Notebookcheck

Courte critique du PC portable Schenker Slim 15 RED (i5-8265U, UHD620, FHD)

Mike Wobker, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, Andrea Grüblinger (traduit par Prévots), 03/13/2019

De rouge vêtu. Schenker continue à essayer le concept d’appareils configurables, et ajoute un peu de couleurs à cet essai. Se différenciant des châssis toujours plus gris, le Slim 15 RED Edition avec un processeur Whiskey Lake, un SSD Samsung et 16 Go de RAM est prometteur arbore un rouge vif. Dans notre test, nous verrons ce que l’on peut en attendre, et quelles sont les options disponibles.

Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
Processeur
Intel Core i5-8265U
Carte graphique
Mémoire
16384 Mo 
, double canal
Écran
15.6 pouces 16:9, 2 x 1 pixel 141 PPP, Chi Mei CMN15E8, IPS, brillant: non
Carte mère
Intel Cannon Lake-U PCH-LP Premium
Disque dur
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB, 500 Go 
, 450 Go libres
Carte son
Intel Cannon Lake-LP - cAVS
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Encoche de Sécurité Kensington, Connectique audio: 1 jack audio (écouteurs), 1 audio 2-en-1 (entrée micro + S/PDIF optique), Lecteur de cartes mémoires: 6-en-1
Réseau
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 19.9 x 360.4 x 244.5
Batterie
36 Wh Lithium-Ion
Système d'exploitation
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Appareil photo
Webcam: 0,9 MP, 16:9, 1280 x 720p
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: stéréo, Clavier: chiclet, Rétroéclairage du clavier: oui, adaptateur secteur, pilotes CD/USB sur clé USB, chiffon de nettoyage, 36 Mois Garantie
Poids
1.5 kg, Alimentation: 365 g
Prix
950 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19

Size comparison

379 mm 258 mm 23 mm 2 kg360.4 mm 244.5 mm 19.9 mm 1.5 kg359 mm 245 mm 17 mm 1.7 kg358 mm 230 mm 15.9 mm 999 g319 mm 199 mm 15.9 mm 1.2 kg
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
67.7 MB/s ∼100%
Average of class Office
  (10.2 - 191, n=256)
60.8 MB/s ∼90% -10%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
36 MB/s ∼53% -47%
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27.35 MB/s ∼40% -60%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
23.9 MB/s ∼35% -65%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
81.5 MB/s ∼100%
Average of class Office
  (9.5 - 255, n=231)
77.4 MB/s ∼95% -5%
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
28.95 MB/s ∼36% -64%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26.6 MB/s ∼33% -67%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
25.8 MB/s ∼32% -68%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
666 (min: 585, max: 685) MBit/s ∼100% +15%
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
652 MBit/s ∼98% +12%
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
647 (min: 493, max: 679) MBit/s ∼97% +12%
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
580 (min: 528, max: 648) MBit/s ∼87%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter
295 (min: 186, max: 388) MBit/s ∼44% -49%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
650 (min: 520, max: 667) MBit/s ∼100%
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
638 (min: 582, max: 695) MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
631 (min: 503, max: 648) MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter
568 (min: 553, max: 591) MBit/s ∼87% -13%
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
530 MBit/s ∼82% -18%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø580 (528-648)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø650 (520-667)
285
cd/m²
294
cd/m²
292
cd/m²
280
cd/m²
289
cd/m²
262
cd/m²
275
cd/m²
286
cd/m²
255
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 294 cd/m² Moyenne: 279.8 cd/m² Minimum: 18.3 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 87 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 289 cd/m²
Contraste: 803:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.93 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 3.73 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
87% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.42
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
Chi Mei CMN15E8, , 2x1, 15.6
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
TOS508F, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
LG Philips LP156WFA-SPG2, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
N156HCA-EAB, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
AU Optronics B140HAN03.2, , 1920x1080, 14
Response Times
-21%
-4%
-11%
-16%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
37 (18, 19)
44 (23, 21)
-19%
38 (19, 19)
-3%
37.2 (19.6, 17.6)
-1%
42 (21, 21)
-14%
Response Time Black / White *
24 (14, 10)
30 (19, 11)
-25%
25 (14, 11)
-4%
32.4 (18.4, 14)
-35%
28 (16, 12)
-17%
PWM Frequency
25000 (20)
20000 (90)
-20%
25770 (67)
3%
Screen
-9%
23%
-25%
-11%
Brightness middle
289
290
0%
341
18%
285.1
-1%
321
11%
Brightness
280
249
-11%
319
14%
271
-3%
282
1%
Brightness Distribution
87
78
-10%
87
0%
88
1%
77
-11%
Black Level *
0.36
0.38
-6%
0.31
14%
0.28
22%
0.2
44%
Contrast
803
763
-5%
1100
37%
1018
27%
1605
100%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.93
4.35
-11%
2.01
49%
4.38
-11%
6.35
-62%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.98
11.06
-58%
4.74
32%
24.07
-245%
12.2
-75%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.73
3.01
19%
2.01
46%
3.1
17%
8.35
-124%
Gamma
2.42 91%
2.44 90%
2.52 87%
2.24 98%
2.51 88%
CCT
6802 96%
7198 90%
6704 97%
6705 97%
8227 79%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
57
56
-2%
63
11%
40
-30%
59
4%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
87
86
-1%
98
13%
62
-29%
91
5%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.11
3.95
1.88
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
-15% / -11%
10% / 19%
-18% / -22%
-14% / -12%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
24 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 14 ms hausse
↘ 10 ms chute
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 32 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont similaires à la moyenne (25.4 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
37 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 18 ms hausse
↘ 19 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 32 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont similaires à la moyenne (40.6 ms) de tous les appareils testés.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) décelé 25000 Hz ≤ 20 Niveau de luminosité

