78 (OTA : 5G NSA 1 / 3 / 5 / 7 / 28) , LTE, 5G, GPS
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 7.7 x 159.4 x 72.4
Batterie
4025 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Système d'exploitation
Android 10
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 48 MPix (Sony IMX586, 1/2 pouces, f/1,7, lentille 6P, OIS+EIS) + appareil photo 8 MP ultra-grand-angle (ouverture f/2,2, lentille 5P, 115°) + zoom 13 MP (ouverture f/2,4, 5P)+ 2 MP (f/2,4), API Appareil photo 2 : niveau 3
Appareil photo secondaire: 32 MPix ouverture f/2,4, 5P
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: stéréo, Clavier: virtuel, outil pour SIM, écouteurs, adaptateur secteur modulaire, coque en silicone, câble USB C, ColorOS 7, 24 Mois Garantie, DAS : 0,83 W/kg (tête), 1,30 kg/W (corps), Widevine L1, GNSS : GPS, Galileo, BeiDou, GLONASS, fanless
Poids
171 g, Alimentation: 90 g
Prix
699 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

, , , , , ,
relation de la recherche.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Appareils du comparatif

Note
Date
Modèle
Poids
Drive
Taille
Résolution
Best Price
83 %
08/20
Oppo Find X2 Neo
SD 765G, Adreno 620
171 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
84 %
07/20
Oppo Reno3 Pro
SD 765G, Adreno 620
171 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
88 %
07/20
Xiaomi Mi 10
SD 865, Adreno 650
208 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.67"2340x1080
86 %
07/20
realme X50 Pro
SD 865, Adreno 650
205 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.44"2400x1080
88 %
07/20
OnePlus 8
SD 865, Adreno 650
180 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.55"2400x1080
82 %
03/20
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
SD 765G, Adreno 620
208 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Oppo Find X2 Neo

Comparaison des tailles

165.3 mm 76.6 mm 8.79 mm 208 g162.6 mm 74.8 mm 8.96 mm 208 g160.2 mm 72.9 mm 8 mm 180 g158.96 mm 74.24 mm 8.9 mm 205 g159.4 mm 72.4 mm 7.7 mm 171 g159.4 mm 72.4 mm 7.7 mm 171 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
OnePlus 8
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
937 (466min - 960max) MBit/s ∼100% +49%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
867 (440min - 907max) MBit/s ∼93% +38%
realme X50 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
849 (414min - 930max) MBit/s ∼91% +35%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
634 (526min - 657max) MBit/s ∼68% +1%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
628 (294min - 639max) MBit/s ∼67%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=303, last 2 years)
415 MBit/s ∼44% -34%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
341 (280min - 399max) MBit/s ∼36% -46%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
realme X50 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
914 (888min - 928max) MBit/s ∼100% +35%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
903 (881min - 916max) MBit/s ∼99% +33%
OnePlus 8
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
894 (864min - 925max) MBit/s ∼98% +32%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
687 (345min - 697max) MBit/s ∼75% +1%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
678 (664min - 686max) MBit/s ∼74%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
639 (556min - 658max) MBit/s ∼70% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=303, last 2 years)
419 MBit/s ∼46% -38%
03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595630665679670678674665672681671686684683678667673684669686676684664664679683682673677678686686683679670678674665672681671686684683678667673684669686676684664664679683682673677678686686683294628639634625630627624635615637629628634636628635637631637625631629612627622617630633633Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø677 (664-686)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø618 (294-639)
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Oppo Find X2 Neo
GPS Oppo Find X2 Neo
GPS Oppo Find X2 Neo
GPS Oppo Find X2 Neo
GPS Oppo Find X2 Neo
GPS Oppo Find X2 Neo
Oppo Find X2 Neo - Ultra-grand-angle.
Oppo Find X2 Neo - Ultra-grand-angle.
Oppo Find X2 Neo - Grand-angle.
Oppo Find X2 Neo - Grand-angle.
Oppo Find X2 Neo - Zoom x2.
Oppo Find X2 Neo - Zoom x2.
Oppo Find X2 Neo - Zoom x5.
Oppo Find X2 Neo - Zoom x5.
Oppo Find X2 Neo - Zoom x20.
Oppo Find X2 Neo - Zoom x20.

