Notebookcheck

Courte critique du Samsung Galaxy A70 : un géant du milieu de gamme en test

Attaque de grande envergure. Triple capteur photo 32 MP, 128 Go de stockage, batterie de 4 500 mAh, et un écran de 6,7 pouces : Samsung est en train de redéfinir le smartphone du milieu de gamme avec son dernier Galaxy A70, qui peut presque être pris pour un appareil premium. Découvrez dans notre rapport de test si le smartphone à 400 $ vaut le coup ou non.
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduit par Prévots), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Samsung Galaxy A70 (Galaxy A70 Gamme)
Processeur
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 8 x 1.6 - 2 GHz, Kryo 460 Gold (Cortex-A76) / Silver (Cortex-A55)
Carte graphique
Qualcomm Adreno 612
Mémoire
6144 Mo 
, LPDDR4X, 1 866 MHz
Écran
6.70 pouces 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 393 PPP, capacitif, Super AMOLED, FHD+, 16 million de couleurs , Gorilla Glass 3, brillant: oui
Disque dur
128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 128 Go 
, 106.9 Go libres
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, Connectique audio: 3,5 mm via adaptateur USB C, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: micro SD jusqu'à 512 Go (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: gyroscope, accéléromètre, capteur géomagnétique, capteur à effet Hall, capteur de proximité, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3, VoLTE, VoWi-Fi, Wi-Fi Direct
Réseau
802.11a/b/g (a/b/g), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850, 900, 1 800, 1 900 MHz), 3G (850, 900, 1 900, 2 100 MHz), LTE Cat.11 (B1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41), réception/envoi jusqu'à 600 / 75 MBit/s, Dual-SIM, DAS (tête) : 0,349 W/kg, DAS (corps) : 1,475 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 7.9 x 164.3 x 76.7
Batterie
4500 mAh Lithium-Ion, Autonomie de la batterie en communication 3G (selon les données du fabricant): 28 h
Système d'exploitation
Android 9.0 Pie
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 32 MPix triple capteur photo: grand-angle 32 MP (1 / 2,8"/f1,7), appareil photo bokeh 5 MP (1 / 5,0"/f2,2), ultra-grand-angle 8 MP (1 / 4.0"/F2,2), autofocus, zoom optique x8, stabilisateur vidéo, vidéos jusqu'en 4K et 30 FPS
Appareil photo secondaire: 32 MPix 1 / 2,8", f/2,0, grand-angle, éclairage pour selfie
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: mono dirigé vers le bas, Clavier: virtuel, adaptateur secteur modulaire, câble USB (Type-C vers Type-C), adaptateur jack vers USB C, écouteurs, outil pour carte SIM, Android 9, One UI 1.1, 24 Mois Garantie, fanless
Poids
183 g, Alimentation: 35 g
Prix
399 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

, , , , , ,
relation de la recherche.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Comparaison des tailles

167 mm 73 mm 8.3 mm 180 g164.3 mm 76.7 mm 7.9 mm 183 g159.5 mm 75 mm 8.1 mm 184 g159.8 mm 76.8 mm 7.5 mm 168 g152.9 mm 72.7 mm 7.4 mm 159 g147.5 mm 70.5 mm 7.45 mm 155 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=303, last 2 years)
415 MBit/s ∼100% +57%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash
320 (164min - 362max) MBit/s ∼77% +21%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P60, 128 GB eMMC Flash
308 (302min - 312max) MBit/s ∼74% +17%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Adreno 616, SD 712, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
279 (229min - 303max) MBit/s ∼67% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Adreno 612, SD 675, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
264 (221min - 293max) MBit/s ∼64%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
218 (95min - 239max) MBit/s ∼53% -17%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
153 (133min - 180max) MBit/s ∼37% -42%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=303, last 2 years)
419 MBit/s ∼100% +24%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Adreno 612, SD 675, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
338 (302min - 356max) MBit/s ∼81%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P60, 128 GB eMMC Flash
335 (267min - 343max) MBit/s ∼80% -1%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
317 (163min - 343max) MBit/s ∼76% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Adreno 616, SD 712, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
311 (214min - 346max) MBit/s ∼74% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash
279 (265min - 284max) MBit/s ∼67% -17%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
188 (45min - 237max) MBit/s ∼45% -44%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340343336341356351334351352339337345329350327343344339324302315339332330340319343350332337342343336341356351334351352339337345329350327343344339324302315339332330340319343350332337342251260276221252253265277257267258273252271271276243293242261275270266273264276280269262269Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø337 (302-356)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø264 (221-293)
GPS Samsung Galaxy A70 : vue générale.
GPS Samsung Galaxy A70 : vue générale.
GPS Samsung Galaxy A70 : lac.
GPS Samsung Galaxy A70 : lac.
GPS Samsung Galaxy A70 : virages.
GPS Samsung Galaxy A70 : virages.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 : vue générale.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 : vue générale.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 : lac.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 : lac.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 : virages.
GPS Garmin Edge 500 : virages.

