Notebookcheck

Test du HP Omen 15 (i5-10300H, GTX 1660 Ti, FHD, 144 Hz) : portable de jeu avec une bonne autonomie

Jeu d'entrée de gamme abordable ! Avec la série Omen, HP propose des PC de jeu qui ciblent directement les joueurs. Elle permet à HP de couvrir le secteur haut de gamme, mais également de proposer des machines réussies en entrée de gamme. Avec l'actuel Omen 15, nous avons très certainement une machine intéressante, qui n'a pas à avoir honte de son rapport performances / prix.
Sebastian Bade, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, ✓ Felicitas Krohn (traduit par Prévots), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Geforce Laptop / Notebook Comet Lake
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng (Omen 15-ek Gamme)
Processeur
Intel Core i5-10300H 4 x 2.5 - 4.5 GHz, Comet Lake-H
Carte graphique
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile - 6144 Mo, Processeur: 1455 - 1590 MHz, Mémoire: 6000 MHz, GDDR6, Nvidia 451.67, Nvidia Optimus
Mémoire
16384 Mo 
, DDR4 2933
Écran
15.60 pouces 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPP, LGD05FE, IPS, brillant: non, 144 Hz
Carte mère
Intel HM470
Disque dur
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, 512 Go 
, 430 Go libres
Carte son
Realtek Audio
Connexions
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 0 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Connectique audio: prise jack, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: SD
Réseau
Realtek Gaming GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 32 x 358 x 240
Batterie
70.91 Wh, 5833 mAh Lithium-Ion, 6 cellules
Système d'exploitation
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Appareil photo
Webcam: 720p
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: B&O, deux haut-parleurs, HP Audio Boost 2.0, Clavier: chiclet 6 rangs, Rétroéclairage du clavier: oui, 24 Mois Garantie
Poids
2.137 kg, Alimentation: 652 g
Prix
1 239 EUR
Liens
HP Page d'accueil
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Note
Date
Modèle
Poids
Épaisseur
Taille
Résolution
Best Price
82 %
10/20
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		2.1 kg32 mm15.60"1920x1080
81 %
10/20
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
R7 4800HS, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q		2.1 kg19.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
81 %
02/20
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		2 kg26 mm15.60"1920x1080
81 %
Nexoc GH5 515IG
i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile		2.1 kg24.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
80 %
08/20
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5300M		2 kg22 mm15.60"1920x1080
82 %
07/19
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile		2.3 kg25 mm15.60"1920x1080
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng

Top 10
» Le Top 10 des PC portables multimédia 
» Le Top 10 des PC portables de jeu
» Le Top 10 des PC portables de jeu légers
» Le Top 10 des ordinateurs portables bureautiques
» Le Top 10 des PC portables bureautiques premium/professionnels 
» Le Top 10 des Stations de travail mobiles
» Le Top 10 des Ultraportables
» Le Top 10 des Ultrabooks
» Le Top 10 des Convertibles
» Le Top 10 des Tablettes
» Le Top 10 des Tablettes Windows
» Le Top 10 des Smartphones
» Le Top 10 des PC Portables á moins de 300 euros
» Le Top 10 des PC Portables á moins de 500 euros
» Le Top 25 des meilleurs écrans d'ordinateurs