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

WeitwinkelLowLightWeitwinkel5-fach-ZoomUltraweitwinkel
Cliquer pour charger les images
ColorChecker
15.9 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
6 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
1.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Find X2 Neo: 8.14 ∆E min: 1.4 - max: 19.33 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.3 ∆E
47.1 ∆E
36.8 ∆E
32.8 ∆E
41.4 ∆E
54.3 ∆E
46.1 ∆E
31.2 ∆E
32.7 ∆E
27 ∆E
55.9 ∆E
57 ∆E
28.8 ∆E
42.8 ∆E
27.4 ∆E
62.3 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
38.9 ∆E
59.8 ∆E
61.1 ∆E
47 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Find X2 Neo: 40.29 ∆E min: 13.42 - max: 62.32 ∆E
790
cd/m²
801
cd/m²
835
cd/m²
793
cd/m²
797
cd/m²
833
cd/m²
791
cd/m²
795
cd/m²
831
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 835 cd/m² Moyenne: 807.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.58 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 95 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 797 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.4 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 6.4 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.27
Oppo Find X2 Neo
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.50
Oppo Reno3 Pro
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50
Xiaomi Mi 10
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.67
realme X50 Pro
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.44
OnePlus 8
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
LCD IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Screen
-3%
38%
14%
38%
20%
Brightness middle
797
601
-25%
786
-1%
679
-15%
778
-2%
658
-17%
Brightness
807
574
-29%
791
-2%
690
-14%
783
-3%
643
-20%
Brightness Distribution
95
91
-4%
96
1%
97
2%
95
0%
93
-2%
Black Level *
0.49
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.4
4.84
10%
1.1
80%
3.2
41%
0.9
83%
1.8
67%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.2
8.26
10%
2.2
76%
6.2
33%
2.2
76%
4.4
52%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.4
5.2
19%
1.8
72%
4.1
36%
1.7
73%
3.8
41%
Gamma
2.27 97%
2.276 97%
2.26 97%
2.28 96%
2.25 98%
2.22 99%
CCT
7245 90%
7164 91%
6315 103%
6604 98%
6481 100%
6255 104%
Contrast
1343

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) décelé 370.4 Hz ≤ 99 Niveau de luminosité

Le rétroéclairage de l'écran scintille à la fréquence de 370.4 Hz (certainement du fait de l'utilisation d'une MDI - Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) à un niveau de luminosité inférieur ou égal à 99 % . Aucun scintillement ne devrait être perceptible au-dessus de cette valeur.

La fréquence de rafraîchissement de 370.4 Hz est relativement élevée, la grande majorité des utilisateurs ne devrait pas percevLa fréquence de rafraîchissement de 370.4 Hz est relativement élevée, la grande majorité des utilisateurs ne devrait pas percevoir de scintillements et être sujette à une fatigue oculaire accrue.oir de scintillements et être sujette à une fatigue oculaire accrue. Néanmoins certaines personnes pourront toujours percevoir un scintillement.

