Notebookcheck

Courte critique de la tablette TrekStor Surftab B10

Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Felicitas Krohn (traduit par Prévots), 03/14/2019

Tablette 10 pouces bon marché. TrekStor cible le secteur bon marché, avec des appareils performants qui cibles des usages spécifiques. Avec la Surftab B10, vous avez une tablette faite pour surfer sur Internet, mais qui ne fera pas grand-chose de plus. Dans ces tests, nous verrons ce que les clients potentiels peuvent attendre de la TrekStro Surftab B10.

Trekstor SurfTab B10 (Surftab Gamme)
Carte graphique
Mémoire
2048 Mo 
Écran
10.1 pouces 16:10, 1280 x 800 pixel 149 PPP, capacitif, IPS, brillant: oui
Disque dur
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 Go 
, 25 Go libres
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, Connectique audio: jack 3,5 mm, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: micro SD (jusqu'à 256 Go, FAT, FAT32), Capteurs: accéléromètre, micro USB
Réseau
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.0, GPS
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 9.8 x 243 x 172
Batterie
22.2 Wh, 6000 mAh Lithium-Polymère
Système d'exploitation
Android 8.1 Oreo
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 2 MPix
Appareil photo secondaire: 0.3 MPix
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: double, stéréos, Clavier: virtuel, Rétroéclairage du clavier: oui, adaptateur secteur USB, câble micro USB, câble USB OTG, chiffon de nettoyage, 24 Mois Garantie, fanless
Poids
505 g, Alimentation: 84 g
Prix
100 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

TrekStor Surftab B10
TrekStor Surftab B10
TrekStor Surftab B10
TrekStor Surftab B10
TrekStor Surftab B10

