Notebookcheck

Courte critique du smartphone Huawei P30 Lite

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduit par Prévots), 05/22/2019

Chef-d'oeuvre de la photographie en milieu de gamme ? Le smartphone à succès du 3e trimestre 2018 est déjà renouvelé. Huawei vente les capacités photographiques du P30 Lite, équipé d’un triple capteur "révolutionnaire". Découvrez dans ce rapport de test si ce capteur photo de 48 MP est capable de redéfinir la photographie des smartphones du milieu de gamme.

Huawei P30 Lite (P Gamme)
Processeur
HiSilicon Kirin 710
Carte graphique
ARM Mali-G51 MP4
Mémoire
4096 Mo 
Écran
6.15 pouces 19.27:9, 2312 x 1080 pixel 415 PPP, capacitif, IPS LCD, brillant: oui
Disque dur
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 Go 
, 108 Go libres
Connexions
1 USB 2.0, Connectique audio: 3,5 mm, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: micro SD jusqu'à 512 Go, 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: capteur de proximité, accéléromètre, boussole, gyroscope, à effet hall, OTG, Miracast, LED de statut
Réseau
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, 4G LTE TDD : B38, 4G LTE FDD : B1 / B3 / B4 / B7 / B7 / B8 / B20, 3G WCDMA : B1 / B2 / B2 / B4 / B5 / B8, 2G : B2 / B3 / B5 / B8, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Taille
Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 7.4 x 152.9 x 72.7
Batterie
3340 mAh Lithium-Polymère, Autonomie de la batterie en communication 3G (selon les données du fabricant): 21 h
Système d'exploitation
Android 9.0 Pie
Appareil photo
Appareil photo primaire: 48 MPix 48 MP (grand-angle, f/1,8) + 8 MP (ultra-grand-angle) + 2 MP (bokeh), appareil photo2 API : Limitée
Appareil photo secondaire: 24 MPix 24 MP, f/2,0
Fonctionnalités additionnelles
Haut-parleurs: mono, Clavier: virtuel, écouteurs, chargeur, câble USB, outil pour carte SIM, guide de démarrage rapide, protection d'écran, carte de garantie, EMUI 9.0, 24 Mois Garantie, DAS (tête) : 1,23 W/kg, DAS (corps) : 1,19 W/kg, LTE Cat. 12 (600 / 100 Mbit/s), DRM Widevine : L1., fanless
Poids
159 g, Alimentation: 54 g
Prix
369 euros
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Test du Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone.
Test du Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone.
Test du Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone.
Test du Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone.
Test du Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone.
Test du Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone.
Test du Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone.
Test du Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone.
Test du Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone.
Test du Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone.
Test du Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone.
Test du Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone.

Comparaison des tailles

158.5 mm 74.7 mm 7.7 mm 166 g157 mm 75.3 mm 8.3 mm 176 g156 mm 68 mm 8.4 mm 162 g155.5 mm 75.2 mm 8.8 mm 182 g154.8 mm 75.8 mm 8 mm 180 g154.9 mm 74.8 mm 7.6 mm 175 g152.9 mm 72.7 mm 7.4 mm 159 g147.5 mm 70.5 mm 7.45 mm 155 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
675 (min: 630, max: 704) MBit/s ∼100% +259%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
491 (min: 444, max: 499) MBit/s ∼73% +161%
Sony Xperia 10
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
334 (min: 326, max: 341) MBit/s ∼49% +78%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
332 (min: 314, max: 341) MBit/s ∼49% +77%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
312 (min: 273, max: 341) MBit/s ∼46% +66%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Adreno 616, 712, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
311 (min: 214, max: 346) MBit/s ∼46% +65%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
294 (min: 278, max: 302) MBit/s ∼44% +56%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=390)
222 MBit/s ∼33% +18%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
188 (min: 45, max: 237) MBit/s ∼28%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
647 (min: 598, max: 665) MBit/s ∼100% +197%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
429 (min: 256, max: 448) MBit/s ∼66% +97%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
300 (min: 169, max: 367) MBit/s ∼46% +38%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
288 (min: 138, max: 294) MBit/s ∼45% +32%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Adreno 616, 712, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
279 (min: 229, max: 303) MBit/s ∼43% +28%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
272 (min: 250, max: 285) MBit/s ∼42% +25%
Sony Xperia 10
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
253 (min: 128, max: 283) MBit/s ∼39% +16%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
218 (min: 95, max: 239) MBit/s ∼34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=390)
213 MBit/s ∼33% -2%
GPS Garmin Edge 500.
GPS Garmin Edge 500.
GPS Garmin Edge 500.
GPS Garmin Edge 500.
GPS Garmin Edge 500.
GPS Garmin Edge 500.
GPS Huawei P30 Lite.
GPS Huawei P30 Lite.
GPS Huawei P30 Lite.
GPS Huawei P30 Lite.
GPS Huawei P30 Lite.
GPS Huawei P30 Lite.
Huawei P30 Lite - Mode photo.
Mode photo.
Huawei P30 Lite - Mode grand-angle.
Mode grand-angle.
Huawei P30 Lite - Zoom x2.
Zoom x2.
Huawei P30 Lite - Mode ouverture.
Mode ouverture.
Huawei P30 Lite - Paramètres.
Test du Huawei P30 Lite.
Test du Huawei P30 Lite.
Test du Huawei P30 Lite.
Test du Huawei P30 Lite.

