Test de l'Alcatel 3 (2019) : un smartphone bon marché fluide

Name: Alcatel 3 2019
Brand: Alcatel

Etonnamment bon. L’Alcatel 3 (2019) nous a immédiatement impressionnés, grâce à sa fluidité. Lisez ce rapport de test pour voir comment cet appareil à 180 € parvient à être aussi performant.

Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (traduit par Prévots), 09/20/2019

Android Touchscreen Smartphone

Exemplaire de test fourni par TCL Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Alcatel 3 2019 (3 Gamme)

Processeur

Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A53

Carte graphique

Qualcomm Adreno 505

Mémoire

3072 Mo

Écran

5.9 pouces 19.5:9, 1560 x 720 pixel 291 PPP, capacitif, TCL-Display, IPS, brillant: oui

Disque dur

32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 Go

, 24 Go libres

Connexions

1 USB 2.0, Connectique audio: jack 3,5 mm, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: micro SD (FAT, FAT32, avec 128 Go), 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: accéléromètre, boussole, capteur de proximité, micro USB

Réseau

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM : 850, 900, 1 800, 1 900. 3G/UMTS: B1, B2, B5, B8. 4G/LTE : bandes 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Taille

Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 7.99 x 151.1 x 69.7

Batterie

3500 mAh Lithium-Ion, Autonomie de la batterie en communication 2G (selon les données du fabricant): 28 h, Autonomie de la batterie en communication 3G (selon les données du fabricant): 21 h, Autonomie de la batterie en veille 2G (selon les données du fabricant): 900 h, Autonomie de la batterie en veille 3G (selon les données du fabricant): 950 h

Système d'exploitation

Android 9.0 Pie

Appareil photo

Appareil photo primaire: 13 MPix (f/2,0, 1 / 3", 1,12μm) + 5 MP (f/2,4, 1 / 5", 1,12 μm)
Appareil photo secondaire: 8 MPix f/2,0, 1 / 4", 1,12 μm

Fonctionnalités additionnelles

Haut-parleurs: stéréo, Clavier: virtuel, Micro SD jusqu'à 128 Go. Systèmes de fichier FAT et FAT32., 24 Mois Garantie, adaptateur secteur USB, câble micro USB, écouteurs, fanless

Poids

145 g, Alimentation: 60 g

Prix

180 euros

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

voir toutes les spécifications

Comparaison des tailles

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone (5.9 - 1414, n=562)	267 MBit/s ∼100% +487%
LG K40 PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash	221 (min: 107, max: 246) MBit/s ∼83% +386%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	158 (min: 18, max: 227) MBit/s ∼59% +247%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7884B, 32 GB eMMC Flash	60 (min: 47, max: 67) MBit/s ∼22% +32%
Nokia 4.2 Adreno 505, SD 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash	52.6 (min: 35, max: 52) MBit/s ∼20% +16%
Alcatel 3 2019 Adreno 505, SD 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash	45.5 (min: 43, max: 48) MBit/s ∼17%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone (9.4 - 1599, n=562)	253 MBit/s ∼100% +510%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	172 (min: 2, max: 282) MBit/s ∼68% +314%
Alcatel 3 2019 Adreno 505, SD 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash	41.5 (min: 38, max: 46) MBit/s ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7884B, 32 GB eMMC Flash	39.7 (min: 23, max: 50) MBit/s ∼16% -4%
LG K40 PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22 MT6762, 32 GB eMMC Flash	39.6 (min: 10, max: 54) MBit/s ∼16% -5%
Nokia 4.2 Adreno 505, SD 439, 32 GB eMMC Flash	35.2 (min: 24, max: 40) MBit/s ∼14% -15%

; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø45.3 (43-48)

; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø41.6 (38-46)

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

Cliquer pour charger les images

Cliquer pour charger les images

Cliquer pour charger les images

Alcatel 3 (2019) - Mire de test à 1 lux.