Comparaison des tailles

262 mm 159 mm 9.8 mm 497 g262 mm 157 mm 8.5 mm 580 g255 mm 155 mm 9.4 mm 415 g243 mm 172 mm 9.8 mm 505 g242 mm 168 mm 8.1 mm 480 g200.2 mm 120.3 mm 7.9 mm 342.5 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
446 MBit/s ∼100% +414%
Medion Lifetab P10606
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
305 MBit/s ∼68% +251%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
PowerVR GX6250, MT8173, 64 GB eMMC Flash
241 MBit/s ∼54% +178%
Lenovo Tab M10
Adreno 506, 450, 16 GB eMMC Flash
207 (min: 98, max: 220) MBit/s ∼46% +138%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz, 32 GB eMMC Flash
86.8 (min: 35, max: 106) MBit/s ∼19%
Alcatel 1T 10
Mali-400 MP, MT8321, 16 GB eMMC Flash
40.3 MBit/s ∼9% -54%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
450 MBit/s ∼100% +421%
Lenovo Tab M10
Adreno 506, 450, 16 GB eMMC Flash
284 (min: 246, max: 313) MBit/s ∼63% +229%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
PowerVR GX6250, MT8173, 64 GB eMMC Flash
227 MBit/s ∼50% +163%
Medion Lifetab P10606
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
186 MBit/s ∼41% +115%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz, 32 GB eMMC Flash
86.4 (min: 31, max: 99) MBit/s ∼19%
Alcatel 1T 10
Mali-400 MP, MT8321, 16 GB eMMC Flash
45.8 MBit/s ∼10% -47%
0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø86.5 (35-106)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø86.4 (31-99)
GNSS - TrekStor Surftab B10
GNSS - TrekStor Surftab B10
GNSS - TrekStor Surftab B10
GNSS - TrekStor Surftab B10
GNSS - TrekStor Surftab B10
GNSS - TrekStor Surftab B10
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Cliquer pour charger les images
TrekStor Surftab B10 - Test chart
TrekStor Surftab B10 - Test chart (Detail)
188
cd/m²
226
cd/m²
210
cd/m²
195
cd/m²
223
cd/m²
205
cd/m²
208
cd/m²
231
cd/m²
212
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 231 cd/m² Moyenne: 210.9 cd/m² Minimum: 38.5 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 81 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 223 cd/m²
Contraste: 1014:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.2 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 6.2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
78% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.17
Trekstor SurfTab B10
IPS, 1280x800, 10.1
Alcatel 1T 10
IPS, 1280x800, 10.1
Medion Lifetab P10606
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
IPS LCD, 1920x1200, 8
Lenovo Tab M10
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Screen
-12%
-32%
1%
-3%
27%
Brightness middle
223
277
24%
326
46%
454
104%
339
52%
426
91%
Brightness
211
263
25%
338
60%
411
95%
327
55%
399
89%
Brightness Distribution
81
87
7%
92
14%
83
2%
86
6%
91
12%
Black Level *
0.22
0.49
-123%
0.56
-155%
0.73
-232%
0.42
-91%
0.38
-73%
Contrast
1014
565
-44%
582
-43%
622
-39%
807
-20%
1121
11%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.2
5.8
6%
9.1
-47%
5.2
16%
5.8
6%
4.5
27%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
13
13.1
-1%
18.2
-40%
8.36
36%
11.6
11%
7.9
39%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.2
5.4
13%
12
-94%
4.7
24%
8.6
-39%
5.2
16%
Gamma
2.17 101%
2.13 103%
2.32 95%
2.271 97%
2.16 102%
2.23 99%
CCT
7022 93%
7260 90%
11359 57%
7361 88%
8718 75%
6875 95%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9622 (minimum : 43 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
38.4 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 21.6 ms hausse
↘ 16.8 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 95 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (25.4 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
56.4 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 26 ms hausse
↘ 30.4 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 92 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (40.6 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score
Average of class Tablet (862 - 43802, n=33)
6525 Points ∼15% +482%
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
5811 Points ∼13% +418%
Medion Lifetab P10606
2091 Points ∼5% +87%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1562 Points ∼4% +39%
Average MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz (1121 - 1515, n=2)
1318 Points ∼3% +18%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
1121 Points ∼3%
Alcatel 1T 10
862 Points ∼2% -23%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
5860 Points ∼16% +277%
Average of class Tablet (1106 - 18041, n=50)
4828 Points ∼13% +211%
Lenovo Tab M10
3897 Points ∼11% +151%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
3305 Points ∼9% +113%
Medion Lifetab P10606
2477 Points ∼7% +59%
Average MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz (1553 - 2009, n=2)
