Notebookcheck

Test du Schenker XMG Core 15 (i7-9750H, GTX 1660 Ti, FHD, 144 Hz, Tongfang GK5CP6V) : PC portable gamer à petit prix

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser, ✓ Andrea Grüblinger (traduit par Prévots), 02/21/2020

Du jeu pour les masses. Le XMG Core 15 de Schenker Technologies est un portable de jeu comparativement léger et compact, disponible avec des composants efficaces pour moins de 1 500 €. Découvrez dans nos tests comment le portable de 15 pouces se situe face à la concurrence.

Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
Processeur
Intel Core i7-9750H
Carte graphique
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile - 6144 Mo, Processeur: 1455 MHz, Mémoire: 1500 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 436.48, Optimus
Mémoire
16384 Mo 
, 2x 8 Go SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, double canal, tous les emplacements occupés, jusqu'à 64 Go
Écran
15.6 pouces 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPP, BOEhydis NV156FHM-N4G (BOE084D), IPS, Full HD, 144 Hz, brillant: non
Carte mère
Intel HM370
Disque dur
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB, 500 Go 
, 2 emplacements M.2 2280, 1 emplacement 2,5 pouces
Carte son
Realtek ALC269 @ Intel Cannon Point PCH
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Encoche de Sécurité Kensington, Connectique audio: écouteurs, micro, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: SD, SDHC, SDXC, MMC
Réseau
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 26 x 360 x 244
Batterie
46 Wh, 4100 mAh Lithium-Ion
Système d'exploitation
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Appareil photo
Webcam: HD
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: 2.0, Clavier: chiclet RVB, Rétroéclairage du clavier: oui, adaptateur secteur 180 watts, clé USB avec logiciels et pilotes, accessoires pour 2,5 pouces, Control Center, 24 Mois Garantie
Poids
1.99 kg, Alimentation: 420 g
Prix
1476 EUR
Liens
Schenker Page d'accueil
Schenker Section dédiée aux ordinateurs portables
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Note
Date
Modèle
Poids
Épaisseur
Taille
Résolution
Best Price
81 %
02/20
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		2 kg26 mm15.6"1920x1080
84 %
09/19
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		2.1 kg19.9 mm15.6"1920x1080
83 %
10/19
Asus Zephyrus M GU502GU-XB74
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		2 kg18.9 mm15.6"1920x1080
86 %
08/19
Aorus 15-SA
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		2.1 kg24.4 mm15.6"1920x1080
83 %
08/19
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		2.2 kg26 mm15.6"1920x1080
83 %
11/19
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		2.3 kg23.2 mm15.6"1920x1080

