Notebookcheck

Courte critique du PC portable HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng (i7-8550U, MX150, FHD)

Daniel Puschina, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, Felicitas Krohn (traduit par Prévots), 10/15/2018

Extérieur au top, mais que vaut l'intérieur ? HP sait comment séduire les clients, avec des machines au design réussi et à la qualité de construction à toute épreuve. Le nouveau Pavilion 14 est un nouveau portable HP premium abordable qui répond à ce cahier des charges. Mais nous sommes également intéressés à savoir comment l’appareil se comporte sous son apparence sable anodisée. Le dernier portable Pavilion de HP tient-il la dragée haute à ses concurrents, ou ne vaut-il le coup que par son apparence ?

HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng (Pavilion 14 Gamme)
Carte graphique
Mémoire
8192 Mo 
, DDR4
Écran
14 pouces 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPP, BOE072C, IPS, brillant: non
Carte mère
Intel Sunrise Point-LP
Disque dur
SanDisk X600 SD9SN8W-128G, 128 Go 
Connexions
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 Encoche de Sécurité Kensington, Connectique audio: combo écouteurs et micro jack 3,5 mm, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: SD, 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales
Réseau
RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: C821 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 17.9 x 326.8 x 225.5
Batterie
41 Wh Lithium-Ion
Système d'exploitation
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Appareil photo
Webcam: webcam HP Wide Vision HD
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: deux haut-parleurs, Clavier: chiclet, Rétroéclairage du clavier: oui, adaptateur secteur 65 W, 12 Mois Garantie
Poids
1.69 kg
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparaison des tailles