1781 Points ∼5% +15%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
1553 Points ∼4%
Alcatel 1T 10
1106 Points ∼3% -29%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Tablet (429 - 5002, n=50)
1704 Points ∼27% +210%
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
1642 Points ∼26% +199%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1204 Points ∼19% +119%
Lenovo Tab M10
774 Points ∼12% +41%
Medion Lifetab P10606
658 Points ∼10% +20%
Average MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz (549 - 723, n=2)
636 Points ∼10% +16%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
549 Points ∼9%
Alcatel 1T 10
429 Points ∼7% -22%
PCMark for Android - Work 2.0 performance score
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
6047 Points ∼51% +97%
Average of class Tablet (2345 - 6698, n=37)
4332 Points ∼36% +41%
Lenovo Tab M10
4238 Points ∼35% +38%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
3678 Points ∼31% +20%
Medion Lifetab P10606
3508 Points ∼29% +14%
Average MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz (3071 - 3424, n=2)
3248 Points ∼27% +6%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
3071 Points ∼26%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
2797 Points ∼62%
Lenovo Tab M10
1785 Points ∼39%
Average of class Tablet (1372 - 3347, n=41)
1678 Points ∼37%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1386 Points ∼31%
Medion Lifetab P10606
1211 Points ∼27%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
Points ∼0%
Average MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz
0 Points ∼0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (547 - 6993, n=41)
1711 Points ∼21%
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
1267 Points ∼15%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
528 Points ∼6%
Lenovo Tab M10
413 Points ∼5%
Medion Lifetab P10606
286 Points ∼3%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
Points ∼0%
Average MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz
0 Points ∼0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (646 - 5367, n=42)
1464 Points ∼23%
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
1442 Points ∼23%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
612 Points ∼10%
Lenovo Tab M10
498 Points ∼8%
Medion Lifetab P10606
344 Points ∼5%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
Points ∼0%
Average MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz
0 Points ∼0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
2758 Points ∼59% +259%
Lenovo Tab M10
1782 Points ∼38% +132%
Average of class Tablet (739 - 4700, n=46)
1677 Points ∼36% +118%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1399 Points ∼30% +82%
Medion Lifetab P10606
1202 Points ∼26% +57%
Average MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz (768 - 945, n=2)
857 Points ∼18% +12%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
768 Points ∼16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (165 - 28751, n=46)
3225 Points ∼11% +1562%
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
2033 Points ∼7% +948%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
754 Points ∼3% +289%
Lenovo Tab M10
712 Points ∼2% +267%
Medion Lifetab P10606
495 Points ∼2% +155%
Average MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz (194 - 227, n=2)
211 Points ∼1% +9%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
194 Points ∼1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
2148 Points ∼16% +822%
Average of class Tablet (207 - 13454, n=46)
2129 Points ∼16% +814%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
840 Points ∼6% +261%
Lenovo Tab M10
822 Points ∼6% +253%
Medion Lifetab P10606
569 Points ∼4% +144%
Average MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz (233 - 273, n=2)
253 Points ∼2% +9%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
233 Points ∼2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
2700 Points ∼63%
Lenovo Tab M10
1818 Points ∼43%
Average of class Tablet (1654 - 3312, n=60)
1523 Points ∼36%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1363 Points ∼32%
Medion Lifetab P10606
1221 Points ∼29%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
Points ∼0%
Average MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz
0 Points ∼0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Average of class Tablet (542 - 5760, n=60)
1233 Points ∼19%
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
1195 Points ∼19%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
413 Points ∼6%
Lenovo Tab M10
363 Points ∼6%
Medion Lifetab P10606
240 Points ∼4%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
Points ∼0%
Average MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz
0 Points ∼0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
