Test du HP Omen 15 (i5-10300H, GTX 1660 Ti, FHD, 144 Hz) : portable de jeu avec une bonne autonomie
Note | Date | Modèle | Poids | Épaisseur | Taille | Résolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
82 % | 10/20 | HP Omen 15-ek0456ng i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | 2.1 kg | 32 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
81 % | 10/20 | Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 R7 4800HS, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | 2.1 kg | 19.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
81 % | 02/20 | Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | 2 kg | 26 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
81 % | Nexoc GH5 515IG i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 2.1 kg | 24.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | ||
80 % | 08/20 | MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5300M | 2 kg | 22 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
82 % | 07/19 | HP Omen 15-dc1020ng i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 2.3 kg | 25 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
Top 10
» Le Top 10 des PC portables multimédia
» Le Top 10 des PC portables de jeu
» Le Top 10 des PC portables de jeu légers
» Le Top 10 des ordinateurs portables bureautiques
» Le Top 10 des PC portables bureautiques premium/professionnels
» Le Top 10 des Stations de travail mobiles
» Le Top 10 des Ultraportables
» Le Top 10 des Ultrabooks
» Le Top 10 des Convertibles
» Le Top 10 des Tablettes
» Le Top 10 des Tablettes Windows
» Le Top 10 des Smartphones
» Le Top 10 des PC Portables á moins de 300 euros
» Le Top 10 des PC Portables á moins de 500 euros
» Le Top 25 des meilleurs écrans d'ordinateurs
Comparaison des tailles
SDCardreader Transfer Speed | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Average of class Gaming (11.7 - 218, n=307) | |
Nexoc GH5 515IG (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Average of class Gaming (13.4 - 257, n=305) | |
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Nexoc GH5 515IG (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
Networking | |
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V | |
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (289 - 1722, n=147) | |
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
Average of class Gaming (141 - 1670, n=365) | |
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (49.8 - 1775, n=147) | |
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Average of class Gaming (144 - 1645, n=365) | |
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng |

|
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 87 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 269 cd/m²
Contraste: 1427:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.51 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7, calibrated: 1.71
ΔE Greyscale 3.26 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
Gamma: 2.42
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng LGD05FE, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 Panda LM156LF-2F01, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V BOEhydis NV156FHM-N4G (BOE084D), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Nexoc GH5 515IG LG Philips LP156WFC-SPD1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 15.60 | HP Omen 15-dc1020ng LGD05CE, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Response Times | -89% | 27% | -117% | 6% | -152% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 17 (9, 8) | 24.4 (11.6, 12.8) -44% | 8.8 (4.4, 4.4) 48% | 34.8 (17.6, 17.2) -105% | 16 (7.6, 8.4) 6% | 40 (21.2, 18.8) -135% |
Response Time Black / White * | 11 (7, 4) | 25.6 (15.2, 10.4) -133% | 10.4 (5.2, 5.2) 5% | 25.2 (15.2, 10) -129% | 10.4 (6, 4.4) 5% | 29.6 (17.2, 12.4) -169% |
PWM Frequency | ||||||
Screen | -73% | -17% | -34% | -39% | -78% | |
Brightness middle | 314 | 255.9 -19% | 324 3% | 261 -17% | 311 -1% | 251 -20% |
Brightness | 293 | 246 -16% | 296 1% | 254 -13% | 313 7% | 232 -21% |
Brightness Distribution | 87 | 89 2% | 88 1% | 93 7% | 88 1% | 76 -13% |
Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.22 -0% | 0.27 -23% | 0.23 -5% | 0.43 -95% | 0.17 23% |
Contrast | 1427 | 1163 -19% | 1200 -16% | 1135 -20% | 723 -49% | 1476 3% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 2.51 | 5.15 -105% | 4.07 -62% | 4.71 -88% | 4.5 -79% | 6.2 -147% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 4.42 | 17.11 -287% | 6.39 -45% | 7.6 -72% | 7.97 -80% | 18.6 -321% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated * | 1.71 | 4.83 -182% | 1.49 13% | 3.67 -115% | 2.65 -55% | 4.8 -181% |
Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 3.26 | 4.2 -29% | 4.01 -23% | 2.76 15% | 3.3 -1% | 4.2 -29% |
Gamma | 2.42 91% | 2.16 102% | 2.6 85% | 2.42 91% | 2.129 103% | 2.32 95% |
CCT | 6150 106% | 7500 87% | 7350 88% | 7090 92% | 7227 90% | 7454 87% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 36.9 | 59 | 36 | 63 | 36.5 | |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 58 | 91 | 56 | 86 | 57.4 | |
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres) | -81% /
-76% | 5% /
-9% | -76% /
-49% | -17% /
-31% | -115% /
-92% |
* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances
Temps de réponse de l'écran
↔ Temps de réponse noir à blanc | ||
---|---|---|
11 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées | ↗ 7 ms hausse | |
↘ 4 ms chute | ||
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (24.4 ms) de tous les appareils testés. | ||
↔ Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80% | ||
17 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées | ↗ 9 ms hausse | |