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Cliquer pour charger les images
Huawei P30 Lite - Mire de test.
Huawei P30 Lite - Mire de test zoomée.
412
cd/m²
456
cd/m²
441
cd/m²
418
cd/m²
451
cd/m²
428
cd/m²
414
cd/m²
426
cd/m²
427
cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 456 cd/m² Moyenne: 430.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.05 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 90 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 451 cd/m²
Contraste: 820:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.55 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Huawei P30 Lite
IPS LCD, 2312x1080, 6.15
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 5.97
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
IPS, 2270x1080, 6.2
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
IPS, 2246x1080, 6.18
Xiaomi Mi 8
AMOLED, 2248x1080, 6.21
Samsung Galaxy A50
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4
Nokia 8.1
IPS, 2246x1080, 6.18
Sony Xperia 10
IPS-LCD, 2520x1080, 6
Screen
10%
-79%
-21%
-63%
-18%
-40%
-37%
Brightness middle
451
583
29%
537
19%
489
8%
430
-5%
644
43%
567
26%
547
21%
Brightness
430
577
34%
525
22%
486
13%
434
1%
628
46%
547
27%
525
22%
Brightness Distribution
90
97
8%
85
-6%
93
3%
94
4%
91
1%
92
2%
93
3%
Black Level *
0.55
0.58
-5%
0.34
38%
0.61
-11%
0.36
35%
Contrast
820
926
13%
1438
75%
930
13%
1519
85%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.4
1.6
-14%
6.41
-358%
3.8
-171%
5.09
-264%
2.64
-89%
4.39
-214%
4.6
-229%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.4
3.9
11%
10.86
-147%
7.1
-61%
8.05
-83%
9.23
-110%
7.28
-65%
12.1
-175%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.5
2.7
-8%
6.7
-168%
4.4
-76%
3.3
-32%
2.5
-0%
4.9
-96%
3.9
-56%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2.27 97%
2.099 105%
2.22 99%
2.257 97%
2.024 109%
2.248 98%
2.17 101%
CCT
6422 101%
6267 104%
8310 78%
7213 90%
7026 93%
6649 98%
7642 85%
7158 91%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.
Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) non décelé