En comparaison, 52 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 14804 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 2500000) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
2.4 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 1.2 ms hausse
↘ 1.2 ms chute
L'écran montre de très faibles temps de réponse, parfait pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (24 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
2.8 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 1.2 ms hausse
↘ 1.6 ms chute
L'écran montre de très faibles temps de réponse, parfait pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (38.1 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
620 Points ∼67%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
606 Points ∼66% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
910 Points ∼99% +47%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
915 Points ∼100% +48%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
919 Points ∼100% +48%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
569 Points ∼62% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (554 - 673, n=17)
603 Points ∼66% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1604, n=235, last 2 years)
565 Points ∼61% -9%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1854 Points ∼54%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1799 Points ∼52% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3309 Points ∼97% +78%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3087 Points ∼90% +67%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3427 Points ∼100% +85%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1520 Points ∼44% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1520 - 1966, n=17)
1781 Points ∼52% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4455, n=235, last 2 years)
1939 Points ∼57% +5%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1266 Points ∼41%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1198 Points ∼39% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
2829 Points ∼92% +123%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3067 Points ∼100% +142%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3001 Points ∼98% +137%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1212 Points ∼40% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1178 - 1266, n=5)
1223 Points ∼40% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (285 - 4739, n=53, last 2 years)
1712 Points ∼56% +35%
Vulkan Score 5.1 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1192 Points ∼37%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1017 Points ∼31% -15%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
2549 Points ∼78% +114%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3259 Points ∼100% +173%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
2663 Points ∼82% +123%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1035 Points ∼32% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1004 - 1192, n=5)
1082 Points ∼33% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 4043, n=56, last 2 years)
1611 Points ∼49% +35%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
9955 Points ∼51%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
9647 Points ∼49% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11850 Points ∼60% +19%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
19711 Points ∼100% +98%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13079 Points ∼66% +31%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
10689 Points ∼54% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (8687 - 11041, n=16)
9734 Points ∼49% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2689 - 19989, n=223, last 2 years)
9982 Points ∼51% 0%
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
8456 Points ∼64%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
8573 Points ∼65% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
10613 Points ∼80% +26%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13202 Points ∼100% +56%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
10800 Points ∼82% +28%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
9989 Points ∼76% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (7245 - 9989, n=17)
8308 Points ∼63% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=267, last 2 years)
7878 Points ∼60% -7%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
44531 Points ∼53%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
43875 Points ∼52% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
Points ∼0% -100%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
83917 Points ∼100% +88%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
72524 Points ∼86% +63%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
47824 Points ∼57% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (38137 - 48201, n=17)
44398 Points ∼53% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2920 - 117606, n=207, last 2 years)
40247 Points ∼48% -10%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
69645 Points ∼48%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
66415 Points ∼46% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
Points ∼0% -100%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
145603 Points ∼100% +109%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
144611 Points ∼99% +108%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
68634 Points ∼47% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (56690 - 70216, n=17)
67538 Points ∼46% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2177 - 224130, n=207, last 2 years)
58049 Points ∼40% -17%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
19658 Points ∼58%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
20054 Points ∼59% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
Points ∼0% -100%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
33793 Points ∼100% +72%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
27026 Points ∼80% +37%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
23203 Points ∼69% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (14891 - 28331, n=17)
20632 Points ∼61% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8324 - 59268, n=207, last 2 years)
23323 Points ∼69% +19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4561 Points ∼51%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4494 Points ∼50% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8581 Points ∼96% +88%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8947 Points ∼100% +96%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8810 Points ∼98% +93%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4654 Points ∼52% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2972 - 4693, n=17)
4318 Points ∼48% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=261, last 2 years)
3370 Points ∼38% -26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5148 Points ∼42%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4976 Points ∼41% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12234 Points ∼100% +138%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11533 Points ∼94% +124%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11540 Points ∼94% +124%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5115 Points ∼42% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2844 - 5832, n=17)
4882 Points ∼40% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=261, last 2 years)