Comparaison des tailles

365 mm 260 mm 26 mm 2.2 kg360 mm 244 mm 26 mm 2 kg361 mm 246 mm 24.4 mm 2.1 kg361.4 mm 254.2 mm 23.2 mm 2.3 kg360 mm 252 mm 18.9 mm 2 kg355 mm 235 mm 19.9 mm 2.1 kg
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 206, n=269)
91.6 MB/s ∼100% +298%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
23 MB/s ∼25%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=267)
109 MB/s ∼100% +319%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26 MB/s ∼24%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
1380 MBit/s ∼100%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
672 (min: 658, max: 682) MBit/s ∼49% -51%
Aorus 15-SA
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
670 MBit/s ∼49% -51%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
649 MBit/s ∼47% -53%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
619 MBit/s ∼45% -55%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
1140 MBit/s ∼100%
Aorus 15-SA
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
683 MBit/s ∼60% -40%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
659 MBit/s ∼58% -42%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
653 (min: 615, max: 670) MBit/s ∼57% -43%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
630 MBit/s ∼55% -45%
ColorChecker
13 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
21.7 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
15 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
26.7 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V: 14.34 ∆E min: 4.6 - max: 26.66 ∆E
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V mire de test.
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V mire de test.
Schenker XMG Core 15
Schenker XMG Core 15
Schenker XMG Core 15
Schenker XMG Core 15
Schenker XMG Core 15
Schenker XMG Core 15
295
cd/m²		287
cd/m²		295
cd/m²
288
cd/m²		324
cd/m²		285
cd/m²
284
cd/m²		312
cd/m²		293
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
BOEhydis NV156FHM-N4G (BOE084D)
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 324 cd/m² Moyenne: 295.9 cd/m² Minimum: 12 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 88 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 324 cd/m²
Contraste: 1200:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.07 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9, calibrated: 1.49
ΔE Greyscale 4.01 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
91% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.6
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
BOEhydis NV156FHM-N4G (BOE084D), IPS, 1920x1080		Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
BOE NV156FHM-N4K, IPS, 1920x1080		Asus Zephyrus M GU502GU-XB74
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2, IPS, 1920x1080		Aorus 15-SA
LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB2 (LGD05E8), IPS, 1920x1080		Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
BOE 084D, IPS, 1920x1080		Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY
AUO, B156HAN08.2, IPS, 1920x1080
Response Times
-26%
21%
-50%
-8%
-29%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
8.8 (4.4, 4.4)
13.6 (7.2, 6.4)
-55%
6.4 (3.4, 3)
27%
15.6 (8, 7.6)
-77%
8.8 (4, 4.4)
-0%
15 (8, 7)
-70%
Response Time Black / White *
10.4 (5.2, 5.2)
10 (6, 4)
4%
8.8 (4.4, 4.4)
15%
12.8 (8.4, 4.4)
-23%
12 (6.8, 5.2)
-15%
9 (5, 4)
13%
PWM Frequency
200 (99)
Screen
-11%
-15%
-1%
-6%
-4%
Brightness middle
324
312.7
-3%
297.7
-8%
266
-18%
299
-8%
325
0%
Brightness
296
305
3%
280
-5%
254
-14%
290
-2%
310
5%
Brightness Distribution
88
90
2%
84
-5%
90
2%
89
1%
82
-7%
Black Level *
0.27
0.27
-0%
0.43
-59%
0.28
-4%
0.29
-7%
0.255
6%
Contrast
1200
1158
-3%
692
-42%
950
-21%
1031
-14%
1275
6%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.07
4.57
-12%
3.13
23%
3.11
24%
3.7
9%
4.28
-5%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.39
6.81
-7%
7.1
-11%
5.84
9%
7
-10%
8.42
-32%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.49
2.91
-95%
3.06
-105%
1.37
8%
2
-34%
1.45
3%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.01
4.3
-7%
1.9
53%
3.94
2%
4.1
-2%
5.01
-25%
Gamma
2.6 85%
2.29 96%
2.23 99%
2.53 87%
2.19 100%
2.6 85%
CCT
7350 88%
7098 92%
6325 103%
6210 105%
7166 91%
7678 85%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
59
59.4
1%
59.2
0%
60
2%
59.3
1%
60
2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
91
91.3
0%
90.5
-1%
93
2%
91.5
1%
93
2%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
-19% / -13%
3% / -9%
-26% / -8%
-7% / -6%
-17% / -8%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Temps de réponse de l'écran

ℹ
Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
   ↔    Temps de réponse noir à blanc
10.4 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 5.2 ms hausse
↘ 5.2 ms chute
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 10 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (24.9 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
   ↔    Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
8.8 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 4.4 ms hausse
↘ 4.4 ms chute
L'écran montre de faibles temps de réponse, un bon écran pour jouer.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (39.6 ms) de tous les appareils testés.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

