Courte critique du smartphone Sony Xperia 10 Plus

Name: Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Brand: Sony

Nouvelle étape pour Sony. Avec ses smartphones actuels, ce fabricant réussit finalement à prendre en compte ce que les clients veulent vraiment, sans avoir à abandonner ses caractéristiques propres. Lisez notre rapport de test pour voir comment le Xperia 10 Plus, avec son ratio 21:9, se comporte face à la concurrence.

Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduit par Prévots), 04/19/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Exemplaire de test fourni par notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Xperia Gamme)

Processeur

Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 8 x 1.8 GHz, Kryo 260

Carte graphique

Qualcomm Adreno 509

Mémoire

4096 Mo

Écran

6.50 pouces 21:9, 2520 x 1080 pixel 422 PPP, capacitif, IPS, brillant: oui

Disque dur

64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 Go

, 50 Go libres

Connexions

1 USB 2.0, Connectique audio: 3,5 mm, Lecteur de cartes mémoires: micro SD (jusqu'à 512GB, FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Lecteur d'empreintes digitales, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Capteurs: accéléromètre, capteur de proximité, boussole

Réseau

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G GSM / GPRS / EDGE (850 / 900 / 1 800 / 1 900), 3G UMTS / HSPA+ (1 / 2 / 5 / 8), 4G LTE (1 / 2 / 3 / 5 / 7 / 8 / 20 / 28 / 32 / 38), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Taille

Hauteur x Largeur x Profondeur (en mm): 8.3 x 167 x 73

Batterie

3000 mAh Lithium-Polymère

Système d'exploitation

Android 9.0 Pie

Appareil photo

Appareil photo primaire: 12 MPix 12 + 8MP capteur Exmor RS, 1/2,8” + 1/4", 1,25 + 1,12 μm, 76,3 + 44,6°, f/1,75 + f/2,4
Appareil photo secondaire: 8 MPix 1/4", 1,12 µm, 84°, f/2,0

Fonctionnalités additionnelles

Haut-parleurs: 2 haut-parleurs, Clavier: virtuel, Rétroéclairage du clavier: oui, USB adaptateur secteur, câble USB C, écouteurs stéréos, 24 Mois Garantie, DAS (tête) : 0,72 W/kg, DAS (corps) : 1,49 W/kg, fanless

Poids

180 g, Alimentation: 56 g

Prix

430 euros

Liens

Sony Page d'accueil
Sony Section dédiée aux ordinateurs portables

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

voir toutes les spécifications

Comparaison des tailles

Sony Xperia 10 Plus Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Xiaomi Poco F1 Motorola Moto Z3 Play Nokia 8.1 Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL ❌

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	655 (619^min - 692^max) MBit/s ∼100% +328%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	647 (598^min - 665^max) MBit/s ∼99% +323%
Average of class Smartphone (5.59 - 1599, n=278, last 2 years)	479 MBit/s ∼73% +213%
Nokia 8.1 Adreno 616, SD 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash	300 (169^min - 367^max) MBit/s ∼46% +96%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Adreno 512, SD 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	285 (249^min - 304^max) MBit/s ∼44% +86%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	237 MBit/s ∼36% +55%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash	153 (133^min - 180^max) MBit/s ∼23%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Poco F1 Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	675 (630^min - 704^max) MBit/s ∼100% +113%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	612 (580^min - 635^max) MBit/s ∼91% +93%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Adreno 512, SD 660, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	584 (557^min - 605^max) MBit/s ∼87% +84%
Average of class Smartphone (15.5 - 1414, n=278, last 2 years)	471 MBit/s ∼70% +49%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash	317 (163^min - 343^max) MBit/s ∼47%
Nokia 8.1 Adreno 616, SD 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash	312 (273^min - 341^max) MBit/s ∼46% -2%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	232 MBit/s ∼34% -27%

; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø311 (163-343)

; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø153 (133-180)

Comparaison des images

Choisir une scène pour naviguer dans la première image. Un clic permet de changer le niveau de zoom, un autre clic permet de revenir à l'image originale dans une nouvelle fenêtre. La première image montre l'original pris par l'appareil testé.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