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Cliquer pour charger les images
545
cd/m²
552
cd/m²
551
cd/m²
551
cd/m²
554
cd/m²
556
cd/m²
555
cd/m²
551
cd/m²
557
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 557 cd/m² Moyenne: 552.4 cd/m² Minimum: 1.72 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 98 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 554 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.3 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 3.4 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
98% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.08
Samsung Galaxy A70
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.70
Huawei P30 Lite
IPS LCD, 2312x1080, 6.15
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
IPS, 2520x1080, 6.50
Wiko View 3 Pro
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.30
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 5.97
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 6.00
Screen
15%
-33%
-25%
23%
30%
Brightness middle
554
451
-19%
572
3%
459
-17%
583
5%
570
3%
Brightness
552
430
-22%
580
5%
450
-18%
577
5%
565
2%
Brightness Distribution
98
90
-8%
96
-2%
90
-8%
97
-1%
93
-5%
Black Level *
0.55
0.4
0.39
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.3
1.4
58%
4.5
-36%
4.8
-45%
1.6
52%
1.5
55%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.2
4.4
52%
12.2
-33%
9.2
-0%
3.9
58%
3.6
61%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.4
2.5
26%
7.9
-132%
5.5
-62%
2.7
21%
1.2
65%
Gamma
2.08 106%
2.22 99%
2.16 102%
2.26 97%
2.27 97%
2.07 106%
CCT
6606 98%
6422 101%
8726 74%
7494 87%
6267 104%
6504 100%
Contrast
820
1430
1177

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) décelé 240.4 Hz ≤ 99 Niveau de luminosité

Le rétroéclairage de l'écran scintille à la fréquence de 240.4 Hz (certainement du fait de l'utilisation d'une MDI - Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) à un niveau de luminosité inférieur ou égal à 99 % . Aucun scintillement ne devrait être perceptible au-dessus de cette valeur.

La fréquence de rafraîchissement de 240.4 Hz est relativement faible, les personnes les plus sensibles devraient percevoir un scintillement et être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire accrue (avec le niveau de luminosité indiqué)