331 mm 226.8 mm 18.45 mm 1.3 kg326.8 mm 225.5 mm 17.9 mm 1.7 kg324 mm 225 mm 15.9 mm 1.3 kg323.4 mm 226 mm 16.4 mm 1.5 kg304 mm 217 mm 14.6 mm 1.3 kg
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
163.8 MB/s ∼100% +314%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
75.2 MB/s ∼46% +90%
Average of class Multimedia
  (11.2 - 190, n=164)
57 MB/s ∼35% +44%
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
39.6 MB/s ∼24%
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
39 MB/s ∼24% -2%
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
35.61 MB/s ∼22% -10%
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26.8 MB/s ∼16% -32%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
212.4 MB/s ∼100% +479%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87.4 MB/s ∼41% +138%
Average of class Multimedia
  (10.2 - 253, n=161)
73.8 MB/s ∼35% +101%
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
36.8 MB/s ∼17% 0%
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
36.7 MB/s ∼17%
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
36 MB/s ∼17% -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27.2 MB/s ∼13% -26%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
656 MBit/s ∼100% +133%
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
648 MBit/s ∼99% +131%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
623 MBit/s ∼95% +122%
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter
525 MBit/s ∼80% +87%
Average of class Multimedia
  (44 - 949, n=124)
500 MBit/s ∼76% +78%
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
302 MBit/s ∼46% +7%
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng
RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: C821
281 MBit/s ∼43%
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng
RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: C821
280 MBit/s ∼43% 0%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter
630 MBit/s ∼100% +120%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
515 MBit/s ∼82% +79%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
479 MBit/s ∼76% +67%
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
478 MBit/s ∼76% +67%
Average of class Multimedia
  (46.1 - 949, n=123)
477 MBit/s ∼76% +66%
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
289 MBit/s ∼46% +1%
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng
RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: C821
287 MBit/s ∼46%
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng
RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: C821
269 MBit/s ∼43% -6%
224
cd/m²
210
cd/m²
218
cd/m²
217
cd/m²
239
cd/m²
216
cd/m²
230
cd/m²
234
cd/m²
223
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 239 cd/m² Moyenne: 223.4 cd/m² Minimum: 13 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 88 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 205 cd/m²
Contraste: 885:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.3 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.1, calibrated: 3.64
ΔE Greyscale 5.85 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
59% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.45
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng
BOE072C, , 1920x1080, 14
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng
AU Optronics AUO23ED, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7
JDI LPM139M422A, , 3000x2000, 13.9
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB
AUO B140QAN02.3, , 2560x1440, 14
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
LP140QH2-SPB1, , 2560x1440, 14
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
NV140FHM-N62, BOE0718, , 1920x1080, 14
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
BOE0730, , 3840x2160, 15.6
Response Times
8%
7%
-24%
10%
-12%
129%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
40 (21, 19)
40 (18, 22)
-0%
42 (20, 22)
-5%
58.4 (29.2, 29.2)
-46%
36 (17.6, 18.4)
10%
43.6 (24.4, 19.2)
-9%
38 (20.4, 17.6)
5%
Response Time Black / White *
31 (18, 13)
26 (16, 10)
16%
25 (12, 13)
19%
31.2 (14.8, 16.4)
-1%
28 (15.6, 12.4)
10%
39.2 (22.8, 16.4)
-26%
27.6 (15.6, 12)
11%
PWM Frequency
200 (90)
200 (99)
0%
943.4 (99)
372%
Screen
-3%
64%
24%
31%
21%
14%
Brightness middle
239
186
-22%
550
130%
311
30%
311
30%
310.4
30%
329.3
38%
Brightness
223
180
-19%
512
130%
293
31%
302
35%
303
36%
316
42%
Brightness Distribution
88
88
0%
88
0%
85
-3%
91
3%
89
1%
84
-5%
Black Level *
0.27
0.15
44%
0.32
-19%
0.2
26%
0.36
-33%
0.31
-15%
0.31
-15%
Contrast
885
1240
40%
1719
94%
1555
76%
864
-2%
1001
13%
1062
20%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.3
5.94
-12%
2.28
57%
6
-13%
3
43%
4.07
23%
4.78
10%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.03
10.81
-8%
4.36
57%
11.6
-16%
6.1
39%
8.33
17%
11.75
-17%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
3.64
6.07
-67%
0.8
78%
1.6
56%
1.7
53%
4.07
-12%
3.51
4%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.85
4.44
24%
3.27
44%
8.7
-49%
4
32%
2.8
52%
7.9
-35%
Gamma
2.45 90%
2.81 78%
2.35 94%
2.19 100%
2.17 101%
2.217 99%
2.24 98%
CCT
7169 91%
6272 104%
6819 95%
8426 77%
6961 93%
7033 92%
8323 78%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
38
35
-8%
62
63%
60.9
60%
66.7
76%
55.3
46%
58.8
55%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
59
55
-7%
98
66%
96
63%
96.7
64%
84.6
43%
90.4
53%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
3% / -1%
36% / 55%
0% / 16%
21% / 28%
5% / 14%
72% / 38%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng - Couverture à 59 % de l'espace sRGB...
Couverture à 59 % de l'espace sRGB...
...et à 38 % de l'AdbobeRGB.
...et à 38 % de l'AdbobeRGB.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
31 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 18 ms hausse
↘ 13 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 78 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (25.4 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
40 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 21 ms hausse
↘ 19 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont similaires à la moyenne (40.6 ms) de tous les appareils testés.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) décelé 200 Hz ≤ 90 Niveau de luminosité

Le rétroéclairage de l'écran scintille à la fréquence de 200 Hz (certainement du fait de l'utilisation d'une MDI - Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) à un niveau de luminosité inférieur ou égal à 90 % . Aucun scintillement ne devrait être perceptible au-dessus de cette valeur.

La fréquence de rafraîchissement de 200 Hz est relativement faible, les personnes les plus sensibles devraient percevoir un scintillement et être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire accrue (avec le niveau de luminosité indiqué)

