Notebookcheck

Test du Realme X50 Pro : rapport performances / prix au top ?

Des haut et des bas. Le X50 Pro brille avec un châssis réussi et de bonnes spécifications. Le flagship Realme manque cependant d'un certain nombre de fonctionnalités premium par rapport à la concurrence haut de gamme. Dans ce test, nous allons découvrir les défauts du X50 Pro.
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduit par Prévots),
realme X50 Pro (X Gamme)
Processeur
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 8 x 2.4 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Carte graphique
Mémoire
12288 Mo 
Écran
6.44 pouces 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 409 PPP, capacitif, OLED, brillant: oui, HDR, 90 Hz
Disque dur
256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 256 Go 
, 227 Go libres
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, Connectique audio: USB C, 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: accéléromètre, gyroscope, capteur de proximité, boussole, OTG, Miracast
Réseau
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.1, 5G NR : n77 / 78 / 38 / 40 / 41 / 1 / 3 / 5 / 7 / 28 ; FDD-LTE : bandes 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 7 / 8 / 12 / 17 / 18 / 19 / 20 / 26 / 28 / 32 / 66 ; TD-LTE : bandes 38 / 39 / 40 / 41 / 42 ; WCDMA: B1 / 2 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 8 / 19 ; GSM : 850 / 900 / 1 800 / 1 90, LTE, 5G, GPS
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 8.9 x 158.96 x 74.24
Batterie
4200 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Système d'exploitation
Android 10
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 64 MPix (26 mm, FOV 78,6°, f/1,8, lentille 6P Samsung GW1, 1 / 1,72”) + 12 MP (54,0 mm, f/2,5, lentille 5P) + 8 MP (15,7 mm, FOV 119°) + 2 MP (FOV 88,8°, f/2,4), API Appareil photo 2: niveau 3
Appareil photo secondaire: 32 MPix (FOV 80,4°, f/2,5, lentille 5P Sony IMX 616) + 8 MP (FOV 105°, f/2,2, lentille 5P)
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: stéréo, Clavier: virtuel, câble USB, adaptateur secteur modulaire, étui de protection, protection d'écran, realme UI, 24 Mois Garantie, Widevine L1, fanless
Poids
205 g, Alimentation: 115 g
Prix
750 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Appareils du comparatif

Note
Date
Modèle
Poids
Drive
Taille
Résolution
Best Price
86 %
07/20
realme X50 Pro
SD 865, Adreno 650
205 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.44"2400x1080
88 %
07/20
Xiaomi Mi 10
SD 865, Adreno 650
208 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.67"2340x1080
88 %
07/20
OnePlus 8
SD 865, Adreno 650
180 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.55"2400x1080
87 %
05/20
Huawei P40
Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16
175 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.1"2340x1080
81 %
07/20
Motorola Edge
SD 765, Adreno 620
190 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.7"2340x1080
88 %
04/20
Samsung Galaxy S20
Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11
163 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.2"3200x1440

Comparaison des tailles

162.6 mm 74.8 mm 8.96 mm 208 g161.6 mm 71.1 mm 9.3 mm 190 g160.2 mm 72.9 mm 8 mm 180 g158.96 mm 74.24 mm 8.9 mm 205 g151.7 mm 69.1 mm 7.9 mm 163 g148.9 mm 71.1 mm 8.5 mm 175 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1368 (min: 1104, max: 1442) MBit/s ∼100% +50%
realme X50 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
914 (min: 888, max: 928) MBit/s ∼67%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
903 (min: 881, max: 916) MBit/s ∼66% -1%
OnePlus 8
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
894 (min: 864, max: 925) MBit/s ∼65% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
827 (min: 791, max: 846) MBit/s ∼60% -10%
Motorola Edge
Adreno 620, SD 765, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
561 (min: 216, max: 668) MBit/s ∼41% -39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=562)
267 MBit/s ∼20% -71%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei P40
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1296 (min: 1095, max: 1376) MBit/s ∼100% +53%
OnePlus 8
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
937 (min: 466, max: 960) MBit/s ∼72% +10%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
882 (min: 847, max: 902) MBit/s ∼68% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
867 (min: 440, max: 907) MBit/s ∼67% +2%
realme X50 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
849 (min: 414, max: 930) MBit/s ∼66%
Motorola Edge
Adreno 620, SD 765, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
657 (min: 608, max: 667) MBit/s ∼51% -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=562)
253 MBit/s ∼20% -70%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø912 (888-928)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø836 (414-930)
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS realme X50 Pro
GPS realme X50 Pro
GPS realme X50 Pro
GPS realme X50 Pro
GPS realme X50 Pro
GPS realme X50 Pro
Photo prise avec le X50 Pro : Ultra-grand-angle.
Photo prise avec le X50 Pro : Ultra-grand-angle.
Photo prise avec le X50 Pro : grand-angle.
Photo prise avec le X50 Pro : grand-angle.
Photo prise avec le X50 Pro : zoom x2.
Photo prise avec le X50 Pro : zoom x2.
Photo prise avec le X50 Pro : zoom x5.
Photo prise avec le X50 Pro : zoom x5.