En comparaison, 52 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 14825 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 2500000) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
4 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 2 ms hausse
↘ 2 ms chute
L'écran montre de très faibles temps de réponse, parfait pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (24 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
4 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 2 ms hausse
↘ 2 ms chute
L'écran montre de très faibles temps de réponse, parfait pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (38.1 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
2380 Points ∼91%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1544 Points ∼59% -35%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1346 Points ∼51% -43%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1487 Points ∼57% -38%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1875 Points ∼72% -21%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1525 Points ∼58% -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (2266 - 2380, n=2)
2323 Points ∼89% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (412 - 5099, n=69, last 2 years)
2615 Points ∼100% +10%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
6446 Points ∼81%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5429 Points ∼68% -16%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4804 Points ∼61% -25%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
5743 Points ∼72% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
5975 Points ∼75% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4429 Points ∼56% -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (5998 - 6446, n=2)
6222 Points ∼78% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1163 - 14895, n=69, last 2 years)
7940 Points ∼100% +23%
Compute RenderScript Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
6104 Points ∼84%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
3551 Points ∼49% -42%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4278 Points ∼59% -30%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
5309 Points ∼73% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
7282 Points ∼100% +19%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4026 Points ∼55% -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (5466 - 6104, n=2)
5785 Points ∼79% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2166 - 12228, n=60, last 2 years)
6821 Points ∼94% +12%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
9288 Points ∼86%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
8125 Points ∼76% -13%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
7181 Points ∼67% -23%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
10757 Points ∼100% +16%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
8346 Points ∼78% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5625 Points ∼52% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (9288 - 9522, n=3)
9371 Points ∼87% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2689 - 19989, n=223, last 2 years)
9982 Points ∼93% +7%
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
7315 Points ∼93%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6483 Points ∼82% -11%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6018 Points ∼76% -18%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
7486 Points ∼95% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
6832 Points ∼87% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5387 Points ∼68% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (7315 - 7950, n=4)
7660 Points ∼97% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=267, last 2 years)
7878 Points ∼100% +8%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
23013 Points ∼57%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
18377 Points ∼46% -20%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
22323 Points ∼55% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
29316 Points ∼73% +27%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
15167 Points ∼38% -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (22767 - 26910, n=4)
24192 Points ∼60% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2920 - 117606, n=207, last 2 years)
40247 Points ∼100% +75%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
26348 Points ∼45%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
21643 Points ∼37% -18%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
21847 Points ∼38% -17%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
43514 Points ∼75% +65%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
15567 Points ∼27% -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (26320 - 30180, n=4)
27396 Points ∼47% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2177 - 224130, n=207, last 2 years)
58049 Points ∼100% +120%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
15948 Points ∼66%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
12023 Points ∼50% -25%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
24165 Points ∼100% +52%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
13686 Points ∼57% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
13914 Points ∼58% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (15461 - 19511, n=4)
17199 Points ∼71% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8324 - 59268, n=207, last 2 years)
23323 Points ∼97% +46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1606 Points ∼48%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1414 Points ∼42% -12%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1469 Points ∼44% -9%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1755 Points ∼52% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2073 Points ∼62% +29%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
960 Points ∼28% -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (1606 - 1989, n=4)
1740 Points ∼52% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=260, last 2 years)
3369 Points ∼100% +110%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1427 Points ∼36%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1256 Points ∼32% -12%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1327 Points ∼34% -7%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1593 Points ∼40% +12%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1980 Points ∼50% +39%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
845 Points ∼21% -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (1427 - 1814, n=4)
1601 Points ∼41% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=260, last 2 years)
3943 Points ∼100% +176%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
2869 Points ∼100%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2490 Points ∼87% -13%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2349 Points ∼82% -18%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2720 Points ∼95% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2480 Points ∼86% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1829 Points ∼64% -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (1708 - 3000, n=4)