Cliquer pour charger les images

Cliquer pour charger les images

Cliquer pour charger les images


589 cd/m²	592 cd/m²	570 cd/m²
570 cd/m²	572 cd/m²	580 cd/m²
586 cd/m²	572 cd/m²	586 cd/m²

Homogénéité de la luminosité

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 592 cd/m² (Nits) Moyenne: 579.7 cd/m² Minimum: 5.99 cd/m²
Homogénéité de la luminosité: 96 %
Valeur mesurée au centre, sur batterie: 572 cd/m²
Contraste: 1430:1 (Valeurs des noirs: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5
ΔE Greyscale 7.9 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
95.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.16

	Sony Xperia 10 Plus IPS, 2520x1080, 6.50	Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 OLED, 2220x1080, 6.30	Xiaomi Poco F1 IPS, 2246x1080, 6.18	Motorola Moto Z3 Play AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6.00	Nokia 8.1 IPS, 2246x1080, 6.18	Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL 2246x1080, 6.20
Screen		30%	11%	-6%	-2%	4%
Brightness middle	572	553 -3%	489 -15%	446 -22%	567 -1%	601 5%
Brightness	580	553 -5%	486 -16%	451 -22%	547 -6%	565 -3%
Brightness Distribution	96	96 0%	93 -3%	93 -3%	92 -4%	90 -6%
Black Level *	0.4		0.34 15%		0.61 -53%	0.6 -50%
Contrast	1430		1438 1%		930 -35%	1002 -30%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.5	2.2 51%	3.8 16%	6.58 -46%	4.39 2%	3.4 24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	12.2	5.1 58%	7.1 42%	11.94 2%	7.28 40%	6.1 50%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	7.9	1.7 78%	4.4 44%	3.6 54%	4.9 38%	4.4 44%
Gamma	2.16 ^102%	2.06 ^107%	2.22 ^99%	2.199 ^100%	2.248 ^98%	2.25 ^98%
CCT	8726 ^74%	6434 ^101%	7213 ^90%	7116 ^91%	7642 ^85%	7493 ^87%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion)

ℹ

Afin d'abaisser la luminosité de l'écran, certains ordinateurs portables font varier très rapidement le rétroéclairage entre éteint et allumé. La fréquence à laquelle le rétroéclairage s'éteint et se rallume est normalement fixée à une valeur qui permet de rendre la variation indétectable à l'œil nu? Si la fréquence est trop basse, certaines personnes peuvent être sujettes à une fatigue oculaire, des maux de tête ou même percevoir les variations.

Scintillement / MLI (Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) décelé

2358 Hz

≤ 15 Niveau de luminosité

Le rétroéclairage de l'écran scintille à la fréquence de 2358 Hz (certainement du fait de l'utilisation d'une MDI - Modulation de largeur d'impulsion) à un niveau de luminosité inférieur ou égal à 15 % . Aucun scintillement ne devrait être perceptible au-dessus de cette valeur.

La fréquence de rafraîchissement de 2358 Hz est élevée, la grande majorité des utilisateurs ne devrait pas percevoir de scintillements et être sujette à une fatigue oculaire accrue.

En comparaison, 52 % des appareils testés n'emploient pas MDI pour assombrir leur écran. Nous avons relevé une moyenne à 20903 (minimum : 5 - maximum : 3846000) Hz dans le cas où une MDI était active.

Temps de réponse de l'écran

ℹ

Le temps de réponse d'un écran mesure la rapidité à laquelle l'écran est capable de changer une couleur pour une autre. Un temps de réponse élevé se traduit par une image floutée pour les objets en mouvement. Les joueurs bénéficieront de faibles latences d'affichage en jeu.

↔ Temps de réponse noir à blanc
20.8 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↗ 5.2 ms hausse
20.8 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↘ 15.6 ms chute
L'écran montre de bons temps de réponse, mais insuffisant pour du jeu compétitif. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 240 (maximum) ms. » 30 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont meilleures que la moyenne (23.8 ms) de tous les appareils testés.
↔ Temps de réponse gris 50% à gris 80%
44.8 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↗ 14.8 ms hausse
44.8 ms ... hausse ↗ et chute ↘ combinées	↘ 30 ms chute
L'écran souffre de latences très élevées, à éviter pour le jeu. En comparaison, tous les appareils testés affichent entre 0.8 (minimum) et 636 (maximum) ms. » 68 % des appareils testés affichent de meilleures performances. Cela signifie que les latences relevées sont moins bonnes que la moyenne (37.5 ms) de tous les appareils testés.

Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1346 Points ∼45%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1601 Points ∼54% +19%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2468 Points ∼83% +83%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1330 Points ∼45% -1%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1799 Points ∼61% +34%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2457 Points ∼83% +83%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2425 Points ∼82% +80%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (1323 - 1506, n=11)	1351 Points ∼46% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (412 - 6287, n=65, last 2 years)	2967 Points ∼100% +120%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	4804 Points ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	5826 Points ∼63% +21%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	9182 Points ∼100% +91%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	4941 Points ∼54% +3%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	5856 Points ∼64% +22%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	9014 Points ∼98% +88%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8849 Points ∼96% +84%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (4781 - 5426, n=11)	4960 Points ∼54% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (1163 - 15231, n=65, last 2 years)	8791 Points ∼96% +83%
Compute RenderScript Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	4278 Points ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	5542 Points ∼39% +30%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	14369 Points ∼100% +236%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	4501 Points ∼31% +5%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	6813 Points ∼47% +59%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	14160 Points ∼99% +231%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	13496 Points ∼94% +215%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (4278 - 5041, n=11)	4505 Points ∼31% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (2810 - 11557, n=54, last 2 years)	7394 Points ∼51% +73%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	7181 Points ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	6338 Points ∼60% -12%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	9664 Points ∼91% +35%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6457 Points ∼61% -10%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	8309 Points ∼79% +16%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	10571 Points ∼100% +47%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	9971 Points ∼94% +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (6040 - 7618, n=11)	6624 Points ∼63% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (2689 - 19989, n=168, last 2 years)	10318 Points ∼98% +44%
Work 2.0 performance score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6018 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	5789 Points ∼69% -4%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8101 Points ∼96% +35%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	5640 Points ∼67% -6%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	6887 Points ∼82% +14%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8430 Points ∼100% +40%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8365 Points ∼99% +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (5611 - 6277, n=11)	5833 Points ∼69% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 15299, n=213, last 2 years)	8275 Points ∼98% +38%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	Points ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	25783 Points ∼40%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	63159 Points ∼98%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	19873 Points ∼31%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	28895 Points ∼45%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	64592 Points ∼100%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	62063 Points ∼96%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (19525 - 20404, n=11)	19846 Points ∼31%
Average of class Smartphone (2920 - 117606, n=148, last 2 years)	43581 Points ∼67%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	Points ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	29065 Points ∼34%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	82125 Points ∼97%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	20908 Points ∼25%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	39655 Points ∼47%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	84681 Points ∼100%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	80166 Points ∼95%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (20610 - 21067, n=11)	20839 Points ∼25%
Average of class Smartphone (2463 - 224130, n=148, last 2 years)	63404 Points ∼75%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	Points ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	18523 Points ∼52%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	34928 Points ∼99%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	16939 Points ∼48%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	14820 Points ∼42%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	35290 Points ∼100%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	34665 Points ∼98%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (15766 - 19365, n=11)	17020 Points ∼48%
Average of class Smartphone (8324 - 59268, n=148, last 2 years)	24345 Points ∼69%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1469 Points ∼23%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2054 Points ∼33% +40%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5687 Points ∼90% +287%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1474 Points ∼23% 0%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2691 Points ∼43% +83%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6293 Points ∼100% +328%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6252 Points ∼99% +326%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (1458 - 1493, n=11)	1475 Points ∼23% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 11256, n=225, last 2 years)	3594 Points ∼57% +145%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1327 Points ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1918 Points ∼23% +45%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8261 Points ∼100% +523%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1333 Points ∼16% 0%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2763 Points ∼33% +108%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8236 Points ∼100% +521%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8179 Points ∼99% +516%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (1313 - 1353, n=11)	1331 Points ∼16% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (54 - 16670, n=225, last 2 years)	4189 Points ∼51% +216%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2349 Points ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2741 Points ∼79% +17%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2720 Points ∼78% +16%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2337 Points ∼67% -1%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2467 Points ∼71% +5%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3482 Points ∼100% +48%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3392 Points ∼97% +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (1349 - 2626, n=11)	2280 Points ∼65% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (677 - 5301, n=225, last 2 years)	2896 Points ∼83% +23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1536 Points ∼24%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1898 Points ∼30% +24%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5230 Points ∼82% +240%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1541 Points ∼24% 0%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2772 Points ∼43% +80%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6375 Points ∼100% +315%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6083 Points ∼95% +296%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (1525 - 1568, n=11)	1541 Points ∼24% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (149 - 11895, n=254, last 2 years)	4490 Points ∼70% +192%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1397 Points ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1757 Points ∼21% +26%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6898 Points ∼83% +394%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1400 Points ∼17% 0%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2855 Points ∼34% +104%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8352 Points ∼100% +498%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8291 Points ∼99% +493%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (1358 - 1406, n=11)	1395 Points ∼17% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (122 - 31940, n=254, last 2 years)	5843 Points ∼70% +318%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2352 Points ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2645 Points ∼76% +12%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2832 Points ∼81% +20%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2384 Points ∼68% +1%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2516 Points ∼72% +7%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3486 Points ∼100% +48%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3148 Points ∼90% +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (2288 - 2683, n=11)	2386 Points ∼68% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (651 - 6394, n=252, last 2 years)	3144 Points ∼90% +34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	946 Points ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1354 Points ∼29% +43%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3972 Points ∼85% +320%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	953 Points ∼20% +1%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1834 Points ∼39% +94%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4656 Points ∼100% +392%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4617 Points ∼99% +388%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (934 - 962, n=11)	950 Points ∼20% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (78 - 9138, n=222, last 2 years)	2780 Points ∼60% +194%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	808 Points ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1185 Points ∼23% +47%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4746 Points ∼92% +487%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	815 Points ∼16% +1%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1702 Points ∼33% +111%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5158 Points ∼100% +538%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5144 Points ∼100% +537%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (797 - 818, n=11)	812 Points ∼16% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (62 - 11573, n=222, last 2 years)	2940 Points ∼57% +264%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2351 Points ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2073 Points ∼60% -12%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2528 Points ∼73% +8%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2327 Points ∼67% -1%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2514 Points ∼72% +7%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3473 Points ∼100% +48%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3399 Points ∼98% +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (2251 - 2634, n=11)	2358 Points ∼68% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (688 - 5318, n=222, last 2 years)	2920 Points ∼84% +24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1003 Points ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1433 Points ∼28% +43%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3669 Points ∼73% +266%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1008 Points ∼20% 0%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1964 Points ∼39% +96%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5036 Points ∼100% +402%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4971 Points ∼99% +396%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (765 - 1016, n=11)	980 Points ∼19% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (91 - 9839, n=256, last 2 years)	3699 Points ∼73% +269%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	862 Points ∼15%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1268 Points ∼22% +47%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4468 Points ∼78% +418%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	865 Points ∼15% 0%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1845 Points ∼32% +114%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5747 Points ∼100% +567%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5641 Points ∼98% +554%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (645 - 872, n=11)	841 Points ∼15% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (73 - 16221, n=256, last 2 years)	4349 Points ∼76% +405%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2345 Points ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2774 Points ∼79% +18%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2257 Points ∼64% -4%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2384 Points ∼68% +2%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2534 Points ∼72% +8%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3515 Points ∼100% +50%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3512 Points ∼100% +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (2258 - 2644, n=11)	2372 Points ∼67% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (635 - 5793, n=256, last 2 years)	3172 Points ∼90% +35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	944 Points ∼35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (926 - 944, n=2)	935 Points ∼35% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (426 - 6977, n=195, last 2 years)	2671 Points ∼100% +183%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	809 Points ∼27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (789 - 809, n=2)	799 Points ∼27% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (349 - 11259, n=195, last 2 years)	3007 Points ∼100% +272%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2282 Points ∼86%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (2175 - 2282, n=2)	2229 Points ∼84% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1786 - 4061, n=195, last 2 years)	2652 Points ∼100% +16%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	30 fps ∼47%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	50 fps ∼78% +67%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	60 fps ∼93% +100%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	35 fps ∼54% +17%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	57 fps ∼88% +90%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	60 fps ∼93% +100%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	60 fps ∼93% +100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (30 - 40, n=12)	34.3 fps ∼53% +14%
Average of class Smartphone (8.2 - 143, n=208, last 2 years)	64.5 fps ∼100% +115%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	35 fps ∼23%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	46 fps ∼31% +31%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	150 fps ∼100% +329%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	36 fps ∼24% +3%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	65 fps ∼43% +86%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	150 fps ∼100% +329%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	149 fps ∼99% +326%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (35 - 36, n=12)	35.6 fps ∼24% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (4.3 - 425, n=208, last 2 years)	122 fps ∼81% +249%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	13 fps ∼22%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	21 fps ∼36% +62%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	58 fps ∼98% +346%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	15 fps ∼25% +15%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	31 fps ∼53% +138%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	59 fps ∼100% +354%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	55 fps ∼93% +323%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (13 - 18, n=12)	15 fps ∼25% +15%
