Notebookcheck

Test de l'Alcatel 3 (2019) : un smartphone bon marché fluide

Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Stefanie Voigt (traduit par Prévots), 09/20/2019

Etonnamment bon. L’Alcatel 3 (2019) nous a immédiatement impressionnés, grâce à sa fluidité. Lisez ce rapport de test pour voir comment cet appareil à 180 € parvient à être aussi performant.

Alcatel 3 2019 (3 Gamme)
Processeur
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
Carte graphique
Qualcomm Adreno 505
Mémoire
3072 Mo 
Écran
5.9 pouces 19.5:9, 1560 x 720 pixel 291 PPP, capacitif, TCL-Display, IPS, brillant: oui
Disque dur
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 Go 
, 24 Go libres
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, Connectique audio: jack 3,5 mm, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: micro SD (FAT, FAT32, avec 128 Go), 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: accéléromètre, boussole, capteur de proximité, micro USB
Réseau
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM : 850, 900, 1 800, 1 900. 3G/UMTS: B1, B2, B5, B8. 4G/LTE : bandes 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 7.99 x 151.1 x 69.7
Batterie
3500 mAh Lithium-Ion, Autonomie de la batterie en communication 2G (selon les données du fabricant): 28 h, Autonomie de la batterie en communication 3G (selon les données du fabricant): 21 h, Autonomie de la batterie en veille 2G (selon les données du fabricant): 900 h, Autonomie de la batterie en veille 3G (selon les données du fabricant): 950 h
Système d'exploitation
Android 9.0 Pie
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 13 MPix (f/2,0, 1 / 3", 1,12μm) + 5 MP (f/2,4, 1 / 5", 1,12 μm)
Appareil photo secondaire: 8 MPix f/2,0, 1 / 4", 1,12 μm
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: stéréo, Clavier: virtuel, Micro SD jusqu'à 128 Go. Systèmes de fichier FAT et FAT32., 24 Mois Garantie, adaptateur secteur USB, câble micro USB, écouteurs, fanless
Poids
145 g, Alimentation: 60 g
Prix
180 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Alcatel 3 2019
Alcatel 3 2019
Alcatel 3 2019
Alcatel 3 2019
Alcatel 3 2019
Alcatel 3 2019
Alcatel 3 2019

Comparaison des tailles

153.5 mm 71.9 mm 8.5 mm 173.8 g153 mm 71.9 mm 8.3 mm 145 g151.1 mm 69.7 mm 7.99 mm 145 g148.95 mm 71.3 mm 8.39 mm 161 g147.4 mm 69.7 mm 8.4 mm 141 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=434)
226 MBit/s ∼100% +397%
LG K40
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash
221 (min: 107, max: 246) MBit/s ∼98% +386%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Adreno 610, 665, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
158 (min: 18, max: 227) MBit/s ∼70% +247%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Mali-G71 MP2, 7884B, 32 GB eMMC Flash
60 (min: 47, max: 67) MBit/s ∼27% +32%
Nokia 4.2
Adreno 505, 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash
52.6 (min: 35, max: 52) MBit/s ∼23% +16%
Alcatel 3 2019
Adreno 505, 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash
45.5 (min: 43, max: 48) MBit/s ∼20%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=434)
216 MBit/s ∼100% +420%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Adreno 610, 665, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
172 (min: 2, max: 282) MBit/s ∼80% +314%
Alcatel 3 2019
Adreno 505, 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash
41.5 (min: 38, max: 46) MBit/s ∼19%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Mali-G71 MP2, 7884B, 32 GB eMMC Flash
39.7 (min: 23, max: 50) MBit/s ∼18% -4%
LG K40
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash
39.6 (min: 10, max: 54) MBit/s ∼18% -5%
Nokia 4.2
Adreno 505, 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash
35.2 (min: 24, max: 40) MBit/s ∼16% -15%
GPS Alcatel 3 : vue générale.
GPS Alcatel 3 : vue générale.
GPS Alcatel 3 : autour d'un lac.
GPS Alcatel 3 : autour d'un lac.
GPS Alcatel 3 : boucle.
GPS Alcatel 3 : boucle.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 : vue générale.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 : vue générale.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 : autour d'un lac.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 : autour d'un lac.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 : boucle.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 : boucle.