607 cd/m²	626 cd/m²	595 cd/m²
601 cd/m²	648 cd/m²	594 cd/m²
596 cd/m²	626 cd/m²	575 cd/m²

Homogénéité de la luminosité

TCL-Display

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 648 cd/m² Moyenne: 607.6 cd/m² Minimum: 4.88 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 89 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 648 cd/m²
Contraste: 2492:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.8 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 9.3 | 0.64-98 Ø6
98.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.94

	Alcatel 3 2019 IPS, 1560x720, 5.9	Nokia 4.2 IPS, 1520x720, 5.71	Xiaomi Mi A3 AMOLED, 1560x720, 6.09	LG K40 IPS, 1440x720, 5.7	Samsung Galaxy A20e IPS, 1560x720, 5.8
Screen		-0%	-2%	-8%	-13%
Brightness middle	648	445 -31%	348 -46%	475 -27%	475 -27%
Brightness	608	424 -30%	355 -42%	467 -23%	473 -22%
Brightness Distribution	89	91 2%	91 2%	90 1%	93 4%
Black Level *	0.26	0.26 -0%		0.32 -23%	0.35 -35%
Contrast	2492	1712 -31%		1484 -40%	1357 -46%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	8.8	5.9 33%	5.86 33%	5.95 32%	6.8 23%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	13	9.3 28%	15.6 -20%	12.62 3%	13.4 -3%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	9.3	6.8 27%	3.6 61%	7.9 15%	8.7 6%
Gamma	2.94 ^75%	2.2 ^100%	2.232 ^99%	2.331 ^94%	2.33 ^94%
CCT	9314 ^70%	8443 ^77%	7051 ^92%	8202 ^79%	9385 ^69%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

ℹ

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) décelé

943.4 Hz

≤ 100 Niveau de luminosité

Le rétroéclairage de l'écran scintille à la fréquence de 943.4 Hz (certainement du fait de l'utilisation d'une MDI - Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) à un niveau de luminosité inférieur ou égal à 100 % . Aucun scintillement ne devrait être perceptible au-dessus de cette valeur.

La fréquence de rafraîchissement de 943.4 Hz est élevée, la grande majorité des utilisateurs ne devrait pas percevoir de scintillements et être sujette à une fatigue oculaire accrue.

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 17957 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 2500000) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

ℹ

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.

↔ Temps de réponse noir à blanc
13.6 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↗ 4.4 ms hausse
13.6 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↘ 9.2 ms chute
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (24.6 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
↔ Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
27.6 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↗ 10.4 ms hausse
27.6 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↘ 17.2 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences relativement élevées, insuffisant pour le jeu. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 18 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (39.1 ms) de tous les appareils testés.

Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	3199 Points ∼62%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	3183 Points ∼62% -1%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	5144 Points ∼100% +61%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	2638 Points ∼51% -18%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	3271 Points ∼64% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (2505 - 3199, n=3)	2962 Points ∼58% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (663 - 21070, n=351)	4852 Points ∼94% +52%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	3240 Points ∼57%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	3267 Points ∼58% +1%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	5663 Points ∼100% +75%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	3375 Points ∼60% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	3714 Points ∼66% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (2987 - 3267, n=4)	3141 Points ∼55% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 13589, n=413)	4955 Points ∼87% +53%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	903 Points ∼59%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	891 Points ∼58% -1%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1536 Points ∼100% +70%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	758 Points ∼49% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1212 Points ∼79% +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (863 - 903, n=4)	880 Points ∼57% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (390 - 4824, n=413)	1510 Points ∼98% +67%

PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	4791 Points ∼75%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	4623 Points ∼72% -4%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	6396 Points ∼100% +34%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	3805 Points ∼59% -21%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	5305 Points ∼83% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (4412 - 4791, n=6)	4632 Points ∼72% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 13202, n=490)	5834 Points ∼91% +22%
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	6203 Points ∼78%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	6228 Points ∼78% 0%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	7984 Points ∼100% +29%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	4404 Points ∼55% -29%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	6902 Points ∼86% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (5880 - 6228, n=6)	6095 Points ∼76% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1077 - 19711, n=648)	6373 Points ∼80% +3%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	2151 Points ∼82%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	2172 Points ∼82% +1%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2300 Points ∼87% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	2018 Points ∼77% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (2118 - 2172, n=6)	2139 Points ∼81% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1740 - 4057, n=149)	2636 Points ∼100% +23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	412 Points ∼14%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	401 Points ∼14% -3%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	908 Points ∼31% +120%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	498 Points ∼17% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (401 - 412, n=6)	407 Points ∼14% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (203 - 8783, n=149)	2916 Points ∼100% +608%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	502 Points ∼19%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	490 Points ∼19% -2%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1049 Points ∼40% +109%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	598 Points ∼23% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (490 - 502, n=6)	496 Points ∼19% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (253 - 6644, n=149)	2626 Points ∼100% +423%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1657 Points ∼69%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1500 Points ∼63% -9%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2387 Points ∼100% +44%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	912 Points ∼38% -45%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1628 Points ∼68% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (1500 - 1657, n=6)	1597 Points ∼67% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (573 - 5780, n=496)	2175 Points ∼91% +31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	419 Points ∼20%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	413 Points ∼20% -1%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	987 Points ∼48% +136%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	431 Points ∼21% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	440 Points ∼21% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (413 - 432, n=6)	420 Points ∼20% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (75 - 9567, n=496)	2075 Points ∼100% +395%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	502 Points ∼26%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	492 Points ∼26% -2%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1135 Points ∼59% +126%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	488 Points ∼25% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	525 Points ∼27% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (492 - 505, n=6)	500 Points ∼26% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (93 - 8204, n=497)	1926 Points ∼100% +284%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1590 Points ∼68%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1516 Points ∼65% -5%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2343 Points ∼100% +47%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	912 Points ∼39% -43%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1624 Points ∼69% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (1516 - 1618, n=6)	1588 Points ∼68% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 5765, n=526)	2085 Points ∼89% +31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	732 Points ∼27%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	712 Points ∼26% -3%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1674 Points ∼61% +129%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	695 Points ∼25% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	659 Points ∼24% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (712 - 735, n=6)	727 Points ∼26% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (70 - 20154, n=526)	2762 Points ∼100% +277%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	832 Points ∼36%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	807 Points ∼35% -3%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1787 Points ∼77% +115%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	734 Points ∼32% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	759 Points ∼33% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (807 - 835, n=6)	826 Points ∼36% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (88 - 10699, n=526)	2321 Points ∼100% +179%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1651 Points ∼67%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1575 Points ∼64% -5%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2477 Points ∼100% +50%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	881 Points ∼36% -47%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1630 Points ∼66% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (1575 - 1657, n=6)	1613 Points ∼65% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (435 - 5209, n=576)	2062 Points ∼83% +25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	370 Points ∼21%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	366 Points ∼21% -1%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	931 Points ∼54% +152%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	303 Points ∼17% -18%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	443 Points ∼26% +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (364 - 372, n=6)	369 Points ∼21% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (53 - 8469, n=576)	1735 Points ∼100% +369%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	447 Points ∼27%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	441 Points ∼27% -1%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1081 Points ∼65% +142%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	355 Points ∼21% -21%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	526 Points ∼32% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (439 - 448, n=6)	445 Points ∼27% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 7323, n=577)	1658 Points ∼100% +271%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1596 Points ∼65%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1568 Points ∼63% -2%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2471 Points ∼100% +55%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	912 Points ∼37% -43%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1646 Points ∼67% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (1561 - 1654, n=6)	1593 Points ∼64% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (293 - 5274, n=618)	1924 Points ∼78% +21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	724 Points ∼32%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	704 Points ∼31% -3%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1651 Points ∼73% +128%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	512 Points ∼22% -29%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	637 Points ∼28% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (704 - 735, n=6)	720 Points ∼32% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 12494, n=617)	2277 Points ∼100% +215%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	824 Points ∼42%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	802 Points ∼41% -3%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1782 Points ∼91% +116%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	567 Points ∼29% -31%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	737 Points ∼38% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (802 - 835, n=6)	820 Points ∼42% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 9492, n=620)	1961 Points ∼100% +138%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	12096 Points ∼62%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	12390 Points ∼63% +2%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	19552 Points ∼100% +62%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	11443 Points ∼59% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	12075 Points ∼62% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (12096 - 12809, n=6)	12492 Points ∼64% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (735 - 58293, n=766)	15263 Points ∼78% +26%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	13615 Points ∼53%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	13440 Points ∼52% -1%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	25219 Points ∼97% +85%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	10531 Points ∼41% -23%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	11427 Points ∼44% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (13385 - 13656, n=6)	13502 Points ∼52% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (536 - 209431, n=764)	25897 Points ∼100% +90%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	13245 Points ∼56%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	13192 Points ∼56% 0%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	23693 Points ∼100% +79%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	10721 Points ∼45% -19%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	11565 Points ∼49% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (13151 - 13435, n=6)	13259 Points ∼56% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (662 - 112989, n=764)	20366 Points ∼86% +54%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	23 fps ∼52%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	23 fps ∼52% 0%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	36 fps ∼82% +57%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	19 fps ∼43% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	20 fps ∼46% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (22 - 23, n=6)	22.8 fps ∼52% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.5 - 322, n=772)	43.9 fps ∼100% +91%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	34 fps ∼65%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	34 fps ∼65% 0%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	52 fps ∼100% +53%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	26 fps ∼50% -24%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	31 fps ∼60% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (21 - 35, n=6)	32.2 fps ∼62% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 120, n=781)	30.5 fps ∼59% -10%

GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	9.9 fps ∼38%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	9.8 fps ∼38% -1%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	20 fps ∼78% +102%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	9.7 fps ∼38% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	11 fps ∼43% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (9.7 - 19, n=6)	11.3 fps ∼44% +14%
Average of class Smartphone (0.8 - 175, n=677)	25.8 fps ∼100% +161%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	18 fps ∼53%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	18 fps ∼53% 0%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	34 fps ∼100% +89%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	16 fps ∼47% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	20 fps ∼59% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (9.3 - 19, n=6)	15.4 fps ∼45% -14%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 115, n=685)	21.8 fps ∼64% +21%

GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	6.4 fps ∼31%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	6.4 fps ∼31% 0%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	13 fps ∼63% +103%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	6 fps ∼29% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	6.5 fps ∼31% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (6.4 - 6.6, n=6)	6.43 fps ∼31% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.87 - 117, n=540)	20.8 fps ∼100% +225%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	13 fps ∼50%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	13 fps ∼50% 0%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	26 fps ∼100% +100%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	11 fps ∼42% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	14 fps ∼54% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (6 - 14, n=6)	12.2 fps ∼47% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 110, n=542)	18.9 fps ∼73% +45%

GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	3.9 fps ∼35%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	3.9 fps ∼35% 0%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	9.1 fps ∼81% +133%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	4.3 fps ∼38% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	4.8 fps ∼43% +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (2 - 4.1, n=6)	3.63 fps ∼32% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (0.61 - 60, n=288)	11.2 fps ∼100% +187%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1.2 fps ∼15%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1.2 fps ∼15% 0%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2.8 fps ∼35% +133%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	1.3 fps ∼16% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1.4 fps ∼17% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (1.2 - 1.2, n=6)	1.2 fps ∼15% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.21 - 101, n=286)	8.07 fps ∼100% +573%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	6.4 fps ∼39%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	6.6 fps ∼40% +3%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	15 fps ∼90% +134%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	6.8 fps ∼41% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	7.8 fps ∼47% +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (3.5 - 6.7, n=5)	5.98 fps ∼36% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (1.4 - 60, n=292)	16.6 fps ∼100% +159%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	3.7 fps ∼19%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	3.6 fps ∼19% -3%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	8.4 fps ∼44% +127%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	3.7 fps ∼19% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	4 fps ∼21% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (3.6 - 3.7, n=6)	3.65 fps ∼19% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.6 - 257, n=291)	19.3 fps ∼100% +422%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	3.6 fps ∼26%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	3.5 fps ∼25% -3%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	7.1 fps ∼51% +97%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	2.8 fps ∼20% -22%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	4.2 fps ∼30% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (3.5 - 3.6, n=6)	3.53 fps ∼25% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (0.6 - 73, n=465)	14 fps ∼100% +289%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	7 fps ∼54%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	7 fps ∼54% 0%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	13 fps ∼100% +86%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	4 fps ∼31% -43%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	8.6 fps ∼66% +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (3.4 - 7.3, n=6)	6.48 fps ∼50% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 60, n=469)	12.5 fps ∼96% +79%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	79792 Points ∼56%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	77652 Points ∼54% -3%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	140633 Points ∼98% +76%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	71347 Points ∼50% -11%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	95464 Points ∼66% +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (75175 - 79792, n=3)	77540 Points ∼54% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 462516, n=297)	143610 Points ∼100% +80%