Comparaison des tailles

❌
358 mm 240 mm 32 mm 2.1 kg360 mm 244 mm 26 mm 2 kg361 mm 258 mm 24.9 mm 2.1 kg360 mm 263 mm 25 mm 2.3 kg359 mm 254 mm 22 mm 2 kg360 mm 252 mm 19.9 mm 2.1 kg
Côté gauche : entrée secteur, Gigabit RJ45, USB 3.1 Gen. 1 (HP Sleep and Charge), HDMI 2.0b, prise jack, lecteur de carte SD.
Côté gauche : entrée secteur, Gigabit RJ45, USB 3.1 Gen. 1 (HP Sleep and Charge), HDMI 2.0b, prise jack, lecteur de carte SD.
Côté droit : USB C avec Thunderbolt 3 (40 Gb/s), Mini DisplayPort, ventilation, 2 USB 3.1 Gen. 1.
Côté droit : USB C avec Thunderbolt 3 (40 Gb/s), Mini DisplayPort, ventilation, 2 USB 3.1 Gen. 1.
A l'arrière : Ventilation.
A l'arrière : Ventilation.
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 218, n=307)
94 MB/s ∼100% +59%
Nexoc GH5 515IG
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
81 MB/s ∼86% +37%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
80.5 MB/s ∼86% +36%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
59 MB/s ∼63%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
23 MB/s ∼24% -61%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=305)
111 MB/s ∼100% +37%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s ∼78% +7%
Nexoc GH5 515IG
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
86 MB/s ∼77% +6%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
81.3 MB/s ∼73%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26 MB/s ∼23% -68%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Nexoc GH5 515IG
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1400 MBit/s ∼100% +55%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
1380 MBit/s ∼99% +52%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1340 MBit/s ∼96% +48%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (289 - 1722, n=147)
1221 MBit/s ∼87% +35%
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1210 (800min - 1337max) MBit/s ∼86% +34%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
905 (709min - 946max) MBit/s ∼65%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 1670, n=365)
755 MBit/s ∼54% -17%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
646 MBit/s ∼46% -29%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Nexoc GH5 515IG
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1400 MBit/s ∼100% +130%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1190 MBit/s ∼85% +95%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
1140 MBit/s ∼81% +87%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (49.8 - 1775, n=147)
1092 MBit/s ∼78% +79%
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
953 (432min - 1093max) MBit/s ∼68% +56%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 1645, n=365)
696 MBit/s ∼50% +14%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
680 MBit/s ∼49% +11%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
610 (562min - 651max) MBit/s ∼44%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø904 (709-946)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø610 (562-651)
ColorChecker
9.4 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
18.6 ∆E
20.9 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
23.6 ∆E
19.9 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
12 ∆E
25.7 ∆E
11 ∆E
22.5 ∆E
21.8 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
ColorChecker HP Omen 15-ek0456ng: 15.48 ∆E min: 1.18 - max: 25.68 ∆E
308
cd/m²		296
cd/m²		301
cd/m²
287
cd/m²		314
cd/m²		274
cd/m²
292
cd/m²		285
cd/m²		283
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
LGD05FE
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 314 cd/m² Moyenne: 293.3 cd/m² Minimum: 11.7 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 87 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 269 cd/m²
Contraste: 1427:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.51 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7, calibrated: 1.71
ΔE Greyscale 3.26 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
Gamma: 2.42
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
LGD05FE, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60		Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
Panda LM156LF-2F01, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60		Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
BOEhydis NV156FHM-N4G (BOE084D), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60		Nexoc GH5 515IG
LG Philips LP156WFC-SPD1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60		MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 15.60		HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
LGD05CE, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Response Times
-89%
27%
-117%
6%
-152%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
17 (9, 8)
24.4 (11.6, 12.8)
-44%
8.8 (4.4, 4.4)
48%
34.8 (17.6, 17.2)
-105%
16 (7.6, 8.4)
6%
40 (21.2, 18.8)
-135%
Response Time Black / White *
11 (7, 4)
25.6 (15.2, 10.4)
-133%
10.4 (5.2, 5.2)
5%
25.2 (15.2, 10)
-129%
10.4 (6, 4.4)
5%
29.6 (17.2, 12.4)
-169%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-73%
-17%
-34%
-39%
-78%
Brightness middle
314
255.9
-19%
324
3%
261
-17%
311
-1%
251
-20%
Brightness
293
246
-16%
296
1%
254
-13%
313
7%
232
-21%
Brightness Distribution
87
89
2%
88
1%
93
7%
88
1%
76
-13%
Black Level *
0.22
0.22
-0%
0.27
-23%
0.23
-5%
0.43
-95%
0.17
23%
Contrast
1427
1163
-19%
1200
-16%
1135
-20%
723
-49%
1476
3%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.51
5.15
-105%
4.07
-62%
4.71
-88%
4.5
-79%
6.2
-147%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.42
17.11
-287%
6.39
-45%
7.6
-72%
7.97
-80%
18.6
-321%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.71
4.83
-182%
1.49
13%
3.67
-115%
2.65
-55%
4.8
-181%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.26
4.2
-29%
4.01
-23%
2.76
15%
3.3
-1%
4.2
-29%
Gamma
2.42 91%
2.16 102%
2.6 85%
2.42 91%
2.129 103%
2.32 95%
CCT
6150 106%
7500 87%
7350 88%
7090 92%
7227 90%
7454 87%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
36.9
59
36
63
36.5
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
58
91
56
86
57.4
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
-81% / -76%
5% / -9%
-76% / -49%
-17% / -31%
-115% / -92%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