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Cliquer pour charger les images
Alcatel 3 (2019) - Mire de test.
Alcatel 3 (2019) - Mire de test.
Alcatel 3 (2019) - Détail de la mire de test.
Alcatel 3 (2019) - Mire de test à 1 lux.
607
cd/m²
626
cd/m²
595
cd/m²
601
cd/m²
648
cd/m²
594
cd/m²
596
cd/m²
626
cd/m²
575
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
TCL-Display
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 648 cd/m² Moyenne: 607.6 cd/m² Minimum: 4.88 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 89 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 648 cd/m²
Contraste: 2492:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.8 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 9.3 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
98.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.94
Alcatel 3 2019
IPS, 1560x720, 5.9
Nokia 4.2
IPS, 1520x720, 5.71
Xiaomi Mi A3
AMOLED, 1560x720, 6.09
LG K40
IPS, 1440x720, 5.7
Samsung Galaxy A20e
IPS, 1560x720, 5.8
Screen
-0%
-2%
-8%
-13%
Brightness middle
648
445
-31%
348
-46%
475
-27%
475
-27%
Brightness
608
424
-30%
355
-42%
467
-23%
473
-22%
Brightness Distribution
89
91
2%
91
2%
90
1%
93
4%
Black Level *
0.26
0.26
-0%
0.32
-23%
0.35
-35%
Contrast
2492
1712
-31%
1484
-40%
1357
-46%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
8.8
5.9
33%
5.86
33%
5.95
32%
6.8
23%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
13
9.3
28%
15.6
-20%
12.62
3%
13.4
-3%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
9.3
6.8
27%
3.6
61%
7.9
15%
8.7
6%
Gamma
2.94 75%
2.2 100%
2.232 99%
2.331 94%
2.33 94%
CCT
9314 70%
8443 77%
7051 92%
8202 79%
9385 69%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) décelé 943.4 Hz ≤ 100 Niveau de luminosité

Le rétroéclairage de l'écran scintille à la fréquence de 943.4 Hz (certainement du fait de l'utilisation d'une MDI - Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) à un niveau de luminosité inférieur ou égal à 100 % . Aucun scintillement ne devrait être perceptible au-dessus de cette valeur.

La fréquence de rafraîchissement de 943.4 Hz est élevée, la grande majorité des utilisateurs ne devrait pas percevoir de scintillements et être sujette à une fatigue oculaire accrue.