Average of class Smartphone (4.5 - 121, n=207, last 2 years)	51.8 fps ∼88% +298%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	16 fps ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	23 fps ∼28% +44%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	71 fps ∼87% +344%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	16 fps ∼20% 0%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	32 fps ∼39% +100%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	82 fps ∼100% +413%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	80 fps ∼98% +400%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (16 - 16, n=12)	16 fps ∼20% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 251, n=208, last 2 years)	71.1 fps ∼87% +344%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	8.4 fps ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	14 fps ∼26% +67%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	54 fps ∼100% +543%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	9.8 fps ∼18% +17%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	22 fps ∼41% +162%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	53 fps ∼98% +531%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	51 fps ∼94% +507%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (5.7 - 12, n=12)	9.47 fps ∼18% +13%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 106, n=206, last 2 years)	40.3 fps ∼75% +380%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	10 fps ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	15 fps ∼25% +50%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	35 fps ∼58% +250%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	10 fps ∼17% 0%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	23 fps ∼38% +130%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	60 fps ∼100% +500%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	59 fps ∼98% +490%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (6.3 - 10, n=12)	9.68 fps ∼16% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1.4 - 169, n=206, last 2 years)	48.9 fps ∼82% +389%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	5.1 fps ∼15%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	8.3 fps ∼25% +63%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	33 fps ∼100% +547%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6 fps ∼18% +18%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	12 fps ∼36% +135%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	31 fps ∼94% +508%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	31 fps ∼94% +508%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (5.1 - 7.4, n=12)	5.96 fps ∼18% +17%
Average of class Smartphone (3.3 - 61, n=205, last 2 years)	25.1 fps ∼76% +392%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6.3 fps ∼18%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	9.1 fps ∼26% +44%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	35 fps ∼100% +456%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6.3 fps ∼18% 0%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	13 fps ∼37% +106%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	35 fps ∼100% +456%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	35 fps ∼100% +456%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (6.3 - 6.3, n=12)	6.3 fps ∼18% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1.8 - 96.6, n=205, last 2 years)	29.3 fps ∼84% +365%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	4.9 fps ∼14%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	7.5 fps ∼21% +53%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	31 fps ∼86% +533%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	13 fps ∼36% +165%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	36 fps ∼100% +635%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (4.9 - 6.9, n=9)	5.59 fps ∼16% +14%
Average of class Smartphone (1.5 - 73, n=266, last 2 years)	25.8 fps ∼72% +427%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6.1 fps ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	8.6 fps ∼23% +41%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	32 fps ∼86% +425%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	14 fps ∼38% +130%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	37 fps ∼100% +507%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (5.4 - 6.1, n=9)	5.93 fps ∼16% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1.9 - 257, n=266, last 2 years)	30.4 fps ∼82% +398%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	3.2 fps ∼14%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	4.8 fps ∼21% +50%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	22 fps ∼96% +588%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	8.2 fps ∼36% +156%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	23 fps ∼100% +619%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (2 - 4.4, n=9)	3.27 fps ∼14% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (2.1 - 60, n=267, last 2 years)	17.3 fps ∼75% +441%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2.2 fps ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	3 fps ∼21% +36%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	14 fps ∼100% +536%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	5 fps ∼36% +127%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	14 fps ∼100% +536%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (2.2 - 3.5, n=9)	2.36 fps ∼17% +7%
Average of class Smartphone (0.7 - 101, n=267, last 2 years)	11.7 fps ∼84% +432%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	117574 Points ∼43%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	140878 Points ∼52% +20%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	263165 Points ∼97% +124%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	115656 Points ∼42% -2%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	169262 Points ∼62% +44%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	272546 Points ∼100% +132%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	266374 Points ∼98% +127%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (115565 - 138661, n=11)	118863 Points ∼44% +1%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1734 Points ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2364 Points ∼53% +36%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3838 Points ∼86% +121%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2044 Points ∼46% +18%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2731 Points ∼61% +57%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4478 Points ∼100% +158%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4406 Points ∼98% +154%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (1734 - 2156, n=10)	1957 Points ∼44% +13%
Average of class Smartphone (615 - 8124, n=192, last 2 years)	3926 Points ∼88% +126%
System (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	4342 Points ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	5063 Points ∼63% +17%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6506 Points ∼81% +50%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	4628 Points ∼57% +7%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	5681 Points ∼70% +31%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8081 Points ∼100% +86%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8023 Points ∼99% +85%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (4320 - 5348, n=10)	4559 Points ∼56% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (1160 - 19657, n=192, last 2 years)	7118 Points ∼88% +64%
Memory (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1236 Points ∼27%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2393 Points ∼52% +94%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3239 Points ∼70% +162%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2208 Points ∼48% +79%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	2947 Points ∼64% +138%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3924 Points ∼85% +217%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3762 Points ∼81% +204%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (1236 - 2492, n=10)	1958 Points ∼42% +58%
Average of class Smartphone (522 - 9044, n=192, last 2 years)	4618 Points ∼100% +274%
Graphics (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1611 Points ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	2332 Points ∼29% +45%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	7945 Points ∼100% +393%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1625 Points ∼20% +1%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	3086 Points ∼39% +92%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	7860 Points ∼99% +388%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	7777 Points ∼98% +383%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (1590 - 1632, n=10)	1608 Points ∼20% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (349 - 25642, n=192, last 2 years)	6233 Points ∼78% +287%
Web (Classer selon les valeurs)
Sony Xperia 10 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1046 Points ∼65%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144	1105 Points ∼69% +6%
Xiaomi Poco F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	1296 Points ∼80% +24%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1052 Points ∼65% +1%
Nokia 8.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096	1077 Points ∼67% +3%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	1613 Points ∼100% +54%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	1606 Points ∼100% +54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (876 - 1088, n=10)	1037 Points ∼64% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2392, n=192, last 2 years)	1331 Points ∼83% +27%