HP Omen 15 - CalMAN : Échelle de gris.
HP Omen 15 - CalMAN : Échelle de gris.
HP Omen 15 - CalMAN : saturation.
HP Omen 15 - CalMAN : saturation.
HP Omen 15 - CalMAN : ColorChecker.
HP Omen 15 - CalMAN : ColorChecker.
HP Omen 15 - CalMAN : Échelle de gris (après calibrage).
HP Omen 15 - CalMAN : Échelle de gris (après calibrage).
HP Omen 15 - CalMAN : saturation (après calibrage).
HP Omen 15 - CalMAN : saturation (après calibrage).
HP Omen 15 - CalMAN : ColorChecker (après calibrage).
HP Omen 15 - CalMAN : ColorChecker (après calibrage).

Temps de réponse de l'écran

ℹ
Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
   ↔    Temps de réponse noir à blanc
11 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 7 ms hausse
↘ 4 ms chute
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (24.4 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
   ↔    Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
17 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 9 ms hausse
↘ 8 ms chute
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 14 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (38.7 ms) de tous les appareils testés.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

ℹ
Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9725 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
Intel Extreme Tuning Utility
Intel Extreme Tuning Utility (benchmark)
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750Tooltip
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng Intel Core i5-10300H, Intel Core i5-10300H: Ø897 (886.62-902.36)
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS, AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS: Ø1634 (1595.85-1741.4)
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1012 (995.35-1103.17)
Nexoc GH5 515IG Intel Core i5-10300H, Intel Core i5-10300H: Ø836 (815.48-892.15)
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H: Ø1697 (1664.03-1741.33)
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng Intel Core i5-9300H, Intel Core i5-9300H: Ø748 (730.55-769.02)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
482 Points ∼100% +6%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
477 Points ∼99% +5%
Nexoc GH5 515IG
Intel Core i5-10300H
462 Points ∼96% +2%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
454 Points ∼94%
Average of class Gaming
  (312 - 524, n=148)
453 Points ∼94% 0%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
Intel Core i7-9750H
447 Points ∼93% -2%
Average Intel Core i5-10300H
  (312 - 470, n=13)
444 Points ∼92% -2%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
419 Points ∼87% -8%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
3956 Points ∼100% +77%
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
3869 Points ∼98% +73%
Average of class Gaming
  (1397 - 6321, n=149)
3027 Points ∼77% +35%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
2240 Points ∼57%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
Intel Core i7-9750H
2140 Points ∼54% -4%
Average Intel Core i5-10300H
  (1397 - 2240, n=13)
2056 Points ∼52% -8%
Nexoc GH5 515IG
Intel Core i5-10300H
2013 Points ∼51% -10%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
1723 Points ∼44% -23%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
Intel Core i7-9750H
191 Points ∼100% +1%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
190 Points ∼99%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
186 Points ∼97% -2%
Nexoc GH5 515IG
Intel Core i5-10300H
186 Points ∼97% -2%
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
186 Points ∼97% -2%
Average Intel Core i5-10300H
  (108 - 194, n=16)
173 Points ∼91% -9%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
171 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 220, n=637)
163 Points ∼85% -14%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1741 (1664.03min - 1741.33max) Points ∼100% +92%
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
1634.29 (1595.85min - 1741.4max) Points ∼94% +80%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
Intel Core i7-9750H
1103 (995.35min - 1103.17max) Points ∼63% +22%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2804, n=645)
938 Points ∼54% +3%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
907 Points ∼52%
Nexoc GH5 515IG
Intel Core i5-10300H
892 Points ∼51% -2%
Average Intel Core i5-10300H
  (536 - 921, n=16)
822 Points ∼47% -9%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
769 Points ∼44% -15%
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
643 Seconds * ∼100% -34%
Nexoc GH5 515IG
Intel Core i5-10300H
539 Seconds * ∼84% -12%
Average Intel Core i5-10300H
  (479 - 555, n=12)
515 Seconds * ∼80% -7%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
481.4 Seconds * ∼75%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
Intel Core i7-9750H
470 Seconds * ∼73% +2%
Average of class Gaming
  (179 - 901, n=104)
380 Seconds * ∼59% +21%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
284 Seconds * ∼44% +41%
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
284 Seconds * ∼44% +41%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming
  (2480 - 5811, n=105)
4954 MIPS ∼100% 0%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
4951 MIPS ∼100%