3942 Points ∼32% -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3259 Points ∼65%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3357 Points ∼67% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4196 Points ∼83% +29%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5034 Points ∼100% +54%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4819 Points ∼96% +48%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3432 Points ∼68% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1689 - 3529, n=17)
3237 Points ∼64% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 5301, n=261, last 2 years)
2757 Points ∼55% -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4621 Points ∼47%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4684 Points ∼47% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8499 Points ∼86% +84%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9910 Points ∼100% +114%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9850 Points ∼99% +113%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4643 Points ∼47% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3678 - 4893, n=17)
4562 Points ∼46% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=277, last 2 years)
3947 Points ∼40% -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5356 Points ∼42%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5223 Points ∼41% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12601 Points ∼98% +135%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12895 Points ∼100% +141%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12873 Points ∼100% +140%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5367 Points ∼42% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (4036 - 5437, n=17)
5181 Points ∼40% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 22052, n=277, last 2 years)
4982 Points ∼39% -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3099 Points ∼57%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3440 Points ∼63% +11%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3973 Points ∼73% +28%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5478 Points ∼100% +77%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5406 Points ∼99% +74%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3198 Points ∼58% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1790 - 3651, n=17)
3275 Points ∼60% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5784, n=275, last 2 years)
2908 Points ∼53% -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3301 Points ∼45%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3267 Points ∼45% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7190 Points ∼99% +118%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7293 Points ∼100% +121%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7174 Points ∼98% +117%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3277 Points ∼45% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2261 - 3346, n=17)
3162 Points ∼43% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=259, last 2 years)
2628 Points ∼36% -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3259 Points ∼39%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3251 Points ∼39% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8371 Points ∼100% +157%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8345 Points ∼100% +156%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8288 Points ∼99% +154%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3287 Points ∼39% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2048 - 3342, n=17)
3137 Points ∼37% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=259, last 2 years)
2784 Points ∼33% -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3395 Points ∼67%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3324 Points ∼66% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4813 Points ∼95% +42%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5068 Points ∼100% +49%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4879 Points ∼96% +44%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3256 Points ∼64% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2964 - 3556, n=17)
3331 Points ∼66% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=259, last 2 years)
2803 Points ∼55% -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3501 Points ∼43%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3497 Points ∼43% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7957 Points ∼97% +127%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8204 Points ∼100% +134%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8153 Points ∼99% +133%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3412 Points ∼42% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2934 - 3605, n=17)
3413 Points ∼42% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=275, last 2 years)
3191 Points ∼39% -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3569 Points ∼37%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3531 Points ∼37% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9389 Points ∼98% +163%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9567 Points ∼100% +168%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9542 Points ∼100% +167%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3554 Points ∼37% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2814 - 3592, n=17)
3467 Points ∼36% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 12914, n=275, last 2 years)
3565 Points ∼37% 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3301 Points ∼60%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3381 Points ∼61% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5187 Points ∼94% +57%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5523 Points ∼100% +67%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5401 Points ∼98% +64%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2965 Points ∼54% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1898 - 3765, n=17)
3288 Points ∼60% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5793, n=275, last 2 years)
2959 Points ∼54% -10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3065 Points ∼46%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3037 Points ∼46% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
6182 Points ∼93% +102%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6644 Points ∼100% +117%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6543 Points ∼98% +113%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2978 Points ∼45% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2287 - 3130, n=17)
2966 Points ∼45% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (426 - 6977, n=216, last 2 years)
2634 Points ∼40% -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3147 Points ∼38%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3135 Points ∼38% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8175 Points ∼99% +160%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8263 Points ∼100% +163%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8294 Points ∼100% +164%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3167 Points ∼38% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2145 - 3198, n=17)
3053 Points ∼37% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 11259, n=216, last 2 years)
2956 Points ∼36% -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
2756 Points ∼70%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
2737 Points ∼69% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3336 Points ∼85% +21%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3947 Points ∼100% +43%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3763 Points ∼95% +37%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2588 Points ∼66% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2145 - 2979, n=17)
2742 Points ∼69% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1786 - 4061, n=216, last 2 years)