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9361 (minimum : 43 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
13.6 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 4.4 ms hausse
↘ 9.2 ms chute
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (24.9 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
27.6 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 10.4 ms hausse
↘ 17.2 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences relativement élevées, insuffisant pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (39.7 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3199 Points ∼62%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3183 Points ∼62% -1%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
5144 Points ∼100% +61%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2638 Points ∼51% -18%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
3271 Points ∼64% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (3183 - 3199, n=2)
3191 Points ∼62% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=320)
4684 Points ∼91% +46%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3240 Points ∼57%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3267 Points ∼58% +1%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
5663 Points ∼100% +75%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
3375 Points ∼60% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
3714 Points ∼66% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (3068 - 3267, n=3)
3192 Points ∼56% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 11598, n=379)
4700 Points ∼83% +45%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
903 Points ∼59%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
891 Points ∼58% -1%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1536 Points ∼100% +70%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
758 Points ∼49% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1212 Points ∼79% +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (863 - 903, n=3)
886 Points ∼58% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=379)
1419 Points ∼92% +57%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
4791 Points ∼75%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
4623 Points ∼72% -4%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6396 Points ∼100% +34%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
3805 Points ∼59% -21%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
5305 Points ∼83% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (4594 - 4791, n=3)
4669 Points ∼73% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11440, n=371)
5249 Points ∼82% +10%
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
6203 Points ∼78%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
6228 Points ∼78% 0%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7984 Points ∼100% +29%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4404 Points ∼55% -29%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
6902 Points ∼86% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (5880 - 6228, n=3)
6104 Points ∼76% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 14439, n=542)
5678 Points ∼71% -8%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
2151 Points ∼80%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
2172 Points ∼81% +1%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2300 Points ∼85% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
2018 Points ∼75% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (2134 - 2172, n=3)
2152 Points ∼80% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 15735, n=57)
2697 Points ∼100% +25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
412 Points ∼15%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
401 Points ∼14% -3%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
908 Points ∼33% +120%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
498 Points ∼18% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (401 - 412, n=3)
407 Points ∼15% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 14536, n=57)
2792 Points ∼100% +578%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
502 Points ∼20%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
490 Points ∼19% -2%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1049 Points ∼41% +109%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
598 Points ∼24% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (490 - 502, n=3)
496 Points ∼20% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 14786, n=57)
2534 Points ∼100% +405%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1657 Points ∼69%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1500 Points ∼63% -9%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2387 Points ∼100% +44%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
912 Points ∼38% -45%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1628 Points ∼68% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (1500 - 1657, n=3)
1584 Points ∼66% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4635, n=379)
1957 Points ∼82% +18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
419 Points ∼24%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
413 Points ∼23% -1%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
987 Points ∼56% +136%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
431 Points ∼24% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
440 Points ∼25% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (413 - 419, n=3)
417 Points ∼24% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 8374, n=379)
1761 Points ∼100% +320%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
502 Points ∼31%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
492 Points ∼30% -2%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1135 Points ∼69% +126%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
488 Points ∼30% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
525 Points ∼32% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (492 - 502, n=3)
498 Points ∼30% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 6875, n=380)
1634 Points ∼100% +225%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1590 Points ∼68%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1516 Points ∼65% -5%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2343 Points ∼100% +47%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
912 Points ∼39% -43%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1624 Points ∼69% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (1516 - 1594, n=3)
1567 Points ∼67% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=408)
1866 Points ∼80% +17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
732 Points ∼31%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
712 Points ∼30% -3%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1674 Points ∼72% +129%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
695 Points ∼30% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
659 Points ∼28% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (712 - 732, n=3)
725 Points ∼31% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=408)
2340 Points ∼100% +220%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
832 Points ∼42%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
807 Points ∼41% -3%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1787 Points ∼91% +115%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
734 Points ∼37% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
759 Points ∼39% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (807 - 832, n=3)
823 Points ∼42% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=408)
1966 Points ∼100% +136%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1651 Points ∼67%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1575 Points ∼64% -5%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2477 Points ∼100% +50%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
881 Points ∼36% -47%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1630 Points ∼66% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (1575 - 1651, n=3)
1612 Points ∼65% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4492, n=459)
1864 Points ∼75% +13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
370 Points ∼25%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
366 Points ∼25% -1%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
931 Points ∼64% +152%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
303 Points ∼21% -18%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
443 Points ∼31% +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (366 - 370, n=3)
369 Points ∼25% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 7150, n=459)
1452 Points ∼100% +292%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
447 Points ∼32%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
441 Points ∼32% -1%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1081 Points ∼77% +142%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
355 Points ∼25% -21%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
526 Points ∼38% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (441 - 447, n=3)
445 Points ∼32% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 6319, n=460)