Nexoc GH5 515IG
Intel Core i5-10300H
4919 MIPS ∼99% -1%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
Intel Core i7-9750H
4839 MIPS ∼98% -2%
Average Intel Core i5-10300H
  (2945 - 4956, n=12)
4697 MIPS ∼95% -5%
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
4655 MIPS ∼94% -6%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
4626 MIPS ∼93% -7%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4584 MIPS ∼93% -7%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
48392 MIPS ∼100% +95%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
47520 MIPS ∼98% +92%
Average of class Gaming
  (3034 - 75612, n=105)
37369 MIPS ∼77% +51%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
Intel Core i7-9750H
31341 MIPS ∼65% +27%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
24768 MIPS ∼51%
Average Intel Core i5-10300H
  (15146 - 24772, n=12)
23125 MIPS ∼48% -7%
Nexoc GH5 515IG
Intel Core i5-10300H
22791 MIPS ∼47% -8%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
20736 MIPS ∼43% -16%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
1241 Points ∼100%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
1235 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (703 - 1428, n=88)
1231 Points ∼99% -1%
Nexoc GH5 515IG
Intel Core i5-10300H
1210 Points ∼98% -2%
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
1188 Points ∼96% -4%
Average Intel Core i5-10300H
  (703 - 1241, n=14)
1162 Points ∼94% -6%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
Intel Core i7-9750H
1161 Points ∼94% -6%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1154 Points ∼93% -7%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
7682 Points ∼100% +63%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
7453 Points ∼97% +58%
Average of class Gaming
  (2783 - 11393, n=88)
6627 Points ∼86% +40%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
Intel Core i7-9750H
4861 Points ∼63% +3%
Nexoc GH5 515IG
Intel Core i5-10300H
4722 Points ∼61% 0%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
4722 Points ∼61%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
4720 Points ∼61% 0%
Average Intel Core i5-10300H
  (2783 - 4728, n=14)
4320 Points ∼56% -9%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
12 fps ∼100% +54%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
11.7 fps ∼98% +50%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.7 - 19.8, n=104)
10.3 fps ∼86% +32%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
Intel Core i7-9750H
7.91 fps ∼66% +2%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
7.78 fps ∼65%
Average Intel Core i5-10300H
  (6.13 - 7.78, n=12)
7.03 fps ∼59% -10%
Nexoc GH5 515IG
Intel Core i5-10300H
7.01 fps ∼58% -10%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
5.7 fps ∼48% -27%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
93.9 s * ∼100% -294%
Average Intel Core i5-10300H
  (23.9 - 94, n=12)
58.9 s * ∼63% -147%
Nexoc GH5 515IG
Intel Core i5-10300H
56.9 s * ∼61% -139%
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
56.7 s * ∼60% -138%
Average of class Gaming
  (23.9 - 95.8, n=80)
56.1 s * ∼60% -135%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
23.85 s * ∼25%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average Intel Core i5-10300H
  (0.625 - 1.088, n=12)
0.685 sec * ∼100% -9%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
Intel Core i7-9750H
0.638 sec * ∼93% -1%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
0.63 sec * ∼92%
Nexoc GH5 515IG
Intel Core i5-10300H
0.625 sec * ∼91% +1%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.531 - 1.088, n=85)
0.613 sec * ∼89% +3%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
0.597 sec * ∼87% +5%
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
0.58 sec * ∼85% +8%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
7170
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
12570 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
36185 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
9351 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6229
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
27801
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit
9.36 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 32Bit
76.15 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.17 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
10.06 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
75.75 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit
1.94 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
190 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
114.02 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
907 Points
Aide
PCMark 10 | PCMark 8
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
Radeon RX 5300M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
7178 Points ∼100% +27%
Average of class Gaming
  (1764 - 11829, n=313)
6480 Points ∼90% +15%
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 4800HS, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
6195 Points ∼86% +10%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i5-10300H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
5640 Points ∼79%
Average Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
 