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9618 (minimum : 43 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng - LatencyMon.
LatencyMon.
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng - HWInfo.
HWInfo.
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng - CPU-Z.
CPU-Z.
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng - GPU-Z.
GPU-Z.
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
Intel Core i7-8550U
170 Points ∼100% +2%
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng
Intel Core i7-8550U
166 Points ∼98%
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
Intel Core i7-8550U
165 Points ∼97% -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB
Intel Core i7-8550U
161 Points ∼95% -3%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U
  (108 - 172, n=74)
160 Points ∼94% -4%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
Intel Core i7-8550U
149 Points ∼88% -10%
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7
Intel Core i7-8550U
141 Points ∼83% -15%
Average of class Multimedia
  (36 - 191, n=349)
126 Points ∼74% -24%
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
124 Points ∼73% -25%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
Intel Core i7-8550U
723 Points ∼100% +37%
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
606 (min: 417.88, max: 605.96) Points ∼84% +15%
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
Intel Core i7-8550U
589 Points ∼81% +12%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U
  (301 - 761, n=76)
570 Points ∼79% +8%
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng
Intel Core i7-8550U
527.4 (min: 505.84, max: 527.4) Points ∼73%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
Intel Core i7-8550U
523 Points ∼72% -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB
Intel Core i7-8550U
518 Points ∼72% -2%
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7
Intel Core i7-8550U
514 Points ∼71% -3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (73 - 1550, n=364)
471 Points ∼65% -11%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
166 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
97.44 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
527.4 Points
Aide
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730Tooltip
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng Intel Core i7-8550U: Ø512 (505.84-527.4)
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 Intel Core i7-8550U: Ø485 (464.55-537.4)
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB Intel Core i7-8550U: Ø481 (476.32-517.64)
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 Intel Core i7-8550U: Ø633 (602.16-721.94)
Asus Zenbook UX430UN Intel Core i7-8550U: Ø556 (529.72-624.09)
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr Intel Core i7-8550U: Ø519 (509.07-542.3)
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4909 Points ∼100% +10%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (4063 - 5228, n=20)
4771 Points ∼97% +7%
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SanDisk SD8SN8U512G1002
4732 Points ∼96% +6%
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
4648 Points ∼95% +4%
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng
Vega 8, 2500U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
4467 Points ∼91% 0%
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SanDisk X600 SD9SN8W-128G
4456 Points ∼91%
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
4417 Points ∼90% -1%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB
4323 Points ∼88% -3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2213 - 5651, n=266)
4271 Points ∼87% -4%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SanDisk SD8SN8U512G1002
3792 Points ∼100% +12%
Average Intel Core i7-8550U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (3145 - 4130, n=21)
3656 Points ∼96% +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3540 Points ∼93% +5%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB
3482 Points ∼92% +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
3463 Points ∼91% +2%
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng
Vega 8, 2500U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7
3404 Points ∼90% +1%
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SanDisk X600 SD9SN8W-128G
3379 Points ∼89%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1740 - 4693, n=286)
3370 Points ∼89% 0%
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7
GeForce MX150, 8550U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
3183 Points ∼84% -6%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3379 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4456 points
Aide
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng
SanDisk X600 SD9SN8W-128G
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7
Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB
SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
103%
138%
446%
Write 4k QD32
116.4
273.6
135%
260.2
124%
706.2
507%
Read 4k QD32
262.1
360
37%
330.3
26%
446.6
70%
Write 4k
68.66
117.5
71%
99.97
46%
146.8
114%
Read 4k
33.15
33.79
2%
39.83
20%
62.65
89%
Write 512
158.2
461.4
192%
642.2
306%
1863
1078%
Read 512
309.6
627.9
103%
769.3
148%
1799
481%
Write Seq
202.4
459.9
127%
733.3
262%
1858
818%
Read Seq
508.2
1317
159%
1360
168%
2588
409%
SanDisk X600 SD9SN8W-128G
Sequential Read: 508.2 MB/s
Sequential Write: 202.4 MB/s
512K Read: 309.6 MB/s
512K Write: 158.2 MB/s
4K Read: 33.15 MB/s