1364 Points ∼24%
Average of class Tablet (639 - 4949, n=66)
1084 Points ∼19%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
489 Points ∼9%
Lenovo Tab M10
442 Points ∼8%
Medion Lifetab P10606
292 Points ∼5%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
Points ∼0%
Average MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz (0 - 0, n=2)
0 Points ∼0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
2780 Points ∼66% +251%
Lenovo Tab M10
1816 Points ∼43% +129%
Average of class Tablet (793 - 3184, n=62)
1460 Points ∼34% +84%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1347 Points ∼32% +70%
Medion Lifetab P10606
1199 Points ∼28% +51%
Average MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz (793 - 973, n=2)
883 Points ∼21% +11%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
793 Points ∼19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
1936 Points ∼18% +2290%
Average of class Tablet (42 - 10647, n=62)
1782 Points ∼17% +2100%
Lenovo Tab M10
694 Points ∼7% +757%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
598 Points ∼6% +638%
Medion Lifetab P10606
496 Points ∼5% +512%
Average MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz (81 - 168, n=2)
125 Points ∼1% +54%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
81 Points ∼1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
2071 Points ∼27% +1950%
Average of class Tablet (53 - 6997, n=66)
1394 Points ∼18% +1280%
Lenovo Tab M10
804 Points ∼10% +696%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
682 Points ∼9% +575%
Medion Lifetab P10606
570 Points ∼7% +464%
Average MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz (101 - 241, n=2)
171 Points ∼2% +69%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
101 Points ∼1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
20173 Points ∼23% +103%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
15117 Points ∼17% +52%
Lenovo Tab M10
14076 Points ∼16% +42%
Average of class Tablet (3675 - 51374, n=149)
13374 Points ∼15% +35%
Average MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz (9926 - 11472, n=2)
10699 Points ∼12% +8%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
9926 Points ∼11%
Medion Lifetab P10606
8995 Points ∼10% -9%
Alcatel 1T 10
7924 Points ∼9% -20%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
29422 Points ∼6% +472%
Average of class Tablet (2109 - 194856, n=149)
20383 Points ∼4% +296%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
12771 Points ∼2% +148%
Lenovo Tab M10
12386 Points ∼2% +141%
Medion Lifetab P10606
9602 Points ∼2% +87%
Average MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz (5144 - 6067, n=2)
5606 Points ∼1% +9%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
5144 Points ∼1%
Alcatel 1T 10
2468 Points ∼0% -52%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
26702 Points ∼11% +363%
Average of class Tablet (2411 - 106954, n=150)
16057 Points ∼7% +179%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
13227 Points ∼6% +130%
Lenovo Tab M10
12726 Points ∼5% +121%
Medion Lifetab P10606
9460 Points ∼4% +64%
Average MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz (5761 - 6778, n=2)
6270 Points ∼3% +9%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
5761 Points ∼2%
Alcatel 1T 10
2913 Points ∼1% -49%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
51 fps ∼0% +448%
Average of class Tablet (4.2 - 451, n=176)
32.2 fps ∼0% +246%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
22 fps ∼0% +137%
Lenovo Tab M10
22 fps ∼0% +137%
Medion Lifetab P10606
16 fps ∼0% +72%
Average MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz (9.3 - 12, n=2)
10.7 fps ∼0% +15%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
9.3 fps ∼0%
Alcatel 1T 10
7.8 fps ∼0% -16%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
47 fps ∼1% +213%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
21 fps ∼1% +40%
Average of class Tablet (3.7 - 120, n=180)
21 fps ∼1% +40%
Lenovo Tab M10
20 fps ∼1% +33%
Medion Lifetab P10606
15 fps ∼0% 0%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
15 fps ∼0%
Average MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz (11 - 15, n=2)
13 fps ∼0% -13%
Alcatel 1T 10
4.4 fps ∼0% -71%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
23 fps ∼4% +539%
Average of class Tablet (1.8 - 220, n=114)
21.3 fps ∼4% +492%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
9.9 fps ∼2% +175%
Lenovo Tab M10
9.2 fps ∼2% +156%
Medion Lifetab P10606
7.1 fps ∼1% +97%
Average MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz (3.6 - 4.3, n=2)
3.95 fps ∼1% +10%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
3.6 fps ∼1%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
21 fps ∼6% +204%
Average of class Tablet (2.9 - 110, n=117)