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3Scene 4Scene 5
Cliquer pour charger les images
ColorChecker
27.6 ∆E
43 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
33.4 ∆E
40.3 ∆E
53.1 ∆E
41.9 ∆E
29.6 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
28.3 ∆E
52.1 ∆E
54.9 ∆E
29.9 ∆E
40.2 ∆E
23.1 ∆E
49.6 ∆E
34.2 ∆E
40.2 ∆E
46.7 ∆E
48.6 ∆E
44.5 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker realme X50 Pro: 37.51 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 54.92 ∆E
ColorChecker
21.4 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
16 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
7 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
ColorChecker realme X50 Pro: 11.42 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 24.46 ∆E
686
cd/m²
688
cd/m²
700
cd/m²
689
cd/m²
679
cd/m²
695
cd/m²
689
cd/m²
683
cd/m²
703
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 703 cd/m² Moyenne: 690.2 cd/m² Minimum: 3.85 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 97 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 679 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.2 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 4.1 | 0.64-98 Ø6
92.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.28
realme X50 Pro
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.44
Xiaomi Mi 10
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.67
OnePlus 8
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Huawei P40
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.1
Motorola Edge
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7
Samsung Galaxy S20
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.2
Screen
36%
37%
7%
-32%
19%
Brightness middle
679
786
16%
778
15%
583
-14%
427
-37%
745
10%
Brightness
690
791
15%
783
13%
593
-14%
438
-37%
740
7%
Brightness Distribution
97
96
-1%
95
-2%
94
-3%
94
-3%
97
0%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.2
1.1
66%
0.9
72%
3.03
5%
5.34
-67%
2.67
17%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.2
2.2
65%
2.2
65%
5.33
14%
9.33
-50%
4.52
27%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.1
1.8
56%
1.7
59%
2
51%
4
2%
2
51%
Gamma
2.28 96%
2.26 97%
2.25 98%
2.301 96%
2.315 95%
2.092 105%
CCT
6604 98%
6315 103%
6481 100%
6621 98%
7221 90%
6240 104%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) décelé 367.6 Hz ≤ 99 Niveau de luminosité

Le rétroéclairage de l'écran scintille à la fréquence de 367.6 Hz (certainement du fait de l'utilisation d'une MDI - Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) à un niveau de luminosité inférieur ou égal à 99 % . Aucun scintillement ne devrait être perceptible au-dessus de cette valeur.

La fréquence de rafraîchissement de 367.6 Hz est relativement élevée, la grande majorité des utilisateurs ne devrait pas percevLa fréquence de rafraîchissement de 367.6 Hz est relativement élevée, la grande majorité des utilisateurs ne devrait pas percevoir de scintillements et être sujette à une fatigue oculaire accrue.oir de scintillements et être sujette à une fatigue oculaire accrue. Néanmoins certaines personnes pourront toujours percevoir un scintillement.