En comparaison, 51 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 9580 (minimum : 43 - maximum : 142900) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.
       Temps de réponse noir à blanc
31.2 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 14.8 ms hausse
↘ 16.4 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 79 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (25.3 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
       Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
54.4 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées↗ 26 ms hausse
↘ 28.4 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu.
En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.9 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 89 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances.
Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (40.4 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
3551 Points ∼25%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
7282 Points ∼51% +105%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4287 Points ∼30% +21%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14369 Points ∼100% +305%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
13371 Points ∼93% +277%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4913 Points ∼34% +38%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
6813 Points ∼47% +92%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
3763 Points ∼26% +6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (3133 - 4083, n=7)
3579 Points ∼25% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=290)
4547 Points ∼32% +28%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5429 Points ∼59%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
5975 Points ∼65% +10%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4992 Points ∼54% -8%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
9182 Points ∼100% +69%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8907 Points ∼97% +64%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5605 Points ∼61% +3%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
5856 Points ∼64% +8%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
3986 Points ∼43% -27%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (5266 - 5615, n=7)
5469 Points ∼60% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=344)
4481 Points ∼49% -17%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1544 Points ∼63%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1875 Points ∼76% +21%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1337 Points ∼54% -13%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2468 Points ∼100% +60%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2430 Points ∼98% +57%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1721 Points ∼70% +11%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1799 Points ∼73% +17%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
837 Points ∼34% -46%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1523 - 1614, n=7)
1565 Points ∼63% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (437 - 4824, n=345)
1331 Points ∼54% -14%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6483 Points ∼80%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
6832 Points ∼84% +5%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6277 Points ∼77% -3%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8101 Points ∼100% +25%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7983 Points ∼99% +23%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5827 Points ∼72% -10%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
6887 Points ∼85% +6%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
5987 Points ∼74% -8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (5803 - 7141, n=7)
5466 Points ∼67% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3227 - 10450, n=339)
4917 Points ∼61% -24%
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
8125 Points ∼84%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
8346 Points ∼86% +3%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
7618 Points ∼79% -6%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
9664 Points ∼100% +19%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
9689 Points ∼100% +19%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
7029 Points ∼73% -13%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
8309 Points ∼86% +2%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4948 Points ∼51% -39%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (7004 - 9017, n=7)
7978 Points ∼82% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4290 - 14439, n=507)
5361 Points ∼55% -34%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2338 Points ∼92%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
2167 Points ∼86%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
 
2272 Points ∼90%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2103 - 15735, n=31)
2534 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1907 Points ∼76%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
693 Points ∼28%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
 