Le rétroéclairage de l'écran scintille à la fréquence de 25000 Hz (certainement du fait de l'utilisation d'une MDI - Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) à un niveau de luminosité inférieur ou égal à 20 % . Aucun scintillement ne devrait être perceptible au-dessus de cette valeur.

La fréquence de rafraîchissement de 25000 Hz est élevée, la grande majorité des utilisateurs ne devrait pas percevoir de scintillements et être sujette à une fatigue oculaire accrue.

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9618 (minimum : 43 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660Tooltip
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19 Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel Core i5-8265U: Ø495 (488.96-585.22)
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110 Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø480 (477.83-508.65)
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6 Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i7-8565U: Ø441 (424.51-542.46)
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø492 (486.99-523.37)
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel Core i5-8265U: Ø504 (494.08-654.12)
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel Core i5-8265U; BIOS 204: Ø571 (557.17-647.21)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel Core i7-8565U
173 Points ∼79% +6%
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
Intel Core i5-8265U
163 Points ∼75%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U
  (126 - 163, n=16)
155 Points ∼71% -5%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
Intel Core i5-8265U
149 Points ∼68% -9%
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
Intel Core i5-8250U
144 Points ∼66% -12%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
Intel Core i5-8250U
139 Points ∼64% -15%
Average of class Office
  (20 - 181, n=506)
110 Points ∼50% -33%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
Intel Core i5-8265U
654 Points ∼15% +12%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
Intel Core i5-8265U
647 Points ∼15% +11%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U
  (483 - 750, n=18)
616 Points ∼14% +5%
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
Intel Core i5-8265U
585.2 Points ∼13%
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel Core i7-8565U
543 Points ∼12% -7%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
Intel Core i5-8250U
508 Points ∼12% -13%
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
Intel Core i5-8250U
490 Points ∼11% -16%
Average of class Office
  (36 - 1050, n=511)
330 Points ∼8% -44%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
163 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
585.2 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
56.95 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Aide
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2620 - 3210, n=13)
3009 Points ∼27% +1%
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
2992 Points ∼27%
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
2915 Points ∼26% -3%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
2902 Points ∼26% -3%
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG
2786 Points ∼25% -7%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
2778 Points ∼25% -7%
Average of class Office
  (320 - 3884, n=124)
2577 Points ∼23% -14%
Productivity
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
7050 Points ∼73% +14%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (5931 - 6556, n=13)
6213 Points ∼64% 0%
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
6202 Points ∼64%
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG
6069 Points ∼63% -2%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
5939 Points ∼61% -4%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
5505 Points ∼57% -11%
Average of class Office
  (1266 - 7964, n=124)
5400 Points ∼56% -13%
Essentials
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
8493 Points ∼80% +7%
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
7963 Points ∼75%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (7618 - 8395, n=13)
7935 Points ∼74% 0%
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG
7767 Points ∼73% -2%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
7618 Points ∼71% -4%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
7021 Points ∼66% -12%
Average of class Office
  (2683 - 8992, n=124)
6838 Points ∼64% -14%
Score
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
4006 Points ∼52% +6%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3573 - 3985, n=13)
3793 Points ∼49% 0%
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
3790 Points ∼49%
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG
3643 Points ∼47% -4%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
3643 Points ∼47% -4%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
3407 Points ∼44% -10%
Average of class Office
  (803 - 4597, n=125)
3188 Points ∼41% -16%
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
UHD Graphics 620, 8565U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
4093 Points ∼67% +19%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
3733 Points ∼61% +8%
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG
3585 Points ∼59% +4%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3150 - 4244, n=13)
3521 Points ∼58% +2%
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
3449 Points ∼57%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
3113 Points ∼51% -10%
Average of class Office
  (1169 - 4458, n=381)
3033 Points ∼50% -12%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3449 points
Aide
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
Average Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
 