14.7 fps ∼4% +113%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
9.5 fps ∼3% +38%
Lenovo Tab M10
8.8 fps ∼2% +28%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
6.9 fps ∼2%
Medion Lifetab P10606
6.6 fps ∼2% -4%
Average MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz (4.3 - 6.9, n=2)
5.6 fps ∼2% -19%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (2 - 173, n=63)
20.4 fps ∼0% +827%
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
15 fps ∼0% +582%
Lenovo Tab M10
6 fps ∼0% +173%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4.9 fps ∼0% +123%
Average MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz (2.2 - 2.6, n=2)
2.4 fps ∼0% +9%
Medion Lifetab P10606
2.2 fps ∼0% 0%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
2.2 fps ∼0%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
13 fps ∼0% +165%
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 95, n=63)
12.6 fps ∼0% +157%
Lenovo Tab M10
5.7 fps ∼0% +16%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
4.9 fps ∼0%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4.7 fps ∼0% -4%
Medion Lifetab P10606
4.3 fps ∼0% -12%
Average MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz (2.7 - 4.9, n=2)
3.8 fps ∼0% -22%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
120479 Points ∼44% +260%
Average of class Tablet (14200 - 227987, n=65)
70634 Points ∼26% +111%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
63777 Points ∼23% +91%
Lenovo Tab M10
58122 Points ∼21% +74%
Medion Lifetab P10606
44015 Points ∼16% +32%
Average MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz (33452 - 42179, n=2)
37816 Points ∼14% +13%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
33452 Points ∼12%
Alcatel 1T 10
26504 Points ∼10% -21%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (20856 - 566378, n=29)
157250 Points ∼28% +298%
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
142189 Points ∼25% +260%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
77717 Points ∼14% +96%
Lenovo Tab M10
70878 Points ∼13% +79%
Medion Lifetab P10606
44992 Points ∼8% +14%
Average MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz (39551 - 48234, n=2)
43893 Points ∼8% +11%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
39551 Points ∼7%
Alcatel 1T 10
20856 Points ∼4% -47%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
1078 Points ∼53% +10680%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1010 Points ∼50% +10000%
Average of class Tablet (9 - 2034, n=107)
754 Points ∼37% +7440%
Lenovo Tab M10
735 Points ∼36% +7250%
Medion Lifetab P10606
10 Points ∼0% 0%
Alcatel 1T 10
10 Points ∼0% 0%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
10 Points ∼0%
Average MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz (10 - 10, n=2)
10 Points ∼0% 0%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (98 - 28853, n=107)
2285 Points ∼8% +639%
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
2257 Points ∼8% +630%
Lenovo Tab M10
949 Points ∼3% +207%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
833 Points ∼3% +170%
Medion Lifetab P10606
729 Points ∼3% +136%
Average MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz (309 - 339, n=2)
324 Points ∼1% +5%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
309 Points ∼1%
Alcatel 1T 10
142 Points ∼0% -54%
Memory
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
2347 Points ∼37% +294%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1513 Points ∼24% +154%
Average of class Tablet (56 - 5423, n=107)
1079 Points ∼17% +81%
Lenovo Tab M10
846 Points ∼13% +42%
Medion Lifetab P10606
772 Points ∼12% +30%
Average MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz (595 - 674, n=2)
635 Points ∼10% +7%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
595 Points ∼9%
Alcatel 1T 10
397 Points ∼6% -33%
System
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
5282 Points ∼32% +365%
Lenovo Tab M10
2845 Points ∼17% +150%
Average of class Tablet (482 - 16467, n=107)
2486 Points ∼15% +119%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2329 Points ∼14% +105%
Medion Lifetab P10606
1744 Points ∼11% +53%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
1137 Points ∼7%
Average MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz (1064 - 1137, n=2)
1101 Points ∼7% -3%
Alcatel 1T 10
945 Points ∼6% -17%
Overall
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
2322 Points ∼27% +990%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1312 Points ∼16% +516%
Average of class Tablet (150 - 8450, n=107)
1289 Points ∼15% +505%
Lenovo Tab M10
1138 Points ∼13% +434%
Medion Lifetab P10606
313 Points ∼4% +47%
Average MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz (213 - 219, n=2)
216 Points ∼3% +1%
Trekstor SurfTab B10
213 Points ∼3%
Alcatel 1T 10
150 Points ∼2% -30%