4K Write: 68.66 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 262.1 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 116.4 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
4708 Points ∼100% +60%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (2796 - 4905, n=47)
4191 Points ∼89% +42%
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
3867 Points ∼82% +31%
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
3833 Points ∼81% +30%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
3551 Points ∼75% +21%
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
3450 Points ∼73% +17%
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
2945 Points ∼63%
Average of class Multimedia
  (352 - 18234, n=618)
2841 Points ∼60% -4%
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
2381 Points ∼51% -19%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
3622 Points ∼100% +2%
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
3561 Points ∼98%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (2323 - 3739, n=44)
3310 Points ∼91% -7%
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
3122 Points ∼86% -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
2807 Points ∼77% -21%
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
2793 Points ∼77% -22%
Average of class Multimedia
  (337 - 14463, n=394)
2756 Points ∼76% -23%
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
2323 Points ∼64% -35%
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
1715 Points ∼47% -52%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
19900 Points ∼100% +1%
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
19698 Points ∼99%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (16227 - 22183, n=43)
19512 Points ∼98% -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
18946 Points ∼95% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
17743 Points ∼89% -10%
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
17469 Points ∼88% -11%
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U
17345 Points ∼87% -12%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2468 - 77755, n=397)
16353 Points ∼82% -17%
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
11226 Points ∼56% -43%
3DMark 11 Performance
3130 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
12943 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
3215 points
Aide
Far Cry 5
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Average of class Multimedia
  (7 - 77, n=17)
29.3 fps ∼100% +193%
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
15 (min: 11, max: 20) fps ∼51% +50%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (10 - 18, n=6)
14.8 fps ∼51% +48%
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SanDisk X600 SD9SN8W-128G
10 fps ∼34%
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T
Average of class Multimedia
  (7 - 81, n=20)
27 fps ∼100% +125%
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
17 (min: 12, max: 23) fps ∼63% +42%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (12 - 21, n=7)
17 fps ∼63% +42%
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SanDisk X600 SD9SN8W-128G
12 fps ∼44%
1280x720 Low Preset AA:T
Average of class Multimedia
  (14 - 103, n=21)
48.6 fps ∼100% +57%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (31 - 46, n=7)
39 fps ∼80% +26%
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
34 (min: 26, max: 38) fps ∼70% +10%
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SanDisk X600 SD9SN8W-128G
31 fps ∼64%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 High Preset AA:SM
Average of class Multimedia
  (6 - 62, n=13)
22.3 fps ∼100% +103%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (9 - 15, n=5)
12 fps ∼54% +9%
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SanDisk X600 SD9SN8W-128G
11 fps ∼49%
1920x1080 Medium Preset
Average of class Multimedia
  (6 - 65, n=15)
24 fps ∼100% +85%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (11 - 18, n=5)
15.4 fps ∼64% +18%
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SanDisk X600 SD9SN8W-128G
13 fps ∼54%
1280x720 Lowest Preset
Average of class Multimedia
  (13 - 97, n=17)
49.5 fps ∼100% +50%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (30 - 50, n=5)
40.8 fps ∼82% +24%
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SanDisk X600 SD9SN8W-128G
33 fps ∼67%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Multimedia
  (3.7 - 37.2, n=18)
13.1 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (7 - 10, n=4)
8.38 fps ∼64%
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SanDisk SD8SN8U512G1002
7 fps ∼53%
1920x1080 Standard Quality
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.6 - 37.4, n=18)
20 fps ∼100% +67%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (12 - 17.3, n=5)
14.2 fps ∼71% +18%
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SanDisk SD8SN8U512G1002
12.6 fps ∼63% +5%
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SanDisk X600 SD9SN8W-128G
12 fps ∼60%
1280x720 Lite Quality
Average of class Multimedia
  (9 - 63.6, n=22)
30.9 fps ∼100% +34%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150
  (23 - 35, n=6)
28.9 fps ∼94% +26%
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SanDisk SD8SN8U512G1002
25.4 fps ∼82% +10%
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng
GeForce MX150, 8550U, SanDisk X600 SD9SN8W-128G
23 fps ∼74%
Bas Moyen Élevé Ultra
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 2312fps
Far Cry 5 (2018) 3112109fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 331311fps