5640 Points ∼79% 0%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
5044 Points ∼70% -11%
Nexoc GH5 515IG
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H, Samsung SSD 860 Evo 512GB
4980 Points ∼69% -12%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
4426 Points ∼62% -22%
Productivity
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i5-10300H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
7681 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
 
7681 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (4175 - 9077, n=314)
7357 Points ∼96% -4%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
7345 Points ∼96% -4%
Nexoc GH5 515IG
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H, Samsung SSD 860 Evo 512GB
7327 Points ∼95% -5%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
7261 Points ∼95% -5%
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 4800HS, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
7082 Points ∼92% -8%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
Radeon RX 5300M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
6893 Points ∼90% -10%
Essentials
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
Radeon RX 5300M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
9833 Points ∼100% +16%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
9275 Points ∼94% +10%
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 4800HS, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
9162 Points ∼93% +9%
Nexoc GH5 515IG
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H, Samsung SSD 860 Evo 512GB
8947 Points ∼91% +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (4892 - 11266, n=315)
8791 Points ∼89% +4%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
8575 Points ∼87% +2%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i5-10300H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
8443 Points ∼86%
Average Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
 
8443 Points ∼86% 0%
Score
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
Radeon RX 5300M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
5639 Points ∼100% +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7511, n=317)
5344 Points ∼95% +4%
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 4800HS, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
5291 Points ∼94% +3%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i5-10300H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
5127 Points ∼91%
Average Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
 
5127 Points ∼91% 0%
Nexoc GH5 515IG
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H, Samsung SSD 860 Evo 512GB
4936 Points ∼88% -4%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
4873 Points ∼86% -5%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
4807 Points ∼85% -6%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 4800HS, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
5901 Points ∼100% +7%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i5-10300H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
5507 Points ∼93%
Average Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
 
5507 Points ∼93% 0%
Nexoc GH5 515IG
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H, Samsung SSD 860 Evo 512GB
5179 Points ∼88% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6825, n=466)
5126 Points ∼87% -7%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
5107 Points ∼87% -7%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 4800HS, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
4913 Points ∼100% +1%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i5-10300H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
4853 Points ∼99%
Average Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
 
4853 Points ∼99% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=483)
4290 Points ∼87% -12%
Nexoc GH5 515IG
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H, Samsung SSD 860 Evo 512GB
3971 Points ∼81% -18%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
3691 Points ∼75% -24%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4853 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
7696 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5507 points
PCMark 10 Score
5127 points
Aide
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i5-10300H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
3177.9 μs * ∼100%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