1121 Points ∼45%
Average of class Smartphone
  (914 - 14536, n=31)
2504 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
Points ∼0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1988 Points ∼90%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
861 Points ∼39%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1263 - 1263, n=2)
632 Points ∼29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1063 - 14786, n=33)
2206 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2550 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2506 Points ∼98% -2%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2257 Points ∼89% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2215 Points ∼87% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2266 Points ∼89% -11%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2534 Points ∼99% -1%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1664 Points ∼65% -35%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1851 - 2702, n=8)
2309 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=354)
1812 Points ∼71% -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
843 Points ∼19%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2146 Points ∼48% +155%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4468 Points ∼100% +430%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4471 Points ∼100% +430%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1188 Points ∼27% +41%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1845 Points ∼41% +119%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
792 Points ∼18% -6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (470 - 1194, n=8)
820 Points ∼18% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=354)
1556 Points ∼35% +85%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
981 Points ∼27%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2217 Points ∼60% +126%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3669 Points ∼100% +274%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3646 Points ∼99% +272%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1328 Points ∼36% +35%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1964 Points ∼54% +100%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
896 Points ∼24% -9%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (563 - 1351, n=8)
953 Points ∼26% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=357)
1452 Points ∼40% +48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2578 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2506 Points ∼88% -3%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2832 Points ∼100% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2181 Points ∼77% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2241 Points ∼79% -13%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2516 Points ∼89% -2%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1732 Points ∼61% -33%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1656 - 2697, n=8)
2333 Points ∼82% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4493, n=369)
1788 Points ∼63% -31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1336 Points ∼19%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2146 Points ∼31% +61%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6898 Points ∼100% +416%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5328 Points ∼77% +299%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1553 Points ∼23% +16%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2855 Points ∼41% +114%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1299 Points ∼19% -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (740 - 1336, n=8)
1195 Points ∼17% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=369)
2147 Points ∼31% +61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1494 Points ∼29%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2217 Points ∼42% +48%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5230 Points ∼100% +250%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4034 Points ∼77% +170%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1667 Points ∼32% +12%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2772 Points ∼53% +86%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1375 Points ∼26% -8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (844 - 1494, n=8)
1339 Points ∼26% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 7980, n=370)
1826 Points ∼35% +22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2489 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2480 Points ∼98% 0%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2528 Points ∼100% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2137 Points ∼85% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2351 Points ∼93% -6%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2514 Points ∼99% +1%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1645 Points ∼65% -34%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1924 - 2716, n=8)
2425 Points ∼96% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4262, n=430)
1741 Points ∼69% -30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
819 Points ∼17%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1980 Points ∼42% +142%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4746 Points ∼100% +479%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4010 Points ∼84% +390%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1149 Points ∼24% +40%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1702 Points ∼36% +108%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
704 Points ∼15% -14%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (457 - 819, n=8)
720 Points ∼15% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=432)
1284 Points ∼27% +57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
963 Points ∼24%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2073 Points ∼52% +115%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3972 Points ∼100% +312%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3356 Points ∼84% +248%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1296 Points ∼33% +35%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1834 Points ∼46% +90%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
809 Points ∼20% -16%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (550 - 963, n=8)
853 Points ∼21% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=440)
1229 Points ∼31% +28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2490 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2480 Points ∼91% 0%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2720 Points ∼100% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2124 Points ∼78% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2432 Points ∼89% -2%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2467 Points ∼91% -1%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1687 Points ∼62% -32%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1907 - 2645, n=8)
2409 Points ∼89% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4240, n=463)
1648 Points ∼61% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1256 Points ∼15%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1980 Points ∼24% +58%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8261 Points ∼100% +558%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6243 Points ∼76% +397%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1279 Points ∼15% +2%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2763 Points ∼33% +120%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1235 Points ∼15% -2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (568 - 1280, n=8)
1028 Points ∼12% -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=463)