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 17893 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 2500000) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
2.4 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 1.2 ms hausse
↘ 1.2 ms chute
L'écran montre de très faibles temps de réponse, parfait pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (24.5 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
3.2 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 2 ms hausse
↘ 1.2 ms chute
L'écran montre de très faibles temps de réponse, parfait pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (39 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
Vulkan Score 5.1 (Classer selon les valeurs)
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3259 Points ∼89%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
2549 Points ∼69% -22%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
2663 Points ∼73% -18%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
2693 Points ∼73% -17%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
977 Points ∼27% -70%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
3670 Points ∼100% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (2487 - 3259, n=8)
2723 Points ∼74% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 4043, n=66)
1633 Points ∼44% -50%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (Classer selon les valeurs)
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3067 Points ∼85%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
2829 Points ∼78% -8%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3001 Points ∼83% -2%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3606 Points ∼100% +18%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
1054 Points ∼29% -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (2829 - 3080, n=8)
2981 Points ∼83% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (272 - 4739, n=61)
1759 Points ∼49% -43%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3087 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3309 Points ∼97% +7%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3427 Points ∼100% +11%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
2988 Points ∼87% -3%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
1869 Points ∼55% -39%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
2731 Points ∼80% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (3076 - 3449, n=10)
3312 Points ∼97% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 3531, n=91)
1973 Points ∼58% -36%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
915 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
910 Points ∼99% -1%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
919 Points ∼100% 0%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
755 Points ∼82% -17%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
589 Points ∼64% -36%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
903 Points ∼98% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (903 - 924, n=10)
913 Points ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1342, n=91)
563 Points ∼61% -38%
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9576 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (9443 - 9739, n=5)
9559 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=352)
4861 Points ∼51% -49%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13589 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (13186 - 13589, n=5)
13396 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 13589, n=414)
4962 Points ∼37% -63%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4304 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (4261 - 4304, n=5)
4281 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=414)
1513 Points ∼35% -65%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13202 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
10613 Points ∼80% -20%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
10800 Points ∼82% -18%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
8736 Points ∼66% -34%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
8336 Points ∼63% -37%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
10431 Points ∼79% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (9822 - 13202, n=11)
11312 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 13202, n=493)
5835 Points ∼44% -56%
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
19711 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11850 Points ∼60% -40%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13079 Points ∼66% -34%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
11268 Points ∼57% -43%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
10045 Points ∼51% -49%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
14708 Points ∼75% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (11839 - 19711, n=10)
13515 Points ∼69% -31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19711, n=651)
6377 Points ∼32% -68%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3947 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3336 Points ∼85% -15%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3763 Points ∼95% -5%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3684 Points ∼93% -7%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
2810 Points ∼71% -29%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
3112 Points ∼79% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (3193 - 3947, n=8)
3699 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4057, n=151)
2634 Points ∼67% -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8263 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8175 Points ∼99% -1%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8294 Points ∼100% 0%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6326 Points ∼76% -23%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
2786 Points ∼34% -66%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6315 Points ∼76% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8076 - 8321, n=8)
8231 Points ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 8783, n=151)
2899 Points ∼35% -65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6644 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
6182 Points ∼93% -7%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6543 Points ∼98% -2%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5456 Points ∼82% -18%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
2791 Points ∼42% -58%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
5139 Points ∼77% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (6106 - 6644, n=9)
6479 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6644, n=151)
2613 Points ∼39% -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5523 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5187 Points ∼94% -6%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5401 Points ∼98% -2%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4924 Points ∼89% -11%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
3442 Points ∼62% -38%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4063 Points ∼74% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (5187 - 5780, n=9)
5429 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=499)
2173 Points ∼39% -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9567 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9389 Points ∼98% -2%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9542 Points ∼100% 0%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6606 Points ∼69% -31%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
3165 Points ∼33% -67%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
8106 Points ∼85% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (9157 - 9567, n=9)
9408 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9567, n=499)
2070 Points ∼22% -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8204 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7957 Points ∼97% -3%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8153 Points ∼99% -1%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6140 Points ∼75% -25%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
3223 Points ∼39% -61%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6638 Points ∼81% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (7957 - 8204, n=10)
8086 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8204, n=500)
1923 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5478 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3973 Points ∼73% -27%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5406 Points ∼99% -1%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4998 Points ∼91% -9%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
3449 Points ∼63% -37%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
3935 Points ∼72% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (3956 - 5765, n=9)
5009 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=529)
2083 Points ∼38% -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12895 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12601 Points ∼98% -2%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12873 Points ∼100% 0%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4293 Points ∼33% -67%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
4829 Points ∼37% -63%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
11301 Points ∼88% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (12547 - 12895, n=9)
12716 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=529)