2651 Points ∼67% -4%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
61 fps ∼68%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
90 fps ∼100% +48%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼67% -2%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼67% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
86 fps ∼96% +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (43 - 86, n=15)
62.5 fps ∼69% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=215, last 2 years)
57 fps ∼63% -7%
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
94 fps ∼45%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
202 fps ∼98% +115%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
204 fps ∼99% +117%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
207 fps ∼100% +120%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
95 fps ∼46% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (48 - 97, n=15)
88.7 fps ∼43% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 322, n=215, last 2 years)
106 fps ∼51% +13%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
50 fps ∼57%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
88 fps ∼100% +76%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼68% +20%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼68% +20%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
48 fps ∼55% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (30 - 55, n=15)
46.5 fps ∼53% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 120, n=213, last 2 years)
45 fps ∼51% -10%
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
56 fps ∼45%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
123 fps ∼98% +120%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
124 fps ∼99% +121%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
125 fps ∼100% +123%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
54 fps ∼43% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (31 - 56, n=15)
51.1 fps ∼41% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 180, n=214, last 2 years)
62 fps ∼50% +11%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
34 fps ∼45%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
75 fps ∼100% +121%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼80% +76%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼80% +76%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
33 fps ∼44% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (21 - 37, n=15)
31.5 fps ∼42% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=212, last 2 years)
35.4 fps ∼47% +4%
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
38 fps ∼43%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
86 fps ∼98% +126%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
86 fps ∼98% +126%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
88 fps ∼100% +132%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
37 fps ∼42% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (22 - 38, n=15)
35.3 fps ∼40% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 121, n=212, last 2 years)
42.5 fps ∼48% +12%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
19 fps ∼41%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
42 fps ∼91% +121%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
44 fps ∼96% +132%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
46 fps ∼100% +142%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
19 fps ∼41% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (11 - 21, n=15)
17.7 fps ∼38% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 61, n=211, last 2 years)
22.2 fps ∼48% +17%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼40%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
50 fps ∼96% +138%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
51 fps ∼98% +143%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
52 fps ∼100% +148%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
21 fps ∼40% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (12 - 21, n=15)
19.7 fps ∼38% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 75, n=211, last 2 years)
25.5 fps ∼49% +21%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼44%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼44% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
46 fps ∼96% +119%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
46 fps ∼96% +119%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
48 fps ∼100% +129%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
21 fps ∼44% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (13 - 23, n=17)
20.2 fps ∼42% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=280, last 2 years)
22.2 fps ∼46% +6%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
24 fps ∼44%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
23 fps ∼43% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
53 fps ∼98% +121%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
53 fps ∼98% +121%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
54 fps ∼100% +125%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
23 fps ∼43% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (12 - 24, n=17)
21.6 fps ∼40% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=279, last 2 years)
25.6 fps ∼47% +7%
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
13 fps ∼42%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
13 fps ∼42% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
29 fps ∼94% +123%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
30 fps ∼97% +131%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
31 fps ∼100% +138%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
8.9 fps ∼29% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (8.8 - 15, n=17)
12.3 fps ∼40% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=280, last 2 years)
14.8 fps ∼48% +14%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
8.5 fps ∼43%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
8.3 fps ∼42% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
20 fps ∼100% +135%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
20 fps ∼100% +135%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
20 fps ∼100% +135%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
13 fps ∼65% +53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (5.3 - 13, n=17)
8.38 fps ∼42% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=279, last 2 years)
10.1 fps ∼51% +19%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
326795 Points ∼55%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
566256 Points ∼95% +73%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
593933 Points ∼100% +82%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
563466 Points ∼95% +72%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
298925 Points ∼50% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (285731 - 332305, n=14)
312767 Points ∼53% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 727247, n=186, last 2 years)
331491 Points ∼56% +1%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3931 Points ∼63%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5752 Points ∼93% +46%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6205 Points ∼100% +58%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5897 Points ∼95% +50%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3990 Points ∼64% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3237 - 4094, n=14)
3813 Points ∼61% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (323 - 6959, n=198, last 2 years)
3625 Points ∼58% -8%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
6685 Points ∼66%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9810 Points ∼97% +47%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