Degré de la nuisance sonore

Au repos
32.7 / 32.7 / 32.7 dB(A)
Disque dur
33.4 dB(A)
Fortement sollicité
42.9 / 45 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencieux
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
bruyant
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (à 15 cm de distance)   environment noise: 30.5 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.633.635.135.733.62533.431.536.335.833.43141.539.135.537.541.54032.834.131.131.532.85035.135.330.736.635.16328.829.829.327.628.88032.632.431.127.232.610034.333.533.925.134.312526.626.625.225.826.616025.924.823.724.325.920023.523.923.523.123.525023.223.222.222.723.231523.223.122.121.723.240024.424.721.220.724.450024.825.320.42024.863026.426.62119.826.480028.528.720.218.628.5100030.630.822.818.230.6125030.530.322.717.930.5160032.332.421.517.832.3200032.832.921.517.532.8250035.135.319.917.635.1315034.134.120.217.934.1400028.928.919.41828.9500029.329.518.818.129.3630028.428.618.518.128.480002323.118.518.2231000020.620.518.418.120.61250019.11918.31819.11600018.718.418.318.118.7SPL42.94332.730.642.9N3.83.81.61.33.8median 26.6median 26.6median 21median 18.2median 26.6Delta3.63.81.723.645.933.132.930.731.745.943.933.633.129.529.543.941.136.434.832.330.241.132.532.332.129.129.332.531.130.33129.629.831.128.628.927.926.727.728.627.127.927.426.726.127.125.926.725.525.125.925.925.126.624.324.324.625.12425.123.624.123.82423.824.823.2232223.824.625.12321.620.924.627.628.724.621.121.327.625.52723.621.222.125.530.331.425.719.418.930.329.831.225.21918.329.828.729.622.418.518.228.731.132.522.517.91831.1293120.717.417.42927.630.219.617.517.427.626.828.919.917.417.426.826.529.119.617.517.426.525.82819.11817.525.824.226.718.918.117.924.228.330.919.318.41828.323.626.818.918.918.423.622.224.41918.818.722.220.321.81919.118.920.319.720.419.319.21919.719.919.819.519.819.419.939.341.33330.630.439.333.51.71.31.33median 25.8median 27median 20.7median 19median 18.7median 25.82.22.22.51.622.232.228.933.533.126.729.131.931.533.233.931.633.131.631.829.33331.329.630.831.82627.526.227.826.824.625.828.825.125.627.326.823.32423.625.424.423.723.325.222.722.421.82521.722.721.323.620.821.620.325.520.222.919.428.319.722.118.929.118.721.218.429.919.321.217.527.819.220.217.42620.522.217.126.31922.216.828.318.420.916.627.818.121.116.727.818.820.316.928.518.823.217.428.218.219.317.632.21818.517.826.51818.317.823.317.81817.921.817.917.917.819.917.817.917.718.83133.129.7401.51.91.33.5median 19median 21.2median 17.8median 26.51.71.71.62.233.631.628.131.231.132.533.228.529.129.629.329.130.33032.231.231.130.83030.529.529.931.129.527.226.828.82829.727.226.326.326.225.72626.526.125.124.72626.625.926252525.525.724.823.924.6252423.925.225.125.12323.323.824.123.324.522.222.722.62422.823.421.521.322.422.921.720.920.820.720.422.220.620.320.320.218.921.422.420.521.119.718.12222.319.621.619.117.722.321.519.520.21916.721.523.119.92219.716.723.225.220.624.422.116.125.527.723.627.12415.727.229.42327.122.915.929.328.822.126.923.315.928.128.320.525.720.715.928.12920.126.921.116.328.524.718.422.318.616.624.32017.619.217.916.919.918.417.618.317.717.218.31817.818.318.117.2181818.218.518.917.317.91918.520.521.217.418.638.232.836.533.229382.61.82.31.81.22.6median 23.1median 20.5median 22median 20.7median 17.2median 23.22.42.42.61.91.72.2hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP Pavilion 14-ce0002ngHuawei MateBook X Pro, i7Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKBLenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
 34.7 °C48.2 °C49.2 °C 
 27.4 °C42 °C44.5 °C 
 25.2 °C25.6 °C31.3 °C 
Maximum: 49.2 °C
Moyenne: 36.5 °C
40 °C47 °C32.7 °C
40.2 °C30.5 °C26 °C
29.3 °C27.7 °C26 °C
Maximum: 47 °C
Moyenne: 33.3 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  49 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 23.4 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 30.9 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.2 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 36.5 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 38.8 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.8 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 30.9 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.3 °C / 88.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29.1 °C / 84.4 F (-2.2 °C / -3.9 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.635.734.62534.835.834.83135.837.535.84031.231.531.25036.236.636.2633027.6308031.927.231.910034.325.134.312530.725.830.716028.624.328.620031.123.131.125048.922.748.931556.321.756.340064.720.764.750065.72065.763066.519.866.580061.818.661.8100065.518.265.5125068.217.968.2160069.917.869.9200069.617.569.6250068.917.668.9315067.217.967.2400067.81867.8500064.518.164.5630065.618.165.6800066.118.266.11000065.118.165.11250061.91861.9160005318.153SPL79.230.679.2N42.91.342.9median 65.1median 18.2median 65.1Delta8.528.531.431.731.43529.53531.730.231.729.829.329.830.929.830.92927.72934.926.134.941.925.941.948.324.648.348.723.848.745.82245.858.120.958.164.721.364.769.522.169.570.218.970.265.318.365.363.118.263.167.71867.765.217.465.266.917.466.967.217.467.266.917.466.966.317.566.362.617.962.661.71861.76218.46262.818.762.856.218.956.258.31958.347.519.447.577.530.477.540.81.340.8median 62.8median 18.7median 62.86.326.333.533.431.930.231.636.129.331.930.831.826.229.825.830.127.327.823.630.323.341.921.854.621.36420.365.719.465.318.961.118.459.417.567.417.465.917.161.916.863.216.665.816.76516.967.417.46117.670.317.866.817.869.317.967.517.860.617.754.229.778.11.344.8median 17.8median 641.65.831.129.529.328.631.13131.130.129.727.12624.726.623.725.724.923.928.623.837.922.645.822.451.720.454.818.956.618.16617.772.116.774.416.770.816.161.615.761.915.961.715.959.115.95816.364.216.668.516.968.117.260.917.26017.358.217.454.42978.91.242.9median 17.2median 601.75.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Pavilion 14-ce0002ngHuawei MateBook X Pro, i7Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKBLenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (69.94 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.19 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.18 / 0.4 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 6.3 / 8.4 / 10.2 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 59 / 66.3 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng
8550U, GeForce MX150, SanDisk X600 SD9SN8W-128G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7
8550U, GeForce MX150, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, LTPS, 3000x2000, 13.9
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB
8550U, GeForce MX150, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG), IPS, 2560x1440, 14
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
8550U, GeForce MX150, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 2560x1440, 14
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
8550U, GeForce MX150, SanDisk SD8SN8U512G1002, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
8550U, GeForce MX150, SK hynix PC401 NVMe 500 GB, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150
 