Légende

 
Trekstor SurfTab B10 MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Alcatel 1T 10 Mediatek MT8321, ARM Mali-400 MP, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Medion Lifetab P10606 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Tab M10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 Mediatek MT8173, PowerVR GX6250, 64 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 (Chrome 68)
54.672 Points ∼100% +227%
Average of class Tablet (10.9 - 279, n=81)
52.5 Points ∼96% +214%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
46.39 Points ∼85% +178%
Lenovo Tab M10 (Chrome 71.0.3578.99)
22.219 Points ∼41% +33%
Medion Lifetab P10606 (Chrome 60)
18.873 Points ∼35% +13%
Average MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz (16.7 - 19.7, n=2)
18.2 Points ∼33% +9%
Trekstor SurfTab B10 (Chrome 72)
16.697 Points ∼31%
Alcatel 1T 10 (Chrome 69)
10.907 Points ∼20% -35%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 (Chrome 68)
10300 Points ∼100% +247%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
8570 Points ∼83% +188%
Average of class Tablet (1238 - 45734, n=168)
6775 Points ∼66% +128%
Lenovo Tab M10 (Chrome 71.0.3578.99)
3990 Points ∼39% +34%
Average MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz (2972 - 3550, n=2)
3261 Points ∼32% +10%
Medion Lifetab P10606 (Chrome 60)
3059 Points ∼30% +3%
Trekstor SurfTab B10 (Chrome 72)
2972 Points ∼29%
Alcatel 1T 10 (Chrome 69)
1718 Points ∼17% -42%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Alcatel 1T 10 (Chrome 69)
19084.6 ms * ∼100% -23%
Trekstor SurfTab B10 (Chrome 72)
15571 ms * ∼82%
Average MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz (12550 - 15571, n=2)
14060 ms * ∼74% +10%
Medion Lifetab P10606 (Chrome 60)
12793.8 ms * ∼67% +18%
Lenovo Tab M10 (Chrome 71.0.3578.99)
11447.7 ms * ∼60% +26%
Average of class Tablet (603 - 43092, n=179)
9192 ms * ∼48% +41%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
3975.5 ms * ∼21% +74%
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 (Chrome 68)
3796.2 ms * ∼20% +76%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Trekstor SurfTab B10Alcatel 1T 10Medion Lifetab P10606Xiaomi Mi Pad 4Lenovo Tab M10Amazon Fire HD 10 2017Average 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-10%
51%
271%
62%
40%
60%
-20%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
62.45 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
31.99 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-49%
64.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
61.16 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
61.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
30.14 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-52%
49 (3.4 - 87.1, n=128)
-22%
45.4 (14.6 - 73.8, n=51)
-27%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
39.81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-52%
79.64 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
84.17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
83.48 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
55.49 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-33%
67.8 (8.2 - 96.5, n=128)
-19%
62.5 (21.2 - 87.7, n=51)
-25%
Random Write 4KB
8.43
10.1
20%
12.02
43%
77.87
824%
11.32
34%
9.37
11%
18.8 (0.75 - 77.3, n=171)
123%
5.82 (0.13 - 77.9, n=202)
-31%
Random Read 4KB
16.96
12.72
-25%
34.59
104%
94.18
455%
52.5
210%
27.72
63%
38.2 (3.59 - 117, n=171)
125%
18.6 (1.32 - 142, n=202)
10%
Sequential Write 256KB
70.5
83.7
19%
74.24
5%
207.87
195%
52.6
-25%
147.67
109%
95 (14.8 - 189, n=171)
35%
38.4 (2.04 - 208, n=202)
-46%
Sequential Read 256KB
108.99
137.22
26%
274.74
152%
277.65
155%
279.94
157%
262.2
141%
234 (25.8 - 452, n=171)
115%
109 (6.75 - 741, n=202)
0%
 37.8 °C36.8 °C27.7 °C 
 33 °C31.9 °C27.5 °C 
 29.5 °C28.1 °C26.7 °C 
Maximum: 37.8 °C
Moyenne: 31 °C
26.3 °C27.6 °C28.9 °C
26.2 °C35.1 °C33.6 °C
25.4 °C27.7 °C28.7 °C
Maximum: 35.1 °C
Moyenne: 28.8 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  30.7 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 34.8 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.2 to 51.8 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
TrekStor Surftab B10 - Relevé thermique - Avant.
Relevé thermique - Avant.
TrekStor Surftab B10 - Relevé thermique - À l'arrière.
Relevé thermique - À l'arrière.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.645.22528.234.23124.631.4402120.7502834.56327.226.58025.428.310023.621.912519.221.51602020.420016.418.22501723.631516.532.240015.64250014.349.663012.858.98001466.6100014.672.9125014.274.416001474.9200014.177.7250014.475.7315014.275.5400014.678.5500014.180.8630014.679.5800014.771.91000015.163.61250014.960.3160001557.2SPL26.688.1N0.866.3median 14.6median 63.6Delta1.619.528.630.724.926.324.627.126.423.530.832.323.621.520.220.419.91917.622.719.13619.135.917.44016.945.316.850.615.155.316.560.915.662.91561.215.562.415.362.815.763.815.564.915.564.415.459.515.858.11656.315.853.616.15516.153.517.358.527.973.5130.3median 16median 56.30.69.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseTrekstor SurfTab B10Medion Lifetab P10606
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Trekstor SurfTab B10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 40.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 11.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (37.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Medion Lifetab P10606 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.02 / 0.43 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 2.2 / 3.94 / 4 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 9.35 / 10.92 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Trekstor SurfTab B10
6000 mAh
Alcatel 1T 10
4000 mAh
Medion Lifetab P10606
7000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
6000 mAh
Lenovo Tab M10
4850 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
6300 mAh
Power Consumption
28%
4%
17%
20%
11%
Idle Minimum *
2.2
1.01
54%
1.4
36%
1.2
45%
0.98
55%
1.55
30%
Idle Average *
3.94
3.69
6%
4.17
-6%
2.2
44%
4.45
-13%
4.17
-6%
Idle Maximum *
4
3.81
5%
4.2
-5%
4.1
-3%
4.51
-13%
4.25
-6%
Load Average *
9.35
6.17
34%
7.5
20%
8.2
12%
5.78
38%
7.13
24%
Load Maximum *
10.92
6.19
43%
13.71
-26%
12.2
-12%
7.18
34%
9.63
12%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
8h 35min
Trekstor SurfTab B10
6000 mAh
Alcatel 1T 10
4000 mAh
Medion Lifetab P10606
7000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
6000 mAh
Lenovo Tab M10
4850 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
6300 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie
WiFi v1.3
515
545
6%
796
55%
827
61%
580
13%
542
5%