10147 Points ∼100% +52%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
10021 Points ∼99% +50%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
6870 Points ∼68% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (5411 - 6936, n=14)
6506 Points ∼64% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 14189, n=198, last 2 years)
6635 Points ∼65% -1%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4856 Points ∼59%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7450 Points ∼91% +53%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8204 Points ∼100% +69%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6912 Points ∼84% +42%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5278 Points ∼64% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (4556 - 5683, n=14)
5099 Points ∼62% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (522 - 9044, n=198, last 2 years)
4241 Points ∼52% -13%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5216 Points ∼44%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11730 Points ∼100% +125%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11688 Points ∼100% +124%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11654 Points ∼99% +123%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5087 Points ∼43% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2525 - 5247, n=14)
4732 Points ∼40% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 16996, n=198, last 2 years)
5613 Points ∼48% +8%
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1412 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
1276 Points ∼81% -10%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1576 Points ∼100% +12%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1498 Points ∼95% +6%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1378 Points ∼87% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1139 - 1462, n=14)
1372 Points ∼87% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2169, n=198, last 2 years)
1272 Points ∼81% -10%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)
69.54 Points ∼100% +77%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
53.145 Points ∼76% +35%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
51.341 Points ∼74% +31%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
50.878 Points ∼73% +29%
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 161, n=184, last 2 years)
50 Points ∼72% +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (15.8 - 60.5, n=12)
47.7 Points ∼69% +21%
Oppo Find X2 Neo (Chrome 83)
39.325 Points ∼57%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
118 Points ∼100% +59%
realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)
102 Points ∼86% +38%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
99 Points ∼84% +34%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
80 Points ∼68% +8%
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 194, n=202, last 2 years)
78 Points ∼66% +5%
Oppo Find X2 Neo (Chrome 83)
74 Points ∼63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (20 - 101, n=13)
71.5 Points ∼61% -3%
Octane V2 - Total Score
realme X50 Pro
23768 Points ∼100% +44%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
22016 Points ∼93% +33%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
18809 Points ∼79% +14%
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 58632, n=209, last 2 years)
17325 Points ∼73% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (3592 - 19143, n=14)
16671 Points ∼70% +1%
Oppo Find X2 Neo (Chrome 83)
16523 Points ∼70%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
15745 Points ∼66% -5%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 29635, n=211, last 2 years)
3999 ms * ∼100% -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2359 - 15230, n=14)
3721 ms * ∼93% -38%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
2787 ms * ∼70% -4%
Oppo Find X2 Neo (Chrome 83)
2689.4 ms * ∼67%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
2538.1 ms * ∼63% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
2103.5 ms * ∼53% +22%
realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)
1999.7 ms * ∼50% +26%
realme X50 Pro
0 ms * ∼0% +100%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Oppo Find X2 NeoOppo Reno3 ProXiaomi Mi 10realme X50 ProOnePlus 8Xiaomi Redmi K30 5GAverage 256 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
1%
47%
68%
56%
-27%
-14%
-20%
Sequential Read 256KB
943.1
966.5
2%
1498.15
59%
1756.1
86%
1706.7
81%
889.67
-6%
827 (496 - 967, n=19)
-12%
751 (41.9 - 2037, n=286, last 2 years)
-20%
Sequential Write 256KB
454.36
471.6
4%
679.51
50%
756.21
66%
747.87
65%
312.76
-31%
314 (199 - 474, n=19)
-31%
328 (11.9 - 1321, n=286, last 2 years)
-28%
Random Read 4KB
160.47
153.1
-5%
207.04
29%
229.38
43%
215
34%
96.8
-40%
159 (108 - 208, n=19)
-1%
134 (13.5 - 325, n=286, last 2 years)
-16%
Random Write 4KB
143.8
146.7
2%
215.95
50%
251.98
75%
203.85
42%
100.99
-30%
125 (22.1 - 182, n=19)
-13%
120 (4.97 - 330, n=286, last 2 years)
-17%
 37.2 °C37.5 °C35.9 °C 
 37.2 °C36.8 °C36.2 °C 
 37.6 °C37.4 °C36.5 °C 
Maximum: 37.6 °C
Moyenne: 36.9 °C
34.7 °C35.9 °C35.8 °C
34.3 °C35.4 °C36.5 °C
34.2 °C36.6 °C37.1 °C
Maximum: 37.1 °C
Moyenne: 35.6 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  31.7 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.535.42529.430.63122.829.94025.326.55030.236.36323.326.98021.920.9100192412519.627.8160194120016.142.525018.950.831516.655.840014.359.65001564.763015.268.780014.372.2100014.373.2125014.273.5160014.875.3200014.875.3250014.476.1315014.377.3400014.677.8500014.774.1630014.971800014.967.51000014.6691250014.858.91600015.448.6SPL26.886.3N0.964.6median 14.8median 68.7Delta1.411.532.828.826.228.123.32521.925.52831.119.924.419.122.519.926.116.531.619.644.517.544.317.55113.956.713.961.415.865.215.265.61466.3146713.970.313.473.113.874.514.374.91473.414.572.714.670.914.569.414.768.415.165.41561.914.849.326.583.50.854.8median 14.6median 65.619.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOppo Find X2 NeoXiaomi Mi 10
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Oppo Find X2 Neo audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Mi 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.02 / 0.3 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 0.8 / 2.21 / 2.23 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 3.14 / 5.44 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Oppo Find X2 Neo
4025 mAh
Oppo Reno3 Pro
4025 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10
4780 mAh
realme X50 Pro
4200 mAh
OnePlus 8
4300 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
4500 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
3%
-18%
-15%
-31%
-8%
-14%
Idle Minimum *
0.8
0.53
34%
1
-25%
0.9
-13%
0.66
17%
0.965 (0.66 - 1.8, n=15)
-21%
0.934 (0.37 - 2.5, n=234, last 2 years)
-17%
Idle Average *
2.21
1.46
34%
1.77
20%
2.3
-4%
2.37
-7%
1.899 (0.82 - 2.55, n=15)
14%
1.843 (0.65 - 3.94, n=234, last 2 years)
17%
Idle Maximum *
2.23
1.52
32%
1.86
17%
2.33
-4%
2.42
-9%
2.07 (0.85 - 2.9, n=15)
7%
2.1 (0.69 - 4.2, n=234, last 2 years)
6%
Load Average *
3.14
3.83
-22%
4.23
-35%
3.5
-11%
6.8
-117%
3.98 (2.73 - 6.8, n=15)
-27%
4.46 (2.1 - 8.4, n=234, last 2 years)
-42%
Load Maximum *
5.44
8.89
-63%
9.13
-68%
7.68
-41%
7.5
-38%
6.19 (4.4 - 10.3, n=15)
-14%
7.24 (3.16 - 12.3, n=234, last 2 years)
-33%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
11h 52min
Oppo Find X2 Neo
4025 mAh
Oppo Reno3 Pro
4025 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10
4780 mAh
realme X50 Pro
4200 mAh
OnePlus 8
4300 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
4500 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie
WiFi v1.3
712
893
25%
662
-7%
775
9%
1045
47%
802
13%