2758 Points ∼21% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9910 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8499 Points ∼86% -14%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9850 Points ∼99% -1%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4432 Points ∼45% -55%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
4435 Points ∼45% -55%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
7981 Points ∼81% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8499 - 10090, n=9)
9458 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=529)
2319 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5068 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4813 Points ∼95% -5%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4879 Points ∼96% -4%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4242 Points ∼84% -16%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
3435 Points ∼68% -32%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
3963 Points ∼78% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (4582 - 5209, n=9)
4956 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=579)
2060 Points ∼41% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8345 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8371 Points ∼100% 0%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8288 Points ∼99% -1%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6244 Points ∼74% -25%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
2897 Points ∼34% -65%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
8411 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8045 - 8432, n=9)
8282 Points ∼98% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=579)
1732 Points ∼21% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7293 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7190 Points ∼99% -1%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7174 Points ∼98% -2%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5651 Points ∼77% -23%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
3001 Points ∼41% -59%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6732 Points ∼92% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (7012 - 7323, n=10)
7198 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7323, n=580)
1655 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5034 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4196 Points ∼83% -17%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4819 Points ∼96% -4%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4279 Points ∼85% -15%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
3435 Points ∼68% -32%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4015 Points ∼80% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (3965 - 5274, n=9)
4783 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=621)
1924 Points ∼38% -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11533 Points ∼94%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12234 Points ∼100% +6%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11540 Points ∼94% 0%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3894 Points ∼32% -66%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
4671 Points ∼38% -59%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6388 Points ∼52% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (11371 - 12494, n=9)
11794 Points ∼96% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12494, n=620)
2275 Points ∼19% -80%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8947 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8581 Points ∼96% -4%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8810 Points ∼98% -2%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3973 Points ∼44% -56%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
4325 Points ∼48% -52%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
5646 Points ∼63% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8215 - 9492, n=9)
8887 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9492, n=623)
1960 Points ∼22% -78%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
33793 Points ∼94%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
27026 Points ∼75% -20%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
22857 Points ∼63% -32%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
20185 Points ∼56% -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (26182 - 58293, n=9)
36070 Points ∼100% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 58293, n=769)
15260 Points ∼42% -55%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
145603 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
144611 Points ∼97% -1%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
66142 Points ∼45% -55%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
62819 Points ∼42% -57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (144611 - 154375, n=9)
148492 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=767)
25903 Points ∼17% -82%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
83917 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
72524 Points ∼85% -14%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
46552 Points ∼54% -45%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
42752 Points ∼50% -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (72524 - 112989, n=9)
85586 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 112989, n=767)
20367 Points ∼24% -76%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
204 fps ∼99%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
202 fps ∼98% -1%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
207 fps ∼100% +1%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
151 fps ∼73% -26%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
87 fps ∼42% -57%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
199 fps ∼96% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (202 - 207, n=10)
204 fps ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=774)
43.9 fps ∼21% -78%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼67%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
90 fps ∼100% +50%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼67% 0%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼67% 0%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
78 fps ∼87% +30%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
60 fps ∼67% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (60 - 90, n=10)
72 fps ∼80% +20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=783)
30.5 fps ∼34% -49%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
124 fps ∼99%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
123 fps ∼98% -1%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
125 fps ∼100% +1%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
100 fps ∼80% -19%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
50 fps ∼40% -60%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
108 fps ∼86% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (120 - 126, n=10)
124 fps ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=679)
25.8 fps ∼21% -79%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼68%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
88 fps ∼100% +47%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼68% 0%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
46 fps ∼52% -23%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
48 fps ∼55% -20%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
60 fps ∼68% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (58 - 88, n=10)
69 fps ∼78% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=687)
21.8 fps ∼25% -64%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
86 fps ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
86 fps ∼98% 0%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
88 fps ∼100% +2%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
33 fps ∼38% -62%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
33 fps ∼38% -62%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
85 fps ∼97% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (74 - 88, n=11)
85.3 fps ∼97% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=542)
20.8 fps ∼24% -76%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼80%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
75 fps ∼100% +25%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼80% 0%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
57 fps ∼76% -5%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
32 fps ∼43% -47%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
59 fps ∼79% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (43 - 77, n=11)
58.1 fps ∼77% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=544)
18.9 fps ∼25% -68%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
30 fps ∼97%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
29 fps ∼94% -3%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
31 fps ∼100% +3%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
27 fps ∼87% -10%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
12 fps ∼39% -60%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
22 fps ∼71% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (18 - 31, n=11)
27.5 fps ∼89% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=291)
11.1 fps ∼36% -63%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
20 fps ∼69%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
20 fps ∼69% 0%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
20 fps ∼69% 0%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
29 fps ∼100% +45%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