AS SSD
AS SSD
CDM 3
CDM 3
CDM 5
CDM 5
CDM 6
CDM 6
CDI
CDI
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G		Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8		Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB		Nexoc GH5 515IG
Samsung SSD 860 Evo 512GB		MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR		HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G		Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
10%
-3%
-46%
21%
3%
-6%
Write 4K
120
189.6
58%
102
-15%
89.58
-25%
118.3
-1%
112.1
-7%
105 (35.1 - 133, n=8)
-12%
Read 4K
36.09
61.7
71%
41.39
15%
40.88
13%
43.73
21%
42.01
16%
43 (23.6 - 51.3, n=8)
19%
Write Seq
1778
1730
-3%
1649
-7%
517.9
-71%
2854
61%
1964
10%
1595 (1345 - 1897, n=8)
-10%
Read Seq
1362
1620
19%
1367
0%
538.7
-60%
2302
69%
2065
52%
1766 (1327 - 2202, n=8)
30%
Write 4K Q32T1
429.1
474.2
11%
379
-12%
304
-29%
418.5
-2%
318.2
-26%
345 (100 - 429, n=8)
-20%
Read 4K Q32T1
493.2
527.6
7%
401.2
-19%
329
-33%
517.1
5%
406.7
-18%
343 (62.7 - 493, n=8)
-30%
Write Seq Q32T1
2935.8
1795
-39%
3276
12%
529.3
-82%
3008
2%
2534
-14%
2601 (853 - 2966, n=8)
-11%
Read Seq Q32T1
3226.6
1880
-42%
3417
6%
560.9
-83%
3568
11%
3438
7%
2930 (1073 - 3278, n=8)
-9%
Write 4K Q8T8
1536.2
1248 (960 - 1536, n=2)
-19%
Read 4K Q8T8
1489.6
1465 (1441 - 1490, n=2)
-2%
AS SSD
-37%
18%
-54%
30%
-4%
-14%
Copy Game MB/s
1666.93
1179.83
-29%
319.64
-81%
907.05
-46%
1234 (755 - 1667, n=6)
-26%
Copy Program MB/s
832.89
568.04
-32%
283.84
-66%
392.55
-53%
524 (325 - 833, n=6)
-37%
Copy ISO MB/s
1913.35
1375.73
-28%
500.16
-74%
1417.66
-26%
2051 (1767 - 2625, n=6)
7%
Score Total
4364
2350
-46%
5175
19%
1198
-73%
5518
26%
4323
-1%
3441 (1300 - 4424, n=8)
-21%
Score Write
1825
1160
-36%
2657
46%
472
-74%
2327
28%
1901
4%
1494 (345 - 1835, n=8)
-18%
Score Read
1662
759
-54%
1657
0%
471
-72%
2114
27%
1619
-3%
1306 (667 - 1719, n=8)
-21%
Access Time Write *
0.039
0.128
-228%
0.031
21%
0.039
-0%
0.025
36%
0.032
18%
0.0546 (0.027 - 0.143, n=8)
-40%
Access Time Read *
0.079
0.062
22%
0.07
11%
0.073
8%
0.063
20%
0.084
-6%
0.0795 (0.059 - 0.122, n=8)
-1%
4K-64 Write
1471.46
837.71
-43%
2298.97
56%
335.72
-77%
1919.91
30%
1538.26
5%
1215 (200 - 1502, n=8)
-17%
4K-64 Read
1414.07
583.45
-59%
1375.94
-3%
380
-73%
1779.73
26%
1282.6
-9%
1027 (416 - 1414, n=8)
-27%
4K Write
97.18
158.96
64%
118.42
22%
87.28
-10%
156.09
61%
118.58
22%
113 (28.9 - 153, n=8)
16%
4K Read
42.46
56.31
33%
54.56
28%
38.93
-8%
61.42
45%
40.56
-4%
44.2 (22.3 - 52.7, n=8)
4%
Seq Write
2562
1637.14
-36%
2393.08
-7%
495
-81%
2513.46
-2%
2439.74
-5%
1664 (908 - 2562, n=8)
-35%
Seq Read
2053
1196.64
-42%
2260.9
10%
524.4
-74%
2730.32
33%
2955.46
44%
2350 (1837 - 2772, n=8)
14%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
-14% / -20%
8% / 10%
-50% / -51%
26% / 26%
-1% / -2%
-10% / -11%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

CrystalDiskMark 3.0
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
Sequential Read: 1549 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1608 MB/s
512K Read: 791.7 MB/s
512K Write: 879.5 MB/s
4K Read: 34.27 MB/s
4K Write: 107.2 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 503.5 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 422.2 MB/s