BaseMark OS II
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	838 Points ∼60%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	834 Points ∼60% 0%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1400 Points ∼100% +67%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	776 Points ∼55% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1106 Points ∼79% +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (816 - 1083, n=6)	874 Points ∼62% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1745, n=709)	807 Points ∼58% -4%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1009 Points ∼42%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1000 Points ∼41% -1%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1886 Points ∼78% +87%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	767 Points ∼32% -24%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	893 Points ∼37% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (995 - 1009, n=6)	1003 Points ∼41% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 16996, n=709)	2428 Points ∼100% +141%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1335 Points ∼42%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1316 Points ∼41% -1%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	3174 Points ∼100% +138%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	690 Points ∼22% -48%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	2008 Points ∼63% +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (655 - 1335, n=6)	1102 Points ∼35% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 8874, n=709)	1805 Points ∼57% +35%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	2624 Points ∼52%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	2687 Points ∼53% +2%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	5089 Points ∼100% +94%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	2195 Points ∼43% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	3372 Points ∼66% +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (2238 - 2687, n=6)	2511 Points ∼49% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 14189, n=709)	3374 Points ∼66% +29%
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
Alcatel 3 2019 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1312 Points ∼51%
Nokia 4.2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Adreno 505, 3072	1310 Points ∼51% 0%
Xiaomi Mi A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2556 Points ∼100% +95%
LG K40 Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320, 2048	975 Points ∼38% -26%
Samsung Galaxy A20e Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1608 Points ∼63% +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (1090 - 1312, n=6)	1236 Points ∼48% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 6273, n=709)	1716 Points ∼67% +31%

JetStream 1.1 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)	51.046 Points ∼100% +89%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=600)	46.3 Points ∼91% +71%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)	39.076 Points ∼77% +44%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)	27.086 Points ∼53% 0%
Alcatel 3 2019 (Chrome 72)	27.076 Points ∼53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (25.3 - 27.1, n=6)	26.3 Points ∼52% -3%

WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=236)	69.8 Points ∼100% +89%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)	58 Points ∼83% +57%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)	48 Points ∼69% +30%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)	38 Points ∼54% +3%
Alcatel 3 2019 (Chrome 72)	37 Points ∼53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (32 - 38, n=6)	35.2 Points ∼50% -5%
LG K40 (Chrome 74)	29 Points ∼42% -22%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)	9260 Points ∼100% +87%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=767)	7690 Points ∼83% +55%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)	7470 Points ∼81% +51%
Alcatel 3 2019 (Chrome 72)	4958 Points ∼54%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)	4810 Points ∼52% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (4512 - 4958, n=6)	4731 Points ∼51% -5%
LG K40 (Chrome 74)	4197 Points ∼45% -15%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
LG K40 (Chrome 74)	11955 ms * ∼100% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (9768 - 10143, n=6)	9963 ms * ∼83% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1914 - 59466, n=793)	9892 ms * ∼83% -1%
Alcatel 3 2019 (Chrome 72)	9832.4 ms * ∼82%
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74)	9768.3 ms * ∼82% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121)	5546.4 ms * ∼46% +44%
Xiaomi Mi A3 (Chrome 76)	4583.8 ms * ∼38% +53%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

	Alcatel 3 2019	Nokia 4.2	Xiaomi Mi A3	LG K40	Samsung Galaxy A20e	Average 32 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-43%	135%	-16%	-3%	-15%	13%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	64.93 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	65.87 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 1%	50.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -23%	57.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -12%	64.28 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -1%	51.8 (3.4 - 87.1, n=162) -20%	50.7 (1.7 - 87.1, n=509) -22%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	86.62 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	86.74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	67.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -22%	77.59 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -10%	79.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -9%	70.8 (8.2 - 96.5, n=162) -18%	68.7 (8.1 - 96.5, n=509) -21%
Random Write 4KB	16.05	4.31 -73%	117.4 631%	10 -38%	13.18 -18%	18.4 (0.75 - 77.3, n=203) 15%	33.1 (0.14 - 319, n=856) 106%
Random Read 4KB	84.93	17.51 -79%	126.9 49%	52.6 -38%	79.76 -6%	40.3 (3.59 - 117, n=203) -53%	57.1 (1.59 - 324, n=856) -33%
Sequential Write 256KB	87.21	18.17 -79%	184 111%	100.5 15%	103.57 19%	96 (14.8 - 189, n=203) 10%	122 (2.99 - 911, n=856) 40%
Sequential Read 256KB	305.8	220.39 -28%	502.2 64%	261.7 -14%	300.36 -2%	237 (25.8 - 452, n=203) -22%	329 (12.1 - 1802, n=856) 8%

A pleine charge

Au repos/à faible charge


31.9 °C	31.8 °C	31.2 °C
31.2 °C	31.5 °C	31.6 °C
30.8 °C	30.9 °C	30.8 °C

Maximum: 31.9 °C
Moyenne: 31.3 °C


28.9 °C	29.2 °C	31.5 °C
29 °C	29.2 °C	31.4 °C
28.3 °C	28.8 °C	29.9 °C

Maximum: 31.5 °C
Moyenne: 29.6 °C

Alimentation (valeur maximale) 26.6 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.3 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.9 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Alcatel 3 2019 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 37% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy A20e audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consommation énergétique