Average of class Office
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-62%
-38%
-37%
-35%
5%
-48%
Write 4K
187.2
80.14
-57%
109.6
-41%
93.78
-50%
99.9
-47%
170 (150 - 187, n=4)
-9%
92.7 (0.217 - 204, n=129)
-50%
Read 4K
51.76
32.05
-38%
41.15
-20%
40.46
-22%
40.03
-23%
50.4 (48.3 - 52.4, n=4)
-3%
32.5 (0.176 - 166, n=129)
-37%
Write Seq
1438
505.4
-65%
746.8
-48%
804.2
-44%
973.1
-32%
1743 (1438 - 2092, n=4)
21%
664 (21.4 - 1895, n=130)
-54%
Read Seq
1347
527.9
-61%
1134
-16%
1677
24%
1111
-18%
1579 (1347 - 1758, n=4)
17%
973 (74 - 2827, n=130)
-28%
Write 4K Q32T1
396.7
204.9
-48%
321.5
-19%
201.8
-49%
424.6
7%
444 (352 - 550, n=4)
12%
264 (0.222 - 701, n=130)
-33%
Read 4K Q32T1
534.4
226.6
-58%
354
-34%
267
-50%
255.9
-52%
560 (498 - 648, n=4)
5%
283 (0.647 - 773, n=130)
-47%
Write Seq Q32T1
3280
532.7
-84%
871.8
-73%
669.3
-80%
1300
-60%
3251 (3216 - 3280, n=4)
-1%
825 (56.5 - 3280, n=130)
-75%
Read Seq Q32T1
3556
550.7
-85%
1639
-54%
2606
-27%
1723
-52%
3490 (3316 - 3556, n=4)
-2%
1577 (78.6 - 3560, n=130)
-56%
AS SSD
-86%
-44%
-62%
-56%
7%
-806%
Copy Game MB/s
699.9
301.11
549.22
988 (787 - 1178, n=3)
286 (17.5 - 1173, n=223)
Copy Program MB/s
327.12
233.52
246.84
389 (243 - 519, n=3)
172 (12.8 - 538, n=223)
Copy ISO MB/s
955.16
868.11
600.52
1839 (1693 - 2041, n=3)
453 (21.1 - 2151, n=223)
Score Total
4379
971
-78%
2384
-46%
1387
-68%
2048
-53%
5128 (4379 - 5862, n=4)
17%
1290 (21 - 4952, n=337)
-71%
Score Write
1902
284
-85%
932
-51%
415
-78%
815
-57%
2346 (1902 - 2668, n=4)
23%
422 (8 - 2668, n=337)
-78%
Score Read
1639
448
-73%
977
-40%
690
-58%
829
-49%
1844 (1510 - 2359, n=4)
13%
580 (6 - 2251, n=337)
-65%
Access Time Write *
0.023
0.046
-100%
0.033
-43%
0.051
-122%
0.028
-22%
0.0275 (0.023 - 0.034, n=4)
-20%
1.145 (0.021 - 34.1, n=365)
-4878%
Access Time Read *
0.046
0.129
-180%
0.06
-30%
0.114
-148%
0.0375 (0.033 - 0.046, n=4)
18%
1.593 (0.028 - 32, n=362)
-3363%
4K-64 Write
1493.75
156.1
-90%
736.88
-51%
271.59
-82%
605.06
-59%
1972 (1494 - 2280, n=4)
32%
273 (0.23 - 2280, n=366)
-82%
4K-64 Read
1314.05
366.77
-72%
788.31
-40%
431.26
-67%
652.98
-50%
1529 (1183 - 2050, n=4)
16%
430 (0.34 - 2072, n=366)
-67%
4K Write
166.01
78.8
-53%
124.83
-25%
88.45
-47%
130.83
-21%
139 (109 - 166, n=4)
-16%
72.4 (0.21 - 182, n=366)
-56%
4K Read
59.02
30.36
-49%
44.27
-25%
38.69
-34%
37.3
-37%
55.6 (50.2 - 59, n=4)
-6%
29.3 (0.4 - 112, n=366)
-50%
Seq Write
2425.85
493.27
-80%
707.74
-71%
549.75
-77%
794.94
-67%
2349 (2081 - 2531, n=4)
-3%
468 (41.5 - 2531, n=367)
-81%
Seq Read
2660.99
512.88
-81%
1446.39
-46%
2205.34
-17%
1388.77
-48%
2598 (2429 - 2716, n=4)
-2%
790 (42.5 - 2773, n=367)
-70%
Moyenne finale (programmes/paramètres)
-74% / -76%
-41% / -41%
-50% / -51%
-46% / -47%
6% / 6%
-427% / -486%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
Sequential Read: 1448 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1429 MB/s
512K Read: 1460 MB/s
512K Write: 1492 MB/s
4K Read: 58.85 MB/s