1753 Points ∼21% +40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1414 Points ∼25%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2073 Points ∼36% +47%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5687 Points ∼100% +302%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4363 Points ∼77% +209%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1430 Points ∼25% +1%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2691 Points ∼47% +90%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1315 Points ∼23% -7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (673 - 1445, n=8)
1173 Points ∼21% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7673, n=471)
1503 Points ∼26% +6%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
12023 Points ∼34%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
13686 Points ∼39% +14%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
15766 Points ∼45% +31%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
34928 Points ∼100% +191%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
27858 Points ∼80% +132%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14353 Points ∼41% +19%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
14820 Points ∼42% +23%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
12437 Points ∼36% +3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (11158 - 17598, n=7)
13952 Points ∼40% +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8253 - 45072, n=622)
13486 Points ∼39% +12%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
21643 Points ∼26%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
43514 Points ∼53% +101%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
20953 Points ∼26% -3%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
82125 Points ∼100% +279%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
77203 Points ∼94% +257%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16593 Points ∼20% -23%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
39655 Points ∼48% +83%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
17878 Points ∼22% -17%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (12426 - 21643, n=7)
19666 Points ∼24% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3585 - 162695, n=622)
19503 Points ∼24% -10%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
18377 Points ∼29%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
29316 Points ∼46% +60%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
19525 Points ∼31% +6%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
63159 Points ∼100% +244%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
55397 Points ∼88% +201%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16037 Points ∼25% -13%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
28895 Points ∼46% +57%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
16290 Points ∼26% -11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (12120 - 20468, n=7)
17900 Points ∼28% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4164 - 83518, n=623)
16300 Points ∼26% -11%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
33 fps ∼22%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
74 fps ∼49% +124%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
36 fps ∼24% +9%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
150 fps ∼100% +355%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
120 fps ∼80% +264%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
39 fps ∼26% +18%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
65 fps ∼43% +97%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
29 fps ∼19% -12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (33 - 39, n=7)
37.4 fps ∼25% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=648)
34.1 fps ∼23% +3%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
31 fps ∼52%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
58 fps ∼97% +87%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
35 fps ∼58% +13%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +94%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +94%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
36 fps ∼60% +16%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
57 fps ∼95% +84%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
25 fps ∼42% -19%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (31 - 36, n=7)
34.7 fps ∼58% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=651)
26.4 fps ∼44% -15%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
17 fps ∼24%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
36 fps ∼51% +112%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
16 fps ∼23% -6%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
71 fps ∼100% +318%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
67 fps ∼94% +294%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23 fps ∼32% +35%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
32 fps ∼45% +88%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
13 fps ∼18% -24%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (17 - 21, n=7)
20.1 fps ∼28% +18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=567)
18.7 fps ∼26% +10%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
16 fps ∼28%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
33 fps ∼57% +106%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
15 fps ∼26% -6%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
58 fps ∼100% +263%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
56 fps ∼97% +250%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
21 fps ∼36% +31%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
31 fps ∼53% +94%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
11 fps ∼19% -31%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (16 - 19, n=7)
18.3 fps ∼32% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=572)
17.3 fps ∼30% +8%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
12 fps ∼26%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
26 fps ∼55% +117%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
10 fps ∼21% -17%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼74% +192%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
47 fps ∼100% +292%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14 fps ∼30% +17%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
23 fps ∼49% +92%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
9.5 fps ∼20% -21%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (12 - 14, n=7)
13.6 fps ∼29% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=429)
15.5 fps ∼33% +29%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
11 fps ∼20%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
24 fps ∼44% +118%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
9.8 fps ∼18% -11%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
54 fps ∼100% +391%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
45 fps ∼83% +309%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
13 fps ∼24% +18%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
22 fps ∼41% +100%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
7.8 fps ∼14% -29%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (11 - 13, n=7)
12.6 fps ∼23% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=432)
14.9 fps ∼28% +35%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4.2 fps ∼19%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
9.1 fps ∼41% +117%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2 fps ∼9% -52%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
22 fps ∼100% +424%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
22 fps ∼100% +424%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4.9 fps ∼22% +17%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
8.2 fps ∼37% +95%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
2.7 fps ∼12% -36%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (4 - 7, n=7)
4.51 fps ∼21% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=133)
8.98 fps ∼41% +114%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2.6 fps ∼19%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