1398 Points ∼100% +213%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1596 Points ∼65%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1568 Points ∼63% -2%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2471 Points ∼100% +55%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
912 Points ∼37% -43%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1646 Points ∼67% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (1568 - 1596, n=3)
1581 Points ∼64% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 4454, n=500)
1727 Points ∼70% +8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
724 Points ∼38%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
704 Points ∼37% -3%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1651 Points ∼87% +128%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
512 Points ∼27% -29%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
637 Points ∼34% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (704 - 724, n=3)
717 Points ∼38% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11302, n=499)
1891 Points ∼100% +161%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
824 Points ∼46%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
802 Points ∼45% -3%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1782 Points ∼100% +116%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
567 Points ∼32% -31%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
737 Points ∼41% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (802 - 824, n=3)
816 Points ∼46% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8136, n=502)
1636 Points ∼92% +99%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
12096 Points ∼62%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
12390 Points ∼63% +2%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
19552 Points ∼100% +62%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
11443 Points ∼59% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
12075 Points ∼62% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (12096 - 12673, n=3)
12386 Points ∼63% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=661)
14062 Points ∼72% +16%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
13615 Points ∼54%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
13440 Points ∼53% -1%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
25219 Points ∼100% +85%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
10531 Points ∼42% -23%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
11427 Points ∼45% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (13440 - 13615, n=3)
13522 Points ∼54% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=659)
21674 Points ∼86% +59%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
13245 Points ∼56%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
13192 Points ∼56% 0%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
23693 Points ∼100% +79%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
10721 Points ∼45% -19%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
11565 Points ∼49% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (13192 - 13315, n=3)
13251 Points ∼56% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=659)
17596 Points ∼74% +33%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
23 fps ∼61%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
23 fps ∼61% 0%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
36 fps ∼96% +57%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
19 fps ∼51% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
20 fps ∼53% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (23 - 23, n=3)
23 fps ∼61% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=682)
37.5 fps ∼100% +63%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
34 fps ∼65%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
34 fps ∼65% 0%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
52 fps ∼100% +53%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
26 fps ∼50% -24%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
31 fps ∼60% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (34 - 35, n=3)
34.3 fps ∼66% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=691)
27.8 fps ∼53% -18%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
9.9 fps ∼46%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
9.8 fps ∼45% -1%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
20 fps ∼93% +102%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
9.7 fps ∼45% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
11 fps ∼51% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (9.8 - 19, n=3)
12.9 fps ∼60% +30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=588)
21.6 fps ∼100% +118%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
18 fps ∼53%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
18 fps ∼53% 0%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
34 fps ∼100% +89%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
16 fps ∼47% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
20 fps ∼59% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (9.9 - 18, n=3)
15.3 fps ∼45% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=597)
19.2 fps ∼56% +7%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
6.4 fps ∼36%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
6.4 fps ∼36% 0%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼73% +103%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6 fps ∼34% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
6.5 fps ∼37% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (6.4 - 6.4, n=3)
6.4 fps ∼36% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=454)
17.7 fps ∼100% +177%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
13 fps ∼50%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
13 fps ∼50% 0%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
26 fps ∼100% +100%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
11 fps ∼42% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
14 fps ∼54% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (13 - 14, n=3)
13.3 fps ∼51% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=456)
16.6 fps ∼64% +28%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3.9 fps ∼38%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3.9 fps ∼38% 0%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
9.1 fps ∼89% +133%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4.3 fps ∼42% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
4.8 fps ∼47% +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (3.9 - 4.1, n=3)
3.97 fps ∼39% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=172)
10.2 fps ∼100% +162%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1.2 fps ∼17%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1.2 fps ∼17% 0%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼40% +133%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1.3 fps ∼18% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1.4 fps ∼20% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (1.2 - 1.2, n=3)
1.2 fps ∼17% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 33, n=171)
7.05 fps ∼100% +488%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
6.4 fps ∼43%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
6.6 fps ∼44% +3%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
15 fps ∼100% +134%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6.8 fps ∼45% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
7.8 fps ∼52% +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (6.4 - 6.6, n=2)
6.5 fps ∼43% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=176)
14.9 fps ∼99% +133%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3.7 fps ∼22%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3.6 fps ∼22% -3%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.4 fps ∼51% +127%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
3.7 fps ∼22% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
4 fps ∼24% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (3.6 - 3.7, n=3)
3.67 fps ∼22% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 87, n=176)
16.6 fps ∼100% +349%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3.6 fps ∼30%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
3.5 fps ∼29% -3%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.1 fps ∼59% +97%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2.8 fps ∼23% -22%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
4.2 fps ∼35% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (3.5 - 3.6, n=3)
3.53 fps ∼29% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=379)
12.1 fps ∼100% +236%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
7 fps ∼54%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
7 fps ∼54% 0%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼100% +86%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4 fps ∼31% -43%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
8.6 fps ∼66% +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (7 - 7.3, n=3)
7.1 fps ∼55% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=383)
10.8 fps ∼83% +54%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
79792 Points ∼56%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
77652 Points ∼55% -3%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