4K Write: 116.4 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 311.1 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 231.8 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8565U
1866 Points ∼100% +2%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U
1851 Points ∼99% +1%
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U
1835 Points ∼98%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (1235 - 1979, n=139)
1700 Points ∼91% -7%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1672 Points ∼90% -9%
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1547 Points ∼83% -16%
Average of class Office
  (185 - 5332, n=628)
1266 Points ∼68% -31%
3DMark 11 Performance
2042 points
Aide
BioShock Infinite
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
10.82 fps ∼100%
Average of class Office
  (1.8 - 54.8, n=233)
10.5 fps ∼97% -3%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
9.9 fps ∼91% -9%
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
9.4 fps ∼87% -13%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (4.5 - 16, n=120)
8.99 fps ∼83% -17%
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
7 fps ∼65% -35%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
4.5 fps ∼42% -58%
1366x768 High Preset
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
33.91 fps ∼100%
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
33.5 fps ∼99% -1%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
31 fps ∼91% -9%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (8.1 - 34.5, n=128)
26.8 fps ∼79% -21%
Average of class Office
  (6.23 - 128, n=325)
26.4 fps ∼78% -22%
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
19 fps ∼56% -44%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
8.1 fps ∼24% -76%
1366x768 Medium Preset
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
40.46 fps ∼100%
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
39.9 fps ∼99% -1%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
36.7 fps ∼91% -9%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (11.5 - 45.5, n=128)
32 fps ∼79% -21%
Average of class Office
  (7.18 - 145, n=345)
30.5 fps ∼75% -25%
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
21 fps ∼52% -48%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
11.5 fps ∼28% -72%
1280x720 Very Low Preset
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
78.49 fps ∼100%
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
76.5 fps ∼97% -3%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
67.4 fps ∼86% -14%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (18.3 - 81.7, n=128)
59.6 fps ∼76% -24%
Average of class Office
  (12.2 - 204, n=347)
54.4 fps ∼69% -31%
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
47 fps ∼60% -40%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
18.3 fps ∼23% -77%
Bas Moyen Élevé Ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 78.4940.4633.9110.82fps