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120113011401150116011701180119012001210122012301240125012601270128012901300131013201330134013501360137013801390140014101420143014401450146014701480149015001510152015301540155015601570158015901600161016201630164016501660167016801690170017101720173017401750176017701780179018001810182018301840185018601870188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020203020402050206020702080209021002110212021302140215021602170218021902200221022202230224022502260227022802290230023102320233023402350236023702380239024002410242024302440245024602470248024902500251025202530254025502560257025802590260026102620263026402650266026702680269027002710272027302740275027602770278027902800281028202830284028502860287028802890290029102920Tooltip
: Ø2782 (2547.2-2912.31)
3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (18610 - 22670, n=24)
20096 Points ∼100% 0%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i5-10300H
20056 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
19924 Points ∼99% -1%
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
18653 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=734)
14980 Points ∼75% -25%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Radeon RX 5300M, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
14437 Points ∼72% -28%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-9300H
13447 Points ∼67% -33%
Nexoc GH5 515IG
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-10300H
12447 Points ∼62% -38%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (368 - 13013, n=273)
6073 Points ∼100% +6%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i5-10300H
5735 Points ∼94%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (5335 - 6123, n=22)
5653 Points ∼93% -1%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
5607 Points ∼92% -2%
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
5130 Points ∼84% -11%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-9300H
3565 Points ∼59% -38%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Radeon RX 5300M, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
3539 Points ∼58% -38%
Nexoc GH5 515IG
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-10300H
3381 Points ∼56% -41%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
14922 Points ∼100% +1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (14186 - 16488, n=24)
14867 Points ∼100% +1%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i5-10300H
14746 Points ∼99%
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
13870 Points ∼93% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=658)
12424 Points ∼83% -16%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Radeon RX 5300M, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
10550 Points ∼71% -28%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-9300H
9536 Points ∼64% -35%
Nexoc GH5 515IG
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-10300H
9311 Points ∼62% -37%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i5-10300H
101308 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
98035 Points ∼97% -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (59839 - 104780, n=18)
94171 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (5761 - 184578, n=625)
72357 Points ∼71% -29%
Nexoc GH5 515IG
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-10300H
64543 Points ∼64% -36%
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
63086 Points ∼62% -38%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel Core i5-9300H
57365 Points ∼57% -43%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Radeon RX 5300M, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
55837 Points ∼55% -45%
3DMark 11 Performance
16523 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
119496 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
31686 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
12767 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
6478 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
4946 points
Aide
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (51.6 - 65.1, n=21)
56.2 fps ∼100% +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=426)
54.3 fps ∼97% 0%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
54.2 (42min) fps ∼96% 0%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
54.2 (46min - 63max) fps ∼96%
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
51.3 (47min - 56max) fps ∼91% -5%
Nexoc GH5 515IG
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
38.5 fps ∼69% -29%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5300M
38.3 (31min) fps ∼68% -29%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
37 fps ∼66% -32%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (93 - 120, n=17)
105 fps ∼100% +1%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
104 (92min - 111max) fps ∼99%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
101 (84min) fps ∼96% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.1 - 223, n=360)
95.9 fps ∼91% -8%
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
94.5 (85min - 105max) fps ∼90% -9%
Nexoc GH5 515IG
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
67.2 fps ∼64% -35%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
62.2 fps ∼59% -40%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5300M
60 (48min) fps ∼57% -42%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
179 (160min - 196max) fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (148 - 200, n=14)
176 fps ∼98% -2%
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
166.5 (156min - 175max) fps ∼93% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (20.9 - 332, n=232)
159 fps ∼89% -11%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5300M
122 (89min) fps ∼68% -32%
Nexoc GH5 515IG
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
118.4 fps ∼66% -34%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
109.6 fps ∼61% -39%
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
257.5 (235min - 272max) fps ∼100% +1%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
256 (213min - 294max) fps ∼99%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (177 - 298, n=14)
254 fps ∼99% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (17 - 472, n=219)
225 fps ∼87% -12%
Nexoc GH5 515IG
Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
187.9 fps ∼73% -27%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5300M
178 (129min) fps ∼69% -30%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
157.1 fps ∼61% -39%
05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i5-10300H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G: Ø54 (49-58)
Bas Moyen Élevé Ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 309.5 277.4 258.1 137 fps
GTA V (2015) 164 133 71.8 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 256 179 104 54.2 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 143.5 126.8 119 113.6 fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 232 166 97.8 87.4 fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 133 81.4 59.9 fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 85.7 77.8 67.1 fps
Far Cry 5 (2018) 124 97 90 85 fps
Strange Brigade (2018) 292 144 114 97.4 fps
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) 106 88 85 76 fps
Metro Exodus (2019) 129 72.5 54.9 43.1 fps