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 182, n=185, last 2 years)	55 Points ∼100% +112%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (26 - 26.4, n=2)	26.2 Points ∼48% +1%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)	25.96 Points ∼47%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 244, n=170, last 2 years)	54 runs/min ∼100% +97%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)	27.4 runs/min ∼51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (25.5 - 27.4, n=2)	26.5 runs/min ∼49% -3%

WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 252, n=198, last 2 years)	83.3 Points ∼100% +54%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)	72 Points ∼86% +33%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70)	59 Points ∼71% +9%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67)	55 Points ∼66% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (46 - 61, n=9)	54.4 Points ∼65% +1%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)	54 Points ∼65%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 64222, n=204, last 2 years)	19755 Points ∼100% +142%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL (Chrome 68, AI Boost ON)	16728 Points ∼85% +105%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL (Chrome 68)	16635 Points ∼84% +104%
Xiaomi Poco F1 (Chrome 68)	14514 Points ∼73% +78%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)	12717 Points ∼64% +56%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70)	10145 Points ∼51% +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (8163 - 9746, n=12)	8665 Points ∼44% +6%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67)	8519 Points ∼43% +4%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)	8163 Points ∼41%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67)	4820 ms * ∼100% -2%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)	4739 ms * ∼98%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (4105 - 5066, n=12)	4687 ms * ∼97% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 (Chrome 70)	3841.8 (1^min) ms * ∼80% +19%
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 29635, n=206, last 2 years)	3599 ms * ∼75% +24%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)	3034.9 ms * ∼63% +36%
Xiaomi Poco F1 (Chrome 68)	2713.6 ms * ∼56% +43%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL (Chrome 68, AI Boost ON)	2277 ms * ∼47% +52%
Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL (Chrome 68)	2264 ms * ∼47% +52%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