Points positifs

+ luminosité de l'écran OLED 90 Hz
+ 12 Go de RAM / 256 Go de stockage UFS
+ haut-parleurs stéréos
+ qualité de construction...

Points négatifs

- ...avec un cadre acéré
- SIM seulement / pas de lecteur SD
- absence d'UFS 3.0
- performances (pour le prix)
- USB 2.0
- appareil photo grand angle
- absence de Wifi 6, de charge sans-fil, de protection IP
- absence d'eSIM
- absence de 4K en 60 FPS

Verdict

En test : l'Oppo Find X2 Neo. Modèle de test fourni par Oppo Allemagne.
En test : l'Oppo Find X2 Neo. Modèle de test fourni par Oppo Allemagne.

Parmi les points positifs concernant le Find X2 Neo, on retrouve sans aucun doute l'excellent et très lumineux écran AMOLED 90 Hz, qui s'utilise facilement en extérieur même dans la lumière directe du soleil. Son design et la qualité de construction sont très bons - mis à part les angles acérés - et le bon Snapdragon 765G lui permet d'atteindre des performances correctes.

Avec son prix, il est difficile de donner une recommandation d'achat au Find X2 Neo.

En effet, le fabricant chinois demande presque 700 € pour son smartphone du milieu de gamme. A ce prix, on trouve facilement des appareils avec des fonctionnalités premium, telles qu'une protection IP, le Wifi 6 ou la charge sans-fil, ainsi que des composants plus puissants, tels un Snapdragon 865, de la RAM LPDDR5, ou de la mémoire UFS 3.0 - tous absents du Find X2 Neo. De plus, la qualité photo n'est pas non plus à la hauteur, avec en particulier la lentille ultra-grand-angle, qui ne rend en rien justice à un smartphone de 2020 à 700 €.

Pour ceux qui n'auraient pas peur d'importer depuis la Chine, nous conseillons de jeter un œil à notre test de l'Oppo Reno3 Pro.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Oppo Find X2 Neo - 06/22/2020 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Châssis
86%
Clavier
67 / 75 → 89%
Dispositif de pointage
93%
Connectivité
50 / 70 → 71%
Poids
91%
Autonomie
89%
Écran
84%
Performances en jeu
36 / 64 → 56%
Performances dans les applications
76 / 86 → 89%
Chauffe
91%
Nuisance sonore
100%
Audio
80 / 90 → 89%
Appareil photo
67%
Moyenne
78%
83%
Smartphone - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Christian Hintze
Editor of the original article: Christian Hintze - Managing Editor - 1623 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2016
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Test de l'Oppo Find X2 Neo : le mélange des modèles chez Oppo
Marcus Herbrich, 2020-08-12 (Update: 2020-08-12)