Average of class Multimedia
 
Power Consumption
19%
23%
10%
29%
-14%
10%
-58%
Idle Minimum *
6.3
4.7
25%
3.9
38%
3.4
46%
3
52%
5.3
16%
4.48 (2.2 - 11.6, n=45)
29%
11.6 (2.1 - 101, n=918)
-84%
Idle Average *
8.4
8.7
-4%
5.76
31%
7.5
11%
5.8
31%
9.8
-17%
7.88 (5 - 13.8, n=45)
6%
16.2 (4.2 - 122, n=918)
-93%
Idle Maximum *
10.2
9.8
4%
7.14
30%
10.8
-6%
6.2
39%
12.6
-24%
9.76 (6.2 - 14.7, n=45)
4%
19.7 (4.7 - 181, n=918)
-93%
Load Average *
59
39.4
33%
50.8
14%
55.4
6%
54.1
8%
73
-24%
54.7 (33 - 75, n=44)
7%
59.9 (18.5 - 164, n=897)
-2%
Load Maximum *
66.3
40.4
39%
65.8
1%
70.3
-6%
56.4
15%
80
-21%
63.5 (40.4 - 89.2, n=45)
4%
77.9 (20.1 - 329, n=902)
-17%
Witcher 3 ultra *
34
45.9
67.6