140633 Points ∼99% +76%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
71347 Points ∼50% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
95464 Points ∼67% +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (75175 - 79792, n=3)
77540 Points ∼55% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (17073 - 462516, n=290)
141701 Points ∼100% +78%
BaseMark OS II
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
838 Points ∼60%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
834 Points ∼60% 0%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1400 Points ∼100% +67%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
776 Points ∼55% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1106 Points ∼79% +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (834 - 1083, n=3)
918 Points ∼66% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=626)
754 Points ∼54% -10%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1009 Points ∼50%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1000 Points ∼49% -1%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1886 Points ∼93% +87%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
767 Points ∼38% -24%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
893 Points ∼44% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (1000 - 1009, n=3)
1005 Points ∼49% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=626)
2035 Points ∼100% +102%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1335 Points ∼42%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1316 Points ∼41% -1%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
3174 Points ∼100% +138%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
690 Points ∼22% -48%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
2008 Points ∼63% +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (655 - 1335, n=3)
1102 Points ∼35% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=626)
1503 Points ∼47% +13%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
2624 Points ∼52%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
2687 Points ∼53% +2%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
5089 Points ∼100% +94%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2195 Points ∼43% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
3372 Points ∼66% +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (2238 - 2687, n=3)
2516 Points ∼49% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=626)
2951 Points ∼58% +12%
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1312 Points ∼51%
Nokia 4.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072
1310 Points ∼51% 0%
Xiaomi Mi A3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2556 Points ∼100% +95%
LG K40
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
975 Points ∼38% -26%
Samsung Galaxy A20e
Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072
1608 Points ∼63% +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
  (1124 - 1312, n=3)
1249 Points ∼49% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=626)
1478 Points ∼58% +13%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
51.046 Points ∼100% +89%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=525)
41.4 Points ∼81% +53%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)
39.076 Points ∼77% +44%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
27.086 Points ∼53% 0%
Alcatel 3 2019 (Chrome 72)
27.076 Points ∼53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (26.1 - 27.1, n=3)
26.8 Points ∼53% -1%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=157)
66.9 Points ∼100% +81%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
58 Points ∼87% +57%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)
48 Points ∼72% +30%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
38 Points ∼57% +3%
Alcatel 3 2019 (Chrome 72)
37 Points ∼55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (34 - 38, n=3)
36.3 Points ∼54% -2%
LG K40 (Chrome 74)
29 Points ∼43% -22%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
9260 Points ∼100% +87%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)
7470 Points ∼81% +51%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=684)
6701 Points ∼72% +35%
Alcatel 3 2019 (Chrome 72)
4958 Points ∼54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (4701 - 4958, n=3)
4823 Points ∼52% -3%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
4810 Points ∼52% -3%
LG K40 (Chrome 74)
4197 Points ∼45% -15%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
LG K40 (Chrome 74)
11955 ms * ∼100% -22%
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=709)
10602 ms * ∼89% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (9768 - 10143, n=3)
9914 ms * ∼83% -1%
Alcatel 3 2019 (Chrome 72)
9832.4 ms * ∼82%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)
9768.3 ms * ∼82% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)
5546.4 ms * ∼46% +44%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)
4583.8 ms * ∼38% +53%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Alcatel 3 2019Nokia 4.2Xiaomi Mi A3LG K40Samsung Galaxy A20eAverage 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-43%
135%
-16%
-3%
-16%
-10%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
64.93 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
65.87 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
50.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-23%
57.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-12%
64.28 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
50.2 (3.4 - 87.1, n=140)
-23%
49.1 (1.7 - 87.1, n=417)
-24%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
86.62 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
86.74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
67.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-22%
77.59 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-10%
79.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-9%
68.9 (8.2 - 96.5, n=140)
-20%
67.3 (8.1 - 96.5, n=417)
-22%
Random Write 4KB
16.05
4.31
-73%
117.4
631%
10
-38%
13.18
-18%
18.3 (0.75 - 77.3, n=181)
14%
21.5 (0.14 - 250, n=734)
34%
Random Read 4KB
84.93
17.51
-79%
126.9
49%
52.6
-38%
79.76
-6%
38.9 (3.59 - 117, n=181)
-54%
46.5 (1.59 - 196, n=734)
-45%
Sequential Write 256KB
87.21
18.17
-79%
184
111%
100.5
15%
103.57
19%
94.6 (14.8 - 189, n=181)
8%
95.4 (2.99 - 590, n=734)
9%
Sequential Read 256KB
305.8
220.39
-28%
502.2
64%
261.7
-14%
300.36
-2%
236 (25.8 - 452, n=181)
-23%
269 (12.1 - 1504, n=734)
-12%
 31.9 °C31.8 °C31.2 °C 
 31.2 °C31.5 °C31.6 °C 
 30.8 °C30.9 °C30.8 °C 
Maximum: 31.9 °C
Moyenne: 31.3 °C
28.9 °C29.2 °C31.5 °C
29 °C29.2 °C31.4 °C
28.3 °C28.8 °C29.9 °C
Maximum: 31.5 °C
Moyenne: 29.6 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  26.6 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.3 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.9 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.239.82536.433.9312725.94029.328.45038.241.86328.827.48027.524.31002321.812521.222.316018.724.520019.627.825017.933.631517.738.440015.446.250016.653.463015.157.380015.961.3100013.965125014.467.3160014.966.9200014.566.1250014.867.5315014.369.9400014.371.6500014.667.8630014.865.1800015.365.81000014.865.8125001567.11600015.156.4SPL27.179.1N0.940.9median 15.1median 65Delta1.413.136.742.733.637.834.335.133.830.63933.534.831.43130.530.232.123.228.122.835.322.636.919.844.220.150.316.951.916.856.915.259.415.864.915.869.314.569.31570.914.17015.369.814.971.614.969.614.770.114.769.614.970.814.873.215.361.615.45227.881.6149.8median 15.3median 64.92.110.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAlcatel 3 2019Samsung Galaxy A20e
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Alcatel 3 2019 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 37% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy A20e audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.02 / 0.15 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 0.63 / 1.66 / 1.73 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 3.17 / 4.75 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Alcatel 3 2019
3500 mAh
Nokia 4.2
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi A3
4030 mAh
LG K40
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A20e
3000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-8%
-46%
-5%
7%
-9%
-22%
Idle Minimum *
0.63
0.74
-17%
0.8
-27%
0.68
-8%
0.66
-5%
0.723 (0.63 - 0.8, n=3)
-15%
0.877 (0.2 - 3.4, n=769)
-39%
Idle Average *
1.66
1.9
-14%
2
-20%
1.53
8%
1.63
2%
1.72 (1.6 - 1.9, n=3)
-4%
1.734 (0.6 - 6.2, n=768)
-4%
Idle Maximum *
1.73
2.21
-28%
3.3
-91%
1.95
-13%
1.67
3%
2.05 (1.73 - 2.21, n=3)
-18%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=769)
-17%
Load Average *
3.17
3.04
4%
4.1
-29%
3.5
-10%
2.77
13%
3.37 (3.04 - 3.9, n=3)
-6%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=763)
-28%
Load Maximum *
4.75
4.15
13%
7.7
-62%
4.9
-3%
3.66
23%
4.77 (4.15 - 5.4, n=3)
-0%
5.9 (1.2 - 14.2, n=763)
-24%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
15h 23min
Alcatel 3 2019
3500 mAh
Nokia 4.2
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi A3
4030 mAh
LG K40
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A20e
3000 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie
WiFi v1.3
923
696
-25%
985
7%
745
-19%
715
-23%