2580 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 5301, n=260, last 2 years)
2756 Points ∼96% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1734 Points ∼44%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1494 Points ∼38% -14%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1536 Points ∼39% -11%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1784 Points ∼45% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2217 Points ∼56% +28%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1071 Points ∼27% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (1621 - 2047, n=4)
1785 Points ∼45% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=276, last 2 years)
3948 Points ∼100% +128%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1571 Points ∼32%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1336 Points ∼27% -15%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1397 Points ∼28% -11%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1605 Points ∼32% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2146 Points ∼43% +37%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
954 Points ∼19% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (1571 - 1878, n=4)
1669 Points ∼33% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 22052, n=276, last 2 years)
4986 Points ∼100% +217%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
2727 Points ∼93%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2578 Points ∼88% -5%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2352 Points ∼80% -14%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2924 Points ∼100% +7%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2506 Points ∼86% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1871 Points ∼64% -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (1657 - 2984, n=4)
2433 Points ∼83% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5784, n=274, last 2 years)
2908 Points ∼99% +7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
978 Points ∼37%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
963 Points ∼37% -2%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
946 Points ∼36% -3%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1141 Points ∼43% +17%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2073 Points ∼79% +112%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
741 Points ∼28% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (937 - 1175, n=4)
1015 Points ∼39% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=258, last 2 years)
2629 Points ∼100% +169%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
823 Points ∼30%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
819 Points ∼29% 0%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
808 Points ∼29% -2%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
986 Points ∼35% +20%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1980 Points ∼71% +141%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
634 Points ∼23% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (823 - 1000, n=4)
869 Points ∼31% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=258, last 2 years)
2786 Points ∼100% +239%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
2886 Points ∼100%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2489 Points ∼86% -14%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2351 Points ∼81% -19%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2528 Points ∼88% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2480 Points ∼86% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1821 Points ∼63% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (1724 - 3026, n=4)
2551 Points ∼88% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=258, last 2 years)
2802 Points ∼97% -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1110 Points ∼35%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
981 Points ∼31% -12%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1003 Points ∼31% -10%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1164 Points ∼36% +5%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2217 Points ∼69% +100%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
737 Points ∼23% -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (1057 - 1274, n=4)
1135 Points ∼36% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=274, last 2 years)
3193 Points ∼100% +188%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
949 Points ∼27%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
843 Points ∼24% -11%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
862 Points ∼24% -9%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
993 Points ∼28% +5%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2146 Points ∼60% +126%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
629 Points ∼18% -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (851 - 1094, n=4)
962 Points ∼27% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 12914, n=274, last 2 years)
3570 Points ∼100% +276%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
2719 Points ∼92%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2550 Points ∼86% -6%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2345 Points ∼79% -14%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2918 Points ∼99% +7%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2506 Points ∼85% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1845 Points ∼62% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (1684 - 3011, n=4)
2448 Points ∼83% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5793, n=274, last 2 years)
2959 Points ∼100% +9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1063 Points ∼40%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
944 Points ∼36% -11%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1152 Points ∼44% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1988 Points ∼75% +87%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (1038 - 1189, n=4)
1089 Points ∼41% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (426 - 6977, n=215, last 2 years)
2636 Points ∼100% +148%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
914 Points ∼31%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
809 Points ∼27% -11%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
997 Points ∼34% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1907 Points ∼64% +109%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (914 - 1029, n=4)
943 Points ∼32% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 11259, n=215, last 2 years)
2959 Points ∼100% +224%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
2482 Points ∼94%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2282 Points ∼86% -8%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2518 Points ∼95% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2338 Points ∼88% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (1952 - 2605, n=4)