	Sony Xperia 10 Plus	Samsung Galaxy A9 2018	Xiaomi Poco F1	Motorola Moto Z3 Play	Nokia 8.1	Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL	Average 64 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		18%	30%	62%	-11%	117%	5%	184%
Sequential Read 256KB	280.34	426.63 52%	705.38 152%	271.7 -3%	279.3 0%	721 157%	273 ?(95.6 - 704, n=182) -3%	843 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=269, last 2 years) 201%
Sequential Write 256KB	205.19	194.65 -5%	155.57 -24%	182.5 -11%	203.8 -1%	193.18 -6%	177 ?(40 - 274, n=182) -14%	386 ?(11.9 - 1321, n=269, last 2 years) 88%
Random Read 4KB	77.67	116.76 50%	101.01 30%	60.6 -22%	69.9 -10%	124.05 60%	58.6 ?(9.58 - 149, n=182) -25%	148 ?(13.5 - 325, n=269, last 2 years) 91%
Random Write 4KB	16.77	19.79 18%	17.81 6%	84.1 401%	7.3 -56%	96.6 476%	30.3 ?(2.34 - 147, n=182) 81%	139 ?(5.5 - 330, n=269, last 2 years) 729%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	83.92 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	73.66 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -12%	85.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 2%	83.7 0%	84.65 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 1%	85.94 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 2%	77.4 ?(21.1 - 108, n=144) -8%	76.5 ?(25.5 - 154, n=120, last 2 years) -9%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	58.44 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	59.66 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 2%	65.58 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 12%	62.7 7%	58.27 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	66.54 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 14%	58.3 ?(11.2 - 83.3, n=144) 0%	58.9 ?(12.1 - 83.3, n=120, last 2 years) 1%