ℹ
Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 50 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 17159 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 2500000) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
AS SSD Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark
LatencyMon
01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120113011401150116011701180119012001210122012301240125012601270Tooltip
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1012 (995.35-1103.17)
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø925 (918.74-983.02)
Asus Zephyrus M GU502GU-XB74 Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1248 (1233.43-1260.16)
Aorus 15-SA Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1093 (1085.04-1129.94)
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1147 (899.54-1211.72)
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1113 (1102.29-1169.32)
Cinebench R20 | Cinebench R15
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Asus Zephyrus M GU502GU-XB74
Intel Core i7-9750H
468 Points ∼100% +5%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY
Intel Core i7-9750H
459 Points ∼98% +3%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
Intel Core i7-9750H
458 Points ∼98% +2%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
Intel Core i7-9750H
447 Points ∼96%
Aorus 15-SA
Intel Core i7-9750H
420 Points ∼90% -6%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
Intel Core i7-9750H
419 Points ∼90% -6%
CPU (Multi Core)
Asus Zephyrus M GU502GU-XB74
Intel Core i7-9750H
3015 Points ∼100% +41%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY
Intel Core i7-9750H
2599 Points ∼86% +21%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
Intel Core i7-9750H
2595 Points ∼86% +21%
Aorus 15-SA
Intel Core i7-9750H
2419 Points ∼80% +13%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
Intel Core i7-9750H
2140 Points ∼71%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
Intel Core i7-9750H
2074 Points ∼69% -3%
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus Zephyrus M GU502GU-XB74
Intel Core i7-9750H
193 Points ∼100% +1%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
Intel Core i7-9750H
191 Points ∼99%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY
Intel Core i7-9750H
190 Points ∼98% -1%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
Intel Core i7-9750H
187 Points ∼97% -2%
Aorus 15-SA
Intel Core i7-9750H
173 Points ∼90% -9%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
Intel Core i7-9750H
170 Points ∼88% -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Zephyrus M GU502GU-XB74
Intel Core i7-9750H
1268 Points ∼100% +15%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY
Intel Core i7-9750H
1170 Points ∼92% +6%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
Intel Core i7-9750H
1155 (min: 899.54, max: 1211.72) Points ∼91% +5%
Aorus 15-SA
Intel Core i7-9750H
1130 Points ∼89% +2%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
Intel Core i7-9750H
1103 (min: 995.35, max: 1103.17) Points ∼87%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
Intel Core i7-9750H
964 Points ∼76% -13%
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1103 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
125 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
191 Points
Aide
PCMark 10 - Score
Aorus 15-SA
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5761 Points ∼100% +20%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
5716 Points ∼99% +19%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5301 Points ∼92% +10%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
5279 Points ∼92% +10%
Asus Zephyrus M GU502GU-XB74
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5273 Points ∼92% +10%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
4807 Points ∼83%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB		Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ		Asus Zephyrus M GU502GU-XB74
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8		Aorus 15-SA
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8		Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G		Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
5%
-4%
4%
7%
11%
Write 4K
102
135
32%
156
53%
104
2%
158.8
56%
108.7
7%
Read 4K
41.39
41.1
-1%
60.7
47%
55.11
33%
29.11
-30%
44.91
9%
Write Seq
1649
1427
-13%
967.7
-41%
1519
-8%
1584
-4%
2424
47%
Read Seq
1367
1494
9%
1619
18%
2486
82%
1694
24%
1617
18%
Write 4K Q32T1
379
494.9
31%
485
28%
320.5
-15%
535.7
41%
356.9
-6%
Read 4K Q32T1
401.2
578.2
44%
337.3
-16%
431.8
8%
363.9
-9%
556.8
39%
Write Seq Q32T1
3276
1417
-57%
968.7
-70%
1498
-54%
2536
-23%
2541.8
-22%
Read Seq Q32T1
3417
3251
-5%
1825
-47%
2868
-16%
3458
1%
3217.7