↘ 8 ms chute | ||
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 14 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (38.7 ms) de tous les appareils testés. |
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé | |||
En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9725 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active. |
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
Average of class Gaming (312 - 524, n=148) | |
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V | |
Average Intel Core i5-10300H (312 - 470, n=13) | |
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Average of class Gaming (1397 - 6321, n=149) | |
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V | |
Average Intel Core i5-10300H (1397 - 2240, n=13) | |
Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V | |
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Average Intel Core i5-10300H (108 - 194, n=16) | |
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
Average of class Gaming (77 - 220, n=637) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V | |
Average of class Gaming (196 - 2804, n=645) | |
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
Average Intel Core i5-10300H (536 - 921, n=16) | |
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng |
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU | |
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
Average Intel Core i5-10300H (479 - 555, n=12) | |
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V | |
Average of class Gaming (179 - 901, n=104) | |
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average of class Gaming (2480 - 5811, n=105) | |
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V | |
Average Intel Core i5-10300H (2945 - 4956, n=12) | |
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
Average of class Gaming (3034 - 75612, n=105) | |
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V | |
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
Average Intel Core i5-10300H (15146 - 24772, n=12) | |
Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng |
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
Average of class Gaming (703 - 1428, n=88) | |
Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Average Intel Core i5-10300H (703 - 1241, n=14) | |
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V | |
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR |
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
Average of class Gaming (2783 - 11393, n=88) | |
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V | |
Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
Average Intel Core i5-10300H (2783 - 4728, n=14) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
Average of class Gaming (1.7 - 19.8, n=104) | |
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V | |
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
Average Intel Core i5-10300H (6.13 - 7.78, n=12) | |
Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
Average Intel Core i5-10300H (23.9 - 94, n=12) | |
Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Average of class Gaming (23.9 - 95.8, n=80) | |
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Average Intel Core i5-10300H (0.625 - 1.088, n=12) | |
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V | |
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
Average of class Gaming (0.531 - 1.088, n=85) | |
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 |
* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances
PCMark 8 | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
Average Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | |
Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
Average of class Gaming (2484 - 6825, n=466) | |
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
Average Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | |
Average of class Gaming (2554 - 6093, n=483) | |
Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4853 points | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 7696 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5507 points | |
PCMark 10 Score | 5127 points | |
Aide |
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng |
* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB | Nexoc GH5 515IG Samsung SSD 860 Evo 512GB | MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | HP Omen 15-dc1020ng WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G | Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 10% | -3% | -46% | 21% | 3% | -6% | |
Write 4K | 120 | 189.6 58% | 102 -15% | 89.58 -25% | 118.3 -1% | 112.1 -7% | 105 (35.1 - 133, n=8) -12% |
Read 4K | 36.09 | 61.7 71% | 41.39 15% | 40.88 13% | 43.73 21% | 42.01 16% | 43 (23.6 - 51.3, n=8) 19% |
Write Seq | 1778 | 1730 -3% | 1649 -7% | 517.9 -71% | 2854 61% | 1964 10% | 1595 (1345 - 1897, n=8) -10% |
Read Seq | 1362 | 1620 19% | 1367 0% | 538.7 -60% | 2302 69% | 2065 52% | 1766 (1327 - 2202, n=8) 30% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 429.1 | 474.2 11% | 379 -12% | 304 -29% | 418.5 -2% | 318.2 -26% | 345 (100 - 429, n=8) -20% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 493.2 | 527.6 7% | 401.2 -19% | 329 -33% | 517.1 5% | 406.7 -18% | 343 (62.7 - 493, n=8) -30% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 2935.8 | 1795 -39% | 3276 12% | 529.3 -82% | 3008 2% | 2534 -14% | 2601 (853 - 2966, n=8) -11% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 3226.6 | 1880 -42% | 3417 6% | 560.9 -83% | 3568 11% | 3438 7% | 2930 (1073 - 3278, n=8) -9% |
Write 4K Q8T8 | 1536.2 | 1248 (960 - 1536, n=2) -19% | |||||