2341 Points ∼88% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1786 - 4061, n=215, last 2 years)
2651 Points ∼100% +7%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
37 fps ∼64%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
31 fps ∼53% -16%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
30 fps ∼52% -19%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
34 fps ∼59% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
58 fps ∼100% +57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (37 - 37, n=2)
37 fps ∼64% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=215, last 2 years)
57 fps ∼98% +54%
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
41 fps ∼39%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
33 fps ∼31% -20%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
35 fps ∼33% -15%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
38 fps ∼36% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
74 fps ∼70% +80%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (41 - 41, n=2)
41 fps ∼39% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 322, n=215, last 2 years)
106 fps ∼100% +159%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
19 fps ∼42%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
16 fps ∼36% -16%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
13 fps ∼29% -32%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
19 fps ∼42% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
33 fps ∼73% +74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (19 - 19, n=2)
19 fps ∼42% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 120, n=213, last 2 years)
45 fps ∼100% +137%
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
20 fps ∼32%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
17 fps ∼27% -15%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
16 fps ∼26% -20%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
20 fps ∼32% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
36 fps ∼58% +80%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (20 - 21, n=2)
20.5 fps ∼33% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 180, n=214, last 2 years)
62 fps ∼100% +210%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
13 fps ∼37%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
11 fps ∼31% -15%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
8.4 fps ∼24% -35%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
11 fps ∼31% -15%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
24 fps ∼68% +85%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (8.4 - 13, n=2)
10.7 fps ∼30% -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=212, last 2 years)
35.4 fps ∼100% +172%
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
15 fps ∼35%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
12 fps ∼28% -20%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
10 fps ∼24% -33%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
12 fps ∼28% -20%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
26 fps ∼61% +73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (14 - 15, n=2)
14.5 fps ∼34% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 121, n=212, last 2 years)
42.5 fps ∼100% +183%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
7 fps ∼32%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.5 fps ∼29% -7%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.1 fps ∼23% -27%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
6.8 fps ∼31% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
13 fps ∼59% +86%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (7 - 7.1, n=2)
7.05 fps ∼32% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 61, n=211, last 2 years)
22.2 fps ∼100% +217%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
8 fps ∼31%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.9 fps ∼27% -14%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6.3 fps ∼25% -21%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
7.4 fps ∼29% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
15 fps ∼59% +88%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (8 - 8.2, n=2)
8.1 fps ∼32% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 75, n=211, last 2 years)
25.5 fps ∼100% +219%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
8 fps ∼36%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.4 fps ∼29% -20%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4.9 fps ∼22% -39%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
7 fps ∼32% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
14 fps ∼63% +75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (8 - 8.9, n=4)
8.38 fps ∼38% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=280, last 2 years)
22.2 fps ∼100% +178%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
9 fps ∼35%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7 fps ∼27% -22%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6.1 fps ∼24% -32%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
7.5 fps ∼29% -17%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
16 fps ∼63% +78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (9 - 9.9, n=4)
9.28 fps ∼36% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=279, last 2 years)
25.6 fps ∼100% +184%
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
4.7 fps ∼32%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4.2 fps ∼28% -11%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
3.2 fps ∼22% -32%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
4.3 fps ∼29% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
9.1 fps ∼61% +94%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (3.1 - 5.2, n=4)
4.48 fps ∼30% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=280, last 2 years)
14.8 fps ∼100% +215%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
3 fps ∼30%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2.6 fps ∼26% -13%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2.2 fps ∼22% -27%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2.7 fps ∼27% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
5.8 fps ∼57% +93%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (3 - 4.8, n=4)
3.53 fps ∼35% +18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=279, last 2 years)
10.1 fps ∼100% +237%
Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
7.52 fps ∼24%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
14.18 (8.4min - 36.6max) fps ∼46% +89%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
7.52 fps ∼24% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.44 - 71.6, n=14, last 2 years)
31.1 fps ∼100% +314%
Vulkan Medium Native (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
6.56 fps ∼27%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
12.76 (7.68min - 27.7max) fps ∼52% +95%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