-6%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3417 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3276 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 401.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 379 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1367 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1649 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 41.39 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 102 MB/s
3DMark 11 Performance
17351 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
35204 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
13267 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
5724 points
Aide
0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB: Ø55.8 (51-61)
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Aorus 15-SA
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
5931 Points ∼100% +6%
Asus Zephyrus M GU502GU-XB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
5661 Points ∼95% +1%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
5616 Points ∼95% 0%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
5607 Points ∼95%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
5335 Points ∼90% -5%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Aorus 15-SA
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
15164 Points ∼100% +2%
Asus Zephyrus M GU502GU-XB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
15054 Points ∼99% +1%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
14922 Points ∼98%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
14753 Points ∼97% -1%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
14358 Points ∼95% -4%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
14288 Points ∼94% -4%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Aorus 15-SA
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
20862 Points ∼100% +5%
Asus Zephyrus M GU502GU-XB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
20311 Points ∼97% +2%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
19924 Points ∼96%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
19553 Points ∼94% -2%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
19435 Points ∼93% -2%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
19329 Points ∼93% -3%
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Aorus 15-SA
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
57.1 (min: 46) fps ∼100% +5%
Asus Zephyrus M GU502GU-XB74
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
55.2 fps ∼97% +2%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
54.6 (min: 48, max: 62) fps ∼96% +1%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
54.2 (min: 42) fps ∼95%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
53.1 (min: 50, max: 58, 99th percentile: 51) fps ∼93% -2%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
51.6 fps ∼90% -5%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Aorus 15-SA
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
104.3 fps ∼100% +3%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
101 (min: 84) fps ∼97%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
97.5 fps ∼93% -3%
Asus Zephyrus M GU502GU-XB74
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
95.9 fps ∼92% -5%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
93 (min: 84, max: 103) fps ∼89% -8%
Bas Moyen Élevé Ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 101 54.2 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 144 131 124 118 fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 107 92.7 78.6 fps
Apex Legends (2019) 131 108 107 fps
Anthem (2019) 75.2 73.2 71 fps
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) 144 123 65.6 fps
The Division 2 (2019) 98 78 57 fps
Control (2019) 69.2 50.7 fps
Borderlands 3 (2019) 91.7 61.7 46.6 fps
FIFA 20 (2019) 192 181 179 fps
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) 79 70 51 fps
GRID 2019 (2019) 119 90.5 61.7 fps
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019) 99 88.1 71.9 fps
Need for Speed Heat (2019) 87.9 79.7 67.4 fps
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) 94.7 84.9 77.7 fps
Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019) 75.3 50.5 31.2 fps
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.332.931.53232.62540.641.342.53838.5313333.431.630.733.74035.933.531.629.232.85046.541.332.628.936.96344.234.827.42636.18035.130.926.526.840.110032.932.525.724.628.812534.43326.725.129.91603534.328.825.732.420030.626.924.522.730.525031.627.123.220.931.631532.525.22320.433.540034.823.822.919.63750035.923.820.918.837.263035.622.919.617.937.880037.12219.417.438100037.221.819.117.439.7125037.62218.618.139.6160036.820.818.917.939.7200038.123.418.317.540.7250036.419.917.817.438.9315037.118.917.817.540.4400037.518.417.417.539.550003418.217.717.639.2630030.91817.717.435.4800029.218.117.617.533.41000025.518.117.817.731.21250021.718.217.717.526.21600018.918.217.917.721.3SPL4833.5313050.7N6.52.11.61.37.7median 34.8median 22median 18.9median 17.7median 37Delta3.44.12.31.54.2hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseSchenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V