Read 4K Q8T8 | 1489.6 | 1465 (1441 - 1490, n=2) -2% | |||||
AS SSD | -37% | 18% | -54% | 30% | -4% | -14% | |
Copy Game MB/s | 1666.93 | 1179.83 -29% | 319.64 -81% | 907.05 -46% | 1234 (755 - 1667, n=6) -26% | ||
Copy Program MB/s | 832.89 | 568.04 -32% | 283.84 -66% | 392.55 -53% | 524 (325 - 833, n=6) -37% | ||
Copy ISO MB/s | 1913.35 | 1375.73 -28% | 500.16 -74% | 1417.66 -26% | 2051 (1767 - 2625, n=6) 7% | ||
Score Total | 4364 | 2350 -46% | 5175 19% | 1198 -73% | 5518 26% | 4323 -1% | 3441 (1300 - 4424, n=8) -21% |
Score Write | 1825 | 1160 -36% | 2657 46% | 472 -74% | 2327 28% | 1901 4% | 1494 (345 - 1835, n=8) -18% |
Score Read | 1662 | 759 -54% | 1657 0% | 471 -72% | 2114 27% | 1619 -3% | 1306 (667 - 1719, n=8) -21% |
Access Time Write * | 0.039 | 0.128 -228% | 0.031 21% | 0.039 -0% | 0.025 36% | 0.032 18% | 0.0546 (0.027 - 0.143, n=8) -40% |
Access Time Read * | 0.079 | 0.062 22% | 0.07 11% | 0.073 8% | 0.063 20% | 0.084 -6% | 0.0795 (0.059 - 0.122, n=8) -1% |
4K-64 Write | 1471.46 | 837.71 -43% | 2298.97 56% | 335.72 -77% | 1919.91 30% | 1538.26 5% | 1215 (200 - 1502, n=8) -17% |
4K-64 Read | 1414.07 | 583.45 -59% | 1375.94 -3% | 380 -73% | 1779.73 26% | 1282.6 -9% | 1027 (416 - 1414, n=8) -27% |
4K Write | 97.18 | 158.96 64% | 118.42 22% | 87.28 -10% | 156.09 61% | 118.58 22% | 113 (28.9 - 153, n=8) 16% |
4K Read | 42.46 | 56.31 33% | 54.56 28% | 38.93 -8% | 61.42 45% | 40.56 -4% | 44.2 (22.3 - 52.7, n=8) 4% |
Seq Write | 2562 | 1637.14 -36% | 2393.08 -7% | 495 -81% | 2513.46 -2% | 2439.74 -5% | 1664 (908 - 2562, n=8) -35% |
Seq Read | 2053 | 1196.64 -42% | 2260.9 10% | 524.4 -74% | 2730.32 33% | 2955.46 44% | 2350 (1837 - 2772, n=8) 14% |
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres) | -14% /
-20% | 8% /
10% | -50% /
-51% | 26% /
26% | -1% /
-2% | -10% /
-11% |
* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances
Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (18610 - 22670, n=24) | |
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V | |
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Average of class Gaming (513 - 50983, n=734) | |
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
Nexoc GH5 515IG |
3DMark | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Average of class Gaming (368 - 13013, n=273) | |
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (5335 - 6123, n=22) | |
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V | |
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (14186 - 16488, n=24) | |
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
Average of class Gaming (385 - 40636, n=658) | |
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (59839 - 104780, n=18) | |
Average of class Gaming (5761 - 184578, n=625) | |
Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR |
3DMark 11 Performance | 16523 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 119496 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 31686 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 12767 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 6478 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 4946 points | |
Aide |
Bas | Moyen | Élevé | Ultra | ||
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 309.5 | 277.4 | 258.1 | 137 | fps |
GTA V (2015) | 164 | 133 | 71.8 | fps | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 256 | 179 | 104 | 54.2 | fps |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 143.5 | 126.8 | 119 | 113.6 | fps |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 232 | 166 | 97.8 | 87.4 | fps |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 133 | 81.4 | 59.9 | fps | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 85.7 | 77.8 | 67.1 | fps | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 124 | 97 | 90 | 85 | fps |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 292 | 144 | 114 | 97.4 | fps |
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 106 | 88 | 85 | 76 | fps |
Metro Exodus (2019) | 129 | 72.5 | 54.9 | 43.1 | fps |
Degré de la nuisance sonore
Au repos |
| 32.4 / 32.4 / 32.4 dB(A) |
Fortement sollicité |
| 32.5 / 51.9 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silencieux 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) bruyant |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 39.8 °C / 104 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.4 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 42.6 °C / 109 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.9 °C / 85.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.1 °C / -2 F).
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (58.08 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Éteint/en veille | ![]() ![]() |
Au repos | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Fortement sollicité |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Légende:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 R7 4800HS, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Nexoc GH5 515IG i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Samsung SSD 860 Evo 512GB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5300M, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 15.60 | HP Omen 15-dc1020ng i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 38% | 7% | 33% | 1% | 35% | -22% | -49% | |
Idle Minimum * | 9.2 | 5.1 45% | 9 2% | 3 67% | 11 -20% | 4.04 56% | 12.4 (3.9 - 20, n=19) -35% | 18.7 (1.9 - 113, n=801) -103% |
Idle Average * | 14.6 | 8.4 42% | 12 18% | 7 52% | 14 4% | 7.2 51% | 18 (8.9 - 30.7, n=19) -23% | 24.1 (6 - 119, n=801) -65% |
Idle Maximum * | 18.1 | 9.1 50% | 18 1% | 16 12% | 25 -38% | 11.4 37% | 25.3 (12.2 - 56.3, n=19) -40% | 29.7 (8.3 - 122, n=801) -64% |