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
Au repos (module WiFi éteint, luminosité au minimum)
13h 17min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
6h 54min
En lecture de Big Buck Bunny encodé en H.264 1080p
5h 50min
Fortement sollicité (luminosité au maximum)
2h 25min
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng
8550U, GeForce MX150, 41 Wh
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7
8550U, GeForce MX150, 57 Wh
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB
8550U, GeForce MX150, 45 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad T480s-20L8S02E00
8550U, GeForce MX150, 57 Wh
Asus Zenbook UX430UN
8550U, GeForce MX150, 50 Wh
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
8550U, GeForce MX150, 84 Wh
Average of class Multimedia
 
Autonomie de la batterie
25%
5%
27%
11%
20%
-26%
Reader / Idle
797
1160
46%
881
11%
1366
71%
1039
30%
927
16%
400 (73 - 2085, n=878)
-50%
H.264
350
428
22%
550
57%
349 (114 - 915, n=102)
0%
WiFi v1.3
414
506.3
22%
520
26%
530
28%
560
35%
625
51%
355 (96 - 942, n=234)
-14%
Load
145
157
8%
85
-41%
76
-48%
98
-32%
135
-7%
85.2 (32 - 238, n=878)
-41%

Points positifs

+ châssis premium au design moderne
+ châssis rigide et finitions réussies
+ lecteur d'empreintes digitales ultra rapide

Points négatifs

- écran médiocre à bien des niveaux
- écran illisible au soleil
- maintenance difficile
- lecteur de carte SD lent
- mauvaise gestion de la chauffe
En test : le HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par HP Allemagne.
En test : le HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par HP Allemagne.

Le nouveau HP Pavilion 14 est un appareil multimédia abordable mais réussi équipé d’un processeur Intel Core i7-8550U et d’une carte graphique Nvidia GeForce MX150. Notre appareil ici testé possède des performances globales acceptables, mais un peu gâchées par son SSD SanDisk lent. Point positif, l’appareil ne subit pas de throttling. Malgré cela, le Pavilion 14 ne peut concurrencer les performances graphiques des autres appareils équipés de GeForce MX150 ; l’IdeaPad 530s atteint des fréquences jusqu’à 50 % supérieures dans les tests de jeu.

Le plus gros point faible du nouveau HP Pavilion 14 est indiscutablement son écran. Malgré sa finition matte, sa luminosité maximale de 239 cd/m² le rend inutilisable par jour ensoleillé.

De plus, notre appareil de test gère mal la chauffe : il chauffe tout simplement trop pour un portable multimédia, surtout au vu de ses performances de jeu et graphiques modestes. Et les ventilateurs sont très bruyants, alors qu’ils ne refroidissent pas bien l’appareil. Le système de refroidissement n’est pas à la hauteur de sa tâche, s’avérant insuffisant pour un Core i7-8550U et une GeForce MX150.

Le Pavilion 14 est mieux adapté pour des usages classiques et de bureautique, pour lesquels il est assez performant, alors qu’il est plus élégant que la plupart de ses concurrents. Cela dit, nous recommandons de jeter un œil au Pavilion 15 équipé d’une AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, qui possède un meilleur écran et un système de refroidissement plus efficace. Il coûte également 200 € de moins, mais il faudra composer avec l'absence de carte graphique dédiée et avec un système un peu moins performant.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng - 10/07/2018 v6
Daniel Puschina

Châssis
79 / 98 → 80%
Clavier
72%
Dispositif de pointage
88%
Connectivité
49 / 81 → 60%
Poids
67 / 20-67 → 99%
Autonomie
87%
Écran
83%
Performances en jeu
74 / 85 → 87%
Performances dans les applications
87 / 92 → 94%
Chauffe
90%
Nuisance sonore
79 / 95 → 83%
Audio
60%
Appareil photo
34 / 85 → 40%
Moyenne
73%
82%
Multimedia - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Courte critique du PC portable HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng (i7-8550U, MX150, FHD)
Daniel Puschina, 2018-10-15 (Update: 2018-10-15)