7.5 fps ∼26% -62%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
20 fps ∼69% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (20 - 20, n=11)
20 fps ∼69% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=289)
8 fps ∼28% -60%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
46 fps ∼92%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
46 fps ∼92% 0%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
48 fps ∼96% +4%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
42 fps ∼84% -9%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
20 fps ∼40% -57%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
50 fps ∼100% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (28 - 53, n=11)
43.6 fps ∼87% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=295)
16.6 fps ∼33% -64%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
53 fps ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
53 fps ∼98% 0%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
54 fps ∼100% +2%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
49 fps ∼91% -8%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
21 fps ∼39% -60%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
54 fps ∼100% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (27 - 54, n=11)
51 fps ∼94% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=294)
19.2 fps ∼36% -64%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
51 fps ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
50 fps ∼96% -2%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
52 fps ∼100% +2%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
43 fps ∼83% -16%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
19 fps ∼37% -63%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
50 fps ∼96% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (49 - 52, n=11)
50.6 fps ∼97% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=467)
14 fps ∼27% -73%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
44 fps ∼96%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
42 fps ∼91% -5%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
46 fps ∼100% +5%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
36 fps ∼78% -18%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
18 fps ∼39% -59%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
43 fps ∼93% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (25 - 46, n=11)
38.9 fps ∼85% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=471)
12.4 fps ∼27% -72%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
593933 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
566256 Points ∼95% -5%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
563466 Points ∼95% -5%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
450373 Points ∼76% -24%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
304120 Points ∼51% -49%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
504192 Points ∼85% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (557310 - 607937, n=11)
580619 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 607937, n=96)
312334 Points ∼53% -47%
BaseMark OS II
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1576 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
1276 Points ∼81% -19%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1498 Points ∼95% -5%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
1260 Points ∼80% -20%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
1399 Points ∼89% -11%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
1274 Points ∼81% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (1276 - 1576, n=10)
1450 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=711)
808 Points ∼51% -49%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11688 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11730 Points ∼100% 0%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11654 Points ∼99% 0%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
8634 Points ∼74% -26%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
4681 Points ∼40% -60%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
10703 Points ∼91% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (11445 - 11842, n=10)
11655 Points ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=711)
2428 Points ∼21% -79%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8204 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7450 Points ∼91% -9%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6912 Points ∼84% -16%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6942 Points ∼85% -15%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
4528 Points ∼55% -45%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4271 Points ∼52% -48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (5564 - 8874, n=10)
7263 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=711)
1809 Points ∼22% -78%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
10147 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9810 Points ∼97% -3%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
10021 Points ∼99% -1%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
8992 Points ∼89% -11%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
6612 Points ∼65% -35%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
8843 Points ∼87% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8421 - 10147, n=10)
9643 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=711)
3376 Points ∼33% -67%
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6205 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5752 Points ∼93% -7%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5897 Points ∼95% -5%
Huawei P40
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5105 Points ∼82% -18%
Motorola Edge
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, Adreno 620, 6144
3742 Points ∼60% -40%
Samsung Galaxy S20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4764 Points ∼77% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (5264 - 6273, n=10)
5845 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6273, n=711)
1717 Points ∼28% -72%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)
69.54 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (50.9 - 69.5, n=10)
61.3 Points ∼88% -12%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)
55.572 Points ∼80% -20%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)
53.863 Points ∼77% -23%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
51.341 Points ∼74% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
50.878 Points ∼73% -27%
Motorola Edge (Chrome 81)
48.341 Points ∼70% -30%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=173)
40.1 Points ∼58% -42%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)
116.67 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (79.1 - 120, n=9)
110 Points ∼94% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
109.2 Points ∼94% -6%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)
103.24 Points ∼88% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)
93.499 Points ∼80% -20%
Motorola Edge (Chrome 81)
87.81 Points ∼75% -25%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
79.083 Points ∼68% -32%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=602)
46.3 Points ∼40% -60%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)
67.3 runs/min ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (50.8 - 74.5, n=10)
65.4 runs/min ∼97% -3%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)
63 runs/min ∼94% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
56.2 runs/min ∼84% -16%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chome 80)
50.8 runs/min ∼75% -25%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
50.8 runs/min ∼75% -25%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=157)
42.9 runs/min ∼64% -36%
Motorola Edge (Chome 81)
26.8 runs/min ∼40% -60%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
118 Points ∼100% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (99 - 118, n=10)
103 Points ∼87% +1%
realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)
102 Points ∼86%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
99 Points ∼84% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)
97 Points ∼82% -5%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)
95 Points ∼81% -7%
Motorola Edge (Chrome 81)
72 Points ∼61% -29%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=238)
69.7 Points ∼59% -32%
Octane V2 - Total Score
realme X50 Pro
23768 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
22016 Points ∼93% -7%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)
21348 Points ∼90% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (15745 - 24369, n=10)
21331 Points ∼90% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)
18162 Points ∼76% -24%
Motorola Edge (Chrome 81)
17700 Points ∼74% -26%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
15745 Points ∼66% -34%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=769)
7696 Points ∼32% -68%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1914 - 59466, n=795)
9886 ms * ∼100% -394%
Motorola Edge (Chrome 81)
2753.6 ms * ∼28% -38%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
2538.1 ms * ∼26% -27%
Samsung Galaxy S20 (Chrome 80)
2511.2 ms * ∼25% -26%
Huawei P40 (Huawei Browser 10.1)
2287 ms * ∼23% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
2103.5 ms * ∼21% -5%
realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)
1999.7 ms * ∼20%
realme X50 Pro
0 ms * ∼0% +100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (2000 - 2538, n=11)
1956 ms * ∼20% +2%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