Degré de la nuisance sonore

Au repos
30 / 31 / 33 dB(A)
Fortement sollicité
48 / 51 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencieux
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
bruyant
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (à 15 cm de distance)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		Asus Zephyrus M GU502GU-XB74
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		Aorus 15-SA
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Noise
5%
2%
-9%
10%
5%
off / environment *
30
28.5
5%
28.2
6%
29
3%
29.3
2%
30.2
-1%
Idle Minimum *
30
30.3
-1%
28.7
4%
32
-7%
29.3
2%
31
-3%
Idle Average *
31
30.5
2%
30.5
2%
35
-13%
29.3
5%
31
-0%
Idle Maximum *
33
30.5
8%
31
6%
41
-24%
29.3
11%
31
6%
Load Average *
48
41
15%
39
19%
54
-13%
35.7
26%
41.5
14%
Witcher 3 ultra *
51
48
6%
54.2
-6%
52
-2%
44.2
13%
46.7
8%
Load Maximum *
51
51.9
-2%
59.6
-17%
56
-10%
45.6
11%
46.9
8%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

A pleine charge
 46 °C48 °C42 °C 
 44 °C45 °C40 °C 
 28 °C33 °C31 °C 
Maximum: 48 °C
Moyenne: 39.7 °C
56 °C59 °C45 °C
53 °C50 °C32 °C
27 °C26 °C24 °C
Maximum: 59 °C
Moyenne: 41.3 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  48 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 39.6 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 59 °C / 138 F, compared to the average of 42.3 °C / 108 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37 °C / 98.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (-8.3 °C / -14.9 F).
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		Asus Zephyrus M GU502GU-XB74
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		Aorus 15-SA
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Heat
-20%
-15%
-6%
-12%
8%
Maximum Upper Side *
48
52
-8%
49.8
-4%
44
8%
42.7
11%
52
-8%
Maximum Bottom *
59
52.2
12%
63.2
-7%
58
2%
52.7
11%
46.3
22%
Idle Upper Side *
27
38
-41%
32
-19%
30
-11%
33.1
-23%
24.8
8%
Idle Bottom *
28
40.4
-44%
36.2
-29%
34
-21%
41
-46%
25.4
9%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203234.5253839.43130.7354029.229.65028.932.7632628.98026.827.810024.626.212525.130.616025.732.120022.732.425020.945.331520.453.540019.658.250018.860.363017.965.180017.472100017.469.9125018.161.6160017.962.1200017.563.1250017.460.1315017.559.8400017.559.7500017.662.2630017.461.1800017.559.31000017.754.31250017.554.81600017.748.5SPL3076.1N1.335.9median 17.7median 59.7Delta1.57.640.74438.340.540.838.837.938.538.63938.540.135.436.634.338.835.142.233.649.532.952.732.359.131.964.730.867.93168.330.170.330.171.130.872.729.170.228.770.828.668.528.56828.365.92867.527.96127.858.527.856.927.753.927.549.827.447.441.180.14.247.3median 29.1median 64.72.17.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSchenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6VRazer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.14 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.4 / 0.9 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 9 / 12 / 18 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 86 / 173 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		Asus Zephyrus M GU502GU-XB74
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		Aorus 15-SA
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Power Consumption
-67%
-77%
-47%
-24%
-45%
Idle Minimum *
9
18.7
-108%
17.6
-96%
20
-122%
14.5
-61%
17.2
-91%
Idle Average *
12
30.7
-156%
24.7
-106%
23
-92%
18.5
-54%
22.6
-88%
Idle Maximum *
18
33.9
-88%
56.3
-213%
29
-61%
20
-11%
25.5
-42%
Load Average *
86
93.4
-9%
111.1
-29%
87
-1%
81.6
5%
88
-2%
Load Maximum *
173
195.3
-13%
170
2%
173
-0%
208.1
-20%
177
-2%
Witcher 3 ultra *
126
158.9
-26%
149
-18%
136
-8%
132
-5%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
Au repos (module WiFi éteint, luminosité au minimum)
6h 04min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
3h 36min
Fortement sollicité (luminosité au maximum)
0h 44min
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 46 Wh		Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 65 Wh		Asus Zephyrus M GU502GU-XB74
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 76 Wh		Aorus 15-SA
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 62 Wh		Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH-81SX00B2GE
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 57 Wh		Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 58.75 Wh
Autonomie de la batterie
53%
57%
37%
2%
15%
Reader / Idle
364
424
16%
208
-43%
240
-34%
298
-18%
WiFi v1.3
216
330
53%
268
24%
169
-22%
145
-33%
210
-3%
Load
44
101
130%
122
177%
76
73%
73
66%
H.264
166
202

Points positifs

+ configurable
+ poids
+ écran IPS
+ bordures d'écran
+ 144 Hz

Points négatifs

- niveau sonore en cas de sollicitations
- absence de Thunderbolt 3 et d'USB 3.1 Gen. 2
- qualité sonore
- autonomie
En test : le Schenker XMG Core 15. Modèle de test fourni par bestware.com.
En test : le Schenker XMG Core 15. Modèle de test fourni par bestware.com.

Dans nos tests, le XMG Core 15 s’est avéré être une bonne alternative aux produits de fabricants plus connus (Acer, Asus, Lenovo…).

Pour un prix contenu, Schenker Technologies propose un portable de 15 pouces adapté au jeu avec un bon écran IPS réactif. Le rétroéclairage RVB du clavier plaira également aux joueurs. Grâce à son poids réduit et à ses dimensions compactes, le Core 15 est également étonnamment mobile, si l’on passe outre l’autonomie médiocre.

Le fabricant Tongfang devrait améliorer la connectivité (il n’y a ni Thunderbolt 3 ni USB 3.1 Gen. 2) et - comme souvent avec les machines de jeu - le niveau sonore en cas de sollicitations.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V - 02/09/2020 v7
Florian Glaser

Châssis
72 / 98 → 73%
Clavier
83%
Dispositif de pointage
78%
Connectivité
59 / 80 → 74%
Poids
63 / 10-66 → 95%
Autonomie
55 / 95 → 58%
Écran
85%
Performances en jeu
89%
Performances dans les applications
91%
Chauffe
83 / 95 → 88%
Nuisance sonore
75 / 90 → 83%
Audio
69%
Appareil photo
27 / 85 → 31%
Moyenne
71%
81%
Gaming - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Schenker XMG Core 15
Schenker XMG Core 15
Schenker XMG Core 15
Schenker XMG Core 15
Schenker XMG Core 15
Schenker XMG Core 15
Schenker XMG Core 15
Schenker XMG Core 15
Schenker XMG Core 15
Schenker XMG Core 15
Schenker XMG Core 15
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Test du Schenker XMG Core 15 (i7-9750H, GTX 1660 Ti, FHD, 144 Hz, Tongfang GK5CP6V) : PC portable gamer à petit prix
Florian Glaser, 2020-02-21 (Update: 2020-02-21)