Points positifs

+ léger
+ prix
+ valeur des noirs
+ qualité de construction

Points négatifs

- pas de LTE
- WLAN lent
- luminosité maximale
- appareil photo

Verdict

En test : la TrekStor Surftab B10. Modèle de test fourni par TrekStor Allemagne.
En test : la TrekStor Surftab B10. Modèle de test fourni par TrekStor Allemagne.

Nos tests montrent que la TrekStor Surftab B10 est une tablette simple pour un usage web. Regarder ses mails, naviguer sur Internet et occasionnellement regarder des contenus vidéo ne sont pas un problème. Grâce à son poids réduit, elle est également très portable ; mais l’absence de connectivité mobile à Internet la retreint plus ou moins. La possibilité d’intégré une carte micro SD est heureuse, pour compenser le stockage interne vraiment limité.

La TrekStor Surftab B10 est une tablette bon marché, d’abord adaptée aux tâches Internet via Wifi.

En revanche l’ajout d’un appareil photo est pour ainsi dire inutile, tellement il est médiocre. Le GPS met du temps à déterminer la position, et la faible luminosité de l’écran rend l’usage à l’extérieur presque impossible. Les clients potentiels doivent avoir conscience que la tablette n’est vraiment adaptée qu’à une légère navigation web au salon, connectée au Wifi. Si c’est ce que vous cherchez, alors la TrekStor Surftab B10 sera assez performante pour cette tâche simple.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Trekstor SurfTab B10 - 03/05/2019 v6
Mike Wobker

Châssis
76%
Clavier
67 / 80 → 83%
Dispositif de pointage
67%
Connectivité
28 / 65 → 43%
Poids
83 / 40-88 → 90%
Autonomie
91%
Écran
76%
Performances en jeu
8 / 68 → 12%
Performances dans les applications
27 / 76 → 36%
Chauffe
93%
Nuisance sonore
100%
Audio
54 / 91 → 59%
Appareil photo
34 / 85 → 40%
Moyenne
62%
74%
Tablet - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Courte critique de la tablette TrekStor Surftab B10
Mike Wobker, 2019-03-14 (Update: 2019-03-14)