PUBG Compare

; Smooth: Ø24.7 (9-26)

; Balanced: Ø24.8 (10-26)

Arena of Valor

; min: Ø32.2 (31-33)

; high HD: Ø31.1 (28-32)

A pleine charge

Au repos/à faible charge


40.8 °C	37.5 °C	31.6 °C
40.4 °C	36.8 °C	30.7 °C
36.9 °C	34 °C	30.8 °C

Maximum: 40.8 °C
Moyenne: 35.5 °C


30.9 °C	34.1 °C	37.3 °C
29.9 °C	32.3 °C	38 °C
28.6 °C	31.6 °C	37.1 °C

Maximum: 38 °C
Moyenne: 33.3 °C

Alimentation (valeur maximale) 29.7 °C | Température ambiante de la pièce 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Sony Xperia 10 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Motorola Moto Z3 Play audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Consommation énergétique

Éteint/en veille	0.01 / 0.14 Watts
Au repos	0.68 / 2.12 / 2.17 Watts
Fortement sollicité	3.82 / 6.44 Watts


Légende: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Sony Xperia 10 Plus 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 3800 mAh	Xiaomi Poco F1 4000 mAh	Motorola Moto Z3 Play 3000 mAh	Nokia 8.1 3500 mAh	Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL 3300 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-10%	-7%	-17%	12%	-53%	-19%	-9%
Idle Minimum *	0.68	1.06 -56%	0.65 4%	1.3 -91%	0.8 -18%	0.97 -43%	0.944 ?(0.6 - 1.75, n=12) -39%	0.933 ?(0.12 - 2.5, n=214, last 2 years) -37%
Idle Average *	2.12	1.94 8%	1.97 7%	2 6%	1.5 29%	2.52 -19%	2.22 ?(1.4 - 4.48, n=12) -5%	1.774 ?(0.65 - 3.94, n=214, last 2 years) 16%
Idle Maximum *	2.17	1.98 9%	2.01 7%	2.7 -24%	1.8 17%	2.62 -21%	2.54 ?(2 - 4.5, n=12) -17%	2.01 ?(0.69 - 4.01, n=214, last 2 years) 7%
Load Average *	3.82	3.56 7%	4.29 -12%	3.7 3%	3.2 16%	7.41 -94%	4.51 ?(3.65 - 7.92, n=12) -18%	4.44 ?(2.1 - 8.4, n=214, last 2 years) -16%
Load Maximum *	6.44	7.49 -16%	9.05 -41%	5.1 21%	5.4 16%	12.22 -90%	7.37 ?(5.1 - 13.6, n=12) -14%	7.34 ?(3.56 - 12.3, n=214, last 2 years) -14%

* ... Moindre est la valeur, meilleures sont les performances

Autonomie

Au repos (module WiFi éteint, luminosité au minimum)		23h 20min
WiFi Websurfing		10h 35min
En lecture de Big Buck Bunny encodé en H.264 1080p		11h 41min
Fortement sollicité (luminosité au maximum)		2h 34min

	Sony Xperia 10 Plus 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A9 2018 3800 mAh	Xiaomi Poco F1 4000 mAh	Motorola Moto Z3 Play 3000 mAh	Nokia 8.1 3500 mAh	Asus ZenFone 5Z ZS620KL 3300 mAh
Autonomie de la batterie		28%	38%	1%	30%	2%
Reader / Idle	1400	1780 27%	2088 49%	1245 -11%	1682 20%
H.264	701	1005 43%	936 34%	648 -8%	857 22%
WiFi v1.3	635	689 9%	808 27%	595 -6%	738 16%	645 2%
Load	154	205 33%	220 43%	199 29%	246 60%

Points positifs

+ construction et impression

+ accès aux cartes SIM et micro SD sans outil

+ grand écran mais taille raisonnable

+ double SIM et stockage supplémentaire simultanés

+ Bluetooth 5.0 et USB C

Points négatifs

- clavier virtuel soit trop étroit soit trop large

- performances

- USB 2.0

Verdict

En test : le Sony Xperia 10 Plus. Modèle de test fourni par:

Dans nos tests, le Sony Xperia 10 Plus a été capable d’effectuer les tâches classiques du quotidien sans sourciller. L’appareil photo est tout à fait suffisant pour un usage occasionnel, et le design est à des années-lumière du design cubique de Sony. Et dès qu’on le prend en main, on s’aperçoit que grâce à son ratio 21:9, il est très confortable à tenir. Les fonctionnalités pour aider à l’utilisation à une main améliorent encore cela. Cela mis à part, nous avons apprécié la possibilité d’utiliser deux cartes nano SIM et une micro SD simultanément, ainsi qu’aucun outil n’est nécessaire pour les enlever.

Le Sony Xperia 10 Plus nous impressionne avec son grand écran, et beaucoup d’applis permettent d’exploiter cet espace supplémentaire. Le design et la qualité sont très bons - seules les performances sont laissées de côté, restant plus ou moins en retrait de la concurrence.

Certains pourraient être gênés par ce ratio inhabituel, qui fait qu’en mode portrait le clavier est trop petit, et trop grand en mode paysage. Et même si de nombreuses applis peuvent s’accommoder de ce format, d’autres nécessitent des bandes noires. Les spécifications techniques sont celles du milieu de gamme, tandis que les performances sont plutôt inférieures à celles des concurrents de cette classe. Néanmoins, nous avons là un smartphone très séduisant, qui n’a pas à se cacher.

L’intégralité de cette critique est disponible en anglais en suivant ce lien.

Sony Xperia 10 Plus - 2019-04-15 04/15/2019 v6^(old)
Mike Wobker

Châssis

86%

Clavier

65 / 75 → 86%

Dispositif de pointage

91%

Connectivité

43 / 60 → 71%

Poids

90%