Éteint/en veille	0.02 / 0.15 Watts
Au repos	0.63 / 1.66 / 1.73 Watts
Fortement sollicité	3.17 / 4.75 Watts


Légende: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Alcatel 3 2019 3500 mAh	Nokia 4.2 3000 mAh	Xiaomi Mi A3 4030 mAh	LG K40 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A20e 3000 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-8%	-46%	-5%	7%	-27%	-24%
Idle Minimum *	0.63	0.74 -17%	0.8 -27%	0.68 -8%	0.66 -5%	0.82 (0.57 - 1.28, n=6) -30%	0.887 (0.2 - 3.4, n=866) -41%
Idle Average *	1.66	1.9 -14%	2 -20%	1.53 8%	1.63 2%	2.21 (1.6 - 4.5, n=6) -33%	1.754 (0.6 - 6.2, n=865) -6%
Idle Maximum *	1.73	2.21 -28%	3.3 -91%	1.95 -13%	1.67 3%	2.49 (1.73 - 4.59, n=6) -44%	2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=866) -18%
Load Average *	3.17	3.04 4%	4.1 -29%	3.5 -10%	2.77 13%	3.78 (2.57 - 5.71, n=6) -19%	4.09 (0.8 - 10.8, n=860) -29%
Load Maximum *	4.75	4.15 13%	7.7 -62%	4.9 -3%	3.66 23%	5.24 (4.12 - 6.99, n=6) -10%	6.04 (1.2 - 14.2, n=860) -27%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie


NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		15h 23min

	Alcatel 3 2019 3500 mAh	Nokia 4.2 3000 mAh	Xiaomi Mi A3 4030 mAh	LG K40 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A20e 3000 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie
WiFi v1.3	923	696 -25%	985 7%	745 -19%	715 -23%

Points positifs

+ performances

+ autonomie

+ lumineux et contrasté

Points négatifs

- port micro USB 2.0

- appareils photo

- stockage

En test : l'Alcatel 3 (2019). Modèle de test aimablement fourni par TCL Allemagne.

L’Alcatel 3 (2019) est un smartphone costaud à petit prix, qui excelle dans les tâches classiques du quotidien. Le système est toujours resté fluide tout au long de nos tests, les applis se chargeant rapidement. TCL a équipé l’appareil d’un écran lumineux et bien contrasté, qui nous a également impressionnés. De plus, l’Alcatel 3 (2019) possède une excellente autonomie, et son GPS devrait rester toujours assez précis.

L’Alcatel 3 2019 est un smartphone bon marché et fournit des performances fluides. Ses capteurs photo devraient cependant faire mieux, mais il faut avouer que l’appareil possède une bonne autonomie et un écran bien contrasté.

L’appareil possède ainsi ses défauts. Il faudra se contenter du stockage limité, d’autant qu’il n’est pas possible de stocker des applis ou leur contenu sur un stockage amovible. De plus, les capteurs photo ne suffiront que pour des photos occasionnelles. Mais vu le prix du smartphone, nous avons là des défauts acceptables. L’appareil conviendra à tous ceux qui n’en attendent pas trop de leur smartphone.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Alcatel 3 2019 - 2019-09-2709/27/2019 v7
Mike Wobker

Châssis

83%

Clavier

65 / 75 → 87%

Dispositif de pointage

92%

Connectivité

39 / 70 → 55%

Poids

93%

Autonomie

91%

Écran

79%

Performances en jeu

6 / 64 → 10%

Performances dans les applications

43 / 86 → 50%

Chauffe

94%

Nuisance sonore

100%

Audio

70 / 90 → 78%

Appareil photo

54%

Moyenne

70%

76%

Smartphone - Moyenne compensée

Linked Articles

Alcatel 3 2019 (3 Gamme)

Critique

•

Courte critique du smartphone ...

Critique

•

Courte critique du smartphone ...

Test de l'Alcatel 3 (2019) : un smartphone bon marché fluide

Comparaison des tailles

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Alcatel 3 2019 audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy A20e audio analysis

Points positifs

Points négatifs

Linked Articles

Pricecompare