Degré de la nuisance sonore

Au repos
30.4 / 30.4 / 31.6 dB(A)
Fortement sollicité
44.8 / 44.8 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencieux
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
bruyant
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (à 15 cm de distance)   environment noise: 30.4 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.535.232.333.5254749.935.7473158.56634.958.54035.443.531.535.45032.833.630.932.86334.530.93034.58027.728.225.727.710028.628.524.728.612526.224.925.126.216024.9242424.920025.825.122.125.825025.825.32225.831528.4292128.440026.226.519.726.250027.127.118.727.163028.228.518.928.280030.430.518.130.4100031.632.217.631.6125030.632.117.430.6160029.529.817.329.5200033.63417.533.6250034.434.617.534.4315035.536.117.835.5400035.536.518.135.5500032.53318.432.5630032.232.618.532.2800028.628.918.628.61000024.72518.724.71250022.62318.722.61600020.420.518.920.4SPL44.44530.444.4N4.44.71.24.4median 28.6median 28.9median 18.7median 28.6Delta3.23.71.93.2hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseSchenker Slim 15-RE-E19
 30.9 °C40.3 °C37.3 °C 
 28.5 °C36.6 °C32.3 °C 
 23.5 °C25.4 °C26.6 °C 
Maximum: 40.3 °C
Moyenne: 31.3 °C
41.4 °C45 °C34.8 °C
33.6 °C47.1 °C30.4 °C
23.1 °C25.3 °C23.7 °C
Maximum: 47.1 °C
Moyenne: 33.8 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  44.1 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 21.7 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.3 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 29.4 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.1 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 36.4 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.7 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 29.4 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.6 °C / 79.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (+1.6 °C / 2.9 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.632.335.62533.735.733.73138.934.938.9403331.5335032.830.932.86328.33028.38028.525.728.510027.324.727.312526.925.126.916024.62424.620023.522.123.525029.12229.131535.32135.340041.719.741.750044.118.744.163048.618.948.680058.218.158.2100065.917.665.9125064.317.464.3160062.917.362.9200062.617.562.6250055.717.555.7315056.617.856.6400059.218.159.2500059.318.459.3630058.818.558.880005718.6571000050.118.750.11250050.918.750.91600053.118.953.1SPL72.430.472.4N24.91.224.9median 53.1median 18.7median 53.1Delta10.21.910.235.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSchenker Slim 15-RE-E19Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (65.89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 94% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 93% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 3.9 / 0.76 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 3.2 / 6.5 / 11.3 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 32 / 42.2 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing 1.3
Asus Zenbook 14 UX433FA-A6018T
8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh
563 min ∼14% +110%
Acer Swift 5 SF515-51T-76B6
8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 53.9 Wh
430 min ∼11% +60%
Average of class Office
  (105 - 964, n=321)
408 min ∼10% +52%
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh
391 min ∼10% +46%
Toshiba Tecra A50-E-110
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh
291 min ∼7% +9%
Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19
8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 36 Wh
268 min ∼7%
Autonomie
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
4h 28min

Points positifs

+ maintenance
+ performances globales
+ design modern
+ Wifi

Points négatifs

- bruyant en cas de sollicitations
- contraste de l'écran
- boutons de souris mous

Verdict

En test : le Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19. Modèle de test fourni par Schenker Technologies.
En test : le Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19. Modèle de test fourni par Schenker Technologies.

Le Schenker Slim 15 RED Edition s’avère avoir de bonnes performances pour la bureautique. Le SSD rapide combiné à un processeur moderne permet d’obtenir de bonnes performances globales, tandis que la mémoire vive et le GPU intégré offres des performances 3D acceptables.

Dans la configuration testée ici, le Slim 15 obtient de bons résultats. Il faudra garder un œil sur les composants choisis lors de la configuration de la machine, pour obtenir les mêmes scores.

Il faut en particulier faire attention à la RAM, celle-ci ayant un gros impact sur les performances graphiques. Le stockage doit également être choisi soigneusement, les performances globales pouvant être assez fortement impactées. Mais dans tous les cas on aura le même contraste réduit et la mauvaise autonomie. Si vous pouvez composer avec ces défauts, alors le Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19 peut être un bon portable pour la bureautique sur le long terme.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Schenker Slim 15-RE-E19 - 03/21/2019 v6
Mike Wobker

Châssis
82 / 98 → 83%
Clavier
82%
Dispositif de pointage
83%
Connectivité
61 / 80 → 76%
Poids
69 / 20-67 → 100%
Autonomie
78%
Écran
81%
Performances en jeu
60 / 68 → 88%
Performances dans les applications
87 / 92 → 94%
Chauffe
92%
Nuisance sonore
82%
Audio
50%
Appareil photo
35 / 85 → 42%
Moyenne
72%
83%
Office - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Courte critique du PC portable Schenker Slim 15 RED (i5-8265U, UHD620, FHD)
Mike Wobker, 2019-03-13 (Update: 2019-03-13)