Points positifs

+ performances
+ autonomie
+ lumineux et contrasté

Points négatifs

- port micro USB 2.0
- appareils photo
- stockage
En test : l'Alcatel 3 (2019). Modèle de test aimablement fourni par TCL Allemagne.
En test : l'Alcatel 3 (2019). Modèle de test aimablement fourni par TCL Allemagne.

L’Alcatel 3 (2019) est un smartphone costaud à petit prix, qui excelle dans les tâches classiques du quotidien. Le système est toujours resté fluide tout au long de nos tests, les applis se chargeant rapidement. TCL a équipé l’appareil d’un écran lumineux et bien contrasté, qui nous a également impressionnés. De plus, l’Alcatel 3 (2019) possède une excellente autonomie, et son GPS devrait rester toujours assez précis.

L’Alcatel 3 2019 est un smartphone bon marché et fournit des performances fluides. Ses capteurs photo devraient cependant faire mieux, mais il faut avouer que l’appareil possède une bonne autonomie et un écran bien contrasté.

L’appareil possède ainsi ses défauts. Il faudra se contenter du stockage limité, d’autant qu’il n’est pas possible de stocker des applis ou leur contenu sur un stockage amovible. De plus, les capteurs photo ne suffiront que pour des photos occasionnelles. Mais vu le prix du smartphone, nous avons là des défauts acceptables. L’appareil conviendra à tous ceux qui n’en attendent pas trop de leur smartphone.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Alcatel 3 2019 - 09/27/2019 v7
Mike Wobker

Châssis
83%
Clavier
65 / 75 → 87%
Dispositif de pointage
92%
Connectivité
39 / 70 → 55%
Poids
93%
Autonomie
91%
Écran
79%
Performances en jeu
6 / 64 → 10%
Performances dans les applications
43 / 86 → 50%
Chauffe
94%
Nuisance sonore
100%
Audio
70 / 90 → 78%
Appareil photo
54%
Moyenne
70%
76%
Smartphone - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Test de l'Alcatel 3 (2019) : un smartphone bon marché fluide
Mike Wobker, 2019-09-20 (Update: 2019-09-20)