5.8 fps ∼41% +123%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2.3 fps ∼16% -12%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14 fps ∼100% +438%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14 fps ∼100% +438%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
3.1 fps ∼22% +19%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
5 fps ∼36% +92%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1.7 fps ∼12% -35%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2.6 - 3.1, n=7)
2.67 fps ∼19% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=133)
6.19 fps ∼44% +138%
Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.4 fps ∼18%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
14 fps ∼40% +119%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.6 fps ∼16% -12%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
31 fps ∼89% +384%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼100% +447%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.2 fps ∼23% +28%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
13 fps ∼37% +103%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4.4 fps ∼13% -31%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (4.6 - 6.9, n=7)
6.04 fps ∼17% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=134)
13.4 fps ∼38% +109%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7 fps ∼21%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
16 fps ∼47% +129%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.4 fps ∼16% -23%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
32 fps ∼94% +357%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
34 fps ∼100% +386%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9 fps ∼26% +29%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
14 fps ∼41% +100%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4.9 fps ∼14% -30%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (4.6 - 7, n=7)
6.3 fps ∼19% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=133)
14.9 fps ∼44% +113%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.9 fps ∼20%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
15 fps ∼43% +117%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6.3 fps ∼18% -9%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼100% +407%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
26 fps ∼74% +277%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.9 fps ∼25% +29%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
13 fps ∼37% +88%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
5.3 fps ∼15% -23%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (6.9 - 7.7, n=7)
7.53 fps ∼22% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=358)
10.5 fps ∼30% +52%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.5 fps ∼20%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
13 fps ∼39% +100%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6 fps ∼18% -8%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
33 fps ∼100% +408%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
28 fps ∼85% +331%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.1 fps ∼25% +25%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
12 fps ∼36% +85%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4.3 fps ∼13% -34%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (6.4 - 6.8, n=7)
6.69 fps ∼20% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=362)
9.44 fps ∼29% +45%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
132834 Points ∼50%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
179353 Points ∼68% +35%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
117557 Points ∼45% -12%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
263165 Points ∼100% +98%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
144194 Points ∼55% +9%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
169262 Points ∼64% +27%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
88287 Points ∼34% -34%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (124870 - 140188, n=7)
133848 Points ∼51% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (138589 - 374820, n=251)
127380 Points ∼48% -4%
BaseMark OS II
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1024 Points ∼79%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1172 Points ∼90% +14%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1296 Points ∼100% +27%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1292 Points ∼100% +26%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
927 Points ∼72% -9%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1077 Points ∼83% +5%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
815 Points ∼63% -20%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (982 - 1212, n=7)
1098 Points ∼85% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=581)
731 Points ∼56% -29%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1478 Points ∼19%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
3453 Points ∼43% +134%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7945 Points ∼100% +438%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7895 Points ∼99% +434%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1957 Points ∼25% +32%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
3086 Points ∼39% +109%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1409 Points ∼18% -5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1450 - 1478, n=7)
1464 Points ∼18% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=581)
1890 Points ∼24% +28%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
3036 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2969 Points ∼89% -2%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3239 Points ∼97% +7%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3261 Points ∼98% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2492 Points ∼75% -18%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2947 Points ∼89% -3%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
983 Points ∼30% -68%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2823 - 4360, n=7)
3328 Points ∼100% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 6283, n=581)
1405 Points ∼42% -54%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5146 Points ∼78%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
5932 Points ∼90% +15%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6506 Points ∼98% +26%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6620 Points ∼100% +29%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5112 Points ∼77% -1%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
5681 Points ∼86% +10%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
3159 Points ∼48% -39%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (4826 - 5568, n=7)
5246 Points ∼79% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=581)
2790 Points ∼42% -46%
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2201 Points ∼57%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2906 Points ∼75% +32%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3838 Points ∼100% +74%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3852 Points ∼100% +75%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2193 Points ∼57% 0%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2731 Points ∼71% +24%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1374 Points ∼36% -38%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2140 - 2445, n=7)
2277 Points ∼59% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=585)
1384 Points ∼36% -37%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
37.214 Points ∼100% +17%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
31.781 Points ∼85%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (30.2 - 31.8, n=2)
31 Points ∼83% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (30.9 - 108, n=62)
29.6 Points ∼80% -7%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
16.254 Points ∼44% -49%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
37.5 runs/min ∼100% +18%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 123, n=59)