6.56 fps ∼27% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.65 - 63, n=14, last 2 years)
24.7 fps ∼100% +277%
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
8.51 fps ∼31%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
14.23 (8.05min - 26.52max) fps ∼52% +67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
8.51 fps ∼31% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.73 - 85.6, n=18, last 2 years)
27.2 fps ∼100% +220%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
167836 Points ∼66%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
132834 Points ∼52% -21%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
117574 Points ∼46% -30%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
138589 Points ∼54% -17%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
179353 Points ∼70% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
122826 Points ∼48% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (159646 - 167836, n=2)
163741 Points ∼64% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65996 - 462516, n=18, last 2 years)
255787 Points ∼100% +52%
VRMark - Amber Room (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1262 Score ∼39%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1966 Score ∼60% +56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
1262 Score ∼39% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 7649, n=57, last 2 years)
3256 Score ∼100% +158%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
2756 Points ∼76%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2201 Points ∼61% -20%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1734 Points ∼48% -37%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1933 Points ∼53% -30%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2906 Points ∼80% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2009 Points ∼55% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (2756 - 2860, n=2)
2808 Points ∼77% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (323 - 6959, n=198, last 2 years)
3625 Points ∼100% +32%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
6137 Points ∼92%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5146 Points ∼78% -16%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4342 Points ∼65% -29%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
3915 Points ∼59% -36%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
5932 Points ∼89% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4506 Points ∼68% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (5940 - 6137, n=2)
6039 Points ∼91% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 14189, n=198, last 2 years)
6635 Points ∼100% +8%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
3285 Points ∼77%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
3036 Points ∼72% -8%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1236 Points ∼29% -62%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1958 Points ∼46% -40%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2969 Points ∼70% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2445 Points ∼58% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (3285 - 4068, n=2)
3677 Points ∼87% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (522 - 9044, n=198, last 2 years)
4241 Points ∼100% +29%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
2272 Points ∼40%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1478 Points ∼26% -35%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1611 Points ∼29% -29%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1590 Points ∼28% -30%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
3453 Points ∼62% +52%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1356 Points ∼24% -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (2272 - 2278, n=2)
2275 Points ∼41% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 16996, n=198, last 2 years)
5613 Points ∼100% +147%
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1259 Points ∼99%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1024 Points ∼81% -19%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1046 Points ∼82% -17%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1146 Points ∼90% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1172 Points ∼92% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1090 Points ∼86% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
  (1216 - 1259, n=2)
1238 Points ∼97% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2169, n=198, last 2 years)
1272 Points ∼100% +1%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
322 Points ∼26%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
517 Points ∼41% +61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
322 Points ∼26% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (242 - 3575, n=58, last 2 years)
1260 Points ∼100% +291%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 161, n=184, last 2 years)
50 Points ∼100% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (43.4 - 44.9, n=2)
44.2 Points ∼88% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A70 (Chrome 74.0.3729.157)
43.423 Points ∼87%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
37.214 Points ∼74% -14%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
31.781 Points ∼64% -27%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)
25.96 Points ∼52% -40%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 196, n=165, last 2 years)
50.7 runs/min ∼100% +22%
Samsung Galaxy A70 (Chrome 74.0.3729.157)
41.4 runs/min ∼82%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
41.4 runs/min ∼82% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
37.5 runs/min ∼74% -9%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
31.7 runs/min ∼63% -23%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)
27.4 runs/min ∼54% -34%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Samsung Galaxy A70 (Chrome 74.0.3729.157)
82 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 194, n=202, last 2 years)
78 Points ∼95% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (70 - 82, n=2)
76 Points ∼93% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
72 Points ∼88% -12%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
66 Points ∼80% -20%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
57 Points ∼70% -30%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)
54 Points ∼66% -34%
Wiko View 3 Pro (Chrome 74)
53 Points ∼65% -35%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 58632, n=209, last 2 years)
17325 Points ∼100% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A70 (Chrome 74.0.3729.157)
15716 Points ∼91%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (15689 - 15716, n=2)
15703 Points ∼91% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
13562 Points ∼78% -14%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
9779 Points ∼56% -38%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
9165 Points ∼53% -42%
Wiko View 3 Pro (Chrome 74)