realme X50 ProXiaomi Mi 10OnePlus 8Huawei P40Motorola EdgeSamsung Galaxy S20Average 256 GB UFS 3.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-12%
-7%
-30%
-41%
-11%
-20%
-82%
Random Write 4KB
251.98
215.95
-14%
203.85
-19%
197
-22%
145.2
-42%
228.1
-9%
180 (24.8 - 272, n=17)
-29%
33.2 (0.14 - 319, n=858)
-87%
Random Read 4KB
229.38
207.04
-10%
215
-6%
189.4
-17%
150.5
-34%
205.3
-10%
205 (169 - 265, n=17)
-11%
57.2 (1.59 - 324, n=858)
-75%
Sequential Write 256KB
756.21
679.51
-10%
747.87
-1%
212.9
-72%
451.7
-40%
669.9
-11%
532 (387 - 756, n=17)
-30%
122 (2.99 - 911, n=858)
-84%
Sequential Read 256KB
1756.1
1498.15
-15%
1706.7
-3%
1591.6
-9%
940.9
-46%
1541.7
-12%
1592 (1398 - 1789, n=17)
-9%
330 (12.1 - 1802, n=858)
-81%
PUBG mobile
0102030405060Tooltip
; Balanced: Ø59.8 (53-60)
; HD: Ø59.8 (57-60)
Asphalt 9 Legends
010203040Tooltip
: Ø29.5 (17-31)
 31 °C30.8 °C29 °C 
 31.5 °C31 °C28.9 °C 
 30.8 °C31.8 °C29 °C 
Maximum: 31.8 °C
Moyenne: 30.4 °C
27.9 °C28.9 °C29.3 °C
27.5 °C28.5 °C29.9 °C
27.5 °C29.1 °C29.9 °C
Maximum: 29.9 °C
Moyenne: 28.7 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  23.2 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.4 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 29.9 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.539.22529.426.93122.826.24025.325.85030.236.46323.324.48021.924.5100192212519.632.41601946.120016.146.825018.954.631516.659.540014.361.5500156563015.269.480014.371.2100014.372.1125014.273.1160014.874.9200014.875.1250014.475.6315014.377.8400014.680.7500014.779.4630014.974800014.970.51000014.668.31250014.855.61600015.448.3SPL26.887.7N0.969.3median 14.8median 69.4Delta1.41132.828.826.228.123.32521.925.52831.119.924.419.122.519.926.116.531.619.644.517.544.317.55113.956.713.961.415.865.215.265.61466.3146713.970.313.473.113.874.514.374.91473.414.572.714.670.914.569.414.768.415.165.41561.914.849.326.583.50.854.8median 14.6median 65.619.9hearing rangehide median Pink Noiserealme X50 ProXiaomi Mi 10
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
realme X50 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Mi 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.03 / 0.49 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 1 / 1.77 / 1.86 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 4.23 / 9.13 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
realme X50 Pro
4200 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10
4780 mAh
OnePlus 8
4300 mAh
Huawei P40
3800 mAh
Motorola Edge
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S20
4000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
19%
-2%
1%
4%
-4%
-24%
8%
Idle Minimum *
1
0.53
47%
0.9
10%
1
-0%
1
-0%
0.9
10%
1.251 (0.53 - 2.2, n=10)
-25%
0.887 (0.2 - 3.4, n=866)
11%
Idle Average *
1.77
1.46
18%
2.3
-30%
1.9
-7%
1.4
21%
1.5
15%
2.25 (1.19 - 3.43, n=10)
-27%
1.754 (0.6 - 6.2, n=865)
1%
Idle Maximum *
1.86
1.52
18%
2.33
-25%
2.4
-29%
2
-8%
2
-8%
2.55 (1.23 - 4, n=10)
-37%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=866)
-10%
Load Average *
4.23
3.83
9%
3.5
17%
3.5
17%
4.8
-13%
4.8
-13%
5.28 (3.5 - 7.4, n=10)
-25%
4.09 (0.8 - 10.8, n=860)
3%
Load Maximum *
9.13
8.89
3%
7.68
16%
6.9
24%
7.3
20%
11.5
-26%
9.82 (7.68 - 12.3, n=10)
-8%
6.04 (1.2 - 14.2, n=860)
34%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
Au repos (module WiFi éteint, luminosité au minimum)
25h 07min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12h 55min
En lecture de Big Buck Bunny encodé en H.264 1080p
17h 9min
Fortement sollicité (luminosité au maximum)
3h 14min
realme X50 Pro
4200 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10
4780 mAh
OnePlus 8
4300 mAh
Huawei P40
3800 mAh
Motorola Edge
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S20
4000 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie
7%
5%
16%
31%
14%
Reader / Idle
1507
1789
19%
1374
-9%
2063
37%
2515
67%
2105
40%
H.264
1029
1126
9%
1096
7%
1052
2%
1197
16%
809
-21%
WiFi v1.3
775
662
-15%
1045
35%
806
4%
888
15%
726
-6%
Load
194
226
16%
168
-13%
236
22%
240
24%
279
44%