34.2 runs/min ∼91% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chome 73)
33.07 runs/min ∼88% +4%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
31.7 runs/min ∼85%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (31.2 - 31.7, n=2)
31.4 runs/min ∼84% -1%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)
83 Points ∼100% +26%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
72 Points ∼87% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
72 Points ∼87% +9%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
66 Points ∼80%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 161, n=115)
64.2 Points ∼77% -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (58 - 69, n=7)
62.3 Points ∼75% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
62 Points ∼75% -6%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
54 Points ∼65% -18%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
39 Points ∼47% -41%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)
15086 Points ∼100% +54%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)
14514 Points ∼96% +48%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
13562 Points ∼90% +39%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
12717 Points ∼84% +30%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
10322 Points ∼68% +6%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
9779 Points ∼65%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (9041 - 9779, n=7)
9435 Points ∼63% -4%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
8368 Points ∼55% -14%
Average of class Smartphone (3126 - 43280, n=642)
6100 Points ∼40% -38%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
4865 Points ∼32% -50%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=661)
10927 ms * ∼100% -164%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
10256.9 ms * ∼94% -148%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
4776 ms * ∼44% -15%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (3999 - 4310, n=7)
4181 ms * ∼38% -1%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
4137.8 ms * ∼38%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
3897 ms * ∼36% +6%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
3034.9 ms * ∼28% +27%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
2911.8 ms * ∼27% +30%
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)
2818 ms * ∼26% +32%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)
2713.6 ms * ∼25% +34%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Huawei P30 LiteXiaomi Mi 9 SEMotorola Moto G7 PlusXiaomi Pocophone F1Xiaomi Mi 8Samsung Galaxy A50Nokia 8.1Sony Xperia 10Average 128 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
19%
3%
18%
45%
6%
-13%
-11%
-6%
-36%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
67.85 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
62.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-8%
65.58 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
60.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-11%
58.27 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-14%
63.81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
65.3 (58.8 - 73.5, n=13)
-4%
48.2 (9.5 - 87.1, n=389)
-29%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
76.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
82.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
85.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
11%
73.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
84.65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
10%
83.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
77.6 (72.3 - 85.9, n=13)
1%
66.2 (8.1 - 96.5, n=389)
-14%
Random Write 4KB
87.29
21.86
-75%
73.1
-16%
17.81
-80%
21
-76%
18.2
-79%
7.3
-92%
14.39
-84%
31.6 (8.48 - 127, n=16)
-64%
19.2 (0.14 - 250, n=691)
-78%
Random Read 4KB
71.57
115.83
62%
76.6
7%
101.01
41%
136.3
90%
98.9
38%
69.9
-2%
53.12
-26%
77.5 (20.7 - 147, n=16)
8%
43.7 (1.59 - 175, n=691)
-39%
Sequential Write 256KB
158.63
190.1
20%
208.7
32%
155.57
-2%
207.8
31%
192.1
21%
203.8
28%
232.87
47%
173 (90 - 194, n=16)
9%
90.1 (2.99 - 392, n=691)
-43%
Sequential Read 256KB
293.23
492.48
68%
283.6
-3%
705.38
141%
693.2
136%
507.3
73%
279.3
-5%
273.8
-7%
331 (144 - 795, n=16)
13%
254 (12.1 - 1468, n=691)
-13%
Aspahlt 9 Legends
010203040Tooltip
; High Quality: Ø29.3 (20-31)
; Standard / low: Ø29.7 (26-31)
PUBG Compare
0102030Tooltip
; Smooth: Ø24.8 (23-26)
; Balanced: Ø24.7 (21-26)
; HD: Ø23.1 (16-26)
 41.5 °C41.5 °C38 °C 
 42.3 °C40 °C37.9 °C 
 40.7 °C40.8 °C38.3 °C 
Maximum: 42.3 °C
Moyenne: 40.1 °C
36.9 °C39.1 °C41.2 °C
35.3 °C38.5 °C42.9 °C
36 °C39.3 °C41.9 °C
Maximum: 42.9 °C
Moyenne: 39 °C
Alimentation (valeur maximale)  27.9 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.6 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.1 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.137.72527.425.93125.522.74024.529.15036.135.96326.125.38024.32410022.124.412519.122.116020.243.820019.449.225016.554.531515.158.840015.3615001461.163014.564.98001465.9100014.570.1125014.574.2160014.376.4200014.678.425001479.8315014.779.7400014.378500014.878.9630014.677.5800014.477.41000014.676.31250014.766.4160001559.5SPL26.788.9N0.873.3median 14.6median 66.4Delta1.512.432.53931.931.522.324.821.721.929.228.426.724.920.324.420.526.52325.315.64517.849.116.359.115.461.515.963.515.864.213.367.914.165.914.171.41469.713.567.813.46913.972.314.271.713.967.114.672.914.267.714.766.31568.214.955.415.33826.481.50.852.7median 14.7median 66.30.98.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei P30 LiteXiaomi Mi 9 SE
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei P30 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 14% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Mi 9 SE audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consommation énergétique
Éteint/en veilledarklight 0.01 / 0.24 Watts
Au reposdarkmidlight 0.91 / 2.41 / 2.43 Watts
Fortement sollicité midlight 4.57 / 7.57 Watts
 color bar
Légende: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei P30 Lite
3340 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
3070 mAh
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 8
3400 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A50
4000 mAh
Nokia 8.1
3500 mAh
Sony Xperia 10
2870 mAh
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
43%
1%
10%
-28%
8%
27%
20%
2%
16%
Idle Minimum *
0.91
0.53
42%
1.1
-21%
0.65
29%
1.5
-65%
0.8
12%
0.8
12%
0.72
21%
0.954 (0.8 - 1.3, n=8)
-5%
0.881 (0.2 - 3.4, n=723)
3%
Idle Average *
2.41
1.18
51%
1.7
29%
1.97
18%
2.2
9%
1.5
38%
1.5
38%
2.16
10%
2.18 (1.2 - 2.5, n=8)
10%
1.737 (0.6 - 6.2, n=722)
28%
Idle Maximum *
2.43
1.2
51%
2.1
14%
2.01
17%
2.6
-7%
1.7
30%
1.8
26%
2.17
11%
2.47 (2.2 - 3.6, n=8)
-2%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=723)
17%
Load Average *
4.57
3.04
33%
5.1
-12%
4.29
6%
6.1
-33%
5.9
-29%
3.2
30%
3.32
27%
4.5 (4.06 - 5, n=8)
2%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=717)
11%
Load Maximum *
7.57
4.83
36%
7.9
-4%
9.05
-20%
10.9
-44%
8.3
-10%
5.4
29%
5.34
29%
7.17 (6.13 - 7.86, n=8)
5%
5.86 (1.2 - 14.2, n=717)
23%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie
Au repos (module WiFi éteint, luminosité au minimum)
20h 48min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
8h 35min
En lecture de Big Buck Bunny encodé en H.264 1080p
11h 25min
Fortement sollicité (luminosité au maximum)
3h 18min
Huawei P30 Lite
3340 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
3070 mAh
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 8
3400 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A50
4000 mAh
Nokia 8.1
3500 mAh
Sony Xperia 10
2870 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie
11%
19%
43%
29%
32%
32%
-1%
Reader / Idle
1248
1374
10%
2088
67%
1634
31%
1587
27%
1682
35%
1006
-19%
H.264
685
853
25%
809
18%
936
37%
897
31%
869
27%
857
25%
620
-9%
WiFi v1.3
515
510
-1%
715
39%
808
57%
736
43%
701
36%
738
43%
541
5%
Load
198
218
10%
196
-1%
220
11%
215
9%
275
39%
246
24%
233
18%