8778 Points ∼51% -44%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)
8163 Points ∼47% -48%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)
4739 ms * ∼100% -69%
Wiko View 3 Pro (Chrome 74)
4447.6 ms * ∼94% -58%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
4137.8 ms * ∼87% -47%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
4122.8 ms * ∼87% -47%
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 29635, n=211, last 2 years)
3999 ms * ∼84% -42%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
2911.8 ms * ∼61% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (2807 - 2890, n=2)
2848 ms * ∼60% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A70 (Chrome 74.0.3729.157)
2806.8 ms * ∼59%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Samsung Galaxy A70Huawei P30 LiteSony Xperia 10 PlusWiko View 3 ProXiaomi Mi 9 SESamsung Galaxy A7 2018 Average 128 GB UFS 2.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
37%
-13%
-3%
2%
-21%
58%
99%
Sequential Read 256KB
508.48
293.23
-42%
280.34
-45%
302.74
-40%
492.48
-3%
295.76
-42%
511 (409 - 941, n=29)
0%
752 (41.9 - 2037, n=285, last 2 years)
48%
Sequential Write 256KB
193.97
158.63
-18%
205.19
6%
171.57
-12%
190.1
-2%
104.87
-46%
209 (143 - 466, n=29)
8%
327 (11.9 - 1321, n=285, last 2 years)
69%
Random Read 4KB
103.8
71.57
-31%
77.67
-25%
89.67
-14%
115.83
12%
83.98
-19%
127 (88.4 - 173, n=29)
22%
134 (13.5 - 325, n=285, last 2 years)
29%
Random Write 4KB
21.95
87.29
298%
16.77
-24%
31.2
42%
21.86
0%
15.45
-30%
96 (13.5 - 187, n=29)
337%
120 (4.97 - 330, n=285, last 2 years)
447%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
76.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
76.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
83.92 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
10%
77.38 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
2%
78.15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
68.3 (30.2 - 86, n=20)
-10%
75.9 (13.4 - 154, n=175, last 2 years)
0%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
58.78 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
67.85 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
15%
58.44 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
60.51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
3%
64.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
10%
53.2 (28.6 - 70.2, n=20)
-9%
58.2 (8.4 - 83.3, n=175, last 2 years)
-1%
Asphalt 9 (High)
05101520918181515232116161414151617151516131211121516151515151415141515141415161717171616161716151716161616161616161716161616161716161616161716161616171517161616161716161616161716161616161616151714161515161615161617161516151415141414141311101013141314151315131113131413141314121312131212121413151814191818Tooltip
; 1.5.4a: Ø15.2 (9-23)
Asphalt 9 (Standard)
0510152025202928241718202021182120181717161717202021202020202021212123202017152117171717171717171717161717171616172021232222212117161819191919182020181918191918211819192020202218202020192019202125232322242223222322242323252218181918191819181818191819171918192020141921202120212120212019182621Tooltip
; 1.5.4a: Ø19.6 (14-29)
Shadow Fight 3
051015202530354045505560126060605960606059606059606059606060596060596060605960605960606058606054596060596060596060605960605960605860606059606059606060596060595960596060605960605960606059606059606060596060596060605960605960606059606059605660596060596060605960605960605960605659606059Tooltip
; 1.18.5: Ø59.2 (12-60)
Dead Trigger 2
05101520253035404550556030605960606059606060596060605960606059606060596060605960606060596060605960606059606060596060605960606059606060605960606059606060596060605960606059606060596060605960606059606060596060605960606060596060605960606059606060596060605960606059606060596060605960606059606060596060605960606059606060Tooltip
; 1.5.5: Ø59.6 (30-60)
 37.4 °C37 °C33.4 °C 
 36.9 °C34.8 °C32.6 °C 
 36.3 °C36.2 °C33 °C 
Maximum: 37.4 °C
Moyenne: 35.3 °C
32.4 °C34.2 °C35.5 °C
31.8 °C33.1 °C36 °C
32.1 °C33.3 °C36 °C
Maximum: 36 °C
Moyenne: 33.8 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  27.4 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.833.82525.532.53127.524.44022.328.45028.532.66318.925.78020.224.910021.621.412518.718.916020.232.520017.136.725014.646.331515.955.640015.459.150016.56263014.264.280014.569.6100013.368.7125013.469.8160013.672.3200014.271.6250014.672315013.673.7400014.477500014.574.4630014.275.8800014.677.21000014.874.61250014.967.31600015.258.3SPL26.585.3N0.861.5median 14.6median 68.7Delta0.811.330.733.82528.726.828.426.328.729.838.227.424.72123.219.525.818.825.719.240.417.641.316.947.415.855.51556.71562.814.766.914.86814.666.514.369.213.471.814.472.514.473.214.876.61577.714.875.314.774.31575.314.972.815.264.515.755.126.885.50.961.4median 15median 66.91.210.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy A70Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy A70 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.01 / 0.14 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 0.66 / 1.69 / 1.8 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 3.42 / 5.88 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Samsung Galaxy A70
4500 mAh
Huawei P30 Lite
3340 mAh
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
3000 mAh
Wiko View 3 Pro
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
3070 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
3300 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-36%
-14%
0%
22%
-11%
-6%
-24%
Idle Minimum *
0.66
0.91
-38%
0.68
-3%
0.77
-17%
0.53
20%
0.71
-8%
0.693 (0.66 - 0.73, n=3)
-5%
0.934 (0.37 - 2.5, n=234, last 2 years)
-42%
Idle Average *
1.69
2.41
-43%
2.12
-25%
1.79
-6%
1.18
30%
1.36
20%
1.8 (1.54 - 2.17, n=3)
-7%
1.843 (0.65 - 3.94, n=234, last 2 years)
-9%
Idle Maximum *
1.8
2.43
-35%
2.17
-21%
1.86
-3%
1.2
33%
1.47
18%
1.867 (1.57 - 2.23, n=3)
-4%
2.1 (0.69 - 4.2, n=234, last 2 years)
-17%
Load Average *
3.42
4.57
-34%
3.82
-12%
2.74
20%
3.04
11%
5.13
-50%
4.03 (3.42 - 4.56, n=3)
-18%
4.46 (2.1 - 8.4, n=234, last 2 years)
-30%
Load Maximum *
5.88
7.57
-29%
6.44
-10%
5.53
6%
4.83
18%
7.89
-34%
5.63 (5.22 - 5.88, n=3)
4%
7.24 (3.16 - 12.3, n=234, last 2 years)
-23%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
Au repos (module WiFi éteint, luminosité au minimum)
43h 20min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12h 16min
En lecture de Big Buck Bunny encodé en H.264 1080p
18h 37min
Fortement sollicité (luminosité au maximum)
3h 53min
Samsung Galaxy A70
4500 mAh
Huawei P30 Lite
3340 mAh
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
3000 mAh
Wiko View 3 Pro
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
3070 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
3300 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie
-34%
-33%
20%
-27%
-18%
Reader / Idle
2600
1248
-52%
1400
-46%
1374
-47%
1467
-44%
H.264
1117
685
-39%
701
-37%
853
-24%
836
-25%
WiFi v1.3
736
515
-30%
635
-14%
886
20%
510
-31%
605
-18%
Load
233
198
-15%
154
-34%
218
-6%
273
17%