Degré de la nuisance sonore

Au repos
32.4 / 32.4 / 32.4 dB(A)
Fortement sollicité
32.5 / 51.9 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencieux
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
bruyant
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (à 15 cm de distance)   environment noise: 27 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.632.429.228.233.12542.437.536.732.3403142.23735.234.140.34035.731.232.625.834.35031.827.130.427.134.56330.724.125.425.531.48030.925.621.720.737.61002823.420.718.528.412530.126.726.418.829.816029.825.526.51830.220031.122.62217.131.225032.922.421.816.232.731535.721.921.614.93540034.721.520.414.6365003520.720.214.835.463034.720.419.414.335.880037.321.521.214.337100040.222.322.11440.5125041.42322.413.941.2160040.422.823.414.140.3200043.323.323.314.143.225004319.619.414.642.6315042.517.817.514.642.6400040.116.315.814.740.4500036.119.319.414.835.8630034.616.31614.834.3800032.315.415.115.1321000027.415.815.415.227.41250026.415.715.316.426.1160002215.715.515.422.2SPL51.932.632.426.751.9N7.71.71.60.87.8median 34.7median 21.5median 20.4median 14.8median 35.4Delta5.12.82.40.75.2hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP Omen 15-ek0456ng
A pleine charge
 37.6 °C39.8 °C40.2 °C 
 29 °C40 °C34.2 °C 
 27.2 °C26.8 °C29.9 °C 
Maximum: 40.2 °C
Moyenne: 33.9 °C
39.4 °C42.6 °C38.2 °C
39.1 °C48.4 °C32.3 °C
29.8 °C29.4 °C27.8 °C
Maximum: 48.4 °C
Moyenne: 36.3 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  53.5 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 24.4 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.4 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 39.8 °C / 104 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.4 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 42.6 °C / 109 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.9 °C / 85.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.1 °C / -2 F).
HP Omen 15 - Options Bang & Olufsen.
HP Omen 15 - Options Bang & Olufsen.
HP Omen 15 - Options Bang & Olufsen.
HP Omen 15 - Options Bang & Olufsen.
HP Omen 15 - Options Bang & Olufsen.
HP Omen 15 - Options Bang & Olufsen.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.228.232.22537.632.337.63137.834.137.84029.725.829.75030.427.130.46325.925.525.9802420.72410025.418.525.412533.218.833.216035.31835.320031.217.131.22503816.23831544.714.944.740052.514.652.55005614.8566305814.35880059.714.359.7100054.71454.7125051.913.951.9160047.914.147.920005014.150250051.414.651.4315055.114.655.1400054.114.754.1500054.514.854.5630057.814.857.8800058.115.158.1100005415.254125005216.4521600045.815.445.8SPL6726.767N22.10.822.1median 52median 14.8median 52Delta5.70.75.741.738.141.73334.7333029.63025.826.225.827.325.427.334.332.634.338.529.638.551.428.151.456.622.356.660.320.260.359.120.159.156.521.456.560.720.960.760.720.260.760.419.960.461.91961.963.620.563.660.520.460.560.421.660.466.220.966.265.119.365.163.418.663.46917.76973.318.173.37315.67373.814.673.870.113.870.166.615.466.665.41465.472.11372.181318148.61.448.6median 63.4median 19.9median 63.43.71.93.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Omen 15-ek0456ngAsus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (58.08 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.1 / 0.25 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 9.2 / 14.6 / 18.1 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 84 / 194 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60		Asus Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76
R7 4800HS, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60		Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60		Nexoc GH5 515IG
i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Samsung SSD 860 Evo 512GB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60		MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5300M, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 15.60		HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60		Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
 		Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
38%
7%
33%
1%
35%
-22%
-49%
Idle Minimum *
9.2
5.1
45%
9
2%
3
67%
11
-20%
4.04
56%
12.4 (3.9 - 20, n=19)
-35%
18.7 (1.9 - 113, n=801)
-103%
Idle Average *
14.6
8.4
42%
12
18%
7
52%
14
4%
7.2
51%
18 (8.9 - 30.7, n=19)
-23%
24.1 (6 - 119, n=801)
-65%
Idle Maximum *
18.1
9.1
50%
18
1%
16
12%
25
-38%
11.4
37%
25.3 (12.2 - 56.3, n=19)
-40%
29.7 (8.3 - 122, n=801)
-64%