Points positifs

+ design
+ qualité de construction
+ photographie
+ précision du GPS
+ calibrage de l'écran IPS
+ mémoire de 128 Go

Points négatifs

- stockage eMMC et non UFS
- vitesse Wifi
- nombre de bandes LTE
- Bluetooth 4.2
- contraste et luminosité de l'écran
- enregistrement vidéo seulement 1080p
- throttling
- performances du SoC en jeu
En test : le Huawei P30 Lite. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par Huawei Allemagne.
En test : le Huawei P30 Lite. Modèle de test aimablement fourni par Huawei Allemagne.

Tout comme son prédécesseur, le P30 Lite s’avère être un smartphone du milieu de gamme honnête et robuste, mais incapable de se distinguer de ses concurrents en ce qui concerne les performances ou la connectivité. Le suffixe Lite est clairement à sa place, à la différence d’autres appareils comme le Xiaomi Mi 9 SE. Pour ceux qui recherchent un appareil puissant et compétent pour le quotidien, nous conseillons plutôt de regarder du côté des nombreux concurrents Snapdragon.

Même s’il y a beaucoup de meilleurs smartphones du milieu de gamme disponibles, nous nous attendons à ce que le P30 Lite soit l’un des plus grands succès dans cette gamme de prix.

Le P30 Lite possède un design moderne, une très bonne qualité de construction, et un écran IPS avec de larges angles de vision et des couleurs fidèles. Les appareils photo, surtout le capteur 24 MP avant, sont plus que bons pour cette classe. Cependant, il y a trop de défauts mineurs qui gâchent l’ensemble, surtout quand on prend en compte le prix de vente conseillé par Huawei. Heureusement, le fabricant chinois s’est déjà avéré assez réactif, et a réduit au maximum les effets d’ajustement photographique basés sur la luminosité ambiante.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Huawei P30 Lite - 05/20/2019 v6
Marcus Herbrich

Châssis
86%
Clavier
65 / 75 → 87%
Dispositif de pointage
90%
Connectivité
45 / 60 → 76%
Poids
92%
Autonomie
92%
Écran
89%
Performances en jeu
46 / 63 → 73%
Performances dans les applications
64 / 70 → 92%
Chauffe
86%
Nuisance sonore
100%
Audio
66 / 91 → 73%
Appareil photo
70%
Moyenne
76%
86%
Smartphone - Moyenne compensée

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Revues et rapports de ordinateurs portatifs et smartphones, ordiphones > Critiques > Courte critique du smartphone Huawei P30 Lite
Marcus Herbrich, 2019-05-22 (Update: 2019-05-22)