Points positifs

+ robuste et fin
+ jack 3,5 mm
+ double SIM, VoLTE, VoWIFI, LTE Cat. 11
+ GPS honnête
+ stockage interne 128 Go
+ Wifi rapide
+ écran Super AMOLED lumineux
+ autonomie
+ chargeur rapide

Points négatifs

- pas de certification IP
- triple capteur au mieux médiocre
- MLI
- performances de jeu
- throttling en cas de sollicitations
En test : le Samsung Galaxy A70. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par notebooksbilliger.de.
En test : le Samsung Galaxy A70. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par notebooksbilliger.de.

Le Galaxy A70 de Samsung est un smartphone honnête. Il a cependant du mal à se distinguer de la foule de ses concurrents du milieu de gamme, malgré ses composants impressionnants.

Sa finesse et son grand écran 20:9 de 6,7 pouces Super AMOLED sont très certainement de bons arguments, tout comme sa connectivité, son autonomie, la possibilité de double SIM et son stockage internet généreux.

Des composants excellents avec des performances et des photos médiocres : nous en attendons plus d’un smartphone à 400 $.

Nous en voilà aux défauts de l’A70 : ses performances sont suffisantes pour le quotidien, mais elles ne suffiront pas pour les jeux actuels. A ce tarif de presque 400 $, nous en attendions plus de l’A70. Son triple capteur photo est également quelque peu décevant, parce qu’il ne s’avère suffisant que dans les environnements lumineux.

Une bonne alternative au Samsung Galaxy A70 est le Mi 9 SE de Xiaomi. Avec son écran AMOLED de 5,97 pouces, il est peut-être un peu plus petit, mais il est moins cher, plus puissant, et possède un meilleur triple capteur photo.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Samsung Galaxy A70 - 06/14/2019 v6(old)
Manuel Masiero

Châssis
85%
Clavier
67 / 75 → 90%
Dispositif de pointage
88%
Connectivité
40 / 60 → 67%
Poids
90%
Autonomie
97%
Écran
86%
Performances en jeu
50 / 63 → 80%
Performances dans les applications
68 / 70 → 97%
Chauffe
91%
Nuisance sonore
100%
Audio
65 / 91 → 71%
Appareil photo
76%
Moyenne
77%
86%
Smartphone - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Finn D. Boerne
Editor of the original article: Finn D. Boerne - Translator - 424 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Courte critique du Samsung Galaxy A70 : un géant du milieu de gamme en test
Manuel Masiero, 2019-06-17 (Update: 2019-06-17)