Points positifs

+ écran OLED
+ 90 Hz
+ stockage
+ autonomie
+ performances
+ 5G
+ chargeur 65 W

Points négatifs

- USB 2.0
- absence de lecteur de carte / de prise jack
- absence de double SIM
- taille du poinçon d'appareil photo
- absence de charge sans fil
- absence de certification IP
- stabilité des performances
- qualité de la lentille ultra-grand-angle
- position du lecteur d'empreintes digitales
- absence de LED de statut / d'écran Always-on

Verdict

En test : le Realme X50 Pro. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par Realme Allemagne.
En test : le Realme X50 Pro. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par Realme Allemagne.

Le X50 PRo est un smartphone visuellement très réussi, avec un dos mat multi couche particulièrement beau. Mais cette apparence est gâchée par le très gros poinçon du module d'appareil photo. A cause de la qualité des selfies ultra-grand-angle, l'utilité de la deuxième lentille à l'avant est en question, un trou plus discret ayant été plus élégant. Tout comme l'optique grand-angle à l'avant, l'ultra-grand-angle à l'arrière est décevant, et ne peut atteindre la qualité des concurrents. Il en va de même pour la lentille de zoom, et dans une moindre mesure pour l'appareil photo principal. Pour 750 €, les clients sont en mesure d'en attendre plus des appareils photo.

Alors que le Realme X50 Pro possède de nombreuses qualités, son prix conseillé du fabricant chinois est trop élevé, à cause de ce que propose la concurrence.

Avec de bons haut-parleurs stéréos, un bel écran 90 Hz, et des composants puissants, qui ont néanmoins des difficultés à garder des performances stables à l'inverse de ce qui se passe avec les autres alternatives haut de gammes, le X50 Pro reste un bon smartphone.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

realme X50 Pro - 06/12/2020 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Châssis
86%
Clavier
67 / 75 → 89%
Dispositif de pointage
93%
Connectivité
53 / 70 → 75%
Poids
88%
Autonomie
90%
Écran
87%
Performances en jeu
61 / 64 → 96%
Performances dans les applications
84 / 86 → 97%
Chauffe
94%
Nuisance sonore
100%
Audio
76 / 90 → 85%
Appareil photo
67%
Moyenne
80%
86%
Smartphone - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Test du Realme X50 Pro : rapport performances / prix au top ?
Marcus Herbrich, 2020-07-23 (Update: 2020-07-23)